查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1912576

石油和天然气MIC检测市场：按检测类型、设备、服务模式、材质、应用和最终用户划分 - 全球预测（2026-2032年）

Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market by Test Type, Equipment, Service Model, Material, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 190 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，石油和天然气 MIC 测试市场价值将达到 14 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长到 14.8 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 20.9 亿美元，复合年增长率为 5.85%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 14亿美元
预计年份：2026年 14.8亿美元
预测年份 2032 20.9亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 5.85%

针对微生物腐蚀检测的策略方法，应使实验室检测结果与实际资产完整性优先事项和组织决策保持一致。

微生物腐蚀 (MIC) 对石油和天然气价值链的运作和经济构成持续挑战，需要严格的测试方法和多学科协作。本文将 MIC 测试视为不仅仅是实验室操作，而是资产完整性计划、合规活动和生命週期风险管理的重要组成部分。透过将测试融入更广泛的检验、维护和可靠性策略中，测试结果可以为相关人员提供更具可操作性的见解，使他们能够优先考虑在安全性、运作和总体拥有成本之间取得平衡的干预措施。

即时监测、多学科整合和标准化调查方法如何从根本上改变金属氧化物半导体（MIC）检测实践和商业服务模式

石油和天然气产业的微生物腐蚀检测正经历变革性的转变，营运商、服务供应商和监管机构应对腐蚀风险的方式也随之改变。首先，对即时和近即时资讯的需求日益增长，从而能够采取预防性干预措施，这推动了感测器技术和远端监控平台的应用，这些技术和平台能够向营运中心提供腐蚀的上下文讯号。因此，检测策略正朝着连续监控模式发展，该模式将电化学和超音波指标与环境和运行元元资料相结合。

评估2025年关税调整对石油和天然气业务组合中采购、供应商选择和MIC测试活动的持续性所产生的策略影响

美国预计2025年实施的贸易政策调整和关税措施，对于与微生物腐蚀（MIC）测试设备和耗材相关的供应链而言，将是重要的考量。关税结构的变化将影响供应商的选择、筹资策略以及仪器和测试用品的总到岸成本。对于依赖进口腐蚀探针、感测器和专用实验室试剂的机构而言，进口关税的提高将促使其评估国内供应商、实现供应链本地化或调整交货週期，以降低成本波动。

详细的细分市场分析揭示了最终用户、应用、测试方法、设备类型、服务交付模式和材料选择如何驱动差异化的MIC测试需求。

细分市场分析揭示了MIC测试的不同面向如何影响营运选择和供应商定位。根据最终用户，市场分为下游、中游和上游三个部分进行分析，每个细分市场都呈现出独特的检测方案和暴露情况，这会影响测试频率、样品获取的复杂性以及所需的分析深度。下游产业通常优先考虑局部腐蚀和储存槽完整性，而中游产业则专注于长距离管道监测和流动保障。同时，上游设施需要强大的测试解决方案来应对难以接近的海底结构和平台组件。

在全球范围内，监管、资产劣化和营运环境等方面的区域差异如何影响MIC测试重点和供应商合作策略

区域趋势影响着对微生物腐蚀检测的需求和服务提供。在美洲，日益严格的监管、老化的基础设施以及庞大的管道网络，促使人们更加重视对监测系统维修，并提升实验室能力，以应对长期存在的腐蚀问题。投资重点往往在于长期健康管理计划，以及将检测结果与数位化资产管理平台整合，从而优化维护週期。

竞争格局评估重点阐述了仪器创新、实验室专业知识和综合服务如何重塑MIC检测领域供应商的价值提案。

MIC测试领域主要企业的分析揭示了一个竞争格局，其中计量设备製造商、专业实验室和综合服务供应商各自提供差异化的价值提案。测量设备製造商正越来越多地将诊断功能和连接性整合到其产品中，以实现远端监控并提供可用于分析的资料集。这些功能对希望减少人工采样并加快决策週期的操作人员极具吸引力。

为营运商提供切实可行的分步建议，帮助他们将MIC测试与基于风险的维护、资料互通性和弹性供应商策略相结合，从而提高资产可靠性。

行业领导者可以透过采取切实可行的优先事项来增强韧性并提升营运绩效。首先，将测试策略与基于风险的资产管理计划相结合，使采样频率和测试选择能够直接反映故障的影响和机率，从而将资源集中用于影响最大的漏洞。其次，投资于可互通的技术和数据标准，将电化学、分子和超音波输出与资产遥测数据整合，从而创建丰富的诊断讯息，支持更快、更准确的干预措施。

一种透明且可重复的调查方法，整合了文献综述、专家访谈以及对MIC测试方法和实施环境的技术评估。

本分析的研究途径结合了文献回顾、一手访谈和技术方法评估，以确保严谨性和观点。二手资料包括同行评审文献、行业白皮书、监管指南和製造商技术规范，旨在建立对现有测试方法和测量设备性能的基础理解。这些资料被整合起来，用于识别调查方法的普遍趋势、优点和缺点，以及不同应用和地区之间的实际差异。

摘要证实，综合性的多学科微生物污染检测是石油和天然气产业资产完整性、风险降低和业务永续营运的策略驱动因素。

报告总结指出，微生物腐蚀检测正从一项独立的实验室活动发展成为一门综合性的、以营运为中心的学科，为石油和天然气行业的资产完整性策略提供支援。感测器技术的进步、分子生物学技术的日益普及以及向连续监测的转变，正在改变企业检测和应对腐蚀风险的方式。这些进步使得企业能够更早发现腐蚀风险，更准确地识别根本原因，并制定更有针对性的缓解策略，从而保护资产价值和营运连续性。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 按测试类型分類的油气产业MIC测试市场

  • 电化学测试
    • 电化学电阻谱
    • 线性极化电阻测试
    • 电位动力学极化法
  • 分子生物学检测
  • 超音波检测
  • 目视检查

9. 石油和天然气产业MIC检测设备市场

  • 腐蚀试验试样
  • 腐蚀探针
  • 感应器
    • 电化学感测器
    • 超音波感测器

10. 依服务模式分類的油气产业MIC检测市场

  • 内部
  • 外包

11. 按材料分類的油气产业MIC检测市场

  • 碳钢
  • 铜合金
  • 不銹钢

12. 按应用领域分類的油气产业MIC检测市场

  • 管道
  • 平台部件
  • 加工设备
  • 储存槽

13. 按最终用户分類的油气产业MIC检测市场

  • 下游产业
  • 中产阶级
  • 上游部门

14. 各地区油气产业MIC检测市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

15. 石油和天然气产业MIC检测市场（按组别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

16. 各国石油与天然气MIC检测市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十七章美国油气产业MIC检测市场

18. 中国油气产业MIC检测市场

第十九章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ALS Limited
  • Applus+Laboratories SL
  • Bureau Veritas SA
  • DEKRA SE
  • Element Materials Technology Inc.
  • Eurofins Scientific SE
  • Intertek Group plc
  • MISTRAS Group, Inc.
  • PerkinElmer, Inc.
  • SGS SA
  • TUV SUD AG
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13A37

The Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market was valued at USD 1.40 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 1.48 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.85%, reaching USD 2.09 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 1.40 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 1.48 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 2.09 billion
CAGR (%) 5.85%

A strategic orientation to microbiologically influenced corrosion testing that aligns laboratory findings with practical asset integrity priorities and organizational decision-making

Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) poses continuing operational and economic challenges across oil and gas value chains, demanding rigorous testing approaches and cross-disciplinary coordination. This introduction frames MIC testing not simply as a laboratory task but as an integral component of asset integrity programs, regulatory compliance efforts, and lifecycle risk management. By situating testing within broader inspection, maintenance, and reliability strategies, stakeholders can derive more actionable intelligence from test outcomes and prioritize interventions that balance safety, uptime, and total cost of ownership.

The evolution of MIC testing reflects both technological advances and shifts in operational expectations. Laboratory and field assays increasingly need to deliver faster turnaround, higher fidelity, and clearer linkage to engineering decisions. Consequently, organizations are revisiting resourcing models, investing in sensor networks and in-line monitoring, and strengthening collaboration between corrosion engineers, microbiologists, and operations teams. These trends underscore the need for robust governance around sampling protocols, test selection, and interpretation of results to ensure that testing informs rather than complicates maintenance planning.

Throughout this report, emphasis is placed on translating test data into prioritized actions. The introduction clarifies terminology, defines common testing modalities, and sets expectations for how various stakeholders-from operations managers to technical procurement-can use testing outputs to make evidence-based choices that mitigate operational risks while supporting regulatory and commercial objectives.

How real-time monitoring, multidisciplinary integration, and standardized methodologies are fundamentally altering MIC testing practices and commercial service models

MIC testing in oil and gas is being reshaped by several transformative shifts that are altering how operators, service providers, and regulators approach corrosion risk. First, there is an increasing premium on real-time and near-real-time intelligence that enables proactive interventions; this is driving uptake of sensor technologies and remote monitoring platforms that can deliver contextualized corrosion signals to operations centers. As a result, testing strategies are moving from episodic sampling toward continuous surveillance models that integrate electrochemical and ultrasonic indicators with environmental and operational metadata.

Second, multidisciplinary integration is becoming the norm. Corrosion specialists now routinely collaborate with microbiologists, data scientists, and reliability engineers to interpret complex test results, and this cross-functional approach improves root-cause analysis and response prioritization. Third, methodological rigor and standardization are gaining traction as regulators and investors demand defensible evidence for degradation assessments. This has accelerated adoption of validated electrochemical techniques, molecular biological assays, and harmonized inspection protocols.

Finally, commercial and service models are adapting: manufacturers are enhancing instrumentation with analytics-ready outputs, while third-party laboratories and service providers are bundling testing with advisory services. These shifts collectively increase the strategic value of MIC testing by converting raw measurements into operationally relevant insight that supports safer, more reliable asset management.

Assessing the strategic ripple effects of 2025 tariff revisions on procurement, supplier selection, and continuity of MIC testing operations across oil and gas portfolios

Anticipated trade policy adjustments and tariff measures enacted by the United States in 2025 present a material consideration for supply chains linked to MIC testing equipment and consumables. Changes in tariff structures influence vendor selection, sourcing strategies, and total landed cost for instrumentation and testing supplies. For organizations that depend on imported corrosion probes, sensors, and specialized laboratory reagents, higher import duties increase the incentive to evaluate domestic suppliers, localize supply chains, or restructure procurement windows to mitigate cost volatility.

These dynamics will likely prompt a re-examination of capital procurement plans and maintenance budgets, as decision-makers weigh the trade-off between cost and performance when choosing between imported and local alternatives. In parallel, service providers that rely on cross-border logistics may adapt by revising contractual terms or increasing inventory buffers to ensure uninterrupted testing services. Importantly, tariff-driven cost pressures can accelerate innovation where manufacturers seek to redesign products to reduce exposure to affected tariff categories or to increase the share of locally sourced components.

From a strategic perspective, the cumulative effect of tariff changes underscores the importance of flexible supplier relationships, diversified procurement channels, and scenario planning. Organizations that proactively model supply disruptions and incremental cost impacts will be better positioned to maintain testing cadence and operational integrity while preserving capital for higher-priority interventions.

In-depth segmentation analysis revealing how end users, applications, test modalities, equipment types, service delivery models, and material choices drive differentiated MIC testing requirements

Segment-level analysis sheds light on how different facets of MIC testing influence operational choices and supplier positioning. Based on End User, market is studied across Downstream, Midstream, and Upstream, and each segment presents distinct inspection regimes and exposure profiles that influence test frequency, sample access complexity, and required analytical depth. Downstream operations typically prioritize localized corrosion and storage tank integrity, while Midstream emphasizes long-distance pipeline surveillance and flow assurance concerns; Upstream installations contend with inaccessible subsea structures and platform components that demand ruggedized testing solutions.

Based on Application, market is studied across Pipelines, Platform Components, Processing Equipment, and Storage Tanks, and these applications require tailored protocols for sampling, test types, and sensor deployment. For example, pipelines necessitate inline monitoring compatibility and rapid-response diagnostics, whereas processing equipment may need high-resolution laboratory assays tied to chemical treatment programs. Based on Test Type, market is studied across Electrochemical Testing, Molecular Biological Testing, Ultrasonic Testing, and Visual Inspection. The Electrochemical Testing is further studied across Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, Linear Polarization Resistance, and Potentiodynamic Polarization, and each sub-method delivers different insights about corrosion kinetics, active corrosion rates, and protective film behavior.

Based on Equipment, market is studied across Corrosion Coupons, Corrosion Probes, and Sensors. The Sensors is further studied across Electrochemical Sensors and Ultrasonic Sensors, and these devices vary by robustness, data fidelity, and deployment modality. Based on Service Model, market is studied across In-House and Third Party Outsourced, influencing how organizations allocate technical capability and manage confidentiality, turnaround, and cost. Based on Material, market is studied across Carbon Steel, Copper Alloy, and Stainless Steel, with material selection driving failure modes and therefore the preferred testing and inspection pathways.

How geographic variation in regulation, asset vintage, and operational environments shapes MIC testing priorities and vendor engagement strategies across global regions

Regional dynamics shape both demand for MIC testing and the configuration of service offerings. In the Americas, regulatory scrutiny, aging infrastructure, and expansive pipeline networks drive a focus on retrofitting monitoring systems and upgrading laboratory capabilities to address legacy corrosion challenges. Investment priorities often emphasize long-term integrity programs and integrating test outputs with digital asset management platforms to optimize maintenance cycles.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, diverse regulatory regimes and a wide range of asset vintages create a mosaic of testing needs. European operators frequently converge on harmonized standards and high analytical rigor, while Middle Eastern producers balance throughput demands with corrosion management for high-temperature, high-chloride environments. African operations often contend with logistical constraints and require solutions that prioritize robustness and simplicity. Across this region, there is a growing appetite for molecular biological testing tied to enhanced environmental monitoring and lifecycle management.

In Asia-Pacific, rapid infrastructure expansion and increased offshore development push operators toward scalable testing solutions that accommodate both new builds and legacy assets. Supply chain considerations and local manufacturing capabilities influence equipment availability, while regional innovation hubs are advancing sensor technologies and automated inspection approaches. Taken together, regional distinctions necessitate adaptive strategies for testing program design, vendor engagement, and capability development to ensure relevance to local operating conditions.

Competitive landscape assessment highlighting how instrument innovation, laboratory specialization, and integrated service offerings are reshaping supplier value propositions in MIC testing

A review of key companies active in MIC testing reveals a competitive landscape where instrumentation makers, specialized laboratories, and integrated service providers each stake out differentiated value propositions. Instrument manufacturers are increasingly embedding diagnostics and connectivity into their products to facilitate remote monitoring and to deliver analytics-ready datasets. These capabilities are attractive to operators seeking to reduce manual sampling and accelerate decision cycles.

Specialized laboratories and molecular diagnostic providers continue to refine assay sensitivity and interpretive frameworks, enabling more precise attribution of biological contributors to corrosion. Meanwhile, integrated service companies package testing with advisory and remedial services, offering turnkey solutions that translate test results into prioritized maintenance actions. Strategic partnerships between equipment manufacturers and service providers are extending the reach of both parties by coupling hardware with field services and data interpretation expertise.

Across the competitive set, differentiation is achieved through demonstrable test reproducibility, rapid turnaround, breadth of method portfolio, and the ability to scale services across multiple asset classes. For buyers, vendor selection increasingly hinges on the clarity of reporting, data interoperability with existing systems, and the provider's ability to support regulatory compliance and operational outcomes rather than on equipment price alone.

Practical, phased recommendations for operators to integrate MIC testing into risk-based maintenance, data interoperability, and resilient supplier strategies to improve asset reliability

Industry leaders can strengthen resilience and operational outcomes by pursuing a set of actionable priorities. First, align testing strategies with risk-based asset management plans so that sampling cadence and test selection directly reflect failure consequence and likelihood; this ensures resources focus on highest-impact vulnerabilities. Second, invest in interoperable technologies and data standards that enable electrochemical, molecular, and ultrasonic outputs to be combined with asset telemetry, creating richer diagnostic context that supports faster and more accurate interventions.

Third, cultivate a balanced supplier ecosystem by qualifying multiple vendors for critical instrumentation and consumables while exploring local sourcing options to mitigate tariff and logistics exposure. Fourth, expand in-house competence in test interpretation while retaining access to third-party specialist labs for complex assays; this hybrid model supports operational agility without sacrificing analytic depth. Fifth, prioritize pilot projects that integrate new sensor types or testing protocols with defined performance metrics, allowing organizations to validate cost-effectiveness before scaling.

Taken together, these recommendations emphasize practical, phased investments that reduce failure risk, improve maintenance prioritization, and preserve capital flexibility. By translating testing insights into explicit operational actions, industry leaders can convert diagnostic capability into measurable reliability gains.

Transparent and reproducible research methodology integrating literature synthesis, expert interviews, and technical appraisal of MIC testing modalities and deployment contexts

The research approach underpinning this analysis combined document review, primary interviews, and technical method appraisal to ensure a rigorous and actionable perspective. Secondary sources included peer-reviewed literature, industry white papers, regulatory guidance, and manufacturer technical specifications to establish a baseline understanding of established testing methodologies and instrumentation capabilities. These materials were synthesized to identify prevailing trends, methodological strengths and weaknesses, and areas of practical divergence across applications and regions.

Primary research incorporated structured interviews with corrosion engineers, laboratory managers, and service providers to capture operational realities, decision criteria, and emerging innovation pathways. Interview findings were triangulated with documented technical standards and instrument performance data to validate claims and to refine interpretations. Methodological appraisal focused on electrochemical, molecular biological, ultrasonic, and visual inspection techniques, assessing each for accuracy, operational fit, and typical deployment scenarios.

Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on transparency of assumptions, reproducibility of methods, and the practical applicability of findings. The combination of primary and secondary inputs supports a balanced view that is grounded in operational experience while attentive to evolving technological and regulatory factors.

Concluding synthesis affirming that integrated, multidisciplinary MIC testing is a strategic enabler for asset integrity, risk reduction, and operational continuity in oil and gas

This report concludes that microbiologically influenced corrosion testing is evolving from discrete laboratory activities into an integrated, operationally focused discipline that underpins asset integrity strategies across oil and gas. Advances in sensor technology, increased adoption of molecular biological methods, and a shift toward continuous monitoring are changing how organizations detect and respond to corrosion risk. These evolutions enable earlier detection, more accurate attribution of root causes, and more targeted mitigation strategies that preserve asset value and operational continuity.

However, realizing these benefits depends on deliberate organizational decisions around governance, capability building, and supplier engagement. Standardized protocols, investment in data interoperability, and the development of in-house analytical expertise are critical enablers. Likewise, adapting procurement practices and supply chain configurations to account for shifting tariff and logistics dynamics will be essential for maintaining testing continuity and cost efficiency.

In sum, MIC testing will continue to be a strategic lever for operators that integrate it with risk-based planning and digital asset management. Organizations that adopt a disciplined, multidisciplinary approach to testing will gain clearer visibility into corrosion drivers and greater confidence in the interventions they select to protect people, the environment, and asset performance.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Test Type

  • 8.1. Electrochemical Testing
    • 8.1.1. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
    • 8.1.2. Linear Polarization Resistance
    • 8.1.3. Potentiodynamic Polarization
  • 8.2. Molecular Biological Testing
  • 8.3. Ultrasonic Testing
  • 8.4. Visual Inspection

9. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Equipment

  • 9.1. Corrosion Coupons
  • 9.2. Corrosion Probes
  • 9.3. Sensors
    • 9.3.1. Electrochemical Sensors
    • 9.3.2. Ultrasonic Sensors

10. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Service Model

  • 10.1. In-House
  • 10.2. Third Party Outsourced

11. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Material

  • 11.1. Carbon Steel
  • 11.2. Copper Alloy
  • 11.3. Stainless Steel

12. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Pipelines
  • 12.2. Platform Components
  • 12.3. Processing Equipment
  • 12.4. Storage Tanks

13. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Downstream
  • 13.2. Midstream
  • 13.3. Upstream

14. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market

18. China Oil & Gas MIC Testing Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. ALS Limited
  • 19.6. Applus+ Laboratories S.L.
  • 19.7. Bureau Veritas S.A.
  • 19.8. DEKRA SE
  • 19.9. Element Materials Technology Inc.
  • 19.10. Eurofins Scientific SE
  • 19.11. Intertek Group plc
  • 19.12. MISTRAS Group, Inc.
  • 19.13. PerkinElmer, Inc.
  • 19.14. SGS SA
  • 19.15. TUV SUD AG

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL IMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY LINEAR POLARIZATION RESISTANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY LINEAR POLARIZATION RESISTANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY LINEAR POLARIZATION RESISTANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY POTENTIODYNAMIC POLARIZATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY POTENTIODYNAMIC POLARIZATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY POTENTIODYNAMIC POLARIZATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TESTING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TESTING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MOLECULAR BIOLOGICAL TESTING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ULTRASONIC TESTING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ULTRASONIC TESTING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ULTRASONIC TESTING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY VISUAL INSPECTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY VISUAL INSPECTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY VISUAL INSPECTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CORROSION COUPONS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CORROSION COUPONS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CORROSION COUPONS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CORROSION PROBES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CORROSION PROBES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CORROSION PROBES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ULTRASONIC SENSORS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ULTRASONIC SENSORS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ULTRASONIC SENSORS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY IN-HOUSE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY IN-HOUSE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY IN-HOUSE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY THIRD PARTY OUTSOURCED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY THIRD PARTY OUTSOURCED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY THIRD PARTY OUTSOURCED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY CARBON STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COPPER ALLOY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COPPER ALLOY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COPPER ALLOY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STAINLESS STEEL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PIPELINES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PIPELINES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PIPELINES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM COMPONENTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM COMPONENTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PLATFORM COMPONENTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY PROCESSING EQUIPMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE TANKS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE TANKS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY STORAGE TANKS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY DOWNSTREAM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY DOWNSTREAM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY DOWNSTREAM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MIDSTREAM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MIDSTREAM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MIDSTREAM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY UPSTREAM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY UPSTREAM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY UPSTREAM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. AMERICAS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. NORTH AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. LATIN AMERICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. EUROPE OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. MIDDLE EAST OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. AFRICA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. ASIA-PACIFIC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. ASEAN OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. GCC OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. EUROPEAN UNION OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. BRICS OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 200. G7 OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 201. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 202. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 203. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 204. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 205. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 206. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 207. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 208. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 209. NATO OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 210. GLOBAL OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 211. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 212. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 213. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 214. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 215. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 216. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 217. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 218. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 219. UNITED STATES OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 220. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 221. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY TEST TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 222. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY ELECTROCHEMICAL TESTING, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 223. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY EQUIPMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 224. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SENSORS, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 225. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY SERVICE MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 226. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 227. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 228. CHINA OIL & GAS MIC TESTING MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)