查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1717111

按类型、应用程式和最终用户产业分類的实体智慧财产权市场—2025 年至 2030 年全球预测

Physical Intellectual Property Market by Type, Application, End-User Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2030
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 194 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计2024年实体智慧财产权市场价值将达到11.6亿美元，2025年将成长至12.5亿美元，到2030年将达到18.2亿美元，复合年增长率为7.71%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年2024年 11.6亿美元
预计2025年 12.5亿美元
预测年份 2030 18.2亿美元
复合年增长率（%） 7.71%

在快速变化的技术和创新世界中，实体智慧财产权已成为寻求保护其有形资产和专有进步的组织的焦点。在最尖端科技的进步和全球竞争日益激烈的推动下，市场不断发展。相关人员现在越来越关注制定有效的策略来保护发明、设计和技术诀窍。本报告仔细研究如何管理与实体产品相关的智慧财产权、变革的驱动因素以及对在这种动态环境中运作的公司的影响。

製造业、数位製造和设计自动化的进步正在改变智慧财产权管理的传统观念。公司面临的挑战不仅包括保护其核心资产，还包括利用颠覆性创新带来的新机会。随着与智慧财产权相关的经济效益变得越来越明显，风险也越来越高，迫使企业制定强有力的方法来识别、保护和收益物质创新。

这里提出的分析将成为决策者和行业专业人士的重要资源，提供对不断变化的市场趋势、细分复杂性和区域动态的全面见解，这些将塑造物理智慧财产权的未来。深入了解这些因素可以帮助公司加强竞争地位并在日益复杂的环境中释放价值。

塑造实体智慧财产权格局的变革

技术的快速进步以及数位解决方案与实体製造流程的整合正在引发实体智慧财产权的管理、评估和执行方式的变革性转变。过去几年，不仅技术创新水准发生了重大变化，而且法律规范、竞争结构和商业策略也发生了重大变化。这些发展促使多种因素共同改变市场实践。

数位转型是这项变革的核心。人工智慧主导设计、电脑辅助製造和即时分析等现代工具正在提高公司保护其物理创新的精度和速度。这种技术主导的转变简化了流程，使对智慧财产权组合的监督更加有效，从而更容易发现侵权行为并降低风险。透过采用这些技术，公司能够更好地驾驭实体製造和虚拟智慧财产权管理的交会。

同时，世界和市场之间的联繫日益紧密，重迭的司法管辖区和复杂的法规对传统的智慧财产权保护模式提出了挑战。组织必须调整和实施尊重当地法规的策略，同时保持全球执法。这导致了对投资组合管理实践的重新评估，并增加了对预防性专利申请和设计註册等措施的依赖。

协作生态系统和跨产业伙伴关係的兴起正在推动更大的创新，并模糊内部开发和共同创造的智慧财产权之间的差异。这种合作精神促进了创新，但也要求谨慎管理智慧财产权，以平衡共用利益和个人控制。处于这一转变前沿的公司正在大力投资综合知识产权管理平台和策略联盟，以在数位世界和实体世界融合的市场中保持竞争力。

作为回应，行业领导者正在重新考虑其风险管理、竞争情报和执法策略的方法。现在不仅需要保护专有资产，还需要积极利用这些资产来促进成长和促进长期永续性。因此，实体智慧财产权的演变具有不断转型的特点，其驱动力来自技术进步、不断发展的法律环境和不断变化的全球市场动态。

高阶细分洞察帮助您制定市场策略

对市场区隔的详细评估揭示了物理知识产权研究跨越不同学科的多维图景。根据类型，市场在建筑设计权、版权、许可、专利、商业机密和商标等领域进行评估。每种类型都带来了独特的挑战和机会，因此组织可以自订其保护策略以反映创新的不同方面，同时符合业务重点。这些智慧财产权资产的多样性使我们能够提供全面的覆盖，从保护突破性发明的具有法律效力的专利到保护专有业务流程的商业机密等更细微的元素。

同样，基于应用的细分可以提供更深入的市场理解。本部分分析了组装汽车、家用电子电器、工业自动化和行动运算设备等产业的智慧财产权状况。这种基于应用的观点强调了与产品最终用途相关的智慧财产权考虑的差异，每个行业都需要製定考虑到其营运和技术细微差别的客製化策略。这些应用程式的发展正在将数位组件整合到实体物件中，凸显了考虑有形资产和嵌入式技术创新的混合保护策略的必要性。

此外，根据最终用户行业评估市场进一步丰富了这种细分。汽车、电子、医疗保健、IT 和电信以及半导体製造等主要终端用户产业展示了智慧财产权保护如何嵌入到高度专业化的工业工作流程中。智慧财产权类型的复杂组合及其特定用途凸显了每个行业所需的客製化方法。例如，在汽车产业，严格的安全和监管标准往往与突破性设计创新的需求交织在一起。另一方面，IT和电信以及半导体製造等行业严重依赖快速的产品开发週期和严格的专利策略来维持市场领先地位。这些细分见解提供了广阔的市场视野，并强调了以符合生产过程和消费者环境中的最终用途的方式对知识资产进行分类的重要性。

目录

第一章 引言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概述

第五章 市场洞察

  • 市场动态
    • 驱动程式
      • 消费者对差异化产品的需求日益增加
      • 企业对保护专有技术的兴趣日益浓厚
      • 加强商业智慧财产权组合的监管压力和合规要求
    • 限制因素
      • 实体 IP 解决方案在扩充性和部署方面受到限制
    • 机会
      • 利用机器学习演算法预测实体智慧财产权产品的潜在侵权
      • 3D列印在实体IP原型製作设计应用的进展
    • 任务
      • 国际法的复杂性：实体智慧财产权
  • 市场区隔分析
    • 类型：专利在高科技和製药行业中的重要性日益增强
    • 应用：拓展实体智慧财产权在组装领域的应用
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL分析
    • 政治的
    • 经济
    • 社会
    • 技术的
    • 合法的
    • 环境

6. 实体智慧财产权市场（按类型）

  • 建筑设计权
  • 版权
  • 授权
  • 专利
  • 商业机密
  • 商标

第七章 实体智慧财产权市场（按应用）

  • 组装车辆
  • 消费性电子产品
  • 工业自动化
  • 行动运算设备

8. 实体智慧财产权市场（依最终使用者产业划分）

  • 车
  • 电子产品
  • 卫生保健
  • 资讯科技/通讯
  • 半导体製造

9. 美洲实体智慧财产权市场

  • 阿根廷
  • 巴西
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 美国

10. 亚太实体智慧财产权市场

  • 澳洲
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 印尼
  • 日本
  • 马来西亚
  • 菲律宾
  • 新加坡
  • 韩国
  • 台湾
  • 泰国
  • 越南

11. 欧洲、中东和非洲实体智慧财产权市场

  • 丹麦
  • 埃及
  • 芬兰
  • 法国
  • 德国
  • 以色列
  • 义大利
  • 荷兰
  • 奈及利亚
  • 挪威
  • 波兰
  • 卡达
  • 俄罗斯
  • 沙乌地阿拉伯
  • 南非
  • 西班牙
  • 瑞典
  • 瑞士
  • 土耳其
  • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
  • 英国

第十二章竞争格局

  • 2024年市场占有率分析
  • 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
  • 竞争情境分析
  • 战略分析与建议

公司名单

  • Achronix Semiconductor Corporation
  • Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  • Alphawave IP Group PLC
  • Arm Limited
  • Arteris Inc.
  • Broadcom Inc.
  • Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
  • CEVA, Inc.
  • Faraday Technology Corporation
  • Frontgrade Technologies
  • Intel Corporation
  • Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
  • M31 Technology Corporation
  • Microchip Technology Inc.
  • NVIDIA Corporation
  • Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
  • Rambus Inc
  • Renesas Electronics Corporation
  • Silvaco Group, Inc.
  • Synopsys, Inc.
Product Code: MRR-957C47F90B47

The Physical Intellectual Property Market was valued at USD 1.16 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 1.25 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.71%, reaching USD 1.82 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.16 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 1.25 billion
Forecast Year [2030] USD 1.82 billion
CAGR (%) 7.71%

In the fast-paced world of technology and innovation, physical intellectual property has taken center stage for organizations looking to protect their tangible assets and proprietary advances. The market is evolving, driven by cutting-edge technological improvements and increasing global competition. Stakeholders are now more focused on establishing effective strategies that safeguard inventions, designs, and technical know-how. This report provides a detailed look at how intellectual property pertaining to physical products is managed, the forces driving transformation, and the implications for businesses operating in a dynamic environment.

Advances in manufacturing, digital fabrication, and design automation are reshaping traditional concepts of intellectual property management. Companies are challenged to not only safeguard their core assets but also to harness new opportunities arising from disruptive innovations. The stakes are higher as the economic benefits tied to intellectual rights become more pronounced, prompting organizations to devise robust approaches for identification, protection, and monetization of their physical innovations.

The analysis presented here serves as a vital resource for decision-makers and industry experts, offering comprehensive insights into evolving market trends, segmentation intricacies, and regional dynamics that collectively shape the future of physical intellectual property. With a deep understanding of these elements, organizations can bolster their competitive positioning and unlock value in an increasingly complex landscape.

Transformative Shifts Reshaping the Physical Intellectual Property Landscape

Rapid advancements in technology and the integration of digital solutions into physical manufacturing processes have triggered transformative shifts in how physical intellectual property is managed, valued, and enforced. The past few years have seen significant changes not only in innovation levels but also in regulatory frameworks, competitive structures, and operational strategies. These developments have propelled a confluence of factors that are revolutionizing market practices.

Digital transformation is at the heart of these changes. Modern tools such as AI-driven design, computer-aided manufacturing, and real-time analytics are enhancing the precision and speed with which companies protect their physical innovations. This tech-driven shift has streamlined processes and enabled efficient monitoring of intellectual property portfolios, making it easier to detect infringements and mitigate risk. As companies adopt these technologies, they are better equipped to navigate the intersection of physical manufacturing and virtual IP management.

Simultaneously, the global marketplace has become increasingly connected, leading to overlapping jurisdictions and complex regulations that challenge traditional models of intellectual property protection. Organizations must adapt by implementing strategies that respect local regulations while maintaining global enforceability. This has led to a reevaluation of portfolio management practices and an increased reliance on preventative measures, including proactive patent filing and design registration.

The rise of collaborative ecosystems and cross-industry partnerships has further accelerated innovation, blurring the distinction between internally developed and jointly created IP. This collaborative spirit, while fueling innovation, demands astute management of intellectual property rights to balance shared benefits and individual control. Companies at the forefront of these shifts have invested significantly in integrated IP management platforms and strategic alliances, ensuring they remain competitive in a market where the digital and physical worlds converge.

In response, industry leaders are rethinking their approaches to risk management, competitive intelligence, and enforcement strategies. They are now tasked with not only protecting their proprietary assets but also proactively leveraging these assets in ways that drive growth and foster long-term sustainability. The evolution of physical intellectual property, therefore, is characterized by an ongoing transformation, driven by advancements in technology, evolving legal environments, and an ever-changing global market dynamic.

Nuanced Segmentation Insights Shaping Market Strategies

A detailed assessment of market segmentation reveals a multidimensional landscape where the study of physical intellectual property spans diverse arenas. When examined based on type, the market is assessed across domains such as Architectural Design Rights, Copyrights, Licensing, Patents, Trade Secrets, and Trademarks. Each type presents unique challenges and opportunities, enabling organizations to tailor their protection strategies and align with operational priorities while reflecting distinct aspects of innovation. The diverse nature of these intellectual properties ensures that they provide comprehensive coverage-ranging from legally enforceable patents that protect groundbreaking inventions to subtle elements like trade secrets that shield proprietary business processes.

Similarly, segmentation based on application further refines market understanding. The intellectual property landscape under this segmentation is analyzed across industries such as Assembled Vehicles, Consumer Electronic Devices, Industrial Automation, and Mobile Computing Devices. This application-based perspective underscores the variations in intellectual property considerations tied to product end-use, where each industry demands bespoke strategies given its operational and technological nuances. The evolution in these applications highlights the integration of digital components into physical objects and the subsequent need for hybrid protection strategies that account for both tangible assets and embedded technological innovations.

Moreover, assessing the market based on the end-user industry enriches this segmentation further. Critical end-user sectors, including Automotive, Electronics, Healthcare, IT & Telecom, and Semiconductor Manufacturing, illustrate how intellectual property protection is embedded in the fabric of highly specialized industrial workflows. The intricate interplay between intellectual property types and their specific applications underscores the tailored approaches required by different industries. For example, the automotive sector often intertwines rigorous safety and regulatory standards with the need for groundbreaking design innovation. Meanwhile, industries like IT & Telecom and Semiconductor Manufacturing depend heavily on rapid product development cycles and rigorous patent strategies to maintain market leadership. Together, these segmentation insights offer an extensive view of the market, emphasizing the importance of categorizing intellectual assets in a manner that aligns with both the production process and the final application in the consumer environment.

Based on Type, market is studied across Architectural Design Rights, Copyrights, Licensing, Patents, Trade Secrets, and Trademarks.

Based on Application, market is studied across Assembled Vehicles, Consumer Electronic Devices, Industrial Automation, and Mobile Computing Devices.

Based on End-User Industry, market is studied across Automotive, Electronics, Healthcare, IT & Telecom, and Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Regional Dynamics and Market Influences Across Key Geographies

An exploration of regional dynamics reveals that global perspectives on physical intellectual property are shaped by inter-regional differences, yet there is a shared commitment towards innovation and protection. In the Americas, a rich blend of established legal frameworks and innovative industrial ecosystems supports robust intellectual property practices, where corporations collaborate with research institutions to enforce and advance protection measures. The region's mature markets, combined with forward-thinking startups, have created a dynamic space that frequently sets industry benchmarks.

In Europe, the Middle East & Africa region, the blend of diverse legal traditions and emerging economic opportunities has culminated in highly adaptive intellectual property management strategies. Here, businesses navigate complex regulatory environments while capitalizing on the growing emphasis on technological advancements and cross-border collaboration. The region stands out by methodically balancing its rich heritage with modern technological imperatives, ensuring that intellectual property strategies are both comprehensive and flexible.

The Asia-Pacific region, a powerhouse of rapid industrial growth and technological innovation, offers a vibrant landscape where intellectual property serves as an essential tool for competitive differentiation. With significant investments in advanced manufacturing and automation, companies in this region are keen on leveraging intellectual property to secure market advantages and foster rapid innovation cycles. Cultural and economic factors combine in novel ways, efficiently blending traditional practices with cutting-edge digital transformation, which is reshaping both production processes and intellectual property regulations.

These regional insights illuminate the strategic imperatives that companies must adopt to harness the full potential of physical intellectual property. The combination of mature markets, adaptive regulatory frameworks, and rapid technological advancement underscores the importance of a regionally-tailored approach in any comprehensive intellectual asset management strategy. For executives, understanding these nuanced differences across geographies is vital in crafting policies that are not only globally resonant but also finely tuned to the local business environment.

Based on Region, market is studied across Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East & Africa. The Americas is further studied across Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and United States. The United States is further studied across California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The Asia-Pacific is further studied across Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. The Europe, Middle East & Africa is further studied across Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Nigeria, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom.

In-Depth Analysis of Leading Companies in Physical Intellectual Property

The landscape of physical intellectual property is shaped significantly by the strategies and innovations of key industry players. This sector is populated by an assortment of companies known for their technological acumen and robust intellectual property portfolios. For instance, firms like Achronix Semiconductor Corporation and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. have consistently driven innovation through efficient IP utilization and forward-thinking patent strategies. In tandem, organizations such as Alphawave IP Group PLC and Arm Limited demonstrate the importance of specialized IP management solutions that accommodate rapid technological evolution and diverse product lines.

Industry innovators like Arteris Inc. and Broadcom Inc. have set benchmarks in leveraging their intellectual property to capture market leadership and drive strategic collaborations. These companies exemplify how strategic acquisitions, licensing agreements, and a proactive stance on patent filings can fuel growth in an intensely competitive environment. Companies such as Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and CEVA, Inc. are harnessing deep-rooted engineering expertise and state-of-the-art research and development capabilities to safeguard their technological advancements.

Faraday Technology Corporation and Frontgrade Technologies are noteworthy for their integrated approach to technological innovation and intellectual property protection, ensuring that their solutions remain cutting-edge while being legally fortified. Iconic industry names like Intel Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation continue to lead in the global arena, mirroring the industry's commitment to balancing innovation with rigorous IP safeguarding. Smaller yet influential entities like M31 Technology Corporation and Microchip Technology Inc. have also carved a niche by adopting agile methods that combine speed of execution with thorough IP oversight.

Moreover, heavyweight technology firms including NVIDIA Corporation, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., and Rambus Inc have demonstrated a commitment to continuously evolving their intellectual property strategies to adapt to rapidly shifting market dynamics. The influence of companies, such as Renesas Electronics Corporation, Silvaco Group, Inc., and Synopsys, Inc., further underscores the significance of sophisticated IP management in sustaining technological superiority. These corporate narratives collectively serve as benchmarks, providing industry participants with actionable insights into best practices and innovative approaches that drive fierce competitive advantage.

The report delves into recent significant developments in the Physical Intellectual Property Market, highlighting leading vendors and their innovative profiles. These include Achronix Semiconductor Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Alphawave IP Group PLC, Arm Limited, Arteris Inc., Broadcom Inc., Cadence Design Systems, Inc., CEVA, Inc., Faraday Technology Corporation, Frontgrade Technologies, Intel Corporation, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation, M31 Technology Corporation, Microchip Technology Inc., NVIDIA Corporation, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., Rambus Inc, Renesas Electronics Corporation, Silvaco Group, Inc., and Synopsys, Inc.. Strategic Recommendations for Leading Industry Executives

For industry executives aiming to navigate the intricate landscape of physical intellectual property, an informed, proactive approach is key. The integration of advanced analytical tools and a commitment to maintaining up-to-date legal and technological insights is essential to remain competitive. Businesses should continually invest in emerging technologies that enhance the precision of IP monitoring and create synergies between product innovation and intellectual property management.

Organizations are advised to cultivate an ecosystem that fosters collaboration between innovation teams, legal experts, and external research bodies. Such collaboration can drive the development and implementation of cutting-edge strategies that not only protect intellectual assets but also position them as drivers of revenue. Cultivating an environment that supports cross-functional integration and agile decision-making will empower companies to respond effectively to market disruptions and evolving regulatory challenges.

Another recommendation is to adopt a forward-looking approach towards portfolio diversification. Balanced portfolios that encompass a wide array of IP types provide a protective cushion against market uncertainties and competitive pressures. Companies should focus on a combination of long-term patents, dynamic licensing agreements, and agile trade secret management to ensure comprehensive coverage of their intellectual assets. This diversified strategy also enables risk mitigation by spreading exposure across various levels of protective measures.

Furthermore, harnessing data analytics and market insights is crucial for the continuous refinement of IP strategies. By leveraging actionable insights and real-time data, organizations can preemptively address infringements, monitor competitor movements, and identify emerging trends. Executives should consider forming dedicated task forces that prioritize IP analytics and invest in state-of-the-art solutions to monitor the competitive landscape.

Finally, companies must also prioritize continuous learning and adaptation. The dynamic nature of physical intellectual property management means that strategies should be regularly reviewed and updated in line with technological advancements and regulatory changes. Embracing a culture of perpetual innovation will help organizations remain resilient in the face of disruptive changes and capitalize on new growth opportunities as they arise.

Summarizing the Future Trajectory of Physical Intellectual Property

The evolving narrative of physical intellectual property is defined by rapid technological shifts, intense global competition, and the increasing importance of comprehensive IP management strategies. This report has explored the multifaceted elements that drive changes across the landscape, from breakthrough trends in digital transformation to detailed market segmentations that highlight the nuanced interplay between IP types, applications, and end-user industries.

Furthermore, regional analyses have provided a clear view of how dynamics in the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific shape strategic IP management. The critical insights drawn from leading companies emphasize a shared commitment to innovation, advanced IP protection, and strategic partnerships in an increasingly interconnected world. The insights provide a compelling case for why organizations must continuously adapt, invest in emerging technologies, and prioritize the legal safeguarding of their intellectual assets.

In essence, the trajectory of physical intellectual property suggests a future where the lines between digital innovation and physical manufacturing continue to blur. For companies poised at the intersection of technology and production, adopting integrated, agile, and forward-thinking strategies will be crucial. Embracing these strategies will not only protect their current innovations but also pave the way for sustained competitive advantages and long-term industry leadership.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Define: Research Objective
  • 2.2. Determine: Research Design
  • 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
  • 2.4. Collect: Data Source
  • 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
  • 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
  • 2.7. Publish: Research Report
  • 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Market Dynamics
    • 5.1.1. Drivers
      • 5.1.1.1. Increasing demand for differentiated products among consumers
      • 5.1.1.2. Growing focus on protecting proprietary technologies among businesses
      • 5.1.1.3. Regulatory pressures and compliance requirements toward solidifying business IP portfolios
    • 5.1.2. Restraints
      • 5.1.2.1. Limited scalability and deployment of physical intellectual property solutions
    • 5.1.3. Opportunities
      • 5.1.3.1. Leveraging machine learning algorithms to predict potential infringements on Physical IP products
      • 5.1.3.2. Advancements in 3D printing for applications in Physical IP prototyping and design
    • 5.1.4. Challenges
      • 5.1.4.1. Complexities of international laws governing physical intellectual property
  • 5.2. Market Segmentation Analysis
    • 5.2.1. Type: Rising significance of patents in high-tech and pharmaceutical industries
    • 5.2.2. Application: Increased application of physical intellectual property in assembled vehicles
  • 5.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 5.3.1. Threat of New Entrants
    • 5.3.2. Threat of Substitutes
    • 5.3.3. Bargaining Power of Customers
    • 5.3.4. Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 5.3.5. Industry Rivalry
  • 5.4. PESTLE Analysis
    • 5.4.1. Political
    • 5.4.2. Economic
    • 5.4.3. Social
    • 5.4.4. Technological
    • 5.4.5. Legal
    • 5.4.6. Environmental

6. Physical Intellectual Property Market, by Type

  • 6.1. Introduction
  • 6.2. Architectural Design Rights
  • 6.3. Copyrights
  • 6.4. Licensing
  • 6.5. Patents
  • 6.6. Trade Secrets
  • 6.7. Trademarks

7. Physical Intellectual Property Market, by Application

  • 7.1. Introduction
  • 7.2. Assembled Vehicles
  • 7.3. Consumer Electronic Devices
  • 7.4. Industrial Automation
  • 7.5. Mobile Computing Devices

8. Physical Intellectual Property Market, by End-User Industry

  • 8.1. Introduction
  • 8.2. Automotive
  • 8.3. Electronics
  • 8.4. Healthcare
  • 8.5. IT & Telecom
  • 8.6. Semiconductor Manufacturing

9. Americas Physical Intellectual Property Market

  • 9.1. Introduction
  • 9.2. Argentina
  • 9.3. Brazil
  • 9.4. Canada
  • 9.5. Mexico
  • 9.6. United States

10. Asia-Pacific Physical Intellectual Property Market

  • 10.1. Introduction
  • 10.2. Australia
  • 10.3. China
  • 10.4. India
  • 10.5. Indonesia
  • 10.6. Japan
  • 10.7. Malaysia
  • 10.8. Philippines
  • 10.9. Singapore
  • 10.10. South Korea
  • 10.11. Taiwan
  • 10.12. Thailand
  • 10.13. Vietnam

11. Europe, Middle East & Africa Physical Intellectual Property Market

  • 11.1. Introduction
  • 11.2. Denmark
  • 11.3. Egypt
  • 11.4. Finland
  • 11.5. France
  • 11.6. Germany
  • 11.7. Israel
  • 11.8. Italy
  • 11.9. Netherlands
  • 11.10. Nigeria
  • 11.11. Norway
  • 11.12. Poland
  • 11.13. Qatar
  • 11.14. Russia
  • 11.15. Saudi Arabia
  • 11.16. South Africa
  • 11.17. Spain
  • 11.18. Sweden
  • 11.19. Switzerland
  • 11.20. Turkey
  • 11.21. United Arab Emirates
  • 11.22. United Kingdom

12. Competitive Landscape

  • 12.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 12.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 12.3. Competitive Scenario Analysis
    • 12.3.1. Celestial AI acquired Rockley Photonics patent portfolio for USD 20 million
    • 12.3.2. Siemens digital industries software introduced the Solido IP validation suite
    • 12.3.3. Synopsys expands semiconductor intellectual property portfolio with acquisition of Intrinsic ID
  • 12.4. Strategy Analysis & Recommendation

Companies Mentioned

  • 1. Achronix Semiconductor Corporation
  • 2. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
  • 3. Alphawave IP Group PLC
  • 4. Arm Limited
  • 5. Arteris Inc.
  • 6. Broadcom Inc.
  • 7. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
  • 8. CEVA, Inc.
  • 9. Faraday Technology Corporation
  • 10. Frontgrade Technologies
  • 11. Intel Corporation
  • 12. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
  • 13. M31 Technology Corporation
  • 14. Microchip Technology Inc.
  • 15. NVIDIA Corporation
  • 16. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
  • 17. Rambus Inc
  • 18. Renesas Electronics Corporation
  • 19. Silvaco Group, Inc.
  • 20. Synopsys, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET MULTI-CURRENCY
  • FIGURE 2. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET MULTI-LANGUAGE
  • FIGURE 3. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET RESEARCH PROCESS
  • FIGURE 4. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, 2024 VS 2030
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 13. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. AMERICAS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 15. AMERICAS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. UNITED STATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 17. UNITED STATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. ASIA-PACIFIC PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 19. ASIA-PACIFIC PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2030 (%)
  • FIGURE 21. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2030 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 23. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET DYNAMICS
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN RIGHTS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COPYRIGHTS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY LICENSING, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY PATENTS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TRADE SECRETS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TRADEMARKS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY ASSEMBLED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY CONSUMER ELECTRONIC DEVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY MOBILE COMPUTING DEVICES, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTRONICS, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY IT & TELECOM, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, BY REGION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. AMERICAS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. AMERICAS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. AMERICAS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. AMERICAS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. ARGENTINA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. ARGENTINA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. ARGENTINA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. BRAZIL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. BRAZIL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. BRAZIL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. CANADA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. CANADA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. CANADA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. MEXICO PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. MEXICO PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. MEXICO PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. UNITED STATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. UNITED STATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. UNITED STATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. UNITED STATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY STATE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. ASIA-PACIFIC PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. ASIA-PACIFIC PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. ASIA-PACIFIC PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. ASIA-PACIFIC PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. AUSTRALIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. AUSTRALIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. AUSTRALIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. CHINA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. CHINA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. CHINA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. INDIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. INDIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. INDIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. INDONESIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. INDONESIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. INDONESIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. JAPAN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. JAPAN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. JAPAN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. MALAYSIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. MALAYSIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. MALAYSIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. PHILIPPINES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. PHILIPPINES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. PHILIPPINES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. SINGAPORE PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. SINGAPORE PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. SINGAPORE PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. SOUTH KOREA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. SOUTH KOREA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. SOUTH KOREA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. TAIWAN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. TAIWAN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. TAIWAN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. THAILAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. THAILAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. THAILAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. VIETNAM PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. VIETNAM PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. VIETNAM PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. DENMARK PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. DENMARK PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. DENMARK PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. EGYPT PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. EGYPT PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EGYPT PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. FINLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. FINLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. FINLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. FRANCE PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. FRANCE PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. FRANCE PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GERMANY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GERMANY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GERMANY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ISRAEL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ISRAEL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ISRAEL PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. ITALY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. ITALY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. ITALY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. NETHERLANDS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. NETHERLANDS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. NETHERLANDS PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. NIGERIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. NIGERIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. NIGERIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. NORWAY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. NORWAY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. NORWAY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. POLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. POLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. POLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. QATAR PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. QATAR PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. QATAR PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. RUSSIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. RUSSIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. RUSSIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. SAUDI ARABIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. SAUDI ARABIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. SAUDI ARABIA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. SOUTH AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. SOUTH AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. SOUTH AFRICA PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. SPAIN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. SPAIN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. SPAIN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. SWEDEN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. SWEDEN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. SWEDEN PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. SWITZERLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. SWITZERLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. SWITZERLAND PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. TURKEY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. TURKEY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. TURKEY PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. UNITED KINGDOM PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY TYPE, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. UNITED KINGDOM PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. UNITED KINGDOM PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SIZE, BY END-USER INDUSTRY, 2018-2030 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • TABLE 153. PHYSICAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024