![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1863039
工业多重通讯协定网关市场(依通讯协定支援、最终用途、产业领域、连接类型、部署模式和最终用户划分)-2025-2032年全球预测Industrial Multiprotocol Gateways Market by Protocol Support, End Use Application, Industry Vertical, Connectivity Type, Deployment Type, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032 |
||||||
※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。
预计到 2032 年,工业多重通讯协定网关市场将成长至 73.8 亿美元,复合年增长率为 12.70%。
| 关键市场统计数据 | |
|---|---|
| 基准年 2024 | 28.3亿美元 |
| 预计年份:2025年 | 32亿美元 |
| 预测年份 2032 | 73.8亿美元 |
| 复合年增长率 (%) | 12.70% |
工业多重通讯协定闸道在现代自动化架构中扮演着策略性角色,它们负责转换和桥接现场设备和企业系统之间不同的通讯标准。随着工厂、公共产业和关键基础设施的数位化提高,这些设备能够减少传统现场汇流排设备、现代乙太网路即时网路以及日益普及的原生IP云端平台之间的相容性问题。最终形成一个实用的互通性层,从而加速资料整合、降低整合风险并延长资本密集型资产的使用寿命。
网关已从纯粹的技术组件演变为战略驱动因素,如今对营运弹性、网路安全态势和资料品质计画都产生影响。采购团队不仅评估通讯协定的广度,还评估确定性效能、稳健性、生命週期支援和安全韧体管理。为此,系统整合商和原始设备製造商 (OEM) 优先考虑模组化架构,使 EtherCAT、Modbus 和 PROFINET 等经过现场验证的通讯协定能够与无线和云端连接共存。这使得系统能够逐步现代化,同时避免破坏性的彻底更换计划。
工业多重通讯协定网关格局正经历一场变革,其驱动力来自于操作技术和资讯技术的融合、工业乙太网系列的日趋成熟以及边缘原生分析的兴起。过去,通讯协定转换主要用于解决点对点不相容性问题,而如今,其关注点已扩展至运动控制应用的确定性、用于远端诊断的安全TLS隧道以及对新兴时间敏感型网路设定檔的原生支援。因此,网关架构正从被动的转换设备演变为能够进行本地预处理、事件缓衝和安全通讯协定中介的主动边缘节点。
同时,软体可配置网关和虚拟化通讯协定堆迭正成为一种明显的趋势,它们无需更换硬体即可实现快速更新和功能部署。这种模组化设计延长了产品的使用寿命,并允许供应商迭代改进安全控制、通讯协定适配器和云端连接器。此外,供应商还在整合生命週期服务,例如集中式设备管理、空中升级和遥测数据,这些服务有助于产品蓝图的发展。因此,在评估解决方案时,买家越来越关註生态系统相容性、长期支援计划以及供应商对基于标准的介面和第三方整合的承诺。
美国2025年关税政策的製定为工业网路设备製造商和供应商带来了额外的成本和供应链复杂性。对某些类别的联网工业设备征收的关税影响了筹资策略,促使许多供应商重新评估其全球製造地并实现供应商多元化,以维持利润率和按时交付。因此,在选择长期合约供应商时,采购週期现在会考虑潜在的关税调整和区域采购要求。
这些与贸易相关的波动加速了近岸外包和双重采购策略的发展,尤其是在那些服务于关键基础设施和受监管行业的供应商中,因为这些行业的供应链连续性至关重要。为了应对这些波动,一些供应商正透过本地化最终组装和建立库存缓衝来减轻关税波动的影响。同时,买家在比较不同的入口网站解决方案时,更加重视透明的总到岸成本分析,包括关税、运输成本和监管测试费用。这些发展趋势的总体影响是,供应链韧性、合约弹性和供应商财务稳定性作为供应商选择的关键因素日益受到重视。
通讯协定支援是网关选择的核心决定因素,其中两大通讯协定係列——乙太网路通讯协定和现场汇流排通讯协定-对产品蓝图的製定起着决定性作用。在乙太网路系列中,EtherCAT、EtherNet/IP 和 PROFINET 因其确定性控制和高吞吐量资料聚合的优势而日益受到青睐。同时,以 DeviceNet、Modbus 和 Profibus 为代表的现场汇流排系列,在需要成熟部署和可靠性的场合仍然至关重要。为了方便逐步升级并避免昂贵的通讯协定转换层,买家越来越倾向于选择原生支援所有这些协定係列的网关。
最终使用者应用决定了功能需求,而这些需求在资料收集、预测性维护、製程监控和远端控制等不同应用情境中差异显着。例如,资料撷取系统优先考虑高精度采样和时间戳,而预测性维护则需要安全的边缘分析和高效的事件驱动资料传输。行业特定因素也会影响产品选择。能源和电力系统需要冗余通讯路径并符合公共产业级标准,而製造业则优先考虑即时性和运动控制相容性。石油和天然气环境需要坚固耐用的机壳和本质安全特性,而交通运输网路则专注于延迟和运动容差。用水和污水则优先考虑耐腐蚀性和长生命週期支援。
连接方式已成为区分有线解决方案(包括乙太网路、光纤和串行链路)与无线方式(例如蓝牙、蜂窝网路和 Wi-Fi)的关键分界线。虽然在确定性和电磁抗干扰性至关重要的场景下,有线方案仍然是首选,但由于安装成本更低,无线方案在远端监控和维修场景中的应用持续成长。部署拓扑结构也会影响架构选择,云端基础、混合和本机部署模式会影响资料居住、边缘运算需求和整合延迟等方面的决策。最后,最终用户类型(直接最终用户、OEM 或系统整合商)会影响对客製化、生命週期支援和整合工具链的期望。 OEM 厂商通常需要紧凑的白牌模组,而係统整合商则需要可扩展的管理平台和标准化 API 来简化多站点部署。
区域特征对产品需求、法规遵循和市场推广策略有显着影响。在美洲,公共产业和製造业是关键的市场机会驱动因素,这主要得益于对维修解决方案、网路安全合规性、快速响应支援和本地服务生态系统的强劲需求。在该地区运营的供应商通常会优先考虑坚固耐用的硬体以及与北美行业通讯协定的互通性认证,以加快部署速度。
在欧洲、中东和非洲地区(EMEA),监管驱动因素和产业优先事项错综复杂,标准协调和能源转型倡议正在影响采购决策。欧洲的企业发展通常需要遵守严格的功能安全标准和环境法规,这迫使供应商证明其认证资格和全生命週期支援。在中东和北非地区(MENA),石油天然气、水务和交通运输行业的计划主导部署强调系统的稳健性和物流应对力。同时,亚太地区呈现出多元化的市场环境,拥有庞大的製造业基地、快速普及的工业自动化以及对成本优化的高度重视。支援传统现场现场汇流排系统和现代以乙太网路为基础控製网路的扩充性模组化网关解决方案在该地区尤其重要。此外,支援各种通讯基础设施和无线标准的连接选项也在推动其应用。
工业多重通讯协定网关领域的竞争格局既有成熟的自动化供应商和专业网路公司,也有新兴的、以软体为中心的新进业者。市场领导凭藉广泛的通讯协定生态系统、检验的互通性以及降低整合风险的长期支援承诺而脱颖而出。许多领先供应商声称,他们提供统一的设备管理平台、协作式韧体管治和经验丰富的现场服务,从而获得竞争优势。
同时,新参与企业和细分领域的专家在敏捷性、模组化和软体功能(例如容器化通讯协定适配器、云端连接器和支援分析的遥测技术)方面展开竞争。网关供应商与云端供应商和网路安全公司之间的合作日益普遍,这反映出一种将硬体专业知识与云端规模服务和託管安全产品相结合的策略。系统整合商和原始设备製造商 (OEM) 选择供应商时,会考虑那些能够展示持续合规蓝图并提供用于自动化配置、诊断和生命週期管理的全面工具的供应商。最终,供应商的选择取决于技术契合度、生态系统相容性以及供应商支援长期营运目标的能力之间的平衡。
产业领导者应优先考虑整合产品策略,将广泛的通讯协定覆盖范围、模组化软体架构和强大的生命週期服务相结合。为实现这一目标,供应商必须投资于安全、可更新的韧体框架和集中式设备管理,从而在不影响运行安全的前提下实现可扩展的远端维护。这些功能可降低整体拥有成本,并支援客户的长期数位化蓝图。同时,产品蓝图应强调对确定性乙太网路系列和传统现场汇流排系统的支持,以及支援跨多个垂直产业有线和无线部署的灵活连接协定堆迭。
同时,商业领域的领导者应透过多元化零件采购、尽可能将关键生产过程外包以及建立透明的最终落地成本模型来降低关税波动风险,从而提升供应链韧性。与系统整合商和云端服务供应商建立策略合作伙伴关係,将有助于扩大解决方案的覆盖范围,同时减少最终用户的整合阻力。最后,积极开放整合API、提供厂商中立的测试工具并支援基于标准的安全性规范的供应商,将有助于增强客户信任并加速大规模部署。
本研究整合了一手和二手讯息,结合供应商技术文件、标准组织出版物、监管指南以及行业相关人员访谈,对功能需求和商业性驱动因素检验。技术评估着重于通讯协定相容性矩阵、延迟和确定性特征、边缘运算能力以及安全架构;而商业分析检验了采购惯例、供应链配置和售后支援模式。透过对这些资讯来源进行三角验证,可以系统地评估产品差异化和买家优先事项,而无需依赖单一资讯来源。
我们透过与相关行业负责人(包括控制工程师、采购人员、系统整合商和产品经理)进行面对面访谈,收集了定性见解。二级资讯来源包括公开的标准化文件、供应商白皮书、监管公告以及来自权威标准机构的技术蓝图。在整个过程中,我们始终专注于以第三方一致性测试报告和经过验证的现场部署案例来佐证互通性和生命週期支援方面的论点,以确保我们的研究结果能够反映真实的运作情况。
总之,工业多重通讯协定闸道已从小众的通讯协定转换设备转型为推动工业数位化转型的基础技术,协助传统资产与现代控制系统和云端基础分析的整合。其不断演进的角色不仅涵盖通讯协定中介功能,还包括边缘智慧、安全远端系统管理和生命週期保障,从而降低整合复杂性并支援可扩展的现代化改造。因此,买卖双方都必须从综合观点评估解决方案,考虑通讯协定覆盖范围、边缘运算能力、供应链稳健性和生态系统伙伴关係。
展望未来,将技术适用性与实际营运情况结合的务实方法将是成功部署的关键。这意味着选择网关时,应确保其在需要时提供确定性的性能,同时支援通讯协定和现代通讯协定,并由拥有可靠支援和灵活製造能力的供应商提供。透过专注于互通性、安全性和生命週期服务,相关人员可以释放网关的战略价值,并将其视为建构弹性、资料驱动型工业营运的基础架构。
The Industrial Multiprotocol Gateways Market is projected to grow by USD 7.38 billion at a CAGR of 12.70% by 2032.
| KEY MARKET STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Base Year [2024] | USD 2.83 billion |
| Estimated Year [2025] | USD 3.20 billion |
| Forecast Year [2032] | USD 7.38 billion |
| CAGR (%) | 12.70% |
Industrial multiprotocol gateways occupy a strategic role in modern automation architectures by translating and bridging diverse communication standards between field devices and enterprise systems. As factories, utilities, and critical infrastructure digitize, these devices mitigate compatibility friction among legacy fieldbus installations, contemporary Ethernet real-time networks, and increasingly IP-native cloud platforms. The result is a pragmatic interoperability layer that accelerates data consolidation, reduces integration risk, and extends the life of capital-intensive assets.
Moving from purely technical components to strategic enablers, gateways now influence operational resilience, cybersecurity posture, and data quality initiatives. Procurement teams evaluate them not only on protocol breadth but also on deterministic performance, ruggedness, lifecycle support, and secure firmware management. In turn, system integrators and OEMs prioritize modular architectures that allow field-proven protocols such as EtherCAT, Modbus, and PROFINET to coexist with wireless and cloud-oriented connectivity, enabling phased modernization without disruptive rip-and-replace projects.
The landscape for industrial multiprotocol gateways is undergoing transformative shifts driven by the convergence of operational technology and information technology, the maturation of industrial Ethernet families, and the push toward edge-native analytics. Historically, protocol translation addressed point-to-point incompatibilities; today, the emphasis has broadened to include determinism for motion control applications, secure TLS-backed tunneling for remote diagnostics, and native support for emerging time-sensitive networking profiles. Consequently, gateway architectures have evolved from passive translators to active edge nodes capable of local preprocessing, event buffering, and secure protocol mediation.
Concurrently, there is a discernible shift toward software-configurable gateways and virtualized protocol stacks that allow rapid updates and feature rollouts without hardware swaps. This modularity supports greater product longevity and enables vendors to iterate on security controls, protocol adapters, and cloud connectors. Moreover, vendors are integrating lifecycle services such as centralized device management, over-the-air updates, and telemetry that inform product roadmaps. As a result, purchasers increasingly evaluate solutions on their ecosystem compatibility, long-term support plans, and the extent to which providers commit to standards-based interfaces and third-party integrations.
United States tariff policy developments in 2025 introduced additional cost variables and supply chain complexity for manufacturers and suppliers of industrial networking hardware. Tariffs applied to certain categories of networked industrial equipment have affected component sourcing strategies, prompting many vendors to re-evaluate global manufacturing footprints and supplier diversification to maintain margin and delivery commitments. As a consequence, procurement cycles now account for potential tariff adjustments and regional content requirements when qualifying suppliers for long-term contracts.
These trade-related shifts have also accelerated interest in nearshoring and dual-sourcing strategies, particularly for vendors supplying to critical infrastructure and regulated industries where supply continuity is paramount. In response, some providers have localized final assembly or increased inventory buffers to mitigate the impact of tariff volatility. At the same time, buyers are placing greater emphasis on transparent total landed cost analyses, including duties, freight, and regulatory testing, when comparing gateway solutions. The overarching effect is a heightened focus on supply chain resilience, contractual flexibility, and supplier financial stability as material factors in vendor selection.
Protocol support remains a central determinant of gateway selection, with two broad protocol families shaping product roadmaps: Ethernet Protocols and Fieldbus Protocols. Within the Ethernet family, EtherCAT, EtherNet/IP, and PROFINET command attention for deterministic control and high-throughput data aggregation, while the Fieldbus family-exemplified by DeviceNet, Modbus, and Profibus-continues to be relevant where installed base considerations and proven reliability matter. Buyers are increasingly drawn to gateways that offer native support across these families to enable phased upgrades and to avoid costly protocol conversion layers.
End use application drives functional requirements, which vary significantly between data acquisition, predictive maintenance, process monitoring, and remote control use cases. For instance, data acquisition implementations prioritize high-fidelity sampling and timestamping, whereas predictive maintenance use cases require secure edge analytics and efficient event-driven data forwarding. Industry vertical considerations further nuance product selection; energy and power systems demand redundant communication paths and compliance with utility-grade standards, manufacturing emphasizes real-time determinism and motion control compatibility, oil and gas settings call for ruggedized enclosures and intrinsic safety considerations, transportation networks focus on latency and mobility resilience, and water and wastewater deployments prioritize corrosion resistance and long lifecycle support.
Connectivity type has emerged as a bifurcation point between wired solutions-encompassing Ethernet, fiber optic, and serial links-and wireless modalities such as Bluetooth, cellular, and Wi-Fi. Wired options remain preferred where determinism and electromagnetic immunity are critical, while wireless continues to gain traction in remote monitoring and retrofit scenarios due to lower installation overhead. Deployment topology also shapes architectural choices, with cloud based, hybrid, and on premises models each influencing decisions around data residency, edge compute needs, and integration latency. Finally, the end user profile-whether direct end users, OEMs, or system integrators-affects expectations for customization, lifecycle support, and integration toolchains; OEMs often seek compact, white-label modules while system integrators require scalable management platforms and standardized APIs to streamline multi-site rollouts.
Regional dynamics exert a pronounced influence on product requirements, regulatory conformity, and go-to-market tactics across the global landscape. In the Americas, demand tends to emphasize retrofit solutions, cybersecurity compliance, and a preference for rapid support and local service ecosystems, with utilities and manufacturing driving significant opportunities. Vendors operating in the Americas often prioritize ruggedized hardware and certified interoperability with prevalent North American industrial protocols to shorten deployment timelines.
Europe, Middle East & Africa exhibits a mosaic of regulatory drivers and industry priorities where standards harmonization and energy transition initiatives shape procurement. European operations frequently require adherence to stringent functional safety and environmental regulations, prompting vendors to demonstrate certification credentials and lifecycle support. In the Middle East and Africa, project-driven deployments in oil and gas, water, and transportation emphasize robustness and logistics readiness. Meanwhile, Asia-Pacific presents a diverse market set where high-volume manufacturing centers, rapid industrial automation adoption, and a strong emphasis on cost optimization coexist. In this region, scalable, modular gateway solutions that support both legacy fieldbus systems and modern Ethernet-based control networks are particularly valued, and connectivity options that accommodate varied telecom infrastructures and wireless standards tend to accelerate adoption.
Competitive dynamics in the industrial multiprotocol gateway space blend established automation suppliers with specialized networking firms and emerging software-centric entrants. Market leaders differentiate through broad protocol ecosystems, validated interoperability, and long-term support commitments that reduce integration risk. Many prominent vendors assert advantages by offering integrated device management platforms, coordinated firmware governance, and experienced field services to support complex multi-vendor environments.
At the same time, newer entrants and niche specialists compete on agility, modularity, and software-enabled features such as containerized protocol adapters, cloud connectors, and analytics-ready telemetry. Partnerships between gateway vendors and cloud providers or cybersecurity firms are increasingly common, reflecting a strategy to pair hardware expertise with cloud-scale services and managed security offerings. System integrators and OEMs choose suppliers who can demonstrate a roadmap for continued standards compliance and who provide comprehensive tools for automated configuration, diagnostics, and lifecycle management. Ultimately, supplier selection hinges on a balance between technical fit, ecosystem compatibility, and the vendor's ability to support long-term operational objectives.
Industry leaders should prioritize integrated product strategies that combine broad protocol coverage with modular software architectures and robust lifecycle services. To achieve this, vendors must invest in secure, updateable firmware frameworks and centralized device management that enable scalable, remote maintenance without compromising operational safety. Such capabilities reduce total cost of ownership and support customers' long-term digitalization roadmaps. Simultaneously, product roadmaps should emphasize support for both deterministic Ethernet families and legacy fieldbus systems, as well as flexible connectivity stacks that accommodate wired and wireless deployments across multiple verticals.
In parallel, commercial leaders should pursue supply chain resilience through diversified component sourcing, nearshoring of critical production steps where feasible, and transparent total landed cost modeling to mitigate tariff-driven volatility. Strategic partnerships with systems integrators and cloud providers can expand solution footprints while reducing integration friction for end users. Finally, vendors that proactively publish open integration APIs, provide vendor-neutral testing artifacts, and support standards-based security profiles will strengthen customer trust and accelerate large-scale rollouts.
This research synthesized primary and secondary intelligence, combining vendor technical documentation, standards body publications, regulatory guidance, and interviews with industry stakeholders to validate functional requirements and commercial drivers. Technical assessments focused on protocol compatibility matrices, latency and determinism characteristics, edge compute capabilities, and security architectures, while commercial analysis examined procurement practices, supply chain configurations, and post-sale support models. Triangulation of these sources enabled a structured appraisal of product differentiation and buyer priorities without relying on a single input stream.
Where direct interviews informed qualitative insights, respondents included control engineers, procurement leads, system integrators, and product managers across relevant verticals. Secondary sources comprised publicly available standards documentation, vendor white papers, regulatory notices, and technology roadmaps from recognized standards organizations. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on corroborating claims of interoperability and lifecycle support through third-party conformance testing reports and documented field deployments to ensure findings reflect practical operational realities.
In conclusion, industrial multiprotocol gateways have transitioned from niche protocol translators to strategic enablers of industrial digital transformation, underpinning efforts to harmonize legacy assets with modern control systems and cloud-based analytics. Their evolving role encompasses not only protocol mediation but also edge intelligence, secure remote management, and lifecycle assurance, which together reduce integration complexity and support scalable modernization efforts. Buyers and vendors alike must therefore evaluate solutions through an integrated lens that accounts for protocol breadth, edge capabilities, supply chain robustness, and ecosystem partnerships.
Looking ahead, successful adoption will hinge on pragmatic approaches that marry technical fit with operational realities: selecting gateways that provide deterministic performance where required, that support legacy and modern protocols concurrently, and that are backed by vendors with credible support and adaptable manufacturing footprints. By focusing on interoperability, security, and lifecycle services, stakeholders can unlock the strategic value of gateways as foundational infrastructure for resilient, data-driven industrial operations.