封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1325293

全球肉类形态测试市场 - 2023-2030

Global Meat Speciation Testing Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 122 Pages | 商品交期: 约2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

市场概况

全球肉类形态测试市场在 2022 年达到 19 亿美元,预计到 2030 年将达到 26 亿美元,2023-2030 年预测期间复合年增长率为 4.1%。

基于 DNA 的测试使科学家能够从一块肉中提取 DNA 并进行分析。通过将 DNA 序列与已知肉类物种的数据库进行比较,可以确定样品中存在的特定物种。物种鑑定涉及识别肉製品或样品中存在的特定物种。

下一代测序结果可以与包含来自不同肉类品种的已知基因的参考数据集进行比较。这种比较可以更准确地识别物种并验证下一代测序数据。质谱 (MS) 是一种强大的分析技术,用于初级肉类检测,用于识别和量化肉类样品中的蛋白质和肽。

肉类掺假是指故意添加劣质或廉价品种的肉类、非肉类产品或贴错标籤,以误导消费者或获取经济优势。 肉类特异性检测有助于确保市场上肉类产品的真实性和质量,保护消费者的健康和安全。信心。

市场动态

肉类食品欺诈事件的上升推动了肉类形态测试市场的发展

肉类行业中食品造假现像日益普遍,推动了用于检测肉类质量的肉类专用测试的销售。食品欺诈是指为了经济利益而故意歪曲或歪曲食品,给消费者造成严重健康风险的行为。行业声誉和公共卫生肉类产品特别容易受到被称为贴错标籤动物的欺诈行为的影响。欺诈性企业家可以通过用更便宜的肉类替代优质或更昂贵的品种来赚取巨额利润。

由于贴错标籤或掺假,肉类可能会以高价或以虚假藉口出售。肉类行业通常涉及復杂的供应链,有许多中介机构和流程。这些复杂性为欺诈活动创造了机会,因为整个供应链中肉类的来源和真实性很难确定。如果没有适当的分析,就很难确定肉製品的真实性和来源。如果没有适当的跟踪和记录,欺诈者很容易替换肉类品种或贴错标籤,导致供应链不负责任和缺乏透明度。这创造了对肉类形态测试的需求。

肉类形态测试检测方法的快速进步推动市场增长

用于初级肉类检测的肉类识别技术的快速发展在市场的增长中发挥着重要作用。准确、灵敏、高通量筛选方法开发的进步导致肉类品种分析应用和技术得到更多采用。基于 DNA 的分析、DNA 筛选技术(例如聚合酶炼式反应 (PCR) 和实时 PCR)的进步极大地提高了这些方法的准确性和灵敏度,以便检测和识别来自特定肉类品种的少量 DNA。

准确识别物种特异性标记的能力提供了可靠且值得信赖的结果,降低了错误标籤和欺诈行为的风险,因此快速检测方法的引入显着减少了肉类特异性测试所需的时间。传统技术,例如显微镜或血清学方法,通常涉及耗时的过程。然而,随着 PCR 等技术的进步,现在可以在几小时或几分钟内获得结果。更快的周转时间使食品製造商、监管机构和其他利益相关者能够及时做出决策,从而提高运营效率和食品安全。

肉类形态测试缺乏标准化阻碍了市场增长

在缺乏标准化测试方法的情况下,实验室可以采用自己的肉类特定测试程序和方法。这可能会导致测试方法的差异,从而导致结果和解释不一致。缺乏一致性使得很难在实验室之间比较和验证结果,从而阻碍了实践中的合作和统一。缺乏标准可能会损害依赖它的测试结果的准确性和能力。如果无法保证标准化方法,包括食品製造商、监管机构和消费者在内的利益相关者对测试结果的信心可能会有限。

这种信心的缺乏可能会导致市场增长放缓,因为它可能会阻碍对肉类研究的投资并影响采用。缺乏标准化方法使得很难比较和对比实验室或研究之间的测试结果。这限制了建立全行业指标和业务模型的能力。如果没有统一的框架,就很难评估测试应用程序和技术的效率和质量,从而阻碍市场增长。

COVID-19 影响

由于封锁、旅行限制和肉类加工厂的暂时关闭,全球肉类供应因疫情而受到干扰。这些问题影响了肉类产品的供应和分配,给开展初级肉类试验带来了挑战。样本量的下降和供应链的变化影响了研究工作的需求。 COVID-19 大流行加剧了消费者对食品安全和卫生的担忧。

因此,人们更加重视确保肉製品的安全性和真实性。初级肉类检测在验证标籤和解决这些严重的消费者担忧以识别任何潜在的掺假或失实陈述方面发挥着至关重要的作用。议会和政府短期内已对食品安全立法进行了修改,以应对大流行带来的挑战。

目录

第 1 章:方法和范围

  • 研究方法论
  • 报告的研究目的和范围

第 2 章:定义和概述

第 3 章:执行摘要

  • 按物种分类的片段
  • 技术片段
  • 按表格列出的片段
  • 按地区分類的片段

第 4 章:动力学

  • 影响因素
    • 司机
      • 肉类食品欺诈事件的上升推动了肉类形态测试市场的发展
      • 肉类形态测试检测方法的快速进步推动市场增长
    • 限制
      • 肉类形态测试缺乏标准化阻碍了市场增长
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第 5 章:行业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 监管分析

第 6 章:COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • 新冠疫情爆发前的情景
    • 新冠疫情期间的情景
    • 新冠疫情后的情景
  • COVID-19 期间的定价动态
  • 供需谱
  • 疫情期间政府与市场相关的倡议
  • 製造商战略倡议
  • 结论

第 7 章:按物种分类

  • 奶牛
  • 其他的

第 8 章:按技术

  • 聚合酶炼式反应
  • 酶联免疫吸附试验
  • 其他的

第 9 章:按形式

  • 生的
  • 熟的
  • 处理

第 10 章:按地区

  • 北美
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 意大利
    • 西班牙
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳大利亚
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第 11 章:竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 12 章:公司简介

  • Eurofins Scientific
    • 公司简介
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 主要进展
  • VWR International, LLC
  • Rapid Test Methods Ltd.
  • AB Sciex Pte. Ltd.
  • LGC Limited
  • Neogen Corporation
  • ALS
  • BioCheck Inc.
  • EnviroLogix
  • EMSL Analytical, Inc

第 13 章:附录

简介目录
Product Code: FB6623

Market Overview

Global Meat Speciation Testing Market reached US$ 1.9 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 2.6 billion by 2030 growing with a CAGR of 4.1% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

DNA-based testing allows scientists to extract DNA from a piece of meat and analyze it. By comparing the DNA sequence to a database of known meat species, the specific species present in the sample can be determined. Species identification involves identifying the specific species present in the meat product or sample.

Next-generation sequencing results can be compared with reference datasets containing known genes from different meat species. This comparison allows for more accurate species identification and validation of the next-generation sequencing data. Mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful analytical technique used in primary meat testing to identify and quantify proteins and peptides in meat samples.

Meat adulteration refers to the deliberate addition or mislabeling of inferior or cheaper varieties of meat, non-meat products, to mislead consumers or to gain economic advantage Meat specificity testing helps ensures the authenticity and quality of meat products on the market and protects consumer health and confidence.

Market Dynamics

Rising Incidences of Food Fraud in Meet Drives the Market of Meat Speciation Testing

The increasing prevalence of food fraud in the meat industry drives the sales of meat-specific tests to detect quality of the meat. Food fraud refers to the deliberate misrepresentation or distortion of food products for financial gain, causing serious health risk to consumers. Industry reputation and public health meat products are particularly vulnerable to fraudulent practices hear as mislabelled animals. Fraudulent entrepreneurs can make huge profits by substituting premium or more expensive varieties with cheaper meat.

By mislabeling or adulteration, meat can be sold at inflated prices or under false pretenses. The meat industry generally involves a complex supply chain with many intermediaries and processes. These complexities create opportunities for fraudulent activity, as the origin and authenticity of meat throughout the supply chain is difficult to determine. Without proper analysis, it can make it difficult to determine the authenticity and origin of meat products. Without proper tracking and documentation, fraudsters can easily substitute or mislabel meat varieties, leading to unaccountability and lack of transparency in the supply chain. This creates demand for the meat speciation testing.

Rapid Advancements in the Detection Methods of Meat Speciation Testing Drives Market Growth

Rapid development of meat identification techniques for primary meat testing plays a significant role in the growth of the market. Improvements in the development of accurate, sensitive, high-throughput screening methods have led to greater adoption of meat species analytical applications and technologies. Advances in DNA-based analysis, DNA screening techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR have greatly improved the accuracy and sensitivity of these methods in order to detect and identify even small amounts of DNA from specific meat species.

The ability to accurately identify species-specific markers provides reliable and trustworthy results, reducing the risk of mislabeling and fraudulent practices so the introduction of rapid detection methods has significantly reduced the time required for meat-specific testing. Traditional techniques, such as microscopy or serological methods, often involved time-consuming procedures. However, with advances in technology such as PCR, results can now be obtained in hours or minutes. Faster turnaround times allow food manufacturers, regulators, and other stakeholders to make timely decisions, increasing operational efficiency and food safety.

Lack of Standardization in Meat Speciation Testing Hampers Market Growth

In the absence of standardized test methods, laboratories may adopt their own meat-specific testing procedures and methods. This can lead to differences in test methods, leading to inconsistent results and interpretations. Lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare and validate results across laboratories, hindering cooperation and uniformity in practice. Lack of standards can compromise the accuracy and ability of test results relies on it. Stakeholders including food manufacturers, regulators, and consumers may have limited confidence in test results if there is no assurance of standardized methods.

This lack of confidence can provide market growth has slowed as it may discourage investment in meat research and compromise adoption. The lack of standardized methods makes it difficult to compare and contrast test results between laboratories or studies. This limits the ability to establish industry-wide metrics, and business models. Without a uniform framework, it is difficult to assess the efficiency and quality of testing applications and technologies, hindering market growth.

COVID-19 Impact

The global meat supply has been disrupted by the outbreak due to lockdowns, travel restrictions and the temporary closure of meat processing plants. These problems have affected the availability and distribution of meat products, creating challenges in developing primary meat trials. The decline in sample sizes and changes in the supply chain affected the demand for research work. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased consumer concerns about food safety and hygiene.

Consequently, more emphasis has been placed on ensuring the safety and authenticity of meat products. Primary meat testing plays a vital role in verifying labeling and addressing these acute consumer concerns to identify any potential adulteration or misrepresentation Parliamentary and governmental short-term has implemented changes in food safety legislation to address the challenges posed by the pandemic.

Segment Analysis

The global meat speciation testing market is segmented based on species, technology, form, and region.

Increase in the Consumers Demand for the Chicken Helps to Boost Segment Growth Over the Forecast Period.

The global meat speciation testing market by species has been segmented by cow, swine, chicken, horse, sheep and others.

Poultry meat specificity testing refers to a method for determining the origin of poultry meat products. This testing is necessary to ensure food safety, prevent fraud and comply with regulatory standards. Identifying a particular type of poultry can detect any adulteration. Stringent regulations and standards set by food safety authorities and regulatory agencies lead to specific inspection requirements in the poultry industry.

The purpose of these laws is to ensure labeling accuracy, prevent adulteration, and protect consumer health. Increased consumer awareness of food authenticity, sourcing, and the ethical concerns surrounding food production have increased the demand for accurate ethnic identification Consumers are increasingly interested in location identification whose food sources, including poultry and meat products. The poultry industry and those involved in the supply chain, including producers, processors, and retailers, prioritize quality control and inspection. Specification testing helps ensure quality, prevent substitution or contamination, and protect brand reputation.

Geographical Analysis

North America Region Held the Largest Share in Meat Speciation Testing Market

North America has well-established regulatory frameworks and strict food safety laws that emphasize accurate labeling and prevention of food fraud. These laws require specialized meat testing to ensure that they comply and protect consumers health. Developing countries in the region like United States and Canada has a robust food testing program, with specialized laboratories equipped with advanced technology. These facilities enable accurate and efficient primary meat testing, attracting businesses and consumers looking for reliable testing services.

The district has a robust food testing program, with specialized laboratories equipped with advanced technology. These facilities enable accurate and efficient primary meat testing, attracting businesses looking for reliable testing services. Consumers in region have recognized the authenticity, origin and quality of their food. This has led to the demand for meat-specific testing to verify claims and ensure products meet expectations.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Eurofins Scientific., VWR International, LLC, Rapid Test Methods Ltd., AB Sciex Pte. Ltd., LGC Limited, Neogen Corporation, ALS, BioCheck Inc., EnviroLogix and EMSL Analytical, Inc.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global meat speciation testing market segmentation based on species, technology, form, and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of meat speciation testing market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global meat speciation testing market report would provide approximately 61 tables, 60 figures and 122 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Species
  • 3.2. Snippet by Technology
  • 3.3. Snippet by Form
  • 3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Rising Incidences of Food Fraud in Meet Drives the Market of Meat Speciation Testing
      • 4.1.1.2. Rapid Advancements in the Detection Methods of Meat Speciation Testing Drives Market Growth
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Lack of Standardization in Meat Speciation Testing Hampers Market Growth
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Species

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Species
  • 7.2. Cow*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Swine
  • 7.4. Chicken
  • 7.5. Horse
  • 7.6. Sheep
  • 7.7. Others

8. By Technology

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
  • 8.2. PCR *
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. ELISA
  • 8.4. Others

9. By Form

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Form
  • 9.2. Raw*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Cooked
  • 9.4. Processed

10. By Region

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 10.2. North America
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
    • 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.2.6.1. The U.S.
      • 10.2.6.2. Canada
      • 10.2.6.3. Mexico
  • 10.3. Europe
    • 10.3.1. Introduction
    • 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
    • 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.3.6.1. Germany
      • 10.3.6.2. The U.K.
      • 10.3.6.3. France
      • 10.3.6.4. Italy
      • 10.3.6.5. Spain
      • 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
  • 10.4. South America
    • 10.4.1. Introduction
    • 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
    • 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.4.6.1. Brazil
      • 10.4.6.2. Argentina
      • 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
  • 10.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 10.5.1. Introduction
    • 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
    • 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form
    • 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 10.5.6.1. China
      • 10.5.6.2. India
      • 10.5.6.3. Japan
      • 10.5.6.4. Australia
      • 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 10.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 10.6.1. Introduction
    • 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Species
    • 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Form

11. Competitive Landscape

  • 11.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

  • 12.1. Eurofins Scientific*
    • 12.1.1. Company Overview
    • 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 12.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 12.1.4. Key Developments
  • 12.2. VWR International, LLC
  • 12.3. Rapid Test Methods Ltd.
  • 12.4. AB Sciex Pte. Ltd.
  • 12.5. LGC Limited
  • 12.6. Neogen Corporation
  • 12.7. ALS
  • 12.8. BioCheck Inc.
  • 12.9. EnviroLogix
  • 12.10. EMSL Analytical, Inc

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

  • 13.1. About Us and Services
  • 13.2. Contact Us