查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1919401

半导体自动管理储存系统 (AMHS) 市场按系统类型、晶圆尺寸、自动化程度、连接埠类型、应用和最终用户划分 - 全球预测 2026-2032 年

AMHS for Semiconductor Market by System Type, Wafer Size, Automation Level, Port Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 188 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，半导体 AMHS 市场价值将达到 48.1 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长到 51.1 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 84.4 亿美元，复合年增长率为 8.36%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 48.1亿美元
预计年份：2026年 51.1亿美元
预测年份 2032 84.4亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 8.36%

半导体製造厂自动化物料搬运系统（AMHS）的策略方法：确定技术基础、营运目标和整合需求

现代动态半导体製造厂依赖一套运输和储存技术生态系统，该系统连接设备、物流和工厂控制层，从而在复杂的製程流程中实现确定性的物料流。过去十年，机器人技术、感测器套件和工厂软体的成熟，已将物料搬运从单纯的辅助功能转变为优化产能和降低风险的战略槓桿。

新的技术和营运转折点正在重塑自动化物料搬运系统设计、以软体为中心的最佳化以及供应链弹性策略。

由于技术、供应链和製造策略的融合，半导体製造领域的自动化物料搬运系统 (AMHS) 格局正在经历变革性变化。工业自主性和机器学习的进步正在加速从基于规则的路径规划向动态的、最佳化主导的物料流的转变，后者能够适应即时约束和设备状况。同时，晶圆直径的不断增大和设备丛集的增加，使得低延迟传输和精确排序变得愈发重要，迫使供应商改进机器设计和软体架构，以满足更严格的公差要求。

近期关税变化对采购计算、供应链本地化、库存策略以及自动化物料搬运系统实施的资本规划的影响。

美国当局宣布的2025年累积关税措施，为半导体自动化物料搬运系统（AMHS）的采购、製造地选择和供应商策略带来了新的动态。关税带来的成本压力加剧，促使采购决策受到严格审查，采购团队重新评估总到岸成本、供应商多元化以及近岸外包和双重采购安排的潜在效益。为此，一些全球供应商正在加速组装和配置能力的在地化，以降低关税风险，同时保持进入关键市场的机会。

将系统拓扑结构、最终用户优先权、晶圆处理尺寸和介面配置与实际应用路径和效能权衡连结起来的定向細項分析

这种细分方法为分析不同系统类型、最终用户、晶圆尺寸、自动化程度、连接埠配置和应用范围的自动化储存和储存系统 (AMHS) 效能和采用模式提供了一个聚焦视角。在评估系统类型时，应考虑自动导引车 (AGV)、自动化仓库系统、输送机网路和高架运输解决方案，并认识到 AGV 的各种类型（例如雷射导引和磁感应）在导航精度、基础设施要求和无尘室整合方面存在固有差异。从最终用户的观点来看，代工厂、专注于逻辑和记忆体的集成设备製造商以及外包半导体组装和测试服务供应商的营运重点各不相同，各自侧重于吞吐量、处理能力和污染控制标准。

区域采用模式和策略差异化因素将影响美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区製造业生态系统中自动化物料搬运系统的采用。

区域因素透过劳动力可用性、资本密集度、管理体制和生态系统成熟度来影响先进製造和储存系统 (AMHS) 的策略。在美洲，半导体投资正朝着回流、采用整合生产力计画的晶圆厂以及更加註重先进封装的方向发展，这推动了对适应不同产品环境的灵活晶圆厂内运输和自动化解决方案的需求。该地区的供应链多元化努力也推动了部署模式的转变，这些模式优先考虑模组化升级和强大的本地服务网络，以最大限度地降低停机风险。

供应商如何从硬体供应商转型为解决方案合作伙伴：整合编配软体、预测服务和经认证的互通性解决方案

领先的供应商和整合商正在拓展其价值主张，不再局限于硬件，而是透过以软体为中心的编配、分析和全生命週期服务模式，降低部署风险并加快价值实现速度。许多供应商现在将边缘控制系统、工厂整合中间件和机器健康分析打包到其託管服务提案中，使客户能够从资本支出模式转向可预测的营运支出模式。随着企业寻求提供检验的解决方案堆迭以降低整合复杂性并加快部署速度，机器人专家、控制软体供应商和系统整合商之间的策略联盟正变得越来越普遍。

为製造商和供应商提供切实可行的、优先排序的建议，以增强韧性、加快整合并最大限度地提高AMHS投资回报。

产业领导者应制定一套切实可行的优先事项，在短期产能提升与长期柔软性和风险规避之间取得平衡。优先采用模组化自动物料搬运系统（AMHS）架构，以便逐步扩展产能和更换零件，从而降低关税衝击、供应商中断和设计过时带来的风险。投资于标准化软体介面数位双胞胎，以便在资本支出决策之前验证布局变更、离线检验路由逻辑并预测产能影响。这种方法可以降低试运行风险并加快投资回报的实现。

结合专家访谈、技术综合、案例分析和交叉检验等多种方法，采用稳健的混合研究途径，确保研究结果具有可操作性和检验。

本分析所依据的研究采用了严谨的一手研究和二手研究结合的方法，旨在检验技术趋势、实施方法和策略性应变措施。一手研究包括对晶圆厂营运商、系统整合商、自动化工程师和元件供应商进行深度访谈，以收集关于实施挑战、效能优先顺序和未来发展蓝图的一线观点。这些访谈为情境建构提供了依据，并阐明了不同系统拓扑结构和连接埠标准相关的营运权衡。

简要概述模组化、标准化和运作准备就绪性为何是决定晶圆厂自动化物料搬运系统成功与否的关键因素

在半导体製造领域，自动化物料搬运系统已从辅助角色发展成为策略基础设施。先进机器人技术、软体定义控制和供应链重组的整合正在重塑晶圆厂管理产能、污染控制以及应对製程切换复杂性的方式。决策者若能整合模组化硬体、互通软体和稳健的筹资策略，将更有能力应对监管变化、关税趋势和不断变化的製程需求。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 半导体自动管理储存系统市场（依系统类型划分）

  • 自动导引车
    • 雷射导引运输车
    • 磁感应运输车
  • 自动化仓库系统
  • 输送机系统
  • 高架运输系统

9. 依晶圆尺寸分類的半导体AMHS市场

  • 200mm
  • 300mm

第十章 依自动化程度分類的半导体自动管理储存系统市场

  • 全自动
  • 半自动

第十一章 半导体AMHS市场按连接埠类型划分

  • FOSB
  • FOUP
  • 敞开式前门
  • SMIF

第十二章 半导体AMHS市场依应用领域划分

  • 工厂间运输
  • 进程内的运输

第十三章：半导体AMHS市场（以最终用户划分）

  • 铸造厂
  • IDM逻辑
  • IDM记忆体
  • OSAT

第十四章 半导体AMHS市场（按地区划分）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十五章 半导体AMHS市场（依组别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十六章：各国半导体AMHS市场

  • 美国
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十七章美国半导体市场

第十八章：中国半导体AMHS市场

第十九章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ABB Ltd.
  • Applied Materials, Inc.
  • ASM Pacific Technology Ltd.
  • Brooks Automation, Inc.
  • Daifuku Co., Ltd.
  • Fanuc Corporation
  • Hitachi High-Tech Corporation
  • Intel Corporation
  • JTEKT Corporation
  • KION Group AG
  • KLA Corporation
  • KUKA AG
  • Lam Research Corporation
  • Micron Technology, Inc.
  • Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • Murata Machinery, Ltd.
  • NSK Ltd.
  • Panasonic Holdings Corporation
  • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • SK hynix Inc.
  • Teradyne, Inc.
  • Tokyo Electron Limited
  • TSMC
  • Yaskawa Electric Corporation
Product Code: MRR-F14BA1B34306

The AMHS for Semiconductor Market was valued at USD 4.81 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.11 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 8.36%, reaching USD 8.44 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 4.81 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 5.11 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 8.44 billion
CAGR (%) 8.36%

A strategic orientation to automated material handling systems in semiconductor fabs clarifying the technological building blocks, operational objectives, and integration imperatives

The semiconductor industry's relentless push for yield improvement, throughput gains, and contamination control places automated material handling systems (AMHS) at the center of operational planning. Modern fabs rely on an ecosystem of transport and storage technologies that bridge equipment, logistics, and factory control layers, enabling deterministic material flow across complex process sequences. Over the past decade, the maturation of robotics, sensor suites, and factory software has reframed material handling from a utility function into a strategic lever for capacity optimization and risk reduction.

Early adopters moved from manual cassette transfers to deterministic automated guided vehicles and overhead transport networks designed for cleanroom compliance, and today the conversation centers on interoperability, predictive maintenance, and software-defined material routing. As wafer diameters, tool densities, and process steps evolve, engineers and process owners must align AMHS architectures with both tool throughput and the broader production control stack. This introduction lays the groundwork for understanding how system topologies, interface standards, and operational policies together influence fab agility and long-term capital efficiency.

Emerging technological and operational inflection points reshaping automated material handling system design, software-centric optimization, and supply chain resilience strategies

The landscape for AMHS in semiconductor manufacturing is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces across technology, supply chains, and manufacturing strategy. Advances in industrial autonomy and machine learning have accelerated the move from rule-based routing to dynamic, optimization-driven material flow that adapts to real-time constraints and equipment states. Concurrently, the push toward higher wafer diameters and denser tool clusters increases the importance of low-latency transport and precise sequencing, compelling suppliers to refine mechanical designs and software architectures for tighter tolerances.

Supply chain resilience initiatives and rising labor costs are prompting fabs to reconsider the balance between capital investment in automation and operational flexibility, while digital twin technology and high-fidelity simulation enable planners to validate layout alternatives and contingency plans before committing to hardware changes. Environmental and energy-performance targets are also reshaping system specifications, with energy-efficient drives, materials, and power management strategies becoming differentiators. As a result, the industry is shifting toward modular, service-oriented AMHS platforms that combine scalable hardware, cloud-enabled analytics, and standardized interfaces to support faster adoption and incremental modernization.

How recent tariff shifts have reshaped procurement calculus, supply chain localization, inventory strategy, and capital planning for automated material handling deployments

Cumulative tariff actions announced by United States authorities in 2025 have introduced new dynamics that influence procurement, manufacturing footprint decisions, and supplier strategy for semiconductor AMHS. Tariff-driven cost pressures have increased the scrutiny of sourcing decisions, prompting procurement teams to reevaluate total landed cost, supplier diversification, and the potential benefits of nearshoring or dual-sourcing arrangements. In response, some global suppliers have accelerated the localization of assembly and configuration capabilities to mitigate tariff exposure while preserving access to critical markets.

Operational teams have responded by revisiting inventory policies, buffer strategies, and spare-parts provisioning to reduce vulnerability to cross-border supply interruptions. Longer lead times for specific components have emphasized the value of modular designs and interchangeable subsystems that allow incremental upgrades without major capital expenditure. Meanwhile, capital planners have adjusted project timetables to accommodate potential customs delays and to optimize cash flow under revised duty structures. Regulators and corporate compliance functions now play a more active role, working with engineering and procurement to ensure that equipment certifications, country-of-origin documentation, and contractual terms reflect a more complex trade environment. Consequently, AMHS investment decisions increasingly factor in trade policy risk as a determinant of vendor selection and deployment phasing.

Targeted segmentation analysis linking system topologies, end-user priorities, wafer handling dimensions, and interface configurations to practical adoption pathways and performance trade-offs

Segmentation offers a focused lens for analyzing AMHS performance and adoption patterns across system types, end users, wafer sizes, automation levels, port configurations, and application scopes. When evaluating system type, consider automated guided vehicles alongside automated storage and retrieval systems, conveyor networks, and overhead transport solutions, and recognize that AGV variants such as laser-guided and magnetic-guided vehicles differ materially in navigation precision, infrastructure requirements, and cleanroom integration. From the end-user perspective, operational priorities diverge between foundries, integrated device manufacturers focused on logic and memory, and outsourced semiconductor assembly and test providers, each of which emphasizes different throughput, handling, and contamination control criteria.

Wafer size segmentation between 200 mm and 300 mm influences mechanical handling tolerances, carrier capacities, and throughput economics, while automation level choices between fully automated and semi-automated deployments reflect differing labor models, flexibility needs, and changeover expectations. Port type decisions-whether to specify front-opening shipping boxes, front-opening unified pods, open-front interfaces, or SMIF carriers-affect tool interface design, cleanroom handling procedures, and cross-equipment compatibility. Finally, application distinctions between inter-fab transportation and intra-fab sequencing highlight differences in route optimization, trackability requirements, and SLA-driven prioritization. Together, these segmentation dimensions enable stakeholders to align technology roadmaps with specific operational constraints and strategic objectives.

Regional deployment patterns and strategic differentiators that influence automated material handling system adoption across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific manufacturing ecosystems

Regional factors shape AMHS strategy through labor availability, capital intensity, regulatory regimes, and ecosystem maturity. In the Americas, semiconductor investment tends to emphasize reshoring, fabs with integrated capacity plans, and a growing emphasis on advanced packaging, which drives demand for flexible intra-fab transport and automation solutions adapted to high-mix environments. Supply chain diversification efforts in the region also encourage deployment models that prioritize modular upgrades and strong local service networks to minimize downtime risk.

In Europe, the Middle East and Africa, regulatory focus on sustainability and energy efficiency informs procurement criteria, and manufacturers often combine automation upgrades with retrofits that reduce facility energy footprints. The region's heterogeneous industrial base favors interoperable AMHS platforms that can adapt to diverse fab configurations and legacy equipment. In Asia-Pacific, established manufacturing clusters and high-volume foundry operations continue to push for throughput maximization, where 300 mm fab expansion and advanced packaging hubs drive demand for low-latency transport, deterministic routing, and high-reliability storage solutions. Across regions, differing capital cycles, workforce dynamics, and policy incentives determine the pace and form of AMHS adoption, making geographic strategy a central component of supplier go-to-market planning.

How suppliers are transitioning from hardware vendors to solution partners by integrating orchestration software, predictive services, and certified interoperability offerings

Leading suppliers and integrators are evolving their offerings beyond hardware to provide software-centric orchestration, analytics, and lifetime service models that de-risk installations and accelerate time-to-value. Many vendors now bundle edge control systems, factory integration middleware, and machine health analytics as part of a managed service proposition, enabling customers to shift from capital expenditure toward predictable operational expenditure models. Strategic partnerships between robotics specialists, control software providers, and systems integrators are increasingly common, as companies aim to deliver validated solution stacks that reduce integration complexity and shorten deployment timelines.

Innovation is also visible in aftermarket services where predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, and parts-as-a-service reduce unplanned downtime and extend equipment life. Competitive differentiation is emerging from firms that invest in open APIs, standards-aligned interfaces, and certified interoperability suites, which lower the technical risk for fabs with mixed-vendor toolsets. Additionally, firms that provide strong program management, migration planning, and training services tend to achieve higher long-term client retention, since successful AMHS deployments require organizational change management in addition to technical excellence.

Practical and prioritized recommendations for manufacturers and suppliers to strengthen resilience, accelerate integration, and maximize return on AMHS investments

Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable priorities that balance near-term throughput improvements with long-term flexibility and risk mitigation. Prioritize modular AMHS architectures that allow incremental capacity expansion and component substitution, thereby reducing exposure to tariff shocks, supplier disruptions, and design obsolescence. Invest in standardized software interfaces and digital twins to validate layout changes, test routing logic offline, and forecast throughput impacts before committing to capital expenditure. This approach reduces commissioning risk and accelerates ROI realization.

Operational teams should reexamine spare parts strategies and service contracts to improve resilience against extended lead times while negotiating vendor terms that include localization options for high-impact components. Engineering groups should pilot AI-driven routing and predictive maintenance on non-critical lines to build internal competency and demonstrate value before scaling across production. From a procurement perspective, diversify the supplier base to include regional assembly partners and certified integrators, and structure contracts to incentivize uptime and rapid spares fulfillment. Finally, align cross-functional governance-bringing together process engineering, operations, IT, and procurement-to ensure that AMHS projects are properly scoped, measured, and maintained over their lifecycle.

A robust mixed-methods research approach combining expert interviews, technical synthesis, case analysis, and cross-validation to ensure actionable and verifiable insights

The research underpinning this analysis combined a rigorous blend of primary and secondary inquiry, structured to validate technical trends, deployment modalities, and strategic responses. Primary research included in-depth interviews with fab operations leaders, systems integrators, automation engineers, and component suppliers to capture first-hand perspectives on implementation challenges, performance priorities, and future roadmaps. These conversations informed scenario development and clarified the operational trade-offs associated with different system topologies and port standards.

Secondary research synthesized publicly available technical literature, standards documentation, patent filings, and product specifications to map technology trajectories and supplier capabilities. In addition, case studies of recent AMHS implementations were examined to extract best practices for commissioning, integration, and scaling. Findings were cross-validated through expert workshops and peer review with independent automation specialists to ensure robustness. Throughout the process, emphasis was placed on verifiable technical factors and operational impact rather than speculative market sizing, and limitations related to evolving trade policy and regional incentives are noted as contextual variables that may influence adoption pathways.

Concise synthesis of why modularity, standards, and operational readiness determine successful automated material handling system outcomes in fabs

Automated material handling systems have moved from supporting cast to strategic infrastructure within semiconductor manufacturing. The convergence of advanced robotics, software-defined control, and supply chain realignment is reshaping how fabs manage throughput, contamination control, and changeover complexity. Decision-makers who integrate modular hardware, interoperable software, and resilient sourcing strategies will be better positioned to navigate regulatory shifts, tariff dynamics, and evolving process demands.

Looking ahead, the most successful deployments will pair clear operational objectives with phased implementation plans that mitigate risk through simulation, pilot testing, and vendor certification. Organizational readiness-training, governance, and cross-disciplinary alignment-remains a critical determinant of program success. In sum, AMHS investments that emphasize flexibility, standards-based integration, and predictive operations will unlock sustained performance improvements and provide a platform for future technology adoption in semiconductor fabs.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by System Type

  • 8.1. Automated Guided Vehicles
    • 8.1.1. Laser Guided Vehicles
    • 8.1.2. Magnetic Guided Vehicles
  • 8.2. Automated Storage And Retrieval Systems
  • 8.3. Conveyor Systems
  • 8.4. Overhead Transport

9. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Wafer Size

  • 9.1. 200 Mm
  • 9.2. 300 Mm

10. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Automation Level

  • 10.1. Fully Automated
  • 10.2. Semi-Automated

11. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Port Type

  • 11.1. Fosb
  • 11.2. Foup
  • 11.3. Open Front
  • 11.4. Smif

12. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Application

  • 12.1. Inter-Fab
  • 12.2. Intra-Fab

13. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by End User

  • 13.1. Foundry
  • 13.2. Idm Logic
  • 13.3. Idm Memory
  • 13.4. Osat

14. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Region

  • 14.1. Americas
    • 14.1.1. North America
    • 14.1.2. Latin America
  • 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 14.2.1. Europe
    • 14.2.2. Middle East
    • 14.2.3. Africa
  • 14.3. Asia-Pacific

15. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Group

  • 15.1. ASEAN
  • 15.2. GCC
  • 15.3. European Union
  • 15.4. BRICS
  • 15.5. G7
  • 15.6. NATO

16. AMHS for Semiconductor Market, by Country

  • 16.1. United States
  • 16.2. Canada
  • 16.3. Mexico
  • 16.4. Brazil
  • 16.5. United Kingdom
  • 16.6. Germany
  • 16.7. France
  • 16.8. Russia
  • 16.9. Italy
  • 16.10. Spain
  • 16.11. China
  • 16.12. India
  • 16.13. Japan
  • 16.14. Australia
  • 16.15. South Korea

17. United States AMHS for Semiconductor Market

18. China AMHS for Semiconductor Market

19. Competitive Landscape

  • 19.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 19.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 19.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 19.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 19.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 19.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 19.5. ABB Ltd.
  • 19.6. Applied Materials, Inc.
  • 19.7. ASM Pacific Technology Ltd.
  • 19.8. Brooks Automation, Inc.
  • 19.9. Daifuku Co., Ltd.
  • 19.10. Fanuc Corporation
  • 19.11. Hitachi High-Tech Corporation
  • 19.12. Intel Corporation
  • 19.13. JTEKT Corporation
  • 19.14. KION Group AG
  • 19.15. KLA Corporation
  • 19.16. KUKA AG
  • 19.17. Lam Research Corporation
  • 19.18. Micron Technology, Inc.
  • 19.19. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
  • 19.20. Murata Machinery, Ltd.
  • 19.21. NSK Ltd.
  • 19.22. Panasonic Holdings Corporation
  • 19.23. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  • 19.24. SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.
  • 19.25. SK hynix Inc.
  • 19.26. Teradyne, Inc.
  • 19.27. Tokyo Electron Limited
  • 19.28. TSMC
  • 19.29. Yaskawa Electric Corporation

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 13. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 14. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY LASER GUIDED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY LASER GUIDED VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY LASER GUIDED VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MAGNETIC GUIDED VEHICLES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MAGNETIC GUIDED VEHICLES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY MAGNETIC GUIDED VEHICLES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY CONVEYOR SYSTEMS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OVERHEAD TRANSPORT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OVERHEAD TRANSPORT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OVERHEAD TRANSPORT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 200 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 200 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 200 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 300 MM, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 300 MM, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY 300 MM, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FULLY AUTOMATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FULLY AUTOMATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FULLY AUTOMATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-AUTOMATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-AUTOMATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SEMI-AUTOMATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOSB, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOSB, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOSB, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUP, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUP, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUP, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN FRONT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN FRONT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OPEN FRONT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SMIF, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SMIF, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SMIF, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTER-FAB, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTER-FAB, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTER-FAB, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTRA-FAB, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTRA-FAB, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY INTRA-FAB, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY FOUNDRY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM LOGIC, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM LOGIC, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM LOGIC, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM MEMORY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM MEMORY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY IDM MEMORY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OSAT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OSAT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY OSAT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AMERICAS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. NORTH AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. LATIN AMERICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. EUROPE AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. MIDDLE EAST AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. AFRICA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASIA-PACIFIC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. ASEAN AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. GCC AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. EUROPEAN UNION AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. BRICS AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. G7 AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. NATO AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. GLOBAL AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 191. UNITED STATES AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 192. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 193. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY SYSTEM TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 194. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATED GUIDED VEHICLES, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 195. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY WAFER SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 196. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMATION LEVEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 197. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY PORT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 198. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 199. CHINA AMHS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MARKET SIZE, BY END USER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)