全球传统髋关节螺丝市场：市场规模、份额和趋势分析（2025-2031 年）

2024年全球传统髋螺丝市场价值为1.6亿美元。预计到2031年，该市场将达到1.42亿美元，年复合成长率为-1.6%。

本报告涵盖所有传统髋螺钉产品，包括钛合金和不銹钢材质。报告量化了销售量、平均售价、市场价值、成长率和企业市场占有率。此外，报告还分析了手术量、市场驱动因素和限制因素、近期併购、公司策略和技术趋势。历史资料截至2021年，预测资料截至2031年。

市场概览

传统髋螺钉仍然是近端股骨骨折的主要且广泛应用的治疗方法。虽然髓内钉是许多股骨粗隆间和粗隆下骨折的首选治疗方案，但当解剖结构和骨折类型允许使用钢板和拉力螺钉进行稳定固定时，传统的动力髋螺钉固定仍然被广泛采用。此技术已被骨科医生广泛认可，所需器械易于取得，且在骨折粉碎程度较轻的情况下，手术操作相对简单。

市场下滑反映了关节重建。同时，在手术时间缩短、成本控製或外科医生熟悉度更为重要的情况下，传统髋关节螺钉仍然发挥作用。在采用竞标或集团合约的医疗系统中，传统髋螺丝较低的平均售价（ASP）确保了其在价格敏感型药品清单上的持续存在，尤其是在预算限制导致无法获得更昂贵设备的情况下。

材料选择也是一个重要因素。由于不銹钢的刚度高、易于取得且成本低廉，大多数传统髋螺丝都采用不銹钢製成。但在某些情况下，由于钛合金具有良好的生物相容性和重量优势，其应用已逐渐增加。虽然这种转变幅度小于髓内固定装置，但已对产品组合产生影响，导致库存的钛合金钢板螺丝组合略有价格分布。

不同地区的使用情况因临床通讯协定、报销系统和外科医生培训而异。北美和西欧等成熟市场已显着转向使用髓内钉和全关节重建某些类型的骨折。同时，拉丁美洲、东欧、中东和非洲部分地区以及亚太部分地区，传统髋螺钉在医院的使用率仍然很高，设备可用性、成本和培训情况是决定治疗方案的主要因素。

儘管价值呈下降趋势，但作为可靠且价格合理的库存物品，该类别对医院价值炼和创伤服务仍然至关重要。供应商在物流、尺寸范围、服务应对力以及既定产品特性方面展开竞争。在预测期内，市场表现将取决于各地区的手术组合、竞标结果以及置换术速度。

市场驱动因素

外科医生常用的技术

由于外科医生长期以来熟练了这项技术，传统髋螺钉仍然被广泛使用。培训计画教授这项技术已有数十年之久，许多外科医生在钢板和拉力螺丝的植入方面都非常熟练。对于粉碎性骨折程度较轻的病例，特别是稳定的股骨粗隆间骨折，这种技术可能比其他方法更快。手术时间的缩短和器械操作的可预测性，使得传统系统在特定病例中继续得到常规应用，即使整体市场萎缩，也仍然维持着基准的需求。

钛材料

儘管不銹钢仍然是传统髋螺钉系统的主要材料，但钛的应用正逐渐普及。外科医师可能出于特定病患因素或为了与其他钛创伤器械实现标准化服务而选择钛合金。钛的生物相容性和轻质特性是其众所周知的优势，但其高昂的价格限制了其在註重成本的医疗机构中的应用。虽然这种变化不会扭转整体市场萎缩的趋势，但储备钛合金产品将有助于维持价格结构，并略微抵消不銹钢产品的价格压力。

价格竞争与预算适宜性

与髓内固定装置相比，传统髋螺钉在价格上具有竞争力，这在按价格排名竞标以及医院预算紧张的情况下至关重要。由于平均售价低于髓内髋关节螺钉，传统髋关节螺钉仍然是许多医疗机构产品目录和急救包中的必备品。产品知名度高且初始植入成本低，即使其用途仅限于某些特定类型的骨折和患者，也促使医疗机构持续采购。

市场限制

平均售价（ASP）下降

在各个地区，集团采购组织、政府采购和基于价值的采购计画正持续对整形外科植入的平均售价（ASP）施加下行压力。医院正在整合采购以降低价格，并实现托盘标准化和物流简化。始于2021年底的中国国家采购体系改革就是一个强而有力的价格压缩案例。西欧和北美部分地区也出现了类似的倡议，限制了商品化医疗器材的定价权。对于售价本就低廉的传统髋螺丝而言，其价格空间有限，难以添加高端功能，平均售价的下降会迅速转化为价值的降低。

替代疗法

两种替代疗法持续推动市场需求。第一种是髓内髋钉，它能提供负荷分担结构，提高旋转和轴向稳定性，并能有效治疗股骨粗隆间骨折和股骨粗隆下骨折。第二种是全髋置换术。随着外科医生在老年患者复杂骨折的部分和全髋置换术累积经验，以及植入设计的改进，全关节重建正成为越来越常见的选择。这两种疗法都在减少以往使用传统螺丝和钢板治疗的病例数。

髋关节置换术的进展

髋关节置换术在耐用性、贴合度、生物相容性和植入便利性方面均取得了显着进展。对于移位性股骨颈颈部和老年患者的某些不稳定骨折类型，关节置换术可能有助于患者更快恢復功能。随着关节置换疗效和治疗方案的改进，外科医生越来越多地选择置换术而非内固定。这种临床转变导致符合传统螺钉内固定指征的病例减少，从而维持了整体市场的下滑趋势。

市场覆盖范围和数据范围

• 目标时期：基准年2024年，预测期间2025-2031年，历史资料2021-2023年
• 医疗机构：医院和创伤中心，在急诊和紧急护理途径中治疗股骨近端骨折。
• 调查方法：收入模型为单位销售量乘以平均售价（ASP），并根据有关手术量、竞标结果和置换手术的假设检验。

产品组合按材质分类，并与区域采购模式相符。

市场区隔摘要

• 传统髋关节螺丝市场－进一步细分为以下几个部分：

不銹钢

钛

• 量化指标：市场规模、市场占有率、市场预测、成长率、销售量、平均售价。
• 定性内容：市场成长趋势、市场限制、主要竞争对手的竞争和 SWOT 分析、併购、公司简介、产品系列、颠覆性技术、疾病概况。
• 资料来源：对行业领导者的直接访谈、政府和监管资料集、医院采购资讯、进出口资料以及 iData Research 内部资料库。

竞争分析

德普合成公司

2024年，DePuy Synthes在传统髋螺钉市场占据领先地位。该公司的LCP®动态髋关节螺丝（DHS）刀片及配套钢板系统应用广泛，并在创伤领域拥有强大的品牌知名度。 DePuy Synthes的全球规模、广泛的分销网络以及在众多医院董事会中的良好口碑，为其持续领先地位提供了有力支撑。鑑于该公司在钢板和螺丝领域的布局，预计其在传统髋螺钉市场的地位将在预测期内保持稳定。

史赛克

史赛克凭藉其Omega-3™传统髋关节螺丝系统，成为第二大竞争对手。该产品系列配备了最新的钢板轴孔锁定选项，并与史赛克广泛的创伤平台整合。强大的品牌、高效率的物流和培训计画有助于客户维繫。儘管史赛克专注于髓内固定装置等高成长领域，这可能会限制其在这个较小细分市场中的市场份额快速成长，但该公司已做好充分准备，保持其市场地位。

Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet以其HipLoc动态加压螺丝和传统髋关节螺丝（CHS）产品线位居第三。传统髋螺丝在该公司整体创伤产品系列中占比相对较小，预计市场份额将保持稳定。 Zimmer Biomet透过可靠的供应和一系列互补的创伤植入产品来保持竞争力，这些产品既可用于竞标合同，也可用于私人采购。

其他区域供应商也参与区域竞标，提供具有竞争力的价格和基本的板材及螺丝系统。虽然这些公司可能会影响区域价格，但全球市场份额仍然集中在符合国际品质标准并拥有广泛服务网络的跨国公司手中。

科技与临床趋势

标准化钢板系统：传统的髋螺丝产品组合围绕可预测的钢板孔模式和拉力螺丝选项进行组织，以简化对准和加压。

锁定功能选项：用于钢板轴孔的锁定螺丝可改善骨质疏鬆骨骼的固定，并在适当时帮助弥合与更现代结构之间的差距。

低轮廓钢板。更纤薄的钢板形状和抛光边缘可以减少软组织刺激，并可能降低器械取出率。

熟悉器械。熟悉的钻头、导引器和加压装置简化了准备和手术流程，有助于在简单骨折中持续使用。

材料的选择取决于病例组合。不銹钢仍然是成本驱动型采购的标准材料。钛合金则常用于那些创伤中心采用统一材料或优先考虑生物相容性的医院。

捆绑策略：供应商通常会将传统的髋螺丝捆绑成更大的钢板和螺丝捆绑包，以保护其在竞标中的份额，并统一创伤治疗线的服务水平。

地区

本版提供了涵盖北美、欧洲、亚太地区、拉丁美洲以及中东和非洲的全球调查结果。

包括调查方法附录和简称表。

目录

图表清单

图表列表

调查方法

全球关税的影响

传统髋关节螺丝市场

• 执行摘要
  • 全球传统髋关节螺丝市场概览
  • 竞争分析
  • 流程分段
  • 市场区隔
  • 目标区域
• 介绍
• 手术次数
  • 传统髋关节螺钉手术
• 市场概览
  • 按细分市场
  • 按地区
• 市场分析与预测
  • 传统髋关节螺丝市场总规模
  • 不銹钢常规髋螺丝市场
  • 钛合金传统髋螺丝市场
• 驾驶员和约束装置
• 竞争市占率分析

简称

The global conventional hip screw market was valued at $160 million in 2024. The market is expected to decrease at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of -1.6 percent, reaching $142 million by 2031.

This report covers the full suite of products in the conventional hip screw category, including titanium and stainless steel constructs. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares. It analyzes procedure numbers, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, company strategies, and technology trends. Historical data extend to 2021 with forecasts through 2031.

Market Overview

Conventional hip screws remain a familiar workhorse in proximal femoral fracture care. Although intramedullary hip nails have become the preferred choice in many intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric indications, conventional dynamic hip screw constructs continue to be used where anatomy and fracture pattern allow stable fixation with a plate and lag screw. The technique is well known to orthopedic surgeons, instrumentation is widely available, and the procedures are relatively straightforward in less comminuted cases.

The market's decline reflects a steady clinical migration to intramedullary fixation and a rising preference for arthroplasty in older and osteoporotic patients. At the same time, conventional hip screws retain a role in settings where short operating time, cost control, or surgeon familiarity carry more weight. In systems that use tender purchasing and group contracts, the lower ASP of conventional hip screws ensures continued presence on price sensitive formularies, especially when budgets limit access to premium devices.

Material selection is another factor. The majority of conventional hip screws are stainless steel due to stiffness, wide availability, and lower price. There is a gradual shift toward titanium in select settings for biocompatibility and weight related benefits. This shift is modest compared with intramedullary devices, but it influences mix and creates small pockets of premium pricing where titanium plate and screw constructs are stocked.

Across regions, utilization varies with clinical protocols, reimbursement, and surgeon training. Mature markets in North America and Western Europe show the most pronounced shift to intramedullary nails and to arthroplasty for select fracture types. Parts of Latin America, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and segments of Asia Pacific continue to use conventional hip screws more often in hospitals where equipment availability, cost, and training guide treatment selection.

Despite the downward value trend, the category remains important to hospital supply chains and to trauma services that need a reliable and affordable option on the shelf. Vendors compete on logistics, breadth of sizes, and service response as much as on product features, which are well established. Over the forecast horizon, market performance depends on procedure mix, tender outcomes, and the relative pace of adoption for intramedullary fixation and hip replacement in each region.

Market Drivers

Surgeon Familiarity

Conventional hip screws persist due to longstanding surgeon familiarity. Training programs have taught this method for decades, and many surgeons are highly efficient with plate and lag screw constructs. In less comminuted fractures, especially stable intertrochanteric patterns, the technique can be faster than alternative options. Shorter operative time and predictable instrumentation keep conventional systems in routine use for selected cases, which supports baseline unit demand even as the market contracts overall.

Titanium Material

While stainless steel is still the dominant material in conventional hip screw systems, there is a gradual increase in titanium use. Surgeons may choose titanium for specific patient factors or for service standardization with other titanium trauma sets. Titanium's biocompatibility and lower weight are known benefits, though the higher price affects adoption in cost sensitive facilities. The shift does not reverse the total market decline, but it can help maintain price mix where titanium options are stocked, creating small offsets to price compression in stainless steel lines.

Price Competition and Budget Fit

Conventional hip screws are price competitive relative to intramedullary devices. This matters where tenders rank offers by price and where hospital budgets are tight. Because the ASP is lower than that of IM hip screws, conventional constructs remain in catalogs and in emergency kits in many institutions. Even as usage narrows to specific fracture types and patient profiles, the combination of familiarity and lower upfront implant costs helps sustain ongoing purchases.

Market Limiters

ASP Decreases

Across regions, group purchasing organizations, government tenders, and value based procurement programs continue to place downward pressure on ASPs for orthopedic implants. Hospitals consolidate purchasing to extract lower prices, standardize trays, and simplify logistics. China's national procurement changes that began at the end of 2021 are a clear example of strong price compression. Similar dynamics in Western Europe and parts of North America limit pricing power for commoditized devices. For conventional hip screws, which already sell at lower prices, the room for premium features is small, so ASP erosion translates quickly into value decline.

Alternative Therapies

Two alternatives continue to limit demand. The first is the intramedullary hip nail, which offers a load sharing construct, better control of rotational and axial stability, and strong outcomes for intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. The second is hip arthroplasty. As surgeons gain experience with partial and total hip replacement for complex fractures in older patients, and as implant designs improve, arthroplasty is selected more often. Both options reduce the pool of cases that would otherwise use conventional screws and plates.

Growth of Hip Replacement

Hip replacement has advanced in durability, fit, biocompatibility, and ease of implantation. For displaced femoral neck fractures and for some unstable patterns in elderly patients, arthroplasty may offer faster return to function. As arthroplasty outcomes and pathways improve, surgeons are more likely to select replacement over internal fixation. This clinical shift lowers addressable volume for conventional screws and keeps the overall market on a downward trajectory.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

• Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
• Care settings: Hospitals and trauma centers treating proximal femoral fractures across emergency and urgent pathways.
• Methodology: Revenues modeled as units multiplied by ASP, validated against procedure volumes, tender outcomes, and replacement assumptions.

Unit mix is segmented by material type and mapped to regional procurement patterns.

Market Segmentation Summary

• Conventional Hip Screw Market - Further Segmented Into:

Stainless Steel

Titanium

• Quantitative coverage: Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and average selling prices.
• Qualitative coverage: Market growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
• Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and regulatory datasets, hospital procurement inputs, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.

Competitive Analysis

DePuy Synthes

DePuy Synthes held the leading share of the conventional hip screw market in 2024. The company's LCP(R) Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) Blade and related plate systems are widely used and benefit from strong brand recognition in trauma. DePuy Synthes' global scale, broad sales coverage, and established preference with many hospital committees support sustained leadership. Given the company's footprint in plates and screws, its position in conventional hip screws is expected to remain stable over the forecast period.

Stryker

Stryker was the second leading competitor with the Omega3(TM) conventional hip screw system. The portfolio features current locking options for plate shaft holes and integrates with Stryker's broader trauma platform. Brand strength, efficient logistics, and training programs support account retention. Stryker's focus on higher growth segments, such as intramedullary constructs, may limit aggressive share pursuit in this smaller category, but the company is well placed to maintain its position.

Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet ranked third with the HipLoc Dynamic Compression Screw and Conventional Hip Screw (CHS) lines. Conventional hip screws are a smaller focus within the company's total trauma portfolio, and market share is expected to remain stable. Zimmer Biomet competes through dependable supply and a complementary set of trauma implants that allows the company to serve both tender contracts and private purchasers.

Other regional suppliers participate in local tenders with competitive pricing and basic plate and screw systems. While these companies can influence regional pricing, the global share structure is concentrated among the leading multinationals who meet international quality standards and maintain wide service coverage.

Technology and Practice Trends

Standardized plate systems. Conventional hip screw portfolios continue to center on predictable plate hole patterns and lag screw options that streamline alignment and compression.

Locking options. Locking screws for plate shaft holes provide improved fixation in osteoporotic bone, helping bridge the gap with more modern constructs where appropriate.

Low profile plates. Slimmer plate profiles and polished edges reduce soft tissue irritation and may reduce hardware removal rates.

Instrumentation familiarity. Well known drills, guides, and compression devices keep setup and surgical steps simple, which supports continued use in straightforward fractures.

Material choice by case mix. Stainless steel remains the default for cost sensitive procurement. Titanium is stocked where hospitals want one material standard across trauma sets or where biocompatibility is prioritized.

Bundle strategies. Vendors often position conventional hip screws within larger plate and screw bundles to protect share in tenders and to align service levels across trauma lines.

Geography

This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary included.

Why This Report

Where the largest and fastest changing opportunities exist within conventional hip screws by material and region through 2031.

How the shift to intramedullary fixation and arthroplasty is reshaping procedure mix and implant demand.

What pricing dynamics result from GPOs, government tendering, and value based procurement programs, and how these dynamics differ by region.

Which competitors are best positioned to defend share in this mature category and how portfolio depth, logistics, and training influence account retention.

How material selection and bundle strategies can help maintain price mix and service levels in cost constrained contracts.

What clinical scenarios still favor conventional constructs and how hospitals can optimize stocking to support urgent care while managing costs.

The Global Conventional Hip Screw Market Report from iData Research answers these questions with device level sizing, company share analysis, and pricing detail.

Use it to quantify demand, plan product and pricing strategy, benchmark against competitors, and align tender responses to regional buying patterns.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Conventional Hip Screw Market

• 9.1 Executive Summary
  • 9.1.1 Global Conventional Hip Screw Market Overview
  • 9.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 9.1.3 Procedure Segmentation
  • 9.1.4 Market Segmentation
  • 9.1.5 Regions Included
• 9.2 Introduction
• 9.3 Procedure Numbers
  • 9.3.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Procedures
• 9.4 Market Overview
  • 9.4.1 By Segment
  • 9.4.2 By Region
• 9.5 Market Analysis And Forecast
  • 9.5.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Market
  • 9.5.2 Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market
  • 9.5.3 Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market
• 9.6 Drivers And Limiters
  • 9.6.1 Market Drivers
  • 9.6.2 Market Limiters
• 9.7 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 9-1: Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2024 & 2031
• Chart 9-2: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures, Global, 2024
• Chart 9-3: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 9-4: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Segment, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 9-5: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 9-6: Leading Competitors, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 9-1: Conventional Hip Screw Procedure Segmentation
• Figure 9-2: Conventional Hip Screw Market Segmentation
• Figure 9-3: Conventional Hip Screw Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2)
• Figure 9-4: Conventional Hip Screw Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2)
• Figure 9-5: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-6: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, North America, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-7: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2021 - 2031 (1 of 2)
• Figure 9-8: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2021 - 2031 (2 of 2)
• Figure 9-9: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-10: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2021 - 2031 (1 of 2)
• Figure 9-11: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2021 - 2031 (2 of 2)
• Figure 9-12: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-13: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2021 - 2031 (1 of 3)
• Figure 9-14: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2021 - 2031 (2 of 3)
• Figure 9-15: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2021 - 2031 (3 of 3)
• Figure 9-16: Conventional Hip Screw Procedures by Country, Africa, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-17: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Segment, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-18: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Region, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-19: Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-20: Units Sold by Region, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-21: Average Selling Price by Region, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 9-22: Market Value by Region, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-23: Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-24: Units Sold by Region, Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-25: Average Selling Price by Region, Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 9-26: Market Value by Region, Stainless-Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-27: Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-28: Units Sold by Region, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 9-29: Average Selling Price by Region, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 9-30: Market Value by Region, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 9-31: Leading Competitors, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Global, 2024