查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
2023-2030 年细胞培养蛋白表面涂层的全球市场
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1272769

2023-2030 年细胞培养蛋白表面涂层的全球市场

Global Cell Culture Protein Surface Coating Market - 2023-2030
出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 约2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

市场概览

细胞培养蛋白表面涂层的全球市场规模预计到 2022 年将达到 8.434 亿美元，到 2030 年将达到 18.105 亿美元，在预测期内（2023-2030 年）增长 10.3%。预计将增长复合年增长率。 主要参与者增加产品发布将有助于在预测期内促进细胞培养蛋白表面涂层市场的增长。 例如，2020年6月，康宁公司推出了包括Matrigel matrix-3D板在内的新产品。

作为附加表面处理的涂层是指为增强细胞粘附而进行的任何附加修改，以及製造商对所有细胞培养塑料进行的标准等离子或电晕处理。 涂层通常用蛋白质或□完成。 细胞培养的一个缺点是它需要高度熟练的人员，动物细胞比许多常见的污染物（细菌、病毒和真菌）生长得慢，并且必须在严格的无菌技术下进行。

市场动态

3D 细胞培养的日益普及推动了细胞培养蛋白表面涂层市场的增长

3D 细胞培养的额外维度是影响细胞反应的关键特征。 这不仅会影响与周围细胞相互作用的细胞表面受体的空间组织，还会对细胞施加物理限制。

3D 培养的这些空间和物理方面从外到内影响细胞信号，最终影响基因表达和细胞行为。 与 2D 培养相比，3D 培养中的细胞反应已被证明可以更接近地模拟体内行为。

微生物污染的风险是阻碍市场增长的一个因素

细胞培养需要持续监测以防止污染，同时要避免细胞培养蛋白表面涂层的浪费，它本身也很昂贵，影响了市场增长。

此外，组织组成是可变的和异质的。 来自同一样本的副本具有不同的成分。 必须通过连续传代多次操作细胞系才能重现实验结果。

例如，任何文化都会与原本不同，其构成也不统一。 为了解决这个问题，复製品在每一代随机混合，生长条件的选择压力倾向于产生最佳显性表型。 这些缺点将阻碍细胞培养蛋白表面涂层市场的增长。

COVID-19 影响分析

根据 2022 年 7 月发表在《临床病毒学杂誌》上的一份报告，在培养物中分离出 SARS-CoV-2 的概率、出现症状的天数更少以及 RT-PCR 循环阈值更低之间存在显着差异。存在显着的正相关。

因此，在 COVID-19 中，细胞培养被用于正确诊断，这有望推动细胞培养蛋白表面涂层市场的增长。 病毒研究仍在进行中，因此预计将在未来产生重大影响。

俄乌衝突分析

俄罗斯和乌克兰之间的衝突中断了文化中使用的某些设备的供应链，增加了消费者的成本，并使他们更难获得所需的设备。 这些因素对细胞培养蛋白表面涂层市场产生了重大影响。

内容

第 1 章研究方法和范围

  • 调查方法
  • 调查目的和范围

第 2 章定义和概述

第 3 章执行摘要

  • 按涂层类型
  • 按蛋白质来源
  • 按地区

第四章市场动态

  • 影响分析
    • 主持人
      • 3D 细胞培养的普及促进了细胞培养蛋白的表麵包被
    • 约束因素
      • 基因突变等风险因素
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第五章行业分析

  • 波特的五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 价格分析
  • 法律法规分析

第 6 章 COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • COVID-19 之前的情景
    • 当前的 COVID-19 情景
    • COVID-19 后或未来情景
  • COVID-19 期间的价格和动态
  • 供需范围
  • 大流行期间与市场相关的政府举措
  • 製造商的战略举措
  • 总结

第 7 章按涂层类型

  • 预涂
    • 多壁微孔板
  • 烧瓶
  • 培养皿
  • 自涂层

第 8 章蛋白质来源

  • 动物起源
  • 综合
  • 人类起源
  • 植物来源

第9章按地区

  • 北美
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 意大利
    • 西班牙
    • 其他欧洲
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 其他南美洲
  • 亚太地区
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳大利亚
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 中东和非洲

第10章竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场情况/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第11章公司简介

  • 赛默飞世尔科技
    • 公司概况
    • 产品组合和说明
    • 财务摘要
    • 主要发展状况
  • Corning
  • Merck KGaA
  • PerkinElmer, Inc
  • Greiner Bio-One International GmbH
  • Agilent Technologies
  • BRAND GMBH+CO KG
  • Kollodis BioSciences Inc
  • DenovoMATRIX
  • faCellitate

第12章 附录

简介目录
Product Code: BT3671

Market Overview

The global cell culture protein surface coating market size was valued at US$ 843.4 million in 2022 and is estimated to reach US$ 1,810.5 million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 10.3% during the forecast period (2023-2030). An increase in the product launches by major key players helps to boost cell culture protein surface coating market growth over the forecast period. For instance, in June 2020, Corning Incorporated launched new products, including Matrigel matrix-3D plates.

Coating as an additional surface treatment stands for all additional modifications made to increase cell adhesion and the standard plasma or corona treatment performed on all cell culture plastic by the manufacturer. Usually, a coating is done with proteins or peptides. The disadvantages of cell culture are: highly skilled personnel, techniques must be performed using strict asepsis techniques because animal cells grow slower than many of the common contaminants (bacteria, viruses, and fungi).

Market Dynamics

Increasing adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the cell culture protein surface coating market growth

The additional dimensionality of 3D cell cultures is the crucial feature leading to the differences in cellular responses. It not only influences the spatial organization of the cell surface receptors engaged in interactions with surrounding cells, but it also induces physical constraints on cells.

These spatial and physical aspects in 3D cultures affect the signal transduction from the outside to the inside of cells and ultimately influence gene expression and cellular behavior. It has been demonstrated that cell responses in 3D cultures are more similar to in vivo behavior compared to 2D cultures.

The risk of microbial contamination and others are factors hindering the market growth

Cell cultures should be constantly monitored to prevent contamination and avoid wastage of protein surface coating of the cell cultures, which can be expensive in nature, thereby impacting the growth of the market.

In addition, tissue composition is variable and heterogeneous. Replicas from the same sample have various constituents. To replicate an experimental result, cell lines must be manipulated many times in serial passages.

For instance, every culture will be different from the original and less uniform in its constitution. The replicas are randomly mixed in each passage to resolve this issue, and the selective pressure of growing conditions tends to produce an optimal prevalent phenotype. These disadvantages will hamper the cell culture protein surface coating market growth.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

As per the report published by the Journal of Clinical Virology in July 2022, there was a significant positive correlation between the probability of isolating SARS-CoV-2 in culture, fewer days of symptoms, and a lower RT-PCR cycle threshold value.

Hence, the cell culture was used during COVID-19 for proper diagnosis and was expected to drive the growth of the cell culture protein surface coatings market. As viral studies are still ongoing, it is expected to have a significant impact in the coming future.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict Analysis

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine has caused a disruption of the supply chain for some of the equipment used in culture, increasing costs for consumers and making it more difficult for them to access the necessary equipment. These factors have had a significant impact on the cell culture protein surface coating market.

Segment Analysis

The global cell culture protein surface coating market is segmented based on coating type, protein source, and region.

The pre coating segment is expected to hold a dominant position during the forecast period

In coating type segment, the precoating segment accounted for the highest cell culture protein surface coating market size of around 3/5th in 2022. Depending on the quality and quantity control of the plasma treatment surface of the flask, petri dish or microwell plates are activated for adhesion either homogeneously or artefacts, and it may be inserted, as regions like edges are not treated or parts in the middle area or over or under activated.

Another important part of choosing a cell culture consumable supplier is the construction design. Multiwell plates and petri dishes are strongly influenced by adhesion.

Geographical Analysis

North America holds a dominant position in the market

One of the secrets that allow Canada to punch above its weight in the biomanufacturing economy is the tradition of collaboration between academia, industry, non-profits, and government support. In British Columbia, both the University of Victoria and the University of British Columbia have strong undergraduate programs in biomedical engineering that provide an important supply of talent to feed the growing biomanufacturing ecosystems and address challenges in regenerative medicine.

The Canadian government has already invested 1.2 billion dollars into a national biomanufacturing strategy that they continue to support. The Canadian government also supports research and development through its national funding agency - the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Thermo Fisher Scientific, Corning, Merck, PerkinElmer, Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, Agilent Technologies, BRAND GMBH + CO KG, Kollodis BioSciences, DenovoMATRIX, and faCellitate among others.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global cell culture protein surface coating market segmentation based on the type, end user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of global cell culture protein surface coating market level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global cell culture protein surface coating market report would provide approximately 92 tables, 108 figures and 195 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Coating Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Protein Source
  • 3.3. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Increasing the adoption of 3D cell culture will drive the cell culture protein surface coating
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Risk factors such as genetic mutations
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Before COVID-19 Scenario
    • 6.1.2. Present COVID-19 Scenario
    • 6.1.3. Post COVID-19 or Future Scenario
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Coating Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Coating Type
  • 7.2. Precoating*
    • 7.2.1. Multiwall/microwell plates
    • 7.2.2. Introduction
    • 7.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Flasks
  • 7.4. Petri dishes
  • 7.5. Self-coating

8. By Protein Source

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Protein Source
  • 8.2. Animal-derived*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Synthetic
  • 8.4. Human-derived
  • 8.5. Plant-derived

9. By Region

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 9.2. North America
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 9.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
    • 9.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
    • 9.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 9.2.5.1. The U.S.
      • 9.2.5.2. Canada
      • 9.2.5.3. Mexico
  • 9.3. Europe
    • 9.3.1. Introduction
    • 9.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 9.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
    • 9.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
    • 9.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 9.3.5.1. Germany
      • 9.3.5.2. The U.K.
      • 9.3.5.3. France
      • 9.3.5.4. Italy
      • 9.3.5.5. Spain
      • 9.3.5.6. Rest of Europe
  • 9.4. South America
    • 9.4.1. Introduction
    • 9.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 9.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
    • 9.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
    • 9.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 9.4.5.1. Brazil
      • 9.4.5.2. Argentina
      • 9.4.5.3. Rest of South America
  • 9.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 9.5.1. Introduction
    • 9.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 9.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
    • 9.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
    • 9.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 9.5.5.1. China
      • 9.5.5.2. India
      • 9.5.5.3. Japan
      • 9.5.5.4. Australia
      • 9.5.5.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 9.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 9.6.1. Introduction
    • 9.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 9.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Coating Type
    • 9.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Protein Source
    • 9.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country

10. Competitive Landscape

  • 10.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 10.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 10.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

11. Company Profiles

  • 11.1. Thermo Fisher Scientific*
    • 11.1.1. Company Overview
    • 11.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 11.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 11.1.4. Key Developments
  • 11.2. Corning
  • 11.3. Merck KGaA
  • 11.4. PerkinElmer, Inc
  • 11.5. Greiner Bio-One International GmbH
  • 11.6. Agilent Technologies
  • 11.7. BRAND GMBH + CO KG
  • 11.8. Kollodis BioSciences Inc
  • 11.9. DenovoMATRIX
  • 11.10. faCellitate

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

12. Appendix

  • 12.1. About Us and Services
  • 12.2. Contact Us