![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1856383
糖尿病视网膜病变市场:按产品类型、糖尿病类型、患者类型和最终用户划分 - 2025-2032 年全球预测Diabetic Retinopathy Market by Product Type, Diabetic Type, Patient Type, End-User - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,糖尿病视网膜病变市场规模将达到 148.7 亿美元,复合年增长率为 6.37%。
| 关键市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年 2024 | 90.7亿美元 |
| 预计年份:2025年 | 96.2亿美元 |
| 预测年份 2032 | 148.7亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率 (%) | 6.37% |
糖尿病视网膜病变仍然是糖尿病最严重的微血管併发症之一,对临床医生、医疗系统和患者都是持续的挑战。儘管近年来影像学和治疗方法都取得了快速进展,但随着人口结构变化、许多地区糖尿病患病率上升以及医疗服务模式的转变,该疾病的负担仍在不断变化。因此,为了帮助相关人员了解目前的现状,需要全面了解影响医疗服务可近性和治疗结果的临床路径、技术成熟度和系统性限制因素。
本导言透过描述从早期无症状性变化到威胁视力的增殖性疾病的临床连续过程、多模态成像在早期检测中日益重要的作用,以及治疗策略向药物玻璃体内注射治疗(辅以激光和手术干预)的转变,为后续分析奠定了基础。此外,本导言还概述了关键相关人员群体——医生、医疗保健系统、相关人员、医疗设备和药物研发人员以及患者权益倡导者——并重点阐述了影响决策的交叉因素,例如监管变化、报销压力和供应链脆弱性。透过将读者置于这一多方面环境中,本书旨在鼓励就如何透过干预、投资和政策参与来最有效地改善患者预后和增强系统韧性展开策略性讨论。
糖尿病视网膜病变的治疗格局正在经历多项变革,这些变革同时影响临床实践、商业策略和医疗政策。首先,治疗模式已显着转向眼内药物治疗,抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物成为治疗此威胁视力疾病的核心。这项转变推动了给药方案、持续给药系统和联合治疗方案的创新,力求在疗效和治疗负担之间取得平衡。同时,诊断技术的融合,特别是广角成像、光同调断层扫瞄和人工智慧的进步,正在加速早期检测和风险分层,从而实现更个人化的治疗方案。
同时,监管机构和支付方对价值和结果的审查日益严格,迫使製造商和医疗服务提供者提供可靠的真实世界证据,并在实际环境中证明其持续的临床效益。这些压力正在推动新的商业模式的出现,这些模式强调基于结果的合约、整合式医疗路径以及与专科诊所和门诊手术中心的合作,以提高医疗服务的可及性和成本效益。此外,供应链的复杂性和地缘政治动态等宏观因素也促使各机构重新评估其采购策略并投资于增强自身韧性。这些发展既为改善病患疗效提供了机会,也带来了挑战,需要各部门协调一致地应对,以维持创新和公平的医疗服务。
2025年美国关税调整的实施,对采购、临床运作以及糖尿病视网膜病变干预措施的普及等方面产生了一系列复杂的累积影响。其中一个直接影响途径是依赖进口投入(尤其是全球供应链)的专用雷射平台、影像处理设备和某些手术器械的成本结构。更高的关税可能会削弱医院和门诊手术中心先前享有的采购优势,迫使医疗机构重新考虑其设备购置计划,并优先选择本地服务能力更强、总体拥有成本(TCO)更低的设备。
在医药领域,对半成品和包装交付可能会逐步增加註射剂的运输成本,而对进口原料药的限制可能会促使供应商寻找替代来源或加快与国内生产商的合作。这些动态可能会提高付款人和医院采购团队对价格的敏感度,从而导致更严格的药品目录控制和更激烈的报销谈判。此外,关税也会与更广泛的供应链脆弱性相互作用。港口的物流延误和行政负担增加可能会加剧交付延迟,影响诊所的日程安排和患者的治疗方法依从性。
随着时间的推移,这些影响将塑造製造商和医疗服务提供者的策略选择。一些公司将采取回流或近岸外包策略,投资策略库存缓衝,或重新谈判供应商合同,以减轻关税的影响。另一些公司将专注于临床和经济证据,以在与支付方的谈判中证明高级产品的合理性;还有一些公司将加快开发低成本的替代疗法或持续给药技术,以减少患者就诊次数。无论哪种情况,营运、临床和采购方面的综合影响都将要求供应链、临床和商业领导者积极规划并密切合作,以在贸易相关成本压力日益增加的环境下,维持医疗服务的连续性并保障患者的就医机会。
细分市场层面的动态变化提供了所需的详细洞察,有助于在产品、疾病、患者和终端用户等多个维度上协调临床、商业和营运策略。从产品角度来看,药物介入和手术技术仍然至关重要:抗 VEGF 药物,例如阿柏西普、Bevacizumab和雷珠单抗,在药物治疗领域占据主导地位;而皮质类固醇,例如地塞米松和曲安奈德,对于特定适应症和难治性病例仍然非常重要。作为药物治疗的补充,雷射设备和外科植入在特定疾病阶段和复杂的手术治疗中继续发挥重要作用,这些产品类别之间的相互作用决定了医疗服务提供者的治疗顺序和采购优先顺序。
糖尿病视网膜病变非增殖期和增殖期的分期差异直接影响监测强度和治疗方法的选择,因为早期和致盲期疾病的干预阈值和预期视力预后轨迹有显着差异。成人和儿童患者群体的划分也增加了临床的复杂性。儿童病例需要不同的给药方案、监测週期,并需考虑长期视力发育,而成人治疗方案则必须应对老年患者群体中常见的合併症和依从性挑战。
终端用户细分进一步凸显了需求和可近性。门诊手术中心、诊所和医院的采购能力、人员配备模式和计费结构各不相同;在诊所内部,全科诊所和专科诊所之间的区别会影响转诊模式和手术量。无论是私立医院还是公立医院,都面临预算限制、资本采购週期和支付方组合等问题,这些问题都会影响技术采用的时间节点以及对耐用植入与重复用药的偏好。整合这些细分层面,可以针对产品定位、临床应用和商业性推广采取更细緻入微的方法,从而反映糖尿病视网膜病变治疗在不同环境下的实际发展。
区域环境对糖尿病视网膜病变诊疗的组织、报销和应用方式有着显着影响,因此,区域观点对于制定既能满足当地需求又能与全球目标相符的策略至关重要。在美洲,多样化的医疗保健体系和玻璃体内药物治疗的悠久传统,使得先进疗法的应用标准较高,但都市区之间的医疗资源获取并不均衡,支付方的谈判和医院的采购决策也对产品的采用产生显着影响。随着相关人员寻求减轻医疗负担和扩大推广,从三级医疗中心向社区诊所和门诊手术中心的转移已成为一个反覆出现的主题。
欧洲、中东和非洲的法律规范和报销途径千差万别,呈现出复杂的格局,导致各地医疗技术的普及程度也各不相同。虽然集中化的卫生技术评估流程和基于结果的合约在一些欧洲市场发挥着重要作用,但在中东和非洲部分地区,资源限制和基础设施差异限制了高成本医疗设备和常用注射疗法的可及性。因此,这些地区的相关人员通常优先投资于持久性疗法、任务转移模式和诊断能力,以优化有限的临床资源。
亚太地区市场多元化,涵盖了从高度发展、技术先进的系统到快速发展的公共卫生计画。公共卫生部门针对高风险族群的筛检措施、私部门在诊断和服务提供方面的创新,以及对本地製造和供应链韧性的日益重视,都在推动新技术的应用。在整个全部区域,新技术的应用速度和规模将取决于医保报销政策、都市化趋势以及训练有素的眼科医生的数量,而这些因素的相互作用将决定新型疗法和诊断工具能够以多快的速度和多大的规模应用于临床。
在糖尿病视网膜病变领域,企业层面的竞争呈现出三重态势:一方面是基于疗效的竞争,另一方面是基于给药机制的差异化,以及旨在扩大治疗可及性的合作。领先的药物研发企业持续投资于抗VEGF临床计画、改善给药频率以及研发持续给药平台,旨在减轻病患和诊所的治疗负担。同时,外科器械製造商也正在努力提高玻璃体视网膜手术的精准度和术后恢復效果。
例如,将药物组合与诊断和递送技术结合,打造涵盖药物发现和持续治疗的端到端解决方案。智慧财产权定位仍然是新型递送系统和生物製药的关键差异化因素,能够提供强有力的临床和真实世界证据,证明其疗效持久性和安全性得到提升的公司,将在与支付方的谈判中占据比较优势。
在营运层面,各公司正努力平衡对临床证据产生的投入与提升供应链韧性以及在策略要地实现在地化生产之间的关係。商业团队正探索差异化路径,以符合医院、专科诊所和门诊手术中心采购週期和临床吞吐量的价值提案来吸引它们。最终,组织敏捷性、伙伴关係能力以及将临床获益与可衡量的服务水准提升联繫起来的能力,将决定哪些公司能够最有效地改善病患疗效和商业性绩效。
产业领导者应制定一套切实可行的策略,将临床价值与营运可行性结合,以加快患者就医速度并增强市场韧性。首先,应实现供应链多元化,优先发展能够提供透明度、灵活性和短期紧急应变能力的供应商关係,以减轻关税和物流中断的影响。投资策略性库存并探索在地化生产和包装的伙伴关係,可以降低跨国贸易波动带来的风险,同时保障医疗服务的连续性。
第二,要着重产生能够引起支付方和医疗服务提供方共鸣的证据,强调真实世界的结果、病患报告指标以及能够证明减轻医疗负担和降低后续成本的卫生经济学分析。将临床试验数据与专科诊所和门诊手术中心的真实世界证据相结合,可以增强在基于价值的医疗安排和报销谈判中的议价能力。第三,要采取针对最终用户的差异化市场推广策略。医院需要强有力的预算和结果说明,专科诊所寻求工作流程效率和培训支持,而门诊手术中心则优先考虑总医疗成本和吞吐量。
最后,投资于数位化分流和远距眼科项目,以扩大服务不足地区的筛检,并建立患者支持机制,从而提高患者的依从性和后续追踪率。与支付方、医疗系统和倡导团体进行策略合作,可以加速推广永续技术和新型服务模式。透过整合这些战术性重点,领导者可以将风险转化为竞争优势,并在医疗服务可近性和疗效方面取得可衡量的进展。
本报告的分析是基于混合方法研究途径,透过三角验证多方面的证据来源,确保其稳健性和有效性。主要资讯来源包括对执业视网膜专科医生、医院采购负责人、诊所管理人员和支付方代表进行的结构化访谈,以了解临床医生的实际行为、采购限制和报销决策标准。次要研究则涵盖同侪审查的临床文献、监管文件、专业学会指南和製造商产品资料,以梳理治疗模式、设备特性和近期临床试验结果。
资料综合采用主题编码法,从质性访谈中辨识出反覆出现的模式,并将这些见解与设备采纳和采购路径中观察到的量化讯号进行比对。同侪检验由临床医生和医疗系统领导者组成的咨询小组进行,以检验假设、完善情境分析,并确保实际应用基于营运实际情况。对关键论点进行敏感度检验,以确定共识领域,并指出尚未出现证据的不确定性。
我们坦诚承认调查方法的局限性:快速发展的临床证据和地区性监管变化可能会影响技术采纳的时间,而获取专有采购数据也可能限制我们对商业性动态的细緻程度。儘管如此,临床医生的意见、证据综合以及专家检验相结合,为本研究提出的战略意义和旨在改善患者照护和系统韧性的建议措施提供了合理的依据。
为了将科学进步转化为持续的患者获益,临床创新、商业性策略和政策干预必须协调一致。治疗和诊断创新为早期发现疾病和减轻治疗负担提供了清晰的路径,但只有当供应链具有韧性、报销框架采用基于结果的模式,以及医疗服务提供者能够在医院、诊所和门诊手术中心等各个环节采用新的治疗路径时,这一价值链才能得以实现。 2025 年的关税政策揭露了采购和成本结构中的脆弱性,使这些优先事项更加紧迫。
这些措施包括加强以证据为基础的方法,以满足支付方和医疗服务提供者的需求;投资于能够降低贸易波动风险的供应链策略;以及开发有针对性的服务提供模式,在扩大服务覆盖范围的同时,维持临床品质。此外,製造商、医疗服务提供者、支付方和政策制定者之间的跨部门合作对于平衡控製成本和扩大高价值治疗方法的可及性至关重要。透过采取务实的、以证据为基础的方法,并奖励,相关人员可以将当前的挑战转化为糖尿病视网膜病变患者疗效的持久改善。
The Diabetic Retinopathy Market is projected to grow by USD 14.87 billion at a CAGR of 6.37% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 9.07 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 9.62 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 14.87 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 6.37% |
Diabetic retinopathy remains one of the most consequential microvascular complications of diabetes, presenting a persistent challenge for clinicians, health systems, and patients. Recent years have seen rapid advances in both diagnostic imaging and therapeutic modalities, yet the burden of disease continues to evolve alongside demographic shifts, rising diabetes prevalence in many regions, and changing patterns of care delivery. Therefore, orienting stakeholders to the contemporary landscape requires a synthesis that spans clinical pathways, technological maturation, and systemic constraints that affect access and outcomes.
This introduction establishes the foundational context for subsequent analysis by describing the clinical continuum from early, asymptomatic changes to sight-threatening proliferative disease, the expanding role of multimodal imaging in earlier detection, and the therapeutic transition toward pharmacologic intravitreal therapies complemented by laser and surgical interventions. Moreover, it outlines the principal stakeholder groups-clinicians, health systems, payers, device and pharmaceutical developers, and patient advocates-and highlights the cross-cutting forces such as regulatory shifts, reimbursement pressures, and supply chain fragilities that influence decision making. By situating the reader within this multifaceted environment, the section primes strategic discussion on where intervention, investment, and policy engagement will most effectively improve patient outcomes and system resilience.
The landscape for diabetic retinopathy care is undergoing several transformative shifts that are altering clinical practice, commercial strategy, and health policy simultaneously. First, the therapeutic paradigm has moved decisively toward intravitreal pharmacotherapies, with anti-VEGF agents becoming central to managing vision-threatening disease. This evolution has spurred innovations in dosing regimens, sustained-delivery systems, and combination approaches that seek to balance efficacy with treatment burden. Meanwhile, diagnostic technology convergence-particularly advances in widefield imaging, optical coherence tomography angiography, and artificial intelligence-has accelerated earlier detection and risk stratification, enabling more individualized treatment pathways.
Concurrently, regulatory agencies and payers are applying increased scrutiny to value and outcomes, which drives manufacturers and providers to generate robust real-world evidence and to demonstrate durable clinical benefit in pragmatic settings. These pressures are catalyzing new commercial models that emphasize outcomes-based contracting, integrated care pathways, and partnerships with specialty clinics and ambulatory surgical centers to improve access and cost efficiency. Finally, macro factors such as supply chain complexity and geopolitical dynamics are prompting organizations to reevaluate sourcing strategies and to invest in resilience. Together, these developments create both opportunities to improve patient outcomes and challenges that require coordinated, cross-sector responses to sustain innovation and equitable care delivery.
The implementation of United States tariff adjustments in 2025 has introduced a complex set of cumulative impacts across procurement, clinical operations, and broader access to diabetic retinopathy interventions. One immediate channel of impact is the cost structure for imported inputs, particularly specialized laser platforms, imaging devices, and certain surgical instruments that rely on global supply chains. Increased duties can erode procurement advantages that hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers previously realized, compelling providers to reassess capital acquisition timelines and to prioritize devices with local servicing capabilities or more favorable total cost of ownership.
In the pharmaceutical arena, tariffs on intermediate goods and packaging can incrementally raise the delivered cost of injectable therapies, while any constraints on imported active pharmaceutical ingredients may trigger suppliers to seek alternate sources or to accelerate domestic manufacturing partnerships. These dynamics can heighten price sensitivity among payers and hospital procurement teams, prompting more stringent formulary management and intensified negotiations over reimbursement. Moreover, tariffs interact with broader supply chain fragilities: logistics slowdowns and increased administrative burdens at ports can exacerbate delivery delays, influencing clinic scheduling and patient adherence to treatment regimens.
Over time, these effects coalesce to shape strategic choices by manufacturers and providers. Some organizations will pursue reshoring and nearshoring strategies, invest in strategic inventory buffers, or renegotiate supplier contracts to mitigate tariff exposure. Others will focus on clinical and economic evidence to justify premium products in payer discussions, or will accelerate development of lower-cost therapeutic alternatives and sustained-delivery technologies that reduce visit frequency. In all cases, the combined operational, clinical, and procurement consequences necessitate proactive scenario planning and closer collaboration among supply chain, clinical, and commercial leaders to preserve continuity of care and to protect patient access in an environment of heightened trade-related cost pressures.
Segment-level dynamics provide the granular insight necessary to tailor clinical, commercial, and operational strategies across product, disease, patient, and end-user dimensions. From a product perspective, the landscape centers on pharmacologic interventions and procedural technologies: Anti-VEGF agents such as aflibercept, bevacizumab, and ranibizumab occupy the core of medical therapy, while corticosteroids including dexamethasone and triamcinolone remain important for specific indications and refractory cases. Complementing pharmacotherapy, laser equipment and surgical implants continue to play essential roles for particular stages of disease and in complex surgical management, and the interaction between these product classes determines therapeutic sequencing and procurement priorities for providers.
Disease-stage segmentation-distinguishing non-proliferative from proliferative diabetic retinopathy-directly shapes intensity of monitoring and therapeutic selection, as the threshold for intervention and the expected trajectory of vision outcomes differ substantially between early-stage and sight-threatening disease. Patient-type segmentation between adult and pediatric populations introduces additional clinical complexities: pediatric cases require distinct dosing, monitoring cadence, and long-term visual development considerations, while adult care pathways must accommodate comorbidities and adherence challenges more commonly seen in older cohorts.
End-user segmentation further frames demand and access. Ambulatory surgical centers, clinics, and hospitals each present different procurement capabilities, staffing models, and billing structures, and within clinics the distinction between general clinics and specialty clinics influences referral patterns and procedural volume. Hospitals, whether private or public, face divergent budgetary constraints, capital procurement cycles, and payer mixes that influence their technology adoption timelines and preference for durable implants versus repeated pharmacotherapy. Integrating these segmentation layers enables a nuanced approach to product positioning, clinical engagement, and commercial deployment that reflects the realities of how diabetic retinopathy care is actually delivered across settings.
Regional context matters greatly for how diabetic retinopathy care is organized, reimbursed, and adopted, and a differentiated regional perspective is essential for shaping strategies that are locally effective yet globally coherent. In the Americas, diverse health systems and a strong legacy of intravitreal pharmacotherapy create a high baseline of adoption for advanced therapeutics, but access remains uneven across urban and rural geographies, with payer negotiations and hospital purchasing decisions exerting significant influence on product penetration. Transitioning from tertiary centers to community clinics and ambulatory surgical centers is a recurring theme as stakeholders seek to reduce treatment burden and expand outreach.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex tapestry where regulatory frameworks and reimbursement pathways vary widely, shaping heterogeneous uptake. In several European markets, centralized health technology assessment processes and outcomes-based contracting play a major role, while in parts of the Middle East and Africa resource constraints and infrastructure gaps limit access to high-cost devices and frequent injectable therapies. As a result, stakeholders in these regions often prioritize durable therapies, task-shifting models, and investments in diagnostic capacity to optimize limited clinical resources.
Asia-Pacific encompasses markets that range from highly developed, technology-forward systems to rapidly evolving public health programs. Adoption is driven by a combination of public health initiatives to screen at-risk populations, private-sector innovation in diagnostics and service delivery, and an increasing focus on local manufacturing and supply chain resilience. Across this region, the pace and scale of implementation hinge on reimbursement policy, urbanization trends, and the availability of trained ophthalmic specialists, with the interplay of these factors determining how quickly novel therapeutics and diagnostic tools translate into widespread clinical use.
Company-level activity in diabetic retinopathy is characterized by a mix of competition on therapeutic efficacy, differentiation through delivery mechanisms, and collaboration to expand access. Leading pharmaceutical developers continue to invest in anti-VEGF clinical programs, improvements in dosing frequency, and sustained-delivery platforms that aim to reduce the treatment burden for patients and clinics. Parallel efforts from device manufacturers focus on imaging solutions and laser platforms that integrate with clinical workflows and facilitate earlier detection and monitoring, while surgical device suppliers work to enhance precision and recovery in vitreoretinal procedures.
Strategic alliances and licensing arrangements are increasingly common as firms seek to combine strengths-for example, pairing pharmacologic portfolios with diagnostic or delivery technologies to create end-to-end solutions that address both detection and sustained therapy. Intellectual property positioning remains an important differentiator for novel delivery systems and biologic formulations, and companies that can demonstrate robust clinical and real-world evidence for improved durability or safety have comparative leverage in payer discussions.
Operationally, companies are balancing investments in clinical evidence generation with initiatives to improve supply chain resilience and to localize manufacturing where strategic. Commercial teams are pursuing differentiated pathways to engage hospitals, specialty clinics, and ambulatory surgical centers, tailoring value propositions to procurement cycles and clinical throughput. Ultimately, organizational agility, partnership acumen, and the ability to translate clinical benefits into measurable service-level improvements will determine which companies most effectively advance both patient outcomes and commercial performance.
Industry leaders should pursue a set of pragmatic, actionable strategies that align clinical value with operational feasibility to accelerate patient access and strengthen market resilience. First, diversify supply chains and prioritize supplier relationships that deliver transparency, flexibility, and near-term contingency capacity to mitigate tariff-driven and logistical disruptions. Investing in strategic inventories and exploring partnerships for localized manufacturing or packaging can reduce vulnerability to cross-border trade shifts while supporting continuity of care.
Second, focus on evidence generation that resonates with payers and providers by emphasizing real-world outcomes, patient-reported measures, and health economic analyses that demonstrate reductions in treatment burden or downstream costs. Coupling clinical trial data with pragmatic evidence from specialty clinics and ambulatory surgical centers strengthens negotiating positions in value-based arrangements and reimbursement discussions. Third, adopt differentiated go-to-market strategies that tailor engagement to end-users: hospitals require robust budgetary and outcomes narratives, specialty clinics look for workflow efficiencies and training support, and ambulatory surgical centers prioritize total cost of care and throughput.
Finally, invest in digital triage and teleophthalmology programs to expand screening in underserved areas, and develop patient support mechanisms that improve adherence and follow-up. Strategic collaborations with payers, health systems, and advocacy groups can accelerate uptake of durable technologies and new delivery models, while careful attention to pediatric-specific pathways will safeguard long-term vision outcomes for younger patients. By integrating these tactical priorities, leaders can transform risk into competitive advantage and drive measurable improvements in access and outcomes.
The analysis underpinning this report is grounded in a mixed-methods research approach that triangulates multiple evidence streams to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary sources included structured interviews with practicing retina specialists, hospital procurement officers, clinic administrators, and payer representatives to capture real-world clinician behavior, procurement constraints, and reimbursement decision criteria. Secondary research encompassed peer-reviewed clinical literature, regulatory filings, professional society guidelines, and manufacturer product literature to map therapy paradigms, device capabilities, and recent clinical trial outcomes.
Data synthesis employed thematic coding to identify recurring patterns across qualitative interviews and to align these insights with quantitative signals observed in device adoption and procurement pathways. Expert validation rounds were conducted with an advisory panel of clinicians and health system leaders to test assumptions, refine scenario analyses, and ensure that practical implications were grounded in operational realities. Sensitivity checks were applied to key assertions to identify areas of consensus and to highlight residual uncertainty where evidence remains emergent.
Limitations of the methodology are acknowledged candidly: rapidly evolving clinical evidence and region-specific regulatory shifts may alter adoption timelines, and access to proprietary procurement data can constrain the granularity of commercial dynamics. Nevertheless, the combination of clinician input, evidence synthesis, and expert validation provides a defensible basis for the strategic implications presented in this study and for the recommended actions designed to improve patient care and system resilience.
The collective findings underscore a critical inflection point in diabetic retinopathy care where clinical innovation, commercial strategy, and policy interventions must be aligned to translate scientific advances into sustained patient benefit. Therapeutic and diagnostic innovations offer clear pathways to earlier detection and reduced treatment burden, but their value will be realized only if supply chains are resilient, reimbursement frameworks are receptive to outcomes-based models, and providers are equipped to adopt new care pathways across hospitals, clinics, and ambulatory surgical centers. The 2025 tariff landscape adds urgency to these priorities by exposing vulnerabilities in procurement and cost structures that can impede access if unaddressed.
Consequently, stakeholders should prioritize coordinated action across several domains: strengthen evidence generation that meets payer and provider needs, invest in supply chain strategies that reduce exposure to trade volatility, and deploy targeted service delivery models that expand access while preserving clinical quality. Moreover, cross-sector collaboration-between manufacturers, providers, payers, and policymakers-will be essential to reconcile cost containment with the imperative to broaden access to high-value therapies. By adopting a pragmatic, evidence-led approach and by aligning incentives across the ecosystem, stakeholders can convert current challenges into lasting improvements in outcomes for people living with diabetic retinopathy.