查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
云端原生自动化和ETSI NFV MANO:演进，转移，共存策略
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1789656

云端原生自动化和ETSI NFV MANO:演进，转移，共存策略

Cloud-Native Automation and ETSI NFV MANO: Evolution, Migration and Co-Existence Strategies
出版日期: | 出版商: Analysys Mason | 英文 34 Slides | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格
简介目录

即使是热衷于采用云端原生自动化的电信业者，也不愿采用 NFV。 MANO 似乎不太可能在短期内完全从网路中淘汰。

电信业者主要依赖欧洲电信标准协会 (ETSI) 网路功能虚拟化 (NFV) 管理和编排 (MANO) 架构来进行虚拟化网路功能 (VNF) 的生命週期管理和相关网路服务的编排。随着云端原生网路功能 (CNF) 的日益普及，人们对实施云端原生自动化 (CNA) 的兴趣也日益浓厚，这是一种利用 Kubernetes (K8s) 固有自动化功能的新型自动化范式。营运商期望 CNA 能够释放 MANO 一直难以实现的自动化优势。 ETSI 还计划改进 MANO，使其更符合 CNA 原则。然而，最佳路径营运商推进网路自动化的途径仍不明朗。

本报告探讨了营运商可以采取的各种方法，以便从网路自动化中获得更大的收益：要么发展其 NFV MANO 实施，要么将 CNA 解决方案迁移到 NFV。本报告探讨了 NFV MANO（与 CNA 协同）的采用以及采用混合自动化方法的影响。报告还讨论了营运商如何弥合 NFV MANO 和 CNA 之间的差距，以及网路自动化范式转移对产业生态系统的影响。

本报告解答的问题

  • 营运商发展其网路自动化方法的关键考虑因素是什么？
  • 营运商可以采用哪些策略来利用 MANO 和 CNA 推进网路自动化？
  • 不断发展的 MANO 标准和实施对营运商意味着什么？
  • 营运商如何实施 CNA 方法、从中受益并克服课题？
  • 供应商如何在营运商的自动化之旅中提供支援？
简介目录

"Even operators keen to adopt cloud-native automation are unlikely to be able to completely remove NFV MANO from their network anytime soon."

Telecoms operators primarily rely on the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) network functions virtualisation (NFV) management and orchestration (MANO) architecture for managing the lifecycle of virtualised network functions (VNFs) and orchestrating associated network services. The growing adoption of cloud-native network function (CNF) has led to increasing interest in implementing a new automation paradigm - cloud-native automation (CNA) - which uses the inherent automation capabilities of Kubernetes (K8s). Operators hope that CNA can unlock automation benefits that they have struggled to achieve with MANO. Additionally, ETSI plans to evolve MANO to align more closely with CNA principles. However, the best pathways for operators to advance their network automation remain unclear.

This report explores different approaches for operators to unlock greater benefits from their network automation, namely by evolving their NFV MANO implementations or adopting CNA solutions (alongside NFV MANO, thereby adopting a hybrid automation approach). It also discusses how operators can bridge the gap between NFV MANO and CNA and the implications of the changing network automation paradigm on the industry ecosystem.

Questions answered in this report:

  • What are the key considerations for operators that are looking to evolve their approaches to network automation?
  • What strategies can operators adopt to advance their network automation with MANO and CNA?
  • What are the implications of evolving MANO standards and implementations for operators?
  • How can operators implement, benefit from and overcome the challenges of CNA approaches?
  • How can vendors best support operators with advancing their automation?