资料中心电源市场按组件类型、层级类型、资料中心类型和行业垂直划分 - 全球预测 2025-2032

预计到 2032 年资料中心电源市场将成长至 379.2 亿美元，复合年增长率为 8.95%。

它为现代资料中心的电力优先顺序提供了权威指南，并阐明了为什么电力策略决定了设施的性能、成本和永续性结果。

引言部分阐述了稳健、高效且具韧性的电力基础设施对于现代数位化设施至关重要。如今，资料中心正处于运算能力呈指数级增长、脱碳监管压力以及对不间断服务日益增长的期望的关键交汇点。因此，设施所有者、营运商及其供应链必须在资本强度、营运可靠性和环境绩效之间进行复杂的权衡。

在此背景下，电力系统不再只是辅助设施，而是成为影响选址、架构和长期总拥有成本的策略性资产。除了传统的UPS架构和配电设备外，能源效率措施和分散式发电方案也越来越多地被纳入考虑。同时，向边缘部署的转变以及超大规模园区的专业化发展，要求采用差异化设计，并优先考虑模组化和可维护性。

此外，诸如机架密度提升、人工智慧主导的工作负载以及先进的冷却解决方案等技术趋势正在改变负载曲线，并要求更精细的电源监控和管理。因此，采购週期和工程标准必须随之调整，以实现更快的部署计画和更高的生命週期灵活性。本介绍将为深入分析市场格局、动态、竞争考察、区域差异、竞争模式和建议行动奠定基础，其中包括：

密集化、永续性要求、供应链多样化和数位化营运如何重新定义资料中心电力基础设施和策略重点

在技​​术、经济和监管条件融合的推动下，我们正在见证变革时期，它正在重塑资料中心的电力传输、计量和管理方式。首先，不断增长的运算强度，尤其是来自人工智慧训练和推理工作负载的运算强度，正在将电力需求集中到密度越来越高的丛集中，迫使设计人员重新评估配电拓扑和冷却耦合策略。因此，曾经足以满足平均机架密度的系统现在需要升级到母线槽系统、更高容量的配电单元 (PDU) 以及改进的电源监控解决方案。

其次，永续性要求和企业净零排放承诺正在加速自发电、混合能源来源和先进能源管理平台的采用。这种转变迫使营运商整合可再生能源发电、电池储能和智慧控制系统，以平衡可靠性和排放。第三，供应链多元化和地缘政治摩擦正在推动向更长的前置作业时间和关键零件的在地采购转变，从而刺激了对供应商资格确认、设计模组化和标准化介面的投资，以降低中断风险。

第四，透过遥测、预测分析和自动化控制实现电力营运数位化，可以实现更主动的容量规划和故障隔离。随着营运商采用这些功能，他们可以提高可用性，同时消除营运中的运转率。最后，不断变化的法规环境和收费系统为采购和营运模式带来了新的复杂性。总而言之，这些转变正在将电力从后端公用事业转变为决定竞争力和韧性的战略枢纽。

评估美国近期关税对 2025 年电力基础设施采购复杂性、供应商策略和部署计画的分层影响

美国近期关税措施的累积效应将持续到2025年，从而改变电力设备和服务的采购计算、供应商关係以及部署顺序。关税不仅增加了电气元件、电力电子设备和重型设备的进口成本，还放大了发电机、配电单元 (PDU)、不间断电源 (UPS) 系统和辅助开关设备等解决方案的直接成本。这迫使采购团队重新评估筹资策略，权衡更高的进口元件成本和加快本地供应商发展带来的单位成本上升之间的利弊。

此外，关税也会产生副作用，延长供应链时间，因为企业需要重新评估供应商并重新配置物流以避免关税的影响。这些延迟效应凸显了早期供应商参与、允许零件替换的模组化设计以及更明确分配进度风险的合约的重要性。同时，关税主导的价格波动正在刺激一些企业投资国内製造产能，并寻求有利于现成模组化组件和标准化母线槽方案的材料清单方法。

重要的是，电价与更广泛的政策工具相互作用，例如对国内清洁能源和弹性投资的奖励。因此，营运商和整合商正在将政策情境纳入采购决策，优先考虑采购工具的灵活性，并采用分阶段交付模式。这些机制使组织能够管理电价变化的累积影响，同时保护运作和资本规划。

详细的细分揭示了组件选择、层级期望、设施类型和行业特定的合规性如何影响差异化的电力系统决策和采购行为

细分洞察揭示了元件选择、预期层级、资料中心类型和产业需求如何相互作用，从而定义电力系统优先顺序和购买行为。根据组件类型，相关人员区分服务和解决方案。服务着重于设计和咨询、整合和部署以及支援和维护，而解决方案则包括母线槽系统、配电单元 (PDU)、发电机、电力监控和管理设备以及不断电系统。优先考虑託管服务的设施通常会选择涵盖快速部署和预防性保养的生命週期合同，而以解决方案为中心的设施则会投资更高规格的母线槽和 UPS 技术，以满足其更密集的计算空间需求。

目录

第一章：前言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概况

第五章 市场洞察

• 引入液体冷却系统来解决超大规模资料中心日益增加的机架密度
• 可再生现场能源微电网，以减少资料中心的碳排放和能源成本。
• 推出用于动态工作负载和能源优化的人工智慧驱动电源管理平台
• 实作模组化预製资料中心单元，实现快速站点容量扩展
• 增加对燃料电池备用电源解决方案的投资，以永续的高可用性运营
• 利用直流 (DC) 配电架构提高资料中心能源效率
• 扩展边缘基础设施以支援超低延迟 5G 和物联网应用

第六章：2025年美国关税的累积影响

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第 8 章：资料中心电源市场（按组件类型）

• 服务
  • 设计与咨询
  • 整合与部署
  • 支援和维护
• 解决方案
  • 公车专用道系统
  • 电源分配单元（PDU）
  • 发电机
  • 电力监控管理设备
  • 不断电系统（UPS）

第 9 章：资料中心电源市场（依层级类型）

• 第 1 层
• 第 2 层
• 第 3 层
• 第 4 层

第 10 章：资料中心电源市场（按资料中心类型）

• 主机代管资料中心
• 边缘资料中心
• 企业资料中心
• 超大规模资料中心

第 11 章资料中心电源市场（按行业垂直划分）

• 银行、金融服务和保险（BFSI）
• 政府和国防
• 卫生保健
• 资讯科技/通讯
• 製造业
• 媒体与娱乐
• 零售

第 12 章：资料中心电源市场（按地区）

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 欧洲、中东和非洲
  • 欧洲
  • 中东
  • 非洲
• 亚太地区

第 13 章：资料中心电源市场（按类别）

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第 14 章：按国家分類的资料中心电源市场

• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国

第十五章竞争格局

• 2024年市占率分析
• 2024年FPNV定位矩阵
• 竞争分析
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Active Power Solutions Ltd.
  • AEG Power Solutions BV
  • Black Box Corporation
  • Caterpillar Inc.
  • Control Technology Co.
  • Cummins Inc.
  • Cyber Power Systems Inc.
  • Danfoss AS
  • Delta Electronics, Inc.
  • Eaton Corporation
  • Exide Technologies
  • Generac Power Systems, Inc.
  • General Electric Company
  • Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
  • Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
  • Legrand SA
  • Panduit Corp. by Vigilent Corporation
  • Rittal GmbH & Co. KG
  • Rolls Royce Holdings Plc
  • Schneider Electric SE
  • Siemens AG
  • Toshiba Corp.
  • Vertiv Holdings Co.

The Data Center Power Market is projected to grow by USD 37.92 billion at a CAGR of 8.95% by 2032.

A definitive orientation to contemporary data center power priorities clarifying why power strategy now defines facility performance, cost, and sustainability outcomes

The introduction frames the evolving imperative for robust, efficient, and resilient power infrastructure within modern digital facilities. Data centers now occupy a critical position at the intersection of exponential compute growth, regulatory pressure to decarbonize, and rising expectations for uninterrupted service. Consequently, facility owners, operators, and their supply chains must navigate a complex set of trade-offs among capital intensity, operational reliability, and environmental performance.

Against this backdrop, power systems are no longer ancillary utilities but strategic assets that influence site selection, architecture, and long-term total cost of ownership. Energy efficiency measures and distributed generation options increasingly sit alongside traditional UPS architectures and power distribution equipment. In parallel, the shift toward edge deployments and the specialization of hyperscale campuses demand differentiated designs that prioritize modularity and serviceability.

Moreover, technology trends such as higher-density racks, AI-driven workloads, and advanced cooling solutions alter load profiles and demand more granular power monitoring and management. As a result, procurement cycles and engineering standards must adapt to deliver faster deployment timelines and improved lifecycle flexibility. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper analysis of the landscape changes, tariff dynamics, segmentation insights, regional variations, competitive patterns, and recommended actions that follow

How densification, sustainability mandates, supply chain diversification, and digital operations are redefining data center power infrastructure and strategic priorities

The landscape is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technical, economic, and regulatory forces that together reshape how power is delivered, measured, and managed in data centers. First, rising compute intensity-particularly from AI training and inference workloads-has concentrated power demand into ever-denser clusters, which forces designers to re-evaluate power distribution topologies and cooling coupling strategies. Consequently, systems that once sufficed for average rack densities require upgrades to busway systems, higher-capacity PDUs, and improved power monitoring solutions.

Second, sustainability mandates and corporate net-zero commitments have accelerated the adoption of onsite generation, hybridized energy sources, and advanced energy management platforms. This transition compels operators to integrate renewable generation, battery storage, and intelligent control systems to balance reliability with emissions reduction. Third, supply chain diversification and geopolitical friction are prompting longer lead times for critical components and a shift toward local sourcing, spurring investments in supplier qualification, design modularity, and standardized interfaces to mitigate disruption risks.

Fourth, digitalization of power operations via telemetry, predictive analytics, and automated controls enables more proactive capacity planning and fault isolation. As operators adopt these capabilities, they can squeeze inefficiencies from operations while improving uptime. Lastly, evolving regulatory environments and tariff constructs introduce new complexity to procurement and operating models. Taken together, these shifts move power from a backend utility to a strategic axis that determines competitiveness and resilience

Assessing the layered consequences of recent United States tariff actions through 2025 on procurement complexity, supplier strategies, and deployment timelines for power infrastructure

The cumulative effect of recent tariff actions in the United States through 2025 has altered procurement calculus, supplier relationships, and deployment sequencing for power equipment and services. Tariff measures that raise import costs for electrical components, power electronics, and heavy equipment have amplified the direct cost of solutions such as power generators, PDUs, UPS systems, and ancillary switchgear. In response, procurement teams must reassess sourcing strategies, weighing the trade-offs between elevated imported component costs and the higher unit costs of accelerating local supplier development.

Moreover, tariffs have had a secondary impact by elongating supply chain timelines as organizations requalify vendors and reconfigure logistics to avoid exposure. This delay effect increases the importance of early-stage supplier engagement, modular design that tolerates component substitution, and contracts that allocate schedule risk more explicitly. At the same time, tariff-driven price movement has incentivized some players to invest in domestic manufacturing capacity and to pursue alternative bill-of-materials approaches that favor off-the-shelf modular assemblies and standardized busway options.

Importantly, tariffs interact with broader policy levers such as incentives for domestic clean energy and resilience investments, which can mitigate cost impacts when aligned effectively. As a result, operators and integrators increasingly incorporate policy scenarios into sourcing decisions, prioritize flexibility in procurement vehicles, and adopt staged delivery models that allow core capacity to come online while noncritical elements follow. Through these mechanisms, organizations can manage the cumulative effects of tariff changes while protecting uptime and capital plans

Deep segmentation reveals how component choices, tier expectations, facility typologies, and industry-specific compliance shape differentiated power system decisions and procurement behaviors

Segmentation insights reveal how component choices, tier expectations, data center typologies, and industry requirements interact to define power system priorities and purchase behaviors. Based on Component Type, stakeholders differentiate between Services and Solutions; Services emphasize design & consulting, integration & deployment, and support & maintenance while Solutions encompass busway systems, power distribution units (PDUs), power generators, power monitoring and management equipment, and uninterruptible power supply systems. Facilities that prioritize managed Services often opt for lifecycle agreements that cover rapid deployment and preventive maintenance, whereas those focusing on Solutions invest in higher-specification busway and UPS technologies to meet dense compute footprints.

Based on Tier Type, variations across Tier 1 through Tier 4 inform redundancy planning, fault tolerance requirements, and the degree of concurrent maintainability demanded. Higher-tier facilities typically specify more robust UPS topologies, multiple independent feed paths, and enhanced monitoring to minimize single points of failure. Based on Data Center Type, the contrast between colocation data centers, edge data centers, enterprise data centers, and hyperscale data centers drives divergent procurement lead times and modularity preferences; edge sites prioritize compact, quickly commissioned power packages while hyperscale campuses emphasize scalable busway, centralized generators, and sophisticated energy management systems.

Based on Industry Vertical, the spectrum from banking, financial services, and insurance through government & defense, healthcare, IT & telecommunication, manufacturing, media & entertainment, and retail dictates varying service-level expectations and compliance regimes. Regulated verticals tend toward conservative architectures with extensive redundancy and auditability, while digital-native operators may emphasize agility and telemetry-driven operations. Together, these segmentation lenses clarify where suppliers should position offerings and how operators can align technical specifications with commercial objectives

How divergent regional energy policies, grid characteristics, and supply chain ecosystems across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific drive localized power infrastructure strategies

Regional dynamics exert powerful influence over technology selection, regulatory compliance, and supply chain strategies across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, operators balance legacy grid reliability issues with rapid hyperscale growth, leading to a dual focus on resiliency-enhancing generators and scalable busway systems, along with increasing interest in hybrid renewable integration. Transitioning north-south energy policies also affect where capacity expansions occur and how energy contracts are structured, prompting operators to design flexible power infrastructures that can adapt to varying utility tariffs and incentive programs.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory momentum on decarbonization, ambitious grid modernization efforts, and regional variations in grid stability shape investment toward digital power management and localized storage. The MENA region's climate and energy mix elevate cooling-coupled power strategies and favor robust generator deployments for mission-critical sites. Conversely, EMEA jurisdictions with aggressive emissions targets propel uptake of low-carbon onsite generation and tighter PUE objectives.

The Asia-Pacific region features a mix of high-growth hyperscale activity, dense urban edge deployments, and rapidly evolving regulatory frameworks. Supply chain concentration in APAC influences component availability and pricing, while regional industrial policy encourages capacity expansion and domestic manufacturing. Across all regions, operators must reconcile differing regulatory requirements, grid characteristics, and supplier ecosystems to design resilient, cost-effective power infrastructures that align with local business priorities

Competitive landscape dynamics driven by incumbents, integrators, and software-first entrants that accelerate digitization, regional manufacturing, and bundled lifecycle services

Competitive dynamics in the data center power ecosystem reflect a balance between legacy equipment manufacturers, specialized integrators, and emerging technology entrants that focus on software-enabled energy management. Established original equipment manufacturers continue to dominate in large-scale supply of UPS systems, generators, and PDUs due to deep engineering expertise and broad service networks. Nevertheless, integrators and design firms that package solutions with robust lifecycle support services capture substantial value by reducing complexity for end users and accelerating deployment schedules.

New entrants often differentiate through advanced monitoring platforms, power-electronics innovation, and modular prefabricated assemblies that enable rapid edge deployments and simpler scalability. These vendors force incumbents to accelerate digitization roadmaps and to offer interoperable control layers that unify legacy hardware with cloud-native telemetry and analytics. In addition, suppliers that invest in regional manufacturing footprints and parts inventories gain competitive advantage where tariff exposure and lead-time sensitivity are acute.

Strategic partnerships between OEMs, system integrators, and energy service companies are increasingly common, enabling bundled solutions that combine equipment, installation, and performance-based maintenance agreements. For buyers, the landscape rewards suppliers who provide transparent total lifecycle support, predictable service-level commitments, and well-documented interoperability standards that reduce integration risk and shorten commissioning timelines

Practical steps to strengthen resilience and optimize total lifecycle value through modular design, supplier diversification, advanced monitoring, and cross-functional procurement alignment

Actionable recommendations for leaders center on aligning power investments with evolving workload profiles, regulatory shifts, and supply chain realities to safeguard uptime while controlling costs. First, prioritize modular architectures that enable phased capacity expansion and component interchangeability; this reduces schedule risk and permits substitution when tariffs or lead times affect specific vendors. Second, elevate power monitoring and analytics to the core of operations so that predictive maintenance, capacity forecasting, and energy optimization can be managed proactively rather than reactively.

Third, adopt a supplier diversification strategy that balances long-term partnerships with strategic secondary suppliers, including regional manufacturers, to mitigate tariff exposure and shorten delivery windows. Fourth, incorporate policy scenario planning into procurement processes to capture incentives for clean energy and resilience investments while remaining prepared for tariff volatility. Fifth, build cross-functional playbooks that align procurement, engineering, and finance stakeholders on equipment specifications, spare parts strategy, and contingency plans to accelerate decision cycles and reduce project delays.

Finally, invest in skills and processes that support digital operations, such as automation of routine fault responses and remote commissioning capabilities, to reduce operational complexity across distributed sites. By implementing these steps, leaders can strengthen their resilience to external shocks, improve lifecycle economics, and extract more value from their power infrastructure investments

A methodology combining expert interviews, technical standards review, and supply chain diagnostics reinforced by scenario analysis to validate practical, risk-aware conclusions

The research methodology integrates qualitative expert interviews, technical literature synthesis, and granular supply chain diagnostics to ensure robust, actionable findings. Primary inputs include structured interviews with design engineers, procurement leaders, and operations managers across a representative set of data center operators, integrators, and equipment providers, allowing the study to capture real-world trade-offs in specification, deployment, and maintenance. Complementing these interviews, the methodology reviews technical standards, regulatory filings, and white papers that inform best practices for redundancy topologies, energy management, and resiliency testing.

In parallel, supply chain diagnostics map component sourcing patterns, lead-time trends, and manufacturing footprints to identify where tariff exposure and capacity constraints are most acute. This analysis leverages bill-of-material comparisons and procurement contract archetypes to highlight vulnerability points and mitigation strategies. Scenario analysis is employed to stress-test operational decisions against variables such as tariff shifts, regional grid performance, and accelerated compute density, which helps translate findings into practical risk management approaches.

Throughout, the research applies triangulation to validate conclusions, ensuring that qualitative insights align with observable procurement behaviors and documented technical specifications. Executive summaries and technical appendices provide traceable evidence for each major conclusion, enabling readers to interrogate assumptions and adapt recommendations to their unique operational circumstances

A final synthesis underscoring power infrastructure as a strategic platform that demands modularity, supplier diversity, and operational digitization to secure resilience and sustainability

In conclusion, power infrastructure now functions as a strategic differentiator for digital infrastructure operators rather than a background utility component. The convergence of densifying compute workloads, sustainability mandates, supply chain complexity, and tariff dynamics compels organizations to rethink procurement, design, and operational practices. Operators that adopt modular architectures, strengthen supplier diversity, and embed advanced monitoring will be better positioned to manage risk and accelerate deployment timelines while meeting resilience and environmental goals.

Furthermore, regional nuances in policy, grid stability, and manufacturing capacity require site-specific strategies that mesh corporate objectives with local realities. Organizations should therefore prioritize flexible design principles and contractual mechanisms that allow them to pivot in response to changing tariffs and supplier availability. Finally, aligning cross-functional teams around shared specifications and lifecycle objectives reduces friction and shortens time to service, enabling businesses to extract more predictable value from their power investments.

Taken together, these themes underscore the need for deliberate, forward-looking approaches to power strategy that treat infrastructure as a platform for operational excellence and sustainability. The recommendations and insights provided in this report aim to help decision-makers translate these imperatives into concrete actions that safeguard continuity, reduce complexity, and support long-term strategic goals

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Adoption of liquid cooling systems to manage rising rack densities in hyperscale data centers
• 5.2. Integration of renewable on-site energy microgrids to reduce data center carbon footprint and energy costs
• 5.3. Deployment of AI-driven power management platforms for dynamic workload and energy optimization
• 5.4. Implementation of modular prefabricated data center units for rapid site capacity expansion
• 5.5. Increasing investment in fuel cell backup power solutions to achieve sustainable high-availability operations
• 5.6. Utilization of direct current (DC) power distribution architectures to improve data center energy efficiency
• 5.7. Expansion of edge data center power infrastructures to support ultra-low latency 5G and IoT applications

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Data Center Power Market, by Component Type

• 8.1. Services
  • 8.1.1. Design & Consulting
  • 8.1.2. Integration & Deployment
  • 8.1.3. Support & Maintenance
• 8.2. Solutions
  • 8.2.1. Busway Systems
  • 8.2.2. Power Distribution Units (PDUs)
  • 8.2.3. Power Generators
  • 8.2.4. Power Monitoring and Management Equipment
  • 8.2.5. Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

9. Data Center Power Market, by Tier Type

• 9.1. Tier 1
• 9.2. Tier 2
• 9.3. Tier 3
• 9.4. Tier 4

10. Data Center Power Market, by Data Center Type

• 10.1. Colocation Data Centers
• 10.2. Edge Data Centers
• 10.3. Enterprise Data Centers
• 10.4. Hyperscale Data Centers

11. Data Center Power Market, by Industry Vertical

• 11.1. Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI)
• 11.2. Government & Defense
• 11.3. Healthcare
• 11.4. IT & Telecommunication
• 11.5. Manufacturing
• 11.6. Media & Entertainment
• 11.7. Retail

12. Data Center Power Market, by Region

• 12.1. Americas
  • 12.1.1. North America
  • 12.1.2. Latin America
• 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 12.2.1. Europe
  • 12.2.2. Middle East
  • 12.2.3. Africa
• 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Data Center Power Market, by Group

• 13.1. ASEAN
• 13.2. GCC
• 13.3. European Union
• 13.4. BRICS
• 13.5. G7
• 13.6. NATO

14. Data Center Power Market, by Country

• 14.1. United States
• 14.2. Canada
• 14.3. Mexico
• 14.4. Brazil
• 14.5. United Kingdom
• 14.6. Germany
• 14.7. France
• 14.8. Russia
• 14.9. Italy
• 14.10. Spain
• 14.11. China
• 14.12. India
• 14.13. Japan
• 14.14. Australia
• 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

• 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 15.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 15.3.1. ABB Ltd.
  • 15.3.2. Active Power Solutions Ltd.
  • 15.3.3. AEG Power Solutions BV
  • 15.3.4. Black Box Corporation
  • 15.3.5. Caterpillar Inc.
  • 15.3.6. Control Technology Co.
  • 15.3.7. Cummins Inc.
  • 15.3.8. Cyber Power Systems Inc.
  • 15.3.9. Danfoss AS
  • 15.3.10. Delta Electronics, Inc.
  • 15.3.11. Eaton Corporation
  • 15.3.12. Exide Technologies
  • 15.3.13. Generac Power Systems, Inc.
  • 15.3.14. General Electric Company
  • 15.3.15. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
  • 15.3.16. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
  • 15.3.17. Legrand S.A.
  • 15.3.18. Panduit Corp. by Vigilent Corporation
  • 15.3.19. Rittal GmbH & Co. KG
  • 15.3.20. Rolls Royce Holdings Plc
  • 15.3.21. Schneider Electric SE
  • 15.3.22. Siemens AG
  • 15.3.23. Toshiba Corp.
  • 15.3.24. Vertiv Holdings Co.