查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
工作负载调度和自动化美国市场规模、份额、趋势分析报告：按部署、企业规模、最终用途、细分趋势：2023-2030 年
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1321462

工作负载调度和自动化美国市场规模、份额、趋势分析报告：按部署、企业规模、最终用途、细分趋势：2023-2030 年

U.S. Workload Scheduling And Automation Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Deployment (Cloud, On-premise), By Enterprise Size, By End-use (BFSI, IT & Telecommunication, Retail, Healthcare), And Segment Forecasts, 2023 - 2030
出版日期: | 出版商: Grand View Research | 英文 178 Pages | 商品交期: 2-10个工作天内

价格

美国工作负载调度和自动化市场增长和趋势

根据 Grand View Research, Inc. 的最新报告，预计 2030 年美国工作负载调度和自动化市场规模将达到 13 亿美元，2023 年至 2030 年年复合成长率约为 7.0%。

该市场的增长是由持续的数字化和云计算的渗透以及对可扩展性日益增长的需求推动的。企业对流程自动化的日益关注增加了对工作负载调度和自动化工具的需求。这些解决方案帮助企业通过触发、调度和执行来自动化各种后端工作流程，以降低成本并提高整体效率。

美国工作负载调度和自动化的上升趋势可能有助于企业减少人工错误、改善批量任务执行、最佳化存储和作业调度，这将推动市场增长，这是驱动力。例如，2023 年 5 月，资讯技术管理公司 Fortra, LLC 与 JAMS 及其工作负载自动化和机器人自动化解决方案 Automate 合作，以提高自动化解决方案的效率并减少多个行业的错误。我们已经开始与美国市场参与者的这些技术进步预计将在预测期内增加对美国负担负载调度和自动化市场的需求。

此外，随着人工智能 (AI) 和机器学习 (ML) 等先进技术的引入，供应商正在增强其工作负载自动化 (WLA) 工具，以改善该国的运营和管理流程、整合能力和整体客户体验。它已经成为可能，稳步改善，这正在推动预测期内的美国工作负载调度和自动化市场。随着越来越多精通技术的用户和业务合作伙伴增加对云计算和普遍网路存取的偏好，Oracle、Cisco Systems 和IBM Corporation 等知名公司正在帮助指导客户的数字化转型之旅，并发挥着重要作用。

美国工作负载调度和自动化市场报告亮点

  • 按部署细分市场划分，由于与云部署相关的各种优势（例如提高可扩展性、可靠性、增强安全性和改善客户服务），云行业预计在预测期内年复合成长率为 9.8%。
  • 按公司规模计算，中小企业预计 2022 年年复合成长率最高，达 7.5%。这是由于 IT 行业的扩张、新兴企业数量的增加以及这些公司对 WLA 解决方案的日益偏好。
  • 基于最终用途细分市场，由于新业务模式、网络平台和利用物联网的能力的不断发展，IT和通讯市场将在2022年占据最大的收入份额，超过23.9%。

目录

第1章调查方法与范围

  • 市场区隔和范围
  • 市场定义
  • 资讯采购
  • 资讯分析
  • 市场形成和资料可视化
  • 资料检验和发布

第2章执行摘要

第3章行业展望

  • 市场体系预测
  • 行业价值链分析
  • 市场动态
    • 市场促进因素分析
    • 市场抑制因素分析
    • 市场挑战
    • 市场机会
  • 行业分析工具
    • 波特的分析
    • 宏观经济分析
  • 美国工作负载调度和自动化市场 - 技术趋势
  • 美国工作负载调度和自动化市场 - 使用案例
  • 美国工作负载调度和自动化市场 – COVID-19 影响分析

第4章美国工作负载调度和自动化市场：按部署进行的估计和趋势分析

  • 2022年和2030年波动分析和市场份额
  • 按部署
    • 本地
    • 云

第5章美国工作负载调度和自动化市场：按公司规模估算和趋势分析

  • 2022年和2030年波动分析和市场份额
  • 按公司规模
    • 大公司
    • 中小企业

第6章美国工作负载调度和自动化市场：最终用途的估计和趋势分析

  • 2022年和2030年波动分析和市场份额
  • 按最终用途
    • BFSI
    • 信息技术和通讯
    • 零售
    • 卫生保健
    • 政府和公共部门
    • 製造业
    • 其他的

第7章竞争形势

  • 主要参与企业
    • ASG Technologies Group, Inc.
    • BMC Software, Inc.
    • CA Technologies（Broadcom Inc.）
    • Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • HCL Technologies Limited
    • Hitachi Vantara Corporation
    • IBM Corporation
    • Oracle Corporation
    • Redwood Software, Inc.
    • ServiceNow
    • SMA Technologies
    • Stonebranch Inc.
    • VMWare Inc.
  • 主要市场参与企业的最新发展和影响
  • 公司分类
  • 参与企业概况
  • 财务绩效
  • 产品基准评效
  • 企业热力图分析
  • 2022 年公司市场份额分析
  • 战略规划
    • 扩张
    • 併购
    • 合作
    • 新产品发布
    • 研究与开发
Product Code: GVR-4-68040-093-4

U.S. Workload Scheduling And Automation Market Growth & Trends

The U.S. workload scheduling and automation market size is estimated to reach USD 1.30 billion by 2030, registering a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of nearly 7.0% from 2023 to 2030, according to a new report by Grand View Research, Inc. The growth of the market is attributed to the continued digitalization and penetration of cloud computing coupled with increasing demand for scalability. The growing inclination of businesses to automate their processes has augmented the demand for workload scheduling and automation tools. These solutions help companies to automate various backend workflows by triggering, scheduling, and executing them in a way that improves overall efficiency along with reduction in costs, which is expected to drive the U.S. workload scheduling market growth over the forecast period.

The growing trend of the U.S. workload scheduling and automation to potentially help enterprises reduce manual errors, improve the execution of batch tasks, and optimize storage and job scheduling is driving market growth. For instance, in May 2023, Fortra, LLC, an information technology management company, launched a link between JAMS and Automate, the company's workload automation and robotic automation solutions, to increase their efficiency in automation solutions and reduce errors across multiple industries. These technological advancements by market players in the U.S. are expected to augment the demand for the U.S. workload scheduling & automation market over the forecast period.

Furthermore, the implementation of advanced technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), allows vendors to enhance their Workload Automation (WLA) tools to ensure improved operational and managerial processes, integration capabilities, and the overall customer experience in the country, which is driving the U.S. workload scheduling and automation market over the forecast period. Prominent companies, such as Oracle, Cisco Systems, Inc., and IBM Corporation, play a crucial role in guiding clients through their digital transformation journey amid the growing preference for cloud computing and pervasive network access along with the increasing number of tech-savvy users and trading partners.

U.S. Workload Scheduling And Automation Market Report Highlights

  • Based on the deployment segment, the cloud segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 9.8% over the forecast period owing to various benefits, such as improved scalability and reliability, better security, and improved customer service, associated with cloud deployment
  • Based on the enterprise size segment, the small and medium enterprise segment is expected to register the highest CAGR of 7.5% in 2022. This can be attributed to the expansion of the IT sector, increasing number of startups, and growing preference for WLA solutions among these enterprises
  • Based on the end-use segment, the IT and telecommunication segment captured the largest revenue share of over 23.9% in 2022 with the continued development of new business models, network platforms, and capabilities to harness the Internet of Things

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope

  • 1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Information Procurement
    • 1.3.1. Purchased Database
    • 1.3.2. GVR's Internal Database
    • 1.3.3. Secondary Sources & Third-Party Perspectives
    • 1.3.4. Primary Research
  • 1.4. Information Analysis
    • 1.4.1. Data Analysis Models
  • 1.5. Market Formulation & Data Visualization
  • 1.6. Data Validation & Publishing

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

  • 2.1. Market Snapshot
  • 2.2. Segment Snapshot
  • 2.3. Competitive Landscape

Chapter 3. Industry Outlook

  • 3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
  • 3.2. Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 3.3. Market Dynamics
    • 3.3.1. Market driver analysis
    • 3.3.2. Market restraint analysis
    • 3.3.3. Market challenges
    • 3.3.4. Market opportunities
  • 3.4. Industry Analysis Tools
    • 3.4.1. PORTER'S analysis
    • 3.4.2. MACROECONOMIC analysis
  • 3.5. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market - Technology Trends
  • 3.6. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market - Use Cases
  • 3.7. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market - COVID-19 Impact Analysis

Chapter 4. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market: Deployment Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 4.1. Deployment Movement Analysis & Market Share, 2022 & 2030
  • 4.2. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Estimates & Forecast, By Deployment (USD Million)
    • 4.2.1. On-premise
    • 4.2.2. Cloud

Chapter 5. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market: Enterprise Size Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 5.1. Enterprise Size Movement Analysis & Market Share, 2022 & 2030
  • 5.2. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Estimates & Forecast, By Enterprise Size (USD Million)
    • 5.2.1. Large Enterprise
    • 5.2.2. Small & Medium Enterprise

Chapter 6. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market: End-use Estimates & Trend Analysis

  • 6.1. End-use Movement Analysis & Market Share, 2022 & 2030
  • 6.2. U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Estimates & Forecast, By End-use (USD Million)
    • 6.2.1. BFSI
    • 6.2.2. IT & Telecommunication
    • 6.2.3. Retail
    • 6.2.4. Healthcare
    • 6.2.5. Government & Public Sector
    • 6.2.6. Manufacturing
    • 6.2.7. Others

Chapter 7. Competitive Landscape

  • 7.1 Key Participants
    • 7.1.1. ASG Technologies Group, Inc.
    • 7.1.2. BMC Software, Inc.
    • 7.1.3. CA Technologies (Broadcom Inc.)
    • 7.1.4. Cisco Systems, Inc.
    • 7.1.5. HCL Technologies Limited
    • 7.1.6. Hitachi Vantara Corporation
    • 7.1.7. IBM Corporation
    • 7.1.8. Oracle Corporation
    • 7.1.9. Redwood Software, Inc.
    • 7.1.10. ServiceNow
    • 7.1.11. SMA Technologies
    • 7.1.12. Stonebranch Inc.
    • 7.1.13. VMWare Inc.
  • 7.2 Recent Development & Impact, By Key Market Participants
  • 7.3 Company Categorization
  • 7.4 Participant's Overview
  • 7.5 Financial Performance
  • 7.6 Product Benchmarking
  • 7.7 Company Heat Map Analysis
  • 7.8 Company Market Share Analysis, 2022
  • 7.9 Strategy Mapping
    • 7.9.1 Expansion
    • 7.9.2 Mergers & acquisition
    • 7.9.3 Collaborations
    • 7.9.4 New product launches
    • 7.9.5 Research & Development

List of Tables

  • Table 1 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast, By Deployment, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 2 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast, By Enterprise Size, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 3 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Revenue Estimates and Forecast, By End Use, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
  • Table 4 Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, By Key Market Participants
  • Table 5 Key company categorization
  • Table 6 Company Heat Map Analysis
  • Table 7 Key companies undergoing expansions
  • Table 8 Key companies involved in mergers and acquisitions
  • Table 9 Key companies undergoing collaborations
  • Table 10 Key companies launching new products
  • Table 11 Key Companies undertaking R&D activities

List of Figures

  • Fig. 1 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Segmentation
  • Fig. 2 Information Procurement
  • Fig. 3 Data Analysis Models
  • Fig. 4 Market Formulation and Validation
  • Fig. 5 Data Validating & Publishing
  • Fig. 6 Market Snapshot
  • Fig. 7 Segment Snapshot
  • Fig. 8 Competitive Landscape Snapshot
  • Fig. 9 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Value, 2022 (USD Million)
  • Fig. 10 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation- Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • Fig. 11 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market Dynamics
  • Fig. 12 Key Market Driver Impact
  • Fig. 13 Key Market Restraint Impact
  • Fig. 14 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market: PORTER's Five Forces Analysis
  • Fig. 15 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market: Macroeconomic Analysis
  • Fig. 16 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market, by Deployment, Key Takeaways
  • Fig. 17 Deployment movement analysis & market share, 2022 & 2030 (USD Million)
  • Fig. 18 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market, by Enterprise Size, Key Takeaways
  • Fig. 19 Enterprise Size movement analysis & market share, 2022 & 2030 (USD Million)
  • Fig. 20 U.S. Workload Scheduling & Automation Market, by End-use, Key Takeaways
  • Fig. 21 End-use movement analysis & market share, 2022 & 2030 (USD Million)
  • Fig. 22 Key Company Categorization
  • Fig. 23 Company Market Share Analysis, 2022
  • Fig. 24 Strategic framework