![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1832488
心臟麻痹治疗市场(按治疗类型、最终用户、分销管道和年龄组划分)—全球预测 2025-2032Cardiac Arrest Treatment Market by Treatment Type, End User, Distribution Channel, Age Group - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年心臟麻痹治疗市场将成长至 485.3 亿美元,复合年增长率为 9.35%。
| 主要市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年2024年 | 237.3亿美元 |
| 预计2025年 | 259.3亿美元 |
| 预测年份:2032年 | 485.3亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率(%) | 9.35% |
心臟麻痹是急性照护系统中时间最敏感、预后最关键的疾病之一,而近期的临床、技术和政策趋势正在重塑医疗服务模式。生存取决于整个生存链,从快速识别和旁观者反应,到优化的院前干预、先进的院内护理以及復苏后护理。因此,急诊医疗服务、医院、门诊中心和居家照护的相关人员正在重新评估临床路径、采购优先事项、员工能力和技术投资,以改善神经系统预后并降低可预防死亡率。
机械心肺復苏术、自动去心房颤动、植入式去心房颤动技术、复杂的药通讯协定、目标体温管理系统以及日益复杂的监测设备正在汇聚,即时改变临床决策。这些发展,加上不断变化的监管预期以及对互通性和资料收集的日益重视,既带来了机会,也带来了营运挑战。因此,组织领导者必须在短期应对突发事件的准备与长期投资之间取得平衡,以支持韧性、规模化和患者预后显着改善。
在设备工程、数位医疗和基于系统的紧急应变设计等技术的推动下,心臟麻痹护理领域正在经历变革性变革。机械胸外按压系统正变得更加模组化,易于现场部署,即使在恶劣环境和长途转运中也能提供持续、高品质的按压。同时,去心房颤动技术也正向更多样化的方向发展,包括穿戴式解决方案和更智慧的自动体外心臟去心房颤动,这些去颤器整合了演算法心律分析和对急救人员的即时指导。这些设备层面的改进与二氧化碳测量仪和连续心电图等监测技术的更紧密整合成相辅相成,为临床医生提供有关灌注和心律的即时回馈,从而能够快速、循证地调整治疗方案。
同时,药物治疗方案透过迭代临床研究不断完善,目标体温管理系统也正在进行技术和程序优化,以减轻继发性神经损伤。数位转型和数据主导实践正在透过远端医疗平台和预测分析促进早期预警和调度优化,从而缩短回应时间并增强旁观者、急救人员和接收机构之间的协调。最后,培训模式也在不断发展,强调多学科模拟、社区准备和远端教育。这种转变正在重新定义成功指标,重点关注互通性、临床医生工作流程的完整性以及可证明的患者治疗效果,并将其作为采用的核心标准。
2025年美国关税环境为心臟麻痹技术采购、库存计画和跨境供应商关係带来了新的复杂性。影响医疗设备、电子元件和辅助用品的关税正在对整个供应链的成本结构产生直接影响,影响製造商的采购决策,并促使医院和紧急医疗服务的采购团队重新评估供应商合约和合约保护措施。由于关税提高了某些进口组装和成品的到岸价格,製造商被迫重新评估零件采购,考虑其他生产区域,或在短期内吸收成本的同时,在其他地区寻找效率提升的途径。
作为应对,一些战术性行动正在出现。首先,目标商标产品製造商和小型供应商正在加速近岸外包,并扩大国内组装能,以降低贸易政策波动对其的影响。其次,策略性库存实践,包括延长补货週期和关键消耗品的缓衝库存,正变得越来越普遍,甚至不惜牺牲营运成本。第三,采购团队正在重新协商总拥有成本条款,将关税和物流额外费用纳入供应商承诺。这些调整不仅仅是财务方面的;它们透过影响哪些产品组合在有限的成本范围内具有商业性可行性,塑造创新轨迹。
监管和报销条件与关税效应相互作用,共同决定净商业性影响。如果关税导致医疗设备价格上涨,付款人和公共采购者可能会向製造商施压,要求其以可证明的临床效益和长期成本抵消来证明增加的成本是合理的。相反,关税也为国内製造商和製造外包创造了扩大产能和吸引投资的机会,以确保供应的连续性。最后,政策环境本身是动态的。相关人员必须持续关注关税调整、医疗豁免和贸易谈判,以预测週期中期衝击并相应地规划资本投资。从策略角度来看,透过多元化采购、清晰的合约以及产品创新来增强韧性,对于确保关键心臟麻痹技术的可及性至关重要。
了解细分的细微差别可以揭示不同的治疗方式和护理环境如何相互作用,从而影响临床路径、采用动态和采购行为。治疗类型涵盖各种设备,从手动和机械 CPR 系统到各种去心房颤动选项,每个类别都提供临床和操作权衡。机械胸外按压技术,无论是负荷共享袖带装置、活塞驱动系统还是气动背心设计,都解决了在长时间復苏或运输过程中维持高品质按压的挑战,并且它们的采用往往与系统资源、通讯协定标准化和培训能力相关。去心房颤动器包括自动体外心臟去心房颤动、植入式心臟整流去颤器和穿戴式去心房颤动解决方案,每个解决方案都需要不同的部署模型和维护方法来满足不同的用例,从公共场所的突然晕倒到慢性风险管理。
药物治疗仍然是高级心臟生命支持的基石,Amiodarone、肾上腺素和加压素等药物在心律管理和血流动力学支持方面发挥着明确的作用。这些治疗药物与设备选择和体温管理策略相互作用,而低温系统(包括血管内和浅表)在旨在保护神经功能的心臟骤停后护理过程中变得至关重要。二氧化碳测量仪仪和心电图监测仪等监测系统可提供即时调整介入措施所需的临床回馈,强化了整合设备生态系统的角色。
终端用户细分进一步协调了需求和服务要求。医院和急救医疗服务是先进设备和冷却系统的领先采用者,优先考虑耐用性、服务合约和临床医生培训。门诊医疗中心和家庭护理机构越来越重视患者友善穿戴设备,这些设备支援易用性、远端监控功能和长期风险管理。分销通路动态也至关重要。虽然透过医疗经销商和团购进行的传统线下采购对医疗保健买家仍然至关重要,但线上管道因其便利性和更广泛的产品可见性,正在为消费者解决方案和可补充耗材拓展。考虑成人、老年人和儿童等年龄组,可以推动临床通讯协定的差异化、设备尺寸和用药策略。总而言之,细分可以揭示临床需求、采购方式和监管要求影响采用时机和投资优先顺序的融合点。
地区对心臟麻痹技术的监管路径、服务提供模式和商业策略有重大影响。在美洲,成熟的院前急诊系统和大型医院网路为先进设备、综合监测技术和实证通讯协定的采用创造了有利条件。北美医疗保健机构优先考虑与电子健康记录的互通性、急救医疗服务 (EMS) 与医院之间的协调工作流程以及先进的临床培训。同时,采购的复杂性和付款方谈判也影响产品组合的选择和上市后支援的预期。
在欧洲、中东和非洲,我们看到欧盟内部监管协调的混合体,以及其他地区监管架构的比较。高所得的欧洲国家倾向于采用标准化的临床路径并投资于公共可及的去心房颤动项目,而中东的医疗保健市场往往追求快速的产能扩张和先进的临床能力。在非洲部分地区,有限的资源和劳动力短缺推动了对易于维护、坚固耐用且经济高效的解决方案的需求,这为开发客製化设备和培训倡议创造了机会。
亚太地区呈现多元化格局,既有医疗体係高度发展的经济体,也有基础建设快速发展的经济体。都市化、急救医疗服务 (EMS) 网路的不断扩张以及数位医疗的广泛应用,正在加速亚太地区许多地区的数位化进程。该地区的製造能力也融入全球供应链,进而影响采购决策和区域采购惯例。在所有地区,人口老化、心血管危险因子的普遍性以及旁观者心肺復苏术 (CPR) 训练率的差异等人口趋势正在塑造需求强度和特征。因此,区域策略必须使产品设计、服务模式和临床参与与当地监管、经济和劳动力的实际情况一致。
在心臟麻痹护理领域营运的公司正在推行多项相互重迭的策略重点,以保持成长和临床相关性。产品组合多元化至关重要,成功的公司将平衡耐用设备、一次性耗材、治疗和数位服务的投资,从而为医院和急救系统提案一体化的价值主张。与急救护理组织、学术中心和契约製造建立策略伙伴关係通常用于加速产品开发、临床检验和销售扩张。许多领先公司也在扩展其服务范围,例如培训、维护和远端监控,以建立长期合作关係并展示实际成果。
製造布局和供应链架构日益被视为竞争优势。拥有灵活生产能力和多采购节点的组织更有能力应对关税衝击和物流中断。研发投资持续聚焦于微型化、感测器整合、演算法决策支援以及方便一般急救人员和高级临床医生使用。此外,越来越多的公司优先考虑基于结果的证据产生和上市后註册,以记录临床影响并支持报销谈判。策略性倡议涵盖从增加互补技术的定向收购,到提供院前和復苏后护理捆绑解决方案的联盟。这些企业行动反映出从交易型设备销售向强调持续临床价值的服务导向、循证主导的商业模式的广泛转变。
产业领导者必须果断行动,将技术前景转化为持续的临床和商业性影响。首先,投资于供应链韧性和柔性製造,包括近岸外包、多源采购策略和长期供应商合同,可以减少受政策主导的成本衝击和物流瓶颈的影响。其次,优先考虑跨装置和监测系统的互通性和数据标准,可以增强临床工作流程,并支援院前和院内环境中的结果测量。第三,将临床证据生成纳入产品蓝图,包括真实世界註册库和与医疗保健系统的合作试验,可以加强报销定位和临床医生的采用。
第四,透过配套服务、培训计画和基于绩效的合约深化与紧急医疗服务和医院伙伴关係的合作,可以提高持续使用和可衡量成果的可能性。第五,瞄准居家照护和门诊市场,采用以使用者为中心的设备设计和远端监控功能,可以抓住新的需求管道,同时支援照护的连续性。第六,将定价和合约模式与总护理成本核算相结合,包括透过减少神经系统损伤来证明成本抵消,有助于应对付款人的审查。最后,领导者必须制定灵活的监管和上市策略,以预测区域差异并快速实施合规性,确保产品及时推出,并提供适当的临床医生教育和技术支援。
本报告中提出的研究结果和见解是基于一种强调三角测量和透明度的多方法调查方法。主要研究包括对临床医生、急救医疗服务 (EMS) 主管、采购负责人和行业高管进行结构化访谈,以了解现场对设备效用、培训需求和采购挑战的观点。此外,我们还对临床文献、专业协会指南、监管文件和技术规范进行了广泛的专家评审,以补充这些定性信息,确保设备和治疗方法分析基于最新证据。此外,我们也参考了上市后监测和临床註册数据,以验证性能声明并确定医疗机构的采用模式。
我们的分析方法融合了比较产品特征映射、考虑供应链敏感性的情境分析以及专注于近期贸易趋势的政策影响评估。在整个过程中,我们的研究结果与外部临床和行业专家进行了反覆检验,以减少偏差并确保有效性。我们承认有其限制:快速发展的监管决策和新兴的临床研究可能会改变依证,而特定地区的采购惯例可能会引入差异性,从而需要客製化建议。儘管如此,我们方法的严谨性植根于关键相关人员、系统性的文献整合和检验循环,为决策者提供了可行的结论和实用指南。
心臟麻痹护理领域正处于曲折点,技术创新、政策压力和不断发展的服务交付正在汇聚,重新定义临床实践。机械去心房颤动技术、强化监测和先进的治疗方法,使得在整个生存链中实施更一致、数据主导的干预措施成为可能。然而,这些进步只有在建立部署和维持系统的情况下才能有效。采购惯例、培训计划、监管透明度和供应链弹性对于将创新转化为更好的患者预后同样重要。
展望未来,相关人员必须采取整合策略,平衡临床证据与营运准备。製造商应优先考虑可互通、服务导向的解决方案和可靠的证据产生。医疗保健提供者和急救医疗系统必须投资于培训和整合的护理路径,以将设备功能转化为可衡量的成果。政策制定者和付款方必须考虑报销和采购框架,奖励临床验证的技术,同时确保公平的可及性。总而言之,这些相关人员的协同行动将决定新的心臟麻痹治疗方法预期如何持续改善存活率和神经功能恢復。
The Cardiac Arrest Treatment Market is projected to grow by USD 48.53 billion at a CAGR of 9.35% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 23.73 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 25.93 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 48.53 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 9.35% |
Cardiac arrest represents one of the most time-sensitive and outcome-determinant conditions across acute care systems, and recent years have produced a convergence of clinical, technological, and policy developments that are reshaping how care is delivered. Survivability depends on the entire chain of survival, from rapid recognition and bystander response through optimized prehospital interventions, advanced in-hospital therapies, and post-resuscitation care. As a result, stakeholders across emergency medical services, hospitals, ambulatory centers, and home care are reassessing clinical pathways, procurement priorities, workforce competencies, and technology investments to improve neurological outcomes and reduce preventable mortality.
At the same time, innovation is accelerating along multiple vectors: mechanical CPR solutions, automated and implantable defibrillation technologies, refined pharmacologic protocols, targeted temperature management systems, and increasingly sophisticated monitoring equipment are all converging to change clinical decision-making in real time. These developments are accompanied by evolving regulatory expectations and a growing emphasis on interoperability and data capture, which together create both opportunities and operational challenges. Consequently, organizational leaders must balance near-term readiness for acute events with longer-term investments that support resilience, scale, and measurable improvements in patient outcomes.
The cardiac arrest care landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by advances in device engineering, digital health, and systems-based emergency response design. Mechanical chest compression systems have become more modular and field-deployable, enabling consistent high-quality compressions in challenging environments and during prolonged transport. Concurrently, defibrillation technologies are branching into more diverse formats, with wearable solutions and smarter automated external defibrillators that incorporate algorithmic rhythm analysis and real-time guidance for lay responders. These device-level improvements are complemented by tighter integration of monitoring technologies such as capnography and continuous ECG, which provide clinicians immediate feedback on perfusion and rhythm, enabling faster, evidence-based therapeutic adjustments.
In parallel, drug therapy protocols are being refined through iterative clinical research, and targeted temperature management systems have seen both technological and procedural optimization to reduce secondary neurologic injury. Digital transformation and data-driven practices are promoting early-warning and dispatch optimization through telemedicine platforms and predictive analytics, thereby improving response times and coordination between bystanders, EMS, and receiving facilities. Finally, training paradigms are evolving to emphasize multi-disciplinary simulation, community readiness, and remote education, which together create a more resilient emergency response ecosystem. These shifts are redefining the metrics of success-and drawing attention to interoperability, clinician workflow alignment, and demonstrable patient outcomes as the core criteria for adoption.
The tariff environment introduced by the United States in 2025 has introduced a new layer of complexity into procurement, inventory planning, and cross-border supplier relationships for cardiac arrest technologies. Tariff actions that affect medical devices, electronic components, and ancillary supplies have immediate implications for cost structures across the supply chain, influencing manufacturer sourcing decisions and prompting procurement teams at hospitals and EMS services to reassess vendor agreements and contractual protections. As tariffs increase the landed cost of certain imported assemblies and finished goods, manufacturers are incentivized to revisit their component sourcing, consider alternate production geographies, or absorb costs in the short term while seeking efficiencies elsewhere.
In response, several tactical behaviors have emerged. First, original equipment manufacturers and smaller suppliers are accelerating nearshoring and expanding domestic assembly capabilities to mitigate exposure to trade policy volatility. Second, strategic inventory practices, including longer replenishment cycles and buffer stock for critical consumables, are more commonly being adopted, albeit at the expense of working capital. Third, procurement teams are renegotiating total-cost-of-ownership clauses to capture duties and logistical surcharges in supplier commitments. These adjustments are not merely financial; they shape innovation trajectories by influencing which product configurations are commercially viable within constrained cost envelopes.
Regulatory and reimbursement landscapes interact with tariff effects to determine net commercial impact. Where tariffs increase device prices, payers and public purchasers may pressure manufacturers to justify cost increases through demonstrable clinical benefit and long-term cost offsets. Conversely, tariffs have created opportunities for domestic manufacturers and contract manufacturers to expand capacity, attracting investment aimed at ensuring continuity of supply. Finally, the policy environment itself is dynamic: stakeholders must continuously monitor tariff adjustments, exemptions for medical goods, and trade negotiations to anticipate mid-cycle shocks and plan capital investments accordingly. From a strategic perspective, resilience through diversified sourcing and contractual clarity has become as essential as product innovation in safeguarding access to critical cardiac arrest technologies.
A nuanced understanding of segmentation reveals how different treatment modalities and care settings interact to shape clinical pathways, adoption dynamics, and procurement behavior. Within treatment types, devices range from manual and mechanical CPR systems to a spectrum of defibrillation options, and each category presents specific clinical and operational trade-offs. Mechanical chest compression technologies-whether load-distributing band devices, piston-driven systems, or pneumatic vest designs-address the challenge of sustained high-quality compressions in prolonged resuscitation or transport, and adoption tends to correlate with system resources, protocol standardization, and training capacity. Defibrillation spans automated external defibrillators, implantable cardioverter devices, and wearable cardioverter solutions; each fulfills distinct use cases from public-access sudden collapse to chronic risk management, requiring different deployment models and maintenance approaches.
Drug therapies remain a cornerstone of advanced cardiac life support, with agents such as amiodarone, epinephrine, and vasopressin occupying defined roles in rhythm management and hemodynamic support. These therapeutics interplay with device choices and temperature management strategies, with hypothermia systems-both endovascular and surface cooling-becoming integral to post-arrest care pathways that seek to preserve neurologic function. Monitoring systems such as capnography units and ECG monitors provide the clinical feedback necessary to titrate interventions in real time, reinforcing the role of integrated device ecosystems.
End-user segmentation further modulates demand and service requirements. Hospitals and emergency medical services are primary adopters of advanced devices and cooling systems and prioritize durability, service contracts, and clinician training. Ambulatory care centers and home care settings increasingly emphasize ease of use, remote monitoring capabilities, and patient-friendly wearables that support long-term risk management. Distribution channel dynamics are also pivotal: traditional offline procurement through medical distributors and group purchasing remains essential for institutional buyers, while online channels are growing for consumer-facing solutions and replenishable supplies due to convenience and broader product visibility. Age-group considerations-adult, geriatric, and pediatric-drive clinical protocol differentiation, device sizing, and drug dosing strategies, with pediatric applications often requiring specialized training and device adaptations. Taken together, segmentation illuminates where clinical need, procurement style, and regulatory obligations converge to influence adoption timing and investment priorities.
Geography materially influences regulatory pathways, service delivery models, and commercial strategies for cardiac arrest treatment technologies. In the Americas, established prehospital systems and large hospital networks create favorable conditions for advanced devices, integration of monitoring technologies, and adoption of evidence-based protocols. North American institutions frequently emphasize interoperability with electronic health records, coordinated EMS-hospital workflows, and high levels of clinical training. In parallel, procurement complexity and payer negotiations shape product configuration choices and post-market support expectations.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization within the European Union and contrasting regulatory architectures elsewhere create a mixed landscape. High-income European countries tend to adopt standardized clinical pathways and invest in public access defibrillation programs, while Middle Eastern healthcare markets often pursue rapid capacity expansion and advanced clinical capabilities. In parts of Africa, constrained resources and workforce shortages demand solutions that are low-maintenance, rugged, and cost-effective, creating opportunities for tailored devices and training initiatives.
The Asia-Pacific region exhibits substantial heterogeneity, driven by a mix of highly developed healthcare systems in some economies and rapidly upgrading infrastructure in others. Urbanization, expanding EMS networks, and digital health penetration are accelerating adoption in many parts of Asia-Pacific. Manufacturing capacity in the region also feeds global supply chains, which in turn affects sourcing decisions and regional procurement practices. Across all regions, demographic trends such as aging populations, the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, and differences in bystander CPR training rates shape the intensity and character of demand. Consequently, regional strategies must align product design, service models, and clinical engagement to local regulatory, economic, and workforce realities.
Companies operating in the cardiac arrest treatment space are pursuing several overlapping strategic priorities to sustain growth and clinical relevance. Portfolio diversification is central: successful firms balance investments across durable devices, disposable consumables, therapeutics, and digital services to create integrated value propositions for hospitals and EMS systems. Strategic partnerships with emergency care providers, academic centers, and contract manufacturers are commonly used to accelerate product development, clinical validation, and distribution reach. Many leading firms are also expanding service offerings-training, maintenance, and remote monitoring-to lock in long-term relationships and demonstrate real-world outcomes.
Manufacturing footprint and supply chain architecture are increasingly seen as competitive differentiators. Organizations with flexible production capabilities and multiple sourcing nodes are better positioned to absorb tariff shocks and logistic disruptions. Research and development investments continue to focus on miniaturization, sensor integration, algorithmic decision support, and ease of use for both lay rescuers and advanced clinicians. In addition, a growing number of companies are prioritizing outcomes-based evidence generation and post-market registries to document clinical impact and support reimbursement discussions. Strategic moves range from targeted acquisitions that add complementary technologies to collaborations that deliver bundled solutions for prehospital and post-resuscitation care. These corporate behaviors reflect a broader shift from transactional device sales toward service-oriented, evidence-driven commercial models that emphasize sustained clinical value.
Industry leaders must act decisively to translate technological promise into sustained clinical and commercial impact. First, investing in supply chain resilience and flexible manufacturing-whether through nearshoring, multi-sourcing strategies, or long-term supplier agreements-will reduce exposure to policy-driven cost shocks and logistical bottlenecks. Second, prioritizing interoperability and data standards across devices and monitoring systems will enhance clinical workflows and support outcome measurement across prehospital and in-hospital settings. Third, embedding clinical evidence generation into product roadmaps, including real-world registries and collaborative trials with healthcare systems, will strengthen reimbursement positioning and clinician adoption.
Fourth, deepening partnerships with EMS services and hospital networks through bundled service offerings, training programs, and performance-based contracts will increase the likelihood of sustained use and measurable outcomes. Fifth, targeting home care and ambulatory markets with user-centered device designs and remote-monitoring capabilities can capture new demand pathways while supporting continuity of care. Sixth, aligning pricing and contracting models with total-cost-of-care narratives-including demonstrating cost offsets from reduced neurologic disability-will help address payer scrutiny. Finally, leaders should develop agile regulatory and market-access strategies that anticipate regional variances and quickly operationalize compliance, ensuring that product introductions are timely and supported by appropriate clinician education and technical support.
The findings and insights presented in this report are based on a multi-method research approach that emphasizes triangulation and transparency. Primary research included structured interviews with clinicians, EMS directors, procurement officers, and industry executives to capture frontline perspectives on device utility, training needs, and procurement challenges. These qualitative inputs were supplemented by an extensive review of peer-reviewed clinical literature, guidelines from professional societies, regulatory filings, and technical specifications to ground device and therapeutics analysis in contemporary evidence. Where available, post-market surveillance data and clinical registries were consulted to validate performance claims and to contextualize adoption patterns across care settings.
Analytical methodologies incorporated comparative product feature mapping, scenario analysis to examine supply chain sensitivities, and policy impact assessment focused on recent trade developments. Throughout the process, findings were iteratively validated with external clinical and industry experts to reduce bias and ensure relevance. Limitations are acknowledged: rapidly evolving regulatory decisions and emergent clinical studies can shift the evidence base, and localized procurement practices may create heterogeneity that requires customization of recommendations. Nevertheless, the methodological rigor-rooted in primary stakeholder engagement, systematic literature synthesis, and validation loops-supports actionable conclusions and pragmatic guidance for decision-makers.
The cardiac arrest treatment landscape is at an inflection point where technological innovation, policy pressures, and service delivery evolution are converging to redefine clinical practice. Mechanical and defibrillation technologies, enhanced monitoring, and refined therapeutic approaches are collectively enabling more consistent, data-driven interventions across the entire chain of survival. Yet, these advancements are only as effective as the systems that deploy and sustain them; procurement practices, training programs, regulatory clarity, and supply chain resilience are equally critical to converting innovation into improved patient outcomes.
Looking forward, stakeholders must adopt integrated strategies that marry clinical evidence with operational readiness. Manufacturers should prioritize interoperable, service-oriented solutions and robust evidence generation. Providers and EMS systems will need to invest in training and integrated care pathways that translate device capabilities into measurable outcomes. Policymakers and payers must consider reimbursement and procurement frameworks that incentivize clinically proven technologies while ensuring equitable access. Taken together, coordinated action across these constituencies will determine the pace at which the promise of new cardiac arrest treatments produces durable improvements in survival and neurologic recovery.