查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1909194

生物基凝聚剂市场按产品类型、应用、最终用户和分销管道划分－2026-2032年全球预测

Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market by Product Type, Application, End User, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 196 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，生物基凝聚剂市场价值将达到 10.7 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 11.4 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 18.2 亿美元，复合年增长率为 7.82%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 10.7亿美元
预计年份：2026年 11.4亿美元
预测年份 2032 18.2亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 7.82%

本文权威概述了永续性、监管和性能要求如何重塑生物基凝聚剂的优先事项和配方策略。

随着环境、监管和性能方面的要求日益趋同，生物基凝聚剂领域正在经历根本性的变革。凝聚剂在涂料系统中发挥着至关重要的作用，它们能够促进成膜、改善流动性和光滑度，并调控蒸发特性。然而，随着永续性成为配方师和製造商的首要考虑因素，该行业正逐步从传统的溶剂型化学品转向可再生、低毒性的替代品，以维持或提升最终用户的性能。

生物基化学的进步、监管压力和买家偏好如何融合，将加速凝聚剂生态系统的转型？

近年来，技术、法规和市场行为的变革性变化重新调整了整个涂料价值链的优先事项。在技​​术方面，生物基原料转化和绿色溶剂设计的进步使得凝聚剂的开发成为可能，这些絮凝剂在水性和溶剂型系统中均具有相近的蒸发速率、溶解度和相容性，同时也能减少有害成分。同时，毒性筛检和环境归趋分析技术的普及应用，也促进了产品开发的快速改善和风险降低。

近期关税正在重组供应链，鼓励製造业回流，并引导筹资策略朝向更具韧性和本地化的在地采购。

美国的政策和关税措施对凝聚剂生产商和下游混炼企业的原料流动和策略采购决策产生了重大影响。关税不仅影响进口中间体的到岸成本，也奖励将某些生产过程迁回国内、推动垂直整合，并加强供应商与本地生产商之间的合作。因此，筹资策略变得更加多元化，风险意识也更强。

本文从综合细分观点，阐述了产品化学性质、应用需求、终端用户需求和分销管道趋势如何相互作用，从而影响凝聚剂的开发和应用。

了解市场动态需要理解产品、应用、终端用户和分销管道细分如何相互作用，从而影响需求推动要素和创新重点。从产品观点来看，乙二醇醚和丙二醇醚具有不同的性质。乙二醇醚通常具有更强的溶解性，并提供更快的挥发窗口，适用于某些溶剂型系统；而丙二醇醚挥发性较低，通常具有更好的健康和安全特性，与水性涂料和低VOC目标相兼容。这些固有的差异会影响配方师的选择标准以及针对特定最终用途的涂料技术最佳化。

分析区域差异，重点阐述美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太市场在管理体制、供应链和终端用户优先事项方面的差异

区域趋势对生物基凝聚剂产业的技术应用、监管合规性和供应链结构有着深远的影响。在美洲，需求模式反映了先进的工业涂料基础设施和消费者对室内空气品质的高度关注，这两者共同推动了对低毒性、高性能凝聚剂的需求。政策环境和州级措施进一步影响采购惯例和供应商选择，而北美和南美原料生产商的接近性也会影响原物料采购决策。

现有化学品供应商、专业创新企业和合作伙伴关係如何透过永续性、规模和技术差异化创造竞争优势

竞争格局的特点是既有传统化学品製造商，也有特种溶剂製造商，以及新兴的生物基创新企业。传统企业利用其规模、全球供应链网络和深厚的技术专长，维持广泛的产品系列，不断改进产品以降低危害，并确保向大规模配方商持续供应产品。他们通常会投资于中试规模的生物基成分计划和内部测试能力，以检验其性能优于传统化学品。

为製造商和供应商提供实际的策略行动，以检验技术、实现供应链多元化，并透过有针对性的商业化和监管应对措施加速技术普及。

为了充分利用向生物基凝聚剂转型带来的机会，产业领导者应采取协作策略，并专注于技术检验、供应链韧性和市场教育。首先，应投资进行严格的应用测试和毒性筛检，以支持性能和安全性声明。在成膜性、黏附性和耐久性等关键指标上证明其等效性或优越性，将加速专业配方师的接受度；而检验的危害降低，则能引起相关人员和眼光独到的消费者的共鸣。

我们多方面的研究框架结合了专家访谈、监管审查、供应链映射和技术检验，以支持可靠的见解和可操作的结果。

我们的研究途径结合了定性和定量方法，以全面了解产品、应用、终端用户和分销管道的动态。主要研究包括对多个地区的配方科学家、采购经理和分销合作伙伴进行结构化访谈，以获取有关性能要求、采购限制和决策标准的第一手资讯。此外，我们还与化学专家进行了技术访谈，检验基于化学的性能指标和毒性考虑。

一份简洁的综合分析强调了透过检验绩效、稳健采购和有针对性的商业化，将永续性转化为竞争优势的必要性。

向生物基凝聚剂的转型反映了涂料产业更广泛的变革，永续性、安全性和性能正融合成为产品策略的核心决定因素。将技术创新与严格的检验、灵活的采购和清晰的沟通相结合的相关人员，将更有利于掌握监管变化和消费者偏好转变带来的机会。同时，那些延迟投资于替代技术研发和供应链韧性的企业，则可能面临更长的认证週期和更高的转型成本。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 生物基凝聚剂市场（依产品类型划分）

  • 乙二醇醚
  • 丙二醇醚

9. 生物基凝聚剂市场（依应用领域划分）

  • 建筑涂料
    • 溶剂型
    • 水溶液
  • 汽车修理漆
  • 工业涂料
  • 木器漆
    • 户外木漆
    • 室内木漆

第十章 生物基凝聚剂市场（依最终用户划分）

  • DIY
  • 专业的

第十一章 生物基凝聚剂市场（依通路划分）

  • 直销
  • 经销商
  • 线上零售

第十二章 生物基凝聚剂市场（依地区划分）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 生物基凝聚剂市场（依类别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 各国生物基凝聚剂市场概况

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章美国生物基凝聚剂市场

第十六章：中国生物基凝聚剂市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ADDAPT Chemicals BV
  • Arkema Group
  • BASF SE
  • Cargill, Incorporated
  • Celanese Corporation
  • Chemoxy International Limited
  • Croda International Plc
  • Dow Inc.
  • Eastman Chemical Company
  • Elementis Plc
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Hallstar Company
  • Patcham Limited
  • Stepan Company
  • Synthomer Plc
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13920

The Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market was valued at USD 1.07 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.14 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 7.82%, reaching USD 1.82 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 1.07 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 1.14 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 1.82 billion
CAGR (%) 7.82%

An authoritative overview of how sustainability, regulation, and performance demands are reshaping bio-based coalescing agent priorities and formulation strategies

The bio-based coalescing agent landscape is undergoing a fundamental redefinition driven by converging environmental, regulatory, and performance imperatives. Coalescing agents play a critical role in coating systems by enabling film formation, improving flow and leveling, and balancing evaporation profiles; however, as formulators and manufacturers place greater emphasis on sustainability, the industry is shifting from traditional solvent-based chemistries toward renewable, low-toxicity alternatives that preserve or enhance end-use performance.

In practice, this means that researchers, R&D teams, and procurement professionals are evaluating ethylene glycol ethers and propylene glycol ethers not only for their functional properties but also for life-cycle attributes, toxicity profiles, and compatibility with waterborne formulations. The transition is spurred by tighter regulatory scrutiny on volatile organic compounds and worker exposure, as well as by customer demand for greener coatings solutions. Consequently, product development roadmaps increasingly prioritize bio-derived feedstocks, reduced hazard classifications, and improved biodegradability while maintaining critical performance metrics for architectural, industrial, and wood coatings.

Transition pathways are complex and require coordinated action across formulation scientists, raw material suppliers, and distributors. As stakeholders navigate these challenges, understanding the technical trade-offs, supply chain constraints, and end-user expectations becomes essential to making informed decisions that reconcile sustainability targets with operational realities.

How converging advances in bio-feedstock chemistry, regulatory pressure, and buyer preferences are accelerating transformation across the coalescing agent ecosystem

Recent years have seen transformative shifts across technology, regulation, and market behavior that are realigning priorities across the coatings value chain. On the technology front, advances in bio-feedstock conversion and green solvent design are enabling coalescing agents that reduce hazardous constituents while delivering comparable evaporation rates, solvency, and compatibility with both waterborne and solventborne systems. In parallel, analytical techniques for toxicity screening and environmental fate are more accessible, allowing faster iteration and risk mitigation in product development.

Regulatory momentum is reinforcing these technological shifts. Heightened focus on worker safety, indoor air quality, and life-cycle impacts has accelerated restrictions on certain glycol ethers and solvent classes, prompting suppliers to reformulate or withdraw high-risk products. Manufacturers are responding by prioritizing compliance-ready chemistries that facilitate market access in jurisdictions with stringent chemical policies.

Market behavior is evolving as well. End users are increasingly sensitive to product labels and ingredient transparency, and professional applicators are seeking products that balance health considerations with application performance. Distribution ecosystems are adapting, with direct-sales models growing alongside traditional distributor networks and digital channels, enabling more rapid introduction of new bio-based options and direct engagement with buyers. Collectively, these shifts are driving faster cycles of innovation and raising the bar for demonstrable sustainability outcomes.

How recent tariff implementations are reshaping supply chains, prompting reshoring initiatives, and driving procurement strategies toward resilience and local sourcing

Policy actions and tariff measures in the United States have exerted significant influence on raw material flows and strategic sourcing decisions for coalescing agent manufacturers and downstream formulators. Tariffs affect not only the landed cost of imported intermediates but also incentivize reshoring of certain production steps, vertical integration, and closer partnerships between suppliers and regional manufacturers. As a result, procurement strategies are becoming more diversified and risk-aware.

In response, some manufacturers are expanding domestic production capacity or qualifying alternative feedstocks to reduce exposure to tariff-induced volatility. These adjustments can lead to greater supply chain resilience, but they also create transitional costs as contracts are renegotiated and logistics are reconfigured. Furthermore, the tariff landscape catalyzes innovation in product design that prioritizes locally sourced inputs and modular process technologies which are less susceptible to cross-border trade disruption.

At the same time, the tariffs have prompted downstream players, including architectural and industrial coatings producers, to reassess formulation baselines and cost structures. Increased attention to supplier relationships and long-term agreements has emerged as a stabilizing tactic, alongside investments in substitution research to identify bio-based coalescers that can be procured through unaffected channels. These strategic adaptations underscore a broader industry emphasis on balancing cost control, regulatory compliance, and continuity of supply.

An integrated segmentation perspective explaining how product chemistries, application demands, end-user needs, and channel dynamics jointly inform coalescing agent development and adoption

Understanding market dynamics requires an appreciation of how product, application, end-user, and distribution segmentation interact to shape demand drivers and innovation priorities. From a product perspective, ethylene glycol ethers and propylene glycol ethers present distinct property profiles: ethylene variants generally offer stronger solvency and faster evaporation windows suitable for specific solventborne systems, whereas propylene glycol ethers often provide lower volatility and a more favorable health and safety profile that aligns with waterborne formulations and lower-VOC objectives. These intrinsic differences influence formulators' selection criteria and the technical optimization of coatings across end uses.

Application segmentation further clarifies performance expectations and regulatory constraints. Architectural coatings demand coalescing agents that balance appearance, durability, and indoor air quality; within that space, solventborne architectural finishes prioritize rapid film formation where solvent-handling infrastructure exists, while waterborne architectural products emphasize low-odor and low-toxicity solutions compatible with modern building standards. Automotive refinish coatings require rapid film set, excellent flow and leveling, and compatibility with diverse substrate pretreatments, placing high demands on coalescing agent selection. Industrial coatings focus on long-term durability under varying environmental and chemical exposures, while wood coatings distinguish between exterior products that must resist weathering and interior formulations that must meet indoor air quality expectations.

End-user segmentation-DIY versus professional-introduces different tolerance thresholds for application complexity and product labeling. DIY consumers frequently prioritize ease of use, low odor, and clear labeling, which drives demand for waterborne and low-VOC options with simplified application instructions. Professional applicators, in contrast, place a premium on performance consistency, speed of cure, and compatibility with established processes, often accepting trade-offs that favor productivity and durability.

Distribution channel segmentation also shapes market access and adoption timing. Direct sales enable closer collaboration between suppliers and large formulators, facilitating custom development and volume contracting. Distributors expand reach to small and medium formulators and regional coaters, providing logistical support and technical advisory services. Online retail opens new avenues for DIY-targeted formulations and small-batch specialty products, accelerating market feedback loops and enabling rapid testing of novel bio-based coalescing agent claims. Together, these segmentation lenses provide an integrated framework for anticipating product development trajectories and commercial strategies.

A nuanced regional analysis highlighting how regulatory regimes, supply chains, and end-user priorities differ across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific markets

Regional dynamics exert a profound influence on technology adoption, regulatory compliance, and supply chain configuration across the bio-based coalescing agent landscape. In the Americas, demand patterns reflect a strong mix of advanced industrial coatings infrastructure and consumer sensitivity to indoor air quality, which together drive interest in low-toxicity, high-performance coalescers. Policy environments and state-level initiatives further shape procurement practices and supplier selection, and proximity to feedstock producers in North and South America can influence raw material sourcing decisions.

Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a complex regulatory mosaic with some of the most rigorous chemical management regimes globally. Compliance requirements and sustainability mandates encourage rapid adoption of bio-derived chemistries and comprehensive hazard assessments, and there is a pronounced emphasis on circularity and reporting transparency. Market fragmentation across the region requires nuanced go-to-market strategies that account for varying application preferences and distribution networks.

The Asia-Pacific region combines large-scale production capacity with rapidly evolving demand, particularly in construction and industrial sectors. Growth in urbanization and infrastructure projects sustains robust consumption of architectural and industrial coatings, while regulatory frameworks in various economies are increasingly prioritizing emissions reductions and worker safety. Local manufacturing ecosystems and proximity to feedstock suppliers influence competitive dynamics, and the region is a hotspot for formulation innovation and cost-driven product differentiation.

Across these regions, supply chain topology, regulatory priorities, and end-user expectations interact to form distinct market archetypes. For stakeholders, this means that product positioning, compliance strategies, and partnership choices must be tailored to regional realities to achieve effective market penetration and operational resilience.

How incumbent chemical suppliers, specialty innovators, and collaborative partnerships are shaping competitive differentiation through sustainability, scale, and technical differentiation

The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established chemical manufacturers, specialty solvent producers, and emerging bio-based innovators. Established players leverage scale, global supply networks, and deep technical expertise to maintain broad product portfolios, drive incremental improvements in hazard reduction, and ensure continuity of supply for large formulators. They often invest in pilot-scale bio-feedstock projects and in-house testing capabilities to validate performance against legacy chemistries.

Specialty producers and startups, on the other hand, focus on differentiated value propositions such as novel green chemistries, lower toxicity profiles, and rapid time-to-market for niche applications. These companies frequently pursue strategic partnerships with coatings formulators to co-develop application-specific solutions and to accelerate adoption through targeted field trials. Collaboration with contract manufacturers and toll processors is also common as a means of scaling production without large capital outlays.

Across the spectrum, leading companies are increasingly emphasizing transparency, certification, and evidence-based claims. They invest in third-party testing, publish material safety and environmental data, and engage in joint development agreements with downstream customers. Intellectual property around specific bio-conversion processes, solvent blends, and formulation compatibilizers represents key competitive differentiation, and companies that combine robust R&D pipelines with flexible manufacturing and responsive distribution channels tend to achieve greater traction in the market.

Practical strategic actions for manufacturers and suppliers to validate technology, diversify supply chains, and accelerate adoption through targeted commercialization and regulatory engagement

To capitalize on the transition toward bio-based coalescing agents, industry leaders should pursue a coordinated strategy that emphasizes technology validation, supply chain resilience, and market education. First, invest in rigorous application testing and toxicological screening to substantiate performance and safety claims. Demonstrated equivalence or superiority in key metrics such as film formation, adhesion, and durability will accelerate acceptance among professional formulators, while validated reductions in hazard profiles will resonate with regulatory stakeholders and discerning consumers.

Second, diversify sourcing and consider nearshoring or multi-source contracts to reduce exposure to trade disruptions and tariff volatility. Building strategic partnerships with regional feedstock producers and leveraging toll manufacturing can provide flexibility without excessive capital commitment. Third, prioritize transparency and documentation: publish detailed technical dossiers, environmental fate studies, and guidance for formulators to shorten qualification cycles.

Fourth, tailor go-to-market approaches by customer segment. For DIY channels, emphasize ease of use, odor reduction, and clear labeling through e-commerce platforms and retail partnerships. For professional and industrial accounts, offer technical support, formulation services, and volume-based agreements that reduce adoption friction. Fifth, engage proactively with regulators and standards bodies to shape pragmatic compliance frameworks and to gain early insight into evolving requirements. Collectively, these actions will enable organizations to convert sustainability intent into commercially viable product portfolios and resilient operations.

A multi-method research framework combining expert interviews, regulatory review, supply chain mapping, and technical validation to underpin robust insights and actionable findings

The research approach combined qualitative and quantitative techniques to deliver a holistic understanding of product, application, end-user, and channel dynamics. Primary research involved structured interviews with formulation scientists, procurement leaders, and distribution partners across multiple regions to capture first-hand perspectives on performance requirements, sourcing constraints, and decision criteria. These conversations were supplemented with technical interviews with subject-matter experts to validate chemistry-specific performance metrics and toxicity considerations.

Secondary research encompassed a thorough review of regulatory documentation, patent literature, technical bulletins, and publicly available environmental and safety data sheets to triangulate product claims and identify shifts in compliance expectations. Supply chain analysis mapped typical raw material flows, logistics considerations, and potential points of friction, while case study analysis examined recent reformulation efforts and successful market introductions to identify replicable best practices.

Data validation relied on cross-referencing multiple independent sources, reconciling discrepancies through follow-up expert consultation, and performing sensitivity checks on qualitative interpretations. Segmentation mapping ensured that product performance attributes were linked to specific application needs, end-user tolerances, and distribution channel requirements. Throughout, the methodology prioritized transparency and traceability so that conclusions are grounded in verifiable evidence and practitioner insight.

A concise synthesis underscoring the imperative for validated performance, resilient sourcing, and targeted commercialization to convert sustainability into competitive advantage

The shift toward bio-based coalescing agents reflects a broader evolution in the coatings industry where sustainability, safety, and performance converge as core determinants of product strategy. Stakeholders who align technical innovation with rigorous validation, adaptable sourcing, and clear communication will be best positioned to capture the opportunities created by changing regulation and buyer preferences. At the same time, those who delay investments in substitution research and supply chain resilience risk facing longer qualification cycles and higher transition costs.

Strategic differentiation will come from the ability to demonstrate measurable reductions in hazard profile without sacrificing key application performance metrics, and from the agility to tailor solutions across architectural, automotive, industrial, and wood coating segments. Success will also depend on channel strategy: brands that effectively match product attributes to end-user expectations and distribution mechanics will accelerate adoption and build durable market advantage.

In summary, the road ahead requires a balanced approach that integrates scientific rigor, commercial pragmatism, and proactive regulatory engagement. Organizations that adopt this perspective can transform sustainability imperatives into competitive strengths and drive the next generation of high-performance, lower-risk coating solutions.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Ethylene Glycol Ethers
  • 8.2. Propylene Glycol Ethers

9. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Application

  • 9.1. Architectural Coatings
    • 9.1.1. Solventborne
    • 9.1.2. Waterborne
  • 9.2. Automotive Refinish Coatings
  • 9.3. Industrial Coatings
  • 9.4. Wood Coatings
    • 9.4.1. Exterior Wood Coatings
    • 9.4.2. Interior Wood Coatings

10. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by End User

  • 10.1. DIY
  • 10.2. Professional

11. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 11.1. Direct Sales
  • 11.2. Distributors
  • 11.3. Online Retail

12. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market

16. China Bio-based Coalescing Agent Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ADDAPT Chemicals B.V.
  • 17.6. Arkema Group
  • 17.7. BASF SE
  • 17.8. Cargill, Incorporated
  • 17.9. Celanese Corporation
  • 17.10. Chemoxy International Limited
  • 17.11. Croda International Plc
  • 17.12. Dow Inc.
  • 17.13. Eastman Chemical Company
  • 17.14. Elementis Plc
  • 17.15. Evonik Industries AG
  • 17.16. Hallstar Company
  • 17.17. Patcham Limited
  • 17.18. Stepan Company
  • 17.19. Synthomer Plc

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROPYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENTBORNE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENTBORNE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SOLVENTBORNE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WATERBORNE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WATERBORNE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WATERBORNE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE REFINISH COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY EXTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY EXTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY EXTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY INTERIOR WOOD COATINGS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PROFESSIONAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DIRECT SALES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. AMERICAS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. AFRICA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. ASEAN BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. GCC BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. BRICS BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. G7 BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. NATO BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. GLOBAL BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY WOOD COATINGS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. CHINA BIO-BASED COALESCING AGENT MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)