爆炸物处理 (EOD) 机器人市场机会、成长动力、产业趋势分析及 2025 - 2034 年预测

2024年，全球爆炸物处理机器人市场规模达18亿美元，预计2034年将以15.1%的复合年增长率成长，达到73亿美元。此类系统需求的激增，很大程度上源自于全球安全威胁日益频繁以及各国政府国防投资的不断增加。随着威胁日益复杂，各国正优先开发和部署无人技术，以消除潜在危险，同时降低对人类生命的威胁。

将机器人技术融入爆炸物处理任务已不再是小众技能，而是现代武装部队和安全机构的关键资产。这些机器人日益被视为在不可预测的情况下应对爆炸危险的一线解决方案，使其成为战场和民用行动中不可或缺的一部分。它们的部署不仅增强了态势感知和决策能力，还能大幅降低作战成本和人员风险。因此，随着军队适应非对称威胁，执法部门寻求在城市环境中使用可靠的工具，机器人平台的采购量持续成长。

市面上的排爆机器人依类型分为遥控型和自主/半自主型。 2024年，遥控机器人以11.4亿美元的估值领先市场。其受欢迎程度源自于其可靠性和价格实惠，这使得包括战术部队和安全机构在内的广泛用户都能使用。在即时判断至关重要的场景中，手动控制仍然必不可少，操作员更喜欢能够立即响应人类指令的系统。这些平台也相对易于操作，所需的监管许可较少，并且在需要适应性和即时监控的部署中广受欢迎。

就最终用途而言，国防和军事领域是主要贡献者，占2024年全球市场份额的59%。这一主导地位源自于该领域高度依赖机器人系统执行简易爆炸装置（IED）拆除、战术侦察以及敌对环境下的后勤支援等任务。全球武装部队正优先将机器人技术融入其国防战略，以最大限度地减少士兵暴露风险并提高任务成功率。持续的部队现代化投资，以及与指挥、控制、通讯、电脑、情报、监视和侦察（C4ISR）网路的更紧密结合，进一步巩固了该领域的领先地位。

按作战范围细分，短程排爆机器人占据市场主导地位，2024 年其价值达 8.217 亿美元。这类机器人因其机动性强、适合快速反应部署，广泛应用于城市任务、受限空间和民用作业。其紧凑的设计和高机动性使其成为执法部门、急救人员和拆弹小组的理想选择，这些部门需要有效的工具来应对局部威胁。随着人口稠密地区的安全挑战日益严峻，预计在整个预测期内，对此类系统的需求将保持强劲。

移动性是另一个关键的细分领域，机器人可分为履带式、轮式、腿部式和混合式。其中，履带式机器人在2024年占据了46.1%的市场。这些系统因其在不平坦或充满碎石的地形上卓越的牵引力和稳定性而备受推崇，这使得它们在战区和爆炸后环境中特别有用。其坚固的结构使其能够承载更重的有效载荷并在恶劣条件下运行，使其成为军事和战术行动的首选。

美国在全球市场占有重要份额，2024 年估值达 6.315 亿美元。美国在该领域的领先地位得益于其高额的国防开支、持续的海外部署以及对军事人员防护技术的战略重视。美国对先进 EOD 系统的强劲需求也受到政府支持研究和采购的倡议的推动，尤其是透过国防部和国土安全部等机构。人工智慧和自动化技术的进步进一步推动了下一代机器人解决方案在国家安全框架内的应用。

排爆机器人市场的竞争格局既有成熟的全球企业，也有敏捷的区域製造商。排名前四名的公司——L3Harris Technologies, Inc.、QinetiQ、iRobot Corporation 和 Peraton——在 2024 年的市占率总计达 41.4%。这些领先公司受益于长期的国防合约、广泛的分销网络以及持续的研发投入。与政府国防机构的紧密关係以及在无人系统领域的创新经验巩固了它们的主导地位。同时，新兴企业正在透过提供针对执法和民用安全领域利基应用的专业化、经济高效的解决方案来开拓市场。私人企业与公共国防组织的合作开发也正在加速产品创新，并重塑市场竞争格局。

目录

第一章：方法论与范围

第二章：执行摘要

第三章：行业洞察

• 产业生态系统分析
  • 供应商格局
  • 利润率
  • 成本结构
  • 每个阶段的增值
  • 影响价值链的因素
  • 中断
• 川普政府关税分析
  • 对贸易的影响
    • 贸易量中断
    • 报復措施
  • 对产业的影响
    • 供给侧影响
      • 价格波动
      • 供应链重组
      • 生产成本影响
    • 需求面影响
      • 价格传导至终端市场
      • 市占率动态
      • 消费者反应模式
  • 受影响的主要公司
  • 策略产业反应
    • 供应链重组
    • 定价和产品策略
    • 政策参与
  • 展望与未来考虑
• 产业衝击力
  • 成长动力
    • 全球国防开支不断增加
    • 恐怖主义和简易爆炸装置威胁事件不断增加
    • 采用自主和人工智慧驱动的技术
    • 扩大在民事执法和国土安全领域的应用
    • 民事安全应用日益增多
  • 产业陷阱与挑战
    • 购置及维护成本高
    • 技术复杂性和可靠性问题
  • 市场机会
• 成长潜力分析
• 监管格局
  • 北美洲
  • 欧洲
  • 亚太地区
  • 拉丁美洲
  • 中东和非洲
• 波特的分析
• PESTEL分析
• 技术和创新格局
  • 当前的技术趋势
  • 新兴技术
• 价格趋势
  • 按地区
  • 按产品
• 定价策略
• 新兴商业模式
• 合规性要求
• 消费者情绪分析
• 专利和智慧财产权分析
• 地缘政治与贸易动态

第四章：竞争格局

• 介绍
• 公司市占率分析
  • 按地区
    • 北美洲
    • 欧洲
    • 亚太地区
  • 市场集中度分析
• 关键参与者的竞争基准
  • 财务绩效比较
    • 收入
    • 利润率
    • 研发
  • 产品组合比较
    • 产品范围广度
    • 科技
    • 创新
  • 地理位置比较
    • 全球足迹分析
    • 服务网路覆盖
    • 各区域市场渗透率
  • 竞争定位矩阵
    • 领导者
    • 挑战者
    • 追踪者
    • 利基市场参与者
  • 战略展望矩阵
• 2021-2024 年关键发展
  • 併购
  • 伙伴关係和合作
  • 技术进步
  • 扩张和投资策略
  • 数位转型倡议
• 新兴/新创企业竞争对手格局

第五章：市场估计与预测：按类型，2021-2034

• 主要趋势
• 远端控制
• 自主/半自主

第六章：市场估计与预测：依移动性，2021-2034

• 主要趋势
• 履带式机器人
• 轮式机器人
• 腿式机器人
• 杂交种

第七章：市场估计与预测：依营运范围，2021-2034 年

• 主要趋势
• 短距离（<500公尺）
• 中距离（500公尺 – 2公里）
• 长距离（>2公里）

第八章：市场估计与预测：依最终用途，2021-2034

• 主要趋势
• 国防与军事
• 执法
• 国土安全
• 其他的

第九章：市场估计与预测：按地区，2021-2034

• 主要趋势
• 北美洲
  • 我们
  • 加拿大
• 欧洲
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 荷兰
• 亚太地区
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 韩国
  • 澳洲
• 拉丁美洲
  • 巴西
  • 墨西哥
• MEA
  • 南非
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 阿联酋

第十章：公司简介

• Boston Dynamics
• Elbit Systems Ltd.
• Foxtech Robotics
• ICOR Technology
• iRobot Corporation
• L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
• Nex Robotics
• Peraton
• PIAP
• QinetiQ
• Reamda Ltd.
• Roboteam
• Shark Robotics
• SuperDroid Robots
• Teledyne FLIR LLC

The Global Explosive Ordnance Disposal Robots Market was valued at USD 1.8 billion in 2024 and is estimated to grow at a CAGR of 15.1% to reach USD 7.3 billion by 2034. The surge in demand for these systems is largely tied to the growing frequency of security threats worldwide and rising defense investments by governments. As threats evolve in complexity, nations are prioritizing the development and deployment of unmanned technologies to neutralize potential dangers while reducing risk to human lives.

The integration of robotics in explosive ordnance disposal tasks is no longer a niche capability but a critical asset for modern armed forces and security agencies. These robots are increasingly viewed as a frontline solution for tackling explosive hazards in unpredictable scenarios, making them indispensable in both battlefield and civilian operations. Their deployment not only enhances situational awareness and decision-making but also significantly cuts operational costs and personnel risk. As a result, procurement of robotic platforms continues to rise as militaries adapt to asymmetric threats and law enforcement looks for reliable tools in urban environments.

Within the market, EOD robots are categorized by type into remote-controlled and autonomous/semi-autonomous variants. In 2024, remote-controlled robots led the market with a valuation of USD 1.14 billion. Their popularity is rooted in their reliability and affordability, which makes them accessible to a wide range of users, including tactical units and security agencies. Manual control remains essential in scenarios where real-time judgment is crucial, and operators prefer systems that respond instantly to human commands. These platforms are also relatively easier to operate, demand minimal regulatory clearance, and are widely preferred in deployments that require adaptability and real-time oversight.

In terms of end use, the defense and military sector was the leading contributor, accounting for 59% of the global market share in 2024. This dominance is driven by the sector's substantial reliance on robotic systems for tasks such as improvised explosive device (IED) neutralization, tactical reconnaissance, and logistical support in hostile environments. Armed forces across the globe are prioritizing the integration of robotics into their defense strategies to minimize soldier exposure and improve mission success rates. Ongoing investments in force modernization, alongside greater alignment with command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) networks, are further strengthening this segment's lead.

When segmented by operational range, short-range EOD robots dominated the market with a value of USD 821.7 million in 2024. These robots are widely used in urban missions, restricted spaces, and civil operations due to their ease of mobility and suitability for fast-response deployments. Their compact designs and high maneuverability make them ideal for law enforcement, first responders, and bomb squads who need effective tools for localized threats. As security challenges grow in densely populated areas, the demand for such systems is expected to remain strong throughout the forecast period.

Mobility is another key area of segmentation, with robots being divided into tracked, wheeled, legged, and hybrid formats. Among these, tracked robots accounted for a 46.1% market share in 2024. These systems are particularly valued for their superior traction and stability on uneven or debris-filled terrain, which makes them especially useful in combat zones and post-explosion environments. Their rugged construction allows them to carry heavier payloads and operate in harsh conditions, making them the preferred choice for both military and tactical operations.

The United States represented a significant share of the global market, with a valuation of USD 631.5 million in 2024. The country's leadership in this space is fueled by its high defense spending, continuous overseas deployments, and strategic focus on protective technologies for military personnel. The robust demand for advanced EOD systems in the U.S. is also driven by government initiatives that support research and procurement, particularly through agencies such as the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security. Technological advancements in artificial intelligence and automation are further propelling the adoption of next-generation robotic solutions within national security frameworks.

The competitive landscape of the EOD robots market features both established global players and agile regional manufacturers. The top four companies-L3Harris Technologies, Inc., QinetiQ, iRobot Corporation, and Peraton-collectively held a market share of 41.4% in 2024. These leading firms benefit from long-term defense contracts, broad distribution networks, and ongoing investment in R&D. Their dominance is reinforced by strong relationships with government defense bodies and a track record of innovation in unmanned systems. Meanwhile, emerging players are carving out their space by offering specialized, cost-effective solutions tailored to niche applications in law enforcement and civilian security. Collaborative development efforts between private firms and public defense organizations are also accelerating product innovation and reshaping the dynamics of market competition.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Methodology & Scope

• 1.1 Market scope and definition
• 1.2 Research design
  • 1.2.1 Research approach
  • 1.2.2 Data collection methods
• 1.3 Data mining sources
  • 1.3.1 Global
  • 1.3.2 Regional/Country
• 1.4 Base estimates and calculations
  • 1.4.1 Base year calculation
  • 1.4.2 Key trends for market estimation
• 1.5 Primary research and validation
  • 1.5.1 Primary sources
• 1.6 Forecast model
• 1.7 Research assumptions and limitations

Chapter 2 Executive Summary

• 2.1 Industry 360⁰ synopsis
• 2.2 Key market trends
  • 2.2.1 Type trends
  • 2.2.2 Mobility trends
  • 2.2.3 Operational range trends
  • 2.2.4 End use trends
  • 2.2.5 Regional trends
• 2.3 TAM Analysis, 2025-2034 (USD Million)
• 2.4 CXO perspectives: Strategic imperatives
  • 2.4.1 Executive decision points
  • 2.4.2 Critical success factors
• 2.5 Future Outlook and Strategic Recommendations

Chapter 3 Industry Insights

• 3.1 Industry ecosystem analysis
  • 3.1.1 Supplier landscape
  • 3.1.2 Profit margin
  • 3.1.3 Cost structure
  • 3.1.4 Value addition at each stage
  • 3.1.5 Factor affecting the value chain
  • 3.1.6 Disruptions
• 3.2 Trump administration tariffs analysis
  • 3.2.1 Impact on trade
    • 3.2.1.1 Trade volume disruptions
    • 3.2.1.2 Retaliatory measures
  • 3.2.2 Impact on the industry
    • 3.2.2.1 Supply-side impact
      • 3.2.2.1.1 Price volatility in
      • 3.2.2.1.2 Supply chain restructuring
      • 3.2.2.1.3 Production cost implications
    • 3.2.2.2 Demand-side impact
      • 3.2.2.2.1 Price transmission to end markets
      • 3.2.2.2.2 Market share dynamics
      • 3.2.2.2.3 Consumer response patterns
  • 3.2.3 key companies impacted
  • 3.2.4 strategic industry responses
    • 3.2.4.1 Supply chain reconfiguration
    • 3.2.4.2 Pricing and product strategies
    • 3.2.4.3 Policy engagement
  • 3.2.5 Outlook and future considerations
• 3.3 Industry impact forces
  • 3.3.1 Growth drivers
    • 3.3.1.1 Rising global defense expenditures
    • 3.3.1.2 Growing incidences of terrorism & IED threats
    • 3.3.1.3 Adoption of autonomous & AI-driven technologies
    • 3.3.1.4 Expanding use in civilian law enforcement & homeland security
    • 3.3.1.5 Rising civil security applications
  • 3.3.2 Industry pitfalls and challenges
    • 3.3.2.1 High acquisition and maintenance costs
    • 3.3.2.2 Technical complexity & reliability concerns
  • 3.3.3 Market opportunities
• 3.4 Growth potential analysis
• 3.5 Regulatory landscape
  • 3.5.1 North America
  • 3.5.2 Europe
  • 3.5.3 Asia Pacific
  • 3.5.4 Latin America
  • 3.5.5 Middle East & Africa
• 3.6 Porter's analysis
• 3.7 PESTEL analysis
• 3.8 Technology and innovation landscape
  • 3.8.1 Current technological trends
  • 3.8.2 Emerging technologies
• 3.9 Price trends
  • 3.9.1 By region
  • 3.9.2 By product
• 3.10 Pricing strategies
• 3.11 Emerging business models
• 3.12 Compliance requirements
• 3.13 Consumer sentiment analysis
• 3.14 Patent and IP analysis
• 3.15 Geopolitical and trade dynamics

Chapter 4 Competitive Landscape, 2024

• 4.1 Introduction
• 4.2 Company market share analysis
  • 4.2.1 By region
    • 4.2.1.1 North America
    • 4.2.1.2 Europe
    • 4.2.1.3 Asia Pacific
  • 4.2.2 Market concentration analysis
• 4.3 Competitive benchmarking of key players
  • 4.3.1 Financial performance comparison
    • 4.3.1.1 Revenue
    • 4.3.1.2 Profit margin
    • 4.3.1.3 R&D
  • 4.3.2 Product portfolio comparison
    • 4.3.2.1 Product range breadth
    • 4.3.2.2 Technology
    • 4.3.2.3 Innovation
  • 4.3.3 Geographic presence comparison
    • 4.3.3.1 Global footprint analysis
    • 4.3.3.2 Service network coverage
    • 4.3.3.3 Market penetration by region
  • 4.3.4 Competitive positioning matrix
    • 4.3.4.1 Leaders
    • 4.3.4.2 Challengers
    • 4.3.4.3 Followers
    • 4.3.4.4 Niche players
  • 4.3.5 Strategic outlook matrix
• 4.4 Key developments, 2021-2024
  • 4.4.1 Mergers and acquisitions
  • 4.4.2 Partnerships and collaborations
  • 4.4.3 Technological advancements
  • 4.4.4 Expansion and investment strategies
  • 4.4.5 Digital transformation initiatives
• 4.5 Emerging/ startup competitors landscape

Chapter 5 Market Estimates & Forecast, By Type, 2021-2034 (USD Million & Units)

• 5.1 Key trends
• 5.2 Remote controlled
• 5.3 Autonomous/semi-autonomous

Chapter 6 Market Estimates & Forecast, By Mobility, 2021-2034 (USD Million & Units)

• 6.1 Key trends
• 6.2 Tracked robots
• 6.3 Wheeled robots
• 6.4 Legged robots
• 6.5 Hybrid

Chapter 7 Market Estimates & Forecast, By Operational Range, 2021-2034 (USD Million & Units)

• 7.1 Key trends
• 7.2 Short-range (<500 meters)
• 7.3 Medium-range (500m – 2 km)
• 7.4 Long-range (>2 km)

Chapter 8 Market Estimates & Forecast, By End Use, 2021-2034 (USD Million & Units)

• 8.1 Key trends
• 8.2 Defense & military
• 8.3 Law enforcement
• 8.4 Homeland security
• 8.5 Others

Chapter 9 Market Estimates & Forecast, By Region, 2021-2034 (USD Million & Units)

• 9.1 Key trends
• 9.2 North America
  • 9.2.1 U.S.
  • 9.2.2 Canada
• 9.3 Europe
  • 9.3.1 UK
  • 9.3.2 Germany
  • 9.3.3 France
  • 9.3.4 Italy
  • 9.3.5 Spain
  • 9.3.6 Netherlands
• 9.4 Asia Pacific
  • 9.4.1 China
  • 9.4.2 India
  • 9.4.3 Japan
  • 9.4.4 South Korea
  • 9.4.5 Australia
• 9.5 Latin America
  • 9.5.1 Brazil
  • 9.5.2 Mexico
• 9.6 MEA
  • 9.6.1 South Africa
  • 9.6.2 Saudi Arabia
  • 9.6.3 UAE

Chapter 10 Company Profiles

• 10.1 Boston Dynamics
• 10.2 Elbit Systems Ltd.
• 10.3 Foxtech Robotics
• 10.4 ICOR Technology
• 10.5 iRobot Corporation
• 10.6 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
• 10.7 Nex Robotics
• 10.8 Peraton
• 10.9 PIAP
• 10.10 QinetiQ
• 10.11 Reamda Ltd.
• 10.12 Roboteam
• 10.13 Shark Robotics
• 10.14 SuperDroid Robots
• 10.15 Teledyne FLIR LLC