封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1634202

全球氧化压力检测市场 - 2025 - 2033

Global Oxidative Stress Assay Market - 2025 - 2033

出版日期: | 出版商: DataM Intelligence | 英文 157 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

2024年,全球氧化压力检测市场规模达11.8亿美元,预计2032年将达到19亿美元,2025-2032年预测期间复合年增长率为9.7%。

氧化压力测定通常称为止痛药,是一类旨在缓解疼痛的药物。它们的作用是阻断体内的疼痛讯号或改变大脑解释这些讯号的方式。这些药物有多种形式,从非处方药到处方药。这些药物可以口服、肠胃外和局部服用。

市场动态:

驱动程式和限制

提高对疾病发病机制中氧化压力的认识

对疾病发病机制中氧化压力的认识不断提高是氧化压力检测市场成长的主要驱动力。随着科学研究不断揭示氧化压力在各种慢性疾病(包括癌症、心血管疾病、糖尿病和神经退化性疾病)的发生和发展中所起的关键作用,人们越来越认识到它在整体健康管理中的重要性。这种认知的加深导致对诊断工具的需求激增,例如可以准确测量和监测患者氧化损伤的氧化压力测定。

透过识别氧化压力的早期迹象,这些检测为疾病机制提供了宝贵的见解,帮助医疗保健提供者在预防、治疗和疾病管理方面做出更明智的决策。因此,人们对氧化压力在疾病发病机制中的作用的认识不断提高,推动了这些检测方法在研究和临床环境中的更多采用,从而促进了市场的扩张。

替代方法带来的竞争加剧

由于替代方法的出现为研究人员和临床医生提供了更具吸引力的选择,全球氧化压力检测市场预计将面临挑战。随着诊断技术的进步,生物标记检测和成像技术等替代方法变得越来越流行。这些方法可以间接或透过不同的生物途径评估氧化压力,与传统的氧化压力测定相比,通常可以缩短週转时间并简化工作流程。这种对替代测试方法的偏好转变可能会转移人们对传统氧化压力测定的注意力和资源,从而使氧化压力测定市场难以保持其成长势头。

目录

第 1 章:方法与范围

第 2 章:定义与概述

第 3 章:执行摘要

第 4 章:动力学

  • 影响因素
    • 司机
      • 提高对疾病发病机制中氧化压力的认识
    • 限制
      • 替代方法带来的竞争加剧
    • 机会
    • 影响分析

第 5 章:产业分析

  • 波特五力分析
  • 供应链分析
  • 定价分析
  • 专利分析
  • 监管分析
  • SWOT分析
  • 未满足的需求

第 6 章:副产品

  • 耗材
  • 仪器仪表
  • 套件
  • 服务

第 7 章:按测试类型

  • 间接测定
  • 抗氧化能力测定
  • 基于酵素的测定
  • 基于活性氧 (ROS) 的检测

第 8 章:按技术

  • 酵素连结免疫吸附测定法 (ELISA)
  • 色谱法
  • 流式细胞仪
  • 显微镜检查
  • 高内涵筛选
  • 无标记检测技术

第 9 章:依疾病类型

  • 心血管疾病
  • 糖尿病
  • 慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)
  • 癌症
  • 气喘

第 10 章:按最终用户

  • 製药公司
  • 生技公司
  • 临床实验室
  • 学术及研究机构
  • 合约研究组织
  • 其他的

第 11 章:按地区

  • 北美洲
    • 我们
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 义大利
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 南美洲
    • 巴西
    • 阿根廷
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 亚太
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 日本
    • 韩国
    • 亚太其他地区
  • 中东和非洲

第 12 章:竞争格局

  • 竞争场景
  • 市场定位/份额分析
  • 併购分析

第 13 章:公司简介

  • Abcam, plc.
    • 公司概况
    • 产品组合和描述
    • 财务概览
    • 主要进展
  • Enzo Biochem, Inc.
  • AMS Biotechnology Ltd.
  • Cell Biolabs, Inc.
  • Promega Corporation
  • Cayman Chemical
  • Eagle Biosciences, Inc.
  • Arbor Assays
  • Kamiya Biomedical Company
  • Genox Corporation

第 14 章:附录

第 15 章:联络我们

简介目录
Product Code: BT4826

The global oxidative stress assay market reached US$ 1.18 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 1.9 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 9.7% during the forecast period 2025-2032.

Oxidative Stress Assays, commonly known as painkillers, are a class of drugs designed to relieve pain. They work by blocking pain signals in the body or by altering the way the brain interprets those signals. These medications come in various forms, ranging from over-the-counter to prescription medications. These medications can be taken orally, parenterally, and topically.

Market Dynamics: Drivers & Restraints

Increasing awareness of oxidative stress in disease pathogenesis

Increasing awareness of oxidative stress in disease pathogenesis is a major driver for the growth of the oxidative stress assay market. As scientific research continues to uncover the pivotal role oxidative stress plays in the development and progression of various chronic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders, there is a growing recognition of its significance in overall health management. This increased understanding has led to a surge in demand for diagnostic tools, such as oxidative stress assays, that can accurately measure and monitor oxidative damage in patients.

By identifying early signs of oxidative stress, these assays provide valuable insights into disease mechanisms, helping healthcare providers make more informed decisions regarding prevention, treatment, and disease management. As a result, the increasing awareness of oxidative stress's role in disease pathogenesis is fueling greater adoption of these assays in both research and clinical settings, contributing to the market's expansion.

Rising competition from alternative methods

The global oxidative stress assays market is expected to face challenges due to the emergence of alternative methods that offer researchers and clinicians more appealing options. As diagnostic technologies advance, alternatives such as biomarker assays and imaging techniques are becoming increasingly popular. These methods can evaluate oxidative stress indirectly or through different biological pathways, often resulting in faster turnaround times and simpler workflows compared to traditional oxidative stress assays. This shift in preference towards alternative testing methods can divert attention and resources away from conventional oxidative stress assays, making it difficult for the oxidative stress assays market to maintain its growth momentum.

Segment Analysis

The global oxidative stress assay market is segmented based on product, test type, technology, disease type, end-user, and region.

Type:

Indirect assay segment is expected to dominate the global oxidative stress assay market share

The indirect assay segment is anticipated to lead the oxidative stress market, driven by several compelling advantages that make them highly appealing for both clinical and research applications. Indirect assays assess oxidative stress by detecting biomarkers, such as lipid peroxides, protein carbonyls, and DNA adducts, which are byproducts of oxidative damage. These assays are typically simpler, more cost-effective, and easier to conduct than direct assays that measure reactive oxygen species (ROS) directly. Consequently, indirect assays are frequently utilized in routine testing and large-scale studies, where affordability and ease of use are essential.

Additionally, indirect assays are particularly valuable for monitoring chronic conditions, as they can provide insights into long-term oxidative damage. This capability is critical for assessing the progression of diseases associated with oxidative stress. The growing preference for biomarker-based diagnostics, combined with the increasing adoption of these assays, is expected to propel their market share.

Furthermore, innovations in reagent development and the automation of testing processes are improving the sensitivity, throughput, and scalability of indirect assays, further solidifying their dominant position in the market. With their affordability, ease of use, and reliable results, indirect assays are well-positioned to drive the continued growth of the oxidative stress testing market.

Geographical Analysis

North America is expected to hold a significant position in the global oxidative stress assay market share

North America is expected to maintain a dominant position in the oxidative stress assay market due to several key factors. The region has a high level of investment in medical research, which fosters the development and adoption of advanced diagnostic tools, including oxidative stress assays. The presence of major pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the U.S. and Canada also contributes to the rapid development and commercialization of innovative assays for oxidative stress measurement.

Additionally, the rising prevalence of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders, in North America is driving demand for reliable diagnostic tools that can monitor oxidative stress, a key factor in the progression of these diseases. As the focus on personalized medicine and preventative healthcare grows, the demand for biomarkers and assays to assess oxidative damage is expected to increase, further fueling market growth.

Moreover, North America benefits from strong regulatory frameworks and well-established research and clinical standards, making it easier to introduce and adopt new assays. The region's advanced technological capabilities also support the continuous improvement of assay sensitivity and accuracy, providing a competitive edge. With increasing awareness of oxidative stress's role in disease pathogenesis and ongoing advancements in diagnostic technology, North America is poised to remain a leading market for oxidative stress assays in the coming years.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the oxidative stress assay market include Bayer AG, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC, Lupin, Cipla, Sanofi, AdvaCare Pharma, Wellona Pharma, and Montage Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. among others.

Why Purchase the Report?

  • Pipeline & Innovations: Reviews ongoing clinical trials, and product pipelines, and forecasts upcoming advancements in medical devices and pharmaceuticals.
  • Product Performance & Market Positioning: Analyzes product performance, market positioning, and growth potential to optimize strategies.
  • Real-World Evidence: Integrates patient feedback and data into product development for improved outcomes.
  • Physician Preferences & Health System Impact: Examines healthcare provider behaviors and the impact of health system mergers on adoption strategies.
  • Market Updates & Industry Changes: Covers recent regulatory changes, new policies, and emerging technologies.
  • Competitive Strategies: Analyzes competitor strategies, market share, and emerging players.
  • Pricing & Market Access: Reviews pricing models, reimbursement trends, and market access strategies.
  • Market Entry & Expansion: Identifies optimal strategies for entering new markets and partnerships.
  • Regional Growth & Investment: Highlights high-growth regions and investment opportunities.
  • Supply Chain Optimization: Assesses supply chain risks and distribution strategies for efficient product delivery.
  • Sustainability & Regulatory Impact: Focuses on eco-friendly practices and evolving regulations in healthcare.
  • Post-market Surveillance: Uses post-market data to enhance product safety and access.
  • Pharmacoeconomics & Value-Based Pricing: Analyzes the shift to value-based pricing and data-driven decision-making in R&D.

The Global Oxidative Stress Assays market report delivers a detailed analysis with 60+ key tables, more than 50 visually impactful figures, and 176 pages of expert insights, providing a complete view of the market landscape.

Target Audience 2023

  • Manufacturers: Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, Biotech Companies, Contract Manufacturers, Distributors, Hospitals.
  • Regulatory & Policy: Compliance Officers, Government, Health Economists, Market Access Specialists.
  • Technology & Innovation: AI/Robotics Providers, R&D Professionals, Clinical Trial Managers, Pharmacovigilance Experts.
  • Investors: Healthcare Investors, Venture Fund Investors, Pharma Marketing & Sales.
  • Consulting & Advisory: Healthcare Consultants, Industry Associations, Analysts.
  • Supply Chain: Distribution and Supply Chain Managers.
  • Consumers & Advocacy: Patients, Advocacy Groups, Insurance Companies.
  • Academic & Research: Academic Institutions.

Table of Contents

1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Research Methodology
  • 1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Snippet by Product
  • 3.2. Snippet by Test Type
  • 3.3. Snippet by Technology
  • 3.4. Snippet by Disease Type
  • 3.5. Snippet by End-user
  • 3.6. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

  • 4.1. Impacting Factors
    • 4.1.1. Drivers
      • 4.1.1.1. Increasing awareness of oxidative stress in disease pathogenesis
    • 4.1.2. Restraints
      • 4.1.2.1. Rising competition from alternative methods
    • 4.1.3. Opportunity
    • 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

  • 5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
  • 5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
  • 5.3. Pricing Analysis
  • 5.4. Patent Analysis
  • 5.5. Regulatory Analysis
  • 5.6. SWOT Analysis
  • 5.7. Unmet Needs

6. By Product

  • 6.1. Introduction
    • 6.1.1. Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product
    • 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Product
  • 6.2. Consumables*
    • 6.2.1. Introduction
    • 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 6.3. Instruments
  • 6.4. Kits
  • 6.5. Services

7. By Test Type

  • 7.1. Introduction
    • 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
    • 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Test Type
  • 7.2. Indirect Assays*
    • 7.2.1. Introduction
    • 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 7.3. Antioxidant Capacity Assays
  • 7.4. Enzyme-based Assays
  • 7.5. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-based Assays

8. By Technology

  • 8.1. Introduction
    • 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
  • 8.2. Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)*
    • 8.2.1. Introduction
    • 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 8.3. Chromatography
  • 8.4. Flow Cytometry
  • 8.5. Microscopy
  • 8.6. High-Content Screening
  • 8.7. Label-free Detection Technology

9. By Disease Type

  • 9.1. Introduction
    • 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Disease Type
    • 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Disease Type
  • 9.2. Cardiovascular Disease*
    • 9.2.1. Introduction
    • 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 9.3. Diabetes
  • 9.4. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • 9.5. Cancer
  • 9.6. Asthma

10. By End-user

  • 10.1. Introduction
    • 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
    • 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-user
  • 10.2. Pharmaceutical Companies*
    • 10.2.1. Introduction
    • 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  • 10.3. Biotechnology Companies
  • 10.4. Clinical Laboratories
  • 10.5. Academic & Research Institutes
  • 10.6. Contract Research Organizations
  • 10.7. Others

11. By Region

  • 11.1. Introduction
    • 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
    • 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
  • 11.2. North America
    • 11.2.1. Introduction
    • 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product
    • 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
    • 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Disease Type
    • 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
    • 11.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.2.8.1. U.S.
      • 11.2.8.2. Canada
      • 11.2.8.3. Mexico
  • 11.3. Europe
    • 11.3.1. Introduction
    • 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product
    • 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
    • 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Disease Type
    • 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
    • 11.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.3.8.1. Germany
      • 11.3.8.2. U.K.
      • 11.3.8.3. France
      • 11.3.8.4. Spain
      • 11.3.8.5. Italy
      • 11.3.8.6. Rest of Europe
  • 11.4. South America
    • 11.4.1. Introduction
    • 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product
    • 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
    • 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Disease Type
    • 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
    • 11.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.4.8.1. Brazil
      • 11.4.8.2. Argentina
      • 11.4.8.3. Rest of South America
  • 11.5. Asia-Pacific
    • 11.5.1. Introduction
    • 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product
    • 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
    • 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Disease Type
    • 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user
    • 11.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
      • 11.5.8.1. China
      • 11.5.8.2. India
      • 11.5.8.3. Japan
      • 11.5.8.4. South Korea
      • 11.5.8.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • 11.6. Middle East and Africa
    • 11.6.1. Introduction
    • 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
    • 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Product
    • 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Test Type
    • 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
    • 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Disease Type
    • 11.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-user

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Competitive Scenario
  • 12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
  • 12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

  • 13.1. Abcam, plc.*
    • 13.1.1. Company Overview
    • 13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
    • 13.1.3. Financial Overview
    • 13.1.4. Key Developments
  • 13.2. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
  • 13.3. AMS Biotechnology Ltd.
  • 13.4. Cell Biolabs, Inc.
  • 13.5. Promega Corporation
  • 13.6. Cayman Chemical
  • 13.7. Eagle Biosciences, Inc.
  • 13.8. Arbor Assays
  • 13.9. Kamiya Biomedical Company
  • 13.10. Genox Corporation

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

  • 14.1. About Us and Services

15. Contact Us