首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 基础设施

水处理

市场调查报告书

商品编码

1654715

全球营养回收系统市场 - 2025 至 2032 年

Global Nutrient Recovery Systems Market - 2025-2032

出版日期: 2025年02月13日 | 出版商:

DataM Intelligence | 英文 205 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

2024 年全球营养回收系统市场规模达到 51.1 亿美元，预计到 2032 年将达到 122 亿美元，在 2025-2032 年预测期内的复合年增长率为 11.5%。

受日益增长的环境问题和永续农业实践需求的推动，全球营养物回收系统市场正在经历大幅增长。这种增长归因于废水处理中营养物回收技术的日益普及以及农业部门对高效营养物管理解决方案的需求。

营养物回收系统的创新，例如增强生物处理和化学沉淀方法，正在提高从废水中提取营养物的效率。这些进步有助于生产高品质的肥料，支持永续农业。越来越多的产业采用循环经济实践，将废物流中的营养物质回收到生产週期中。这种方法不仅减少了环境污染，而且还提高了资源效率并节省了成本。

在工业化和基础设施建设加速的推动下，亚太地区的营养物回收系统市场正在快速成长。中国和印度等国家正成为营养物回收系统成长最快的市场。该国快速的工业化和城市化导致大量废水产生，需要先进的营养物回收解决方案。政府注重环境永续性的措施和严格的废水处理法规正在推动中国采用营养物回收技术。

动力学

环境法规与永续农业

世界各地严格的环境法规迫使工业界和市政当局采用营养物回收系统来减轻水污染并促进永续农业。过量的营养物质（尤其是氮和磷）排放到水体会导致水体富营养化，造成藻类大量繁殖和水质恶化。

为了解决这个问题，监管机构制定了控制营养物质排放的指导方针。例如，美国环保署（EPA）已经实施了营养物管理策略，以减少水体的营养物污染。同样，欧盟的水框架指令要求成员国透过管理营养水准来实现良好的水质状况。

在农业领域，营养回收系统能够将废物流中的营养物质回收为肥料，促进永续的农业实践。这种方法减少了对合成肥料的依赖，合成肥料的生产需要耗费大量的能源，而且会导致温室气体排放。透过从动物粪便和废水等来源回收养分，农民可以提高土壤肥力，同时最大限度地减少对环境的影响。

对水质的担忧日益加剧

人们越来越担心营养物污染导致的水质下降，这推动了营养物回收系统的采用。农田流失的营养物质和污水处理厂的排放导致水体的营养物质水平升高，从而造成生态失衡。美国环保署的营养研究强调了营养污染对水生生态系统的影响，包括缺氧和生物多样性丧失。

为了解决这些问题，正在实施营养物回收系统，以便在排放前去除废水中多余的营养物，从而保护水质。各市政当局正投资包含营养物回收过程的先进废水处理技术。这些系统不仅符合监管标准，而且还透过生产可用作肥料的鸟粪石等有价值的副产品来提供经济效益。

高昂的资本和营运成本

儘管具有环境和经济效益，但营养物回收系统的采用往往受到高昂的资本和营运成本的阻碍。建立先进的营养物回收设施的初始投资可能相当大，包括与设备、安装和整合到现有废水处理基础设施相关的费用。营运成本（包括能源消耗、维护和劳动力）进一步增加了财务负担。

例如，鸟粪石结晶等技术需要精确控制操作参数，这会导致能源使用量和相关成本的增加。美国环保署（EPA）的一项研究强调，虽然营养物回收技术可以带来长期利益，但前期成本和操作的复杂性可能是广泛采用的重大障碍，特别是对于财力有限的小城市和产业而言。

The global nutrient recovery systems market is experiencing substantial growth, driven by increasing environmental concerns and the need for sustainable agricultural practices. This growth is attributed to the rising implementation of nutrient recovery technologies in wastewater treatment and the agricultural sector's demand for efficient nutrient management solutions..

Innovations in nutrient recovery systems, such as enhanced biological treatments and chemical precipitation methods, are improving the efficiency of nutrient extraction from wastewater. The advancements contribute to the production of high-quality fertilizers, supporting sustainable agriculture. Industries are increasingly adopting circular economy practices by recycling nutrients from waste streams back into production cycles. This approach not only reduces environmental pollution but also promotes resource efficiency and cost savings.

Asia-Pacific is experiencing rapid growth in the nutrient recovery systems market, driven by accelerated industrialization and infrastructure development. Countries such as China and India are emerging as the fastest-growing market for nutrient recovery systems. The country's rapid industrialization and urbanization have led to significant wastewater generation, necessitating advanced nutrient recovery solutions. Government initiatives focusing on environmental sustainability and stringent regulations on wastewater treatment are propelling the adoption of nutrient recovery technologies in China.

Dynamics

Environmental Regulations and Sustainable Agriculture

Stringent environmental regulations worldwide are compelling industries and municipalities to adopt nutrient recovery systems to mitigate water pollution and promote sustainable agriculture. Excessive nutrient discharge, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, into water bodies leads to eutrophication, causing algal blooms and deteriorating water quality.

To address this, regulatory bodies have established guidelines to control nutrient emissions. For instance, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented nutrient management strategies to reduce nutrient pollution in water bodies. Similarly, the European Union's Water Framework Directive mandates member states to achieve good water status by managing nutrient levels.

In agriculture, nutrient recovery systems enable the recycling of nutrients from waste streams into fertilizers, promoting sustainable farming practices. This approach reduces the reliance on synthetic fertilizers, which are energy-intensive to produce and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. By recovering nutrients from sources like animal manure and wastewater, farmers can enhance soil fertility while minimizing environmental impacts.

Rising Concerns Over Water Quality

Growing concerns about water quality degradation due to nutrient pollution are driving the adoption of nutrient recovery systems. Nutrient runoff from agricultural fields and discharge from wastewater treatment plants contribute to elevated nutrient levels in water bodies, leading to ecological imbalances. The EPA's nutrient research highlights the impact of nutrient pollution on aquatic ecosystems, including hypoxia and loss of biodiversity.

To combat these issues, nutrient recovery systems are being implemented to remove excess nutrients from wastewater before discharge, thereby protecting water quality. Municipalities are investing in advanced wastewater treatment technologies that incorporate nutrient recovery processes. These systems not only comply with regulatory standards but also provide economic benefits by producing valuable by-products like struvite, which can be used as fertilizer.

High Capital and Operational Costs

Despite the environmental and economic benefits, the adoption of nutrient recovery systems is often hindered by high capital and operational costs. The initial investment for setting up advanced nutrient recovery facilities can be substantial, encompassing expenses related to equipment, installation and integration into existing wastewater treatment infrastructures. Operational costs, including energy consumption, maintenance and labor, further add to the financial burden.

For example, technologies like struvite crystallization require precise control of operational parameters, which can lead to increased energy usage and associated costs. A study by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) highlights that while nutrient recovery technologies offer long-term benefits, the upfront costs and complexity of operations can be significant barriers for widespread adoption, especially for smaller municipalities and industries with limited financial resources.

Segment Analysis

The global nutrient recovery systems market is segmented based on type, system type, technology, end-user and region.

Critical Need to ensure the Safety, Reliability and Longevity of Aircraft Structures

The agricultural sector represents the highest demand for nutrient recovery systems, driven by the need for sustainable nutrient management and the rising costs of synthetic fertilizers. Recovered nutrients, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, are essential for crop growth and soil fertility. Traditional agricultural practices often rely on chemical fertilizers, which can lead to nutrient runoff, water pollution and soil degradation. Nutrient recovery systems offer a sustainable alternative by capturing nutrients from waste streams, such as animal manure and agricultural runoff and converting them into valuable fertilizers.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) supports nutrient recovery initiatives to promote sustainable farming practices. By implementing nutrient recovery systems, farmers can reduce their reliance on chemical fertilizers, lower production costs and minimize environmental impacts. Furthermore, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) emphasizes the importance of nutrient recycling in achieving global food security and sustainable agriculture. The adoption of nutrient recovery systems aligns with these objectives, contributing to improved soil health, increased crop yields and reduced environmental pollution.

Geographical Penetration

Advanced Industrial Infrastructure of North America Drives the demand of Nutrient Recovery Systems

North America holds a significant share in the global nutrient recovery systems market, attributed to stringent environmental regulations, advanced wastewater treatment infrastructure and a strong emphasis on sustainable practices. The United States and Canada are prominent players, with both countries investing heavily in nutrient recycling technologies and sustainable agricultural practices. Government incentives and policies supporting circular economy principles further bolster market growth.

The North American market benefits from well-established waste management systems and a high level of consumer and industry awareness regarding environmental issues, driving the adoption of nutrient recycling solutions. Additionally, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations advocates for sustainable nutrient management practices to ensure food security and environmental health. The integration of nutrient recovery systems in agricultural operations aligns with these global efforts, driving market growth.

Competitive Landscape

The major global players in the market include Lenntech, Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies, Trident Process Inc, CNP - Centrisys, Xylem, DVO Inc, CLEARAS Water Recovery, NuReSys, Royal Haskoning DHV and Alfa Laval.

Sustainable Analysis

The nutrient recycling market aligns closely with global sustainability goals, particularly the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 12, which emphasizes responsible consumption and production. By recovering nutrients from waste streams, these systems reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers, thereby decreasing greenhouse gas emissions associated with fertilizer production. For instance, traditional ammonia production accounts for 2% of global carbon emissions, while innovative approaches using renewable energy for ammonia synthesis can significantly lower this footprint.

Economic sustainability is also enhanced, as nutrient recycling can lead to cost savings for industries and municipalities by reducing waste disposal costs and creating valuable by-products like biogas and organic fertilizers. For example, companies like Yara International are investing in green ammonia plants, aiming to produce fertilizers with a lower carbon footprint, thereby supporting sustainable agriculture. By capturing and reusing nutrients, the risk of water pollution is reduced, contributing to healthier aquatic ecosystems.

Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT)

AI-driven systems analyze vast amounts of data, identifying patterns and optimizing operations in real-time. In industrial sectors, AI-powered predictive maintenance minimizes downtime by detecting equipment failures before they occur. IoT sensors continuously monitor machine performance, sending alerts for maintenance needs. This integration has led to significant cost savings; for example, predictive maintenance reduces machinery downtime by 20-50% and extends asset life by 20-40%.

The combination of AI and IoT is transforming urban landscapes into smart cities. AI-driven traffic management systems optimize traffic flow, reducing congestion and lowering emissions. IoT-enabled smart grids enhance energy distribution by analyzing consumption patterns and adjusting supply accordingly. A study by the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that smart grids reduce energy losses by up to 30%.

Key Developments

On April 17, 2024, NPHarvest, a spin-off from Aalto University, successfully raised EUR 2.2 million to commercialize its proprietary nutrient recovery technology. NPHarvest's innovative wastewater treatment equipment effectively captures excess nutrients from concentrated wastewater streams, allowing them to be recycled and sold back to the fertilizer industry.
On April 23, 2024, Portland-based Nutrient Recovery Services announced the launch of a "first-of-its-kind" sustainably produced fertilizer derived from its building's waste, rainwater and solar energy. The company operates within the PAE Building, a recognized "living building" that adheres to rigorous environmental standards. This innovative approach marks a significant milestone in the circular economy by recycling nutrients into a fossil fuel-free fertilizer alternative.
On September 15, 2022, Biolan Oy, Gasum Oy and Poytyan Maanparannus Oy formed Kiertoravinne Oy, a joint venture dedicated to enhancing the biogas value chain through nutrient recycling. This partnership focuses on supplying digestate-based fertilizers and recycled nutrients sourced from biogas plants.

By Type

Nitrogen recovery systems
Phosphorus recovery systems
Potassium recovery systems
Lithium recovery systems
Others

By System Type

Centralized System
Decentralized System

By Technology

Struvite Precipitation
Biogas Production
Composting
Membrane Separation
Others

By End-User

Industrial
- Agriculture
- Fertilizer Industry
- Food & beverage
- Chemical manufacturing
- Others
Municipal nutrient recovery systems
- Wastewater treatment plants
- City planning and development

By Region

North America
- US
- Canada
- Mexico
Europe
- Germany
- UK
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa

Why Purchase the Report?

To visualize the global nutrient recovery systems market segmentation based on type, system type, technology, end-user and region.
Identify commercial opportunities by analyzing trends and co-development.
Excel data sheet with numerous data points at the nutrient recovery systems market level for all segments.
PDF report consists of a comprehensive analysis after exhaustive qualitative interviews and an in-depth study.
Product mapping available as excel consisting of key products of all the major players.

The global nutrient recovery systems market report would provide approximately 70 tables, 64 figures and 205 pages.

Target Audience 2024

Manufacturers/ Buyers
Industry Investors/Investment Bankers
Research Professionals
Emerging Companies

1. Methodology and Scope

1.1. Research Methodology
1.2. Research Objective and Scope of the Report

2. Definition and Overview

3. Executive Summary

3.1. Snippet by Type
3.2. Snippet by System Type
3.3. Snippet by Technology
3.4. Snippet by End-User
3.5. Snippet by Region

4. Dynamics

4.1. Impacting Factors
- 4.1.1. Drivers
  - 4.1.1.1. Environmental Regulations and Sustainable Agriculture
  - 4.1.1.2. Rising Concerns Over Water Quality
- 4.1.2. Restraints
  - 4.1.2.1. High Capital and Operational Costs
- 4.1.3. Opportunity
- 4.1.4. Impact Analysis

5. Industry Analysis

5.1. Porter's Five Force Analysis
5.2. Supply Chain Analysis
5.3. Pricing Analysis
5.4. Regulatory Analysis
5.5. Sustainable Analysis
5.6. DMI Opinion

6. By Type

6.1. Introduction
- 6.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 6.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Type
6.2. Nitrogen recovery systems*
- 6.2.1. Introduction
- 6.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
6.3. Phosphorus recovery systems
6.4. Potassium recovery systems
6.5. Lithium recovery systems
6.6. Others

7. By System Type

7.1. Introduction
- 7.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System Type
- 7.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By System Type
7.2. Centralized System*
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
7.3. Decentralized System

8. By Technology

8.1. Introduction
- 8.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 8.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
8.2. Struvite Precipitation*
- 8.2.1. Introduction
- 8.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
8.3. Biogas Production
8.4. Composting
8.5. Membrane Separation
8.6. Others

9. By End-User

9.1. Introduction
- 9.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 9.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By End-User
9.2. Industrial*
- 9.2.1. Introduction
- 9.2.2. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%)
  - 9.2.2.1. Agriculture
  - 9.2.2.2. Fertilizer Industry
  - 9.2.2.3. Food & beverage
  - 9.2.2.4. Chemical manufacturing
  - 9.2.2.5. Others
9.3. Municipal nutrient recovery systems

10. Sustainability Analysis

10.1. Environmental Analysis
10.2. Economic Analysis
10.3. Governance Analysis

11. By Region

11.1. Introduction
- 11.1.1. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Region
- 11.1.2. Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
11.2. North America
- 11.2.1. Introduction
- 11.2.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.2.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.2.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System Type
- 11.2.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 11.2.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.2.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.2.7.1. US
  - 11.2.7.2. Canada
  - 11.2.7.3. Mexico
11.3. Europe
- 11.3.1. Introduction
- 11.3.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.3.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.3.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System Type
- 11.3.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 11.3.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.3.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.3.7.1. Germany
  - 11.3.7.2. UK
  - 11.3.7.3. France
  - 11.3.7.4. Italy
  - 11.3.7.5. Spain
  - 11.3.7.6. Rest of Europe
11.4. South America
- 11.4.1. Introduction
- 11.4.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.4.3. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.4.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.4.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System Type
- 11.4.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 11.4.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.4.8. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.4.8.1. Brazil
  - 11.4.8.2. Argentina
  - 11.4.8.3. Rest of South America
11.5. Asia-Pacific
- 11.5.1. Introduction
- 11.5.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.5.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.5.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System Type
- 11.5.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 11.5.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User
- 11.5.7. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Country
  - 11.5.7.1. China
  - 11.5.7.2. India
  - 11.5.7.3. Japan
  - 11.5.7.4. Australia
  - 11.5.7.5. Rest of Asia-Pacific
11.6. Middle East and Africa
- 11.6.1. Introduction
- 11.6.2. Key Region-Specific Dynamics
- 11.6.3. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Type
- 11.6.4. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By System Type
- 11.6.5. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By Technology
- 11.6.6. Market Size Analysis and Y-o-Y Growth Analysis (%), By End-User

12. Competitive Landscape

12.1. Competitive Scenario
12.2. Market Positioning/Share Analysis
12.3. Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis

13. Company Profiles

13.1. Lenntech*
- 13.1.1. Company Overview
- 13.1.2. Product Portfolio and Description
- 13.1.3. Financial Overview
- 13.1.4. Key Developments
13.2. Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies,
13.3. Trident Process Inc
13.4. CNP - Centrisys,
13.5. Xylem
13.6. DVO Inc
13.7. CLEARAS Water Recovery
13.8. NuReSys
13.9. Royal Haskoning DHV
13.10. Alfa Laval.

LIST NOT EXHAUSTIVE

14. Appendix

14.1. About Us and Services
14.2. Contact Us

02-2729-4219

+886-2-2729-4219

License/价格

全球营养回收系统市场 - 2025 至 2032 年

Global Nutrient Recovery Systems Market - 2025-2032

目录

第 1 章：方法与范围

第 2 章：定义与概述

第 3 章：执行摘要

第 4 章：动态

第五章：产业分析

第 6 章：按类型

第 7 章：按系统类型

第 8 章：按技术

第 9 章：按最终用户

第 10 章：可持续性分析

第 11 章：按地区

第 12 章：竞争格局

第 13 章：公司简介

第 14 章：附录