流体化媒裂市场按组成、成分、原料类型、装置产能和最终用户划分－2025-2032年全球预测

预计到 2032 年，流体化媒裂(FCC) 市场将成长至 124 亿美元，复合年增长率为 5.54%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2024	80.5亿美元
预计年份：2025年	84.8亿美元
预测年份 2032	124亿美元
复合年增长率 (%)	5.54%

本文全面阐述了催化剂组成、反应器设计和原料选择如何共同塑造现代流体化媒裂竞争格局。

流体化媒裂是炼油过程中的关键转化途径，使炼油厂能够将较重的烃类馏分转化为一系列较轻、高价值的产品。此製程整合了复杂的催化剂系统、反应器/再生器结构以及多种原料，这些因素共同决定了产品的灵活性和经济效益。随着炼油厂追求更高的利润率和更低的排放，授权合作伙伴、催化剂配方商和营运商正致力于开发兼顾催化剂活性和选择性、运作稳定性和脱碳路径的解决方案。

技术发展主要集中在沸石基催化剂上，旨在提高汽油和低碳烯烃的产率，同时维持催化剂的循环寿命和污染物耐受性。反应器内件、热整合和製程控制系统的同步进步提高了装置的可靠性和检修的可预测性。此外，炼油厂也越来越重视各种配置方案的权衡，例如并联式与堆迭式配置，以及它们对产能灵活性和维护复杂性的影响。

在此背景下，策略性相关人员必须将从真空瓦斯油到重质残渣油和脱沥青油等原料的多样性与催化剂的选择和装置产能规划相符。粘合剂、填料和基质的选择，以及沸石种类（例如Y型沸石和ZSM-5沸石）的选择，不仅影响转化率和选择性，还会影响催化剂的损耗和废催化剂的处理。因此，对于寻求永续营运优势的炼油厂管理者和技术投资者而言，将催化剂组分设计与装置配置、原料特性和最终用户产品目标联繫起来的整体观点至关重要。

技术、数位化和永续性的整合需求正在重塑流体化媒裂中的催化剂设计、单元操作和伙伴关係模式。

流体化媒裂（FCC）领域正经历变革性的转变，面临排放法规、产品需求结构和原料经济性这三大同时存在的压力。为了应对日益严格的燃料品质和排放气体法规，炼油厂正在重新优化其产品结构，转向低硫燃料和提高低碳烯烃的产量，这促使催化剂库存和反应器策略进行重组。为此，催化剂开发商正致力于开发多功能沸石结构和稳健的基质，以平衡催化活性和抗金属及碳基结垢的能力。

技术变革不仅限于催化化学，还延伸至数位化和自动化领域。先进的製程控制系统、用于预测装置性能的机器学习模型以及即时原料表征，能够实现对反应条件的精确控制和对故障的快速响应。这些能力减少了非计画性停机时间，并提高了循环寿命预测的准确性，而随着炼油厂不断延长运作，循环寿命预测的重要性也日益凸显。

供应链中同步发生的结构性变化正在重塑采购模式和伙伴关係。授权人、催化剂製造商和下游石化产品承购商之间的策略联盟日益普遍，促进了对製程改进的联合投资，从而提高乙烯和丙烯等特定产品的产量。此外，对永续性重视推动了低碳氢化合物整合、余热回收以及废催化剂循环利用等试点计画的发展。因此，那些将化学创新与数位技术和卓越营运相结合的行业参与者，正在为在产品品质和环境合规性共同决定竞争优势的市场中脱颖而出做好准备。

美国贸易措施变化对催化剂采购、计划经济效益和原材料采购的实际影响：对策略规划和供应链韧性的启示

近期关税政策的变化进一步加剧了在美国营运或与美国进行贸易的企业在采购、资本计划和原料筹资策略的复杂性。关税可能会影响催化剂组分的相对投入成本，尤其是那些从拥有专业沸石技术或专有基质的国际供应商处采购的催化剂成分。随着采购负责人重新审视其供应链，一些炼油企业正优先考虑与国内或免税合作伙伴签订长期供应协议，以确保催化剂的稳定供应并降低成本波动。

关税也会影响设备采购以及装置维修和新建设的EPC合约决策。进口的反应器内件、热交换器和催化处理系统需缴纳额外关税，这会增加总安装成本和计划前置作业时间，迫使业者考虑在地化生产或重新安排资本投资。在许多情况下，监管成本的变化会促使人们重新审视生命週期成本，包括催化剂寿命、再生频率和废催化剂的处置成本。

从市场互动角度来看，关税引发的价格差异可能会加速采用替代原料混合物和催化剂等级，从而减少对关税敏感型进口产品的依赖；同时，一体化石化炼厂可能会重新评估产品路线和合约条款以维持利润率。转型策略将日益强调灵活的产品组合，能够根据不断变化的商业性讯号在柴油、汽油和轻烯烃生产之间灵活切换，从而降低供应链中断和政策驱动的成本波动所带来的风险。

基于详细细分的洞察，将催化剂组成、配置选择、原料变化、装置产能规模和最终用户产品优先顺序与营运结果连结起来。

细緻的細項分析揭示了组件选择、装置结构、原料选择、产能规划和最终用户目标如何共同影响营运优先事项和投资决策。组件维度突显了黏合剂、填料、基质材料和沸石催化剂类型之间的相互作用。 Y型沸石通常用于高转化率、以汽油为主的生产目标，而ZSM-5则用于低碳烯烃的生产和提高烯烃与芳烃的选择性。这些组件层级之间的权衡会影响损耗行为和废催化剂管理义务，进而影响总拥有成本。

配置方式（例如并联式与堆迭式配置）会影响温度控管、反应器-再生器相互作用以及维护计划。并联式配置在简化循环系统和提高可维护性方面具有优势，而堆迭式配置则可能提高占地面积效率并提供不同的热整合方案。原料类型仍然是决定操作策略的关键因素。虽然真空瓦斯油通常表现出可预测的裂化行为，但较重的残渣油和脱沥青油的污染物含量和焦炭生成倾向则表现出更大的变异性，因此需要具有更高金属耐受性和基质稳定性的催化剂。

将装置产能划分为大型、中型和小型，决定了资本配置、产能灵活性和检修经济性。大型装置享有规模经济效益，但需要更复杂的物流和催化剂库存管理。而小型装置则受惠于可根据区域需求趋势灵活调整产品组合。最后，终端用户细分——从柴油生产到汽油生产再到轻质烯烃（包括乙烯和丙烯）生产——驱动着有针对性的催化剂设计和运行策略。以柴油生产为主的炼油厂会优化氢气管理和十六烷值提升策略，而以低碳烯烃为主的炼油厂则会采用富ZSM-5催化剂体系和有利于提高烯烃产率的反应器条件。因此，基于细分市场的策略能够帮助炼油厂将技术选择与商业目标和监管限制相匹配。

区域原料状况、监管压力和石化产品需求趋势如何驱动美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的不同战略路径。

区域趋势将对原料供应、监管压力和投资前景产生重大影响，从而在各区域形成不同的策略方针。美洲地区原油成分多样化，国内需求结构也在不断变化（运输燃料和石化原料需求之间的平衡日益增强），因此，随着石化一体化的加深，该地区将更倾向于采用灵活的催化剂体系和改进措施，以推动产品结构转向低碳烯烃。

在欧洲、中东和非洲地区，日益严格的监管和脱碳要求在各种炼油技术水准和原料类型中并存。一些炼油厂正在推进数位化和能源效率升级，而另一些炼油厂则优先考虑在原料供应受限的情况下提高产能韧性，并有选择地投资于能够耐受高金属和硫含量的触媒技术。在中东，丰富的重质原料和接近性石化联合企业的地理优势推动了烯烃收率的最大化，而非洲部分地区则专注于模组化或小规模维修，以满足区域燃料需求和燃料品质标准。

亚太地区正经历石化产品需求快速成长、大规模炼油厂现代化计画以及区域性环境法规差异等多重挑战。亚太多个市场对低碳烯烃的强劲需求推动了针对乙烯和丙烯优化的催化剂配方的应用。同时，该地区的产能扩张计划促进了授权人、催化剂供应商和当地工程公司之间的伙伴关係，以缩短前置作业时间并根据区域原料特性调整设计。总体而言，区域策略体现了在当地原料条件、法规结构以及工业和石化产品需求成长速度之间取得的平衡。

不断变化的竞争动态：以结果为导向的伙伴关係、供应链多元化和整合服务平台将决定供应商的选择和长期合作价值。

催化剂和技术供应生态系统内的竞争动态正朝着基于平台的差异化、更深入的服务以及合作商业化模式转变。领先的催化剂开发商和授权商正日益将专有配方技术与性能保证、扩展技术支援和以分析主导的生命週期服务相结合，从而帮助炼油厂优化生产週期和产品收率。这一趋势正在加速从一次性催化剂销售向以结果为导向的伙伴关係关係的转变，其中技术支援、现场故障排除和共同资助的示范计划是核心。

供应链韧性正逐渐成为一种竞争优势，供应商正透过多元化製造地和寻找替代原材料来源来降低贸易中断带来的风险。此外，催化剂製造商、化学品承购商和设备製造商之间的跨行业合作，正在推动整合解决方案的开发，从而加快资本部署并降低性能风险。智慧财产权策略也反映了这一演变，企业越来越多地保护其沸石和基质技术，同时选择性地授权相关製程改进技术以扩大市场覆盖范围。

併购、策略联盟以及对数位化能力的定向投资正在重塑竞争格局。那些能够有效结合深厚的材料科学专业知识、先进的製程分析技术和强大的售后服务能力的公司，正在赢得长期的业务。同时，提供特种催化剂和快速检测服务的利基企业，透过解决特定的污染物难题并帮助新配方快速放大生产，正在开闢独特的市场地位。对于采购者而言，这些趋势意味着更多的选择，但也意味着供应商选择更加复杂，需要进行严格的技术实质审查和基于情境的供应商评估。

为炼油厂和供应商制定可操作的、优先的策略，以增强韧性、优化催化剂性能，并使资本配置与不断变化的产品需求和永续性目标保持一致。

产业领导者应采取多管齐下的策略方法，整合催化剂选择、运作弹性和商业性灵活性，以确保其流体化媒裂装置面向未来。首先，应优先考虑能够有效平衡活性和选择性，同时允许金属和焦炭沉积的催化剂策略，并在全面部署前投资进行中初步试验，以具有代表性的重质原料混合物检验其性能。透过迭代式进度管理，他们可以在控制技术风险的同时，收穫产品收率提升带来的益处。

第二，透过与多元化供应商签订多年期合同，并对关键催化剂组分和反应器内件的区域製造合作伙伴进行认证，增强供应链韧性。同时，建立模组化采购机制，实现供应商的快速更换和品质检验，从而减轻关税和贸易中断的影响。第三，投资于数位双胞胎、预测性维护演算法和即时原料表征，以减少非计划性停机时间并优化再生计画。这些工具能够显着提高运转率和催化剂利用率。

第四，考虑维修方案，允许在柴油、汽油和轻烯烃生产之间进行切换，以使资本配置与产品需求的灵活性相匹配。尽可能与石化合作伙伴建立承购协议和与承购相关的融资，以共用风险并从烯烃成长中获取价值。最后，推动旨在降低排放强度和提高废催化剂循环利用率的永续性倡议。这些努力将有助于建立监管信心并实现长期成本节约。综上所述，这些措施共同构成了一种具有韧性和适应性的方法，既能平衡短期营运效益，又能为不断变化的市场动态提供策略定位。

我们采用透明的多来源调查方法，结合一手技术访谈、营运资料三角验证、供应链评估和情境分析，以确保获得可靠、可操作的见解。

本研究整合了多种技术和商业性证据来源，流体化媒裂（FCC）领域进行了系统性分析。调查方法结合了来自技术经理、製程工程师和采购主管的定性资讯、技术文献、授权人揭露文件以及非专有营运案例研究等二手资料。资料三角验证确保研究结果既反映了实际工厂运作情况，也反映了供应商报告的性能特征；同时，专家检验环节则用于消除资料差异，并揭示实际应用中需要考虑的因素。

製程层面的评估是基于催化剂表征、失活曲线分析以及反应器/再生器动态，并辅以运行数据（如有），例如循环週期分布和检修记录。供应链分析结合采购前置作业时间研究、采购强度指标和关税影响评估，以了解商业性脆弱性。情境分析用于探索原材料价格波动、关税制度和终端用户需求调整的敏感性，从而能够在不同的运行环境下提出可靠的建议。

本研究始终强调技术的可重复性和透明度。关于原料性质、催化剂损耗机制和特定配置性能的假设均已记录并经过压力测试。凡涉及专有资讯之处，均由独立技术专家进行交叉检验，以确保研究结果的客观性和对决策者的实际意义。

本文对策略要务进行了简洁扼要的总结，重点在于基于系统的催化剂选择、供应链韧性和数位化赋能的营运绩效，以实现永续的竞争优势。

综合分析表明，流体化媒裂领域的竞争优势日益依赖一种综合方法，该方法融合了先进的催化剂化学、稳健的供应链以及数位化赋能的卓越运作。营运商若将催化剂选择视为系统决策——结合配置、原料和最终用户的优先级，评估黏合剂、填料、基质的选择以及沸石变体——将获得更可预测的结果并降低生命週期成本。此外，营运商还需要製定灵活的策略，充分考虑区域特征和贸易政策趋势，以适应原料供应和关税波动导致的成本结构变化。

与技术供应商建立以结果为导向的伙伴关係，并利用预测分析进行维护和原料优化，这些公司更有可能维持更高的运转率和更优的产品产量。最终，实现价值的关键在于平衡短期营运效益与中期永续性和循环经济投资，从而保障业务永续营运的权利，并为更高价值的石化一体化铺路。因此，决策者应优先考虑模组化升级、稳健的供应商多元化以及有针对性的试验计画，以便在广泛应用之前检验创新成果。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场概览

第五章 市场洞察

• 采用新型沸石基催化剂可最大限度地提高FCC装置中丙烯的产率。
• 实施人工智慧驱动的製程控制系统，以实现FCC反应器的即时最佳化
• 将碳捕获技术整合到FCC装置中，以减少二氧化碳排放和环境影响。
• 利用残余改质催化剂对现有FCC装置进行改造，以处理重质原油混合物
• 在FCC中对可再生和生物基原料进行共加工，以实现脱碳目标
• 开发脱硫添加剂以减少FCC再生器废气中的SOx排放
• 优化催化剂循环速率，以提高转化效率并延长循环时间
• 引入线上粒径分析仪，用于监测FCC装置中催化剂的损耗和活性。

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章流体化媒裂市场：按组分划分

• 活页夹
• 填料
• 基材
• 沸石催化剂
  • Y型沸石
  • ZSM-5沸石

第九章流体化媒裂市场：依组成

• 平行型
• 堆迭式

第十章 依原料类型流体化媒裂市场

• 沥青油
• 残留物
• 真空瓦斯油

第十一章 依产能分類的流体化媒裂市场

• 大容量
• 中等容量
• 小容量

第十二章流体化媒裂市场（依最终用户划分）

• 柴油生产
• 汽油产量
• 轻烯烃生产
  • 乙烯
  • 丙烯

第十三章流体化媒裂市场区域分析

• 美洲
  • 北美洲
  • 拉丁美洲
• 欧洲、中东和非洲
  • 欧洲
  • 中东
  • 非洲
• 亚太地区

第十四章流体化媒裂市场：依组别划分

• ASEAN
• GCC
• EU
• BRICS
• G7
• NATO

第十五章 各国流体化媒裂市场

• 美国
• 加拿大
• 墨西哥
• 巴西
• 英国
• 德国
• 法国
• 俄罗斯
• 义大利
• 西班牙
• 中国
• 印度
• 日本
• 澳洲
• 韩国

第十六章 竞争格局

• 2024年市占率分析
• FPNV定位矩阵，2024
• 竞争分析
  • Axens Joint Stock Company
  • BASF SE
  • CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
  • Chevron Lummus Global
  • DuPont de Nemours, Inc
  • Emerson Electric Co.
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Flour Corporation
  • Honeywell International Inc.
  • JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
  • Johnson Matthey Group.
  • Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation
  • Kuwait Catalyst Company.
  • Magma Group
  • NE CHEMCAT Corporation
  • Naugra
  • Shell PLC
  • Sulzer Ltd.
  • WR Grace Company
  • Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD
  • Zeopore Technologies NV

The Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market is projected to grow by USD 12.40 billion at a CAGR of 5.54% by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2024]	USD 8.05 billion
Estimated Year [2025]	USD 8.48 billion
Forecast Year [2032]	USD 12.40 billion
CAGR (%)	5.54%

Comprehensive context on how catalyst formulation, reactor design, and feedstock choices converge to shape modern fluid catalytic cracking competitiveness

Fluid catalytic cracking remains a cornerstone conversion route within refining, enabling refiners to convert heavier hydrocarbon fractions into lighter, higher-value streams. The process integrates complex catalyst systems, reactor/regenerator architectures, and a broad range of feedstocks, which together determine product slate flexibility and economic performance. As refineries pursue higher margins and lower emissions footprints, licensing partners, catalyst formulators, and operating companies are aligning around solutions that combine catalyst activity and selectivity with operational resilience and decarbonization pathways.

The technology trajectory has emphasized zeolite-based catalysts to enhance gasoline and light olefins yields while maintaining catalyst cycle length and contaminant tolerance. Parallel advances in reactor internals, heat integration, and process control systems have improved unit reliability and turnaround predictability. Moreover, refiners are increasingly evaluating the trade-offs between configuration choices such as side-by-side versus stacked arrangements, and their implications for throughput flexibility and maintenance complexity.

Against this backdrop, strategic stakeholders must reconcile feedstock variability, from vacuum gas oil to heavier residues and deasphalted oils, with catalyst selection and unit capacity planning. Decisions around binder, filler, matrix choices and zeolite variants like Zeolite Y and ZSM-5 affect not only conversion and selectivity but also catalyst attrition and spent catalyst handling. Consequently, a holistic view that links catalyst component design to configuration, feedstock characteristics, and end-user product targets is essential for refining managers and technology investors seeking sustained operational advantage.

How converging technical, digital, and sustainability imperatives are reshaping catalyst design, unit operations, and partnership models in fluid catalytic cracking

The landscape of fluid catalytic cracking is undergoing transformative shifts driven by simultaneous pressures on emissions, product demand composition, and feedstock economics. Refiners are responding to stricter fuel quality and emissions expectations by re-optimizing product slates toward lower-sulfur fuels and increased light olefins output, prompting reconfiguration of catalyst inventories and reactor strategies. In turn, catalyst developers are placing greater emphasis on multi-functional zeolite architectures and robust matrices that balance activity with resistance to metals and carbonaceous fouling.

Technological shifts extend beyond catalyst chemistry to encompass digitalization and automation. Advanced process control systems, machine learning models for unit performance prediction, and real-time feedstock characterization are enabling tighter control of reaction conditions and faster responses to disturbances. These capabilities reduce unplanned downtime and enhance cycle-life prediction, which matters increasingly as refiners push for longer on-stream periods between major turnarounds.

Concurrent structural changes in the supply chain are reshaping procurement and partnership models. Strategic alliances between licensors, catalyst manufacturers, and downstream petrochemical off-takers are becoming more common, facilitating co-investment in process upgrades that increase yields of targeted products such as ethylene and propylene. Additionally, rising emphasis on sustainability is driving trials of lower-carbon hydrogen integration, waste heat recovery, and circular approaches for spent catalyst management. As a result, industry participants that integrate chemical innovation with digital and operational excellence are differentiating themselves in a market where both product quality and environmental compliance increasingly determine competitive positioning.

Practical implications of changing US trade measures on catalyst procurement, project economics, and feedstock sourcing that influence strategic planning and supply-chain resilience

Recent tariff activity has introduced added complexity to procurement, capital projects, and feedstock sourcing strategies for entities operating within and trading with the United States. Tariff measures can alter relative input costs for catalyst components sourced from international suppliers, particularly those with specialized zeolite technologies and proprietary matrices. As procurement respondents reassess supply chains, some refiners are favoring longer-term supply agreements with domestic or tariff-exempt partners to stabilize catalyst availability and mitigate cost volatility.

Tariffs also influence decisions around equipment sourcing and EPC contracting for unit revamps or new builds. When imported reactor internals, heat exchangers, or catalyst handling systems become subject to additional duties, the total installed cost and project lead times can increase, prompting operators to revisit whether to localize manufacturing or re-sequence capital investments. In many cases, regulatory-induced cost shifts encourage greater scrutiny of lifecycle costs, including catalyst longevity, regeneration frequency, and spent catalyst disposal expenses.

From a market interaction perspective, tariff-induced price differentials may accelerate the adoption of alternative feedstock blends or catalyst grades that reduce dependence on tariff-sensitive imports. Meanwhile, refiners with integrated petrochemical off-takes may re-balance product routing and contractual terms to preserve margins. Transition strategies increasingly emphasize flexible configurations that allow shifting between diesel, gasoline, and light olefins production as commercial signals evolve, thereby reducing exposure to supply-chain shocks and policy-driven cost swings.

Detailed segmentation-driven insights linking catalyst components, configuration choices, feedstock variability, unit capacity scales, and end-user product priorities to operational outcomes

A nuanced segmentation analysis reveals how component choices, unit architecture, feedstock selection, capacity planning, and end-user objectives collectively shape operational priorities and investment decisions. The components dimension highlights the interplay between binder, filler, matrix materials and zeolite catalyst varieties, where Zeolite Y often addresses high-conversion gasoline-leaning targets while ZSM-5 is deployed to enhance light olefins production and olefin-to-aromatics selectivity. These component-level trade-offs influence attrition behavior and spent catalyst management obligations, which in turn affect total cost of ownership.

Configuration considerations such as side-by-side versus stacked types affect heat management, reactor-regenerator interactions, and maintenance scheduling. Side-by-side configurations can offer simpler circulation and accessibility advantages, whereas stacked architectures may provide footprint efficiencies and different heat integration opportunities. Feedstock type remains a central determinant of operational strategy; vacuum gas oil typically yields predictable cracking behavior, while heavier residues and deasphalted oil introduce greater variability in contaminant load and coke propensity, requiring catalysts with enhanced metals tolerance and matrix robustness.

Unit capacity segmentation into large, medium, and small scales informs capital allocation, throughput flexibility, and turnaround economics. Large-capacity installations benefit from economies of scale but demand more sophisticated logistics and catalyst inventory management, whereas smaller units can offer nimbleness to shift product slates for regional demand signals. Finally, end-user segmentation-ranging from diesel production and gasoline production to light olefins production, the latter encompassing ethylene and propylene-drives targeted catalyst designs and operating philosophies. Refiners prioritizing diesel will optimize for hydrogen management and cetane-enhancing strategies, while those oriented to light olefins will deploy ZSM-5-enriched systems and reactor conditions that favor olefin yields. Consequently, a segmentation-aware strategy enables operators to align technological choices with commercial objectives and regulatory constraints.

How regional feedstock realities, regulatory pressures, and petrochemical demand trajectories create distinct strategic pathways across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics exert a strong influence on feedstock availability, regulatory pressures, and investment horizons, shaping distinct strategic approaches in each geography. In the Americas, refiners contend with diverse crude slates and a shifting domestic demand profile that increasingly balances transportation fuels with petrochemical feedstock needs; this environment favors flexible catalyst systems and retrofits that can pivot product slates toward light olefins as petrochemical integration intensifies.

Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory and decarbonization imperatives co-exist with a wide range of refining sophistication and feedstock types. Some refiners are advancing digital and energy-efficiency upgrades while others prioritize resilience amid feedstock limitations, prompting selective investments in catalyst technologies that tolerate higher metals and sulfur burdens. In the Middle East, abundant heavier feedstocks and close proximity to petrochemical complexes create incentives for maximizing olefin yields, whereas parts of Africa focus on modular or smaller-capacity retrofits to meet local fuel demand and fuel quality standards.

The Asia-Pacific region presents a heterogeneous mix of rapid petrochemical demand growth, expansive refinery modernization programs, and varying environmental regulations. High demand growth for light olefins in several Asia-Pacific markets has driven adoption of catalyst formulations optimized for ethylene and propylene. Simultaneously, capacity expansion projects in the region are prompting partnerships between licensors, catalyst suppliers, and local engineering firms to reduce lead times and adapt designs to regional feedstock profiles. Taken together, regional strategies reflect a balance between local feedstock realities, regulatory frameworks, and the pace of industrial and petrochemical demand growth.

Evolving competitive dynamics where outcome-focused partnerships, supply-chain diversification, and integrated service platforms determine supplier selection and long-term collaboration value

Competitive dynamics within the catalytic and technology supply ecosystem are shifting towards platform-based differentiation, deeper service offerings, and collaborative commercialization models. Leading catalyst developers and licensors are increasingly coupling proprietary formulations with performance guarantees, extended technical support, and analytics-driven lifecycle services that help refiners optimize cycle lengths and product yields. This trend is accelerating the transition from transactional catalyst sales to outcome-oriented partnerships where technical support, on-site troubleshooting, and co-funded demonstration projects play a central role.

Supply chain resilience has emerged as a competitive axis, prompting suppliers to diversify manufacturing footprints and to qualify alternate raw material sources to reduce vulnerability to trade disruptions. Furthermore, cross-sector collaborations-linking catalyst manufacturers with chemical off-takers and equipment fabricators-are facilitating integrated solutions that accelerate capital deployment and de-risk performance. Intellectual property strategies also reflect this evolution, with firms protecting zeolite innovations and matrix technologies while selectively licensing adjacent process improvements to expand market reach.

Mergers, strategic alliances, and targeted investments in digital capability are reshaping the competitive map. Companies that successfully combine deep materials science expertise with advanced process analytics and strong aftermarket service capabilities are winning longer-term engagements. At the same time, niche players offering specialist catalyst grades or rapid testing services are carving out roles by addressing specific contaminant challenges or by enabling faster scale-up of new formulations. For purchasers, these dynamics mean greater choice but also greater complexity in vendor selection, requiring rigorous technical due diligence and scenario-based supplier evaluations.

Actionable, prioritized strategies for refiners and suppliers to enhance resilience, optimize catalyst performance, and align capital deployment with evolving product demand and sustainability goals

Industry leaders should adopt a multifaceted strategic approach that aligns catalyst selection, operational resilience, and commercial flexibility to future-proof fluid catalytic cracking assets. First, prioritize catalyst strategies that explicitly balance activity and selectivity with robustness against metals and carbonaceous deposition; invest in pilot trials that validate performance on representative heavier feedstock blends before full-scale implementation. By proceeding iteratively, operators can manage technical risk while capturing upside in product yield improvements.

Second, strengthen supply-chain resilience by negotiating multi-year agreements with diversified suppliers and by qualifying regional manufacturing partners for critical catalyst components and reactor internals. Simultaneously, build modular procurement playbooks that allow for rapid supplier substitution and expedited quality validation, thereby mitigating tariffs or trade disruptions. Third, invest in digital twins, predictive maintenance algorithms, and real-time feedstock characterization to reduce unplanned downtime and to optimize regeneration schedules; these tools materially enhance uptime and catalyst utilization efficiency.

Fourth, align capital allocation with product demand flexibility by considering retrofit options that enable shifting between diesel, gasoline, and light olefins production. Where possible, structure off-take and offtake-linked financing with petrochemical partners to share risk and capture value from olefins growth. Finally, pursue sustainability initiatives that reduce emissions intensity and improve spent catalyst circularity, as these efforts can yield regulatory goodwill and long-term cost savings. Together, these steps create a resilient, adaptable approach that balances near-term operational gains with strategic positioning for evolving market dynamics.

Transparent multi-source research methodology combining primary technical interviews, operational data triangulation, supply-chain assessment, and scenario analysis to ensure robust actionable insights

This research synthesizes multi-source technical and commercial evidence to deliver a coherent analysis of the fluid catalytic cracking domain. The methodology integrates primary qualitative inputs from technical managers, process engineers, and procurement leads with secondary technical literature, licensor disclosures, and non-proprietary operational case studies. Data triangulation ensures that insights reflect both observed plant behavior and vendor-reported performance characteristics, while expert validation sessions reconcile discrepancies and surface practical implementation considerations.

Process-level evaluation relies on catalyst characterization, deactivation profiling, and reactor-regenerator thermodynamics, complemented by operational data such as cycle length distributions and turnaround records where available. Supply-chain analysis combines procurement lead-time studies, sourcing concentration metrics, and tariff impact assessments to capture commercial vulnerabilities. Scenario analysis was used to explore sensitivity to feedstock shifts, tariff regimes, and end-user demand rebalancing, enabling robust recommendations under alternative operating environments.

Throughout the research, emphasis was placed on technical reproducibility and transparency. Assumptions surrounding feedstock properties, catalyst attrition mechanisms, and configuration-specific performance were documented and stress-tested. Where proprietary information was relied upon, findings were corroborated through cross-validation with independent technical experts to preserve objectivity and practical relevance for decision-makers.

Concise synthesis of strategic imperatives emphasizing systems-based catalyst decisions, supply-chain resilience, and digital-enabled operational performance for sustainable competitive advantage

The collective analysis underscores that competitive advantage in fluid catalytic cracking increasingly stems from integrated approaches that combine advanced catalyst chemistries, resilient supply chains, and digital operational excellence. Operators that treat catalyst selection as a systems decision-where binder, filler, matrix choices and zeolite variants are evaluated in concert with configuration, feedstock, and end-user priorities-achieve more predictable outcomes and lower lifecycle costs. Moreover, regional nuances and trade-policy developments mandate flexible strategies that can adapt to shifting feedstock availability and tariff-imposed cost structures.

Companies that invest in outcome-oriented partnerships with technology providers and that harness predictive analytics for maintenance and feedstock optimization are likely to sustain higher on-stream factors and better product yield alignment. Ultimately, the path to value involves balancing short-term operational gains with medium-term investments in sustainability and circularity, thereby preserving license to operate and opening avenues for higher-value petrochemical integration. Decision-makers should therefore prioritize modular upgrades, robust supplier diversification, and targeted pilot programs to validate innovations before broad deployment.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

• 1.1. Objectives of the Study
• 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
• 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
• 1.4. Currency & Pricing
• 1.5. Language
• 1.6. Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Overview

5. Market Insights

• 5.1. Adoption of novel zeolite-based catalysts for maximizing propylene yields in FCC units
• 5.2. Implementation of AI-driven process control systems for real-time FCC reactor optimization
• 5.3. Integration of carbon capture technologies into FCC units to reduce CO2 emissions and footprint
• 5.4. Retrofitting existing FCC units with residue upgrading catalysts to process heavy crude blends
• 5.5. Co-processing of renewable and bio-based feedstocks in FCC to support decarbonization goals
• 5.6. Development of sulfur-scavenging additives to mitigate SOx emissions from FCC regenerator flue gas
• 5.7. Optimization of catalyst circulation rates to enhance conversion efficiency and extend cycle length
• 5.8. Deployment of inline particle size analyzers for monitoring catalyst attrition and activity in FCC units

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Components

• 8.1. Binder
• 8.2. Filler
• 8.3. Matrix
• 8.4. Zeolite Catalyst
  • 8.4.1. Zeolite Y
  • 8.4.2. ZSM-5 Zeolite

9. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Configuration

• 9.1. Side by Side Type
• 9.2. Stacked Type

10. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Feedstock Type

• 10.1. Deasphalted Oil
• 10.2. Residue
• 10.3. Vacuum Gas Oil

11. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Unit Capacity

• 11.1. Large Capacity
• 11.2. Medium Capacity
• 11.3. Small Capacity

12. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by End User

• 12.1. Diesel Production
• 12.2. Gasoline Production
• 12.3. Light Olefins Production
  • 12.3.1. Ethylene
  • 12.3.2. Propylene

13. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Region

• 13.1. Americas
  • 13.1.1. North America
  • 13.1.2. Latin America
• 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
  • 13.2.1. Europe
  • 13.2.2. Middle East
  • 13.2.3. Africa
• 13.3. Asia-Pacific

14. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Group

• 14.1. ASEAN
• 14.2. GCC
• 14.3. European Union
• 14.4. BRICS
• 14.5. G7
• 14.6. NATO

15. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Market, by Country

• 15.1. United States
• 15.2. Canada
• 15.3. Mexico
• 15.4. Brazil
• 15.5. United Kingdom
• 15.6. Germany
• 15.7. France
• 15.8. Russia
• 15.9. Italy
• 15.10. Spain
• 15.11. China
• 15.12. India
• 15.13. Japan
• 15.14. Australia
• 15.15. South Korea

16. Competitive Landscape

• 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
• 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
• 16.3. Competitive Analysis
  • 16.3.1. Axens Joint Stock Company
  • 16.3.2. BASF SE
  • 16.3.3. CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP.
  • 16.3.4. Chevron Lummus Global
  • 16.3.5. DuPont de Nemours, Inc
  • 16.3.6. Emerson Electric Co.
  • 16.3.7. Evonik Industries AG
  • 16.3.8. Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • 16.3.9. Flour Corporation
  • 16.3.10. Honeywell International Inc.
  • 16.3.11. JGC Catalysts and Chemicals Ltd.
  • 16.3.12. Johnson Matthey Group.
  • 16.3.13. Ketjen by Albemarle Corporation
  • 16.3.14. Kuwait Catalyst Company.
  • 16.3.15. Magma Group
  • 16.3.16. N.E. CHEMCAT Corporation
  • 16.3.17. Naugra
  • 16.3.18. Shell PLC
  • 16.3.19. Sulzer Ltd.
  • 16.3.20. W.R. Grace Company
  • 16.3.21. Yueyang sciensun chemical industry co., LTD
  • 16.3.22. Zeopore Technologies NV

LIST OF FIGURES

• FIGURE 1. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 2. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
• FIGURE 3. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 4. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
• FIGURE 5. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 6. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
• FIGURE 7. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 8. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
• FIGURE 9. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 10. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2024 VS 2032 (%)
• FIGURE 11. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 12. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 13. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 14. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 15. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 16. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 17. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 18. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 19. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 20. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 21. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 22. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 23. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 24. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 25. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 26. G7 FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 27. NATO FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 28. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2024 VS 2025 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
• FIGURE 29. FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2024
• FIGURE 30. FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2024

LIST OF TABLES

• TABLE 1. FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SEGMENTATION & COVERAGE
• TABLE 2. UNITED STATES DOLLAR EXCHANGE RATE, 2018-2024
• TABLE 3. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 4. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 5. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 6. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 7. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 8. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 9. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 10. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 11. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 12. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY BINDER, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 13. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 14. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 15. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 16. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 17. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 18. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FILLER, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 19. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 20. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 21. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 22. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 23. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 24. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MATRIX, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 25. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 26. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 27. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 28. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 29. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 30. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 31. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 32. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 33. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 34. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 35. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 36. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 37. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 38. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE Y, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 39. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 40. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 41. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 42. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 43. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 44. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZSM-5 ZEOLITE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 45. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 46. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 47. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 48. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 49. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 50. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 51. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 52. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SIDE BY SIDE TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 53. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 54. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 55. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 56. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 57. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 58. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY STACKED TYPE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 59. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 60. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 61. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 62. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 63. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 64. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 65. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 66. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DEASPHALTED OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 67. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 68. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 69. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 70. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 71. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 72. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY RESIDUE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 73. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 74. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 75. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 76. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 77. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 78. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY VACUUM GAS OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 79. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 80. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 81. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 82. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 83. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 84. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 85. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 86. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 87. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 88. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 89. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 90. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 91. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 92. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 93. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 94. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 95. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 96. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 97. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 98. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL CAPACITY, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 99. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 100. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 101. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 102. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 103. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 104. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 105. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 106. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY DIESEL PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 107. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 108. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 109. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 110. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 111. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 112. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GASOLINE PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 113. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 114. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 115. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 116. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 117. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 118. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 119. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 120. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 121. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 122. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 123. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 124. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 125. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 126. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 127. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 128. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 129. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 130. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 131. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 132. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 133. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 134. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 135. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 136. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 137. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 138. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 139. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 140. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 141. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 142. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 143. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 144. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 145. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 146. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 147. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 148. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 149. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 150. AMERICAS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 151. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 152. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 153. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 154. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 155. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 156. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 157. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 158. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 159. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 160. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 161. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 162. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 163. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 164. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 165. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 166. NORTH AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 167. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 168. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 169. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 170. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 171. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 172. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 173. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 174. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 175. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 176. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 177. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 178. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 179. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 180. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 181. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 182. LATIN AMERICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 183. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 184. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 185. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 186. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 187. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 188. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 189. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 190. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 191. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 192. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 193. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 194. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 195. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 196. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 197. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 198. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 199. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 200. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 201. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 202. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 203. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 204. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 205. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 206. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 207. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 208. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 209. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 210. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 211. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 212. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 213. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 214. EUROPE FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 215. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 216. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 217. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 218. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 219. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 220. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 221. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 222. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 223. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 224. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 225. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 226. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 227. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 228. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 229. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 230. MIDDLE EAST FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 231. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 232. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 233. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 234. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 235. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 236. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 237. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 238. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 239. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 240. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 241. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 242. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 243. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 244. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 245. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 246. AFRICA FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 247. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 248. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 249. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 250. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 251. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 252. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 253. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 254. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 255. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 256. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 257. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 258. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 259. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 260. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 261. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 262. ASIA-PACIFIC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 263. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 264. GLOBAL FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 265. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 266. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 267. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 268. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 269. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 270. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 271. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 272. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 273. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 274. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 275. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 276. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 277. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 278. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 279. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 280. ASEAN FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 281. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 282. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 283. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 284. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 285. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 286. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 287. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 288. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 289. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 290. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 291. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 292. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 293. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 294. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 295. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 296. GCC FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 297. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 298. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 299. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 300. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 301. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 302. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY ZEOLITE CATALYST, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 303. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 304. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY CONFIGURATION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 305. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 306. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY FEEDSTOCK TYPE, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 307. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 308. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY UNIT CAPACITY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 309. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 310. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 311. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 312. EUROPEAN UNION FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT OLEFINS PRODUCTION, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 313. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 314. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025-2032 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 315. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENTS, 2018-2024 (USD MILLION)
• TABLE 316. BRICS FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING MARKET