全球骨钉市场：市场规模、份额和趋势分析（2025-2031年）

2024年全球骨钉市场价值为1.55亿美元。预计到2031年，该市场将达到1.92亿美元，年复合成长率为3.1%。

本报告涵盖骨钉，骨钉用于在手术中稳定骨碎片和固定骨折。报告量化了销售量、平均售价 (ASP)、市场规模、成长率和企业市场占有率。此外，报告还分析了手术趋势、市场驱动因素和限制因素、近期併购以及技术变革。历史资料截至 2021 年，预测资料截至 2031 年。

市场概览

骨钉是整形外科创伤治疗中的基础器械。其结构简单、尺寸齐全，且与标准器械相容，使其成为临时固定和许多最终固定病例的主要选择。外科医生使用克氏针（K-wire）和斯坦曼氏针进行临时骨折碎片控制、牵引、骨骼稳定以及小骨的最终固定。

儘管骨钉的平均售价较低，但由于手术量的增加以及外科医生将骨钉与其他固定装置联合使用，其市场正在成长。一个关键因素是骨钉与钢板螺丝手术流程的紧密联繫。骨钉有助于在最终钢板固定前復位和稳定骨折碎片，并在影像学检查确认復位的同时，支撑骨折对位。随着钢板螺丝使用量的增加，骨钉的使用量也随之增加。

在指骨、掌骨、跖骨、肱骨近端和腕部等需要微创手术和较短手术时间的部位，永久性钢针固定术的应用也日益增加。在这些适应症中，螺纹或光滑表面的钢针可在减少组织剥离和植入体积的情况下提供稳定性。其低轮廓设计可减少对软组织的干扰，并在临床需要时便于取出。

不同地区的采用模式反映了培训、成本和库存取得。在成熟市场，无论是急诊、门诊或择期手术，钢钉都被广泛应用于整体。在许多新兴市场，由于钢钉易于储存、保质期长且消毒简便，因此为各种骨折提供了经济有效的解决方案。因此，即使在医院预算紧张的情况下，钢钉的使用量也保持着稳定成长的趋势。

全球骨钉市场细分摘要

骨钉市场

• 定量覆盖范围：市场规模、企业市场占有率、预测、成长率、销售量、平均售价（ASP）。
• 定性内容：市场成长趋势、阻碍因素、主要竞争对手的竞争和 SWOT 分析、併购、公司简介、产品系列、颠覆性技术、疾病概况。
• 资料来源：对行业领导者的直接访谈、政府医生和监管资料、医院和私人采购资料、进出口记录以及 iData Research 的内部资料库。

市场驱动因素

人口统计因素

人口结构变化导致手术需求持续成长。随着人口老化，骨质疏鬆性脆性骨折的发生率不断上升，而肥胖和糖尿病则进一步增加骨折风险并延缓癒合。大约十分之一的25岁以上成年人患有糖尿病。骨量和骨质下降，加上骨形成延迟，导致骨折发生率增加，需要内固定手术。

老年人髋部、腕部及踝部低能量创伤较常见。许多此类病例需要快速固定和復位。骨钉可作为临时固定的即时可靠选择，并有助于细骨的最终固定。随着全球老年人口比例的增加，骨折手术的数量预计也会增加，这将推动骨钉市场的基本需求成长。

板材和螺丝市场的成长

骨钉与钢板螺丝手术密切相关。外科医生使用骨钉来復位骨碎片、维持骨骼对位并引导钢板固定。随着钢板螺丝在上下肢手术适应症的应用日益广泛，骨钉的需求也随之成长。

这种关係是结构性的。钢板技术的进步并未改变对临时性骨折碎片固定的需求。在多段骨折或骨质疏鬆性骨折中，可能需要使用多枚钢针来维持復位，以便在影像诊断和钻孔导引器/钢板定位过程中进行固定。由于钢针价格低廉，医院通常会储备充足的数量，如果额外的钢针有助于实现解剖復位，外科医生也乐于使用。因此，随着钢板螺丝手术的普及，预计钢针使用量将稳定成长。

扩大应用范围至根治性固定手术

除了临时固定外，钢针的应用范围正在不断扩大，尤其是在手足手术中，可用于永久性固定。在指骨和掌骨骨折中，经皮钢针固定可在最大限度减少软组织损伤的同时，有效控制骨折碎片。在跖骨损伤和某些腕部病例中，钢针可在最大限度减少手术时间和植入体积的同时，提供足够的稳定性。

这项变化是由微创技术、手术时间缩短以及早期復健目标所驱动的。当手术效果相当且再次手术率可接受时，外科医师倾向于选择切口较小、成本较低的手术方法。随着培训项目的不断完善，预计永久性钢针固定术的需求将会增加。

市场限制

成本敏感性

医院和门诊中心正在推行成本控制策略，尤其是在日用药品方面。以骨钉为例，这体现在现货采购量的增加、负责人辅助订购量的减少以及对总价合约的依赖性增强。采购团队会根据单价、无菌保证水准和前置作业时间来比较骨钉，对那些不会影响治疗效果的额外功能则不太接受度。积极的定价策略是赢得竞标的关键，而这种以成本为中心的做法正在限制市场价值的成长。

商品化

骨钉易于製造且使用历史悠久。因此，它们被视为一种大宗商品，平均售价较低。不同品牌之间存在标籤差异，但只要符合品质标准，其性能大致相同。由于非专利的兴起限制了定价权，降低了产品微调的收益，骨钉的价值成长落后于手术量的成长。

平均售价（ASP）下降

产业整体定价趋势也影响骨钉市场。集团采购组织 (GPO)、政府竞标和基于价值的采购模式正日益拉低北美、西欧、中国及其他地区的平均售价 (ASP)。 2021年底中国政策的转变加速了许多整形外科细分市场的平均售价下降。在骨钉等低平均售价细分市场，即使销售量稳定成长，小幅的价格下降也会对整体市场价值造成影响。

市场和数据覆盖范围

• 目标时期：基准年2024年，预测期间2025-2031年，历史资料2021-2023年
• 医疗机构：医院、整形外科创伤中心、门诊手术中心和专门的手足诊所。
• 调查方法：收入模型为销售量乘以平均售价（ASP），并与手术量、购买记录和进出口资料检验。产品组合反映了不同地区和机构对直径、长度、螺纹和尖端类型的偏好。

竞争分析

2024年，DePuy Synthes在全球骨钉市场占据领先地位。该公司在创伤领域的卓越表现使其产品在医院和门诊中心获得了极高的采用率。其丰富的产品组合、稳定的供应以及一体化的托盘系统，使其成为外科医生和供应链团队的首选供应商。预计这一领先地位将在预测期内持续。

史赛克在全球市占率排名第二。史赛克提供全系列的克氏针和斯坦曼氏钉，这些产品通常与钢板、螺丝和髓内器械一同订购。作为此类大宗订单的配套产品，它们的存在巩固了史赛克的市场地位，并随着公司在其他创伤领域的业务增长，进一步推动了市场份额的逐步扩大。

Zimmer Biomet 保持第三的位置，提供直径从 2.0 毫米到 4.8 毫米的标准 Steinmann 钉（包括带套管针或钻石尖端的普通型和螺纹型）。儘管 Zimmer Biomet 仍然是一家主要的跨国供应商，但它再次面临来自区域製造商日益激烈的竞争，这些製造商正积极降低竞标。这种趋势可能会导致该公司未来几年在某些市场的份额略有下降。

规模较小的区域性公司参与政府竞标和私人管道，通常在价格、交货时间和基本品质合规性方面竞争。虽然这些公司本身不会改变全球市场占有率结构，但它们确实加剧了区域市场的价格竞争，加速了该品类的商品化进程。

技术与实务的趋势

• 可选择光滑型或螺纹型：光滑型克氏针是暂时固定的标准选择。螺纹型克氏针则用于需要减少移位和提高固位力的永久性固定。
• 针尖形状的选择：套管针和钻石针尖可满足不同的插入偏好和骨质需求。外科医师可根据皮质骨密度和手术路径选择合适的针尖形状，从而减少刮伤并提高首次穿刺成功率。
• 无菌一次性包装：预灭菌针可减轻再处理负担，并有助于门诊手术中心实现库存标准化。无菌大包装仍然是高通量手术中心的首选。
• 渗透性：在透视下清晰可见对于在小骨和关节周围区域准确放置钢针至关重要。供应商保持渗透性及表面光洁度的一致性，以辅助诊断成像。
• 固位和移位控制：止动针帽、外部夹钳和弯曲技术有助于减少根治性手术期间的针头移位和软组织刺激。
• 工作流程整合：将插销、插销驱动器和导线器组合在一起的托盘和推车简化了创伤室的设置，缩短了周转时间。

地区

本版内容涵盖全球，包括北美、欧洲、亚太地区、拉丁美洲以及中东和非洲。

调查方法附录与简称

目录

图表清单

图表列表

调查方法

全球关税的影响

骨钉市场

• 执行摘要
  • 全球骨钉市场概览
  • 竞争分析
  • 目标区域
• 介绍
• 市场分析与预测
• 驾驶员和约束装置
• 竞争市占率分析

简称

The global bone pin market was valued at $155 million in 2024. The market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.1 percent, reaching $192 million by 2031.

This report covers bone pins used to stabilize bone fragments and to fixate fractures during surgery. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares, and it analyzes procedure trends, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, and technology shifts. Historical data extend to 2021, with forecasts through 2031.

Market Overview

Bone pins are a foundational tool in orthopedic trauma. Their simplicity, broad size range, and compatibility with standard instrumentation make them a mainstay for provisional fixation and for many definitive fixation use cases. Surgeons rely on Kirschner wires (K-wires) and Steinmann pins for temporary fragment control, traction, skeletal stabilization, and final fixation in smaller bones.

Although bone pins are commodity items with low ASPs, the market grows as procedure volumes expand and as surgeons use pins in combination with other fixation hardware. A key dynamic is the strong link between bone pins and plate-and-screw workflows. Pins help reduce and hold fragments before definitive plating, and they support alignment while imaging confirms reduction. As plate and screw usage rises, bone pin units follow.

Definitive fixation with pins is also increasing in phalanges, metacarpals, metatarsals, the proximal humerus, and the wrist, where minimally invasive approaches and shorter procedures are preferred. In these indications, threaded and smooth pins provide stability with limited dissection and limited implant bulk. Their low profile reduces soft-tissue conflict, and removal is straightforward if clinically indicated.

Across regions, adoption patterns reflect training, cost, and inventory access. Mature markets use pins across emergency, outpatient, and elective hand and foot cases. In many emerging markets, pins are a cost-effective solution for a wide range of fractures due to ease of storage, long shelf life, and straightforward sterilization. As a result, unit growth tends to be steady even when hospital budgets are tight.

Global Bone Pin Market Segmentation Summary

Bone Pins Market

• Quantitative coverage: Market size, company shares, forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and ASPs.
• Qualitative coverage: Market growth trends, limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
• Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician and regulatory data, hospital and private purchasing inputs, import and export records, and iData Research's internal database.

Market Drivers

Demographic Factors

Demographic change underpins steady procedural demand. Aging populations experience higher rates of fragility fractures due to osteoporosis, and obesity and diabetes further increase fracture risk and slow healing. About 1 in 10 adults over 25 live with diabetes. Lower bone mass and reduced bone quality, combined with delayed bone formation, translate into more fractures and more fixation events.

In the elderly, low-energy trauma to the hip, wrist, and ankle is common. Many of these cases require rapid stabilization and reduction. Bone pins provide an immediate, reliable option for temporary fixation and assist in definitive fixation for smaller bones. As the share of seniors rises across the world, the volume of fracture procedures is expected to grow, supporting baseline unit growth for pins.

Growth of the Plate and Screw Market

Bone pins are closely integrated with plate-and-screw workflows. Surgeons use pins to reduce fragments, hold alignment, and guide plating. As plate and screw usage expands across upper and lower extremity indications, demand for pins rises in tandem.

This relationship is structural. Even when plate technology advances, the need to temporarily stabilize fragments does not change. In multi-fragment fractures or osteoporotic bone, multiple pins can be used to maintain reduction during imaging and while drill guides and plates are positioned. Because pins are low cost, hospitals stock ample quantities, and surgeons do not hesitate to use extra pins if it helps achieve anatomic reduction. The net effect is stable unit growth aligned with plate-and-screw procedure trends.

Increased Definitive Fixation Application

Beyond provisional use, pins are seeing greater application in definitive fixation, especially in hand and foot surgery. In phalangeal and metacarpal fractures, percutaneous pinning provides fragment control with limited soft-tissue disruption. In metatarsal injuries and select wrist cases, pins offer adequate stability while minimizing operative time and implant bulk.

This shift is driven by minimally invasive techniques, shorter surgeries, and fast rehabilitation goals. When outcomes are comparable and reoperation rates are acceptable, surgeons favor methods that reduce incision size and cost. As training programs reinforce these techniques, definitive pin fixation is expected to add to total unit demand.

Market Limiters

Cost Sensitivity

Hospitals and ambulatory centers pursue cost containment strategies, particularly for commodity items. In bone pins, this translates into off-the-shelf purchases, fewer rep-supported orders, and increased reliance on bulk contracts. Procurement teams compare pins on unit price, sterility assurance level, and lead time, with low tolerance for premium features that do not change outcomes. Aggressive pricing is essential to win tenders, and this emphasis on cost limits market value growth.

Commoditization

Bone pins are simple to manufacture and have a long history of use. As a result, they are treated as commodity products with low ASPs. Label differences exist across brands, but performance is largely comparable when quality standards are met. Growth in generic versions caps pricing power and reduces the payoff for incremental product tweaks, which keeps value growth below procedure growth.

ASP Decreases

Broader industry pricing trends affect bone pins as well. Group purchasing organizations (GPOs), government tenders, and value-based procurement models push ASPs down in North America, Western Europe, China, and increasingly in other regions. China's policy shift at the end of 2021 accelerated ASP declines across many orthopedic categories. In a low-ASP segment like bone pins, even small price reductions can weigh on total market value despite steady unit growth.

Market Coverage and Data Scope

• Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
• Care settings: Hospitals, orthopedic trauma centers, ambulatory surgical centers, and specialty hand and foot clinics.
• Methodology: Revenues modeled as units X ASP, validated against procedure volumes, purchasing records, and import/export data. Unit mix reflects diameter, length, thread, and tip preferences by region and care setting.

Competitive Analysis

DePuy Synthes held the leading share of the global bone pin market in 2024. The company's dominance across trauma categories enables high penetration in hospitals and ambulatory centers. Its broad catalog, consistent availability, and integrated trays keep DePuy Synthes top of mind for surgeons and supply chain teams. Leadership is expected to continue through the forecast period.

Stryker ranked second in global share. Stryker markets a full line of K-wires and Steinmann pins that are often ordered alongside plates, screws, and intramedullary devices. This attachment to larger orders strengthens Stryker's position and supports incremental share gains as the company grows in other trauma segments.

Zimmer Biomet held the third position with Steinmann pins available in standard diameters from 2.0 mm to 4.8 mm, including regular and threaded versions with trocar or diamond points. While Zimmer Biomet remains a key multinational supplier, the company faces renewed competition from regional manufacturers with aggressive pricing in tenders. This dynamic could result in modest share erosion in selected markets over the next few years.

Smaller regional firms participate in government tenders and private channels, typically competing on price, delivery times, and basic quality compliance. These companies do not shift global share structure on their own, but they increase price pressure in local markets and reinforce the category's commoditized nature.

Technology and Practice Trends

• Smooth and threaded options: Smooth K-wires remain standard for provisional fixation. Threaded variants are used when the goal is to reduce migration and improve hold in definitive applications.
• Tip geometry choice: Trocar and diamond points support different insertion preferences and bone qualities. Surgeons match tip design to cortical density and access path to reduce skiving and improve first-pass accuracy.
• Sterile, single-use packaging: Pre-sterilized pins reduce reprocessing burden and help ASCs standardize inventory. Bulk sterile packs remain preferred for high-throughput centers.
• Radiographic visibility: Clear under-fluoro visibility is essential for precise pin placement in small bones and periarticular regions. Vendors maintain consistent radiopacity and surface finish to support imaging.
• Retention and migration control: Stop-pin caps, external clamps, and bend-over techniques help reduce pin migration and soft-tissue irritation in definitive cases.
• Workflow integration: Trays and caddies that pair pins, pin drivers, and wire guides streamline setup and reduce turnover time in trauma rooms.

Geography

This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary

Why This Report

Quantify demand for bone pins by region and care setting through 2031, with unit and ASP splits aligned to procurement patterns.

Benchmark competitors and understand how portfolio breadth, logistics, and attachment to larger trauma orders shape share stability.

Track procedure links between bone pins and plate-and-screw cases to plan inventory, trays, and rep coverage.

Assess pricing pressure from GPOs, tenders, and value-based procurement, and model its impact on realized ASPs.

Identify growth pockets in definitive fixation across hand and foot indications where pins can replace larger implants.

Plan channel strategy for ASCs and outpatient trauma centers where sterile, single-use packaging and fast turnover matter most.

The Global Bone Pin Market Report from iData Research delivers device-level sizing, pricing benchmarks, and company share analysis that commercial teams can use to set price corridors, align tender responses, and forecast attachment rates with plates and screws.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Bone Pin Market

• 11.1 Executive Summary
  • 11.1.1 Global Bone Pin Market Overview
  • 11.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 11.1.3 Regions Included
• 11.2 Introduction
• 11.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
• 11.4 Drivers And Limiters
  • 11.4.1 Market Drivers
  • 11.4.2 Market Limiters
• 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 11-1: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024 & 2031
• Chart 11-2: Bone Pin Units Sold, Global, 2024
• Chart 11-3: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 11-4: Leading Competitors, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 11-1: Bone Pin Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2)
• Figure 11-2: Bone Pin Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2)
• Figure 11-3: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 11-4: Units Sold by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 11-5: Average Selling Price by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$)
• Figure 11-6: Market Value by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 11-7: Leading Competitors, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024