![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1847179
美国软组织修復市场:市场规模、份额和趋势分析(2025-2031 年)Soft Tissue Repair Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis | United States | 2025-2031 | Includes: Achilles Tendon Repair Devices, Rotator Cuff Repair Devices, Shoulder Labrum Repair Devices, and 4 more |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
2024年,美国整形外科软组织修復市场价值超过23亿美元。预计到2031年,该市场将成长至近34亿美元。
本报告涵盖跟腱修復和重组器材、肩迴旋肌修復和重组器材、肩关节软骨修復器材、肱二头肌腱伸展器材、ACL 和 PCL重组产品、半月软骨修復器材和髋关节镜器材。
本报告量化了单位销售额、平均售价、市场价值、成长率和企业市场占有率;分析了医院、门诊手术中心、专科诊所和部分住宅及復健机构(这些机构均使用该设备)的手术量、成长驱动因素和併购以及产品组合变化。
该框架反映了整形外科和运动医学团队如何评估固定结构、移植物、锚钉和关节镜工具包,从而改善治疗效果和手术效率。
市场概览
在美国,软组织修復仍然是整形外科和运动医学的核心重点,需求涵盖肩膀、膝盖、髋部和脚踝,这主要是由于活跃的患者群体希望重返运动所致。
儘管肩迴旋肌修復仍然是最大的收入来源,但随着诊断意识的提高和越来越多的外科医生采用标准化的入路和缝合技术,髋关节镜手术正在迅速发展。在膝关节手术中,前十字韧带(ACL)和后十字韧带(PCL)重组依赖多种固定方法和移植物选择,这些都需根据患者的风险和生活方式量身定制。
保留半月软骨的手术越来越受欢迎,其中半月板切除术半月软骨仍然是最主要的切除术。与肩迴旋肌相比,肱二头肩迴旋肌仍然是一种更具选择性的选择,但其主要目的是为了达到特定的美容和功能切除术。
在每个领域,市场都反映出转向无结缝合和全缝合方法以及更广泛的移植加固选择。
市场驱动因素
体育参与和护理途径:竞技和休閒体育运动有助于保持稳定的手术量,与製造商和专业组织的伙伴关係支持培训、临床研究和程序改进。
多用途锚钉和移植物。缝合锚钉和移植物加固产品可用于多个关节和手术,有助于提高采购效率、提升外科医生技能并实现供应商标准化。
技术和材料的进步。全缝合锚钉和PEEK碳纤维植入的成长反映了在较小的空间内实现牢固固定和可控骨相互作用的需求。选择性手术,例如双排肩迴旋肌修復和增强策略,可以改善固定效果,并帮助合适的患者更快康復。
膝关节重组技术不断发展。可调式环形悬吊钮扣和新一代隧道内装置已被广泛应用。股四头肌腱自体移植作为一种用途广泛的选择,适用于所有年龄层的患者。对于高风险患者,选择性使用外侧关节外腱鞘和内矫正器具旨在降低手术失败率。
髋关节镜手术日益普及。影像技术的进步和对髋臼病变认识的加深,促使手术数量不断增加。髋臼重组和增强手术的早期结果也印证了人们对手术的持续关注。
市场限制
门诊病人手术对成本高度敏感。日间手术中心高度重视成本控制和供应稳定性,这可能会限制使用价格较高的移植材料和填充材料,即使它们在临床上很有吸引力。
报销和政策限制导致医疗机构倾向于采用较少类型的设备。
非手术治疗。许多肌腱和韧带损伤可以透过物理治疗、非类固醇消炎剂和皮质类固醇进行治疗。
手术打包。将多种手术合併在一次手术中进行,例如半月软骨修復和前十字韧带重组,或肩迴旋肌修復和肱二头肌腱延长,可以减少每次手术所需的器械数量,并透过套件标准化降低价格。
现有证据不一。虽然生物强化和原发性修復方案正在探索中,但其适应症仍然有限。这些方案的推广应用取决于明确的疗效数据、一致的操作指南和统一的医保报销机制。
关注领域和数据覆盖范围
定量分析:市场规模、市场占有率、市场预测、成长率、销售量、平均售价、手术例数。
定性内容:成长趋势、市场限制因素、主要竞争对手的竞争分析和 SWOT 分析、併购、公司简介和产品系列、FDA 召回、颠覆性技术、影响需求和手术选择的疾病概述。
时限:基准年 2024 年,预测年 2025-2031 年,历史资料 2021-2023 年。
资料来源:对行业领导者的直接访谈、政府医生和手术资料、监管资料、私人医院资料、进出口资料、iData Research 内部资料库。
方法收入模型是透过单位乘以平均售价 (ASP) 来建立的,透过程序和利用率输入检验,并与相关设备和锚点的设定等级和设施等级采用情况相符。
目标市场及区隔
跟腱修復和重组
器械亚型:移植物、缝合锚钉
肩迴旋肌修復与重组
器械类型:移植物,缝合锚钉。
设备子类型。用于单元分析的无结和有结配置。
肩关节软骨修復
器材类型:PLA、生物复合材料、PEEK、PEEK碳纤维、金属、全缝合线。
设备子类型。用于单元分析的无结和有结配置。
二头肌伸肌手术
器械类型:缝合锚钉、螺丝。
前十字韧带和后十字重组
器械类型。同种异体移植和固定器械类别。
固定方案。可调式环形悬吊钮扣和隧道式内固定装置应用广泛。股四头肌腱自体移植也是一种选择。在高风险病例中,会采用关节外肌腱延长和内固定装置来保护移植腱。
半月软骨修復
器械亚型:植入、缝合式、混合式。
保守趋势。儘管修復手术的切除术相对于切除手术的比例正在上升,但半月软骨仍然很常见。
髋关节镜检查
器械类型:射频探针、香蕉刀片、髋关节入路套件、缝合锚钉、一次性套件、同种异体移植。
采用趋势:关节唇唇撕裂的检测和操作工具的改进促进了成长。
舟状韧带修復
我们将对这个市场进行定性分析。
竞争分析
2024 年,美国整形外科软组织和运动医学市场将由 Arthrex 引领,该公司在旋转肌群重建、前十字韧带重组和后十字韧带重组方面拥有强大的市场地位,并在半月软骨修復和髋关节镜手术方面提供广泛的服务。
史密斯和内普公司凭藉其在半月软骨修復方面的优势,在肩部、ACL 或 PCL 以及髋部手术中占据前三名,获得了第二大的市场份额。
DePuy Synthes 在肩迴旋肌和肩关节软骨方面表现出色,在膝关节和髋关节方面也保持了平衡,因此排名第三。
其他供应商则在特定的细分市场和环境中竞争。这是一个充满活力的领域,其可靠的产品系列、培训支援和高效的套件备受青睐,这些工具包都能帮助团队以可预测性和更低的变异性执行操作流程。
科技与临床趋势
无结全缝线固定。充分利用肩部和髋部,可减少占地面积并控制张力。
加固和增强。对于某些患者和手术,合成移植物和补片可以增强修復强度。
标准化套件。医院和门诊手术中心将采用标准化套件和一次性用品,以缩短准备时间、管理库存并统一采购。
关节镜手术流程。更完善的入路工具、射频消融管理和缝合方法有助于实现可预测的手术流程。
治疗地点
这包括产品在医院、门诊手术中心、专科诊所及相关復健机构或家庭环境中的使用或计费情况。向门诊病人护理的转变仍在继续,这将影响定价、套件设计和供应商服务需求。
地区
本期重点关注美国。
有关术语和建模,请参阅调查方法附录和简称。
美国整形外科软组织修復领域中成长最快的、最具成长潜力的细分市场有哪些?肩部、膝部、髋部和跟腱修復领域在预测期内将如何促进成长?
该市场与美国整体经济以及医院和门诊手术中心的运作(包括招聘、排班、植入标准化和供应链)有何关係?
未来哪些因素将影响市场走向,包括报销方式的变化、ASC 转型速度、增强和加固的作用,以及向无结缝合和全缝合固定方式的转变?
在肩迴旋肌、关节唇、ACL/PCL、半月软骨、肱二头肌、髋关节和跟腱手术中,哪些技术和材料越来越受欢迎?这些选择对单位数量、平均服务价格和手术时间有何影响?
ACL 和 PCL重组策略是如何演变的,包括使用可调节环扣、隧道内固定、股四头肌腱自体移植以及选择性辅助手段,如外侧关节外肌腱延伸和内部支架结构?
半月软骨保存的发展轨迹是什么?修復与切除之间的选择将如何影响产品需求和定价?
随着影像技术、关节唇修復和重组的进步,髋关节镜手术在整体发展格局中扮演着怎样的角色?
商业团队如何针对成本敏感的门诊手术中心环境进行规划,并使套件设计、价格分布和服务模式与门诊病人限制保持一致?
哪些证据缺口和政策问题正在减缓高端设备和生物增强技术的普及?产品策略应该如何应对这些问题?
供应商应如何定位训练和教育,以帮助外科医师和手术室团队减少差异,并加速安全地采用新的器械和手术流程?
iData Researchの美国整形外科软部组织修復市场レポートでは、手技を意识したモデル、企业市场占有率分析、価格と単位の详细、手技の选択肢と装置需要を対応させた调査対象により、これらの疑问にお答えします。
该报告可用于按类别量化机会、规划产品蓝图、设定定价和合约目标,以及优先考虑可提高不同环境下一致性的培训和支援计画。
图表清单
图表列表
美国整形外科软组织修復市场概览
竞争分析
新兴市场与技术
市场趋势
市场趋势
流程分段
待调查的程式码
市场区隔
关键分析更新
版本历史记录
调查方法
全球关税的影响
美国整形外科软组织修復市场概览
手术次数
跟腱修復与重组市场
肩迴旋肌修復与重组市场
肩关节软骨修復市场
二头肌肌腱固定术市场
ACL/PCL重组市场
半月软骨修復市场
髋关节镜市场
The U.S. orthopedic soft tissue repair market was valued at over $2.3 billion in 2024. The market is expected to grow to reach nearly $3.4 billion by 2031.
This report covers Achilles tendon repair and reconstruction devices, rotator cuff repair and reconstruction devices, shoulder labrum repair devices, biceps tenodesis devices, ACL and PCL reconstruction products, meniscal repair devices, and hip arthroscopy devices.
It quantifies units, average selling prices, market values, growth rates, and company shares, and analyzes procedure volumes, growth drivers and limiters, mergers and acquisitions, and portfolio changes across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, specialty clinics, and select home or rehab settings where device use applies.
The framework reflects how orthopedic and sports medicine teams evaluate fixation constructs, grafts, anchors, and arthroscopic tool sets that improve outcomes and surgical efficiency.
Market Overview
Soft tissue repair remains a core focus in U.S. orthopedic and sports medicine practice. Demand is broad across shoulder, knee, hip, and foot and ankle procedures and is supported by an active patient population that seeks to return to activity.
Rotator cuff repair remains the largest revenue driver, while hip arthroscopy is growing faster as diagnostic awareness increases and more surgeons adopt consistent access and closure techniques. In knee procedures, ACL and PCL reconstruction continue to rely on diverse fixation methods and graft choices that can be matched to patient risk and lifestyle.
Meniscal preservation is gaining favor, although meniscectomy still accounts for a large share of procedures. Biceps tenodesis remains a more selective choice compared with tenotomy but is supported by specific cosmetic and functional goals.
Across segments, the market reflects ongoing movement toward knotless and all-suture approaches and broader options in graft reinforcement.
Market Drivers
Sports participation and care pathways. Competitive and recreational sports contribute to steady procedure volumes, and partnerships between manufacturers and professional organizations support training, clinical studies, and technique refinement.
Multi-use anchors and grafts. Suture anchors and graft reinforcement products can be used across multiple joints and procedures, which supports procurement efficiency, surgeon familiarity, and vendor standardization.
Technique and material advances. Growth in all-suture anchors and PEEK carbon fiber implants reflects a search for secure fixation with smaller footprints and controlled bone interaction. Technique choices such as double-row rotator cuff repair and augmentation strategies can improve fixation and support faster rehabilitation in appropriate patients.
Evolving knee reconstruction practice. Adjustable-loop suspensory buttons and next-generation intratunnel devices are widely used. Quadriceps tendon autograft has expanded as a versatile option across age groups. In higher-risk patients, selective use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis and internal brace constructs aims to lower failure.
Growing adoption of hip arthroscopy. Improved imaging and better understanding of labral pathology are lifting volumes. Early results from labral reconstruction and augmentation support continued interest.
Market Limiters
Cost sensitivity in outpatient settings. Ambulatory surgery centers place a high priority on cost control and supply predictability. This can limit uptake of higher cost grafts or reinforcement materials even when clinically attractive.
Reimbursement and policy constraints. Payment levels do not always reward the use of advanced devices or combined approaches, which can lead facilities to standardize around fewer device types.
Non-surgical management. Many tendon and ligament injuries can be managed with therapy, NSAIDs, and corticosteroids, which delays or displaces surgery for a portion of patients.
Bundled procedures. Combining procedures in one session, such as meniscal repair with ACL reconstruction or rotator cuff repair with biceps tenodesis, can reduce device units per episode and can put pressure on pricing through kit standardization.
Evidence variability. While biologic augmentation and primary repair solutions are under investigation, they remain limited to narrow indications. Adoption depends on clear outcome data, consistent technique guidance, and aligned reimbursement.
Market Coverage and Data Scope
Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, average selling prices, and procedure numbers.
Qualitative coverage. Growth trends, market limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, FDA recalls, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews that shape demand and procedure selection.
Time frame. Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician and procedure data, regulatory data, hospital private data, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.
Method note. Revenue is modeled from units multiplied by ASP, validated with procedure and utilization inputs, and checked against setting-level and facility-level adoption for the relevant devices and anchors.
Markets Covered and Segmentation
Achilles Tendon Repair and Reconstruction
Device type. Graft, suture anchor.
Rotator Cuff Repair and Reconstruction
Device type. Graft, suture anchor.
Device subtype. Knotless and knotted configurations for unit analysis.
Shoulder Labrum Repair
Device type. PLA, biocomposite, PEEK, PEEK carbon fiber, metal, all-suture.
Device subtype. Knotless and knotted configurations for unit analysis.
Biceps Tenodesis
Device type. Suture anchor, screw.
ACL and PCL Reconstruction
Device type. Allograft and fixation device categories.
Fixation landscape. Adjustable-loop suspensory buttons and intratunnel devices are widely used. Quadriceps tendon autograft is a growing choice. In higher risk cases, extra-articular tenodesis and internal brace constructs may be used to support graft protection.
Meniscal Repair
Device type. Implant, suture, and hybrid.
Preservation trend. Repair rates are increasing relative to removal, but meniscectomy remains common.
Hip Arthroscopy
Device type. Radiofrequency probe, banana blade, hip access kit, suture anchor, disposable kit, allograft.
Adoption trend. Detection of labral tears and refinement of access tools support growth.
Scapholunate Ligament Repair
This market is discussed qualitatively.
Competitive Analysis
Arthrex led the U.S. orthopedic soft tissue and sports medicine market in 2024 with strong presence in rotator cuff and ACL or PCL reconstruction and broad coverage in meniscal repair and hip arthroscopy.
Smith & Nephew held the second-largest share with strength in meniscal repair and top three positions in shoulder, ACL or PCL, and hip segments.
DePuy Synthes ranked third with strong participation in rotator cuff and shoulder labrum and balanced positions in knee and hip.
Other suppliers compete in selected niches or settings. The field is active and rewards dependable portfolios, training support, and efficient kits that help teams run predictable, low-variance procedures.
Technology and Practice Trends
Knotless and all-suture fixation. Wider use across shoulder and hip supports smaller footprints and controlled tensioning.
Reinforcement and augmentation. Synthetic grafts and patches can add repair strength in selected patients and techniques.
Standardized kits. Hospitals and ASCs adopt kits and disposable sets that shorten setup, help control inventory, and align with purchasing.
Arthroscopic workflow. Better access tools, RF management, and closure methods drive predictable case flow.
Care Settings
Coverage includes hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, specialty clinics, and relevant post-acute or home settings where products are used or charged. The shift to outpatient care continues and influences pricing, kit design, and vendor service needs.
Geography
This edition covers the United States.
Methodology Appendix and Acronym Glossary for terminology and modeling.
Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within U.S. orthopedic soft tissue repair and how do shoulder, knee, hip, and Achilles segments contribute to growth over the forecast period.
How does the market relate to the broader U.S. economy and to hospital and ASC operations, including hiring, scheduling, implant standardization, and supply chain.
What forces will shape the market going forward, including changes in reimbursement, the pace of ASC migration, the role of reinforcement and augmentation, and the shift toward knotless and all-suture fixation.
Which techniques and materials are gaining traction in rotator cuff, labrum, ACL or PCL, meniscal, biceps, hip, and Achilles procedures and how do those choices affect units, ASPs, and procedural time.
How are ACL and PCL reconstruction strategies evolving, including the use of adjustable-loop buttons, intratunnel fixation, quadriceps tendon autograft, and selective adjuncts such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis and internal brace constructs.
What is the trajectory for meniscal preservation, and how might repair versus removal choices shape product demand and pricing.
Where does hip arthroscopy fit within the overall growth picture, given improved imaging, labral repair, and reconstruction practices.
How can commercial teams plan for cost sensitive ASC environments and align kit designs, price points, and service models with outpatient constraints.
What evidence gaps or policy issues slow adoption of premium devices or biologic augmentation and how should product strategy respond.
How should suppliers position training and education so that surgeons and OR teams can reduce variation and speed safe adoption of new devices or techniques.
The U.S. orthopedic soft tissue repair market report from iData Research answers these questions with procedure aware models, company share analysis, pricing and unit detail, and coverage that maps technique choices to device demand.
Use it to quantify opportunity by category, plan product roadmaps, set pricing and contracting targets, and prioritize training and support programs that improve consistency across settings.
Table Of Contents
List Of Figures
List Of Charts
U.S. Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Emerging Markets And Technologies
Market Developments
Market Trends
Procedure Segmentation
Procedure Codes Investigated
Market Segmentation
Key Analysis Updates
Version History
Research Methodology
Impact Of Global Tariffs
U.S. Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Overview
Procedure Numbers
Achilles Tendon Repair & Reconstruction Market
Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Market
Shoulder Labrum Repair Market
Biceps Tenodesis Market
Acl/Pcl Reconstruction Market
Meniscal Repair Market
Hip Arthroscopy Market