石油和天然气行业采用的减排策略：分析当前排放量（按石油和天然气行业、按公司）、未来目标、减排策略、碳定价

在审查石油和天然气行业的 28 家领先公司宣布的目标时，我们发现几乎所有公司都针对直接、范围 1 和 2 排放制定了一些目标。相比之下，不到一半的公司为其范围 3 排放设定了某种目标，不到三分之一的公司的目标是到 2050 年实现总排放量净为零。

本报告调查分析了全球油气行业采取的减排策略，分析了 2019 年全球油气行业的二氧化碳排放量以及全球油气剩余储量。未来CO2排放量、九大油气企业减排目标及战略、全球减排战略等。

内容

内容

• 执行摘要
• 工业排放概览
• 石油和天然气行业的排放量是多少？
• 油气价值链中的排放源
• 排放类别定义
• 基准企业目标
• 出院地点在哪里？
• 气体排放明细
• 战略和碳定价
• 甲烷排放机会
• 常见的减排策略
• 国家计划
• 全球碳定价
• 内部碳定价
• 公司分析
• 选定油气行业的主要排放目标
• 排放目标评估
• ExxonMobil
• BP
• ConocoPhillips
• Chevron
• Eni
• Equinor
• Repsol
• Shell
• TotalEnergies
• 结论

A review of announced targets from 28 major oil and gas companies showed that nearly all have some kind of target for direct, scope 1 & 2 emissions. Meanwhile, less than half have any kind of target covering scope 3 emissions and less than a third aim to be net zero across all emission types by 2050. The nine most active O&G companies in the energy transition have reported reductions in absolute emissions and emissions intensity in recent years. On the national level, carbon pricing is used in Europe and Canada, but in the US only certain states are covered, and the Middle East and Russia have no such schemes. Companies have started implementing internal carbon pricing schemes in regions where it is less commonplace.

The oil and gas sector is responsible for about 50% of energy-related emissions, with the vast majority arising from Scope 3 emissions. Of Scope 1 and 2 emissions, the largest proportion comes from upstream and downstream operations. Emissions reduction strategies of the 9 most active oil and gas companies were compiled and analysed. Aside from developing low carbon technologies, companies have also started to endorse carbon pricing as an effective emissions reduction measure.

Scope

• Global oil and gas sector CO2 emissions in 2019
• Future CO2 emissions from global oil and gas remaining lifetime of reserves
• Emissions reduction targets and strategies of 9 selected oil and gas majors
• Global emissions reduction strategies

Reasons to Buy

• Obtain the most up to date information on emissions reduction strategies in major oil and gas producing nations and companies
• Understand the origins of different emissions throughout the oil and gas value chain
• Assess your competitor's emissions reduction strategies and develop the most effective plan of action based on the trends in their absolute emissions and emissions intensities
• Develop an understanding of the global carbon pricing scene

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

• Executive Summary
• Sector Emissions Overview
• How much does the sector emit?
• Emissions sources across the O&G value chain
• Defining Emissions Categories
• Benchmarking Company Targets
• Where are emissions taking place?
• Emissions breakdown by gas
• Strategies and Carbon Pricing
• The methane emissions opportunity
• Common emissions reduction strategies
• National plans
• Carbon pricing worldwide
• Internal carbon pricing
• Company Analysis
• Main emissions targets among selected O&G majors
• Evaluating emissions targets
• ExxonMobil

BP

• ConocoPhillips
• Chevron
• Eni
• Equinor
• Repsol
• Shell
• TotalEnergies
• Conclusions

List of Tables

List of Tables

• Table 1: Emissions reduction policies by country
• Table 2: Emissions targets of 9 selected oil and gas majors

List of Figures

List of Figures

• Figure 1: Energy-related GHG Emissions(%), 2021
• Figure 2: US O&G Emissions by Segment(%), 2020
• Figure 3: Oil and gas value chain
• Figure 4: Emissions categories
• Figure 5: Average emissions by scope of 16 top oil and gas companies(%)
• Figure 6: Targets of top 28 oil and gas companies, 2022
• Figure 7: Global Oil and Gas Sector CO2 Emissions(Gt CO2), 2019
• Figure 8: Future CO2 emissions from global O&G remaining lifetime of reserves(Gt CO2)
• Figure 9: Net Methane Abatement Cost by Technology($/MMBtu)
• Figure 10: Emission reduction strategies by sector
• Figure 11: Map of carbon pricing schemes worldwide
• Figure 12: Internal Carbon Prices Among Oil & Gas Majors($/ton)
• Figure 13: ExxonMobil's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Upstream Emission Intensity(t-CO2e/100 tons production), 2016-2020
• Figure 14: BP's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Emission Intensity(g-CO2e/MJ), 2017-2021
• Figure 15: ConocoPhillips' Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Emission Intensity(kg-CO2e/boe), 2016-2020
• Figure 16: Chevron's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Upstream Emission Intensity(kg-CO2e/boe), 2017-2021
• Figure 17: Eni's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Carbon Intensity(t-CO2e/kboe), 2016-2020
• Figure 18: Equinor's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Upstream Carbon Intensity(kg-CO2e/boe), 2016-2021
• Figure 19: Repsol's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Upstream Emission Intensity(t-CO2e/kboe), 2016-2021
• Figure 20: Shell's Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Net Carbon Intensity(g-CO2e/MJ)), 2017-2021
• Figure 21: TotalEnergies' Absolute Scope 1 Emissions(Mt-CO2e) and Upstream Emission Intensity(kg-CO2e/boe), 2015-2020