日本牙科植入市场：市场规模、份额和趋势分析（2025-2031年）

2024年日本人工植牙和最终支台齿市场价值超过2.52亿美元，预计到2031年将成长到超过3.07亿美元。

本报告涵盖植入、最终支台齿、治疗计画软体和手术范本。

量化目标包括销售量、平均售价、市场规模、成长率和企业市场占有率。

定性部分涵盖市场驱动因素和限制因素、近期併购、公司简介、产品系列以及在私人诊所、集团诊所、大学医院和实验室中的竞争定位。

日本的一个关键趋势是不断向数位化转型。

锥状射束CT、口内扫描、设计软体以及内部或外包铣床的广泛应用，推动了 CAD 或 CAM支台齿的强劲成长。

随着扫描器和铣床的成本持续下降，工作流程也日益标准化，越来越多的牙科诊所和实验室可能会采用这些工具。

预计这种可及性的提高将在整个预测期内推动对 CAD/CAM支台齿的需求，从而重塑常规植入治疗中的修復选择。

市场概览

日本植入市场正处于人口老化、对功能性和美观性的高期望以及对数位化工作流程的浓厚兴趣的十字路口。

核心产品是植入和连接植体与牙冠或义齿的最终支台齿。围绕着这个核心产品，一套数位化解决方案正在不断扩展，以支持治疗方案的发展和实施。诊所依赖基于锥状束CT（CBCT）的治疗方案来可视化骨质和神经位置，许多病例也使用手术范本将方案转化为精准的植入。这些工具能够减少诊疗时间，提高首次植入的准确性，并减少后续调整，因此在专科医生和全科医生中都得到了广泛应用。

需求按价格分布和病例复杂程度进行细分：高端植入在全牙弓和复杂适应症中仍然很重要，因为广泛的假体目录、先进的表面处理和悠久的临床历史都受到重视。

经济型植入通常用于单颗牙齿或短跨度病例，增加植体的数量，但降低整体平均植体费用。

同时，CAD 或 CAM支台齿越来越受欢迎，诊所和实验室透过数位化设计和铣床，需要精确的牙龈轮廓和组织控制。

市场驱动因素

辅助技术的进步。植入技术的蓬勃发展促使锥形束CT扫描仪和规划软体得到广泛应用。高解析度三维模型使临床医生能够评估骨骼密度和结构，并根据关键解剖结构规划植入位置。电脑辅助手术有助于将规划转化为手术范本，从而控制角度、深度和入路点。这些措施提高了可靠性，减少了变异性，并扩大了植入治疗方案的选择范围。

人们对美观性的需求日益增长。植入被广泛认为是单颗牙齿缺失的最佳美观解决方案，因为它可以保护邻牙，并维持牙龈乳头和软组织的轮廓。人们对美观牙科的日益关注，促使更多人选择植入而非牙桥。在适当的病例中，诸如单阶段或即时负重等快速治疗方案，能够缩短治疗时间，进一步提升患者的就医体验。

人工植牙技术和培训的进步 过去，全科医生面临的障碍包括认为植牙手术复杂且需要大量培训。如今，供应商正致力于开发使用者友善的系统、清晰的工作流程以及能够缩短手术时间和学习曲线的培训专案。植入设计的进步和标准化套件的普及，也促成了过去十年平均成功率的提高。

数位化带来的推动作用。随着扫描和铣床成本的下降，以及越来越多的诊所与数位化实验室合作，CAD/CAM支台齿正成为可行的选择，并被广泛应用。即使植入ASP面临低价和折扣品牌的压力，这一趋势仍将支撑支台齿收入的成长。

市场限制

口腔健康状况的改善。口腔健康状况的改善减少了需要复杂修復的患者人数。这种改善或许能够缓解人口老化所带来的需求，尤其对于需要进行全面全口修復的无牙颚患者而言更是如此。

价格敏感度和平均售价压缩。在某些适应症中，高端植入正被性价比更高的品牌和折扣品牌蚕食市场份额。这种转变虽然提高了销量，但却降低了整体平均售价。即使是高端品牌也开始提供针对性的折扣，以适应当地的预算。

假冒产品。一些廉价品牌冒充高端产品，声称其生物等效性与优质产品相当，虽然顾客群规模不大，但却十分忠诚。这些假冒产品在价格上竞争，导致采购和零件相容性问题更加复杂，并加剧了价格压力。

目标市场及区隔

人工植牙市场

类型：高级、超值、折扣。

形状：平行壁，锥形。

材质：钛、陶瓷或氧化锆。

手术类型：单阶段、双阶段、即时负重。

连接类型：内部连接、外部连接、整合。

用途（数量分析）：单颗牙齿修復、多牙桥部分牙弓固定、多牙桥全牙弓固定、义齿固定。

终末支台齿市场

细分市场：库存铸件、客製化铸件、CAD 或 CAM。

材质：钛、陶瓷或氧化锆、黄金。

类型：黏接式、螺丝固位式、义齿固位式。

仪器套件

治疗计画软体

手术范本

目标市场和数据范围

量化指标：市场规模、市场占有率、市场预测、成长率、销售量、平均售价。

定性通报：成长驱动因素和限制因素、主要竞争对手的竞争分析和 SWOT 分析、併购、公司简介和产品系列、相关监管更新、颠覆性技术、人口统计资料。

时限：基准年 2024 年，预测年 2025-2031 年，历史资料 2021-2024 年。

资料来源：与产业领导者的直接访谈、政府和监管资料、诊所和实验室的输入、进出口资料、iData Research 内部资料库。

方法论：收入模型为单位 x 平均售价，并根据手术量、数位化采用率以及高端、经济和折扣细分市场的价格等级检验。

竞争分析

2024年，士卓曼集团在植入和支台齿领域占绝对优势。该公司的优势在于其品牌知名度、悠久的临床经验和丰富的修復产品目录。士卓曼旗下子公司Neodent在经济型市场也表现出色，透过涵盖价格分布和经济型价格分布，进一步巩固了集团的整体市场地位。持续的策略性收购拓展了数位化规划和修復组件的业务范围。

Envista在Nobel Biocare和植入 Direct的综合排名中排名第二。 Envista整体销售植入、支台齿和治疗计画软体，但并非任何细分市场的绝对领导者。该公司策略性地实现了差异化和多元化发展，其中约40%的收入来自植入，这得益于人口老化、数位化和集团诊所的成长。

京瓷（原名JMM）在2024年排名第三，专注于高性价比市场。公司产品组合包括锥形和平行式Phinesia Relios、Phinesia、EMINEO、POI和POI EX系统，以及适用于黏合式、螺丝固位式、覆盖式义齿和CAD/CAM修復体的各种支台齿选择。 2025年5月，公司宣布将于2025年10月1日将医疗业务分拆为京瓷医疗株式会社，以加强其在牙科和医疗保健领域的专注。此举可望加快植入和器械领域的决策和产品组合开发。

其他供应商则在特定细分市场中竞争，专注于特定几何形状、氧化锆材质、简易套件和强大的在地化服务。成功因素包括种类齐全的义肢组件、数位整合、教育培训计画以及可靠的供应链。

科技与临床趋势

引导式果冻和数位化工作流程。锥形束CT（CBCT）、规划软体和导板製作减少了计画与实际植入位置之间的差异。诊所正在采用扫描体并与实验室合作，以设计牙龈轮廓和咬合关係。这推动了对与软组织轮廓和植入路径相匹配的CAD或CAM支台齿的需求。

内连接和锥形设计。内连接和锥形体在日本很受欢迎，因为它们具有良好的稳定性和修復体的灵活性。这些设计在合适的病例中支持即时或早期负重，并且与现代支台齿系统相容。

材料选择。钛因其强度高和骨整合性好而成为主流材料。氧化锆植入和支台齿则满足前牙美学需求和对无金属材料的偏好。

即时负重方案。如果初期稳定性良好且咬合设计合理，即时负重可以缩短修復期。规划软体在选择负重方向、植入位置和支台齿发挥核心作用。

标准支台齿和CAD/CAM支台齿。标准支台齿适用于成本较低的常规病例。当软组织处理、角度和牙龈排列至关重要，且诊所和技工室已使用扫描器和铣床时，CAD/CAM支台齿可扩大市场份额。

采购和定价

临床评估将评估设备的成本、椅位使用时间、重复使用率和病患满意度。

经济型植入已取得显着成效，并在预算有限的常规单颗牙齿修復和短跨度修復中占据越来越大的市场份额。而高端种植系统则更适用于复杂病例、全口种植方案以及需要深度修復覆盖和较长临床病史的情况。

支台齿的选择取决于修復目标。黏接式修復体成本可能较低，但需要精心管理黏合剂。螺丝固位式支台齿具有极佳的可拆卸性，是许多数位化工作流程的首选。

虽然 CAD 或 CAM支台齿的单价更高，但它们可以减少调整和返工，从而在整个治疗过程中提高整体经济效益。

由于具有竞争力的价值体系数量不断增加以及模仿品牌的出现，ASP 正面临持续的压缩。

高端和高性价比品牌透过提供针对性的折扣、教育培训以及将植体与规划许可、扫描体和支台齿台库捆绑植入的套餐来应对市场。最终结果是，市场竞争更加激烈，治疗总成本和治疗结果的可预测性成为消费者决策的关键因素。

治疗环境与工作流程

在日本，大多数植入治疗都在私人牙科诊所进行，复杂的病例会被转诊给专家或大学中心。

实验室在支台齿的选择和最终修復体的品质方面起着至关重要的作用。随着数位化工具的兴起，牙科诊所开始在诊所内进行扫描，并将文件共用给使用CAD或CAM技术设计和製作支台齿和牙冠的实验室。

虽然有些椅旁铣床是可行的，但大多数客製化支台齿都是透过合作实验室製作的，在那里我们控製材料、牙龈设计和表面处理，以获得一致的软组织效果。

按类别分類的市场动态

人工植牙。常规病例的治疗方案正逐渐转向价值导向型。对于复杂或全口种植病例，高端植入仍占据主导地位。钛金属植体占据主导地位，而氧化锆植体则主要应用于美学领域。

最终支台齿：在简单的病例中，钛合金标准支台齿仍然很受欢迎。对于旧有系统或需要倾斜角度的病例，客製化铸造基台仍然是一种可行的选择。随着扫描和铣床的进步，CAD 或 CAM支台齿越来越受欢迎，尤其是在组织准备和牙龈控制至关重要的情况下。

治疗计划软体。越来越多的诊所采用锥形束CT（CBCT）进行治疗计划，以寻求更清晰的工作流程和更低的治疗差异性。该软体的许可可以与植入线和导板製造服务捆绑销售。

手术范本的需求随着手术规划软体的普及而成长。导板可以缩短手术时间，并实现标准化的治疗效果，因此在全科医疗中越来越受欢迎。

地区

本期聚焦日本。

一份 Excel 资料补充文件，按细分市场列出了市场价格、销售和平均售价。

为什么要写这份报告？

日本植入和最终支台齿市场中最大、成长最快的机会在哪里？到 2031 年，高端、价值和折扣系统的组合将如何影响收入？

数位化将如何改变您的日常工作流程？随着CBCT和扫描技术的普及，CAD/CAM支台齿、手术范本和规划授权将如何变得更普遍？

哪些支台齿形式将获得市场占有率？标准型、客製化铸造型、CAD 或 CAM 型基地台如何平衡成本、紧急控制和可回收性？

口腔卫生改善将如何影响手术量的成长？哪些患者群体会因美观和长期价值的需求而受到抵销？

考虑到价值型产品的获利能力以及折扣产品中仿冒品牌的存在，植入和支台齿的合理价格分布是多少？

牙医诊所应该如何制定修復策略，包括黏接固位和螺丝固位设计、前牙美观和后牙负重的材料选择，以及扫描体和资料库的作用？

可以采取哪些措施来减少返工和就诊时间，包括扫描通讯协定、导板设计、支台齿选择以及数位化病例的实验室协调？

iDataResearch 的《日本人工植牙和最终支台齿牙市场》报告透过对细分市场和价格分布模型、企业市场占有率分析以及数位化和手术工作流程的实用分析，回答了这些问题。

利用这份报告，您可以了解各类别的需求，规划产品蓝图，使定价符合当地预期，并制定培训和服务计划，以减少差异和返工。

目录

图表清单

图表列表

调查方法

全球关税的影响

日本人工植牙和最终支台齿市场

• 执行摘要
  • 日本人工植牙和最终支台齿市场概览
  • 竞争分析
  • 市场趋势
  • 终端用户分析
  • 市场区隔
• 介绍
  • 人工植牙
  • 终点码头
  • 人工植牙器械套件
  • 治疗计划软体市场
  • 手术导板
• 数量分析和最终用户分析
  • 人工植牙最终用户
  • 人工植牙数量分析
• 外汇
• 市场概览
• 市场分析与预测
  • 人工植牙市场
  • 最终码头市场
  • 人工植牙植牙器材套件市场
  • 治疗计划软体市场
  • 手术导板市场
• 驾驶员和约束装置
• 竞争市占率分析
  • 人工植牙市场竞争市场占有率分析
  • 终末支台齿市场竞争市占率分析
  • 人工植牙植牙套件市场竞争市占率分析
  • 治疗计画软体市场竞争格局分析
  • 手术范本市场竞争格局分析

简称

The Japan dental implant and final abutment market was valued at over 252 million dollars in 2024. The market is projected to grow to over 307 million dollars by 2031.

This report suite covers dental implants, final abutments, treatment planning software, and surgical guides.

Quantitative coverage includes unit sales, average selling prices, market size, growth rates, and company shares.

Qualitative coverage includes market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, and competitive positioning across private clinics, group practices, university hospitals, and laboratories.

A key trend in Japan is the ongoing shift toward digitization.

The spread of cone beam CT, intraoral scanning, design software, and in-house or outsourced milling is fueling strong growth in CAD or CAM abutments.

As scanner and mill costs continue to decline and as workflows standardize, more clinics and labs will adopt these tools.

This wider access is expected to lift demand for CAD or CAM abutments throughout the forecast period and to reshape prosthetic choices in everyday implant care.

Market Overview

Japan's implant market sits at the intersection of aging demographics, high expectations for function and aesthetics, and strong interest in digital workflows.

The core products are the implant fixture and the final abutment that links the fixture to the crown or denture. Around this core, a growing digital stack supports planning and delivery. Clinics rely on CBCT-based treatment planning to visualize bone quality and nerve position, and many cases use surgical guides to translate the plan into accurate placement. These tools shorten chair time, improve confidence in first-time accuracy, and reduce downstream adjustments, which supports adoption at both specialist and general practice levels.

Demand is segmented by price tier and by case complexity. Premium implants remain important in full arch and complex indications, where a wide prosthetic catalogue, advanced surface treatments, and long clinical histories are valued.

Value implants are used more frequently in straightforward single-tooth and short span cases, which pushes unit volume but pressures overall ASPs.

On the abutment side, stock titanium remains common in routine procedures, while CAD or CAM abutments gain share where clinics and labs run digital design and milling and need precise emergence profiles and tissue management.

Market Drivers

Improved supporting technology. The growth of implant dentistry has driven adoption of CBCT scanners and planning software. High-resolution 3D models allow clinicians to assess bone density and structure and to plan implant position relative to critical anatomy. Computer-guided surgery converts plans into surgical guides that help control angulation, depth, and entry points. Together these steps increase confidence, reduce variability, and support broader indications for implant therapy.

Demand for improved aesthetics. Implants are widely regarded as the best aesthetic solution for single-tooth replacement, since they preserve adjacent teeth and can maintain papillae and soft tissue contours. Rising interest in cosmetic dentistry supports implant selection over bridges. Fast protocols, such as one-stage or immediate loading in suitable cases, further improve the patient experience by reducing elapsed treatment time.

Improved dental implant technology and training. Historical barriers for general practitioners included perceptions of complexity and the need for extensive training. Vendors now focus on user-friendly systems, clearer workflows, and training programs that reduce procedure time and learning curves. Implant design advances and standardized kits have contributed to higher average success rates over the last decade.

Digitization pull-through. As scanning and milling costs decline and as more clinics partner with digital labs, CAD or CAM abutments become a practical daily choice. This trend supports growth in abutment revenue even when implant ASPs face pressure from value and discount brands.

Market Limiters

Improvements in dental health. Better oral health reduces the pool of complex restorative candidates. This improvement can offset the demand linked to an aging population, especially in edentulous cases that would otherwise support large full-arch treatments.

Price sensitivity and ASP compression. Premium implants are losing share to value and discount brands in certain indications. The shift raises unit volumes but lowers overall ASPs. Even premium brands use targeted discounting to match local budgets.

Imitation products. Discount brands that present themselves as bioequivalent to premium systems attract a modest but persistent customer base. These imitation products compete on price and complicate procurement and part compatibility, reinforcing downward pressure on pricing.

Markets Covered and Segmentation

Dental Implant Market

Type. Premium, value, discount.

Shape. Parallel wall, tapered.

Material. Titanium, ceramic or zirconia.

Procedure type. One-stage surgery, two-stage surgery, immediate loading.

Connection type. Internal connection, external connection, one-piece.

Application (unit analysis). Single-tooth replacement, multi-tooth bridge partial arch securement, multi-tooth bridge full arch securement, denture securement.

Final Abutment Market

Segment. Stock, custom cast, CAD or CAM.

Material. Titanium, ceramic or zirconia, gold.

Type. Cement-retained, screw-retained, denture retaining.

Instrument Kit

Treatment Planning Software

Surgical Guide

Market Coverage and Data Scope

Quantitative coverage. Market size, market shares, market forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and average selling prices.

Qualitative coverage. Growth drivers and limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles and product portfolios, regulatory updates where relevant, disruptive technologies, and demographic context.

Time frame. Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2024.

Data sources. Primary interviews with industry leaders, government and regulatory data, clinic and laboratory inputs, import and export data, and the iData Research internal database.

Method note. Revenues are modeled as units X ASP, validated against procedure volumes, digital adoption rates, and price tiers across premium, value, and discount segments.

Competitive Analysis

Straumann Group was the strongest competitor in 2024 across implants and abutments. The company benefits from brand recognition, a long clinical track record, and a broad prosthetic catalogue. Neodent, a Straumann subsidiary, has also outperformed the market in the value segment, which strengthens the group's overall position by covering both premium and value price points. Ongoing strategic acquisitions support reach across digital planning and restorative components.

Envista ranked second overall through Nobel Biocare and Implant Direct. Envista sells across implants, abutments, and treatment planning software, but is not the clear leader in any single category. The company is strategically differentiated and well diversified, with about 40 percent of revenue from implants, reinforced by aging demographics, digitization, and growth in group practices.

KYOCERA (formerly JMM) ranked third in 2024 and focuses on the value segment. Its portfolio includes FINESIA Relios, FINESIA, EMINEO, POI, and POI EX systems in tapered and parallel forms, along with broad abutment options for cement-retained, screw-retained, overdenture, and CAD or CAM restorations. The company announced in May 2025 the spin-off of its medical business into Kyocera Medical Corporation, effective October 1, 2025, to sharpen its focus on dental and healthcare. This structure is expected to support faster decision-making and portfolio development in implants and instruments.

Other suppliers compete in selected niches, with emphasis on specific geometries, zirconia options, simplified kits, and strong local service. Success factors include breadth of prosthetic parts, digital integrations, education programs, and reliable supply chains.

Technology and Practice Trends

Guided surgery and digital workflows. CBCT, planning software, and guide production reduce deviation between plan and placement. Clinics adopt scan bodies and integrate with labs to design emergence profiles and occlusion. This raises demand for CAD or CAM abutments that match soft tissue contours and path of insertion.

Internal connections and tapered designs. Internal connections and tapered bodies are common in Japan due to primary stability and prosthetic flexibility. These designs support immediate or early loading in appropriate cases and fit well with modern abutment systems.

Material choices. Titanium dominates for strength and osseointegration. Zirconia implants and abutments serve an anterior aesthetics niche and metal-free preferences.

Immediate loading protocols. When primary stability is achieved and occlusion is designed carefully, immediate loading shortens the restorative timeline. Planning software plays a central role in load direction, implant position, and abutment selection.

Stock versus CAD or CAM abutments. Stock abutments support routine cases at lower cost. CAD or CAM abutments gain share where soft tissue management, angulation, and emergence alignment are critical, and where clinics and labs already use scanners and mills.

Procurement and Pricing Dynamics

Clinics evaluate device price, chair time, remake rates, and patient satisfaction.

Value implants win share in routine single-tooth and short span indications where outcomes are proven and budgets are tight. Premium systems dominate in complex cases, full arch protocols, and settings that need a deep prosthetic range and long clinical histories.

Abutment choice depends on restoration goals. Cement-retained designs can lower cost but require careful cement control. Screw-retained designs support retrievability and are preferred in many digital workflows.

CAD or CAM abutments carry higher unit prices but can reduce adjustments and remakes, which improves total economics over the course of care.

ASPs face steady compression due to the larger number of capable value systems and the presence of imitation brands.

Premium and value leaders respond with focused discounting, education, and bundles that link implants to planning licences, scan bodies, and abutment libraries. The net effect is a more competitive corridor where total cost of treatment and predictability of outcomes drive decisions.

Care Settings and Workflows

Most implant procedures in Japan take place in private dental clinics, with referrals to specialists and university centers for complex cases.

Laboratories are central to abutment selection and final restoration quality. As digital tools spread, clinics scan in-house and share files with labs that design and mill CAD or CAM abutments and crowns.

Some chairside milling exists, but most custom abutments run through partner labs that manage materials, emergence design, and finishing for consistent soft tissue outcomes.

Market Dynamics by Category

Dental implants. Unit growth is steady, with mix moving toward value systems in routine cases. Premium implants remain strong in complex and full arch indications. Titanium dominates, while zirconia serves a smaller aesthetics-driven niche.

Final abutments. Stock titanium abutments remain common for simple cases. Custom cast is stable where legacy systems and angulations require it. CAD or CAM abutments are expanding with the spread of scanning and milling, especially where tissue shaping and emergence control matter.

Treatment planning software. Adoption tracks with CBCT use and with clinics that want guided workflows and lower variability. Licences can be bundled with implant lines or guide production services.

Surgical guides. Demand grows with planning software. Guides lower chair time and help standardize outcomes, which supports wider adoption at the general practice level.

Geography

This edition covers Japan.

Excel Data Supplement with market values, units, and ASPs by segment.

Why This Report

Where is the largest and fastest growing opportunity within Japan's implant and final abutment market, and how will the mix of premium, value, and discount systems shape revenue through 2031.

How will digitization change everyday workflows, and what is the expected pull-through for CAD or CAM abutments, surgical guides, and planning licences as CBCT and scanning spread.

Which abutment formats will gain share, and how will stock, custom cast, and CAD or CAM options balance cost, emergence control, and retrievability.

How will improvements in oral health affect procedure growth, and which patient segments will offset that effect through demand for aesthetics and long-term value.

What price corridors are realistic for implants and abutments given value segment gains and the presence of imitation brands in the discount tier.

How should clinics plan restoration strategies, including cement-retained versus screw-retained designs, material choice for anterior aesthetics versus posterior loading, and the role of scan bodies and libraries.

What steps reduce remakes and chair time, including scanning protocols, guide design, abutment selection, and lab coordination in digital cases.

The Japan Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market report from iData Research answers these questions with segment and price-tier models, company share analysis, and practical coverage of digital and surgical workflows.

Use it to size demand by category, plan product roadmaps, align pricing with local expectations, and build training and service programs that reduce variability and remakes.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Table Of Contents

List Of Figures

List Of Charts

Research Methodology

• Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
• Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
• Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
• Step 4: Performing Primary Research
• Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
• Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
• Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
• Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
• Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring

Impact Of Global Tariffs

Japan Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market

• 5.1 Executive Summary
  • 5.1.1 Japan Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Overview
  • 5.1.2 Competitive Analysis
  • 5.1.3 Market Trends
  • 5.1.4 End User Analysis
  • 5.1.5 Market Segmentation
• 5.2 Introduction
  • 5.2.1 Dental Implants
  • 5.2.2 Final Abutments
  • 5.2.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kits
    • 5.2.3.1 Instrument Kit Bundling
  • 5.2.4 Treatment Planning Software Market
  • 5.2.5 Surgical Guides
• 5.3 Unit and End User Analysis
  • 5.3.1 End Users of Dental Implants
  • 5.3.2 Dental Implant Unit Analysis
    • 5.3.2.1 Dental Implant Unit Sales by Application
    • 5.3.2.1.1 Single-Tooth Replacement
    • 5.3.2.1.2 Multi-Tooth Bridge Partial and Full Arch Securement
    • 5.3.2.1.3 Denture Securement
    • 5.3.2.2 Dental Implant Secured Dentures Unit Sales by Type
• 5.4 Currency Exchange Rate
• 5.5 Market Overview
• 5.6 Market Analysis and Forecast
  • 5.6.1 Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.1 Dental Implant Market by Segment
    • 5.6.1.1.1 Premium Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.1.2 Value Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.1.3 Discount Dental Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.2 Dental Implant Market by Material
    • 5.6.1.2.1 Titanium Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.2.2 Ceramic/Zirconia Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.3 Dental Implant Market by Shape
    • 5.6.1.3.1 Parallel-Wall Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.3.2 Tapered Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.4 Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type
    • 5.6.1.4.1 One-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.4.2 Two-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.4.3 Immediate Loading Procedure Implant Market
    • 5.6.1.5 Dental Implant Market by Connection Type
    • 5.6.1.5.1 Internal Connection
    • 5.6.1.5.2 External Connection
    • 5.6.1.5.3 One-Piece
  • 5.6.2 Final Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.1 Final Abutment Market by Segment
    • 5.6.2.1.1 Stock Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.1.2 Custom Cast Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.1.3 CAD/CAM Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.2 Final Abutment Market by Material
    • 5.6.2.2.1 Titanium Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.2.2 Ceramic/Zirconia Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.2.3 Gold Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.3 Final Abutment by Type
    • 5.6.2.3.1 Cement-Retained Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.3.2 Screw-Retained Abutment Market
    • 5.6.2.3.3 Denture Retaining Abutment Market
  • 5.6.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market
  • 5.6.4 Treatment Planning Software Market
    • 5.6.4.1 Treatment Planning Software Market Installed Base Analysis
  • 5.6.5 Surgical Guide Market
• 5.7 Drivers and Limiters
  • 5.7.1 Market Drivers
  • 5.7.2 Market Limiters
• 5.8 Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.1 Dental Implant Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.2 Final Abutment Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.3 Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.4 Treatment Planning Software Market Competitive Market Share Analysis
  • 5.8.5 Surgical Guide Market Competitive Market Share Analysis

Abbreviations

LIST OF CHARTS

• Chart 5-1: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024 - 2031
• Chart 5-2: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024 & 2031
• Chart 5-3: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-4: Dental Implant Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-5: Dental Implant Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-6: Dental Implant Market by Shape, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-7: Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-8: Dental Implant Market by Connection Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-9: Final Abutment Market by Segment Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-10: Final Abutment Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-11: Final Abutment Market by Type, South Korea, 2021 - 2031
• Chart 5-12: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 5-1: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Share Ranking by Segment, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-2: Factors Impacting the Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan
• Figure 5-3: Dental Implant and Final Abutment End User Analysis
• Figure 5-4: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Segmentation (1 of 2)
• Figure 5-5: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market Segmentation (2 of 2)
• Figure 5-6: Dental Implants Placed by End User Specialization, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-7: General Practitioner Implant Placement and Restoration Penetration, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-8: Specialist Implant Placement and Restoration Penetration, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-9: Dental Implant Units Sold by Application, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-10: Dental Implant Secured Dentures Units Sold by Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-11: Currency Exchange Rate, 2024
• Figure 5-12: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-13: Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-14: Total Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-15: Dental Implant Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-16: Dental Implant Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-17: Premium Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-18: Value Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-19: Discount Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-20: Dental Implant Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-21: Dental Implant Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-22: Titanium Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-23: Ceramic/Zirconia Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-24: Dental Implant Market by Shape, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-25: Dental Implant Market by Shape, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-26: Parallel-Wall Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-27: Tapered Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-28: Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-29: Dental Implant Market by Procedure Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-30: One-Stage Surgery Procedure Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-31: Two-Stage Surgery Procedure Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-32: Immediate Loading Procedure Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-33: Dental Implant Market by Connection Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-34: Dental Implant Market by Connection Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-35: Internal Connection Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-36: External Connection Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-37: One-Piece Implant Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-38: Total Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-39: Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-40: Final Abutment Market by Segment, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-41: Stock Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-42: Custom Cast Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-43: CAD/CAM Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-44: Final Abutment Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-45: Final Abutment Market by Material, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (JP¥M)
• Figure 5-46: Titanium Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-47: Ceramic/Zirconia Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-48: Gold Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-49: Final Abutment Market by Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (US$M)
• Figure 5-50: Final Abutment Market by Type, Japan, 2021 - 2031 (SKWM)
• Figure 5-51: Cement-Retained Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-52: Screw-Retained Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-53: Denture Retaining Abutment Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-54: Total Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-55: Total Treatment Planning Software Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-56: Treatment Planning Software Market Units Installed Analysis, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-57: Total Surgical Guide Market, Japan, 2021 - 2031
• Figure 5-58: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant and Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-59: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-60: Leading Competitors, Final Abutment Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-61: Leading Competitors, Dental Implant Instrument Kit Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-62: Leading Competitors, Treatment Planning Software Market, Japan, 2024
• Figure 5-63: Leading Competitors, Surgical Guide Market, Japan, 2024