查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1914450

零信任身分管理平台市场按组件、部署模式和垂直行业划分 - 全球预测 2026-2032

Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market by Component, Deployment Model, Vertical - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 195 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，零信任身分管理平台市场价值将达到 352.3 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 401.1 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 903.8 亿美元，年复合成长率为 14.40%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 352.3亿美元
预计年份：2026年 401.1亿美元
预测年份 2032 903.8亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 14.40%

一个权威的身份框架，作为战略控制平面，在现代混合云原生环境中平衡网路风险缓解和业务赋能。

本执行摘要概述了零信任模式下身分管理的策略轮廓，并重点阐述了身分为何是现代网路防御的基础控製手段。各组织机构日益意识到，基于边界的防御不足以应对高阶威胁行为者和复杂的混合IT环境。因此，涵盖客户身分、员工存取、多因素身分验证和特权存取等以身分为中心的控制措施已成为安全和业务赋能的核心。

云端原生架构、不断演变的威胁模式和监管要求如何推动身分和存取管理向可配置、注重隐私的方向转型

随着技术、营运和监管要求的融合，身分和存取管理领域正经历着变革性的转变。云端原生应用架构和 API 的激增正在侵蚀传统的网路边界，并要求身分控制能够跟随工作负载和使用者在不同环境之间的迁移而运作。同时，服务网格、容器编排管理和无伺服器运算的普及也要求身分解决方案能够原生整合到 CI/CD 管线和执行时间平台中。

评估关税波动和贸易政策变化对身分平台采购、架构和部署策略的营运和采购影响

关税政策的变化与技术供应链之间的相互作用会对筹资策略和部署计划产生重大影响，尤其对于那些采购结构地域分散且软硬体一体化的组织而言更是如此。关税波动可能会改变企业对本地部署设备、硬体安全模组或包含专用认证设备的捆绑系统的采购选择。因此，采购团队正在重新评估整体拥有成本，以应对潜在的贸易相关关税、物流复杂性和供应商多元化等因素，从而降低供应链风险。

策略性细分洞察将元件功能、部署模式、组织规模和特定产业需求与实际的身分架构和采购方案相匹配。

关键细分洞察揭示了技术选择、采购标准和实施策略在组件、部署模型、组织规模和产业维度上的差异。考虑到整体情况元件（客户身分存取管理、身分存取管理、多因素身分验证、特权存取管理），每个类别都针对独特的风险因素和使用者体验目标。 CIAM 投资优先考虑外部使用者的可扩展身分验证和授权管理，IAM 专注于员工生命週期和目录集成，MFA 为交易和会话提供自适应保障，而 PAM 则保护高风险系统中的管理凭证和会话活动。

区域因素和实施细节会影响美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的供应商选择、资料驻留决策和身分计画管治。

区域特征塑造了技术采纳模式、监管压力和打入市场策略，并对策略和执行产生重大影响。在美洲，企业通常优先考虑快速采用云端运算、高度重视数位化客户体验以及诈欺侦测方面的创新，同时法规结构鼓励采取强有力的资料保护和事件揭露措施。在欧洲、中东和非洲地区，监管的复杂性和跨境资料保护机制要求企业认真考虑资料驻留和同意管理。此外，许多公共部门专案优先考虑公民服务的互通性和身分保证。

企业平台、云端原生新兴参与企业、专业身分验证供应商和整合商的组合将影响身分认证专案的供应商选择和长期整合风险。

身分管理领域的竞争格局由成熟的企业平台、云端原生新兴企业、专业身分验证供应商以及将产品功能转化为实际营运方案的系统整合商共同构成。成熟的平台通常提供涵盖员工身分和存取管理 (IAM)、多因素身分验证 (MFA) 以及特权存取控制等广泛功能，对寻求统一管治、完善整​​合生态系统和成熟支援的组织而言，仍然极具吸引力。云端原生供应商则透过 API 优先架构、快速功能交付以及与主流公共云端供应商的原生集成，为奉行云优先策略的组织带来敏捷性，简化了部署流程。

为领导者提供具体的策略和采购建议，以透过分阶段采用、互通标准和管治治理来实现身分管理的现代化。

产业领导者应采取分阶段、有计画的身份现代化方法，在快速取得成效的同时，建构稳固的基础架构。首先，明确定义具体的用例和预期业务成果，以便儘早展现价值，例如减少特权帐户的蔓延、消除高风险的共用凭证以及简化消费者註册流程。然后，将这些成果与可衡量的关键绩效指标 (KPI) 和管治查核点挂钩。优先考虑 OAuth、OpenID Connect 和 SCIM 等互通性标准，并确保您的客户身分和存取管理 (CIAM)、身分和存取管理 (IAM)、多因素身分验证 (MFA) 和特权存取管理 (PAM) 元件能够无缝集成，避免供应商锁定。

我们严谨、多方面的调查方法结合了从业者访谈、技术简报、监管分析和案例研究检验，以确保提供实用、中立的见解。

本研究以多角度整合定性和定量讯息，确保研究结果的三角验证，并使其与实践者和决策者息息相关。主要资讯来源包括对企业、公共部门以及中小企业 (SMB) 安全和身分管理负责人进行的结构化访谈，以及与已完成跨云端、混合和本地环境迁移的解决方案架构师和整合商进行的技术简报。这些对话提供了关于营运限制、供应商绩效和整合权衡的第一手观点。

总之，本文全面探讨了身分现代化，强调实用、分段和位置感知的身份现代化，平衡了安全性、合规性和使用者体验要求。

总之，身分管理处于安全、合规和使用者体验的交汇点，是建立可靠的零信任计画的关键。朝向云端原生、API驱动架构的演进以及以身分为中心的攻击手法的兴起，要求解决方案必须具备可配置性、隐私保护意识和永续营运的特性。因此，决策者在评估身分平台时，不仅要考虑其功能是否一致，还要考虑其整合、扩展和适应不断变化的监管和营运限制的能力。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 零信任身分管理平台市场（按组件划分）

  • 客户身分存取管理
  • 身分和存取管理
  • 多因素身份验证
  • 特权存取管理

9. 依部署模式分類的零信任身分管理平台市场

  • 云
  • 混合云端
  • 本地部署

第十章：依垂直产业分類的零信任身分管理平台市场

  • 银行、金融服务和保险
  • 政府
  • 卫生保健
  • 资讯科技与通讯
  • 零售

11. 各区域零信任身分管理平台市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十二章：按组别分類的零信任身分管理平台市场

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

13. 各国零信任身分管理平台市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十四章：美国零信任身分管理平台市场

第十五章：中国零信任身分管理平台市场

第十六章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Broadcom Inc
  • Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • CyberArk Software Ltd.
  • Delinea Corporation
  • Forcepoint
  • ForgeRock, Inc.
  • International Business Machines Corporation
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Okta, Inc.
  • Ping Identity Holding Corp.
  • SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Product Code: MRR-AE420CB13C89

The Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market was valued at USD 35.23 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 40.11 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 14.40%, reaching USD 90.38 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 35.23 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 40.11 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 90.38 billion
CAGR (%) 14.40%

An authoritative framing of identity as the strategic control plane that balances cyber risk reduction with business enablement in modern hybrid and cloud-native environments

This executive summary introduces the strategic contours of identity management within a Zero Trust paradigm, emphasizing why identity is the control plane for modern cyber defense. Organizations increasingly recognize that perimeter-based defenses are insufficient against sophisticated threat actors and complex hybrid IT environments. Consequently, identity-centric controls-spanning customer identity, workforce access, multifactor authentication, and privileged access-are now central to both security and business enablement.

The introduction outlines the forces driving adoption, the principal technology domains involved, and the organizational imperatives for tighter identity governance. It situates identity solutions as integral to operational resilience, regulatory compliance, and user experience optimization. Starting from this vantage point, subsequent sections parse how technological shifts, policy environments, and procurement models are reshaping requirements and vendor selection criteria.

A clear throughline of this analysis is the interplay between risk reduction and business enablement. Identity solutions are evaluated not just for their ability to stop breaches but for how they enable frictionless user journeys, support cloud-native architectures, and provide auditable trails for regulators and auditors. This framing sets expectations for leaders seeking to align security investments with measurable business outcomes.

How cloud-native architectures, evolving threat patterns, and regulatory expectations are driving a composable and privacy-aware transformation of identity and access management

The landscape of identity and access management is experiencing transformative shifts driven by converging technological, operational, and regulatory imperatives. Cloud-native application architectures and the proliferation of APIs have eroded traditional network perimeters, necessitating identity controls that travel with workloads and users across environments. Concurrently, the adoption of service mesh, container orchestration, and serverless computing demands identity solutions that integrate natively into CI/CD pipelines and runtime platforms.

Operational models are changing as well: security and identity teams are moving from monolithic appliance-based architectures toward modular, composable services that can be consumed from multiple deployment models. This enables organizations to adopt phased Zero Trust journeys, where identity federation, adaptive authentication, and granular authorization policies are introduced incrementally yet remain interoperable. At the same time, threat landscapes are evolving; identity-based attacks such as credential stuffing, account takeover, and lateral movement via compromised privileged accounts require a combination of behavioral analytics, continuous authentication, and robust privileged access controls.

Regulatory scrutiny and privacy expectations are also influencing architecture and data handling choices. Cross-border data transfer rules, sector-specific compliance obligations, and evolving consumer privacy regimes are prompting organizations to reconsider where identity data is stored, how consent is captured, and how identity signals are correlated for fraud detection without violating privacy constraints. These transformative shifts collectively push architects and security leaders to prioritize extensible, privacy-preserving, and context-aware identity platforms.

Assessing the operational and procurement implications of tariff volatility and trade policy changes on identity platform sourcing, architecture, and deployment strategies

The interplay between tariff policy changes and the technology supply chain can materially affect procurement strategies and implementation scheduling, particularly for organizations with geographically distributed procurement or integrated hardware and software stacks. Tariff shifts may alter sourcing choices for on-premise appliances, hardware security modules, or bundled systems that include specialized authentication devices. Procurement teams are therefore reassessing total cost of ownership by factoring in potential trade-related duties, logistics complexity, and supplier diversification to mitigate supply-chain exposure.

Moreover, tariffs can prompt accelerated migration to cloud or hybrid models when cross-border hardware acquisition becomes less predictable or more expensive. Cloud-based delivery reduces the need for physical hardware shipments and can provide a buffer against tariff volatility, though it introduces other operational considerations such as data residency and vendor lock-in. In addition, tariffs that increase costs for specific components may intensify the market focus on software-defined and platform-agnostic identity capabilities that can be deployed across heterogeneous environments without dependency on proprietary hardware.

For technology strategy leaders, the cumulative effect of tariff changes in 2025 underscores the importance of flexible architecture choices, contractual protections with suppliers, and contingency planning. Risk-managed sourcing and an emphasis on cloud-native and software-centric identity components can reduce exposure to trade-related disruptions while preserving the ability to meet security, compliance, and performance objectives.

Strategic segmentation insights that match component capabilities, deployment models, organizational scale, and vertical demands to practical identity architecture and procurement choices

Key segmentation insights illuminate where technology choices, procurement criteria, and implementation tactics diverge across component, deployment model, organization size, and vertical dimensions. When examining the component landscape-Customer Identity Access Management, Identity Access Management, Multi Factor Authentication, and Privileged Access Management-each category addresses distinct risk vectors and user experience goals; CIAM investments prioritize scalable authentication and consent management for external users, IAM centers on workforce lifecycle and directory integration, MFA provides adaptive assurance for transactions and sessions, and PAM secures administrative credentials and session activity for high-risk systems.

Deployment choices-Cloud, Hybrid Cloud, and On Premise-directly influence integration velocity and operational overhead. Cloud-native deployments accelerate time to value and offload infrastructure management, hybrid models enable phased transitions while preserving legacy investments, and on-premise options remain relevant where data residency, latency, or regulatory constraints mandate local control. Organization size also shapes needs: Large Enterprises require extensive role-based governance, complex federation, and fine-grained segregation of duties across global business units, while Small and Medium Businesses often prioritize turnkey solutions with simplified administration and predictable operational costs.

Vertical-specific requirements further refine product fit and prioritization. Banking, Financial Services and Insurance demand strong auditability, transaction-level fraud detection, and regulatory alignment. Government agencies emphasize identity assurance levels, strong credentialing, and interoperability with national identity frameworks. Healthcare organizations balance patient privacy with care-team collaboration workflows, necessitating secure, auditable access patterns. Information Technology and Telecom customers focus on scale and API security to support developer ecosystems, whereas Retail emphasizes consumer experience, rapid onboarding, and fraud mitigation during high-volume transactional periods. Synthesizing these segmentation vectors helps leaders select architectures and vendors that align with their operational constraints and risk tolerance.

Regional considerations and deployment nuances that influence vendor selection, data residency decisions, and identity program governance across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics shape technology adoption patterns, regulatory pressures, and go-to-market approaches in ways that materially affect strategy and execution. In the Americas, organizations frequently prioritize rapid cloud adoption, a strong emphasis on digital customer experiences, and innovation in fraud detection, while regulatory frameworks encourage robust data protection and incident disclosure practices. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and cross-border data protection regimes drive careful attention to data residency and consent management, and many public-sector programs emphasize interoperability and identity assurance for citizen services.

In Asia-Pacific, the market is characterized by a blend of advanced cloud adoption in some markets and pronounced on-premise or hybrid preferences in others; regional diversity leads to a wide variation in deployment models and vendor selection criteria. Asia-Pacific also demonstrates high mobile-first adoption patterns and large-scale consumer identity challenges in retail and fintech verticals, encouraging flexible CIAM architectures capable of handling massive concurrent authentication events. Across regions, channel strategies, partner ecosystems, and local compliance expectations influence implementation timelines and vendor partnerships, with multinational organizations typically opting for modular, multi-region architectures that balance global standards with localized controls.

Understanding these regional nuances enables security and procurement leaders to align vendor selection, data residency strategies, and operational governance with the legal and cultural expectations of each geography, thereby reducing friction during deployment and ensuring sustainable program governance.

How a mix of enterprise platforms, cloud-native entrants, specialized authentication vendors, and integrators shape vendor selection and long-term integration risk in identity programs

The competitive landscape in identity management is defined by a mix of established enterprise platforms, cloud-native challengers, specialized authentication providers, and systems integrators that translate product capabilities into operational programs. Established platforms typically offer breadth across workforce IAM, MFA, and privileged access capabilities, and they remain attractive to organizations seeking consolidated governance, extensive integration ecosystems, and mature support frameworks. Cloud-native providers bring agility through API-first architectures, rapid feature delivery, and native integrations with major public-cloud providers, which can simplify adoption for organizations pursuing cloud-first strategies.

Specialized vendors play an essential role by focusing on high-assurance authentication, behavioral analytics, or privileged session management; these niche capabilities are often consumed alongside broader platforms to fill capability gaps or to provide enhanced controls for critical use cases. Systems integrators and managed service providers are equally important, particularly where organizations require help with identity strategy, complex migration, or ongoing operations such as identity lifecycle management and managed PAM services.

For procurement and architecture teams, the key insight is to prioritize interoperability, open standards, and a clear roadmap for extensibility. Evaluating vendors through the lens of integration APIs, data portability, and support for flexible deployment models reduces long-term risk and preserves the ability to incorporate best-of-breed capabilities as requirements evolve.

Actionable strategic and procurement recommendations for leaders to modernize identity controls through phased adoption, interoperable standards, and governance automation

Industry leaders should adopt a deliberate, phased approach to identity modernization that balances quick wins with foundational architecture work. Begin by articulating desired business outcomes and the specific use cases that will demonstrate value early-such as reducing privileged account sprawl, eliminating high-risk shared credentials, or streamlining consumer onboarding-then map those outcomes to measurable KPIs and governance checkpoints. Prioritize interoperable standards, such as OAuth, OpenID Connect, and SCIM, to ensure that components for CIAM, IAM, MFA, and PAM can be integrated without vendor lock-in.

Adopt a hybrid-first mindset for migration pathways: leverage cloud-native services where governance and data residency permit, but maintain hybrid or on-premise options for systems with strict latency or regulatory constraints. Elevate identity governance by formalizing role and entitlement reviews, implementing least-privilege policies, and automating lifecycle processes to reduce manual errors. Invest in adaptive authentication that uses contextual signals to minimize user friction while raising assurance where risk indicators are present.

Finally, develop procurement strategies that include contractual protections for supply-chain changes, including tariff and trade volatility, while specifying integration SLAs and data portability clauses. Combine vendor evaluations with proof-of-concept pilots that verify integration with critical toolchains and measure operational overhead. By aligning technical modernization with governance, procurement flexibility, and measurable outcomes, leaders reduce implementation risk and accelerate the realization of security and business benefits.

A rigorous multi-method research approach combining practitioner interviews, technical briefings, regulatory analysis, and case-study validation to ensure practical, vendor-neutral insights

This research synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs through a multi-method approach designed to triangulate findings and ensure relevance to practitioners and decision-makers. Primary inputs include structured interviews with security and identity leaders across enterprise, public-sector, and SMB contexts, as well as technical briefings with solution architects and integrators that have executed migrations across cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments. These conversations provide first-hand perspectives on operational constraints, vendor performance, and integration trade-offs.

Secondary research draws on publicly available regulatory texts, technology whitepapers, product documentation, and peer-reviewed academic literature to ground technical claims in verifiable standards and best practices. The analysis also incorporates case-study validation, where anonymized deployment experiences are synthesized to highlight lessons learned, common pitfalls, and success factors. Across all inputs, findings are validated through cross-referencing and peer review by practitioners to reduce bias and enhance applicability.

Methodologically, the research emphasizes reproducibility and transparency: segmentation criteria are applied consistently across component, deployment model, organization size, and vertical dimensions, and the implications of regional regulatory environments are explicitly documented. Where applicable, technical evaluations focus on standards compliance, integration capabilities, and operational requirements rather than promotional claims, ensuring that recommendations remain vendor-neutral and actionable.

A concluding synthesis emphasizing pragmatic, segmented, and regionally aware identity modernization that balances security, compliance, and user experience imperatives

In conclusion, identity management sits at the nexus of security, compliance, and user experience, and it is indispensable for any credible Zero Trust program. The evolution toward cloud-native, API-driven architectures and the rise of identity-centric threat vectors require solutions that are composable, privacy-conscious, and operationally sustainable. Decision-makers must therefore evaluate identity platforms not only on feature parity but on their ability to integrate, scale, and adapt alongside evolving regulatory and operational constraints.

Segmentation considerations-across component specializations, deployment models, organization size, and vertical needs-should drive tailored strategies rather than one-size-fits-all buys. Regional nuances further demand that leaders balance global controls with localized implementation to meet jurisdictional requirements and customer expectations. By following a staged modernization approach, emphasizing interoperability and governance automation, organizations can strengthen their security posture while minimizing disruption to business operations.

Ultimately, the most effective path forward is a pragmatic one: combine targeted pilots and proof-of-concepts with clear governance and procurement guardrails, and maintain an architecture that is flexible enough to incorporate emerging capabilities without sacrificing control or compliance.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Component

  • 8.1. Customer Identity Access Management
  • 8.2. Identity Access Management
  • 8.3. Multi Factor Authentication
  • 8.4. Privileged Access Management

9. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Deployment Model

  • 9.1. Cloud
  • 9.2. Hybrid Cloud
  • 9.3. On Premise

10. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Vertical

  • 10.1. Banking Financial Services And Insurance
  • 10.2. Government
  • 10.3. Healthcare
  • 10.4. Information Technology And Telecom
  • 10.5. Retail

11. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Region

  • 11.1. Americas
    • 11.1.1. North America
    • 11.1.2. Latin America
  • 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 11.2.1. Europe
    • 11.2.2. Middle East
    • 11.2.3. Africa
  • 11.3. Asia-Pacific

12. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Group

  • 12.1. ASEAN
  • 12.2. GCC
  • 12.3. European Union
  • 12.4. BRICS
  • 12.5. G7
  • 12.6. NATO

13. Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market, by Country

  • 13.1. United States
  • 13.2. Canada
  • 13.3. Mexico
  • 13.4. Brazil
  • 13.5. United Kingdom
  • 13.6. Germany
  • 13.7. France
  • 13.8. Russia
  • 13.9. Italy
  • 13.10. Spain
  • 13.11. China
  • 13.12. India
  • 13.13. Japan
  • 13.14. Australia
  • 13.15. South Korea

14. United States Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market

15. China Zero Trust Identity Management Platform Market

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 16.5. Broadcom Inc
  • 16.6. Cisco Systems, Inc.
  • 16.7. CyberArk Software Ltd.
  • 16.8. Delinea Corporation
  • 16.9. Forcepoint
  • 16.10. ForgeRock, Inc.
  • 16.11. International Business Machines Corporation
  • 16.12. Microsoft Corporation
  • 16.13. Okta, Inc.
  • 16.14. Ping Identity Holding Corp.
  • 16.15. SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CUSTOMER IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CUSTOMER IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CUSTOMER IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY IDENTITY ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI FACTOR AUTHENTICATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVILEGED ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVILEGED ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY PRIVILEGED ACCESS MANAGEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID CLOUD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID CLOUD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID CLOUD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ON PREMISE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ON PREMISE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY ON PREMISE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES AND INSURANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. AMERICAS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. NORTH AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. LATIN AMERICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. EUROPE ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. MIDDLE EAST ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. AFRICA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. ASIA-PACIFIC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. ASEAN ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. GCC ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPEAN UNION ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. BRICS ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. G7 ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. NATO ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GLOBAL ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. UNITED STATES ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY COMPONENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT MODEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. CHINA ZERO TRUST IDENTITY MANAGEMENT PLATFORM MARKET SIZE, BY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)