美国汽车紧急呼叫市场规模、份额和趋势报告：按推进类型、触发器类型、车辆类型和细分市场预测，2025 年至 2030 年

美国汽车紧急呼叫市场规模及趋势：

预计 2024 年美国汽车电子呼叫市场规模将达到 3.639 亿美元，2025 年至 2030 年复合年增长率将达到 12.8%。

该市场的成长得益于多种驱动因素，主要与日益增长的安全需求和车辆互联技术的进步有关。其中最重要的因素之一是消费者和监管机构对车辆安全的日益重视。虽然联邦政府并未强制要求安装电子呼叫系统，但来自州级机构以及美国公路交通安全管理局 (NHTSA) 等组织的压力正促使汽车製造商增强车载安全功能。这种推动力推动了整合电子呼叫功能的高级驾驶辅助系统 (ADAS) 的普及，从而加速了市场的成长。

消费者对安全保障的意识和期望也扮演关键角色。电子呼叫系统能够在发生严重事故时自动通知紧急服务，日益被视为车辆安全的关键组成部分。公共宣传活动以及媒体对道路交通事故死亡人数和快速紧急应变重要性的报道，进一步推动了这项需求的成长。

美国交通事故发生率相对较高，凸显了快速应变能力的重要性。透过自动向紧急救援人员提供事故的准确位置和详细信息，电子呼叫系统可以显着缩短响应时间，并有可能挽救生命。这项价值提案引起了消费者和政策制定者的强烈共鸣，尤其是在人口稠密、交通拥挤的都市区。

目标商标产品製造商 (OEM) 也在推动 e-Call 系统的应用，将其作为产品差异化策略的一部分。许多美国主要汽车製造商正在将 e-Call 整合到更广泛的安全和互联服务包中，例如通用汽车的 OnStar。这些服务通常捆绑在高级配置或订阅服务中，以增强其市场吸引力。此外，保险业也为配备先进安全系统的车辆提供保费折扣等奖励，从而促进了 e-Call 市场的成长。这符合基于使用情况的保险 (UBI) 的大趋势，UBI 依赖远端资讯处理并提高了 e-Call 系统的效用。

儘管成长机会光明，美国汽车电子呼叫产业仍面临诸多限制因素，可能限制其广泛应用和扩充性。主要挑战之一是缺乏联邦政府的强制要求，导致不同车型和品牌的采用不一致。如果没有监管强制执行，一些OEM可能不会优先在定价模式中配备电子呼叫功能。此外，隐私和资料安全问题也是主要障碍。由于电子呼叫系统依赖即时传输车辆和位置讯息，许多消费者担心敏感资讯被滥用或洩露。

目录

第一章调查方法与范围

第二章执行摘要

第 3 章美国汽车紧急呼叫变数、趋势与范围

• 市场展望
• 市场动态
  • 市场驱动因素分析
  • 市场限制因素分析
  • 产业挑战
• 美国汽车紧急呼叫分析工具
  • 产业分析-波特五力分析
  • PESTEL分析

第四章美国汽车紧急呼叫市场：推进类型评估与趋势分析

• 细分仪表板
• 美国汽车紧急呼叫市场：2024 年和 2030 年推进类型变化分析
• ICE
• 电动机

第五章美国汽车紧急呼叫市场：触发类型估计与趋势分析

• 细分仪表板
• 美国汽车紧急呼叫市场：2024 年和 2030 年触发类型变化分析
• 手动启动 eCall (MIeC)
• 自动发起紧急呼叫 (AIeC)

第六章美国汽车紧急呼叫市场：车型估算与趋势分析

• 细分仪表板
• 美国汽车紧急呼叫市场：2024年及2030年各车型变化分析
• 搭乘用车
• 商用车

第七章 竞争态势

• 公司分类
• 公司市场定位
• 公司热图分析
• 公司简介/上市公司
  • HARMAN International
  • Continental AG
  • OnStar（General Motors）
  • DENSO CORPORATION
  • Robert Bosch GmbH
  • Aptiv
  • Telit Cinterion
  • Visteon Corporation
  • Infineon Technologies AG
  • STMicroelectronics

U.S. Automotive eCall Market Size & Trends:

The U.S. automotive eCall market size was estimated at USD 363.9 million in 2024 and is expected to register a CAGR of 12.8% from 2025 to 2030. The market is experiencing growth due to several converging drivers, primarily linked to increasing safety demands and advancements in vehicle connectivity. One of the foremost catalysts is the growing emphasis on vehicle safety from both consumers and regulatory bodies. While there is no federal mandate for eCall systems, pressure from state-level authorities and organizations such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) encourages automakers to enhance in-vehicle safety features. This push has expanded the adoption of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), which also integrate eCall functionalities, helping to accelerate market growth.

Consumer awareness and expectations for safety and security are also playing a pivotal role. More vehicle buyers are prioritizing safety in their purchase decisions, seeking features that can offer real-time assistance during emergencies. eCall systems, which automatically notify emergency services in the event of a serious collision, are increasingly viewed as critical components of vehicle safety. This heightened demand is further reinforced by public safety campaigns and media coverage surrounding road accident fatalities and the importance of rapid emergency response.

The relatively high rate of road accidents in the U.S. underscores the importance of rapid response capabilities. eCall systems, by automatically alerting emergency services with precise location and crash details, can significantly reduce response times and potentially save lives. This value proposition resonates strongly with consumers and policymakers alike, especially in densely populated and traffic-congested urban areas.

Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) are also pushing the adoption of eCall systems as part of their product differentiation strategies. Many leading U.S. automakers have integrated eCall into broader safety and connectivity service packages, such as GM's OnStar. These offerings are often bundled as part of premium trims or subscription-based services, adding to their appeal in the market. Additionally, the insurance industry is contributing to the growth of the eCall market by offering incentives such as reduced premiums for vehicles equipped with advanced safety systems. This aligns with the broader trend of usage-based insurance (UBI), which relies on telematics and enhances the utility of eCall systems.

Despite promising growth opportunities, the U.S. Automotive eCall industry faces several restraints that may limit its broader adoption and scalability. One of the primary challenges is the lack of a federal mandate, which leads to inconsistent implementation across vehicle classes and brands. Without regulatory enforcement, some OEMs may deprioritize the inclusion of eCall in lower-end models. Additionally, privacy and data security concerns are significant barriers. Since eCall systems rely on transmitting vehicle and location data in real time, many consumers are wary of potential misuse or breaches of sensitive information.

U.S. Automotive eCall Market Report Segmentation

This report forecasts revenue growth at country level and provides an analysis on the industry trends in each of the sub-segments from 2018 to 2030. For the purpose of this study, Grand View Research has segmented the U.S. automotive eCall market report based on propulsion type, trigger type, and vehicle type.

• Propulsion Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
• ICE
• Electric Motor
• Trigger Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
• Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC)
• Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC)
• Vehicle Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2018 - 2030)
• Passenger Cars
• Commercial Vehicles

Table of Contents

Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope

• 1.1. Market Segmentation and Scope
• 1.2. Research Methodology
  • 1.2.1. Information Procurement
• 1.3. Information or Data Analysis
• 1.4. Methodology
• 1.5. Research Scope and Assumptions
• 1.6. Market Formulation & Validation
• 1.7. Country Based Segment Share Calculation
• 1.8. List of Data Sources

Chapter 2. Executive Summary

• 2.1. Market Outlook
• 2.2. Segment Outlook
• 2.3. Competitive Insights

Chapter 3. U.S. Automotive eCall Variables, Trends, & Scope

• 3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
• 3.2. Market Dynamics
  • 3.2.1. Market Drivers Analysis
  • 3.2.2. Market Restraints Analysis
  • 3.2.3. Industry Challenge
• 3.3. U.S. Automotive eCall Analysis Tools
  • 3.3.1. Industry Analysis - Porter's
    • 3.3.1.1. Bargaining Power Of The Suppliers
    • 3.3.1.2. Bargaining Power Of The Buyers
    • 3.3.1.3. Threats Of Substitution
    • 3.3.1.4. Threats From New Entrants
    • 3.3.1.5. Competitive Rivalry
  • 3.3.2. PESTEL Analysis

Chapter 4. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Propulsion Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

• 4.1. Segment Dashboard
• 4.2. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Propulsion Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
• 4.3. ICE
  • 4.3.1. ICE Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• 4.4. Electric Motor
  • 4.4.1. Electric Motor Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 5. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Trigger Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

• 5.1. Segment Dashboard
• 5.2. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Trigger Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
• 5.3. Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC)
  • 5.3.1. Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC) Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• 5.4. Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC)
  • 5.4.1. Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC) Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 6. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Vehicle Type Estimates & Trend Analysis

• 6.1. Segment Dashboard
• 6.2. U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Vehicle Type Movement Analysis, 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
• 6.3. Passenger Cars
  • 6.3.1. Passenger Cars Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• 6.4. Commercial Vehicles
  • 6.4.1. Commercial Vehicles Market Revenue Estimates and Forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

Chapter 7. Competitive Landscape

• 7.1. Company Categorization
• 7.2. Company Market Positioning
• 7.3. Company Heat Map Analysis
• 7.4. Company Profiles/Listing
  • 7.4.1. HARMAN International
    • 7.4.1.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.1.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.1.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.1.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.2. Continental AG
    • 7.4.2.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.2.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.2.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.2.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.3. OnStar (General Motors)
    • 7.4.3.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.3.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.3.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.3.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.4. DENSO CORPORATION
    • 7.4.4.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.4.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.4.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.4.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.5. Robert Bosch GmbH
    • 7.4.5.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.5.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.5.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.5.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.6. Aptiv
    • 7.4.6.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.6.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.6.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.6.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.7. Telit Cinterion
    • 7.4.7.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.7.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.7.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.7.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.8. Visteon Corporation
    • 7.4.8.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.8.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.8.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.8.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.9. Infineon Technologies AG
    • 7.4.9.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.9.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.9.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.9.4. Strategic Initiatives
  • 7.4.10. STMicroelectronics
    • 7.4.10.1. Participant's Overview
    • 7.4.10.2. Financial Performance
    • 7.4.10.3. Application Benchmarking
    • 7.4.10.4. Strategic Initiatives

List of Tables

• Table 1 U.S. Automotive eCall Market, by Propulsion Type, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Table 2 U.S. Automotive eCall Market, by Trigger Type, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Table 3 U.S. Automotive eCall Market, by Vehicle Type, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)

List of Figures

• Fig. 1 U.S. Automotive eCall Market Segmentation
• Fig. 2 Market research process
• Fig. 3 Information procurement
• Fig. 4 Primary research pattern
• Fig. 5 Market research approaches
• Fig. 6 Value chain-based sizing & forecasting
• Fig. 7 Parent market analysis
• Fig. 8 Market formulation & validation
• Fig. 9 U.S. Automotive eCall Market Snapshot
• Fig. 10 U.S. Automotive eCall Market Segment Snapshot
• Fig. 11 U.S. Automotive eCall Market Competitive Landscape Snapshot
• Fig. 12 Market research process
• Fig. 13 Market driver relevance analysis (Current & future impact)
• Fig. 14 Market restraint relevance analysis (Current & future impact)
• Fig. 15 U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Propulsion Type outlook key takeaways (USD Million)
• Fig. 16 U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Propulsion Type movement analysis 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 17 ICE market revenue estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 18 Electric Motor market revenue estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 19 U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Trigger Type outlook key takeaways (USD Million)
• Fig. 20 U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Trigger Type movement analysis 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 21 Manually Initiated eCall (MIeC) Trigger Type market revenue estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 22 Automatically Initiated eCall (AIeC) Trigger Type market revenue estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 23 U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Vehicle Type outlook key takeaways (USD Million)
• Fig. 24 U.S. Automotive eCall Market: Vehicle Type movement analysis 2024 & 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 25 Passenger Cars market revenue estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 26 Commercial Vehicles market revenue estimates and forecasts, 2018 - 2030 (USD Million)
• Fig. 27 Strategy framework
• Fig. 28 Company categorization