封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1325375

全球船桥模拟器市场 - 2023-2030

Global Ship Bridge Simulator Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 192 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

市场概况

全球船桥模拟器市场于2022年达到22亿美元,预计到2030年将达到31亿美元,2023-2030年预测期间复合年增长率为6.4%。

由于海事行业对先进培训和模拟系统的需求不断增长,全球船桥模拟器市场正在经历显着增长。船桥模拟器为培训船员并在现实和身临其境的环境中提高他们的技能提供了一个安全且经济高效的平台。

近年来,海运业见证了重大技术进步和全球贸易活动的增加。各个因素导致人们更加关注安全和效率,促使船东和培训机构投资船桥模拟器。

交互式船桥模拟器细分市场在该类型细分市场中占据主导地位,经历了快速增长并占据了一半以上的市场份额。显着的增长可归因于技术的进步和对海上安全的需求不断增长。同样,北美在船桥模拟器系统市场中占有最大的市场份额,占总市场份额的三分之一以上。北美在船桥模拟器系统市场中展现出巨大的潜力,这主要是由于海事技术的进步以及对海事人员有效培训和评估的需要。

市场动态

专注于具有成本效益的培训和技术进步

面对不断上升的运营成本和对高效培训方法的需求,船桥模拟器为海上培训提供了一种经济高效的解决方案。传统的船上培训可能既耗时又昂贵,需要大量资源,并对船员和船舶都构成风险。船桥模拟器允许学员重复练习各种场景,而不会对船舶、船员或环境造成任何实际风险。澳大利亚海事安全局 (AMSA) 已经认识到模拟器在降低培训成本和增强技能发展方面的价值。

船桥模拟器市场见证了技术的快速进步,推动了其在各种海事机构和组织中的采用。现代模拟器配备了最先进的技术,包括高分辨率可视化系统、先进的运动平台和实时天气模拟。各自的进步使船桥模拟器高度逼真,为学员提供了紧密复製现实世界场景的身临其境的体验。

各国政府和监管机构还通过赠款和补贴鼓励采用先进的模拟器。例如,欧盟 (EU) 一直通过 Horizo​​n 2020 框架等资助计划支持海事模拟技术的研究和开发计划。

海事培训的进步和对船舶操纵技能的需求不断增长

促进船桥模拟器市场增长的关键驱动因素之一是越来越注重提高海事培训和安全标准。随着船舶运营的复杂性不断增加以及对熟练航海员的需求不断增加,船桥模拟器已成为实践培训的重要工具。

世界各国政府和海事监管机构一直强调船员培训和使用模拟器提高船舶操作技能的重要性。根据国际海事组织 (IMO) 的规定,培训、认证和值班标准 (STCW) 公约强制规定使用模拟器进行培训。

STCW 公约制定了海员培训和认证的标准,并强制要求使用模拟器来提供真实有效的培训,确保安全航行和船舶运营。全球航运业对能够在各种具有挑战性的条件下操纵船舶的熟练航海员的需求激增。

船桥模拟器提供了一个无风险的环境,可以在恶劣的天气条件、狭窄的航道和拥挤的港口等复杂场景下练习船舶操纵。对安全航行、燃油效率和减少环境影响的日益重视进一步扩大了对综合船舶操纵培训的需求。

发展中地区初始投资成本高且可及性有限

船桥模拟器市场面临的主要限制之一是与先进模拟器系统的采购和安装相关的初始投资成本高昂。复杂的模拟器需要最先进的硬件和软件组件来创建真实且身临其境的培训环境。

此外,维护和更新这些系统的成本可能很高,增加了模拟器操作员的总体费用。根据国际海事组织 (IMO) 的一份报告,全任务船舶桥樑模拟器的初始投资可达 200 万美元至 500 万美元,具体取决于系统的复杂性和功能。各自巨大的前期成本通常会阻碍小型海事培训机构和发展中国家投资此类先进的模拟器技术。

船桥模拟器市场的另一个重要限制是模拟器在发展中地区的可及性和渗透率有限。虽然发达国家已经建立了设备齐全的海上训练设施,但许多发展中国家缺乏必要的基础设施和资金来投资先进的模拟器系统。

这各自造成了模拟器培训机会分布不均,并阻碍了整体市场的增长。世界银行的统计数据显示,低收入国家的海事培训设施不太普及,其中只有 18% 的国家拥有先进的模拟器技术。相比之下,高收入国家配备模拟器的海上培训设施覆盖率高达 82%。各自的差异表明需要增加支持和资金,以促进发展中地区船桥模拟器市场的增长。

COVID-19 影响分析

COVID-19 大流行给全球各个行业留下了不可磨灭的印记,海事部门也不例外。在海上培训和安全中发挥着关键作用的全球船桥模拟器市场也受到了疫情的影响。船桥模拟器是海事专业人员用来模拟现实生活场景并提高其导航、通信和决策技能的先进培训工具。

这些模拟器复製了船舶的驾驶台和周围环境,为各种场景(包括导航、船舶装卸和紧急情况)的培训提供了安全且经济高效的平台。来自国际海事组织 (IMO) 等海事监管机构的政府数据可以为全球船桥模拟器市场的增长趋势和挑战提供有价值的见解。

随着疫情在全球蔓延,旅行限制和封锁措施严重影响了海上训练活动。许多培训机构和海事院校被迫暂停或减少现场培训项目。培训计划的中断导致对船桥模拟器的需求下降,影响了大流行期间的市场增长。

目录

第 1 章:方法和范围

  • 研究方法论
  • 报告的研究目的和范围

第 2 章:定义和概述

第 3 章:执行摘要

  • 按类型分類的片段
  • 解决方案片段
  • 按组织规模分類的片段
  • 最终用户的片段
  • 按地区分類的片段

第 4 章:动力学

  • 影响因素
    • 司机
      • 专注于具有成本效益的培训和技术进步
      • 海事培训的进步和对船舶操纵技能的需求不断增长
    • 限制
      • 发展中地区初始投资成本高且可及性有限
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第 5 章:行业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 监管分析

第 6 章:COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • 新冠疫情爆发前的情景
    • 新冠疫情期间的情景
    • 新冠疫情后的情景
  • COVID-19 期间的定价动态
  • 供需谱
  • 疫情期间政府与市场相关的倡议
  • 製造商战略倡议
  • 结论

第 7 章:按类型

  • 交互式船桥模拟器
  • 非交互式船桥模拟器

第 8 章:通过解决方案

  • 现场培训
  • 专业培训
  • 建设性培训
  • 虚拟培训
  • 系统培训
  • 游戏模拟训练

第 9 章:按组织规模

  • 大型组织
  • 中型组织
  • 小型组织

第 10 章:最终用户

  • 海洋
  • 教育性

第 11 章:按地区

  • 北美
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 意大利
    • 俄罗斯
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳大利亚
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第 12 章:竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 13 章:公司简介

  • Wartsila
    • 公司简介
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 主要进展
  • Rheinmetall AG
  • General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
  • AVEVA Group plc
  • Presagis Canada Inc.
  • ST Engineering
  • BMT Group Ltd
  • ARI Simulation
  • PC Maritime
  • FORCE TECHNOLOGY

第 14 章:附录

简介目录
Product Code: ICT6599

Market Overview

Global Ship Bridge Simulator Market reached US$ 2.2 billion in 2022 and is expected to reach US$ 3.1 billion by 2030, growing with a CAGR of 6.4% during the forecast period 2023-2030.

The global ship bridge simulator market is experiencing remarkable growth, driven by the increasing demand for advanced training and simulation systems in the maritime industry. ship bridge simulator provides a safe and cost-effective platform for training ship crews and enhancing their skills in a realistic and immersive environment.

In recent years, the maritime industry has witnessed significant technological advancements and an upswing in global trade activities. The respective factors have led to an increased focus on safety and efficiency, prompting shipowners and training institutes to invest in ship bridge simulators.

The interactive ship bridge simulators segment dominates the type segment, experiencing rapid growth and capturing over half of the market share. The remarkable growth can be attributed to advancements in technology and rising demand for maritime safety. In a similar vein, the North America holds the largest market share in the ship bridge simulator system market, accounting for over one-third of the total market share. North America exhibits vast potential in the ship bridge simulator system market, primarily due to advancements in maritime technology and the need for effective training and evaluation of maritime personnel.

Market Dynamics

Focus on Cost-Effective Training and Technological Advancements

In the face of rising operational costs and the need for efficient training methods, ship bridge simulators offer a cost-effective solution for maritime training. Traditional onboard training can be time-consuming and expensive, requiring significant resources and posing risks to both crew and vessel. Ship bridge simulators allow trainees to practice various scenarios repeatedly without any actual risk to vessels, crew, or the environment. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has recognized the value of simulators in reducing training costs and enhancing skill development.

The ship bridge simulator market has witnessed rapid technological advancements, driving its adoption across various maritime institutions and organizations. Modern simulators are equipped with state-of-the-art technology, including high-resolution visualization systems, advanced motion platforms, and real-time weather simulations. The respective advancements have made ship bridge simulators highly realistic, providing trainees with an immersive experience that closely replicates real-world scenarios.

Governments and regulatory bodies are also encouraging the adoption of advanced simulators through grants and subsidies. For instance, the European Union (EU) has been supporting research and development initiatives in maritime simulation technology through funding programs such as the Horizon 2020 framework.

Advancements in Maritime Training and Rising Demand for Vessel Maneuvering Skills

One of the key drivers contributing to the growth of the ship bridge simulator market is the increasing focus on enhancing maritime training and safety standards. With the rising complexities in ship operations and the need for skilled navigators, ship bridge simulators have emerged as crucial tools for hands-on training.

Governments and maritime regulatory authorities worldwide have been emphasizing the importance of competent crew training and the use of simulators to improve ship handling skills. According to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the application of simulators for training purposes is mandated under the Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping (STCW) convention.

The STCW convention sets the standards for the training and certification of seafarers and mandates the use of simulators to provide realistic and efficient training, ensuring safe navigation and ship operation. The global shipping industry has witnessed a surge in the demand for skilled navigators capable of maneuvering vessels in various challenging conditions.

Ship bridge simulators offer a risk-free environment to practice ship handling in complex scenarios, such as adverse weather conditions, narrow channels, and congested ports. The increasing emphasis on safe navigation, fuel efficiency, and reduced environmental impact has further amplified the demand for comprehensive ship handling training.

High Initial Investment Costs and Limited Accessibility in Developing Regions

One of the primary restraints faced by the ship bridge simulator market is the high initial investment costs associated with the procurement and installation of advanced simulator systems. The sophisticated simulators require state-of-the-art hardware and software components to create a realistic and immersive training environment.

Additionally, the cost of maintaining and updating these systems can be substantial, adding to the overall expenses for simulator operators. According to a report by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), the initial investment for a full mission ship bridge simulator can range from US$ 2 million to US$ 5 million, depending on the complexity and features of the system. The respective significant upfront cost often deters smaller maritime training institutes and developing countries from investing in such advanced simulator technologies.

Another significant restraint for the ship bridge simulator market is the limited accessibility and penetration of simulators in developing regions. While developed countries have established well-equipped maritime training facilities, many developing nations lack the necessary infrastructure and funding to invest in advanced simulator systems.

The respective creates an uneven distribution of simulator training opportunities and hampers the overall market growth. Statistics from the World Bank reveal that maritime training facilities are less prevalent in low-income countries, with only 18% of these countries having access to advanced simulator technologies. In contrast, high-income countries boast an 82% coverage of maritime training facilities equipped with simulators. The respective disparity points to the need for increased support and funding to facilitate the growth of the ship bridge simulator market in developing regions.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The COVID-19 pandemic has left an indelible mark on various industries worldwide, and the maritime sector is no exception. The global ship bridge simulator market, which plays a critical role in maritime training and safety, has also felt the effects of the pandemic. Ship bridge simulators are advanced training tools used by maritime professionals to simulate real-life scenarios and enhance their navigation, communication, and decision-making skills.

These simulators replicate the ship's bridge and surrounding environment, offering a safe and cost-effective platform for training in various scenarios, including navigation, ship handling, and emergencies. Government data from maritime regulatory bodies, such as the International Maritime Organization (IMO), can provide valuable insights into the global ship bridge simulator market's growth trends and challenges.

As the pandemic spread globally, travel restrictions and lockdown measures severely impacted maritime training activities. Many training institutions and maritime academies were forced to suspend or reduce their on-site training programs. This disruption in training schedules led to a decline in the demand for ship bridge simulators, affecting the market's growth during the pandemic.

Segment Analysis

The global ship bridge simulator market is segmented based on type, solution, organization size, end-user and region.

Advancements in Technology

Ship bridge simulators are advanced training tools that replicate real-life scenarios and enable maritime professionals to develop essential navigational skills and enhance decision-making abilities in a risk-free environment. Among the various segments of the ship bridge simulator market, interactive ship bridge simulators stand out as a key driver of growth. Interactive ship bridge simulators are sophisticated training systems that provide a realistic and immersive experience for seafarers.

The aforementioned simulators are equipped with cutting-edge technologies, including high-definition displays, advanced navigation systems, and realistic sound effects, to recreate various maritime scenarios accurately. Interactive ship bridge simulators enable trainees to practice ship handling, navigation, and emergency response in a controlled environment, thereby enhancing their skills and confidence before they encounter real-life situations at sea.

The rapid advancements in technology have played a pivotal role in driving the growth of interactive ship bridge simulators. With the integration of state-of-the-art hardware and software components, these simulators offer a highly realistic and interactive training experience. The incorporation of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies has further elevated the level of immersion and engagement, making the training process more effective and enjoyable for trainees.

Geographical Analysis

Booming Maritime Industry in North America

Ship bridge simulators are sophisticated tools that replicate real-life scenarios, offering a safe and controlled environment for training, navigation practice, and emergency response exercises. North America, comprising countries such as U.S. and Canada, has emerged as a key player in the global ship bridge simulator market.

The region's dominant position can be attributed to various factors, including robust maritime infrastructure, a strong emphasis on safety and training standards, and significant investments in maritime education and research. Government sources provide valuable statistics and insights into North America's contribution to the global ship bridge simulator market, showcasing its remarkable growth and importance in the maritime industry.

Further, North America is home to some of the world's busiest and most strategic ports, making it a vital hub for international maritime trade. Ports like Los Angeles, Long Beach, New York-New Jersey, and Vancouver handle massive cargo volumes, facilitating global supply chains and trade networks. According to the United States Census Bureau, the total value of U.S. imports and exports amounted to US$ 4.9 trillion in 2020. The respective thriving maritime trade has fueled the demand for highly skilled and well-trained marine personnel, driving the adoption of ship bridge simulators for efficient training and assessment.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Wartsila, Rheinmetall AG, General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., AVEVA Group plc, Presagis Canada Inc., ST Engineering, BMT Group Ltd, ARI Simulation, PC Maritime and FORCE TECHNOLOGY.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global ship bridge simulator market segmentation based on type, solution, organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of ship bridge simulator market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global ship bridge simulator market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 61 figures and 192 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Type
  • 3.2. Snippet by Solution
  • 3.3. Snippet by Organization Size
  • 3.4. Snippet by End-User
  • 3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Focus on Cost-Effective Training and Technological Advancements
      • 4.1.1.2. Advancements in Maritime Training and Rising Demand for Vessel Maneuvering Skills
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. High Initial Investment Costs and Limited Accessibility in Developing Regions
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
    • 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
    • 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
  • 6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
  • 7.2. Interactive Ship Bridge Simulators*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Non-Interactive Ship Bridge Simulators

8. By Solution

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Solution
  • 8.2. Live Training*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Professional Training
  • 8.4. Constructive Training
  • 8.5. Virtual Training
  • 8.6. System Training
  • 8.7. Game Simulation Training

9. By Organization Size

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
  • 9.2. Large Scale Organizations*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Medium Scale Organizations
  • 9.4. Small Scale Organizations

10. By End-User

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 10.2. Marine*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Educational

11. By Region

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2. North America
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1. U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2. Canada
      • 11.2.7.3. Mexico
  • 11.3. Europe
    • 11.3.1. Introduction
    • 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1. Germany
      • 11.3.7.2. UK
      • 11.3.7.3. France
      • 11.3.7.4. Italy
      • 11.3.7.5. Russia
      • 11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
  • 11.4. South America
    • 11.4.1. Introduction
    • 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1. Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2. Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3. Rest of South America
  • 11.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1. Introduction
    • 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1. China
      • 11.5.7.2. India
      • 11.5.7.3. Japan
      • 11.5.7.4. Australia
      • 11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1. Introduction
    • 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
    • 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Solution
    • 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
    • 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. Wartsila*
    • 13.1.1. Company Overview
    • 13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4. Key Developments
  • 13.2. Rheinmetall AG
  • 13.3. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.
  • 13.4. AVEVA Group plc
  • 13.5. Presagis Canada Inc.
  • 13.6. ST Engineering
  • 13.7. BMT Group Ltd
  • 13.8. ARI Simulation
  • 13.9. PC Maritime
  • 13.10. FORCE TECHNOLOGY

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

  • 14.1. About Us and Services
  • 14.2. Contact Us