首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 食物/饮料

区块链

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1423445

农业市场的全球区块链 - 2023-2030

Global Blockchain in Agriculture Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: 2024年02月09日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 186 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

2022年，全球区块链农业市场规模达1.5812亿美元，预计2030年将达到2.541亿美元，2023-2030年预测期间CAGR为6.2%。

多年来，农业市场的全球区块链见证了显着的成长和变革，区块链技术产量不断增加，可以提供有关植物、种子品质和作物生长的资讯。此外，它甚至可以提供从种子到消费者的供应链资讯。因此，这些因素有助于推动全球农业区块链的发展。

此外，区块链可以帮助验证高价值农作物的真实性和来源，例如有机或公平贸易产品。这可以建立消费者信任并防止欺诈性索赔。追踪和可追溯技术可以帮助轻鬆识别食品安全，从而增加农业中区块链的采用。

此外，许多製造企业正在利用这种区块链技术为消费者提供高品质的产品和透明的资讯。例如，* 2020 年 4 月，IBM 和雀巢建立了合作伙伴关係，使雀巢能够使用 IBM 食品信託企业区块链来追踪其 Zoegas 咖啡品牌。这款咖啡将配备二维码扫描仪，以帮助消费者追踪咖啡豆的来源。 IBM食品信託企业区块链将记录有关农民的资料、收穫时间、特定发货的交易证书以及烘焙时间。

动力学

对智慧农业实践的需求增加

随着消费者对了解食物的来源和生产方式越来越感兴趣，农业中对区块链的需求正在增加，因为它提供了可以记录的产品旅程每个阶段的信息，从种植到收穫、加工、包装和分布。这样可以在出现污染或品质问题时快速且准确地进行追溯，这对于确保食品安全和满足监管要求至关重要。

此外，许多关键参与者都致力于开发创新技术，以便为客户提供精确的资讯。例如，2020 年7 月，JM Smucker Company 品牌透过其100% 哥伦比亚咖啡包装产品850 (R) Coffee 与Farmer Connect 合作，现在客户可以在一个为提高可追溯性而创建的平台上使用IBM 的区块链科技来追踪咖啡的原产地，咖啡供应链的效率和公平性。

对供应链透明度的需求上升

随着消费者对所购买产品的原产地、生产方法和道德考虑更加了解，对供应链透明度的需求不断增加，这增加了农业对区块链的需求，因为它提供了更透明和准确的质量资讯产品的特征，也有助于轻鬆识别食品污染物，有助于提高食品安全。因此，这些因素导致区块链技术的采用增加。

此外，许多国家政府正在采取倡议，提高消费者对区块链的可用性。例如，2023 年 6 月，泰米尔纳德邦资讯科技和数位服务部长为国家电子政府培训中心揭幕，并启动了 Nambikkai Inaiyam (NI)。符合资格的各方将使用该区块链来建立透明、高效和安全的以公民为中心的组织间工作流程。企业级G2G和G2C产品和服务将使用此基础设施来实施。 NI 平台也将充当政府部门和公共部门组织、机构和公司的区块链即服务 (BAAS) 提供者。此类倡议有助于提高采用率。

消费者缺乏认知

消费者和利害关係人缺乏认识可能会导致对采用新技术的抵制，这可能会延迟产业的转型和区块链潜在好处的实现。这可能会导致区块链技术研究和开发的资金减少。因此，这可能会导致市场成长下降。

此外，由于对区块链技术的认识较少，许多製造商甚至不知道政府的计划。例如，2021 年 12 月，印度政府电子与资讯技术部启动了国家区块链计画。国家区块链框架将用于农业供应链、电子健康记录、教育证书链、药品供应链等不同领域的区块链应用的开发和大规模託管。该基础设施将用于提供区块链作为- a-服务。

The global blockchain in the agriculture market has witnessed significant growth and transformations over the years, as blockchain technology has increased in production as can provide information about plants, seed quality, and crop growth. Also, it can even provide information about the supply chain, from seed to consumer. Hence, such factors can help in driving the global blockchain in agriculture.

Furthermore, blockchain can help in verifying the authenticity and provenance of high-value crops, such as organic or fair-trade products. This builds consumer trust and prevents fraudulent claims. The tracking and traceability technology can help in the easy identification of food safety, it can lead to an increase in the adoption of blockchain in agriculture.

Additionally, many manufacturing companies are using this blockchain technology to provide consumers with high-quality products and transparent information. For instance, * In April 2020, IBM and Nestle had a partnership that enables nestle to use the IBM food trust enterprise blockchain to trace its Zoegas coffee brand. This coffee would come in a QR code scanner to help the consumers trace coffee beans for their origin. The IBM food trust enterprise blockchain will record the data about the farmers, time of harvest, transaction certificate for specific shipments as well as roasting period.

Dynamics

Increase in Demand for Smart Agriculture Practices

As consumers are interested in knowing where their food comes from and how it's produced is increasing, the demand for blockchain in agriculture is raising, as it provides information about each stage of a product's journey can be recorded, from planting to harvesting, processing, packaging, and distribution. This enables quick and accurate traceability in case of contamination or quality issues, which is essential for ensuring food safety and meeting regulatory requirements.

Furthermore, many key players are focusing to produce innovative technologies in order to provide customers with precise information. For instance, in July 2020, J. M. Smucker Company brand through its 100% Colombian Coffee packaged product, 850® Coffee collaborating with Farmer Connect, now Customers can now track their coffee's origin using IBM's blockchain technology on a platform created to improve traceability, efficiency, and fairness in the coffee supply chain.

The Rise in Demand for Supply Chain Transparency

The demand for transparency in the supply chain is increasing as consumers are more conscious about the origin, production methods, and ethical considerations of the products they purchase, which increases the demand for blockchain in agriculture as it provides more transparent and accurate information about the quality of the product and also helps in easy identification of food contaminants and helps in increasing the food safety. Hence, such factors lead to an increase in the adoption of blockchain technology.

Furthermore, many country governments are taking initiatives to increase the availability of blockchain to consumers. For instance, in June 2023, the Minister for Information Technology and Digital Services of Tamil Nadu inaugurated the State Training Centre for e-Governance and launched Nambikkai Inaiyam (NI). This blockchain will be used by qualifying parties to build transparent, efficient and secure citizen-centric and inter-organizational workflows. Enterprise-grade G2G and G2C products and services will be implemented using this infrastructure. The NI platform will also function as a Blockchain As A Service (BAAS) provider to Government departments and Public sector organizations, agencies and companies. Such initiatives can help in increasing the adoption rate.

Lack of awareness among the Consumers

The lack of awareness among consumers, and stakeholders can lead to resistance to adopting new technologies This could delay the transformation of the industry and the realization of the potential benefits that blockchain. This could lead to decrease funding for research and development of blockchain technologies. Hence, it could lead to declination in market growth.

Furthermore, due to less awareness about blockchain technologies, many manufacturers are not even aware of government schemes. For instance, in December 2021, the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology Government of India launched a National Scheme on Blockchain. National Blockchain Framework would be used for the development and large-scale hosting of Blockchain applications in different areas such as agriculture supply chain, electronic health records, education certificate chain, drug supply chain, etc. This infrastructure will be used for providing Blockchain-as-a-Service.

Segment Analysis

The global blockchain in the agriculture market is segmented based on type, stakeholders, providers, organization size, distribution channel, application and region.

Raising in Demand for Effective Blockchain Management

Product traceability, visibility, and tracking segment hold the largest share in the global blockchain in agriculture, as the blockchain can provide traceable tamper-proof information about the product in every step of the supply chain, it also helps in reducing food safety issues as it can helps in quick identification of problems. This also provides all stakeholders with up-to-date visibility into the status and location of products, improving coordination and decision-making.

Furthermore, many manufacturing companies are producing innovative products in order to attract a larger consumer basis. For instance, J.M Smucker uses the IBM blockchain to trace coffee beans of the 1850 Brand. Smucker will use a blockchain to trace Colombian coffee beans while letting consumers make donations to coffee farmers in Colombia. Such products can help increase adoption of blockchain.

Geographical Penetration

Increase in Research and development and Presence of vast agricultural land

North America has been a dominant force in the global blockchain in the agriculture market and its significance has only grown in the post-2020 era. The demand for blockchain technology is raising in this region as consumers in this region are demanding efficient information regarding the origin, food processing, and distribution, which leads to an increase in the adoption rate for blockchain in this region.

Furthermore, the market in this region is majorly driving as the key players' companies are producing a wide variety of products and increasing research and development of blockchain technologies in this region due to the larger consumer base is helping in increasing the global blockchain in the agriculture market.

Additionally, the presence of vast agricultural land can help increase in the adoption of blockchain in agriculture as it can provide exact information about the plants, seed quality, crop growth, and information on the tracking of seeds from farms to consumers. For instance, according to the US Department of Agriculture report of 20221, the United States has approximately 911 million acres of agricultural land.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include IBM Corporation, TE-FOOD International GmbH, Arc-Net, iTrust, SAP SA, Origintrail, Ripe Technology, Inc, Grain Chain, Inc, Bitfury Group Limited and Amazon Web Services.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

The pandemic had brought a positive impact on the global blockchain in the agriculture market. During the pandemic, people become more conscious about food safety, and processing, which has raised the demand for precision tracking and traceability of products. But due to government lockdown restrictions, the distribution chain has been disrupted.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has brought a disruption in countries' economies many manufacturing companies are had been shut down due to less employment ratio, exports and imports rate, which had shown a negative impact on the adoption rate and distribution channel.

By Type

Public
Private
Hybrid/Consortium

By Stakeholders

Growers
Food Manufacturers/Processors
Retailers
Others

By Providers

Application and Solution
Middleware Infrastructure
Protocol Provider
Others

By Organization Size

Small and medium-sized enterprises
Large enterprises

By Distribution Channel

Company Stores
E-Commerce
Others

By Application

Product traceability, tracking and visibility
Payment and settlement
Smart contract
Governance, risk and compliance management

By Region

North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In August 2020, The renowned blockchain platform Quorum from JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM.N) has been bought by Brooklyn-based technology firm ConsenSys.
In June 2020, the Atea, IBM, sjomatbedriftene, has announced a new cross-industry collaboration to use blockchain technology and share supply chain data throughout the Norway's seafood industry which helps in providing safer, better seafood to consumers.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global blockchain in agriculture market segmentation based on type, and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of blockchain in agriculture market-level with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global blockchain in agriculture market report would provide approximately 85 tables, 89 figures and 186 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Type
3.2. Snippet by Stakeholders
3.3. Snippet by Providers
3.4. Snippet by Organization Size
3.5. Snippet by Distribution Channel
3.6. Snippet by Application
3.7. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. Increase in demand for smart agriculture practices
  - 4.1.1.2. Rise in demand for supply chain transparency
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. Lack of awareness among consumers
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis

6. COVID-19 Analysis

6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID
- 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID
- 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
7.2. Public*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Private
7.4. Hybrid/consortium

8. By Stakeholders

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Stakeholders
8.2. Growers*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Food Manufactures/Processors
8.4. Retailers
8.5. Others

9. By Providers

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Providers
9.2. Application and Solution*
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3. Middleware Infrastructure
9.4. Protocol Providers
9.5. Others

10. By Organization Size

10.1. Introduction
- 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
10.2. Small and Medium-sized enterprises*
- 10.2.1. Introduction
- 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
10.3. Large Enterprises

11. By Distribution Chnannel

11.1. Introduction
- 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Distribution Channel
11.2. Company Stores*
- 11.2.1. Introduction
- 11.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
11.3. E-Commerce
11.4. Others

12. By Application

12.1. Introduction
- 12.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 12.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
12.2. Product traceability,treacking and visibility*
- 12.2.1. Introduction
- 12.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
12.3. Payment and Settlement
12.4. Smart contract

Governance,risk and compliance management

13. By Region

13.1. Introduction
- 13.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 13.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
13.2. North America
- 13.2.1. Introduction
- 13.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 13.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 13.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
- 13.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
- 13.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 13.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 13.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 13.2.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 13.2.9.1. U.S.
  - 13.2.9.2. Canada
  - 13.2.9.3. Mexico
13.3. Europe
- 13.3.1. Introduction
- 13.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 13.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 13.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
- 13.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
- 13.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 13.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 13.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 13.3.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 13.3.9.1. Germany
  - 13.3.9.2. UK
  - 13.3.9.3. France
  - 13.3.9.4. Italy
  - 13.3.9.5. Russia
  - 13.3.9.6. Rest of Europe
13.4. South America
- 13.4.1. Introduction
- 13.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 13.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 13.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
- 13.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
- 13.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 13.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 13.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 13.4.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 13.4.9.1. Brazil
  - 13.4.9.2. Argentina
  - 13.4.9.3. Rest of South America
13.5. Asia-Pacific
- 13.5.1. Introduction
- 13.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 13.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 13.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
- 13.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
- 13.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 13.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 13.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 13.5.9. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 13.5.9.1. China
  - 13.5.9.2. India
  - 13.5.9.3. Japan
  - 13.5.9.4. Australia
  - 13.5.9.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
13.6. Middle East and Africa
- 13.6.1. Introduction
- 13.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 13.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 13.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Stakeholders
- 13.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Providers
- 13.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 13.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 13.6.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

14. Competitive Landscape

14.1. Competitive Scenario
14.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
14.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

15. Company Profiles

15.1. IBM corporation*
- 15.1.1. Company Overview
- 15.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 15.1.3. Financial Overview
- 15.1.4. Key Developments
15.2. TE-FOOD International GmbH.
15.3. Arc-Net
15.4. iTrust
15.5. SAP SA
15.6. Origintrail
15.7. Ripe Technology, Inc
15.8. GrainChain, Inc
15.9. Bitfury Group Limited
15.10. Amazon Web Services

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

16. Appendix

16.1. About Us and Services
16.2. Contact Us

02-2729-4219

+886-2-2729-4219

License/价格

农业市场的全球区块链 - 2023-2030

Global Blockchain in Agriculture Market - 2023-2030

目录

第 1 章：方法与范围

第 2 章：定义与概述

第 3 章：执行摘要

第 4 章：动力学

第 5 章：产业分析

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

第 7 章：按类型

第 8 章：利害关係人

第 9 章：由提供者提供

第 10 章：依组织规模

第 11 章：按分销管道

第 12 章：按应用

第 13 章：按地区

第14章：竞争格局

第 15 章：公司简介

第 16 章：附录