封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1918920

生物基环保垃圾袋市场按材料类型、最终用户、销售管道和袋型划分-2026-2032年全球预测

Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market by Material Type, End User, Sales Channel, Bag Type - Global Forecast 2026-2032

出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 181 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

2025年生物基环保垃圾袋市值为1.0573亿美元,预计2026年将成长至1.1393亿美元,年复合成长率为8.52%,到2032年将达到1.8742亿美元。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 1.0573亿美元
预计年份:2026年 1.1393亿美元
预测年份 2032 1.8742亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 8.52%

从技术、政策和商业性应用路径的角度,建构生物基和环保垃圾袋的机会和战略背景框架

生物基环保垃圾袋的出现,体现了材料科学、监管压力以及消费者对永续废弃物管理日益增长的期望三者之间的融合。本执行摘要影响产品推广的创新途径、供应链动态和需求方行为,并为製造、零售、废弃物管理和采购等各环节的相关人员提炼出策略背景。其目标是为决策者提供切实可行的指导,帮助他们确定投资优先事项、优化产品系列,并将商业策略与永续性目标和合规要求相协调。

材料创新、监管力度和买家期望如何汇聚,重塑供应链并加速永续废弃物管理解决方案的采用

由于技术进步和监管要求的双重影响,生物基垃圾袋的市场格局正在迅速变化。聚合物共混物、添加剂配方和製造过程的进步正在缩小传统聚乙烯垃圾袋与生物基替代品之间的性能差距,提高拉伸强度、抗穿刺性和保质期。这些材料创新,加上供应链整合和规模经济的提升,降低了技术进入门槛,并拓展了其应用范围。

了解2025年美国关税调整对企业营运和采购的影响,以及这些调整将如何改变采购、製造和合约策略。

美国将于2025年生效的关税调整将对生物基垃圾袋及相关原料的生产商和进口商带来特定的成本和营运方面的考量。关税调整将影响国际采购的特殊生物聚合物、催化剂和添加剂的到岸成本,促使采购部门重新评估其供应商组合和总体拥有成本(TCO)。因此,各公司正在评估替代筹资策略,例如区域供应来源多元化、近岸外包和提高垂直整合度,以保护利润率并确保交货的稳定性。

详细的細項分析揭示了材料类型、终端用户画像、销售管道和包装结构如何驱动差异化的产品和商业策略。

细分市场分析揭示了不同材料类型、最终用户、销售管道和包装结构所带来的不同采用路径和价值驱动因素,阐明了每个维度对产品设计、市场推广策略和供应链配置的影响。Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate、聚羟基烷酯、聚乳酸和淀粉混合物等材料各自具有不同的加工要求、性能权衡和认证标准,这些都会影响生产效率、资本投资需求和生物降解性声明。

美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的区域动态和基础设施差异将决定招募途径和供应商竞争力。

区域趋势正在塑造生物基垃圾袋的竞争格局和市场推广路径,不同的法规结构、基础设施成熟度和消费者偏好都影响着这个格局。在美洲,州和地方层级的监管活动正在推动可堆肥产品的定向采购政策和奖励。同时,北美製造地受益于接近性大型零售集团和成熟的废弃物收集系统。该地区的供应链关係和物流效率有利于那些能够及时交付并为大规模买家提供客製化服务的供应商。

透过材料研发、供应安全和认证伙伴关係,制定竞争定位和创新领导策略,从而实现市场差异化。

生物基垃圾袋市场的竞争格局复杂多样,既有传统聚合物製造商,也有专业生物聚合物製造商,以及专注于经认证可堆肥产品的灵活型小型企业。主要企业透过投资材料科学、提供检验的废弃物处理声明以及构建整合的价值链能力来脱颖而出,从而减少对波动性原材料进口的依赖。与废弃物处理服务商和认证机构建立合作关係的企业,在面向机构投资者和市政当局的行销中获得了显着的信誉优势。

以投资组合调整、供应链韧性、认证、通路优化和伙伴关係关係主导的试点计画为重点的实用策略建议

产业领导者应优先采取一系列实际行动,以充分利用生物基垃圾袋加速转型带来的机会,同时应对近期供应链和政策的不确定性。首先,透过投资研发针对餐饮服务、医疗保健、家庭和工业等不同需求的材料和结构,使产品系列与明确的终端用户群相匹配。这有助于减少采购流程中的摩擦,并在性能至关重要的领域巩固高端市场地位。其次,应加强供应商网路建设,重点关注双重采购策略、区域合作伙伴以及原材料可追溯性,以降低关税风险并缩短前置作业时间。

我们采用透明、严谨的混合方法研究途径,结合实务工作者访谈、技术检验和政策分析,为我们的策略结论提供支援。

本执行摘要的研究整合了一手和二手资料,全面分析了影响生物基垃圾袋普及的技术、商业性和政策因素。一手资料包括对材料科学家、主要采购机构的采购人员和包装工程师的结构化访谈,以及在条件允许的情况下对生产和堆肥设施的实地考察。这些面对面的交流有助于评估生产限制、认证障碍和最终用户的性能期望。

整合策略要务,将材料创新、检验和通路特定商业化结合,以抓住市场机会,同时管控贸易和营运风险。

总之,向生物基和环保垃圾袋的转型代表着一个多方面的机会,技术进步与不断变化的监管和消费者期望在此交汇融合。该行业的特点是材料类型、最终用户、销售管道和袋子结构等方面的需求各不相同,因此需要製定有针对性的细分产品策略。贸易政策的发展,例如2025年美国关税调整,进一步增加了采购的复杂性,促使企业增强采购的灵活性,并在可能的情况下考虑本地生产和替代配方。

目录

第一章:序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵,2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章:美国关税的累积影响,2025年

第七章:人工智慧的累积影响,2025年

第八章 依材料种类分類的生物基环保垃圾袋市场

  • Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate
  • 聚羟基烷酯
  • 聚乳酸
  • 淀粉混合物

第九章 生物基环保垃圾袋市场(依终端用户划分)

  • 商业的
    • 食品服务业
    • 卫生保健
    • 饭店业
  • 家用
  • 工业的

第十章 生物基环保垃圾袋市场销售管道

  • 便利商店
  • 线上零售
    • 品牌官方网站
    • 市场
  • 专卖店
    • 批发商
    • 环保商店
  • 超级市场和大卖场

第十一章 生物基环保垃圾袋市场(以袋型划分)

  • 多层
  • 单层

第十二章 各地区生物基环保垃圾袋市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 生物基环保垃圾袋市场(依类别划分)

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 各国生物基环保垃圾袋市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章美国生物基环保垃圾袋市场

第十六章 中国生物基环保垃圾袋市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析,2025年
    • 浓度比(CR)
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析,2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析,2025 年
  • Avantium NV
  • BASF SE
  • Bio-Fed, Inc.
  • BioBag International AS
  • Biome Bioplastics Limited
  • Braskem SA
  • Cardia Bioplastics Pty Ltd
  • Danimer Scientific, Inc.
  • Earthcycle, Inc.
  • FKuR Kunststoff GmbH
  • Green Dot Bioplastics
  • Hangzhou Shanying Bioplastics Co., Ltd.
  • Jiangsu Guotai International Group
  • Kaneka Corporation
  • Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
  • NatureWorks LLC
  • Novamont SpA
  • Plantic Technologies Limited
  • PolyOne Corporation
  • Shanghai Ecomate Co., Ltd.
  • Shenzhen Hengyi Bio-based Materials Co., Ltd.
  • Synbra Technology BV
  • Tipton Corporation
  • TotalEnergies Corbion Biotech BV
  • Zhejiang Hisun Biomaterials Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-F14BA1B340C1

The Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market was valued at USD 105.73 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 113.93 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 8.52%, reaching USD 187.42 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 105.73 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 113.93 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 187.42 million
CAGR (%) 8.52%

Framing the opportunity and strategic context for bio-based and environmentally friendly garbage bags across technology, policy, and commercial adoption pathways

Bio-based, environmentally friendly garbage bags represent a convergence of material science, regulatory pressure, and shifting consumer expectations toward sustainable waste management. This executive summary distills the strategic context for stakeholders across manufacturing, retail, waste management, and procurement functions by focusing on innovation vectors, supply chain dynamics, and demand-side behaviors that influence adoption. The aim here is to provide decision-makers with actionable context to prioritize investments, refine product portfolios, and align commercial strategies with sustainability objectives and compliance requirements.

In recent years, advances in polymer chemistry and biopolymers have expanded the palette of viable materials for single-use and multi-use waste containment, enabling products that maintain performance characteristics while reducing reliance on fossil-based feedstocks. Simultaneously, regulatory frameworks and corporate commitments to circularity have created new performance thresholds for compostability, home-compostability, and industrial composting compatibility. Therefore, understanding these intersecting forces is essential for stakeholders seeking to capture demand and mitigate transition risks.

This introduction outlines market drivers, technology considerations, and stakeholder motivations without attempting to quantify market size or trajectory. By clarifying the operational and strategic implications of bio-based garbage bag adoption, the section sets the stage for deeper analysis of trade policy impacts, segmentation dynamics, regional considerations, competitive positioning, and operational recommendations that follow.

How material innovation, regulatory momentum, and buyer expectations are converging to reshape supply chains and accelerate adoption of sustainable waste containment solutions

The landscape for bio-based garbage bags is shifting rapidly due to simultaneous technological progress and evolving regulatory expectations. Advances in polymer blends, additive packages, and production processes are reducing the performance gap between conventional polyethylene bags and bio-based alternatives, improving tensile strength, puncture resistance, and shelf life. These material innovations, combined with improvements in supply chain integration and economies of scale, are lowering technical barriers to entry and enabling a broader set of use cases.

Concurrently, policy momentum is reshaping procurement criteria and corporate purchasing behavior. Extended producer responsibility regimes, bans on certain single-use plastics, and procurement guidelines favoring compostable or bio-based solutions are prompting municipalities, large food service operators, and retailers to re-evaluate their specifications. As a result, buyers increasingly prioritize certifications and end-of-life compatibility, and suppliers are responding by investing in validated compostability claims and third-party testing.

On the commercial front, branding and consumer perception are influencing shelf placement and pricing strategies. Retailers and hospitality chains are using sustainability credentials as differentiators, which elevates demand for certified materials and documented supply chain traceability. Taken together, these transformative shifts underscore an inflection point in which the interplay of technology, regulation, and buyer expectations accelerates strategic repositioning for manufacturers and downstream partners.

Understanding the operational and procurement implications of United States tariff adjustments in 2025 and how they alter sourcing, manufacturing, and contractual strategies

United States tariff changes implemented in 2025 introduce tangible cost and operational considerations for manufacturers and importers of bio-based garbage bags and related feedstocks. Tariff adjustments affect the landed cost of specialty biopolymers, catalysts, and additive components sourced internationally, prompting procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios and total cost of ownership. As a direct consequence, organizations are evaluating alternative sourcing strategies, including regional supply diversification, nearshoring, and greater vertical integration to protect margins and maintain delivery reliability.

Procurement leaders are increasingly conducting scenario analyses to identify suppliers with vertically integrated capacities or flexible contracting arrangements that can pass through or absorb tariff volatility. In some cases, manufacturers are accelerating qualification of domestic resin alternatives or reformulating blends to rely less on tariff-exposed inputs. These responses are not purely tactical; they influence capital allocation decisions related to equipment retrofits, inventory policies, and long-term supplier development.

Beyond direct cost implications, tariffs can affect supplier relations and lead times, with ripple effects on product launches and promotional cycles. Stakeholders should therefore consider tariff exposure when negotiating contracts, designing product specifications, and mapping contingency inventories. Importantly, tariff-driven adjustments are prompting a renewed focus on trade compliance capabilities and the need for clearer contractual clauses that allocate risk and define price revision mechanisms in response to changes in trade policy.

Deep segmentation analysis revealing how material types, end-user profiles, sales channels, and bag construction drive differentiated product and commercial strategies

Segmentation insights reveal differentiated adoption pathways and value drivers across material types, end users, sales channels, and bag constructions, and each axis offers implications for product design, go-to-market strategy, and supply chain configuration. Materials such as Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate, Polyhydroxyalkanoates, Polylactic Acid, and starch blends each present distinct processing requirements, performance trade-offs, and certification profiles, which influence production throughput, capital investment needs, and composability claims.

End users exhibit nuanced demand signals: commercial buyers prioritize reliability and regulatory compliance in food service, healthcare, and hospitality contexts where waste hygiene and containment performance are paramount; household consumers focus on ease of use, odor control, and alignment with environmental values; industrial customers emphasize durability, bulk handling properties, and compatibility with existing waste processing equipment. These divergent priorities necessitate tailored product specifications and segmented marketing approaches.

Sales channels further mediate customer expectations and packaging formats. Convenience stores, online retail platforms comprised of brand websites and marketplaces, specialty stores that include bulk suppliers and eco-focused retailers, and supermarkets and hypermarkets each influence SKU assortment, unit sizing, and promotional mechanics. Finally, bag construction-whether multi-layer or single-layer-impacts material costs, performance characteristics, and recyclability considerations, and therefore should be matched deliberately to the targeted end user and sales channel to optimize both cost and customer satisfaction.

Regional dynamics and infrastructure variances across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that determine adoption pathways and supplier competitiveness

Regional dynamics shape the competitive environment and pathway to adoption for bio-based garbage bags, with distinct regulatory frameworks, infrastructure maturity, and consumer preferences across geographies. In the Americas, regulatory activity at state and municipal levels has driven targeted procurement policies and incentives for compostable products, while North American manufacturing hubs benefit from proximity to large retail conglomerates and established waste collection systems. Supply chain relationships and logistic efficiencies in the region favor suppliers who can offer timely fulfillment and customization for large-format buyers.

Europe, the Middle East & Africa present a heterogeneous landscape where stringent European standards and EPR frameworks coexist with emerging markets that are still developing end-of-life infrastructure. European buyers typically require robust certification and traceability, thereby favoring suppliers with validated composting claims and sustainability reporting. In parts of the Middle East and Africa, market penetration is accelerated by initiatives to reduce plastic consumption in coastal and tourism-heavy areas, but growth is conditioned by infrastructure investment and local manufacturing capabilities.

Asia-Pacific combines high production capability with variable regulatory trajectories; certain markets in the region are advanced in biopolymer production and export-ready manufacturing capacity, whereas others are focused on scaling collection and processing systems. As a result, firms targeting Asia-Pacific must balance cost-competitive production with regional compliance and adapt offerings to local waste management realities to secure long-term customer relationships.

Competitive positioning and innovation leadership strategies that define market differentiation through material R&D, supply security, and validation partnerships

Competitive dynamics in the bio-based garbage bag space reflect a mix of legacy polymer producers, specialized biopolymer manufacturers, and agile small and medium enterprises focused on certified compostable products. Leading companies differentiate through investments in material science, validated end-of-life claims, and integrated value chain capabilities that reduce dependency on volatile feedstock imports. Firms that have established partnerships with waste processors and certification bodies achieve a distinct credibility advantage when marketing to institutional buyers and municipalities.

Innovation leaders typically demonstrate strengths in process optimization, enabling multi-layer constructions that balance cost and performance, or in proprietary formulations of polylactic acid or polyhydroxyalkanoates that improve puncture resistance and elongation. At the same time, supply-focused players invest in diversified resin sourcing or local extrusion capacity to mitigate trade-related exposure and ensure supply continuity. Meanwhile, commercial challengers that concentrate on retail positioning and brand messaging gain traction through curated channel strategies and targeted packaging that speaks to consumer values around compostability and circularity.

Strategic partnerships-ranging from joint product development with major food service operators to logistics agreements with waste collection firms-are proving to be decisive differentiators. These alliances allow companies to validate claims across the product life cycle, accelerate adoption in institutional contracts, and capture upstream and downstream insights that inform future product iterations.

Actionable strategic recommendations focused on portfolio alignment, supply chain resilience, certification, channel optimization, and partnership-driven adoption pilots

Industry leaders should prioritize a set of concrete actions to capitalize on the accelerating shift toward bio-based garbage bags while managing near-term supply chain and policy uncertainties. First, align product portfolios to clearly defined end-user segments by investing in material variants and constructions tailored to food service, healthcare, household, and industrial requirements; this reduces friction in procurement cycles and supports premium positioning where performance is mission-critical. Second, strengthen supplier networks with an emphasis on dual-source strategies, regional partners, and feedstock traceability to mitigate tariff exposure and shorten lead times.

Third, invest proactively in third-party validation and transparent labeling that clarifies compostability and end-of-life pathways; certification alignment with major municipal and commercial composting standards will accelerate institutional procurement. Fourth, develop commercial models that reflect channel-specific requirements-offering different SKU sizes, packaging formats, and fulfillment terms to supermarkets, online marketplaces, specialty eco-stores, and convenience retailers. Fifth, pursue strategic partnerships with waste processors, municipalities, and large-scale end users to co-develop product pilots that demonstrate real-world performance, thereby de-risking adoption for conservative buyers.

Finally, augment trade compliance capabilities and contract terms to include tariff pass-through clauses and inventory hedging strategies. By combining product differentiation, supply chain resilience, rigorous validation, and channel-specific commercial models, leaders can capture high-value opportunities while controlling operational downside risks.

Transparent and rigorous mixed-methods research approach integrating practitioner interviews, technical validation, and policy analysis to support strategic conclusions

The research underpinning this executive summary synthesizes primary and secondary inputs to build a comprehensive view of technological, commercial, and policy forces shaping bio-based garbage bag adoption. Primary inputs include structured interviews with material scientists, procurement leads from major institutional buyers, and packaging engineers, combined with on-site visits to manufacturing operations and composting facilities where feasible. These direct conversations informed assessments of production constraints, certification hurdles, and end-user performance expectations.

Secondary research involved review of regulatory texts, industry best-practice guidance documents, and public disclosures from corporations and certification bodies to verify compliance pathways and labeling standards. Trade and logistics analyses incorporated publicly available customs data, tariff schedules, and observable shipment patterns to evaluate exposure to policy shifts. Throughout, the methodology emphasized triangulation: claims and trends identified in secondary sources were validated against practitioner interviews to ensure relevance and accuracy.

Quality controls included cross-review by technical experts to confirm material performance characterizations and by commercial analysts to validate channel and procurement insights. While this summary refrains from publishing quantitative market sizing or forecasts, the approach provides a robust, evidence-based foundation for the strategic observations and recommendations presented, and it supports bespoke follow-up engagements for bespoke modeling or deeper due diligence.

Synthesis of strategic imperatives that combine material innovation, validation, and channel-specific commercialization to capture adoption opportunities while managing trade and operational risks

In conclusion, the transition to bio-based, environmentally friendly garbage bags represents a multifaceted opportunity that combines technological progress with shifting regulatory and buyer expectations. The space is characterized by differentiated demands across material types, end users, sales channels, and bag constructions that require deliberately segmented product strategies. Trade policy developments such as United States tariff adjustments in 2025 add a layer of procurement complexity, prompting firms to strengthen sourcing resilience and consider regional manufacturing or alternative formulations where feasible.

Taken together, these dynamics suggest that success will favor organizations that couple material innovation with credible validation of end-of-life claims, that design commercial approaches tailored to distinct channels and buyer profiles, and that invest in partnerships across the value chain to demonstrate real-world performance. By integrating these elements into a coherent strategic plan, manufacturers, retailers, and institutional buyers can accelerate adoption while managing the operational and regulatory risks associated with the transition to sustainable waste containment solutions.

For teams seeking to operationalize the insights in this summary, targeted follow-up work focused on supplier due diligence, certification roadmaps, and channel-specific commercialization plans will unlock actionable next steps and shorten time to adoption.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by Material Type

  • 8.1. Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate
  • 8.2. Polyhydroxyalkanoates
  • 8.3. Polylactic Acid
  • 8.4. Starch Blend

9. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by End User

  • 9.1. Commercial
    • 9.1.1. Food Service
    • 9.1.2. Healthcare
    • 9.1.3. Hospitality
  • 9.2. Household
  • 9.3. Industrial

10. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by Sales Channel

  • 10.1. Convenience Stores
  • 10.2. Online Retail
    • 10.2.1. Brand Websites
    • 10.2.2. Marketplaces
  • 10.3. Specialty Stores
    • 10.3.1. Bulk Suppliers
    • 10.3.2. Eco-Friendly Stores
  • 10.4. Supermarkets & Hypermarkets

11. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by Bag Type

  • 11.1. Multi-Layer
  • 11.2. Single-Layer

12. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market

16. China Bio-Based Environmentally Friendly Garbage Bag Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. Avantium N.V.
  • 17.6. BASF SE
  • 17.7. Bio-Fed, Inc.
  • 17.8. BioBag International AS
  • 17.9. Biome Bioplastics Limited
  • 17.10. Braskem S.A
  • 17.11. Cardia Bioplastics Pty Ltd
  • 17.12. Danimer Scientific, Inc.
  • 17.13. Earthcycle, Inc.
  • 17.14. FKuR Kunststoff GmbH
  • 17.15. Green Dot Bioplastics
  • 17.16. Hangzhou Shanying Bioplastics Co., Ltd.
  • 17.17. Jiangsu Guotai International Group
  • 17.18. Kaneka Corporation
  • 17.19. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation
  • 17.20. NatureWorks LLC
  • 17.21. Novamont S.p.A
  • 17.22. Plantic Technologies Limited
  • 17.23. PolyOne Corporation
  • 17.24. Shanghai Ecomate Co., Ltd.
  • 17.25. Shenzhen Hengyi Bio-based Materials Co., Ltd.
  • 17.26. Synbra Technology BV
  • 17.27. Tipton Corporation
  • 17.28. TotalEnergies Corbion Biotech BV
  • 17.29. Zhejiang Hisun Biomaterials Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYBUTYLENE ADIPATE TEREPHTHALATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYHYDROXYALKANOATES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY POLYLACTIC ACID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH BLEND, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH BLEND, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY STARCH BLEND, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD SERVICE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD SERVICE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY FOOD SERVICE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALITY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HOSPITALITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HOUSEHOLD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HOUSEHOLD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY HOUSEHOLD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY CONVENIENCE STORES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY CONVENIENCE STORES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY CONVENIENCE STORES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BRAND WEBSITES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BRAND WEBSITES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BRAND WEBSITES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MARKETPLACES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MARKETPLACES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MARKETPLACES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BULK SUPPLIERS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BULK SUPPLIERS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BULK SUPPLIERS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ECO-FRIENDLY STORES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ECO-FRIENDLY STORES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ECO-FRIENDLY STORES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SUPERMARKETS & HYPERMARKETS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SUPERMARKETS & HYPERMARKETS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SUPERMARKETS & HYPERMARKETS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI-LAYER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI-LAYER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MULTI-LAYER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE-LAYER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE-LAYER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SINGLE-LAYER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GLOBAL BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY MATERIAL TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SALES CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY ONLINE RETAIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY SPECIALTY STORES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA BIO-BASED ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY GARBAGE BAG MARKET SIZE, BY BAG TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)