首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 材料

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1448008

土壤稳定市场 - 2023-2030

Soil Stabilization Market - 2023-2030

出版日期: 2024年03月08日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 247 Pages | 商品交期: 约2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

2022年，全球土壤稳定市场达到208.9亿美元，预计2030年将达到313亿美元，2023-2030年预测期间CAGR为5.2%。

对永续性和环保建筑实践的日益关注正在推动土壤稳定技术的采用。这些方法有助于最大限度地减少对环境的影响，减少水土流失，促进土地的有效利用，与全球实现更永续的基础设施发展的努力保持一致。

已开发经济体和发展中经济体对道路、高速公路、机场和港口等基础设施项目的投资推动了对土壤稳定解决方案的需求。这些项目通常需要坚固而稳定的地基，因此土壤稳定是一个重要组成部分。根据美国农业部 (USDA) 统计，美国 90% 以上的建设项目都涉及土壤稳定，而 USGS（美国地质调查局）预计土壤稳定技术可降低建设成本高达 20%。

持续的研究和开发工作正在推动先进土壤稳定材料和添加剂的开发。土工合成材料、生物聚合物和其他专用添加剂的创新正在提高稳定技术的有效性并扩大其应用。根据 Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani、Hamed Niroumand 和 Lech Balachowski 所做的研究，使用微米级和奈米级膨润土作为土壤稳定剂来提高黏土砂的强度。

动力学

提高对土壤稳定益处的认识

土壤稳定技术有助于防止水土流失，这对于维护生态系统、农田和建筑工地的良好健康至关重要。根据全球农业统计，预计每年有 240 亿吨的肥沃土壤因侵蚀而流失。联合国粮农组织称，农业土壤侵蚀导致农业产量减少 50%。土壤稳定可以增强土壤的物理、化学和生物特性，进而提高保水性、养分利用率和整体土壤健康。这进一步改善了植物生长并提高了作物产量。

土壤稳定技术有助于防止水土流失，使土壤不易被风或水带走。这对于维护农地的完整性、防止表土流失和确保永续的土地利用至关重要。稳定的土壤更能抵抗干旱或大雨等恶劣天气条件。这种适应性可以帮助农民减少气候变迁对其作物和农业产量的影响。

基础建设发展

道路、高速公路、桥樑、机场、港口和铁路等基础设施项目需要稳定而坚固的地基，以确保其长期耐用性和功能性。土壤稳定技术在准备施工场地和解决这些项目期间可能出现的与土壤相关的挑战方面发挥着至关重要的作用。根据美国农业部 (USDA) 统计，美国 90% 以上的建设项目都涉及土壤固化，而 USGS（美国地质调查局）预计，土壤固化技术可降低高达 20% 的建筑成本，具体取决于项目类型和其他因素。

基础设施项目通常涉及重型和复杂结构的建设。适当的土壤稳定可确保地基能够支撑这些结构的重量和承载要求，以防止沉降、不均匀沉降和结构破坏。

土壤稳定添加剂和技术成本高

土壤稳定技术的实施可能涉及大量的前期成本，包括与设备、材料和熟练劳动力相关的费用。例如，根据《国际工程技术研究期刊》(IRJET) 的报告，要稳定 10 立方公尺的土壤，水泥稳定的平均成本为 10,912 卢比。这些成本可能会阻止一些建设项目或土地开发计划采用土壤稳定方法，特别是在预算紧张的情况下。

农民可能不完全了解土壤稳定的好处或潜在的投资回报。高昂的前期成本可能会阻碍他们探索或采取这些做法，特别是如果他们不知道长期优势的话。

Increasing focus on sustainability and environmentally friendly construction practices is driving the adoption of soil stabilization techniques. These methods help minimize environmental impact, reduce soil erosion, and promote efficient land use, aligning with global efforts to achieve more sustainable infrastructure development.

Investments in infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, airports, and ports, in both developed and developing economies drive the demand for soil stabilization solutions. These projects often require strong and stable foundations, making soil stabilization an essential component. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%.

Ongoing research and development efforts are leading to the development of advanced soil stabilization materials and additives. Innovations in geosynthetics, biopolymers, and other specialized additives are enhancing the effectiveness of stabilization techniques and expanding their applications. As per the research done by Mohadeseh Cheraghalikhani, Hamed Niroumand & Lech Balachowski, micro- and nano-size bentonite as soil stabilizers are used to improve the strength of clayey sand.

Dynamics

Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion, which is essential for preserving the good health of ecosystems, agricultural fields, and construction sites. According to Global Agriculture, every year an expected 24 billion tons of fertile soil are lost due to erosion. FAO claims that soil erosion in agriculture reduces agricultural production by 50%. Soil stabilization can enhance the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the soil, resulting in better water retention, nutrient availability, and overall soil health. This further leads to improved plant growth and increased crop yields.

Soil stabilization techniques help prevent soil erosion making the soil less susceptible to being carried away by wind or water. This is crucial in maintaining the integrity of agricultural fields, preventing loss of topsoil, and ensuring sustainable land use. Stabilized soils are more r resistant to adverse weather conditions like drought or heavy rain. This adaptability can assist farmers in reducing the impact of climate change on their crops and agricultural output.

Infrastructure Development

Infrastructure projects, such as roads, highways, bridges, airports, ports, and railways, require stable and strong foundations to ensure their long-term durability and functionality. Soil stabilization techniques play a crucial role in preparing construction sites and addressing soil-related challenges that can arise during these projects. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), over 90% of all construction projects in the United States involve soil stabilization, and USGS (US Geological Survey) projected that soil stabilization techniques could lessen construction costs by up to 20%, depending on the type of project and other factors.

Infrastructure projects often involve the construction of heavy and complex structures. Proper soil stabilization ensures that the foundation can support the weight and load-bearing requirements of these structures, preventing settlement, uneven subsidence, and structural failure.

High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques

The implementation of soil stabilization techniques can involve significant upfront costs, including expenses related to equipment, materials, and skilled labor. For instance, according to the International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), for 10 m3 volume of soil to be stabilized, average cost of cement stabilization is Rs 10,912. These costs can deter some construction projects or land development initiatives from adopting soil stabilization methods, especially in cases where budget constraints are a concern.

Farmers might not fully understand the benefits of soil stabilization or the potential return on investment. High upfront costs can discourage them from exploring or adopting these practices, especially if they are unaware of the long-term advantages.

Segment Analysis

The global soil stabilization market is segmented based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region.

Efficient Result Achieved by Mechanical Method

The mechanical method involves physically altering the soil's structure and properties to achieve stabilization. In February 2023, Bobcat introduced a new light compaction product range. These Light compactors increase soil strength and improve stability and load-bearing capacity by removing voids and interlocking soil particles. Mechanical methods often provide relatively rapid results in terms of soil loosening and compaction reduction. Farmers and land managers can see immediate improvements in soil structure and tilth after using mechanical equipment.

Some mechanical methods, such as reduced tillage or no-till practices, are also associated with improved soil conservation and reduced erosion. These practices align with sustainable farming principles and may receive support from agricultural policies and programs.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Geographical Penetration

Asia-Pacific's Growing Soil Erosion

Many areas in Asia-Pacific are experiencing significant soil erosion problems which leads to crop loss in that region. For instance, the annual loss in output of main crops in India because of soil erosion has been estimated to be 7.2 million tonnes which is about 4 to 6.3 percent of the annual agricultural production of the country. Soil stabilization is crucial for preventing erosion and maintaining soil health enhancing crop productivity in that region.

In June 2022, InnoCSR, a South Korean material technology company and member of the Born2Global Centre, introduced Good Road System (GRS), its soil-stabilized road technology, in Nepal. The technology follows the success of the Good Bricks System, where InnoCSR's soil stabilizers are used to make non-fired bricks. This type of development in the Asia-Pacific region also leads to soil stabilization market growth in that region.

Source: DataM Intelligence Analysis (2023)

Competitive Landscape

The major global players include Caterpillar, AB Volvo, FAYAT GROUP, WIRTGEN GROUP, CARMEUSE, Global Road Technology International Holdings, SNF, Aggrebind, Inc., Iridan and Tensar

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID Impact

The pandemic led to disruptions in global supply chains, affecting the availability of materials and equipment needed for soil stabilization projects. This might have resulted in delays or increased costs for agricultural operations.

Lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures impacted labor availability and mobility. This could have affected the implementation of soil stabilization techniques that require manual labor or specialized expertise.

By Method

Mechanical Method
Chemical Method

By Additives

Polymer
- Synthetic Polymers
- Biopolymers
Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
- Portland Cement
- Lime
- Fly Ash
- Others
Other Additives
- Agricultural waste
- Sludge
- Chelates & Salts

By Distribution Channel

Company-Owned Shops
Specialty Stores
E-Commerce
Others

By Application

Industrial
- Roads
- Landfills/Contaminated Land
- Others
Agriculture
- Open-Field Application
- Greenhouse
Non-Agriculture
- Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
- Residential
- Others

By Region

North America
- U.S.
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

In April 2022, Researchers at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Mandi developed sustainable techniques for soil stabilization using a harmless bacteria called S. Pasteurii.
In August 2020, Corteva introduced the Instinct NEXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer. The Optinyte technology in Instinct NXTGEN nitrogen stabilizer promotes 28% greater soil nitrogen retention.
In June 2021, Lafarge Western Canada Introduced EcoPlanet Ultra Low Carbon Cement. EcoPlanet is suitable for mining and soil stabilization.

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global soil stabilization market segmentation based on method, additives, distribution channel, application and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of soil stabilization market-level with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as Excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global soil stabilization market report would provide approximately 69 tables, 67 figures and 247 Pages.

Target Audience 2023

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1.Methodology and Scope

1.1.Research Methodology
1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

3.1.Snippet by Method
3.2.Snippet by Additives
3.3.Snippet by Distribution Channel
3.4.Snippet by Application
3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

4.1.Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1.Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1.Increasing Awareness About the Benefits of Soil Stabilization
  - 4.1.1.2.Infrastructure Development
- 4.1.2.Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1.High Cost of Soil Stabilization Additives and Techniques
- 4.1.3.Opportunity
- 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
5.3.Pricing Analysis
5.4.Regulatory Analysis

6.COVID-19 Analysis

6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID
- 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID
- 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID
6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6.Conclusion

7.By Method

7.1.Introduction
- 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Method
7.2.Mechanical Method*
- 7.2.1.Introduction
- 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3.Chemical Method

8.By Additive

8.1.Introduction
- 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additive
- 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Additive
8.2.Polymer*
- 8.2.1.Introduction
- 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
- 8.2.3.Synthetic Polymers
- 8.2.4.Biopolymers
8.3.Mineral & Stabilizing Agents
- 8.3.1.Portland Cement
- 8.3.2.Lime
- 8.3.3.Fly Ash
- 8.3.4.Others
8.4.Other Additives
- 8.4.1.Agricultural waste
- 8.4.2.Sludge
- 8.4.3.Chelates & Salts

9.By Distribution Channel

9.1.Introduction
- 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Distribution Channel
9.2.Company-Owned Shops*
- 9.2.1.Introduction
- 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3.Specialty Stores
9.4.E-Commerce
9.5.Others

10.By Application

10.1.Introduction
- 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
10.2.Industrial*
- 10.2.1.Introduction
- 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
- 10.2.3.Roads
- 10.2.4.Landfills/Contaminated Land
- 10.2.5.Others
10.3.Agriculture
- 10.3.1.Open-Field Application
- 10.3.2.Greenhouse
- 10.3.3.Non-Agriculture
- 10.3.4.Golf Courses/Sports Grounds
- 10.3.5.Residential
- 10.3.6.Others

11.By Region

11.1.Introduction
- 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
11.2.North America
- 11.2.1.Introduction
- 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.2.7.1.U.S.
  - 11.2.7.2.Canada
  - 11.2.7.3.Mexico
11.3.Europe
- 11.3.1.Introduction
- 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.3.7.1.Germany
  - 11.3.7.2.UK
  - 11.3.7.3.France
  - 11.3.7.4.Italy
  - 11.3.7.5.Russia
  - 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
11.4.South America
- 11.4.1.Introduction
- 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.4.7.1.Brazil
  - 11.4.7.2.Argentina
  - 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
11.5.Asia-Pacific
- 11.5.1.Introduction
- 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.5.7.1.China
  - 11.5.7.2.India
  - 11.5.7.3.Japan
  - 11.5.7.4.Australia
  - 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.6.Middle East and Africa
- 11.6.1.Introduction
- 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Method
- 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Additives
- 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Distribution Channel
- 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application

12.Competitive Landscape

12.1.Competitive Scenario
12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

13.1.Caterpillar*
- 13.1.1.Company Overview
- 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
- 13.1.3.Financial Overview
- 13.1.4.Recent Developments
13.2.AB Volvo
13.3.FAYAT GROUP
13.4.WIRTGEN GROUP
13.5.CARMEUSE
13.6.Global Road Technology International Holdings (HK) Limited
13.7.SNF
13.8.Aggrebind, Inc.
13.9.Iridan
13.10.Tensar LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14.Appendix

14.1.About Us and Services
14.2.Contact Us

02-2729-4219

+886-2-2729-4219

License/价格

土壤稳定市场 - 2023-2030

Soil Stabilization Market - 2023-2030

目录

目录

第 1 章：方法与范围

第 2 章：定义与概述

第 3 章：执行摘要

第 4 章：动力学

第 5 章：产业分析

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

第 7 章：按方法

第 8 章：透过添加剂

第 9 章：按配销通路

第 10 章：按应用

第 11 章：按地区

第 12 章：竞争格局

第 13 章：公司简介

第 14 章：附录