生物分解和可堆肥包装的全球市场(2025-2035)
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1563427

生物分解和可堆肥包装的全球市场(2025-2035)

The Global Market for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging 2025-2035

出版日期: | 出版商: Future Markets, Inc. | 英文 324 Pages, 54 Tables, 73 Figures | 订单完成后即时交付

价格

由于环保意识的增强、严格的法规以及消费者对永续产品偏好的变化,生物分解和可堆肥包装市场呈现快速成长。该行业提供了传统塑胶包装的环保替代品,并已成为全球包装行业的重要组成部分。目前,该市场的特点是材料和技术多样,包括聚乳酸(PLA)、聚羟基脂肪酸酯(PHA)、淀粉基混合物和纤维素基包装解决方案。这些材料用于多种行业,但由于人们对食品供应链中塑胶废弃物的担忧日益增加,食品包装已成为最大的区隔。包装行业的领先公司大力投资研发,以提高生物分解材料的性能和成本效益。同时,许多新创公司和创新公司正带着新颖的解决方案进入市场,例如基于海藻的包装和菌丝体衍生材料。在这个市场中,可看到可堆肥包装的发展趋势,这种包装可以在家庭堆肥中分解,以解决工业堆肥基础设施的限制。此外,人们的注意力集中在多功能包装的开发上,这种包装不仅生物分解,而且还能延长产品的保存期限并融入智慧技术。

儘管生物分解包装市场不断成长,但仍面临一些挑战,例如与传统塑胶相比,生产成本更高、某些应用的性能有限以及需要适当的废弃物管理基础设施。然而,持续的技术进步和规模经济逐渐解决这些问题。随着世界走向永续发展,生物分解和可堆肥包装市场预计将继续呈上升趋势。随着大公司获得有前途的技术,各行业可能会看到更多的创新、跨部门的采用增加以及整合的增加。这种成长不仅重塑了包装产业,也为全球减少塑胶废弃物和环境污染的努力做出了重大贡献。

本报告研究和分析了全球生物分解和可堆肥包装市场,包括市场规模和成长预测、材料创新的详细资讯、使用情况、竞争格局以及对永续性的影响。

目录

第1章 执行摘要

  • 世界包装市场
  • 生物分解和可堆肥包装市场
    • 依生物基塑胶类型
    • 依包装产品类型
    • 依最终用途市场
    • 依地区
  • 主要类型
    • 醋酸纤维素
    • PLA
    • 脂肪族芳香族共聚酯
    • PHA
    • 淀粉/淀粉混合物
  • 价格
  • 市场趋势
  • 生物分解和可堆肥包装近期成长的市场驱动力
  • 生物分解和可堆肥包装的挑战

第2章 可生物分解和可堆肥包装中的生物基材料

  • 材料创新
  • 活性包装
  • 单一材料包装
  • 用于包装的传统高分子材料
    • 聚烯烃:聚丙烯和聚乙烯
    • PET 和其他聚酯聚合物
    • 用于包装的再生生物基聚合物
    • 合成化石基聚合物与生物基聚合物的比较
    • 包装中的生物塑胶过程
    • 生物基永续包装废弃物处理
  • 合成生物基包装材料
    • 聚乳酸(Bio PLA)
    • 聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(Bio PET)
    • 聚对苯二甲酸丙二醇酯(Bio PTT)
    • 聚乙烯呋喃酸酯(Bio PEF)
    • 生物PA
    • 聚(己二酸-对苯二甲酸丁二醇酯)(Bio PBAT)- 脂肪族芳香族共聚酯
    • 聚丁二酸丁二醇酯(PBS)及其共聚物
    • 聚丙烯(Bio PP)
  • 天然生物基包装材料
    • 聚羟基链烷酸(PHA)
    • 淀粉基混合物
    • 纤维素
    • 包装材料中的蛋白质生物塑胶
    • 包装用脂类和蜡
    • 海藻包装
    • 菌丝体
    • 壳聚醣
    • 生物石脑油

第3章 市场与应用

  • 纸/纸板包装
  • 食品包装
    • 生物基薄膜、托盘
    • 生物基小袋、袋子
    • 生物基纺织品,网
    • 生物黏合剂
    • 阻隔涂层、薄膜
    • 主动智慧食品包装
    • 抗菌膜、抗菌剂
    • 生物基油墨、染料
    • 可食用薄膜、涂层
  • 包装中的生物基薄膜和涂料
    • 摘要
    • 使用生物基油漆和涂料的挑战
    • 包装中使用的生物基涂料和薄膜的类型
  • 用于包装的碳回收材料
    • 在塑胶原料中使用碳的优点
    • 二氧化碳衍生的聚合物和塑胶
    • 二氧化碳利用产品
  • 软包装
  • 硬包装
  • 涂层、薄膜

第4章 公司简介(230家公司简介)

第5章 研究方法

第6章 参考文献

The market for biodegradable and compostable packaging is experiencing rapid growth, driven by increasing environmental awareness, stringent regulations, and shifting consumer preferences towards sustainable products. This sector has emerged as a crucial component of the global packaging industry, offering eco-friendly alternatives to traditional plastic packaging. Currently, the market is characterized by a diverse range of materials and technologies, including polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), starch-based blends, and cellulose-derived packaging solutions. These materials are finding applications across various industries, with food packaging representing the largest segment due to growing concerns about plastic waste in the food supply chain. Major players in the packaging industry are investing heavily in research and development to improve the performance and cost-effectiveness of biodegradable materials. Simultaneously, numerous start-ups and innovative companies are entering the market with novel solutions, such as seaweed-based packaging and mycelium-derived materials. The market is witnessing a trend towards the development of compostable packaging that can break down in home composting conditions, addressing the limitations of industrial composting infrastructure. Additionally, there is a growing focus on creating multi-functional packaging that not only biodegrades but also offers enhanced shelf life for products or incorporates smart technologies.

Despite its growth, the biodegradable packaging market faces challenges, including higher production costs compared to conventional plastics, performance limitations in certain applications, and the need for proper waste management infrastructure. However, ongoing technological advancements and economies of scale are gradually addressing these issues. As the global push for sustainability intensifies, the biodegradable and compostable packaging market is expected to continue its upward trajectory. The industry is likely to see further innovations, increased adoption across various sectors, and potential consolidation as larger companies acquire promising technologies. This growth is not only reshaping the packaging industry but also contributing significantly to global efforts in reducing plastic waste and environmental pollution.

"The Global Market for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging 2025-2035" provides a thorough examination of the market landscape from 2025 to 2035, offering valuable insights for manufacturers, investors, and stakeholders in the sustainable packaging ecosystem.

Report contents include:

  • Market Size and Growth Projections: Detailed forecasts of the biodegradable and compostable packaging market size and growth rate from 2025 to 2035, segmented by product type, material, end-use industry, and region.
  • Material Innovation Deep Dive: Comprehensive analysis of both synthetic and natural biobased packaging materials, including PLA, Bio-PET, PHA, starch-based blends, and emerging solutions like mycelium and seaweed-based packaging.
  • Application Landscape: Exploration of key application areas such as food packaging, consumer goods, pharmaceuticals, and e-commerce, with insights into specific requirements and growth opportunities.
  • Competitive Landscape: Profiles of leading companies and emerging players in the biodegradable packaging space, including their technologies, strategies, and market positioning. Companies profiled include 9Fiber, Inc., ADBioplastics, Advanced Biochemical (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Aeropowder Limited, AGRANA Staerke GmbH, Ahlstrom-Munksjo Oyj, Alberta Innovates/Innotech Materials, LLC, Alter Eco Pulp, Alterpacks, AmicaTerra, An Phat Bioplastics, Anellotech, Inc., Ankor Bioplastics Co., Ltd., ANPOLY, Inc., Apeel Sciences, Applied Bioplastics, Aquapak Polymers Ltd, Archer Daniel Midland Company (ADM), Arekapak GmbH, Arkema S.A, Arrow Greentech, Asahi Kasei Chemicals Corporation, Attis Innovations, llc, Avani Eco, Avantium B.V., Avient Corporation, Balrampur Chini Mills, BASF SE, Bio Fab NZ, Bio Plast Pom, Bio2Coat, Bioelements Group, Biofibre GmbH, Bioform Technologies, Biokemik, BIOLO, BioLogiQ, Inc., Biome Bioplastics, Biomass Resin Holdings Co., Ltd., BIO-FED, BIO-LUTIONS International AG, Bioplastech Ltd, BioSmart Nano, BIOTEC GmbH & Co. KG, Biovox GmbH, BlockTexx Pty Ltd., Blue Ocean Closures, Bluepha Beijing Lanjing Microbiology Technology Co., Ltd., BOBST, Borealis AG, Brightplus Oy, Business Innovation Partners Co., Ltd., Carbiolice, Carbios, Cardia Bioplastics Ltd., CARAPAC Company, Cass Materials Pty Ltd, Celanese Corporation, Cellugy, Cellutech AB (Stora Enso), Chemkey Advanced Materials Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Chemol Company (Seydel), CJ Biomaterials, Inc., Coastgrass ApS, Corumat, Inc., Cruz Foam, CuanTec Ltd., Daicel Polymer Ltd., Daio Paper Corporation, Danimer Scientific LLC, DIC Corporation, DIC Products, Inc., DKS Co. Ltd., Dow, Inc., DuFor Resins B.V., DuPont, Earthodic Pty Ltd., EarthForm, Ecomann Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Ecoshell, EcoSynthetix, Inc., Ecovia Renewables, Enkev, Epoch Biodesign, Eranova, Esbottle Oy, Fiberlean Technologies, Fiberwood Oy, FKuR Kunststoff GmbH, Floreon, Footprint, Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research ISC, Full Cycle Bioplastics LLC, Futamura Chemical Co., Ltd., Futuramat Sarl, Futurity Bio-Ventures Ltd., Genecis Bioindustries, Inc., Grabio Greentech Corporation, Granbio Technologies, GreenNano Technologies Inc., GS Alliance Co. Ltd, Guangzhou Bio-plus Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Hokuetsu Toyo Fibre Co., Ltd., Holmen Iggesund, IUV Srl, Jiangsu Jinhe Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Torise Biomaterials Co., Ltd, JinHui ZhaoLang High Technology Co., Ltd., Kagzi Bottles Private Limited, Kami Shoji Company, Kaneka Corporation, Kelpi Industries Ltd., Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co. Ltd., Klabin S.A., Lactips S.A., LAM'ON, LanzaTech, Licella, Lignin Industries, Loick Biowertstoff GmbH, LOTTE Chemical Corporation, MadeRight, MakeGrowLab, Marea, Marine Innovation Co., Ltd, Melodea Ltd., Mi Terro, Inc., Mitr Phol, Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation, Mitsubishi Polyester Film GmbH, Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., Mobius, Mondi, Multibax Public Co., Ltd., Nabaco, Inc., NatPol, Nature Coatings, Inc., NatureWorks LLC, New Zealand Natural Fibers (NZNF), Newlight Technologies, NEXE Innovations Inc., Nippon Paper Industries, Notpla, Novamont S.p.A., Novomer, Oimo, Oji Paper Company, Omya, one - five GmbH, Origin Materials, Pack2Earth, Paptic Ltd., Pivot Materials LLC, Plafco Fibertech Oy, Plantic Technologies Ltd., Plantics B.V., Poliloop, Polyferm Canada, Pond Biomaterials, Provenance Biofabrics, Inc., PT Intera Lestari Polimer, PTT MCC Biochem Co., Ltd., Qnature UG, Rengo Co., Ltd., Rise Innventia AB, Rodenburg Productie B.V., Roquette S.A., RWDC Industries, S.lab, Sappi Limited, Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (SABIC), Searo, Shellworks, Shenzhen Ecomann Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Sirmax Group, SK Chemicals Co., Ltd., Solvay SA, Spectrus Sustainable Solutions Pvt Ltd, Spero Renewables, StePAc, Stora Enso Oyj, Sufresca, Sulapac Oy, Sulzer Chemtech AG, SUPLA Bioplastics, Sway Innovation Co., Sweetwater Energy, Taghleef Industries Llc, Teal Bioworks, Inc., TemperPack-R Technologies, Termotecnica, TerraVerdae BioWorks Inc, Tianjin GreenBio Materials Co., Ltd, Ticinoplast, TIPA, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd., Toraphene, TotalEnergies Corbion, Universal Bio Pack Co., Ltd., UPM Biochemicals, UPM-Kymmene Oyj, Valentis Nanotech, Vegea srl, Verso Corporation, Weidmann Fiber Technology, Woamy Oy, Woodly Ltd., Worn Again Technologies, Xampla, Yangi, Yokohama Bio Frontier, Inc., Zelfo Technology, ZeroCircle, Zhejiang Jinjiahao Green Nanomaterial Co., Ltd.
  • Sustainability Impact: Assessment of the environmental benefits and challenges associated with biodegradable and compostable packaging, including life cycle analyses and circular economy initiatives.
  • Recent developments in biodegradable packaging technology.
  • Market Drivers and Opportunities.
  • Challenges and Market Dynamics
  • Regional Analysis and Market Opportunities
  • In-depth analysis of biodegradable packaging applications across various industries:
    • Food and Beverage: Largest market segment with diverse applications from fresh produce to dairy packaging
    • Consumer Goods: Growing demand in personal care and household products
    • Pharmaceutical: Increasing use of bioplastics in medical packaging and drug delivery systems
    • E-commerce: Rising adoption of sustainable packaging solutions for online retail
  • Materials Benchmarking and Performance Analysis
  • Manufacturing and Processing Innovations
    • Improvements in extrusion and thermoforming processes
    • Novel approaches to enhance material properties
    • Scalability considerations for mass production
    • Quality control and testing methodologies
  • Investment Landscape and Market Opportunities
  • Regulatory Framework and Standards

As the world moves towards more sustainable packaging solutions, understanding the biodegradable and compostable packaging market is crucial for:

  • Packaging manufacturers looking to expand their product portfolio
  • Brand owners seeking to meet sustainability goals and consumer demands
  • Investors interested in high-growth areas of the packaging industry
  • Policy makers developing regulations for sustainable packaging
  • Researchers and material scientists working on next-generation packaging solutions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

  • 1.1. Global Packaging Market
  • 1.2. The Market for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
    • 1.2.1. By biobased plastics type
    • 1.2.2. By packaging product type
    • 1.2.3. By end-use market
    • 1.2.4. By region
  • 1.3. Main types
    • 1.3.1. Cellulose acetate
    • 1.3.2. PLA
    • 1.3.3. Aliphatic-aromatic co-polyesters
    • 1.3.4. PHA
    • 1.3.5. Starch/starch blends
  • 1.4. Prices
  • 1.5. Market Trends
  • 1.6. Market Drivers for recent growth in Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
  • 1.7. Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging

2. BIOBASED MATERIALS IN BIODEGRADABLE AND COMPOSTABLE PACKAGING

  • 2.1. Materials innovation
  • 2.2. Active packaging
  • 2.3. Monomaterial packaging
  • 2.4. Conventional polymer materials used in packaging
    • 2.4.1. Polyolefins: Polypropylene and polyethylene
      • 2.4.1.1. Overview
      • 2.4.1.2. Grades
      • 2.4.1.3. Producers
    • 2.4.2. PET and other polyester polymers
      • 2.4.2.1. Overview
    • 2.4.3. Renewable and bio-based polymers for packaging
    • 2.4.4. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers
    • 2.4.5. Processes for bioplastics in packaging
    • 2.4.6. End-of-life treatment of bio-based and sustainable packaging
  • 2.5. Synthetic bio-based packaging materials
    • 2.5.1. Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA)
      • 2.5.1.1. Overview
      • 2.5.1.2. Properties
      • 2.5.1.3. Applications
      • 2.5.1.4. Advantages
      • 2.5.1.5. Challenges
      • 2.5.1.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.2. Polyethylene terephthalate (Bio-PET)
      • 2.5.2.1. Overview
      • 2.5.2.2. Properties
      • 2.5.2.3. Applications
      • 2.5.2.4. Advantages of Bio-PET in Packaging
      • 2.5.2.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.2.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.3. Polytrimethylene terephthalate (Bio-PTT)
      • 2.5.3.1. Overview
      • 2.5.3.2. Production Process
      • 2.5.3.3. Properties
      • 2.5.3.4. Applications
      • 2.5.3.5. Advantages of Bio-PTT in Packaging
      • 2.5.3.6. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.3.7. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.4. Polyethylene furanoate (Bio-PEF)
      • 2.5.4.1. Overview
      • 2.5.4.2. Properties
      • 2.5.4.3. Applications
      • 2.5.4.4. Advantages of Bio-PEF in Packaging
      • 2.5.4.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.4.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.5. Bio-PA
      • 2.5.5.1. Overview
      • 2.5.5.2. Properties
      • 2.5.5.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.5.4. Advantages of Bio-PA in Packaging
      • 2.5.5.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.5.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.6. Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (Bio-PBAT)- Aliphatic aromatic copolyesters
      • 2.5.6.1. Overview
      • 2.5.6.2. Properties
      • 2.5.6.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.6.4. Advantages of Bio-PBAT in Packaging
      • 2.5.6.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.6.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.7. Polybutylene succinate (PBS) and copolymers
      • 2.5.7.1. Overview
      • 2.5.7.2. Properties
      • 2.5.7.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.7.4. Advantages of Bio-PBS and Co-polymers in Packaging
      • 2.5.7.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.7.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.5.8. Polypropylene (Bio-PP)
      • 2.5.8.1. Overview
      • 2.5.8.2. Properties
      • 2.5.8.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.5.8.4. Advantages of Bio-PP in Packaging
      • 2.5.8.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.5.8.6. Commercial examples
  • 2.6. Natural bio-based packaging materials
    • 2.6.1. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)
      • 2.6.1.1. Properties
      • 2.6.1.2. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.6.1.3. Advantages of PHA in Packaging
      • 2.6.1.4. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.6.1.5. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.2. Starch-based blends
      • 2.6.2.1. Overview
      • 2.6.2.2. Properties
      • 2.6.2.3. Applications in Packaging
      • 2.6.2.4. Advantages of Starch-Based Blends in Packaging
      • 2.6.2.5. Challenges and Limitations
      • 2.6.2.6. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.3. Cellulose
      • 2.6.3.1. Feedstocks
        • 2.6.3.1.1. Wood
        • 2.6.3.1.2. Plant
        • 2.6.3.1.3. Tunicate
        • 2.6.3.1.4. Algae
        • 2.6.3.1.5. Bacteria
      • 2.6.3.2. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)
        • 2.6.3.2.1. Properties
      • 2.6.3.3. Nanocellulose
        • 2.6.3.3.1. Cellulose nanocrystals
          • 2.6.3.3.1.1. Applications in packaging
        • 2.6.3.3.2. Cellulose nanofibers
          • 2.6.3.3.2.1. Applications in packaging
        • 2.6.3.3.3. Bacterial Nanocellulose (BNC)
          • 2.6.3.3.3.1. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.3.4. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.4. Protein-based bioplastics in packaging
      • 2.6.4.1. Feedstocks
      • 2.6.4.2. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.5. Lipids and waxes for packaging
      • 2.6.5.1. Overview
      • 2.6.5.2. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.6. Seaweed-based packaging
      • 2.6.6.1. Overview
      • 2.6.6.2. Production
      • 2.6.6.3. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.6.4. Producers
    • 2.6.7. Mycelium
      • 2.6.7.1. Overview
      • 2.6.7.2. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.7.3. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.8. Chitosan
      • 2.6.8.1. Overview
      • 2.6.8.2. Applications in packaging
      • 2.6.8.3. Commercial examples
    • 2.6.9. Bio-naphtha
      • 2.6.9.1. Overview
      • 2.6.9.2. Markets and applications
      • 2.6.9.3. Commercial examples

3. MARKETS AND APPLICATIONS

  • 3.1. Paper and board packaging
  • 3.2. Food packaging
    • 3.2.1. Bio-Based films and trays
    • 3.2.2. Bio-Based pouches and bags
    • 3.2.3. Bio-Based textiles and nets
    • 3.2.4. Bioadhesives
      • 3.2.4.1. Starch
      • 3.2.4.2. Cellulose
      • 3.2.4.3. Protein-Based
    • 3.2.5. Barrier coatings and films
      • 3.2.5.1. Polysaccharides
        • 3.2.5.1.1. Chitin
        • 3.2.5.1.2. Chitosan
        • 3.2.5.1.3. Starch
      • 3.2.5.2. Poly(lactic acid) (PLA)
      • 3.2.5.3. Poly(butylene Succinate)
      • 3.2.5.4. Functional Lipid and Proteins Based Coatings
    • 3.2.6. Active and Smart Food Packaging
      • 3.2.6.1. Active Materials and Packaging Systems
      • 3.2.6.2. Intelligent and Smart Food Packaging
    • 3.2.7. Antimicrobial films and agents
      • 3.2.7.1. Natural
      • 3.2.7.2. Inorganic nanoparticles
      • 3.2.7.3. Biopolymers
    • 3.2.8. Bio-based Inks and Dyes
    • 3.2.9. Edible films and coatings
      • 3.2.9.1. Overview
      • 3.2.9.2. Commercial examples
  • 3.3. Biobased films and coatings in packaging
    • 3.3.1. Overview
    • 3.3.2. Challenges using bio-based paints and coatings
    • 3.3.3. Types of bio-based coatings and films in packaging
      • 3.3.3.1. Polyurethane coatings
        • 3.3.3.1.1. Properties
        • 3.3.3.1.2. Bio-based polyurethane coatings
        • 3.3.3.1.3. Products
      • 3.3.3.2. Acrylate resins
        • 3.3.3.2.1. Properties
        • 3.3.3.2.2. Bio-based acrylates
        • 3.3.3.2.3. Products
      • 3.3.3.3. Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA)
        • 3.3.3.3.1. Properties
        • 3.3.3.3.2. Bio-PLA coatings and films
      • 3.3.3.4. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) coatings
      • 3.3.3.5. Cellulose coatings and films
        • 3.3.3.5.1. Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)
        • 3.3.3.5.2. Cellulose nanofibers
          • 3.3.3.5.2.1. Properties
          • 3.3.3.5.2.2. Product developers
      • 3.3.3.6. Lignin coatings
      • 3.3.3.7. Protein-based biomaterials for coatings
        • 3.3.3.7.1. Plant derived proteins
        • 3.3.3.7.2. Animal origin proteins
  • 3.4. Carbon capture derived materials for packaging
    • 3.4.1. Benefits of carbon utilization for plastics feedstocks
    • 3.4.2. CO2-derived polymers and plastics
    • 3.4.3. CO2 utilization products
  • 3.5. Flexible packaging
  • 3.6. Rigid packaging
  • 3.7. Coatings and films

4. COMPANY PROFILES (230 company profiles)

5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

6. REFERENCES

List of Tables

  • Table 1. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by biobased plastics type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 2. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 3. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by end-use market, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 4. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by region, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Table 5. Main Types of Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging Materials
  • Table 6. Average prices by bioplastic type, 2024 (US$ per kg)
  • Table 7. Average annual prices by bioplastic type, 2020-2023 (US$ per kg)
  • Table 8. Market trends in Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
  • Table 9. Market drivers for recent growth in the Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging market
  • Table 10. Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging
  • Table 11. Types of bio-based plastics and fossil-fuel-based plastics
  • Table 12. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers
  • Table 13. Processes for bioplastics in packaging
  • Table 14. LDPE film versus PLA, 2019-24 (USD/tonne)
  • Table 15. PLA properties for packaging applications
  • Table 16. Applications, advantages and disadvantages of PHAs in packaging
  • Table 17. Major polymers found in the extracellular covering of different algae
  • Table 18. Market overview for cellulose microfibers (microfibrillated cellulose) in paperboard and packaging-market age, key benefits, applications and producers
  • Table 19. Applications of nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC)
  • Table 20. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in packaging
  • Table 21. Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose in Packaging
  • Table 22. Types of protein based-bioplastics, applications and companies
  • Table 23. Overview of alginate-description, properties, application and market size
  • Table 24. Companies developing algal-based bioplastics
  • Table 25. Overview of mycelium fibers-description, properties, drawbacks and applications
  • Table 26. Overview of chitosan-description, properties, drawbacks and applications
  • Table 27. Commercial Examples of Chitosan-based Films and Coatings and Companies
  • Table 28. Bio-based naphtha markets and applications
  • Table 29. Bio-naphtha market value chain
  • Table 30. Commercial Examples of Bio-Naphtha Packaging and Companies
  • Table 31. Pros and cons of different type of food packaging materials
  • Table 32. Active Biodegradable Films films and their food applications
  • Table 33. Intelligent Biodegradable Films
  • Table 34. Edible films and coatings market summary
  • Table 35. Summary of barrier films and coatings for packaging
  • Table 36. Types of polyols
  • Table 37. Polyol producers
  • Table 38. Bio-based polyurethane coating products
  • Table 39. Bio-based acrylate resin products
  • Table 40. Polylactic acid (PLA) market analysis
  • Table 41. Commercially available PHAs
  • Table 42. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in paints and coatings
  • Table 43. Companies developing cellulose nanofibers products in paints and coatings
  • Table 44. Types of protein based-biomaterials, applications and companies
  • Table 45. CO2 utilization and removal pathways
  • Table 46. CO2 utilization products developed by chemical and plastic producers
  • Table 47. Comparison of bioplastics' (PLA and PHAs) properties to other common polymers used in product packaging
  • Table 48. Typical applications for bioplastics in flexible packaging
  • Table 49. Bioplastics for flexible packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Table 50. Typical applications for bioplastics in rigid packaging
  • Table 51. Bioplastics for rigid packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Table 52. Market revenues for bio-based coatings in packaging, 2018-2035 (billions USD), high estimate
  • Table 53. Lactips plastic pellets
  • Table 54. Oji Holdings CNF products

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Global packaging market by material type
  • Figure 2. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by biobased plastics type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 3. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 4. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by end-use market, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 5. Global biodegradable and compostable packaging by region, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes)
  • Figure 6. Routes for synthesizing polymers from fossil-based and bio-based resources
  • Figure 7. Organization and morphology of cellulose synthesizing terminal complexes (TCs) in different organisms
  • Figure 8. Biosynthesis of (a) wood cellulose (b) tunicate cellulose and (c) BC
  • Figure 9. Cellulose microfibrils and nanofibrils
  • Figure 10. TEM image of cellulose nanocrystals
  • Figure 11. CNC slurry
  • Figure 12. CNF gel
  • Figure 13. Bacterial nanocellulose shapes
  • Figure 14. BLOOM masterbatch from Algix
  • Figure 15. Typical structure of mycelium-based foam
  • Figure 16. Types of bio-based materials used for antimicrobial food packaging application
  • Figure 17. Water soluble packaging by Notpla
  • Figure 18. Examples of edible films in food packaging
  • Figure 19. Schematic of gas barrier properties of nanoclay film
  • Figure 20. Hefcel-coated wood (left) and untreated wood (right) after 30 seconds flame test
  • Figure 21. Applications for CO2
  • Figure 22. Life cycle of CO2-derived products and services
  • Figure 23. Conversion pathways for CO2-derived polymeric materials
  • Figure 24. Bioplastics for flexible packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Figure 25. Bioplastics for rigid packaging by bioplastic material type, 2019-2035 ('000 tonnes)
  • Figure 26. Market revenues for bio-based coatings in packaging, 2018-2035 (billions USD), conservative estimate
  • Figure 27. Pluumo
  • Figure 28. Anpoly cellulose nanofiber hydrogel
  • Figure 29. MEDICELLU(TM)
  • Figure 30. Asahi Kasei CNF fabric sheet
  • Figure 31. Properties of Asahi Kasei cellulose nanofiber nonwoven fabric
  • Figure 32. CNF nonwoven fabric
  • Figure 33. Passionfruit wrapped in Xgo Circular packaging
  • Figure 34. BIOLO e-commerce mailer bag made from PHA
  • Figure 35. Reusable and recyclable foodservice cups, lids, and straws from Joinease Hong Kong Ltd., made with plant-based NuPlastiQ BioPolymer from BioLogiQ, Inc
  • Figure 36. Fiber-based screw cap
  • Figure 37. SEELCAP ONEGO
  • Figure 38. CJ CheilJedang's biodegradable PHA-based wrapper for shipping products
  • Figure 39. CuanSave film
  • Figure 40. ELLEX products
  • Figure 41. CNF-reinforced PP compounds
  • Figure 42. Kirekira! toilet wipes
  • Figure 43. Edible packaging from Dissolves
  • Figure 44. Rheocrysta spray
  • Figure 45. DKS CNF products
  • Figure 46. Evoware edible seaweed-based packaging
  • Figure 47. Photograph (a) and micrograph (b) of mineral/ MFC composite showing the high viscosity and fibrillar structure
  • Figure 48. Forest and Whale container
  • Figure 49. PHA production process
  • Figure 50. Soy Silvestre's wheatgrass shots
  • Figure 51. AVAPTM process
  • Figure 52. GreenPower+(TM) process
  • Figure 53. Cutlery samples (spoon, knife, fork) made of nano cellulose and biodegradable plastic composite materials
  • Figure 54. CNF gel
  • Figure 55. Block nanocellulose material
  • Figure 56. CNF products developed by Hokuetsu
  • Figure 57. Unilever Carte D'Or ice cream packaging
  • Figure 58. Kami Shoji CNF products
  • Figure 59. IPA synthesis method
  • Figure 60. Compostable water pod
  • Figure 61. XCNF
  • Figure 62: Innventia AB movable nanocellulose demo plant
  • Figure 63. Shellworks packaging containers
  • Figure 64. Thales packaging incorporating Fibrease
  • Figure 65. Sulapac cosmetics containers
  • Figure 66. Sulzer equipment for PLA polymerization processing
  • Figure 67. Silver / CNF composite dispersions
  • Figure 68. CNF/nanosilver powder
  • Figure 69. Corbion FDCA production process
  • Figure 70. UPM biorefinery process
  • Figure 71. Vegea production process
  • Figure 72. Worn Again products
  • Figure 73. S-CNF in powder form