火箭发动机市场（按推进剂类型、推力等级、发动机循环、级数和应用）—2025-2030 年全球预测

预计火箭发动机市场规模到2024年将达到85.4亿美元，到2025年将达到90.6亿美元，到2030年将达到122.4亿美元，复合年增长率为6.17%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年2024年	85.4亿美元
预计2025年	90.6亿美元
预测年份 2030	122.4亿美元
复合年增长率（%）	6.17%

透过概述技术发展、监管变化和战略要点，为火箭发动机市场分析提供启动平台

近几十年来，在材料科学和系统设计突破的推动下，火箭推进技术经历了重大变革，实现了前所未有的性能和可靠性。积层製造技术的进步降低了几何复杂性并缩短了製造前置作业时间，而新型复合材料和金属合金则提高了推重比和热阻。同时，数位数位双胞胎和基于模型的系统工程的出现增强了预测性维护能力，并优化了整个飞行剖面的性能，使现代引擎能够同时满足严格的安全标准和雄心勃勃的任务目标。

下一部分探讨技术和政策的关键变化，评估近期关税政策的影响，并深入研究细分、区域概况和竞争格局。

检验材料进步、数位整合和地缘政治压力推动的火箭发动机格局的关键转变

火箭发动机设计的最新趋势反映了先进材料、数位整合以及不断变化的地缘政治优先事项，这些因素共同作用，正在重新定义推进领域的格局。高性能陶瓷基质复合材料和高强度合金如今能够承受极端热循环，同时减轻系统重量。这些材料创新与先进的传感器和遥测整合相得益彰，实现了即时健康监测和自适应控制策略，从而提高了引擎的可靠性和任务成功率。因此，开发週期和营运成本之间的平衡正朝着数据主导的最佳化方向转变，并透过设计迭代推动持续改善。

分析美国关税调整对火箭发动机供应链的累积影响：製造成本和战略采购决策

美国于2025年初启动的关税结构审查，对整个火箭发动机供应链施加了明显的压力，尤其影响到关键原材料的进口，例如高等级钛粉和镍基高温合金。包含精密加工涡轮帮浦和专用催化剂的零件成本正在上涨，迫使主承包商和子系统供应商重新评估筹资策略。这些课税的累积效应导致生产成本上升，对研发预算和合约谈判都产生了影响。

根据推进剂类型、推力等级、引擎循环、应用和阶段配置得出关键的市场细分洞察

对推进剂类型的详细研究揭示了其独特的性能和应用概况。混合推进剂系统结合了金属基和聚合物基配方，因其安全性和节流优势而仍然颇具吸引力，尤其适用于次轨道飞行器和实验平台。液态推进剂引擎（分为低温推进剂和自燃推进剂）在重型轨道发射等高能量任务中越来越受欢迎，其中低温推进剂提供卓越的比衝，而自燃推进剂则以其在轨道机动系统中的可靠性而闻名。同时，复合和双基固体推进剂结构对于飞弹推力模组和助推级仍然至关重要，因为这些系统注重简洁性和可包装性，能够确保任务的就绪性。

了解美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区火箭引擎发展的区域动态：需求和创新范式

火箭引擎领域的区域动态呈现出错综复杂的发展轨迹和战略重点。在整个美洲，政府航太机构与私人企业之间的密切合作为快速原型製作和商业化创造了肥沃的土壤。对可重复使用发动机架构和增材製造设施的投资，推动北美公司在降低每公里成本倡议走在前列，而国防导向项目则继续支撑着高超音速推进和先进导弹系统的技术创新。

领先火箭引擎製造商的概况：他们的战略方针、技术能力和合作关係。

领先的推进系统製造商正在展示不同的策略方法和创新路径。成熟的整合商利用其深厚的技术积累，透过先进的涡轮机械和温度控管系统改进高推力液体引擎。同时，拥有敏捷开发模式的新兴企业正在利用积层製造技术生产复杂的喷射器和燃烧室组件，实现快速迭代週期，挑战传统的供应模式。

为行业领导者制定可行的建议，以利用新兴火箭发动机技术的伙伴关係和供应链弹性

寻求在推动市场保持竞争优势的产业领导者应优先考虑供应链多元化，与多家关键合金和积层製造伙伴关係的合格供应商合作，减少机会政策主导。投资模组化引擎架构可提高扩充性，并能够快速适应新的任务概况和产量需求，而无需彻底重新设计。为了加快创新週期，鼓励各组织整合基于模型的系统工程方法，并利用数位双胞胎来复製端到端效能指标，并支援在虚拟试验台上进行迭代检验。

火箭发动机市场中专注于数据收集、综合分析框架和检验过程的严格调查方法的详细信息

我们的调查方法是将二手资料和一手资料进行结构化组合，并辅以严格的分析方法和检验通讯协定。初始阶段包括全面审查已发表的技术论文、公司文件和政策文件，以了解该前沿领域的技术和监管格局。此外，我们还对专利资料库和技术会议论文集进行了系统性研究，以增强二手资料研究的有效性，从而确保全面了解材料、製造流程和数位整合领域的新兴趋势。

全面总结火箭发动机市场发展轨迹、技术演变以及相关人员和创新者的战略路径

总而言之，火箭引擎领域正处于一个十字路口，其特点是重大技术进步、不断变化的政策格局以及日益激烈的全球竞争。材料创新和数位化整合正在推动引擎性能迈向新的高度，而关税重组则凸显了供应链韧性和策略采购适应性的必要性。推进剂化学成分、推力等级、循环架构、应用领域和级间配置的市场细分，为相关人员提供了一个细緻的视角，使他们能够根据特定任务需求客製化产品。

目录

第一章：前言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概述

第五章市场动态

• 为降低发射成本，可重复使用火箭引擎的需求不断增长
• 增加私人太空探勘和商业化的投资
• 火箭发动机部件3D列印技术的进展
• 绿色推进技术兴起，协助环保发射
• 扩大混合推进系统在小型运载火箭的应用
• 用于深空任务的高推力电推进系统的开发
• 用于发射小型卫星的火箭发动机的小型化
• 政府太空计画激增推动下一代推进技术的创新
• 整合人工智慧和数数位双胞胎用于火箭发动机设计和测试
• 加强航太机构与私人製造商之间的合作

第六章 市场洞察

• 波特五力分析
• PESTEL分析

第七章 2025年美国关税的累积影响

第 8 章火箭发动机市场（依推进剂类型）

• 混合推进剂
  • 金属化推进剂
  • 聚合物基推进剂
• 液态推进剂
  • 低温推进剂
  • 自燃推进剂
• 固体推进剂
  • 复合推进剂
  • 双基推进剂

第九章 火箭发动机市场：推力等级

• 高推力
• 低推力
• 中等推力

第 10 章 火箭发动机市场（按发动机循环）

• 膨胀机循环
• 燃气发电机循环
• 泵送週期
• 分级燃烧循环

第 11 章 火箭发动机市场（按级数）

• 3级或以上
• 单级入轨
• 3个阶段
• 2个阶段

第十二章火箭发动机市场（按应用）

• 飞弹推进
• 轨道发射
  • 大型运载火箭
  • 中型运载火箭
  • 小型运载火箭
• 卫星推进
  • 轨道上升推进
  • 驻扎推广
• 亚轨道发射
  • 科学发射
  • 旅游启动

第 13 章：美洲火箭发动机市场

• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 阿根廷

第十四章欧洲、中东和非洲火箭发动机市场

• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 阿拉伯聯合大公国
• 沙乌地阿拉伯
• 南非
• 丹麦
• 荷兰
• 卡达
• 芬兰
• 瑞典
• 奈及利亚
• 埃及
• 土耳其
• 以色列
• 挪威
• 波兰
• 瑞士

第十五章：亚太火箭引擎市场

• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国
• 印尼
• 泰国
• 菲律宾
• 马来西亚
• 新加坡
• 越南
• 台湾

第十六章竞争格局

• 2024年市场占有率分析
• 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
• 竞争分析
  • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • Avio SpA
  • Airbus SAS
  • ArianeGroup SAS
  • IHI Corporation
  • L3Harris Technologies
  • Leidos Holdings, Inc.
  • Moog ISP, Inc.
  • NAMMO AS
  • Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
  • Roketsan AS
  • Sierra Nevada Corporation
  • Sierra Space Corporation
  • Skyrora Limited
  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
  • The Boeing Company
  • URSA MAJOR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • Gilmour Space Technologies Pty Ltd
  • Deep Blue Aerospace Co., Ltd.

第十七章 研究人工智慧

第十八章 研究统计

第十九章 研究联络人

第二十章 研究报导

第21章 附录

The Rocket Engine Market was valued at USD 8.54 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 9.06 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.17%, reaching USD 12.24 billion by 2030.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024]	USD 8.54 billion
Estimated Year [2025]	USD 9.06 billion
Forecast Year [2030]	USD 12.24 billion
CAGR (%)	6.17%

Unveiling the Launchpad for Rocket Engine Market Analysis by Outlining Technological Evolution Regulatory Shifts and Strategic Imperatives

Rocket propulsion technologies have undergone a profound transformation over recent decades, driven by breakthroughs in materials science and system design that have enabled unprecedented performance and reliability. Advances in additive manufacturing techniques have allowed for geometric complexities and reduced manufacturing lead times, while novel composite and metallic alloys have improved thrust-to-weight ratios and temperature resistance. Concurrently, the emergence of digital twins and model-based systems engineering has enhanced predictive maintenance capabilities and optimized performance across flight profiles, ensuring that modern engines meet both rigorous safety standards and ambitious mission objectives.

Against this backdrop, stakeholders across government agencies, commercial launch providers, and defense contractors seek actionable intelligence to inform strategic decisions. This report offers a holistic examination of current propulsion system trends, regulatory dynamics, and market influences, delivering a structured framework to navigate complexity and identify growth opportunities. By integrating technological, geopolitical, and economic dimensions, the analysis establishes a comprehensive foundation for understanding market pathways and alignment with long-term development goals.

Moving forward, the subsequent sections explore pivotal shifts in technology and policy, assess the implications of recent tariff policies, and delve into segmentation, regional profiles, and competitive landscapes

Examining the Pivotal Transformative Shifts in Rocket Engine Landscape Driven by Material Advancements Digital Integration and Geopolitical Pressures

Recent developments in rocket engine design reflect a convergence of advanced materials, digital integration, and shifting geopolitical priorities, which collectively have redefined the propulsion landscape. High-performance ceramic matrix composites and high-strength alloys now withstand extreme thermal cycles while reducing system mass. These material innovations are complemented by the integration of advanced sensors and telemetry, enabling real-time health monitoring and adaptive control strategies that enhance engine reliability and mission success rates. As a result, the balance between development cycles and operational costs has shifted decisively toward data-driven optimization, fostering continuous improvement across design iterations.

At the same time, the intensification of global space ambitions has amplified competitive pressures, driving national and commercial entities to accelerate development timelines. Strategic investments by emerging space powers and private enterprises have catalyzed rapid prototyping and iterative testing, further compressing innovation cycles. In parallel, sustainability considerations have begun to influence propellant choices and lifecycle assessments, prompting research into more environmentally benign fuel formulations.

Moreover, the rise of digital twin methodologies and high-fidelity simulation platforms has streamlined validation processes, reducing the number of physical prototypes required and accelerating certification cycles. Autonomous control algorithms and machine learning models are being embedded to optimize combustion stability and throttle response, while advanced manufacturing networks provide modular tooling solutions across geographically dispersed facilities. These combined shifts not only reflect a technological renaissance but also signal an industry-wide prioritization of flexibility and rapid scalability.

This landscape transformation underscores the importance of harmonizing technological capability with regulatory frameworks and strategic alliances. The coming phases of propulsion evolution will hinge on collaborative ecosystems that leverage cross-sector expertise, ensuring that the next generation of rocket engines delivers both superior performance and resilience in an increasingly complex operational environment

Analyzing the Cumulative Effects of United States Tariff Adjustments on Rocket Engine Supply Chains Manufacturing Costs and Strategic Sourcing Decisions

Beginning in early 2025, the implementation of revised tariff structures by the United States has exerted discernible pressure across the rocket engine supply chain, particularly affecting the import of critical raw materials such as high-grade titanium powders and nickel-based superalloys. Components including precision-machined turbo pumps and specialized catalysts have seen escalated costs, prompting prime contractors and subsystem suppliers to reassess procurement strategies. The cumulative effect of these levies has been an upward shift in production expenses, influencing both development budgets and contract negotiations.

In response, industry participants have accelerated efforts to diversify sourcing channels, with some establishing strategic partnerships in allied markets to secure unhindered access to necessary feedstock. A growing emphasis on nearshoring initiatives seeks to localize manufacturing capabilities and reduce exposure to tariff volatility, while a subset of vertically integrated firms has opted to expand in-house material refinement processes. These adjustments signify a broader trend toward supply chain resilience and adaptive operational footprints.

Over the medium term, the residual impact of tariff measures is expected to manifest in refined pricing structures and potential design optimizations aimed at reducing material intensity. Collaborative ventures between engine developers and casting specialists promise to pioneer alternative alloy formulations that balance cost and performance. As stakeholders navigate this evolving policy environment, the emphasis on strategic sourcing and supplier ecosystem strength will remain a critical determinant of competitive positioning in the propulsion sector.

Furthermore, this tariff landscape has accelerated investment in material science research, spurring developments in additive manufacturing powders that circumvent traditional import dependencies. By integrating these emerging powders into advanced production workflows, firms aim to maintain performance benchmarks while mitigating supply chain disruptions and preserving long-term program viability.

Deriving Key Market Segmentation Insights from Propellant Types Thrust Classes Engine Cycles Application Verticals and Stage Configurations

An in-depth examination of propellant type segmentation reveals distinct performance and application profiles. Hybrid propellant systems, combining metalized and polymer-based formulations, continue to appeal for their safety and throttleability advantages, finding particular favor in suborbital vehicles and experimental platforms. Liquid propellant engines, subdivided into cryogenic and hypergolic classes, command attention for high-energy missions such as heavy orbital launches, with cryogenic variants delivering superior specific impulse and hypergolic models prized for reliability in orbital maneuvering systems. Meanwhile, composite and double base solid propellant architectures have retained relevance in missile thrust modules and booster stages, where simplicity and storability underscore mission readiness.

Distinct thrust class segmentation further delineates market opportunities, with high-thrust engines driving demand for crewed and heavy-lift missions, medium-thrust modules serving satellite deployment vehicles, and low-thrust units underlying small satellite propulsion and sustained station keeping. The cycle design of engines comprises expander, gas generator, pressure fed, and staged combustion architectures; the latter's full flow and partial flow iterations have gained momentum in pursuit of enhanced efficiency and reduced turbine loading profiles.

Application-based insights underscore that missile propulsion applications remain critical for defense budgets, while orbital launch segments differentiate across heavy, medium, and small launch vehicles, each responding to unique payload and orbit insertion requirements. Satellite propulsion segments divide into orbit raising and station keeping functions, reflecting lifecycle priorities for geostationary and low Earth orbit assets. Suborbital applications, spanning scientific research and tourism, reinforce diverse thrust demands and system specifications.

Finally, stage count segmentation illuminates trade-offs in mission design, with single-stage-to-orbit concepts pushing engineering boundaries, two- and three-stage configurations underpinning established launch architectures, and multi-stage vehicles beyond three stages offering potential for incremental reusability and payload optimization.

Uncovering Regional Dynamics in Rocket Engine Development Across Americas Europe Middle East Africa and Asia Pacific Paradigms in Demand and Innovation

Regional dynamics in the rocket engine domain present a mosaic of developmental trajectories and strategic priorities. Across the Americas, robust collaboration between governmental space agencies and private enterprises has fostered a fertile environment for rapid prototyping and commercialization. Investment in reusable engine architectures and additive manufacturing facilities has propelled North American entities to the forefront of cost-per-kilogram reduction initiatives, while defense-oriented programs continue to underwrite innovations in hypersonic propulsion and advanced missile systems.

In Europe, Middle East, and Africa, a confluence of sovereign space ambitions and multinational consortia has shaped a diverse propulsion ecosystem. European launch systems benefit from the Ariane program's rigorous certification standards, driving demand for solid and liquid stages that adhere to strict environmental and safety guidelines. Concurrently, Middle Eastern nations are channeling sovereign wealth into indigenous engine development to secure strategic autonomy, while African research institutions explore small-scale solid motors for atmospheric and scientific payload deployment.

Asia-Pacific region stakeholders are charting an aggressive expansion of launch capabilities, underpinned by state-led initiatives and burgeoning private-sector ventures. Mainland Asia has prioritized the upscaling of heavy-lift and reusable engine test facilities, with particular emphasis on liquid oxygen and kerosene cycle engines. In parallel, regional supply chains have matured to support specialized component manufacturing, while collaborative frameworks across national borders are accelerating shared R&D efforts. Together, these regional patterns underscore an increasingly multipolar propulsion market characterized by differentiated capabilities and strategic partnerships.

Profiling Leading Rocket Engine Manufacturers Their Strategic Approaches Technological Capabilities Collaborations and Competitive Advantages

Leading propulsion system manufacturers exhibit a spectrum of strategic approaches and innovation pathways. Established integrators have leveraged deep technical legacies to refine high-thrust liquid engines with advanced turbomachinery and thermal management systems, often securing long-term program contracts through demonstrated reliability and performance margins. Concurrently, emergent firms with agile development models are harnessing additive manufacturing to fabricate complex injector and chamber assemblies, achieving rapid iteration cycles that challenge traditional supply paradigms.

Collaborative ventures have emerged as a central theme, with engine developers partnering with materials specialists to co-develop high-temperature composites and metal alloys optimized for extreme cycle parameters. Such alliances extend to academic institutions and national laboratories, where open innovation frameworks accelerate the maturation of novel propellant chemistries and sensor technologies. Moreover, strategic acquisitions have enabled conglomerates to integrate complementary capabilities, from specialized machining operations to digital analytics platforms, reinforcing end-to-end control over development timelines.

In positioning for future growth, companies are diversifying portfolios across thrust classes and application niches, ensuring that both small satellite propulsion and heavy-lift scenarios are addressed within a unified technology roadmap. Emphasis on lifecycle support services, including remote diagnostics and on-orbit maintenance tools, further differentiates providers in a market where service reliability and total cost of ownership increasingly dictate procurement choices.

Formulating Actionable Recommendations for Industry Leaders to Capitalize on Emerging Rocket Engine Technologies Partnerships and Supply Chain Resilience

Industry leaders seeking to maintain competitive advantage within the propulsion market should prioritize supply chain diversification by forging partnerships with multiple qualified suppliers of critical alloys and additive manufacture powders, reducing exposure to policy-driven constraints. Investments in modular engine architectures will enhance scalability, enabling rapid adaptation to emerging mission profiles and volume requirements without necessitating ground-up redesigns. To accelerate innovation cycles, organizations are advised to integrate model-based systems engineering practices, leveraging digital twins that replicate end-to-end performance metrics and support iterative validation across virtual testbeds.

Collaboration across traditional boundaries can unlock significant efficiencies; co-development agreements with academic research centers and national labs can expedite breakthroughs in materials and propellant chemistry, while public-private consortia enable shared infrastructure for large-scale static and dynamic engine testing. In parallel, establishing a continuous feedback mechanism from field operations to design teams will refine maintenance protocols and inform next-generation engine specifications.

Finally, embedding resilience measures-such as dual-source contracts and regional inventory buffers-will mitigate the impact of future trade policy shifts and logistical disruptions. By coupling these strategic actions with a robust data analytics backbone, companies can derive actionable insights to optimize cost structures, enhance system reliability, and achieve sustainable growth in an increasingly dynamic propulsion landscape.

Detailing a Rigorous Research Methodology Emphasizing Data Collection Synthesis Analytical Frameworks and Validation Processes in Rocket Engine Market

Our research methodology integrates a structured mix of secondary and primary data collection supported by rigorous analytical techniques and validation protocols. The initial phase encompassed an exhaustive review of publicly available technical papers, corporate filings, and policy documents to map the technological and regulatory contours of the propulsion sector. This secondary research was augmented by a systematic examination of patent databases and technical conference proceedings, ensuring that emerging trends in materials, manufacturing processes, and digital integration were comprehensively captured.

Subsequently, primary insights were secured through in-depth interviews with a cross-section of industry stakeholders, including propulsion engineers, supply chain managers, and program directors. These interviews provided firsthand perspectives on strategic priorities, operational challenges, and innovation roadmaps. Data triangulation followed, reconciling secondary findings with primary input to identify consistencies and rectify discrepancies, thereby reinforcing the accuracy and reliability of conclusions.

Analytical frameworks such as scenario analysis and SWOT evaluation underpinned the synthesis of collected data, enabling the assessment of tariff implications, segmentation dynamics, and regional competitive factors. The methodology concluded with a validation workshop, wherein key findings were reviewed by subject matter experts to confirm relevance and refine interpretive statements. This comprehensive approach ensures that the report delivers actionable intelligence aligned with industry imperatives.

Concluding Comprehensive Insights on Rocket Engine Market Trajectories Technological Evolutions and Strategic Pathways for Stakeholders and Innovators

In conclusion, the rocket engine domain is poised at a juncture marked by profound technological advancements, evolving policy landscapes, and intensifying global competition. Material innovations and digital integration are propelling engine performance to new heights, while tariff realignments have underscored the imperative for supply chain resilience and strategic sourcing adaptability. Market segmentation, spanning propellant chemistries, thrust classifications, cycle architectures, application verticals, and stage configurations, offers a nuanced lens through which stakeholders can tailor products to mission-specific demands.

Regional dynamics further complicate the landscape, as North American entities push reusable engine paradigms, EMEA consortiums balance certification rigor with sovereign ambitions, and Asia-Pacific initiatives drive capacity expansion through state-led and private ventures. Within this multifaceted environment, leading companies differentiate themselves via collaborative research alliances, additive manufacturing proficiency, and comprehensive lifecycle support offerings.

Armed with the insights presented, decision-makers can navigate the complexities of design trade-offs, regulatory shifts, and competitive positioning. By embracing flexible development methodologies, strengthening cross-sector partnerships, and maintaining a proactive stance toward emerging market forces, industry participants will be well-equipped to chart sustainable growth pathways and deliver the next generation of propulsion solutions.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

• 2.1. Define: Research Objective
• 2.2. Determine: Research Design
• 2.3. Prepare: Research Instrument
• 2.4. Collect: Data Source
• 2.5. Analyze: Data Interpretation
• 2.6. Formulate: Data Verification
• 2.7. Publish: Research Report
• 2.8. Repeat: Report Update

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Market Sizing & Forecasting

5. Market Dynamics

• 5.1. Growing demand for reusable rocket engines to reduce launch costs
• 5.2. Increasing investments in private space exploration and commercialization
• 5.3. Advancements in 3d printing for rocket engine components
• 5.4. Rise of green propulsion technologies for environmentally friendly launches
• 5.5. Expanding use of hybrid propulsion systems in small launch vehicles
• 5.6. Development of high-thrust electric propulsion systems for deep space missions
• 5.7. Miniaturization of rocket engines for small satellite launchers
• 5.8. Surge in government space programs driving next-generation propulsion innovation
• 5.9. Integration of ai and digital twins for rocket engine design and testing
• 5.10. Increasing collaboration between space agencies and private manufacturers

6. Market Insights

• 6.1. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
• 6.2. PESTLE Analysis

7. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

8. Rocket Engine Market, by Propellant Type

• 8.1. Introduction
• 8.2. Hybrid Propellant
  • 8.2.1. Metalized Propellant
  • 8.2.2. Polymer Based Propellant
• 8.3. Liquid Propellant
  • 8.3.1. Cryogenic Propellant
  • 8.3.2. Hypergolic Propellant
• 8.4. Solid Propellant
  • 8.4.1. Composite Propellant
  • 8.4.2. Double Base Propellant

9. Rocket Engine Market, by Thrust Class

• 9.1. Introduction
• 9.2. High Thrust
• 9.3. Low Thrust
• 9.4. Medium Thrust

10. Rocket Engine Market, by Engine Cycle

• 10.1. Introduction
• 10.2. Expander Cycle
• 10.3. Gas Generator Cycle
• 10.4. Pressure Fed Cycle
• 10.5. Staged Combustion Cycle

11. Rocket Engine Market, by Stage Count

• 11.1. Introduction
• 11.2. More Than Three Stage
• 11.3. Single Stage To Orbit
• 11.4. Three Stage
• 11.5. Two Stage

12. Rocket Engine Market, by Application

• 12.1. Introduction
• 12.2. Missile Propulsion
• 12.3. Orbital Launch
  • 12.3.1. Heavy Launch Vehicle
  • 12.3.2. Medium Launch Vehicle
  • 12.3.3. Small Launch Vehicle
• 12.4. Satellite Propulsion
  • 12.4.1. Orbit Raising Propulsion
  • 12.4.2. Station Keeping Propulsion
• 12.5. Suborbital Launch
  • 12.5.1. Scientific Launch
  • 12.5.2. Tourism Launch

13. Americas Rocket Engine Market

• 13.1. Introduction
• 13.2. United States
• 13.3. Canada
• 13.4. Mexico
• 13.5. Brazil
• 13.6. Argentina

14. Europe, Middle East & Africa Rocket Engine Market

• 14.1. Introduction
• 14.2. United Kingdom
• 14.3. Germany
• 14.4. France
• 14.5. Russia
• 14.6. Italy
• 14.7. Spain
• 14.8. United Arab Emirates
• 14.9. Saudi Arabia
• 14.10. South Africa
• 14.11. Denmark
• 14.12. Netherlands
• 14.13. Qatar
• 14.14. Finland
• 14.15. Sweden
• 14.16. Nigeria
• 14.17. Egypt
• 14.18. Turkey
• 14.19. Israel
• 14.20. Norway
• 14.21. Poland
• 14.22. Switzerland

15. Asia-Pacific Rocket Engine Market

• 15.1. Introduction
• 15.2. China
• 15.3. India
• 15.4. Japan
• 15.5. Australia
• 15.6. South Korea
• 15.7. Indonesia
• 15.8. Thailand
• 15.9. Philippines
• 15.10. Malaysia
• 15.11. Singapore
• 15.12. Vietnam
• 15.13. Taiwan

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 16.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 16.3.1. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
  • 16.3.2. Avio S.p.A.
  • 16.3.3. Airbus SAS
  • 16.3.4. ArianeGroup SAS
  • 16.3.5. IHI Corporation
  • 16.3.6. L3Harris Technologies
  • 16.3.7. Leidos Holdings, Inc.
  • 16.3.8. Moog ISP, Inc.
  • 16.3.9. NAMMO AS
  • 16.3.10. Northrop Grumman Corporation
  • 16.3.11. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
  • 16.3.12. Rocket Lab USA, Inc.
  • 16.3.13. Roketsan A.S.
  • 16.3.14. Sierra Nevada Corporation
  • 16.3.15. Sierra Space Corporation
  • 16.3.16. Skyrora Limited
  • 16.3.17. Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
  • 16.3.18. The Boeing Company
  • 16.3.19. URSA MAJOR TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • 16.3.20. Gilmour Space Technologies Pty Ltd
  • 16.3.21. Deep Blue Aerospace Co., Ltd.

17. ResearchAI

18. ResearchStatistics

19. ResearchContacts

20. ResearchArticles

21. Appendix