反简易爆炸装置市场机会、成长动力、产业趋势分析及 2025 - 2034 年预测

2024年，全球反简易爆炸装置市场规模达23.5亿美元，预计2034年将以3.8%的复合年增长率成长，达到33.9亿美元。这主要得益于非对称战争日益频繁，叛乱团体和非国家行为者纷纷使用简易爆炸装置（IED）等非常规战术。各国政府和军队正增加对反简易爆炸装置解决方案的投资，以应对这些新兴威胁。这些系统在受政治不稳定、恐怖主义和内部衝突影响的地区尤其重要。衝突地区对增强安全和防御能力的需求日益增长，也促进了市场扩张。

然而，上届美国政府实施的贸易政策和关税对市场产生了重大影响。原材料（尤其是电子元件）成本的上涨给供应链带来了巨大压力，并对製造商的财务稳定性产生了负面影响。为了应对这些挑战，企业正在转向在地化的生产和需求模式，以确保在政治和经济不确定性面前保持韧性。这种策略方针有助于在动盪的全球环境中保障投资并保持成本效益。人工智慧 (AI)、无人地面车辆 (UGV)、无人机和先进感测器等尖端技术的发展，正在提高反简易爆炸装置系统的有效性和可靠性。

预计到2034年，无人系统市场规模将达15亿美元。衝突地区人员风险最小化的需求日益增长，这是反简易爆炸装置市场采用无人系统的关键驱动力。无人地面车辆（UGV）和无人飞行器（UAV）能够远端探测、检查和拆除简易爆炸装置，为爆炸物处理小组提供了更安全的替代方案，从而保护了人员生命安全。自主技术、感测器整合和即时资料处理的进步显着提升了它们的性能，国防机构也加大了对这些系统的投资。

预计到2034年，反简易爆炸装置市场中的车载部分将以3.1%的复合年增长率增长，这得益于全球装甲车辆投资的激增，以及反简易爆炸装置系统在陆、空、海等多种平台之间的日益整合。无人水下航行器（UUV）配备了尖端感测器和机械手臂，可以探测和摧毁爆炸装置，在国防行动中特别流行。这些航行器透过提供更安全、更有效率的水下威胁处理方式，增强了军事人员的安全。

2024年，美国反简易爆炸装置市场规模达3.793亿美元。美国雄厚的国防预算和持续的全球军事行动，使其占据了市场领先地位。美国国防部（DoD）持续大力投资先进的侦测和中和技术，包括干扰器和探地雷达。加强军队防护并确保在敌对环境下的作战效能，仍然是美国在全球反简易爆炸装置市场保持主导地位的关键因素。

各公司为巩固其在全球反简易爆炸装置 (IED) 市场的地位而采取的关键策略包括大力投资研发，以增强无人系统、人工智慧和感测器技术的能力。 BAE 系统公司和诺斯罗普·格鲁曼公司等公司正在透过开发整合自主操作和即时资料处理的先进反简易爆炸装置系统来扩展其产品组合。此外，莱昂纳多公司和洛克希德·马丁公司等公司正在与世界各地的国防机构建立战略合作伙伴关係，以扩大其市场覆盖范围并增强产品供应。这些公司致力于透过专注于创新和开发满足多样化营运需求的可扩展解决方案来保持竞争优势。

目录

第一章：方法论与范围

第二章：执行摘要

第三章：行业洞察

• 产业生态系统分析
• 川普政府关税分析
  • 对贸易的影响
    • 贸易量中断
    • 报復措施
  • 对产业的影响
    • 供应方影响（原料）
      • 主要材料价格波动
      • 供应链重组
      • 生产成本影响
    • 需求面影响（售价）
      • 价格传导至终端市场
      • 市占率动态
      • 消费者反应模式
  • 受影响的主要公司
  • 策略产业反应
    • 供应链重组
    • 定价和产品策略
    • 政策参与
  • 展望与未来考虑
• 产业衝击力
  • 成长动力
    • 全球国防预算增加
    • 先进人工智慧、机器人、无人系统和感测器技术的集成
    • 部队保护解决方案需求不断成长
    • 扩大高风险地区的军事行动
    • 政府对反简易爆炸装置基础建设的投资
  • 产业陷阱与挑战
    • 开发和采购成本高
    • 即时检测和中和的技术限制
• 成长潜力分析
• 监管格局
• 技术格局
• 未来市场趋势
• 差距分析
• 波特的分析
• PESTEL分析

第四章：竞争格局

• 介绍
• 公司市占率分析
• 主要市场参与者的竞争分析
• 竞争定位矩阵
• 策略仪表板

第五章：市场估计与预测：按部署，2021 - 2034 年

• 主要趋势
• 车载
• 船载
• 手持式
• 其他的

第六章：市场估计与预测：按系统，2021 - 2034 年

• 主要趋势
• 无人系统
• 反简易爆炸装置车辆
• 电子对抗措施
• 其他的

第七章：市场估计与预测：依最终用途，2021 - 2034 年

• 主要趋势
• 军队
• 国土安全

第八章：市场估计与预测：按地区，2021 - 2034 年

• 主要趋势
• 北美洲
  • 我们
  • 加拿大
• 欧洲
  • 德国
  • 英国
  • 法国
  • 西班牙
  • 义大利
  • 荷兰
• 亚太地区
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国
• 拉丁美洲
  • 巴西
  • 墨西哥
  • 阿根廷
• 中东和非洲
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 南非
  • 阿联酋

第九章：公司简介

• BAE Systems plc
• DRS Technologies, Inc.
• Elbit Systems Ltd.
• Harris Corporation
• Honeywell International Inc.
• L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
• Leonardo SpA
• Lockheed Martin Corporation
• Northrop Grumman Corporation
• QinetiQ Group plc
• Rheinmetall AG
• Rolls-Royce Group plc
• Saab AB
• Textron Inc.
• Thales Group

The Global Counter IED Market was valued at USD 2.35 billion in 2024 and is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 3.8% to reach USD 3.39 billion by 2034, driven by the increasing frequency of asymmetric warfare, where insurgent groups and non-state actors employ unconventional tactics such as improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Governments and military forces are increasingly investing in counter-IED solutions to address these emerging threats. These systems are particularly crucial in regions affected by political instability, terrorism, and internal conflict. The rising need for enhanced security and defense capabilities in conflict zones is also contributing to the market's expansion.

However, trade policies and tariffs implemented during the previous U.S. administration have significantly impacted the market. The rising costs of raw materials, particularly electronic components, have placed considerable strain on the supply chain, negatively affecting the financial stability of manufacturers. To mitigate these challenges, companies are shifting toward localized production and demand models, ensuring resilience in the face of political and economic uncertainties. This strategic approach helps to safeguard investments and maintain cost-efficiency in a volatile global landscape. The development of cutting-edge technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), drones, and advanced sensors, is improving the effectiveness and reliability of counter-IED systems.

The unmanned systems market is expected to reach USD 1.5 billion by 2034. The growing need to minimize the risk to personnel in conflict zones is a key driver for the adoption of unmanned systems in the counter-IED market. Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) provide a safer alternative for explosive ordnance disposal teams by enabling remote detection, inspection, and neutralization of IEDs, thereby protecting human lives. Advancements in autonomous technology, sensor integration, and real-time data processing have significantly improved their performance, with defense agencies increasing their investments in these systems.

The vehicle-mounted segment in the Counter-IED market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3.1% through 2034, driven by a surge in global investments in armored vehicles, as well as the increasing integration of counter-IED systems across diverse platforms, including land, air, and sea. Unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs), which are equipped with cutting-edge sensors and robotic arms to detect and neutralize explosive devices, are becoming particularly popular in defense operations. These vehicles enhance the safety of military personnel by providing a safer, more efficient way to handle underwater threats.

U.S. Counter-IED Market was valued at USD 379.3 million in 2024. The country's substantial defense budget and ongoing military operations worldwide drive its market leadership. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) continues to make significant investments in advanced detection and neutralization technologies, including jammers and ground-penetrating radar. The focus on enhancing military force protection and ensuring operational effectiveness in hostile environments remains a key factor sustaining the U.S. dominance in the global counter-IED market.

Key strategies adopted by companies to strengthen their position in the Global Counter-IED market include investing heavily in R&D to enhance the capabilities of unmanned systems, AI, and sensor technologies. Companies such as BAE Systems and Northrop Grumman are expanding their portfolios by developing advanced counter-IED systems that incorporate autonomous operations and real-time data processing. Additionally, players like Leonardo S.p.A. and Lockheed Martin are pursuing strategic partnerships and collaborations with defense agencies worldwide to increase their market reach and strengthen product offerings. By focusing on innovation and developing scalable solutions that meet diverse operational requirements, these companies aim to maintain a competitive edge.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Methodology and Scope

• 1.1 Market scope and definitions
• 1.2 Research design
  • 1.2.1 Research approach
  • 1.2.2 Data collection methods
• 1.3 Base estimates and calculations
  • 1.3.1 Base year calculation
  • 1.3.2 Key trends for market estimation
• 1.4 Forecast model
• 1.5 Primary research and validation
  • 1.5.1 Primary sources
  • 1.5.2 Data mining sources

Chapter 2 Executive Summary

• 2.1 Industry 360⁰ synopsis

Chapter 3 Industry Insights

• 3.1 Industry ecosystem analysis
• 3.2 Trump administration tariffs analysis
  • 3.2.1 Impact on trade
    • 3.2.1.1 Trade volume disruptions
    • 3.2.1.2 Retaliatory measures
  • 3.2.2 Impact on the industry
    • 3.2.2.1 Supply-side impact (raw materials)
      • 3.2.2.1.1 Price volatility in key materials
      • 3.2.2.1.2 Supply chain restructuring
      • 3.2.2.1.3 Production cost implications
    • 3.2.2.2 Demand-side impact (selling price)
      • 3.2.2.2.1 Price transmission to end markets
      • 3.2.2.2.2 Market share dynamics
      • 3.2.2.2.3 Consumer response patterns
  • 3.2.3 Key companies impacted
  • 3.2.4 Strategic industry responses
    • 3.2.4.1 Supply chain reconfiguration
    • 3.2.4.2 Pricing and product strategies
    • 3.2.4.3 Policy engagement
  • 3.2.5 Outlook and future considerations
• 3.3 Industry impact forces
  • 3.3.1 Growth drivers
    • 3.3.1.1 Increasing defense budgets globally
    • 3.3.1.2 Integration of advanced AI, robotics, unmanned systems, and sensor technologies
    • 3.3.1.3 Rising demand for force protection solutions
    • 3.3.1.4 Expanding military operations in high-risk regions
    • 3.3.1.5 Government investments in counter-IED infrastructure
  • 3.3.2 Industry pitfalls and challenges
    • 3.3.2.1 High development and procurement costs
    • 3.3.2.2 Technological limitations in real-time detection and neutralization
• 3.4 Growth potential analysis
• 3.5 Regulatory landscape
• 3.6 Technology landscape
• 3.7 Future market trends
• 3.8 Gap analysis
• 3.9 Porter's analysis
• 3.10 PESTEL analysis

Chapter 4 Competitive Landscape, 2024

• 4.1 Introduction
• 4.2 Company market share analysis
• 4.3 Competitive analysis of major market players
• 4.4 Competitive positioning matrix
• 4.5 Strategy dashboard

Chapter 5 Market Estimates and Forecast, By Deployment, 2021 - 2034 (USD Million)

• 5.1 Key trends
• 5.2 Vehicle mounted
• 5.3 Ship mounted
• 5.4 Hand-held
• 5.5 Others

Chapter 6 Market Estimates and Forecast, By System, 2021 - 2034 (USD Million)

• 6.1 Key trends
• 6.2 Unmanned systems
• 6.3 Counter-IED vehicles
• 6.4 Electronic counter measures
• 6.5 Others

Chapter 7 Market Estimates and Forecast, By End Use, 2021 - 2034 (USD Million)

• 7.1 Key trends
• 7.2 Military
• 7.3 Homeland security

Chapter 8 Market Estimates and Forecast, By Region, 2021 - 2034 (USD Million)

• 8.1 Key trends
• 8.2 North America
  • 8.2.1 U.S.
  • 8.2.2 Canada
• 8.3 Europe
  • 8.3.1 Germany
  • 8.3.2 UK
  • 8.3.3 France
  • 8.3.4 Spain
  • 8.3.5 Italy
  • 8.3.6 Netherlands
• 8.4 Asia Pacific
  • 8.4.1 China
  • 8.4.2 India
  • 8.4.3 Japan
  • 8.4.4 Australia
  • 8.4.5 South Korea
• 8.5 Latin America
  • 8.5.1 Brazil
  • 8.5.2 Mexico
  • 8.5.3 Argentina
• 8.6 Middle East and Africa
  • 8.6.1 Saudi Arabia
  • 8.6.2 South Africa
  • 8.6.3 UAE

Chapter 9 Company Profiles

• 9.1 BAE Systems plc
• 9.2 DRS Technologies, Inc.
• 9.3 Elbit Systems Ltd.
• 9.4 Harris Corporation
• 9.5 Honeywell International Inc.
• 9.6 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
• 9.7 Leonardo S.p.A.
• 9.8 Lockheed Martin Corporation
• 9.9 Northrop Grumman Corporation
• 9.10 QinetiQ Group plc
• 9.11 Rheinmetall AG
• 9.12 Rolls-Royce Group plc
• 9.13 Saab AB
• 9.14 Textron Inc.
• 9.15 Thales Group