封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1489479

全球空间碎片清除市场 - 2024-2031

Global Space Debris Removal Market - 2024-2031

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 180 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

2023年,全球太空碎片清除市场达1.012亿美元,预计2031年将达到16.356亿美元,2024-2031年预测期间复合年增长率为41.6%。

空间碎片维护市场主要是由轨道碰撞的危险所驱动的。为了维持太空活动的长期可行性和安全性,随着在轨卫星、火箭级和其他太空物体数量的增加,处理太空碎片的需求日益增长。对空间碎片清除技术的市场需求是由促进空间可持续性的国际框架和计划推动的,例如联合国和平利用外层空间委员会关于减少空间碎片的建议。利害关係人承认负责任的太空运作和减少碎片尝试的重要性。

主要参与者不断推出的产品有助于推动预测期内的市场成长。例如,2023年5月10日,ClearSpace和阿丽亚娜航太公司签署了一份合同,与阿丽亚娜航太公司一起启动首次主动碎片清除任务。首次主动碎片清除任务可以捕捉重量超过100公斤的废弃空间碎片物体并使其脱离轨道。 VESPA(织女星辅助有效载荷适配器)的顶部是本次任务清除的空间碎片,在 2013 年织女星发射器第二次飞行后留在渐进处置轨道上。

由于该地区不断增加的产品发布和创新,北美是全球碎片清除市场的主导地区。例如,2021 年 9 月 21 日,全球发射服务和太空航太领导者 Rocket Lab USA, Inc. 与 Astroscale Japan Inc. 签署了合约。开发机构(JAXA) 进行其商业性碎片清除示范计画(CRD2) 第一阶段,该计画是从轨道上清除大型碎片的首批技术演示之一。 Electron 火箭计画于 2023 年从火箭实验室 1 号发射场发射。

动力学

卫星发射数量不断增加

地球轨道上的太空碎片总量随着太空任务、火箭级和卫星发射的数量而增加。垃圾数量不断增加,这增加了对技术和碎片清除服务的需求,也增加了人们对迅速清除太空垃圾的紧迫性的认识。太空中发生碰撞的可能性随着卫星和其他太空物体数量的增加而增加。凯斯勒症候群是太空碎片、失落的太空船和运作中的卫星坠毁时发生的一系列碰撞。卫星营运商寻求碎片清除技术来减少碰撞危险并保护重要资产。

航太机构和监管机构优先考虑增强空间态势感知、碎片监测能力和避碰机动。太空碎片清除对于安全太空运作和轨道拥塞管理至关重要。根据Euroconsultant的资料估计,每年发射8艘太空船或超过2800颗质量为4吨的卫星。为了维持安全的太空运作和管理轨道拥堵,太空碎片清理至关重要。根据Euroconsultant提供的资讯预测,每年发射超过2800颗质量为4吨的卫星,或每天发射8颗太空船。

不断增加的政府倡议

各国政府拨出大量资金和补助金来支持空间碎片清除研究、开发和营运措施。政府资金透过为资料分析、任务规划、技术开发和发射操作提供财政资源来加速市场成长。机器人技术、推进系统、材料和太空碎片清除技术的进步是政府资助的研发(R&D)计画的主要关注领域。研究与开发(R&D)努力鼓励创造力,推动技术进步并扩大空间碎片清除解决方案的潜力,从而推动市场扩张。

各国政府透过公私伙伴关係与私部门公司、研究机构和学术组织合作,促进空间碎片减缓、清理和永续发展工作。 PPP 结合了两个行业的资金、资源和经验,鼓励创新、资讯共享和市场成长。为了减少太空垃圾、维护轨道安全并促进太空永续性,各国政府制定了立法框架、政策和法规。鼓励对碎片清除技术和服务的投资,创造市场确定性,并透过明确的法律和合规要求促进负责任的太空活动。例如,2024年3月25日,ISRO极地卫星运载火箭(PSLV)完成了零轨道碎片任务,并将其描述为「另一个里程碑」。在轨道上,PSLV-C58/XPoSat 任务基本上没有留下任何浪费。

成本高

对于进入市场的新竞争对手来说,规划、执行和管理空间碎片清除任务的高昂费用构成了障碍。如果资源有限,较小的企业或组织很难参与碎片清除专案和技术的竞争或投资。高价阻碍了对空间碎片清理工作的投资。由于所需的大量初始投资、持续的营运成本、技术复杂性以及市场需求和获利能力的不可预测性,投资者认为该市场是危险的。

太空碎片清除任务的持续营运费用,包括太空船维护、地面运作、任务控制、资料分析和人员费用,导致整体成本较高。这些费用可能会导致预算紧张,并影响碎片清除计画的财务可行性。与开发空间碎片收集、交会、推进、导航和处置尖端技术相关的研究、开发、测试和认证支出是巨大的。太空碎片清除系统的复杂性以及对强大、可靠和任务就绪技术的要求增加了整个经济负担。

目录

第 1 章:方法与范围

  • 研究方法论
  • 报告的研究目的和范围

第 2 章:定义与概述

第 3 章:执行摘要

  • 按碎片大小分割的片段
  • 轨道片段
  • 技术片段
  • 最终使用者的片段
  • 按地区分類的片段

第 4 章:动力学

  • 影响因素
    • 司机
      • 卫星发射数量不断增加
      • 不断增加的政府倡议
    • 限制
      • 成本高
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第 5 章:产业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 监管分析
  • 俄乌战争影响分析
  • DMI 意见

第 6 章:COVID-19 分析

  • COVID-19 分析
    • COVID-19 之前的情况
    • COVID-19 期间的情况
    • COVID-19 后的情景
  • COVID-19 期间的定价动态
  • 供需谱
  • 疫情期间政府与市场相关的倡议
  • 製造商策略倡议
  • 结论

第 7 章:按碎片大小

  • 毫米至10毫米
  • 毫米至100毫米
  • 大于100mm

第 8 章:按轨道

  • 近地轨道
  • 中地球轨道
  • 地球静止轨道

第 9 章:按技术

  • 直接的
  • 间接

第 10 章:最终用户

  • 商业的
  • 政府

第 11 章:按地区

  • 北美洲
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 义大利
    • 西班牙
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 澳洲
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第 12 章:竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 13 章:公司简介

  • Astroscale
    • 公司简介
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 主要进展
  • ClearSpace
  • Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd
  • Northrop Grumman
  • Kall Morris Incorporated
  • Obruta Space Solutions Corp.
  • Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • Share My Space SAS
  • Electro Optic Systems
  • OrbitGuardians

第 14 章:附录

简介目录
Product Code: AD8458

Overview

Global Space Debris Removal Market reached US$ 101.2 Million in 2023 and is expected to reach US$ 1,635.6 Million by 2031, growing with a CAGR of 41.6% during the forecast period 2024-2031.

The market for space debris maintenance is mostly driven by the dangers of orbital collisions. To maintain the long-term viability and safety of space activities, there is a growing requirement for handling space debris as the number of satellites, rocket stages and other space objects in orbit increases. The market demand for space debris removal technologies is driven by international frameworks and programs that promote space sustainability, such as United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space recommendations on space debris reduction. The significance of responsible space operations and attempts to mitigate debris is acknowledged by stakeholders.

Growing product launches by the major players help to boost market growth over the forecast period. For instance, on May 10, 2023, ClearSpace and Arianespace signed a contract to launch the first active debris removal mission with Arianespace. The first active debris removal mission can capture and deorbit a derelict space debris object of more than 100kg. The top portion of a VESPA (Vega Secondary Payload Adapter), which was left in a progressive disposal orbit after a Vega launcher's second flight in 2013, is the space debris item that this mission is removing.

North America is a dominating region in the global debris removal market due to the growing product launches and innovations in the region. For instance, on September 21, 2021, Rocket Lab USA, Inc. a global leader in launch services and space systems signed a contract with Astroscale Japan Inc. The Active Debris Removal by Astroscale-Japan (ADRAS-J) satellite has been chosen by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) for Phase I of its Commercial Removal of Debris Demonstration Project (CRD2), which is one of the first technological demonstrations of removing large-scale debris from orbit. The Electron rocket is scheduled to launch from Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1 in 2023.

Dynamics

Growing Number of Satellite Launches

The overall amount of space debris in Earth's orbit grows with the number of space missions, rocket stages and satellite launches. The population of garbage is growing, which increases the demand for technology and debris removal services as well as awareness of the urgency of removing space rubbish swiftly. The probability of collisions in space increases with the number of satellites and other space objects. The Kessler Syndrome is a sequence of collisions that occur when space debris, lost spacecraft and operating satellites crash. Satellite operators look for debris removal technologies to reduce the danger of collisions and safeguard important assets.

Space agencies and regulatory bodies prioritize enhancing space situational awareness, debris monitoring capabilities and collision avoidance maneuvers. Space debris removal is crucial for safe space operations and orbital congestion management. According to data from Euroconsultant estimate, 8 spacecraft or more than 2,800 satellites with a mass of 4 Tons, are launched annually. To maintain safe space operations and manage orbital congestion, space debris cleanup is essential. Based on the information provided by Euroconsultant projection, over 2,800 satellites with a mass of 4 Tons are launched per year or 8 spacecraft every day.

Growing Government Initiatives

Governments allocate significant funding and grants to support space debris removal research, development and operational initiatives. Government funding accelerates market growth by providing financial resources for data analysis, mission planning, technological development and launch operations. The advancement of robotics, propulsion systems, materials and space debris removal technologies are the main areas of concentration for government-funded research and development (R&D) programs. Research and development (R&D) endeavors encourage creativity, propel technical progress and amplify the potential of space debris removal solutions, hence propelling market expansion.

Governments collaborate with private sector companies, research institutions and academic organizations through PPPs to promote space debris mitigation, cleanup and sustainability efforts. PPPs combine funds, resources and experience from both industries to encourage innovation, information sharing and market growth. To reduce space trash, maintain orbital safety and promote space sustainability, governments set legislative frameworks, policies and regulations. Investment in debris removal technology and services is encouraged, market certainty is created and responsible space activities are promoted by well-defined laws and compliance requirements. For instance, on March 25, 2024, the ISRO Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV), accomplished zero orbital debris mission and described it as "another milestone". In orbit, the PSLV-C58/XPoSat mission has essentially left no waste behind.

High Costs

For new rivals entering the market, the high expenses of planning, executing and managing space debris removal missions provide a barrier. It is difficult for smaller businesses or organizations to compete or undertake investments in projects and technology for debris removal if they have limited resources. Investments in space debris cleaning efforts are discouraged by high prices. Due to the large initial investment needed, ongoing operating costs, technical complexity and unpredictability in market demand and profitability, investors see the market as hazardous.

The ongoing operational expenses for space debris removal missions, including spacecraft maintenance, ground operations, mission control, data analysis and personnel costs, contribute to the overall high costs. The expenses can strain budgets and impact the financial viability of debris removal initiatives. The research, development, testing and certification expenditures associated with developing cutting-edge technology for space debris collection, rendezvous, propulsion, navigation and disposal are substantial. The entire economic burden is increased by the complexity of space debris removal systems and the requirement for strong, dependable and mission-ready technology.

Segment Analysis

The global space debris removal market is segmented based on debris size, orbit, technique, end-user and region.

Commercial End-User is Dominating in the Space Debris Removal Market

Based on the end-user the space debris removal market is segmented into commercial and government.

The industrialization of space activities, such as satellite constellations, space tourism and communication networks, has resulted in an enormous increase in the quantity of commercial space resources. The considerable interest that commercial operators have in protecting their assets and ensuring the sustainability of their space operations is driving the need for services related to cleaning up space debris. Collisions with space debris present a concern to commercial satellite operators and can affect the longevity, operation and success of satellite missions. By actively addressing collision risks, reducing debris dangers and guaranteeing the safe operation of commercial satellite fleets, space debris removal services provide risk management solutions.

Companies are paying increasing attention to following space sustainability policies, rules and best practices concerning space debris reduction. Initiatives for eliminating space debris show a dedication to ethical space operations, environmental conservation and respect for international space debris mitigation standards. Commercial operators make large financial investments in Earth observation systems, communications networks, satellite infrastructure and other space assets. By lowering the risk of accidents, minimizing operational delays and guaranteeing the long-term profitability of commercial space endeavors, space debris removal services help safeguard these priceless assets.

Geographical Penetration

North America is Dominating the Space Debris Removal Market

The space industry ecosystem in North America and especially in United States, is highly developed and advanced. Major space organizations like NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) as well as top aerospace companies, academic institutions and technology suppliers with expertise in space exploration, satellite production and space debris mitigation are based in the region. Whether it comes to the development of robots, autonomous systems and space technology, North America is ideally placed. Effective missions and techniques for the cleanup of space debris are made possible by the region's expertise in the construction and deployment of advanced satellites and spacecraft.

Initiatives for the exploration of space, research and development including those to remove space debris are heavily financed and supported by US government. Organizations like NASA and the Department of Defense (DoD) allocate funds for debris monitoring, cleanup and space situational awareness, which propels regional investment and market expansion. Private sector initiatives aid government endeavors and position the sector as a leader in technology and services for cleaning up space debris.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Astroscale, ClearSpace, Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd, Northrop Grumman, Kall Morris Incorporated, Obruta Space Solutions Corp., Lockheed Martin Corporation, Share My Space SAS, Electro Optic Systems and OrbitGuardians.

COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Global supply chains were disrupted by the pandemic, which had an impact on the availability of components, supplies and machinery required for space debris cleaning technology. Space debris cleanup mission deployment schedules and project timeframes have been affected by delays in production, shipping and logistics. The pandemic's budget reallocations and economic worries caused delays and financing difficulties for several space-related initiatives and notably to remove space debris. Due to the prioritization of vital services and programs by governments, space agencies and commercial businesses, space debris clearance efforts have been delayed or decreased.

Collaboration, coordination and project execution in space debris cleanup were impacted by remote work arrangements and limitations on travel and in-person activities. Due to restricted access to the facilities, labs and testing environments needed for space technology development and validation, engineering, testing and operational operations have been challenging. Funding availability for space debris clearance projects was impacted by investor confidence and market concern brought on by the epidemic. There may have been an influence on venture capital investments, financing for startups and commercial collaborations in the space sector, which would have slowed down innovation and market expansion.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

Geopolitical tensions and regulatory uncertainties are caused by the war, particularly in the space sector. Market dynamics are impacted by modifications to export regulations, trade restrictions and international cooperation agreements affecting the flow of technology, equipment and services linked to the clearance of space debris. Global supply chains for systems, resources and components related to space technology might be disrupted by the war. Disruptions in the supply chain cause a delay in the development and implementation of technology for removing space debris, such as robotic arms, propulsion systems and satellite maintenance vehicles, which impacts project timetables and market timeframes.

Political disputes have an impact on international cooperation and collaborations in the space debris authorization industry. Collaborations in research, joint ventures and shared efforts between nations and space agencies encounter difficulties or be shelved, which might affect market innovation, information sharing and technological advancement. Changes in national space policy, budget allocations and priorities may result from the dispute. Investments in space debris prevention and cleaning projects are impacted if governments and space agencies divert funds to goals related to geopolitics, national security and defense.

By Debris Size

  • 1mm to 10mm
  • 10mm to 100mm
  • Greater than 100mm

By Orbit

  • Low Earth Orbit
  • Medium Earth Orbit
  • Geostationary Earth Orbit

By Technique

  • Direct
  • Indirect

By End-User

  • Commercial
  • Government

By Region

  • North America
    • U.S.
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Rest of South America
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Australia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa

Key Developments

  • On February 19, 2024, Astroscale Holdings, a Japanese startup launched a satellite to survey the state of a jettisoned rocket section in orbit in space. It is the first technology for space debris removal. It is currently orbiting 600 kilometers above the Earth's surface at high speed.
  • On February 09, 2024, Rocket Lab launched Astroscale Orbital Debris Removal Satellite Complex 1 in New Zealand. The mission of this program is orbital debris removal. ADRAS-J is flying around the stage, 11 meters long and four meters in diameter attached with inspection cameras.
  • On April 26, 2024, Astroscale launched the World's First Image of Space Debris Captured through Rendezvous and Proximity Operations. The image was taken by its commercial debris inspection demonstration satellite, Active Debris Removal by Astroscale-Japan (ADRAS-J), from several hundred meters behind the space debris, a rocket upper stage.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • To visualize the global space debris removal market segmentation based on debris size, orbit, technique, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
  • Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
  • Excel data sheet with numerous data points of space debris removal market-level with all segments.
  • PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
  • Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global space debris removal market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 51 figures and 180 Pages.

Target Audience 2024

  • Manufacturers/ Buyers
  • Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
  • Research Professionals
  • Emerging Companies

Table of Contents

1.Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1.Research Methodology
  • 1.2.Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2.Definition and Overview

3.Executive Summary

  • 3.1.Snippet by Debris Size
  • 3.2.Snippet by Orbit
  • 3.3.Snippet by Technique
  • 3.4.Snippet by End-User
  • 3.5.Snippet by Region

4.Dynamics

  • 4.1.Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1.Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1.Growing Number of Satellite Launches
      • 4.1.1.2.Growing Government Initiatives
    • 4.1.2.Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1.High Costs
    • 4.1.3.Opportunity
    • 4.1.4.Impact Analysis

5.Industry Analysis

  • 5.1.Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2.Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3.Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4.Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.5.Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
  • 5.6.DMI Opinion

6.COVID-19 Analysis

  • 6.1.Analysis of COVID-19
    • 6.1.1.Scenario Before COVID-19
    • 6.1.2.Scenario During COVID-19
    • 6.1.3.Scenario Post COVID-19
  • 6.2.Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
  • 6.3.Demand-Supply Spectrum
  • 6.4.Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
  • 6.5.Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
  • 6.6.Conclusion

7.By Debris Size

  • 7.1.Introduction
    • 7.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Debris Size
    • 7.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Debris Size
  • 7.2. 1mm to 10mm*
    • 7.2.1.Introduction
    • 7.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. 10mm to 100mm
  • 7.4.Greater than 100mm

8.By Orbit

  • 8.1.Introduction
    • 8.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Orbit
    • 8.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Orbit
  • 8.2.Low Earth Orbit*
    • 8.2.1.Introduction
    • 8.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3.Medium Earth Orbit
  • 8.4.Geostationary Earth Orbit

9.By Technique

  • 9.1.Introduction
    • 9.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technique
    • 9.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Technique
  • 9.2.Direct*
    • 9.2.1.Introduction
    • 9.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3.Indirect

10.By End-User

  • 10.1.Introduction
    • 10.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 10.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
  • 10.2.Commercial*
    • 10.2.1.Introduction
    • 10.2.2.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3.Government

11.By Region

  • 11.1.Introduction
    • 11.1.1.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2.Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2.North America
    • 11.2.1.Introduction
    • 11.2.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Debris Size
    • 11.2.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Orbit
    • 11.2.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technique
    • 11.2.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.2.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.7.1.U.S.
      • 11.2.7.2.Canada
      • 11.2.7.3.Mexico
  • 11.3.Europe
    • 11.3.1.Introduction
    • 11.3.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Debris Size
    • 11.3.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Orbit
    • 11.3.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technique
    • 11.3.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.3.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.7.1.Germany
      • 11.3.7.2.UK
      • 11.3.7.3.France
      • 11.3.7.4.Italy
      • 11.3.7.5.Spain
      • 11.3.7.6.Rest of Europe
  • 11.4.South America
    • 11.4.1.Introduction
    • 11.4.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Debris Size
    • 11.4.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Orbit
    • 11.4.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technique
    • 11.4.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.4.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.7.1.Brazil
      • 11.4.7.2.Argentina
      • 11.4.7.3.Rest of South America
  • 11.5.Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1.Introduction
    • 11.5.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Debris Size
    • 11.5.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Orbit
    • 11.5.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technique
    • 11.5.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
    • 11.5.7.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.7.1.China
      • 11.5.7.2.India
      • 11.5.7.3.Japan
      • 11.5.7.4.Australia
      • 11.5.7.5.Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6.Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1.Introduction
    • 11.6.2.Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Debris Size
    • 11.6.4.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Orbit
    • 11.6.5.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technique
    • 11.6.6.Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

12.Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1.Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2.Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3.Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13.Company Profiles

  • 13.1.Astroscale*
    • 13.1.1.Company Overview
    • 13.1.2.Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3.Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4.Key Developments
  • 13.2.ClearSpace
  • 13.3.Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd
  • 13.4.Northrop Grumman
  • 13.5.Kall Morris Incorporated
  • 13.6.Obruta Space Solutions Corp.
  • 13.7.Lockheed Martin Corporation
  • 13.8.Share My Space SAS
  • 13.9.Electro Optic Systems
  • 13.10.OrbitGuardians

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14.Appendix

  • 14.1.About Us and Services
  • 14.2.Contact Us