![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1850517
聚酰胺6射出成型市场:依应用、增强类型、等级类型、最终用途零件和销售管道-全球预测,2025-2032年Injection Molding Polyamide 6 Market by Application, Reinforcement Type, Grade Type, End Use Components, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,射出成型成型聚酰胺 6 市场将成长至 144 亿美元,复合年增长率为 6.66%。
| 关键市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年 2024 | 85.9亿美元 |
| 预计年份:2025年 | 91.6亿美元 |
| 预测年份 2032 | 144亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率 (%) | 6.66% |
聚酰胺6射出成型仍是生产各种工业领域耐用、高性能聚合物零件的关键製程。这种材料兼具机械强度、耐热性和化学稳定性,使其适用于对尺寸精度和长期性能要求极高的应用。随着製造商不断追求更轻的组装、更高的工作温度和更优异的耐磨性能,聚酰胺6仍然是必须承受机械应力和恶劣工作环境的零件的首选工程聚合物。
要了解聚酰胺6在现代製造业中的作用,必须考虑树脂化学性质、增强系统和加工通讯协定如何相互作用,从而决定零件的性能。改变聚合物牌号或引入不同的增强类型会影响流动特性、生产週期和最终的机械性能。同样,模具设计和製程控制的精确度决定了一级供应商和原始设备製造商(OEM)所需的重复性。因此,製造商越来越倾向于在选择材料规格时,兼顾生命週期、可修復性和最终用途性能要求,同时还要满足不断变化的监管和永续性期望。
此外,供应链动态仍是生产计画的核心。原料供应、投入限制和物流因素都会影响前置作业时间和生产计画的稳定性。为此,策略参与者优先考虑与树脂供应商的合作,投资于材料资格确认项目,并采取风险管理措施,以确保在不降低工程标准的前提下,供应的连续性。综上所述,这些因素凸显了射出成型用聚酰胺6的商业环境,并强调了整合技术和商业性决策的重要性。
技术、监管环境和市场力量的融合正在改变射出成型用聚酰胺6的市场格局。例如,电动化趋势正在重新定义零件的热性能和电气性能要求,促使注塑成型商开发具有更高耐热性和电稳定性的聚酰胺6。同时,对永续性的期望推动了对再生原料和生物基单体的投资,这些原料和单体正与传统原生树脂一起被考虑用于减少产品生命週期的环境足迹。
同时,製造技术的进步正在重塑生产经济格局和设计可能性。先进的模具设计、模拟主导的製程最佳化以及自动化和线上品质检测技术的日益普及,使得更严格的公差、更低的废品率和更快的零件量推出成为可能。积层製造也正在与射出成型製程相结合,实现了快速原型製作,用于设计检验,并为以前难以实现的复杂几何形状提供了混合生产策略。这些能力,结合客製化玻璃纤维含量和新型奈米复合材料等材料创新,在提升性能的同时,也促使工程师重新调整认证通讯协定。
此外,监管压力和客户期望正推动透明的材料声明和完善的报废处理策略。因此,企业正在将循环性指标纳入产品蓝图,探索玻璃纤维增强系统的机械回收途径,并建立回收和再製造试点计画。由此可见,这种变革性的转变并非技术更新,而是影响整个价值链的采购、产品架构和合作伙伴选择的系统性变革。
关税和贸易政策调整的实施对射出成型用聚酰胺6生态系统产生了连锁反应,各相关人员必须评估其采购、製造和产品策略的累积影响。当聚合物原料或成品的进口关税提高时,买家通常会面临更高的到岸成本和更长的前置作业时间。为此,许多公司正在重新审视其供应商网络,优先考虑地域多元化,并加快对替代树脂来源的认证,以减少对单一贸易走廊的依赖。虽然这些措施可以降低脆弱性,但也增加了物流和认证流程的复杂性。
关税将影响资本配置决策以及直接的采购决策。在贸易措施对其竞争力造成显着影响的地区,企业可能会重新评估其模具投资和产能扩张计画。从长远来看,随着製造商寻求将生产基地与消费市场相匹配以最大限度地减少跨境关税的影响,供应链区域化可能会受到鼓励。虽然区域化可以提高韧性,但也可能导致产能重迭和固定成本上升,因此需要进行週详的方案规划和投资优先排序。
此外,关税往往会凸显供应链透明度和策略供应商关係的重要性。那些能够维持协同预测、共用资讯透明度并做出长期采购承诺的买家,在外部贸易压力加剧时,更有能力协商价格结构并确保可靠的配额。最后,由于成本压力促使设计更加註重材料效率、在性能允许的情况下进行替代,以及材料科学家和设计工程师之间加强合作以在控制总落地成本的同时保持产品性能,产品工程决策也会受到影响。因此,关税的累积影响既应被视为一项商业性挑战,也应被视为采购和产品开发策略进行策略调整的催化剂。
本报告重点阐述了射出成型聚酰胺6零件在技术和商业性最具优势的领域。应用需求涵盖汽车、消费品、电气电子、工业设备和医疗等行业,其中汽车领域的需求进一步细分为外饰件、内饰件和发动机舱部件,不同细分领域的热性能和阻燃性能要求也各不相同。每种最终用途都对性能和法规有特定的要求,这些要求指南树脂的选择、增强策略和检验通讯协定。
增强材料的类型也是至关重要的区别因素。玻璃纤维增强材料在高玻璃纤维含量下具有良好的刚度和尺寸稳定性,其性能特征因玻璃纤维含量的不同而有所差异,例如玻璃纤维含量为30%以上、20-30%和10-20%等。矿物填充和橡胶增强系统则需要在刚度、抗衝击性和加工性能之间进行权衡。因此,材料工程师必须在选择增强材料时,权衡其对加工性能的影响以及最终用途的耐久性要求。
牌号选择,无论是共聚物或均聚物,都会影响耐化学性、结晶度和热性能。共聚物牌号可进一步开发成奈米复合材料和PA 6-6共聚物配方,以提高高温性能并客製化机械性能。连接器、齿轮和轴承、壳体和盖、叶轮和风扇叶片等终端部件,各自具有特定的性能要求,这些要求会影响牌号选择和加工参数。最后,售后市场和OEM通路(OEM通路本身又分为汽车、消费品和工业售后市场)之间的销售管道动态会影响批量大小、认证要求和可追溯性预期,进而影响包装、文件和客户支援模式。
区域动态为美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的聚酰胺6製造商和加工商创造了不同的营运环境。在美洲,由于靠近原料产地且拥有成熟的汽车供应链,原始设备製造商(OEM)和供应商之间能够快速迭代并紧密合作。因此,北美和南美的供应链策略通常强调短期回应时间和与能够满足短前置作业时间的供应商伙伴关係。
在欧洲、中东和非洲,日益增长的监管压力和永续性要求正在影响原材料资讯揭露和生命週期管理实践。该地区的製造商面临严格的合规要求,这影响着配方选择和文件记录,而他们的客户群则高度重视产品的可回收性和认证。因此,在该地区运营的供应商优先考虑有效的回收管道、供应商可追溯性以及与全球法规结构的一致性。相较之下,亚太地区仍然是树脂生产和组件製造的中心,拥有具有竞争力的成本结构和规模优势。然而,不断增长的本地需求、不断变化的人事费用动态以及区域贸易政策正迫使供应商和加工商重新调整产能分配和技术投资的优先顺序,以保持竞争力。
综上所述,这些区域性洞察凸显了根据当地情况调整商业性和技术策略的必要性。透过在地化的资质认证专案、策略性的库存布局以及对自动化领域的定向投资,使本地执行与全球产品和永续性目标保持一致的企业,将更有利于把握机会,同时有效应对地缘政治和供应链的不确定性。
产业参与者正透过创新、垂直整合和策略合作相结合的方式来应对竞争压力。领先的树脂供应商和加工商正在拓展其技术服务能力,并投资建造应用实验室和随线分析设施,以加快零件认证速度并缩短生产週期。同时,下游製造商正与材料製造商进行更紧密的合作,共同开发满足特定热性能、机械性能和重量目标的配方,从而加快检验週期,并儘早成本和性能之间的权衡达成协议。
其他商业策略包括对回收和再加工能力进行定向投资,使企业能够建立自己的原材料流并加强对材料来源的控制。部分企业正在寻求价值链整合,包括确保稳定的树脂供应、增加混合能力以及将关键的成型工序内部资源生产,从而保护利润率并降低对外部供应波动的依赖。同时,契约製造製造商和一级供应商正透过提供诸如准时交货、支援可製造设计以及为受监管应用提供更完善的文件等服务来实现差异化竞争。
最后,对永续性资质和供应链透明度的重视正成为竞争中的通用差异化因素。能够证明其生产过程中使用了经认证的回收材料、实施了闭合迴路计划并降低了碳排放强度的公司,正获得优先考虑产品生命週期绩效的原始设备製造商 (OEM) 和采购团队的商业性支援。诸如此类的策略选择正在影响企业如何投资自身能力,以及如何调整产品组合以适应未来的需求变化。
行业领导者应采取综合策略,结合采购弹性、材料创新和卓越运营,以应对当前和未来可能出现的挑战。首先,透过树脂供应商多元化和地域性采购降低集中风险。此外,还应制定多供应商资格认证计划,以便在不影响产品上市的情况下启用替代原料。同时,企业应加强协同预测和供应商库存管理,以提高分配确定性并降低紧急采购溢价。
其次,对材料循环利用和有效回收途径的投资正成为一项战略要务。各组织应在条件允许的情况下试行玻璃纤维增强系统的机械回收流程,同时评估针对混合和受污染废弃物的化学回收合作伙伴。同时,应透过应用层级的测试检验采用生物基原料的可行性,以确保其性能达到预期水准。第三,产品工程师应在设计时注重废弃物效率和易于拆卸性,以在保持性能的同时减少生命週期影响。重新设计倡议可以减少树脂消费量,并在不影响功能性的前提下提高可回收性。
在营运方面,自动化和先进的製程控制是提高产量并维持品质的关键。企业应实施线上检测、流程监控和数位化追溯,以缩短资格确认週期并降低缺陷率。最后,在组织方面,企业应组成跨职能团队,汇集采购、工程、永续性和法规方面的专业知识,以确保策略决策是基于对技术风险和商业机会的全面考量。
调查方法结合了定性相关人员参与、针对性技术评估和情境分析,旨在得出可操作的见解。主要研究工作包括对材料科学家、产品工程师、采购负责人和工厂营运经理进行结构化访谈,以获取关于树脂性能、认证时间表和供应链限制的第一手观点。这些访谈凸显了一些反覆出现的主题,例如增强材料的权衡取舍、牌号选择压力和区域实施挑战,这些主题为后续分析的重点提供了依据。
技术评估包括对关键性能属性进行实验室验证,以及对代表性聚酰胺6配方的加工窗口检验检验对成型操作的实际影响。情境分析考虑了贸易政策变化、区域产能变化以及再生原料使用等潜在影响,为在不同外部条件下评估策略选择提供了框架。
最后,透过与多个行业资讯来源进行交叉检验和反覆的同行评审,对研究结果进行三角验证,以确保其稳健性。考虑到本调查方法的局限性,例如专有方法的差异和不断变化的贸易环境,其设计重点在于可复製的诊断标准和情境规划,而非点估计。这种结构化的方法既能提供可靠的建议,又能使组织根据自身独特的营运情况调整研究结果。
这种整合凸显了射出成型聚酰胺6的动态环境,其中技术创新与商业策略紧密相连。增强策略和共聚物开发的材料进步使零件能够满足日益严格的热性能和机械性能要求,而自动化和模拟方面的製造创新则提高了零件的一致性并缩短了开发週期。同时,贸易政策调整和日益增长的永续性期望等外部压力正促使企业重新思考其采购足迹并加快循环材料计划的实施。
对决策者而言,其意义显而易见:卓越的技术必须透过策略性的供应链设计和透明的永续性规划来实现。整合材料科学、设计最佳化和敏捷采购的企业将更有能力应对衝击,并掌握终端用户需求变化所带来的机会。展望未来,本地生产韧性和规模经济之间的平衡将决定企业如何配置产能和优先投资。最终,在射出成型聚酰胺6领域,那些采用严谨的跨职能方法进行材料认证和策略采购的企业将获得可持续的竞争优势。
The Injection Molding Polyamide 6 Market is projected to grow by USD 14.40 billion at a CAGR of 6.66% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 8.59 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 9.16 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 14.40 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 6.66% |
Injection molding of polyamide six continues to be a cornerstone process for producing durable, high-performance polymer components across multiple industrial sectors. The material's balance of mechanical strength, thermal resistance, and chemical stability makes it suited to demanding applications that require dimensional accuracy and consistent long-term performance. As manufacturers push for lighter assemblies, higher service temperatures, and improved wear characteristics, polyamide six has remained a preferred engineering polymer for parts that must withstand mechanical stress and exposure to aggressive service environments.
To understand the role of polyamide six in contemporary manufacturing, it is important to consider how resin chemistry, reinforcement systems, and processing protocols interact to determine part behavior. Changes in polymer grade and the introduction of various reinforcement types influence flow characteristics, cycle times, and final mechanical attributes. Likewise, the design of tooling and the precision of process controls determine the repeatability that tier suppliers and OEMs require. Consequently, manufacturers are increasingly aligning material specification choices with lifecycle considerations, repairability, and end use performance demands, while also seeking compatibility with evolving regulatory and sustainability expectations.
Moreover, supply chain dynamics remain central to production planning. Raw material availability, feedstock feed-in constraints, and logistical considerations influence lead times and the resilience of production schedules. In response, strategic actors have been prioritizing collaborative relationships with resin suppliers, investing in material qualification programs, and adopting risk management approaches that preserve continuity of supply without compromising engineering standards. Taken together, these factors frame the operating context for polyamide six injection molding and underscore the importance of integrated technical and commercial decision making.
The landscape of polyamide six injection molding is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, regulatory, and market forces. Electrification trends in mobility, for instance, are redefining component thermal and electrical demands, prompting formulators to develop higher temperature resistant and electrically stable polyamide six variants. Simultaneously, sustainability expectations are catalyzing investment in recycled feedstocks and bio-derived monomers, which are being considered alongside traditional virgin resins to reduce lifecycle environmental footprints.
In parallel, manufacturing technologies are reshaping production economics and design possibilities. Advanced mold design, simulation-led process optimization, and greater adoption of automation and in-line quality inspection are allowing tighter tolerances, reduced scrap, and faster ramp-up of new parts. Additive manufacturing is also intersecting with injection molding workflows, enabling rapid prototyping for design validation and hybrid production strategies for complex geometries that were previously impractical. These capabilities, combined with material innovations such as tailored glass fiber loading and novel nanocomposite approaches, are enabling performance gains while challenging engineers to recalibrate qualification protocols.
Furthermore, regulatory pressures and customer expectations are encouraging transparent material declarations and documented end of life strategies. As a result, firms are integrating circularity metrics into product roadmaps, investigating mechanical recycling pathways for glass fiber reinforced systems, and establishing takeback or remanufacturing pilots. Therefore, the transformative shifts are not isolated technical updates but systemic changes that influence sourcing, product architecture, and partner selection across the value chain.
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy adjustments has a cascading effect on the injection molding polyamide six ecosystem, and stakeholders must evaluate the cumulative implications across procurement, manufacturing, and product strategy. When import duties rise on polymer feedstocks or finished components, buyers typically face higher landed costs and extended lead times. In response, many companies reexamine supplier networks, prioritize geographic diversification, and accelerate qualification of alternate resin sources to mitigate exposure to a single trade corridor. These actions can reduce vulnerability but also introduce complexity in logistics and qualification timelines.
Beyond immediate procurement effects, tariffs influence capital allocation decisions. Firms may reassess plans for tooling investments or capacity expansions in geographies where trade measures have materially affected competitiveness. Over time, this can encourage regionalization of supply chains as manufacturers seek to align production footprints with consumption markets to minimize cross-border tariff impacts. While regionalization can improve resilience, it can also lead to duplication of capabilities and elevated fixed costs, which require careful scenario planning and investment prioritization.
Additionally, tariffs tend to amplify the value of supply chain transparency and strategic supplier relationships. Buyers that maintain collaborative forecasting, shared visibility, and long-term purchasing commitments are better positioned to negotiate pricing structures and secure reliable allocations when external trade pressures intensify. Finally, product engineering decisions are affected as cost pressures prompt design for material efficiency, substitution where performance allows, and increased collaboration between materials scientists and design engineers to sustain performance while managing total landed cost. Consequently, the cumulative impact of tariffs should be viewed as both a commercial challenge and a catalyst for strategic realignment in sourcing and product development approaches.
A nuanced segmentation lens clarifies where technical and commercial opportunities are most pronounced for polyamide six injection molded parts. Application-based demand spans automotive, consumer goods, electrical and electronics, industrial equipment, and medical sectors, with automotive needs further subdivided into exterior, interior, and under the hood components where thermal performance and flame resistance often vary by subsegment. Each end use imposes specific performance and regulatory constraints that guide resin selection, reinforcement strategies, and validation protocols.
Reinforcement type is another crucial differentiator. Glass fiber reinforced formulations offer stiffness and dimensional stability at higher glass loadings, with performance characteristics that vary across categories such as above thirty percent glass fiber content, twenty to thirty percent glass fiber content, and ten to twenty percent glass fiber content. Mineral filled and rubber toughened systems present alternative tradeoffs between rigidity, impact resistance, and machining behavior, while unfilled grades deliver better surface finish and lower density for less demanding applications. Materials engineers must therefore balance reinforcement choice with processing implications and end use durability requirements.
Grade selection, whether copolymer or homopolymer, has material consequences for chemical resistance, crystallinity, and thermal behavior. Copolymer grades have been further developed into nanocomposite variants and PA six six copolymer formulations that target improved high temperature performance and tailored mechanical profiles. End use components such as connectors, gears and bearings, housings and covers, and impellers and fan blades each demand specific property sets that influence grade choice and molding parameters. Finally, sales channel dynamics between aftermarket and OEM channels-where the aftermarket itself splits into automotive aftermarket, consumer aftermarket, and industrial aftermarket-affect batch sizes, certification requirements, and traceability expectations, thereby influencing packaging, documentation, and customer support models.
Regional dynamics create differentiated operating conditions for polyamide six manufacturers and converters across the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia-Pacific regions. In the Americas, proximity to feedstock producers and an established automotive supply chain support rapid iteration and close collaboration between OEMs and suppliers; however, logistics bottlenecks and regional trade measures can introduce variability in delivery performance that firms must actively manage. As a result, North and South American supply chain strategies often emphasize near-term responsiveness and supplier partnerships that can accommodate short lead times.
Across Europe, Middle East and Africa, regulatory rigor and sustainability mandates are shaping material disclosure and lifecycle management practices. Manufacturers in this region face stringent compliance requirements that affect formulation choices and documentation, while the customer base places a premium on proven recyclability and certifications. Consequently, suppliers operating here prioritize validated recycling streams, supplier traceability, and compatibility with global regulatory frameworks. In contrast, the Asia-Pacific region remains a hub for resin production and component manufacturing, supporting competitive cost structures and scale. Nevertheless, growing local demand, shifts in labor cost dynamics, and regional trade policies are prompting suppliers and converters to reassess capacity allocation and technological investment priorities to maintain competitiveness.
Taken together, these regional insights highlight the necessity of tailoring commercial and technical strategies to local conditions. Whether through localized qualification programs, strategic inventory positioning, or targeted investments in automation, firms that align regional execution with global product and sustainability objectives will be better positioned to capture opportunities while managing exposure to geopolitical and supply chain uncertainties.
Industry participants are responding to competitive pressures through a mix of innovation, vertical integration, and strategic collaboration. Leading resin suppliers and converters are expanding their technical service capabilities, investing in application laboratories and in-line analytics to accelerate part qualification and reduce time to production. At the same time, downstream manufacturers are forming tighter alliances with material houses to co-develop formulations that meet specific thermal, mechanical, and weight targets, enabling faster validation cycles and earlier alignment on cost and performance tradeoffs.
Other commercial strategies include targeted investments in recycling and reprocessing capabilities, which create proprietary feedstock streams and improve control over material provenance. Select firms are pursuing integration across the value chain-securing stable resin supplies, adding compounding capabilities, or insourcing critical molding operations-to capture margin and reduce exposure to external supply volatility. Parallel to these moves, contract manufacturers and Tier suppliers are differentiating through service offerings such as just-in-time deliveries, design for manufacturability support, and enhanced documentation for regulated applications.
Finally, across the competitive set, emphasis on sustainability credentials and supply chain transparency has become a common differentiator. Companies that can demonstrate verified recycled content, closed-loop initiatives, or reduced carbon intensity across production are finding commercial traction with OEMs and procurement teams that prioritize lifecycle performance. These strategic choices are shaping how firms invest in capabilities and position their portfolios for future demand shifts.
Industry leaders should adopt an integrated approach that combines sourcing resilience, materials innovation, and operational excellence to navigate current and emerging challenges. First, diversification of resin suppliers and geographic sourcing reduces concentration risk; this should be complemented by multi-sourced qualification plans that allow for alternate feedstock activation without disrupting product launches. In tandem, firms should strengthen collaborative forecasting and vendor managed inventory arrangements to improve allocation certainty and reduce emergency procurement premiums.
Second, investment in material circularity and validated recycling pathways is becoming a strategic imperative. Organizations should pilot mechanical recycling streams for glass fiber reinforced systems where feasible, while also evaluating chemical recycling partners for mixed or contaminated waste streams. Parallel efforts to adopt bio-based feedstock variants should be validated through application-level testing to ensure parity with incumbent performance expectations. Third, product engineers should prioritize design for material efficiency and ease of disassembly to lower lifecycle impacts while maintaining performance. Redesign initiatives can reduce resin consumption and enable higher recycled content without compromising functionality.
Operationally, automation and advanced process control are key to maintaining quality while improving throughput. Companies should deploy in-line inspection, process monitoring, and digital traceability to shorten qualification cycles and reduce defect rates. Finally, organizationally, firms should cultivate cross-functional teams that bring procurement, engineering, sustainability, and regulatory expertise together to ensure that strategic decisions are informed by a holistic view of technical risk and commercial opportunity.
The research approach combined qualitative stakeholder engagement, targeted technical evaluation, and scenario-based analysis to generate actionable insights. Primary research included structured interviews with material scientists, product engineers, procurement leaders, and plant operations managers to capture firsthand perspectives on resin performance, qualification timelines, and supply chain constraints. These conversations were used to surface recurring themes related to reinforcement tradeoffs, grade selection pressures, and regional execution challenges, which informed subsequent analytical priorities.
Technical evaluation incorporated laboratory verification of key performance attributes and review of processing windows for representative polyamide six formulations. Where possible, comparative assessments of glass fiber loadings and copolymer versus homopolymer behaviors were synthesized from public technical literature and anonymized supplier data to validate practical implications for molding operations. Scenario analysis explored potential impacts of trade policy shifts, regional capacity changes, and uptake of recycled feedstocks, providing a framework to assess strategic options under differing external conditions.
Finally, findings were triangulated through cross-validation with multiple industry sources and through iterative review with subject matter experts to ensure robustness. Limitations of the study are acknowledged, including variability in proprietary formulations and evolving trade landscapes, and the methodology was therefore designed to emphasize replicable diagnostic criteria and scenario planning rather than point estimates. This structured approach supports credible recommendations while allowing organizations to adapt insights to their specific operating contexts.
The synthesis highlights a dynamic environment for polyamide six injection molding in which technical innovation and commercial strategy are tightly coupled. Material advancements in reinforcement strategies and copolymer developments are enabling parts to meet increasingly stringent thermal and mechanical demands, while manufacturing innovations in automation and simulation are improving part consistency and shortening development cycles. At the same time, external pressures such as trade policy adjustments and heightened sustainability expectations are prompting companies to rethink sourcing footprints and accelerate circular material initiatives.
For decision makers, the implication is clear: technical excellence must be matched by strategic supply chain design and transparent sustainability planning. Those who integrate material science, design optimization, and procurement agility will be better positioned to respond to shocks and to capitalize on opportunities created by shifting end use requirements. Moving forward, the balance between localized production resilience and the economics of scale will determine how firms configure capacity and prioritize investments. Ultimately, organizations that adopt a disciplined, cross-functional approach to material qualification and strategic sourcing will gain a durable competitive advantage in the polyamide six injection molding landscape.