![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1857171
全球蛋白质和胜肽类药物治疗市场成长机会:2030 年预测Growth Opportunities in Global Protein and Peptide Therapeutics, Forecast to 2030 |
||||||
跨治疗领域的拓展将推动变革性成长,而新的剂型和更聪明的给药方式将起到关键作用。
蛋白质和胜肽类药物产业正经历一场重大变革时期,其驱动力来自新一代生技药品,例如多特异性抗体、抗体药物复合体(ADC)和GLP-1疗法。这些进步加剧了市场竞争,同时,重磅抗体专利到期加速了生物相似药的上市,并促使现有企业采取生活方式管理策略。
新型单株抗体(mAbs)定义了针对自体免疫、感染疾病和心血管疾病的药物开发趋势,具有延长半衰期的融合蛋白、酵素替代疗法创新、细胞激素工程等。缓释性和患者友善製剂提高了成本效益、依从性和可及性,而基于平台的胜肽方法则专注于具有更高受体选择性和持久性的多功能药物。
蛋白质和胜肽类疗法正逐渐成为精准标靶和生理有效的治疗选择,以应对日益增长的全球疾病负担,尤其是在肿瘤、代谢和自体免疫疾病领域。其中,GLP-1 和多重促效剂胜肽类药物在全球肥胖症流行的推动下经历了快速增长。
市场动态,包括价格快速下降、生物类似药的扩张以及治疗偏好转向 GLP-1 受体促效剂,导致自 2024 年以来,Humalog(Humalog)、来得时(Lantus)、巴沙格(Basaglar)和特雷西巴(Tresiba)等传统胰岛素的销量下降。这些药物现在不仅可以治疗糖尿病,还可以治疗肥胖、睡眠呼吸中止症和心血管风险。
这项研究服务涵盖北美、欧洲、亚太、拉丁美洲以及中东和北非(MENA)地区,并提供蛋白质和胜肽治疗市场未来六年(2025-2030年)的全球收入预测,涵盖单株抗体、融合蛋白、GLP-1类似物、肽激素、凝血因子、细胞激素、细胞激素白细胞介素和治疗性酵素等细分领域。该服务深入分析了区域市场趋势、技术进步和临床路径,重点关注肿瘤学、内分泌学、感染疾病和免疫学领域的重磅药物、生物相似药和新兴治疗方法。
策略洞察重点在于市场进入、成长机会、合作模式以及创新热点,例如口服胜肽递送、靶向蛋白质降解和多功能生技药品。
收入和预测
2024 年基准年预计营收为 4,227.1 亿美元,2024-2030 年研究期间的复合年增长率为 9.1%。
三大策略挑战对蛋白质和胜肽类治疗产业的影响
地缘政治动盪
原因
随着美国政府考虑对进口药品课税,製药公司正在调整生产和供应链策略。 《生物安全法案》(BIOSECURE Act)一旦通过,将限制联邦政府使用与外国敌对国家(尤其是中国)相关的生物技术产品。
地缘政治紧张局势加剧,导致西方製药公司寻求中国供应商的替代方案,例如Astra Zeneca和Amicus Therapeutics等公司已转向印度、欧洲和美国的供应商。
弗罗斯特的观点
某些糖蛋白、免疫球蛋白和单株抗体通常需要复杂的生产工艺,且容易受到供应链中断的影响。为了确保稳定的供应,相关人员在投资建造本地和区域性的生产工厂。
肽类激素和酵素的生产严重依赖从中国采购原材料和耗材,因此供应商多元化对于降低地缘政治紧张局势的风险至关重要。例如,葛兰素史克(GSK)已在美国投入大量资金建设生产设施。
颠覆性技术
原因
人工智慧正在革新蛋白质和胜肽类药物的发现和开发,加速药物候选物的识别和优化。例如,Generate Biomedicines公司已与诺华製药达成合作,一项价值可能超过10亿美元的交易将利用其GenAI平台开发蛋白质疗法。
递送技术的进步提高了蛋白质和胜肽类药物的生物有效性,从而提高了患者的依从性。
该行业也正在采用更环保的生产技术,以减少对环境的影响并提高效率。
弗罗斯特的观点
模组化平台与人工智慧/机器学习的结合加速了抗体的发现、人源化和优化。例如,Esai 和 Absci 正在利用人工智慧设计具有特定可开发特性的抗体。
奈米颗粒和脂质体可提高胜肽的稳定性和标靶分布,减少传统给药途径带来的副作用。
变革性的技术进步使得以需求主导的研究成为可能,从而提高了患者的舒适度和便利性。
旨在提高早期疗效和应用现成胜肽疗法的研究,很可能在改变治疗定价模式方面发挥关键作用。
竞争加剧
原因
受快速的技术发展、生物相似药参与企业以及老牌製药公司和新兴生物技术公司战略倡议的推动,市场竞争异常激烈。 Keytruda、 Opdivo和Soliris等重磅抗体药物的专利即将到期。
下一代设计,如多特异性抗体、抗体药物复合体(ADC)、口服 GLP-1(例如辉瑞的 danugliplon、诺和诺德的 Ryvelsus)以及基于 GLP-1 的双/三肽促效剂(GLP-1/葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽[GIP]/升糖素受体 [GCGR]组合药物),预计将进一步加剧竞争。
弗罗斯特的观点
在应对生物相似药带来的挑战的同时,各公司需要投资研发,以开发和区分自己的产品。
安进和山德士生物製品等公司正积极研发程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1 (PD-1) 和 IL-6 的生物相似药。
推出延长半衰期 (EHL) 的皮下 (SC) 版本的第二代物质对于确保其新鲜度至关重要。
儘早与 FDA 接洽、即时生物标记和改进设计将加速进展。
分割
市场定义
竞争环境
竞争对手数量
竞争因素
主要终端用户产业
主要竞争对手
前十家公司销售额份额(2024 年)
其他值得关注的竞争对手
流通结构
值得关注的收购与合併
主要竞争对手
大型生物製药公司
新兴生物製药
签约服务供应商
基于技术的解决方案
数位疗法 (DTx)
成长驱动因素
成长抑制因素
Cross-Therapeutic Expansion is Driving Transformational Growth Fueled by Novel Formats and Smarter Delivery
The protein and peptide therapeutics industry is undergoing a profound transformation, driven by next-generation biologics, including multi-specific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and GLP-1 treatments. These advances are intensifying competition, while the patent expiries of blockbuster antibodies are accelerating the entry of biosimilars and prompting lifestyle management strategies by incumbents.
New monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) define drug development trends, targeting autoimmune, infectious, and cardiovascular disorders; fusion proteins with extended half-lives; innovations in enzyme replacement therapies; and cytokine engineering. Extended-release and patient-friendly formulations are improving cost efficiency, adherence, and access, while platform-based peptide methods emphasize multifunctional medicines with higher receptor selectivity and durability.
Protein and peptide therapies are becoming central to precision-targeted, physiologically potent treatment options as the global disease burden rises-particularly in oncology, metabolic disorders, and autoimmune conditions. Among the fastest-growing classes are GLP-1s and multi-agonist peptides, propelled by the global obesity epidemic.
Market dynamics-including steep price cuts, biosimilar expansion, and shifting treatment preferences toward GLP-1 receptor agonists-are driving a sales decline in traditional insulin products such as NovoRapid (NovoLog), Humalog, Lantus, Basaglar, and Tresiba beyond 2024. These drugs now treat not only diabetes but also obesity, sleep apnea, and cardiovascular risk.
This research service covers North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East & North Africa (MENA), providing a 6-year global revenue forecast (2025-2030) for the protein and peptide therapeutics market across segments including mAbs, fusion proteins, GLP-1 analogs, peptide hormones, coagulation factors, cytokines, interleukins, and therapeutic enzymes. It offers detailed insights into regional market trends, technological advancements, and clinical pathways, with emphasis on blockbuster drugs, biosimilars, and emerging modalities across oncology, endocrinology, infectious diseases, and immunology.
Strategic insights highlight market access, growth opportunities, collaboration models, and innovation hotspots such as oral peptide delivery, targeted protein degradation, and multifunctional biologics.
Revenue Forecast
The revenue estimate for the base year 2024 is $422.71 billion, with a CAGR of 9.1% for the study period from 2024 to 2030.
The Impact of the Top 3 Strategic Imperatives on the Protein and Peptide Therapeutics Industry
Geopolitical Chaos
Why
Pharmaceutical firms are altering their production and supply chain policies as the US government considers taxing pharmaceutical imports. If passed, the BIOSECURE Act will restrict federal use of biotech products tied to foreign adversaries, particularly China.
Rising geopolitical tensions are driving Western pharmaceutical firms to replace Chinese suppliers. For example, AstraZeneca and Amicus Therapeutics are shifting to suppliers in India, Europe, and the United States.
Frost Perspective
Certain glycoproteins, immunoglobulins, and mAbs often require complex production procedures and face supply chain interruptions. To ensure steady supply, stakeholders are investing in local and regional manufacturing plants.
Manufacturing peptide-derived hormones and enzymes largely depends on raw ingredients and materials sourced from China, making supplier diversification critical to reduce risks from geopolitical tensions. For instance, GSK is investing heavily in domestic manufacturing within the United States.
Disruptive Technologies
Why
AI is revolutionizing the discovery and development of protein and peptide medicines by accelerating drug candidate identification and optimization. For example, Generate Biomedicines partnered with Novartis in a deal potentially worth over $1 billion to develop protein therapeutics using its GenAI platform.
Advances in delivery technologies are improving the bioavailability of protein and peptide therapies and boosting patient compliance.
The sector is also adopting greener manufacturing techniques to reduce environmental impact and increase efficiency.
Frost Perspective
Combining modular platforms with AI/ML accelerates antibody discovery, humanization, and optimization. For example, Esai and Absci use AI to design antibodies with specific developability characteristics.
Nanoparticles and liposomes improve peptide stability and targeted distribution, reducing adverse effects associated with traditional routes.
Advances in transformational technologies enable need-driven research that enhances patient comfort and convenience.
Research on improving early-stage effectiveness and administrating readily available peptide therapies will play a crucial role in transforming therapy pricing models.
Competitive Intensity
Why
The market shows intense competition, fueled by rapid technology developments, a surge in biosimilar entrants, and strategic moves by both established pharmaceutical corporations and emerging biotech firms. Major blockbuster antibodies such as Keytruda, Opdivo, and Soliris are nearing patent cliffs.
Next-generation designs-including multispecifics, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), oral GLP-1s (e.g., Pfizer's danuglipron, Novo's Rybelsus), and GLP-1-based dual/tripeptide agonists (GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide [GIP]/glucagon receptor [GCGR] combinations)-will intensify competition further.
Frost Perspective
While addressing the challenges posed by biosimilars, companies must invest in R&D to develop and differentiate their products.
Firms such as Amgen and Sandoz Biologics are actively pursuing programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and IL-6 biosimilars.
Launching extended half-life (EHL), subcutaneous (SC) versions of second-generation substances is critical to secure freshness.
Early FDA engagement, real-time biomarkers, and enhanced design will accelerate progress.
Segmentation
Market Definition
Competitive Environment
Number of Competitors
Competitive Factors
Key End-User Industry Verticals
Leading Competitors
Revenue Share of Top 10 Competitors (2024)
Other Notable Competitors
Distribution Structure
Notable Acquisitions and Mergers
Key Competitors
Big Biopharma
Emerging Biopharma
Contract Service Provider
Tech-Based solutions
Digital Therapeutics (DTx)
Growth Drivers
Growth Restraints