首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 通讯

Web服务

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1594860

全球远端浏览器隔离市场 - 2024-2031

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market - 2024-2031

出版日期: 2024年11月21日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 213 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

概述

2023年，全球远端浏览器隔离市场达到5.4424亿美元，预计2031年将达到49.2736亿美元，2024-2031年预测期间复合年增长率为31.71%。

远端浏览器隔离（通常称为 Web 隔离）是一种安全性策略，透过将使用者装置与直接 Internet 存取隔离来保护使用者的装置。透过在基于云端的远端容器中执行所有浏览操作来实现隔离。透过实施网路浏览沙箱，远端浏览器隔离可以保护资料、装置和网路免受流氓网站程式码造成的众多漏洞的影响。

远端浏览器隔离解决方案认识到在行动装置上安全浏览网页的必要性，从而创建了以行动为中心的功能。这些技术旨在确保智慧型手机和平板电脑上不间断且安全的网路浏览。以行动装置为中心的远端浏览器隔离解决方案考虑了萤幕尺寸、触觉互动和资源效率等元素，以确保无缝效能和使用者友善的介面。

此外，正在开发浏览器扩充功能和插件，以将远端浏览器隔离功能直接包含到广泛使用的行动浏览器中，从而消除独立程式的必要性。这些扩充功能为消费者提供了一种实用的方法，可以在不牺牲便利性的情况下在其行动装置上进行安全浏览。

动力学

日益严重的网路安全担忧

网路安全威胁是指任何可能对企业营运、职能、品牌、声誉或公众形象造成不利影响的事件或情况。攻击面的扩大和恶意实体的先进策略加剧了网路安全威胁的增加。利用虚拟浏览器技术的远端浏览器隔离提供了额外的安全层，以减少来自线上浏览器的威胁。

例如，2023 年 1 月，以色列软体公司 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 报告称，透过使用远端浏览器隔离侦测网路攻击，近年来全球网路攻击增加了 38%。此外，2022 年，美国的整体网路攻击成长了 57%，英国成长了 77%，新加坡成长了 26%。因此，不断升级的网路安全问题正在推动远端浏览器隔离市场的扩张。

安全浏览器扩充功能的兴起以提高生产力和保护

从传统浏览器隔离技术到安全浏览器扩充功能的转变是出于在当代商业环境中协调安全性与生产力的必要性。儘管隔离以前提供了强大的安全性，但它对 CPU 使用率的影响经常会阻碍效能，从而阻碍了以生产力为导向的企业的采用。在当代工作场所中，浏览器和 SaaS 服务已成为日常功能不可或缺的一部分，传统隔离方法的效能缺陷可能相当明显，进而影响安全决策。

此外，基于网路的威胁（例如网路钓鱼、恶意软体和勒索软体）的特征和流行程度已经超出了过时隔离方法的功效，从而导致了新的安全漏洞。安全浏览器扩充功能透过直接嵌入浏览器、透过机器学习提供即时可见性、风险评估和自动攻击回应来弥补这些缺陷。该发明提供了不间断的主动保护，且不影响生产力，使其成为浏览器安全解决方案的重要改进。

效能和延迟问题

远端浏览器隔离解决方案通常需要将线上浏览任务委託给远端伺服器，这可能会导致页面载入时间和整体延迟增加。对于依赖资源密集型即时程序（例如视讯会议工具或基于云端的软体）的客户来说，这种影响尤其明显，其中速度和响应能力对于不间断的功能至关重要。

此外，随着企业越来越多地采用远端工作模式和基于云端的应用程序，对高速、低延迟浏览体验的需求不断升级。与远端浏览器隔离相关的效能下降可能会阻止公司实施这些解决方案，因为他们优先考虑客户满意度和营运效率。因此，提高安全性和效能之间的平衡对远端浏览器隔离的广泛实施构成了相当大的障碍，特别是在速度和效率至关重要的情况下。

Remote browser isolation, often known as web isolation, is a security strategy that protects users' devices by isolating them from direct internet access. The isolation is accomplished by conducting all browsing actions within a remote, cloud-based container. By implementing sandboxing for internet browsing, remote browser isolation safeguards data, devices and networks against numerous vulnerabilities posed by rogue website code.

Remote browser isolation solutions are acknowledging the necessity for secure web browsing on mobile devices, resulting in the creation of mobile-centric functionalities. These technologies are designed to ensure uninterrupted and secure web browsing on smartphones and tablets. Mobile-centric Remote Browser Isolation solutions take into account elements like screen dimensions, tactile interactions and resource efficiency to guarantee seamless performance and user-friendly interfaces.

Furthermore, browser extensions and plugins are being developed to include remote browser isolation functionalities directly into widely-used mobile browsers, thereby obviating the necessity for standalone programs. The extensions provide a practical method for consumers to achieve secure browsing on their mobile devices without sacrificing convenience.

Dynamics

The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns

A cybersecurity threat refers to any incident or situation that could lead to detrimental effects on a business's operations, functions, brand, reputation or public image. The rise in cybersecurity threats is fueled by the broadening of attack surfaces and the advancing strategies of malevolent entities. Remote browser isolation, utilizing virtual browser technology, provides an additional security layer to reduce threats originating from online browsers.

For instance, in January 2023, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., an Israel-based software firm, reported a 38% rise in global cyberattacks in recent years by using Remote browser isolation in detection of cyberattacks. Also, in 2022, US experienced a 57% rise in overall cyberattacks, UK a 77% increase and Singapore a 26% increase. Consequently, the escalating cybersecurity concerns are propelling the expansion of the remote browser isolation market.

The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection

The transition from conventional browser isolation techniques to secure browser extensions is motivated by the necessity to reconcile security with productivity in the contemporary business landscape. Although isolation formerly provided strong security, its effect on CPU utilization frequently hindered performance, discouraging adoption by productivity-oriented enterprises. In contemporary workplaces, where browsers and SaaS services are integral to daily functions, the performance drawbacks of conventional isolation methods might be considerably pronounced, impacting security decisions.

Furthermore, the characteristics and prevalence of web-based threats-such as phishing, malware and ransomware-have advanced beyond the efficacy of outdated isolation methods, resulting in new security vulnerabilities. Secure browser extensions mitigate these deficiencies by embedding directly within browsers, offering real-time visibility, risk assessment and automated attack responses via machine learning. This invention provides uninterrupted, proactive protection without hindering productivity, rendering it a vital improvement in browser security solutions.

Performance And Latency Issues

Remote Browser Isolation solutions often entail delegating online browsing tasks to a remote server, potentially resulting in increased page loading times and overall latency. The effect is especially evident for customers dependent on resource-intensive, real-time programs, such as video conferencing tools or cloud-based software, where speed and responsiveness are essential for uninterrupted functionality.

Furthermore, as enterprises increasingly embrace remote work models and cloud-based apps, the demand for high-speed, low-latency browsing experiences escalates. The performance decline linked to Remote Browser Isolation may dissuade firms from implementing these solutions, as they prioritize customer delight and operational efficiency. Thus, the balance between improved security and performance presents a considerable obstacle to the widespread implementation of remote browser isolation, especially in contexts where rapidity and efficiency are critical.

Segment Analysis

The global remote browser isolation market is segmented based on type organization size, end-user and region.

DOM Reconstruction-Based Type Offers Several Advantages For Enhancing Security And Performance

DOM reconstruction-based remote browser isolation has numerous benefits for improving security and performance in the information technology and telecommunications industries. DOM reconstruction mitigates the danger of hazardous material and web-based assaults by eliminating potentially malicious code and known exploits, so offering an additional layer of protection that conventional security measures may fail to identify.

The technology enhances the surfing experience by reducing latency in specific pixel-rendering systems and sending web content directly to the user's local browser, hence improving performance and user satisfaction. Moreover, DOM reconstruction is a more economical approach than certain pixel-pushing techniques, as it obviates the necessity for substantial server-side rendering and diminishes the transfer of online content. It reduces operational expenses related to remote browser isolation while ensuring strong defense against online threats.

Geographical Penetration

North America's Increasing Need For Advanced Cybersecurity Solutions.

The robust regulatory framework in North America, encompassing data protection statutes such as the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) and several industry-specific rules, has expedited the implementation of remote browser isolation to adhere to data security and privacy mandates. US has been a leader in implementing remote browser isolation technology to safeguard against the increasing menace of cyberattacks, including ransomware, malware and phishing.

The substantial number of online transactions and sensitive data transmitted in sectors such as finance, healthcare and telecommunications requires the implementation of stringent web security protocols. The remote browser isolation effectively mitigates web-based risks by isolating them, thereby safeguarding endpoint devices and business networks from potential harm.

Prominent cybersecurity firms and IT service providers in the region are progressively incorporating remote browser isolation into their services, enabling businesses to protect their online browsing activity without sacrificing user experience or system efficiency. The interplay of regulatory compliance, heightened demand for data protection and technical innovation establishes North America as a major market for remote browser isolation solutions.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Broadcom, Cisco, Cloudflare, ConnX, Ericom, Forcepoint, McAfee, Proofpoint, Versa Networks and Zscaler.

Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis

The war between Russia and Ukraine has profoundly affected remote browser isolation (RBI) solutions, especially in Russia, where heightened digital sovereignty initiatives and international sanctions have compromised Internet infrastructure and online security. The escalation of the conflict has prompted Russia to seek isolation of its Internet ecosystem, resulting in the exit of several international technology firms, including security and cloud service providers.

This has led to a reduced availability of dependable security technologies in Russia, especially sophisticated RBI solutions that depend on international providers for secure web browsing protection. The withdrawal of these foreign services has compelled Russian entities to rely on less dependable domestic alternatives that may not provide equivalent security against cyber threats, especially those aimed at browsers.

The sanctions and domestic censorship in Russia have exacerbated the nation's cybersecurity environment. The increasing fragmentation of the global Internet environment, coupled with the diminished presence of international network operators and service providers, has impeded the efficacy of RBI solutions. These technologies depend significantly on uninterrupted connectivity and worldwide infrastructure to detect threats in real-time.

Type

DOM Reconstruction-Based
Pixel Pushing-Based
Network Vector Rendering
Others

Organization Size

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
Large Enterprises

End-User

Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
IT and Telecom
Healthcare
Government and Defense
Retail and E-Commerce
Education
Others

By Region

North America
- US
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global remote browser isolation market segmentation based on type organization size, end-user and region, as well as understand key commercial assets and players.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points of the remote browser isolation market level with all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global remote browser isolation market report would provide approximately 62 tables, 56 figures and 213 pages

Target Audience 2024

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Type
3.2. Snippet by Organization Size
3.3. Snippet by End-User
3.4. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. The Rising Cybersecurity Concerns
  - 4.1.1.2. The Rise Of Secure Browser Extensions For Enhanced Productivity And Protection
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. Performance And Latency Issues
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. Russia-Ukraine War Impact Analysis
5.6. DMI Opinion

6. COVID-19 Analysis

6.1. Analysis of COVID-19
- 6.1.1. Scenario Before COVID-19
- 6.1.2. Scenario During COVID-19
- 6.1.3. Scenario Post COVID-19
6.2. Pricing Dynamics Amid COVID-19
6.3. Demand-Supply Spectrum
6.4. Government Initiatives Related to the Market During Pandemic
6.5. Manufacturers Strategic Initiatives
6.6. Conclusion

7. By Type

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
7.2. DOM Reconstruction-Based*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Pixel Pushing-Based
7.4. Network Vector Rendering
7.5. Others

8. By Organization Size

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Organization Size
8.2. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Large Enterprises

9. By End-User

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
9.2. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)*
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3. IT and Telecom
9.4. Healthcare
9.5. Government and Defense
9.6. Retail and E-Commerce
9.7. Education
9.8. Others

10. By Region

10.1. Introduction
- 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
10.2. North America
- 10.2.1. Introduction
- 10.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 10.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 10.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.2.6.1. US
  - 10.2.6.2. Canada
  - 10.2.6.3. Mexico
10.3. Europe
- 10.3.1. Introduction
- 10.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 10.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 10.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.3.6.1. Germany
  - 10.3.6.2. UK
  - 10.3.6.3. France
  - 10.3.6.4. Italy
  - 10.3.6.5. Spain
  - 10.3.6.6. Rest of Europe
10.4. South America
- 10.4.1. Introduction
- 10.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 10.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 10.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.4.6.1. Brazil
  - 10.4.6.2. Argentina
  - 10.4.6.3. Rest of South America
10.5. Asia-Pacific
- 10.5.1. Introduction
- 10.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 10.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 10.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 10.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 10.5.6.1. China
  - 10.5.6.2. India
  - 10.5.6.3. Japan
  - 10.5.6.4. Australia
  - 10.5.6.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
10.6. Middle East and Africa
- 10.6.1. Introduction
- 10.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 10.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 10.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Organization Size
- 10.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

11. Competitive Landscape

11.1. Competitive Scenario
11.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
11.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

12. Company Profiles

12.1. Broadcom*
- 12.1.1. Company Overview
- 12.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 12.1.3. Financial Overview
- 12.1.4. Key Developments
12.2. Cisco
12.3. Cloudflare
12.4. ConnX
12.5. Ericom
12.6. Forcepoint
12.7. McAfee
12.8. Proofpoint
12.9. Versa Networks
12.10. Zscaler

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

13. Appendix

13.1. About Us and Services
13.2. Contact Us

02-2729-4219

+886-2-2729-4219

License/价格

全球远端浏览器隔离市场 - 2024-2031

Global Remote Browser Isolation Market - 2024-2031

目录

第 1 章：方法与范围

第 2 章：定义与概述

第 3 章：执行摘要

第 4 章：动力学

第 5 章：产业分析

第 6 章：COVID-19 分析

第 7 章：按类型

第 8 章：按组织规模

第 9 章：最终用户

第 10 章：按地区

第 11 章：竞争格局

第 12 章：公司简介

第 13 章：附录