查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1853687

依系统类型、最终用途、处理器类型和架构分類的天基运算平台市场－2025-2032年全球预测

Space On-board Computing Platform Market by System Type, End Use, Processor Type, Architecture - Global Forecast 2025-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 188 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2032 年，太空运算平台市场规模将达到 70.8 亿美元，复合年增长率为 20.01%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年2024年 16.4亿美元
预计年份：2025年 19.7亿美元
预测年份 2032 70.8亿美元
复合年增长率（%） 20.01%

模组化、弹性以及边缘处理重新定义了系统工程和采购的预期，为现代车载运算奠定了基础。

随着专案对更高效能、更强韧性和更具适应性的架构提出更高要求，以应对长期任务，机载运算平台领域正迅速走向成熟。本文将探讨影响当前策略规划的核心主题：计算子系统与有效载荷子系统之间更紧密的整合、对抗辐射加固设计的日益重视，以及在数据生成地点附近进行数据处理的需求不断增长。这些因素共同作用，正在重新定义民用、商业和国防航太专案的采购标准、系统工程优先顺序和供应商选择框架。

此外，业界正逐渐达成共识：软体定义能力、模组化硬体堆迭和标准化介面能够降低整合风险并加速任务进度。随着专案转向多任务卫星群和在轨服务模式转变，星载电脑必须在原始吞吐量、确定性运作、能源效率和优雅降级模式之间取得平衡。从这个角度来看，专案经理和设计人员必须将运算平台视为策略推动因素，而不仅仅是组件，它们将塑造下游运行概念、与地面系统的互动以及全生命週期保障计划。

因此，相关人员必须重新评估关于集中式处理、温度控管和资料下行链路依赖性的传统假设。过渡计画应纳入技术准备评估、供应链视觉性和跨域检验策略，以使预期效能与任务保障要求保持一致。本引言为深入分析近期变化、政策影响、分段讯号的解读以及共同影响采购和整合选择的区域特定动态奠定了基础。

异质处理器、模组化架构和增强的弹性方面的进步如何重塑在轨系统的设计范式和运行预期？

处理器效能、软体架构和任务概念的进步正在改变星载运算格局，进而影响技术蓝图和商业性合作。高吞吐量有效载荷和分散式卫星群正日益推动着从单体大型主机向异构处理架构的转变，这种架构融合了抗辐射商用现成组件（COTS）、加固子系统和专用加速器。这种转变能够提昇在轨自主性和即时资料处理能力，从而减少对稀缺下行链路容量的依赖，并加速可操作情报的交付。

同时，强调模组化和标准介面的设计理念使得主整合商和二级供应商能够解耦开发进度，并引入迭代升级，而无需对平台进行彻底的重新设计。因此，生命週期管理更加重视可重构性、软体修补程式策略以及检验架构，这些架构能够检验增量变更，同时最大限度地降低任务风险。这种转变也有利于利用边缘处理来在局部决策迴路的分散式架构模式，从而改善延迟并提高系统弹性。

最后，供应链韧性和网路安全已提升至与供应链韧性同等重要的绩效指标地位。日益加剧的地缘政治不确定性和威胁因素要求设计团队从一开始就将溯源追踪、安全发射机制和故障侦测分析纳入考量。总而言之，这些变革趋势需要现代化的采购框架、更完善的系统工程管治以及硬体、软体和任务运作团队之间的跨学科协作。

应对新的贸易政策现实和重组供应链的压力，将提高采购韧性和零件溯源性性作为关键的计画优先事项。

近期影响技术进口和零件流通的关税政策变化，为依赖全球供应链建构计算子系统的规划人员带来了新的考量。适用于特定电子元件、处理器和子系统组件的关税调整，凸显了供应链映射和供应商多元化的重要性。因此，专案团队现在需要在采购生命週期的早期阶段检验替代筹资策略，以降低交货前置作业时间的不确定性以及跨境物流和海关手续带来的成本增加。

为此，许多系统整合商正透过加快对替代供应商的资格认证和优化材料清单清单合理化来降低单一来源风险。采购团队正在将关税敏感性分析纳入合约谈判，工程团队则在设计支援替代的接口，以便在无需大量重新验证的情况下进行临时零件替换。作为一项过渡措施，具有自主权要求的组织也在探索本地组装和最终测试方案，以避免触发某些关税并缩短物流链。

此外，关税主导的供应商重新评估与同期技术变革的双重影响，更加凸显了文件、可追溯性和合规性工作流程的重要性。因此，设计机构应计划扩大配置管理工作，并加强供应商审核，以确保替代产品保持抗辐射能力、热性能和电磁相容性。简而言之，关税变化已将供应链策略从后勤部门提升为核心专案风险因素，需要在采购、工程和专案管治等各个环节进行综合应对。

解读系统级和基于用例的细分，以使处理器选择和架构模式与任务保障和运行要求保持一致。

分段式划分揭示了技术选择和专案优先顺序之间的交集，进而影响架构选择和供应商参与。通讯子系统着重于卫星间链路、遥控和遥测能力，而导航子系统则优先考虑全球导航卫星系统 (GNSS) 解决方案、惯性测量单元和星敏感器，以满足精确的姿态和定位需求。这些功能领域决定了认证机制和软体划分策略，并决定了在关键任务运行​​期间如何分配和优先排序计算资源。

从最终用途的角度来看，火箭、卫星、太空站和无人探勘各自对环境、延迟和维护提出了独特的要求。火箭需要高抗衝击性和短开发週期，卫星需要长期的热稳定性和抗辐射能力，太空站优先考虑模组化可维护性和载人运行的运作，而无人探勘需要强大的自主性和节能处理能力。这些不同的应用场景决定了处理器和系统结构的选择。

在处理器类型方面，现成处理器和抗辐射处理器之间的权衡取决于效能、软体生态系统和可靠性等级。现成处理器可以实现高运算密度和成本效益，但需要纠错码和冗余等缓解策略。另一方面，抗辐射组件虽然单位成本较高，但通常原始吞吐量较低，却能提供确定性效能。而强调云端整合和边缘处理的分散式架构则提供了更高的容错性和扩充性，但需要先进的同步和分区方案。总而言之，将分区选择与任务概况和生命週期约束相匹配，可以优化系统设计并明确采购路径。

区域产业布局、法规环境和伙伴关係模式如何影响全球市场的采购决策和整合路径

区域动态影响供应链的可用性、监管压力和伙伴关係机会，进而影响平台设计和整合策略。在美洲，强劲的商业活动和大量的国防投资推动了对先进机载运算的需求，成熟的供应商体系为快速原型製作和迭代开发提供了支援。该地区还强调供应商的透明度和风险共担的合作协议，从而加速了模组化架构和基于商用现货（COTS）的高速开发策略的采用。

欧洲、中东和非洲：在欧洲、中东和非洲，政府主导的专案需求与商业主导的卫星群结合，使得监管合规和跨国产业伙伴关係成为两大重点。这些市场参与企业的采购通常需要在产业参与要求和绩效目标之间取得平衡，从而导致关键子系统的选择性国产化，并更加依赖联盟模式来完成复杂的整合任务。在这种环境下，可验证的过往业绩、认证准备情况以及在轨安全合规性成为采购简报的优先考虑因素。

亚太地区私营和政府部门都在快速提升能力，并专注于可扩展的製造和整合吞吐量。儘管该地区的供应链具备具有竞争力的组装和测试能力，但整合商在采购高效能处理器时必须密切注意组件可追溯性和出口管制问题。在所有地区，互通性标准、网路安全预期和生命週期保障模式正逐渐成为影响合作伙伴选择和长期专案论证的跨领域考量。

在专案选择过程中，供应商差异化评估（包括辐射设计经验、模组化产品策略和整合检验）是关键因素。

机载运算领域的主要企业由专业子系统供应商、垂直整合的主承包商和创新软体公司组成。这些公司凭藉其在抗辐射加固设计方面的深厚积累、支持自主运行的软体框架以及降低整合风险的成熟测试制度而脱颖而出。一些供应商也专注于提供垂直整合的解决方案，将硬体、中介软体和检验服务捆绑在一起，从而简化系统整合商的供应商管理，并减少整合过程中的介面交接次数。

其他公司则采用模组化、开放标准的方法来竞争，这些方法能够加快升级週期并促进第三方创新。保守型专案通常倾向于选择拥有丰富飞行经验和正式认证的供应商，而快速发展的商业专案则优先考虑能够展现快速迭代、强大的软体工具链和云端支援模式的供应商。此外，处理器供应商和子系统整合商之间的伙伴关係也日益普遍，共同设计的模组能够加快认证速度并减少介面不匹配的情况。

因此，采购团队在评估供应商时，不仅要检视其技术效能，还要检视其供应链透明度、软体生命週期支援以及严格的检验和整合测试实务。最具竞争力的供应商将是那些能够提供端到端可追溯性、清晰的升级路径以及与客户任务概况和维护预期相符的协作蓝图的供应商。

将模组化设计、供应链弹性和软体保障整合到专案采购中以加快任务准备的实用执行路径

为了将策略意图转化为可执行的计划，产业领导者应优先考虑以下四个核心行动，以应对技术、商业性和计划风险：首先，将模组化和介面标准化纳入早期需求，以便在不进行灾难性翻新的情况下实现供应商替换和迭代维修，从而降低长期维修成本并加速采用新的製程技术。

第二，实施全面的供应链风险管理，结合双源筹资策略、本地最终组装方案以及以零件来源和合规性为重点的高阶供应商审核。整合商还应将关税敏感性和物流应急计划纳入采购里程碑，以避免后期中断。第三，透过采用安全的开发生命週期、加密启动炼和边缘异常侦测框架，加强软体保障和网路安全。这将有助于维护任务完整性，同时实现先进的在轨自主性。

最后，透过协商达成支援分阶段交付、韧体更新路径和联合检验活动的协议，使商业模式与产品生命週期实际情况相符。此类合约安排能实现风险共用，促进创新，同时确保专案课责交付。

结合技术资料、专家访谈和场景分析的严谨多源调查方法，检验了系统级设计见解和筹资策略。

本研究综合了开放原始码技术文献、专利申请、标准文件、供应商产品简介和权威政策声明，并辅以对系统工程师、采购负责人和供应链专业人员的结构化访谈。主要数据与技术测试报告和已发布的项目披露资讯进行交叉核对，以确保一致性并突出声明功能与实际性能之间的差距。在条件允许的情况下，数据还通过检验的认证记录和供应商提供的整合案例研究检验，以评估其在实际应用中的适用性。

我们的分析方法强调各细分市场之间的相关性，并共同评估系统类型、处理器选择和架构选择，以得出可操作的见解。我们运用情境分析技术，探索在各种物流和关税压力下不同的供应商路径，并使用设计权衡框架来量化集中式架构与分散式架构在营运上的影响。本研究始终秉持保守的推断方法。结论是基于已记录的证据和专家支持，而非推测性的外推。

最后，该调查方法还包括与独立专家进行严格的审查，以发现盲点并对辐射缓解、软体分区和生命週期维护等方面的假设进行压力测试。这种多层次的方法确保了建议是基于技术实际情况，并适用于各种专案类型和采购环境。

综合各项结论，强调计算平台作为策略资产，并制定综合技术和采购规范以实现任务目标。

综上所述，上述分析为专案设计者和采购机构提供了清晰的策略启示。机载计算已从以组件为中心的考量演变为影响作战概念、保障模式和国际伙伴关係动态的关键任务定义领域。因此，相关人员必须将运算平台视为策略资产，需要係统工程、网路安全和供应链管理等跨职能团队的早期参与。

实现高吞吐量和低延迟绝不能以牺牲可靠的效能、可追溯性和可维护性为代价。此外，投资于模组化介面和稳健检验路径的组织能够快速采用技术进步，并降低长期整合风险。因此，架构选择、供应商合作和生命週期合约的合理组合将决定哪些专案能够在满足不断变化的任务需求的同时，保持可接受的风险和成本控制。

总而言之，将前瞻性的技术选择与严格的供应炼和合约框架相结合的严谨方法，将使该专案能够最好地利用现代机载计算的优势，同时应对长期任务和国际分散式开发生态系统带来的复杂性。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概览

第五章 市场洞察

  • 用于深空探勘的人工智慧驱动的自主星载导航和任务规划能力
  • 采用抗辐射加强的多核心处理器，并具备动态工作负载管理功能，以应用于卫星任务
  • 实现具有在轨重配置和更新功能的软体定义卫星架构
  • 整合高吞吐量光星间通讯链路以实现即时资料中继
  • 开发结合CPU、GPU和FPGA的低功耗异构运算平台，用于边缘处理
  • 客製化辐射缓解策略加速商用现成组件的采用
  • 加强机载网路安全框架，以抵御太空网路中新出现的威胁和入侵
  • 神经型态和量子启发式处理器在先进空间资料分析和人工智慧任务的应用
  • 利用模组化、即插即用的硬体和软体框架加速卫星有效载荷部署

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 依系统类型分類的星载计算平台市场

  • 通讯系统
    • 卫星间链路
    • 遥控
    • 遥测
  • 飞行控制系统
  • 导航系统
    • GNSS
    • 惯性测量单元
    • 星体追踪器
  • 机载资料处理
  • 电源管理系统

9. 以最终用途分類的星载计算平台市场

  • 发射火箭
  • 卫星
  • 太空站
  • 无人探测车

10. 依处理器类型分類的星载运算平台市场

  • 市售现成处理器
  • 耐辐射处理器

11. 依架构分類的星载运算平台市场

  • 集中式架构
    • 基于大型主机
    • 单一单元
  • 分散式架构
    • 云端整合
    • 边缘处理

12. 按地区分類的天基计算平台市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 依组别分類的天基计算平台市场

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各国天基计算平台市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章 竞争格局

  • 2024年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2024
  • 竞争分析
    • Honeywell International Inc.
    • Thales SA
    • Airbus SE
    • Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • The Boeing Company
    • Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • BAE Systems plc
    • RUAG Space AG
    • Moog Inc.
    • Cobham plc
Product Code: MRR-8C74ADFC0D4B

The Space On-board Computing Platform Market is projected to grow by USD 7.08 billion at a CAGR of 20.01% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024] USD 1.64 billion
Estimated Year [2025] USD 1.97 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 7.08 billion
CAGR (%) 20.01%

Framing the modern on-board computing imperative where modularity, resilience, and edge processing redefine systems engineering and procurement expectations

The on-board computing platform space is undergoing rapid maturation as programs demand higher performance, greater resilience, and more adaptable architectures for extended missions. This introduction frames the central themes that shape current strategic planning: tighter integration between compute and payload subsystems, intensified attention to radiation-tolerant design, and the rising imperative to process data closer to where it is generated. These drivers combine to redefine procurement criteria, systems engineering priorities, and supplier selection frameworks across civil, commercial, and defense space initiatives.

Moreover, the industry is converging on a consensus that software-defined functionality, modular hardware stacks, and standardized interfaces will reduce integration risk and accelerate mission timelines. As programs pivot toward multi-mission constellations and on-orbit servicing concepts, on-board compute must balance raw throughput with deterministic behavior, power efficiency, and graceful degradation modes. In this context, program managers and architects should treat compute platforms not merely as components but as strategic enablers that shape downstream operational concepts, ground segment interactions, and lifecycle sustainment plans.

Consequently, stakeholders must reassess legacy assumptions about centralized processing, thermal management, and data downlink dependency. Transition planning should incorporate technology readiness assessments, supply chain visibility, and cross-domain verification strategies to align expected performance with mission assurance requirements. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper analysis of recent shifts, policy impacts, segmentation signal interpretation, and region-specific dynamics that together shape procurement and integration choices.

How advances in heterogeneous processors, modular architectures, and hardened resilience are reshaping design paradigms and operational expectations for in-orbit systems

The landscape for on-board computing is shifting in ways that alter technical roadmaps and commercial interactions, driven by advances in processor performance, software architectures, and mission concepts. Increasingly, high-throughput payloads and distributed constellations propel a move from monolithic mainframes toward heterogeneous processing fabrics that combine radiation-aware COTS, hardened subsystems, and specialized accelerators. This transition enables higher levels of autonomy and real-time data reduction on orbit, which in turn reduces reliance on scarce downlink capacity and accelerates actionable intelligence delivery.

Concurrently, a design philosophy that emphasizes modularity and standard interfaces allows prime integrators and secondary suppliers to decouple development timelines and introduce iterative upgrades without wholesale platform redesign. As a result, life-cycle management will emphasize reconfigurability, software patching strategies, and verification architectures that can validate incremental changes with minimal mission risk. This shift also favors distributed architectural patterns that leverage edge processing to localize decision loops, improving latency and fault tolerance.

Finally, supply chain resiliency and cybersecurity have ascended to near-equal priority with performance metrics. With geopolitical uncertainty and increased threat vectors, design teams must embed provenance tracking, secure boot mechanisms, and fault-detection analytics from the earliest stages. Taken together, these transformative trends necessitate updated acquisition frameworks, tighter systems engineering governance, and cross-disciplinary collaboration among hardware, software, and mission operations teams.

Navigating new trade policy realities and supply chain reconfiguration pressures that elevate procurement resilience and component provenance as program-critical priorities

Recent tariff policy changes affecting technology imports and component flows have introduced new considerations for planners who rely on global supply chains for compute subsystems. Tariff adjustments applied to certain electronic components, processors, and subsystem assemblies increase the importance of supply chain mapping and supplier diversification. Consequently, program teams must now validate alternate sourcing strategies earlier in the acquisition lifecycle to mitigate lead-time uncertainty and cost escalation associated with cross-border logistics and customs processing.

In response, many integrators are accelerating qualification of alternative suppliers and optimizing bill-of-materials rationalization to reduce exposure to single-source risks. This strategic pivot has operational implications: procurement teams are embedding tariff sensitivity analyses into contract negotiation, while engineering teams are designing substitution-ready interfaces that allow last-minute parts swaps without extensive requalification. As a transitional measure, organizations with sovereign requirements are also exploring localized assembly and final test options to circumvent certain tariff triggers and shorten logistics chains.

Moreover, the combined effect of tariff-driven supplier re-evaluation and concurrent technology shifts is amplifying the emphasis on documentation, traceability, and compliance workflows. Design authorities should therefore plan for expanded configuration management efforts and enhanced supplier audits to ensure that substitutions maintain radiation tolerance, thermal behavior, and electromagnetic compatibility. In short, tariff changes have elevated supply chain strategy from a back-office concern to a central program risk factor requiring integrated mitigation across sourcing, engineering, and program governance.

Interpreting system-level and use-case driven segmentation to align processor choices and architectural patterns with mission assurance and operational demands

Segment-level distinctions reveal where technology choices and program priorities intersect, influencing architecture selection and supplier engagement. Based on system type, communication systems, flight control systems, navigation systems, onboard data handling, and power management systems present distinct engineering demands; communication subsystems emphasize inter-satellite links, telecommand, and telemetry capabilities, while navigation subsystems prioritize GNSS solutions, inertial measurement units, and star trackers to meet precise attitude and positioning needs. These functional domains shape qualification regimes and software partitioning strategies, and they dictate how compute resources are allocated and prioritized during mission-critical operations.

From an end-use perspective, launch vehicles, satellites, space stations, and unmanned rovers each impose unique environmental, latency, and maintenance constraints. Launch vehicles require high shock tolerance and short development cycles, satellites demand long-term thermal stability and radiation resilience, space stations prioritize modular maintainability and uptime for crewed operations, and unmanned rovers require rugged autonomy and energy-aware processing. These use-case distinctions drive divergent choices in processor selection and systems architecture.

Regarding processor types, the tradeoff between commercial off-the-shelf processors and radiation-hardened processors centers on performance, software ecosystem, and assurance levels. COTS devices can deliver higher compute density and cost efficiency but necessitate mitigation strategies such as error-correcting codes and redundancy, while radiation-hardened parts provide deterministic behavior at higher per-unit cost and often reduced raw throughput. In architecture terms, centralized and distributed patterns present clear trade-offs; centralized configurations-either mainframe-based or single-unit approaches-simplify orchestration but can create single points of failure, whereas distributed architectures that are cloud-integrated or emphasize edge processing improve resilience and scalability but require sophisticated synchronization and partitioning schemes. Overall, aligning segmentation choices with mission profiles and lifecycle constraints yields optimized system designs and clearer procurement pathways.

How regional industrial footprints, regulatory environments, and partnership models influence procurement decisions and integration pathways across global markets

Regional dynamics influence supply chain availability, regulatory pressure, and partnership opportunities, which in turn affect platform design and integration strategies. In the Americas, strong commercial activity and significant defense investments drive demand for advanced on-board computing, supported by a mature supplier base that enables rapid prototyping and iterative development. This region also emphasizes vendor transparency and collaborative risk-sharing agreements, which facilitates accelerated adoption of modular architectures and COTS-based acceleration strategies.

Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibit a mix of sovereign program requirements and commercially driven constellations, prompting a dual focus on regulatory compliance and cross-border industrial partnerships. Procurement in these markets often balances industrial participation requirements with performance objectives, leading to selective indigenization of critical subsystems and increased reliance on consortium approaches for complex integration tasks. This environment prioritizes demonstrable provenance, certification readiness, and orbital safety compliance as part of the procurement narrative.

Asia-Pacific demonstrates rapid capacity building across both commercial and government sectors, with an emphasis on scalable manufacturing and integration throughput. Supply chains in this region offer competitive assembly and test capabilities, but integrators must remain vigilant about component traceability and export-control implications when sourcing high-performance processors. Across all regions, interoperability standards, cybersecurity expectations, and lifecycle sustainment models are emerging as cross-cutting concerns that shape partner selection and long-term program affordability.

Assessing vendor differentiation where heritage in radiation design, modular product strategies, and integrated verification prove decisive for program selection

Leading companies in the on-board computing domain reflect a blend of specialized subsystem suppliers, vertically integrated primes, and innovative software houses. These organizations differentiate through combinations of heritage in radiation-tolerant design, software frameworks for autonomy, and proven test regimes that reduce integration risk. Some suppliers emphasize vertically integrated offerings that bundle hardware, middleware, and verification services, which simplifies supplier management for system integrators and reduces the number of discrete interface handoffs during integration.

Other firms compete on modular, open-standards approaches that enable faster upgrade cycles and third-party innovation. This diversity in supplier strategies enables program offices to select partners aligned with their risk posture: conservative programs often favor suppliers with extended flight heritage and formal certification practices, while fast-moving commercial ventures prioritize vendors who can demonstrate rapid iteration, robust software toolchains, and cloud-enabled support models. Moreover, partnerships between processor vendors and subsystem integrators are increasingly common, with co-designed modules that accelerate time-to-qualification and reduce interface mismatches.

As a consequence, procurement teams should evaluate vendors not only on technical performance but also on supply chain transparency, software lifecycle support, and evidence of rigorous verification-integration-test practices. The most competitive suppliers will be those that offer end-to-end traceability, clear upgrade pathways, and collaborative roadmaps that align with customer mission profiles and sustainment expectations.

Practical execution pathways to integrate modular design, supply resilience, and software assurance into program procurements to accelerate mission readiness

To convert strategic intent into executable program plans, industry leaders should prioritize four core actions that address technical, commercial, and programmatic risk. First, embed modularity and interface standardization into early requirements to enable supplier substitution and iterative upgrades without catastrophic requalification. Doing so reduces long-term sustainment cost and accelerates the adoption of emergent processing technologies.

Second, implement comprehensive supply chain risk management that combines dual-sourcing strategies, localized final assembly options, and advanced supplier audits focused on component provenance and compliance. Integrators should also incorporate tariff sensitivity and logistics contingency planning into procurement milestones to avoid late-stage disruptions. Third, strengthen software assurance and cybersecurity by adopting secure development lifecycles, encrypted boot chains, and anomaly detection frameworks that operate at the edge. This will preserve mission integrity while enabling advanced on-orbit autonomy.

Finally, align commercial models with lifecycle realities by negotiating contracts that support phased deliveries, firmware update pathways, and joint verification activities. These contractual constructs will enable shared risk and foster innovation while maintaining programmatic accountability. Taken together, these actions equip organizations to navigate technical complexity, regulatory friction, and supplier volatility with greater confidence and clearer decision levers.

A rigorous multi-source methodology integrating technical artifacts, expert interviews, and scenario analysis to validate system-level design insights and procurement strategies

This research synthesizes open-source technical literature, patent filings, standards documentation, supplier product briefs, and authoritative policy statements, augmented by structured interviews with systems engineers, procurement leads, and supply chain specialists. Primary inputs underwent triangulation against technical test reports and public program disclosures to ensure consistency and to highlight divergence between stated capabilities and demonstrable performance. Where possible, data were validated against verified qualification records and vendor-provided integration case studies to assess real-world applicability.

Analytical methods emphasized cross-segmentation correlation, wherein system type, processor selection, and architecture choices were evaluated together to develop actionable insights. Scenario analysis techniques were applied to explore supplier substitution pathways under varying logistics and tariff stressors, while design-trade frameworks helped quantify the operational implications of centralized versus distributed architectures. Throughout the study, a conservative approach to inference was maintained: conclusions rest on documented evidence and expert corroboration rather than speculative extrapolation.

Finally, the methodology included a rigorous review cycle with independent subject-matter experts to surface blind spots and to stress-test assumptions about radiation mitigation, software partitioning, and lifecycle sustainment. This multi-layered approach ensures that recommendations are grounded in technical reality and are applicable across a range of program types and procurement environments.

Concluding synthesis that underscores compute platforms as strategic assets and prescribes integrated technical and procurement discipline to realize mission objectives

Synthesis of the preceding analysis leads to clear strategic implications for program architects and procurement authorities. On-board computing has evolved from a component-centric consideration to a mission-defining domain that influences operational concepts, sustainment models, and international partnership dynamics. Stakeholders must therefore treat compute platforms as strategic assets that warrant early involvement from cross-functional teams spanning systems engineering, cybersecurity, and supply chain management.

Looking ahead, success will hinge on the ability to reconcile performance ambitions with pragmatic assurance measures: achieving high throughput and low latency must not come at the expense of provenance, traceability, or maintainability. Additionally, organizations that invest in modular interfaces and robust verification pathways will unlock faster insertion of technological advances and reduce long-term integration risk. In this way, the right mix of architecture selection, supplier engagement, and lifecycle contracting will determine which programs can meet evolving mission profiles while maintaining acceptable risk and cost trajectories.

In conclusion, a disciplined approach that couples forward-looking technical choices with rigorous supply chain and contractual frameworks will best position programs to exploit the benefits of modern on-board computing while managing the attendant complexities of long-duration missions and internationally distributed development ecosystems.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.4. Currency & Pricing
  • 1.5. Language
  • 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. AI-driven autonomous onboard navigation and mission planning capabilities for deep space exploration
  • 5.2. Adoption of radiation-hardened multicore processors with dynamic workload management for satellite missions
  • 5.3. Implementation of software-defined satellite architectures with in-orbit reconfiguration and updates
  • 5.4. Integration of high-throughput optical inter-satellite communication links for real-time data relay
  • 5.5. Development of low-power heterogeneous computing platforms combining CPUs, GPUs and FPGAs for edge processing
  • 5.6. Adoption of commercial off-the-shelf components accelerated by custom radiation mitigation strategies
  • 5.7. Enhancement of onboard cybersecurity frameworks to protect against emerging space network threats and intrusions
  • 5.8. Emergence of neuromorphic and quantum-inspired processors for advanced spaceborne data analysis and AI tasks
  • 5.9. Use of modular plug-and-play hardware and software frameworks to accelerate satellite payload deployment

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by System Type

  • 8.1. Communication Systems
    • 8.1.1. Inter Satellite Links
    • 8.1.2. Telecommand
    • 8.1.3. Telemetry
  • 8.2. Flight Control Systems
  • 8.3. Navigation Systems
    • 8.3.1. G N S S
    • 8.3.2. Inertial Measurement Units
    • 8.3.3. Star Trackers
  • 8.4. Onboard Data Handling
  • 8.5. Power Management Systems

9. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by End Use

  • 9.1. Launch Vehicles
  • 9.2. Satellites
  • 9.3. Space Stations
  • 9.4. Unmanned Rovers

10. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Processor Type

  • 10.1. Commercial Off The Shelf Processors
  • 10.2. Radiation Hardened Processors

11. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Architecture

  • 11.1. Centralized Architecture
    • 11.1.1. Mainframe Based
    • 11.1.2. Single Unit
  • 11.2. Distributed Architecture
    • 11.2.1. Cloud Integrated
    • 11.2.2. Edge Processing

12. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Space On-board Computing Platform Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. Competitive Landscape

  • 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
  • 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
  • 15.3. Competitive Analysis
    • 15.3.1. Honeywell International Inc.
    • 15.3.2. Thales S.A.
    • 15.3.3. Airbus SE
    • 15.3.4. Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • 15.3.5. The Boeing Company
    • 15.3.6. Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • 15.3.7. BAE Systems plc
    • 15.3.8. RUAG Space AG
    • 15.3.9. Moog Inc.
    • 15.3.10. Cobham plc

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 15. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 16. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 17. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 18. ASIA-PACIFIC SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 19. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 20. ASEAN SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 21. GCC SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 22. EUROPEAN UNION SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 23. BRICS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 24. G7 SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 25. NATO SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 26. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 27. SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
  • FIGURE 28. SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
  • TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INTER SATELLITE LINKS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELECOMMAND, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY TELEMETRY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY G N S S, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INERTIAL MEASUREMENT UNITS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY STAR TRACKERS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ONBOARD DATA HANDLING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY LAUNCH VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SATELLITES, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SPACE STATIONS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY UNMANNED ROVERS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RADIATION HARDENED PROCESSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MAINFRAME BASED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE UNIT, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD INTEGRATED, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY EDGE PROCESSING, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. GLOBAL SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. AMERICAS SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. NORTH AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. LATIN AMERICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 229. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 230. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 231. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 232. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 233. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 234. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 235. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 236. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 237. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 238. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 239. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 240. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 241. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 242. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 243. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 244. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 245. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 246. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 247. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 248. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 249. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 250. EUROPE SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 251. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 252. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 253. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 254. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 255. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 256. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 257. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 258. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 259. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 260. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 261. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 262. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSOR TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 263. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 264. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 265. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 266. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CENTRALIZED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 267. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 268. MIDDLE EAST SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTED ARCHITECTURE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 269. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 270. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 271. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 272. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 273. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 274. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 275. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 276. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 277. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY END USE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 278. AFRICA SPACE ON-BOARD COMPUTING PLATFORM M