首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 医疗设备

医学影像诊断癌症核子医学

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1634216

全球粒子治疗市场 - 2025 - 2033

Global Particle Therapy Market - 2025 - 2033

出版日期: 2025年01月13日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 176 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

2024年，全球粒子治疗市场规模达13.3亿美元，预计2033年将达到25.8亿美元，2025-2033年预测期间复合年增长率为7.9%。

粒子疗法是一种先进的放射治疗形式，利用质子、中子和碳离子等带电粒子攻击癌细胞。与使用 X 射线的典型光子疗法不同，粒子疗法利用带电粒子的独特物理特征来更精确地传递辐射。这种精确度使得最大量的辐射能够定位在肿瘤部位，同时最大限度地减少对邻近健康组织的暴露，降低与传统放射治疗相关的副作用和长期后果的风险。

对粒子治疗的需求不断增长是预测期内推动市场的驱动因素。癌症病例数量的增加增加了对粒子疗法的需求，因为它用于癌症的治疗和管理。例如，根据美国国立卫生研究院的数据，到 2023 年，美国预计将出现 1,958,310 例新癌症病例。经过二十年的下降，2014年至2019年，摄护腺癌发生率每年增加3%，新增病例增加9.9万例。

市场动态：

驱动程式和限制

对粒子治疗的需求不断增加

对粒子治疗的需求不断增长预计将成为全球粒子治疗市场成长的重要因素。全球粒子治疗市场预计将大幅扩张，这主要是由于癌症盛行率不断上升、技术进步、最近的上市和批准、战略合作伙伴关係以及人们意识的提高。粒子疗法（包括质子疗法和重离子疗法）与典型的基于光子的放射疗法相比具有多种优势，包括对健康组织的伤害较小以及长期负面影响较少。这种针对恶性肿瘤的精确性改善了患者的整体生活质量，导致医疗保健从业者和患者越来越倾向于粒子治疗。

全球癌症发生率的上升对粒子治疗日益增长的需求产生了重大影响。癌症仍然是全世界疾病的主要原因之一。例如，根据世界癌症研究基金会的数据，2022 年包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌 (NMSC) 在内的癌症病例数为 19,976,499 例。当 NMSC 被消除后，到 2022 年，全球癌症病例数将减少至 18,741,966 例。此外，根据 IARC 的数据，2022 年将新增约 2,000 万名癌症病例（包括非黑色素瘤皮肤癌 [NMSC]）。据估计，五分之一的男性和女性会在一生中的某个阶段罹患癌症。肺癌是 2022 年最常被诊断出的癌症，约占 250 万新发病例，即全球每八种恶性肿瘤中就有一种（占所有癌症的 12.4%）。因此，对有效治疗替代方案的需求从未如此强烈。这种不断上升的发病率凸显了对改进治疗技术的迫切需要，例如粒子疗法，其中包括质子和重离子疗法，以其精确靶向肿瘤同时对邻近健康组织造成最小损害而闻名。

技术进步显着提高了颗粒处理的可及性和有效性。最近的创新包括紧凑且便宜的质子治疗设备的出现，这使得在不同的地方安装更多的治疗中心成为可能。这些创新不仅降低了总治疗成本，也简化了经典粒子治疗系统的操作复杂性。例如，2024 年 10 月，杰斐逊实验室宣布与汉普顿大学质子癌症研究所 (HUPCI) 和 Leo Cancer Care 合作，研究质子疗法作为更安全的癌症治疗选择的潜力。此次合作旨在利用新技术来提高质子疗法的精确度和有效性，质子疗法使用高能量质子束来靶向癌症，同时对周围健康组织造成最小的损害。这项措施尤其重要，因为它的目的是取代依赖钴 60 等放射性同位素的标准治疗方法，这些同位素会带来固有的放射性危险。

初始成本高

初始成本高等因素预计将阻碍全球粒子治疗市场。建立粒子治疗中心可能耗资超过 1 亿美元，其中包括迴旋加速器或同步加速器等昂贵的设备、特定的屏蔽基础设施以及确保治疗期间患者安全所需的技术。例如，根据国家卫生研究院的数据，粒子治疗费用从 10,030 欧元（c 离子：肺癌）到 39,610 欧元（质子：头颈恶性肿瘤）不等。由于这些重大的资本承诺，许多医疗保健提供者面临进入壁垒，特别是在资金和医疗保健预算不足的不发达国家。因此，粒子疗法的高昂财务成本限制了其广泛接受和可从这种创新治疗技术中受益的个人的可及性。

有关此报告的更多详细资讯 - 索取样品

Particle therapy is an advanced form of radiation treatment that targets cancerous cells with charged particles such as protons, neutrons, and carbon ions. Unlike typical photon-based therapies that use X-rays, particle therapy uses the distinct physical features of charged particles to deliver radiation more precisely. This precision enables the greatest amount of radiation to be localized at the tumor site while minimizing exposure to adjacent healthy tissues, lowering the risk of side effects and long-term consequences associated with traditional radiation therapies.

The increasing demand for particle therapy is the driving factor that drives the market over the forecast period. The increasing number of cancer cases increases the demand for particle therapy since it is used in the treatment and management of cancer. For instance, according to the National Institute of Health, In 2023, the United States is projected to see 1,958,310 new cancer cases. Prostate cancer incidence reached 3% every year from 2014 to 2019, after two decades of reduction, resulting in an additional 99,000 new cases.

Market Dynamics: Drivers & Restraints

Increasing demand for particle therapy

The increasing demand for particle therapy is expected to be a significant factor in the growth of the global particle therapy market. The global particle therapy market is poised for significant expansion, owing mostly to the rising prevalence of cancer, technological advancements, recent launches and approvals, strategic partnerships, and increasing awareness among people. Particle therapy, which includes proton and heavy ion therapies, has several advantages over typical photon-based radiation treatments, including less harm to healthy tissues and fewer long-term negative effects. This precision in targeting malignancies improves patients' overall quality of life, resulting in an increasing preference for particle therapy among both healthcare practitioners and patients.

The rising global incidence of cancer has a substantial impact on the growing need for particle therapy. Cancer remains one of the top causes of sickness worldwide. For instance, According to the World Cancer Research Fund, the number of cancer cases in 2022, including non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), was 19,976,499. When NMSCs were eliminated, the global cancer case count was reduced to 18,741,966 in 2022. There were 9,566,825 males and 9,175,141 females. Furthermore, according to the IARC, there will be about 20 million new cancer cases in 2022 (including nonmelanoma skin cancers [NMSCs]). According to estimates, one in every five men and women will get cancer at some point in their lives. Lung cancer was the most often diagnosed cancer in 2022, accounting for about 2.5 million new cases, or one in every eight malignancies globally (12.4% of all cancers). Thus the need for effective treatment alternatives has never been stronger. This rising incidence highlights the critical need for improved therapeutic techniques such as particle therapy, which comprises proton and heavy ion therapies known for their precision in targeting tumors while causing minimal damage to adjacent healthy tissues.

Technological advancements have significantly improved the accessibility and efficacy of particle treatment. Recent innovations include the advent of compact and less expensive proton therapy devices, which made it possible for the installation of more treatment centers in diverse places. These innovations not only lower total treatment costs but also simplify the operational complexity involved with classic particle therapy systems. For instance, in October 2024, Jefferson Lab announced that it is collaborating with the Hampton University Proton Cancer Institute (HUPCI) and Leo Cancer Care to study the potential of proton therapy as a safer cancer treatment option. This collaboration intends to use new technology to improve the precision and effectiveness of proton therapy, which uses high-energy proton beams to target cancers while causing minimal damage to surrounding healthy tissues. This initiative is particularly significant since it aims to replace standard treatments that rely on radioactive isotopes like cobalt-60, which pose inherent radiological dangers.

High initial costs

Factors such as high initial costs are expected to hamper the global particle therapy market. Setting up a particle therapy center can cost more than USD 100 million, which includes expensive equipment such as cyclotrons or synchrotrons, specific shielding infrastructure, and the technologies required to ensure patient safety during treatment. For instance, according to the National Institute of Health, Particle treatment expenses vary from Euro 10,030 (c-ion: lung cancer) to Euro 39,610 (proton: head & neck malignancies). Many healthcare providers face a barrier to entry as a result of these significant capital commitments, particularly in underdeveloped countries with inadequate funding and healthcare budgets. As a result, the high financial cost of particle therapy limits its widespread acceptance and accessibility to individuals who could benefit from this innovative therapeutic technique.

For more details on this report - Request for Sample

Segment Analysis

The global particle therapy market is segmented based on type, system, application, cancer type, end-user, and region.

Proton Therapy segment is expected to dominate the global particle therapy market share

The proton therapy segment is anticipated to dominate the global particle therapy market owing to its unique advantages, technological advancements, and increasing acceptance among healthcare providers and patients. Proton therapy uses charged particles, or protons, to deliver targeted radiation to malignant tumors while limiting damage to surrounding healthy tissues. This accuracy is especially useful for treating cancers near important organs, such as brain tumors or pediatric cancers, where conventional radiation therapies may represent a larger risk of collateral damage. As more people become aware of the benefits of proton therapy, demand for its utilization increases.

The increasing prevalence of cancer, as well as technological improvements that have made proton therapy more accessible and effective, are driving the segment's rise. Compact proton therapy devices and advanced imaging techniques have improved treatment delivery, resulting in more efficient patient management and better clinical outcomes. These technological advancements are critical in resolving the limits of standard photon treatment, hence strengthening proton therapy's market position.

Furthermore, the growing number of proton therapy centers worldwide contributes to the segment's dominance. Major investments and launches by healthcare organizations and governments have contributed to financing the establishment of new centers equipped with modern proton treatment devices. For instance, in February 2024, the University of Leeds initiated a trial supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the Medical Research Council (MRC) to look into a possible treatment for brain cancer. A new clinical trial concentrating on proton beam therapy for brain cancer began in the United Kingdom, representing a significant leap in cancer treatment choices. This trial, called APPROACH (Analysis of Proton vs Photon Radiotherapy in Oligodendroglioma and Assessment of Cognitive Health), seeks to determine whether proton beam therapy can lessen long-term side effects when compared to regular photon radiotherapy. The experiment is aimed specifically at patients diagnosed with oligodendroglioma, a kind of brain cancer that affects roughly 350 people in the UK each year.

Geographical Analysis

North America is expected to hold a significant position in the global particle therapy market share

North America is anticipated to hold a significant portion of the global particle therapy market owing to the rising prevalence of cancer, technological advancements, recent product launches and approvals, strategic partnerships, and increasing awareness. The higher prevalence of cancer in North America also contributes to the increased demand for advanced treatment solutions. This alarming trend highlights the critical need for effective treatment alternatives, encouraging healthcare experts and patients to look into sophisticated medicines like particle therapy. As more patients become aware of the benefits of proton therapy, they are turning to this tailored treatment technique, which allows for more precise tumor targeting while avoiding damage to adjacent healthy tissues.

For instance, according to an article published by the National Institute of Health in 2024, the United States is projected to see 2,001,140 new cancer cases. North America's dominance in the particle therapy segment is due to technological breakthroughs. The emergence of small proton therapy systems has transformed the scene by making treatment more accessible and affordable. These systems require less physical space than traditional setups, allowing more hospitals and clinics to use proton therapy in their cancer treatment options. Furthermore, advances such as pencil-beam scanning and real-time imaging technology improve the precision of proton treatment, allowing practitioners to deliver targeted radiation more effectively while reducing damage to adjacent healthy tissues. This level of accuracy is especially useful for treating tumors near essential structures, such as those found in pediatric patients or brain cancers.

For instance, in December 2023, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (OSUCCC - James) have announced the opening of a $100 million, 55,000-square-foot proton therapy center, the first treatment facility in central Ohio to provide this highly targeted form of radiation therapy for the treatment of complex tumors that cannot be removed surgically.

Asia Pacific is growing at the fastest pace in the global particle therapy market

One of the key drivers of this expansion is Asia Pacific's huge and expanding population, which contributes to an increased incidence of oncological disorders. As cancer incidence continues to increase across this diverse region, the need for advanced treatment modalities like particle therapy becomes increasingly critical.

For instance, according to the National Institute of Health, the estimated number of cancer cases in India in 2022 is 14,61,427 (crude rate: 100.4 per 100,000). In India, one in every nine people is likely to develop cancer over their lifetime. Males and females were more likely to acquire lung and breast cancers, respectively. This alarming trend underscores the urgent need for effective treatment options that can address the unique challenges posed by various types of cancer prevalent in the region.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the global particle therapy market include IBA Worldwide, Siemens Healthcare Private Limited, Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, Mevion Medical Systems, Provision Healthcare, Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc., Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd., ProTom International, B dot Medical Inc., Atlas Copco Group among others.

Emerging Players

Panacea, Terapet, and P-Cure among others

Key Developments

In September 2024, The Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) launched in-house research initiatives focused on maximizing the use of proton beam therapy for cancer treatment, marking a significant advancement in oncology care in India. This initiative coincides with the one-year anniversary of TMC's proton therapy facility, which was inaugurated to provide cutting-edge radiation treatment options for both pediatric and adult cancer patients. The facility at TMC is equipped with state-of-the-art technology, including the latest Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) capabilities and Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT).

Why Purchase the Report?

Pipeline & Innovations: Reviews ongoing clinical trials, product pipelines, and forecasts upcoming advancements in medical devices and pharmaceuticals.
Product Performance & Market Positioning: Analyzes product performance, market positioning, and growth potential to optimize strategies.
Real-world Evidence: Integrates patient feedback and data into product development for improved outcomes.
Physician Preferences & Health System Impact: Examines healthcare provider behaviors and the impact of health system mergers on adoption strategies.
Market Updates & Industry Changes: Covers recent regulatory changes, new policies, and emerging technologies.
Competitive Strategies: Analyzes competitor strategies, market share, and emerging players.
Pricing & Market Access: Reviews pricing models, reimbursement trends, and market access strategies.
Market Entry & Expansion: Identifies optimal strategies for entering new markets and partnerships.
Regional Growth & Investment: Highlights high-growth regions and investment opportunities.
Supply Chain Optimization: Assesses supply chain risks and distribution strategies for efficient product delivery.
Sustainability & Regulatory Impact: Focuses on eco-friendly practices and evolving regulations in healthcare.
Post-market Surveillance: Uses post-market data to enhance product safety and access.
Pharmacoeconomics & Value-Based Pricing: Analyzes the shift to value-based pricing and data-driven decision-making in R&D.

The global particle therapy market report delivers a detailed analysis with 60+ key tables, more than 50 visually impactful figures, and 176 pages of expert insights, providing a complete view of the market landscape.

Target Audience 2024

Manufacturers: Pharmaceutical, Medical Device, Biotech Companies, Contract Manufacturers, Distributors, Hospitals.
Regulatory & Policy: Compliance Officers, Government, Health Economists, Market Access Specialists.
Technology & Innovation: AI/Robotics Providers, R&D Professionals, Clinical Trial Managers, Pharmacovigilance Experts.
Investors: Healthcare Investors, Venture Fund Investors, Pharma Marketing & Sales.
Consulting & Advisory: Healthcare Consultants, Industry Associations, Analysts.
Supply Chain: Distribution and Supply Chain Managers.
Consumers & Advocacy: Patients, Advocacy Groups, Insurance Companies.
Academic & Research: Academic Institutions.

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Technology
3.2. Snippet by Cancer Type
3.3. Snippet by Application
3.4. Snippet by End-User
3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
- 4.1.2. Increasing Demand for Particle Therapy
- 4.1.3. Restraints
- 4.1.4. High Initial Costs
- 4.1.5. Opportunity
- 4.1.6. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. Reimbursement Analysis
5.6. Patent Analysis
5.7. SWOT Analysis
5.8. DMI Opinion

6. By Type

6.1. Introduction
- 6.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
6.2. Proton Therapy*
- 6.2.1. Introduction
- 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
6.3. Heavy Ion Therapy

7. By System

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By System
7.2. Single Room Systems*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Multi-room Systems

8. By Application

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Application
8.2. Treatment*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Clinical Research

9. By Cancer Type

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Cancer Type
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Cancer Type
9.2. Pediatric Cancer*
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
9.3. Breast Cancer
9.4. Lung Cancer
9.5. Neck Cancer
9.6. Others

10. By End User

10.1. Introduction
- 10.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End User
- 10.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End User
10.2. Hospitals*
- 10.2.1. Introduction
- 10.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
10.3. Cancer Research Institutes
10.4. Diagnostic Centres

11. By Region

11.1. Introduction
- 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
11.2. North America
- 11.2.1. Introduction
- 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System
- 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Cancer Type
- 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.2.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.2.8.1. U.S.
  - 11.2.8.2. Canada
  - 11.2.8.3. Mexico
11.3. Europe
- 11.3.1. Introduction
- 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System
- 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Cancer Type
- 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.3.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.3.8.1. Germany
  - 11.3.8.2. U.K.
  - 11.3.8.3. France
  - 11.3.8.4. Spain
  - 11.3.8.5. Italy
  - 11.3.8.6. Rest of Europe
11.4. South America
- 11.4.1. Introduction
- 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.4.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System
- 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Cancer Type
- 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.4.8.1. Brazil
  - 11.4.8.2. Argentina
  - 11.4.8.3. Rest of South America
11.5. Asia-Pacific
- 11.5.1. Introduction
- 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System
- 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Cancer Type
- 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.5.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.5.8.1. China
  - 11.5.8.2. India
  - 11.5.8.3. Japan
  - 11.5.8.4. South Korea
  - 11.5.8.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.6. Middle East and Africa
- 11.6.1. Introduction
- 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System
- 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Application
- 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Cancer Type
- 11.6.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

12. Competitive Landscape

12.1. Competitive Scenario
12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

13.1. IBA Worldwide*
- 13.1.1. Company Overview
- 13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 13.1.3. Financial Overview
- 13.1.4. Key Developments
13.2. Siemens Healthcare Private Limited
13.3. Hitachi High-Tech Corporation
13.4. Mevion Medical Systems
13.5. Provision Healthcare
13.6. Optivus Proton Therapy, Inc.
13.7. Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd.
13.8. ProTom International
13.9. B dot Medical Inc.
13.10. Atlas Copco Group

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE