查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1923803

按车辆类型、聚合物等级、轮胎结构和分销管道分類的轮胎丁基橡胶市场—2026-2032年全球预测

Butyl Rubber for Tires Market by Vehicle Type, Polymer Grade, Tire Construction, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 182 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，轮胎用丁基橡胶市场价值将达到 50.3 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 52.5 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 73.8 亿美元，复合年增长率为 5.62%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 50.3亿美元
预计年份：2026年 52.5亿美元
预测年份 2032 73.8亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 5.62%

本文策略性地介绍了丁基橡胶内衬如何影响轮胎性能、供应链韧性和製造商在现代交通运输领域的竞争力。

轮胎产业目前正处于材料变革的关键时期，配方选择和供应链因素相互交织，共同决定轮胎的性能、耐久性和整体拥有成本。丁基橡胶因其不透水性、弹性和与不断发展的轮胎结构的兼容性，继续作为内衬材料发挥着至关重要的作用。消费者对更低滚动阻力、更高保气性和更长使用寿命的期望日益提高，这促使轮胎製造商和聚合物供应商制定更严格的规范，并加强彼此间的合作。

聚合物创新、数位化製造和不断变化的贸易趋势如何重塑轮胎丁基橡胶产业的供应链和产品策略

轮胎应用领域丁基橡胶的格局正因终端用户需求的变化而再形成，这需要材料创新、供应链重组和新的营运模式。聚合物化学的进步拓展了传统丁基橡胶以外的可行选择，溴化和氯化丁基橡胶在不渗透性、加工性和与现代混炼体系的兼容性方面展现出差异化的性能。这些技术变革使轮胎设计师能够针对不同的车辆细分市场设定特定的性能目标，同时优化生产效率。

对 2025 年关税对轮胎丁基橡胶供应链中的采购、供应商多元化和产品组合决策的影响进行详细分析。

2025年关税的实施标誌着轮胎製造商所用丁基橡胶的筹资策略、供应商选择和跨境物流迎来了一个关键转折点。进口成本的增加迫使下游製造商重新评估其供应商关係，仔细权衡现有低成本供应来源与多元化或本地供应商稳定性之间的利弊。因此，一些轮胎製造商加快了对替代供应商的资格认证，并考虑签署长期采购协议，以确保投入成本的稳定和持续性。

详细的細項分析展示了车辆类型、聚合物等级、分销管道和内衬应用如何影响供应商选择和配方策略。

细分市场分析揭示了价值链中不同的驱动因素和技术优先事项，这些因素指导投资和商业化策略。根据车辆类型，重型商用车、轻型商用车、越野车、乘用车和摩托车的需求模式和性能要求存在显着差异，因此需要定製配方和检验通讯协定，以满足不同的使用週期和监管要求。车队和原始设备製造商 (OEM) 的采购团队往往优先考虑重型车辆的耐久性和承载性能，而乘用车和摩托车市场则更注重滚动阻力和乘坐舒适性。

全面深入的区域洞察，涵盖美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的丁基橡胶供应韧性、管理体制和製造生态系统。

区域趋势对轮胎内衬用丁基橡胶的投资重点、合规策略和供应链设计起着至关重要的作用。在美洲，由于地理位置接近性主要轮胎製造商，且法规环境成熟，推动了对国内生产和供应商伙伴关係的投资，这些合作强调品质、可追溯性和可靠的服务水准。北美和南美的市场参与企业正在努力平衡本地生产的优势与多样化原材料来源和物流弹性的需求。

竞争考察和策略层面深入分析公司，揭示技术合作、供应保障和合约创新如何定义丁基橡胶市场的领导地位。

生产商和材料供应商之间的竞争日益凸显，其竞争优势不再局限于基本的生产能力，而是更注重应用领域的专业知识、技术合作和供应链的可靠性。领先的供应商正加大研发投入，致力于提升内衬的性能，重点关注气体渗透性、与相邻层的黏合性以及製程效率等，以缩短生产週期并降低废品率。这些投资通常与更紧密的客户参与模式相结合，例如共同开发配方，并在轮胎认证阶段提供在地支援。

针对製造商和采购经理的具体建议，旨在加强供应链韧性、加速聚合物创新并优化合约结构。

随着市场环境的变化，产业领导者可以采取有针对性的措施来保护利润率、加速创新并增强供应链韧性。首先，应优先考虑多元化筹资策略，将现有供应商与合格的区域合作伙伴结合，以减少对单一供应商的依赖，并提高应对关税造成的成本波动的应对力。同时，也应在研发週期中深化技术合作，以确保新产品牌号符合原始设备製造商 (OEM) 和售后市场的性能标准，并避免冗长的认证週期。

对混合方法研究途径的清晰解释，该方法结合了现场访谈、技术测试和供应链分析，以检验洞察和情境。

研究采用综合分析方法，结合多种定性和定量方法，以得出可靠且经三角验证的结论。主要工作包括对轮胎製造商和聚合物生产商的材料科学家、采购人员、产品工程师和供应链经理进行结构化访谈，以收集关于性能要求、认证障碍和采购政策的第一手观点。此外，还进行了实地考察和技术交流，以获得混炼和内衬製造工艺的第一手观察，并检验有关製程变异性和品管实践的论点。

摘要重点阐述了为什么整合材料创新、筹资策略和供应链韧性对于轮胎内衬未来的竞争力至关重要。

这份综合分析报告指出，市场正处于变革时期，技术差异化、供应链韧性和策略采购相互交织，共同塑造竞争优势。溴丁基和氯丁基橡胶材料的创新拓展了内衬设计的可能性，使轮胎製造商能够在满足更严格的性能和耐久性标准的同时，适应不断发展的汽车平臺。同时，贸易政策和关税的变化促使企业重新评估筹资策略，更加重视供应商多元化和区域产能发展，以确保生产的连续性。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 依车辆类型分類的轮胎丁基橡胶市场

  • 大型商用车辆
  • 轻型商用车
  • 越野
  • 搭乘用车
  • 摩托车

9. 依聚合物等级分類的轮胎丁基橡胶市场

  • 溴丁基
  • 氯丁基
  • 通常是丁基

第十章 依轮胎结构分類的轮胎丁基橡胶市场

  • 子午线轮胎
  • 斜交轮胎

第十一章 按分销管道分類的轮胎丁基橡胶市场

  • OEM
  • 替代品

第十二章 轮胎丁基橡胶市场（依地区分）

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 轮胎丁基橡胶市场（依组别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 各国轮胎丁基橡胶市场

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章：美国轮胎丁基橡胶市场

第十六章 中国轮胎丁基橡胶市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • ARLANXEO Holding BV
  • Bridgestone Corporation
  • China Petrochemical Corporation
  • ENEOS Corporation
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Fishfa Rubbers Ltd.
  • Formosa Synthetic Rubber（Ningbo）Corporation Limited
  • Gujarat Reclaim & Rubber Products Ltd.
  • JSR Corporation
  • Kraton Corporation
  • Kumho Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
  • LANXESS AG
  • LG Chem, Ltd.
  • Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
  • Reliance Industries Limited
  • Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
  • SIBUR Holding PJSC
  • The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
  • Tinna Rubber And Infrastructure Ltd.
  • TSRC Corporation
Product Code: MRR-7A380DA7C2C2

The Butyl Rubber for Tires Market was valued at USD 5.03 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 5.25 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.62%, reaching USD 7.38 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 5.03 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 5.25 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 7.38 billion
CAGR (%) 5.62%

A strategic introduction to how butyl rubber inner liners shape tire performance, supply chain resilience, and manufacturer competitiveness in modern mobility

The tire industry stands at a material inflection point where formulation choices and supply chain considerations converge to determine performance, durability, and total cost of ownership. Butyl rubber continues to play a critical role as an inner liner material due to its impermeability, resilience, and compatibility with evolving tire architectures. Rising expectations for lower rolling resistance, improved air retention, and longevity across vehicle classes are driving more exacting specifications and closer collaboration between tire makers and polymer suppliers.

As manufacturers respond to electrification, higher torque profiles, and regulatory scrutiny on safety and emissions, material selection becomes a strategic lever. Supply chains are under pressure from feedstock variability, logistical bottlenecks, and policy shifts, requiring procurement teams to balance technical requirements with sourcing flexibility. In this context, product development cycles are shortening and performance validation processes are intensifying, demanding reliable access to advanced butyl grades and consistent quality from upstream partners.

Consequently, stakeholders must read market signals across vehicle types, polymer grades, distribution channels, and specific application needs to align R&D investments with customer expectations. Enhanced testing protocols, closer OEM-supplier integration, and targeted supplier development programs are emerging as practical responses to ensure that inner liner materials meet future durability and performance benchmarks without compromising manufacturability or cost efficiency.

How polymer innovation, digitalized manufacturing, and evolving trade dynamics are realigning supply chains and product strategies in the butyl rubber for tires sector

The landscape for butyl rubber in tire applications is being reshaped by material innovation, supply chain realignment, and shifting end-use demands that require fresh operating models. Advances in polymer chemistry have expanded the practical options beyond conventional butyl, with bromobutyl and chlorobutyl grades offering differentiated performance on impermeability, processability, and compatibilization with modern compounding systems. These technical shifts are enabling tire designers to target specific performance outcomes for different vehicle segments while also optimizing manufacturing throughput.

At the same time, industrial digitalization and automation are changing how suppliers manage quality control, traceability, and production flexibility. Data-driven quality management and predictive maintenance reduce variability and enable faster qualification cycles for new grades. Parallel to these capabilities, circularity initiatives and tighter environmental standards are encouraging investment in more efficient production processes and in some cases the exploration of recovered feedstocks or improved scrap handling to reduce waste.

Geopolitical dynamics, trade policy adjustments, and a renewed focus on nearshoring are altering sourcing strategies, prompting both buyers and producers to diversify supplier bases and to create contingency plans that reduce single-source exposure. Together, technological, regulatory, and commercial forces are creating a more modular and responsive market where agility in product development and supply management is becoming a decisive competitive advantage.

Detailed analysis of the 2025 tariff impacts on sourcing, supplier diversification, and product mix decisions shaping butyl rubber supply chains for tires

The introduction of tariff measures in 2025 created a material inflection for procurement strategies, supplier selection, and cross-border logistics for butyl rubber marketed into tire manufacturing. Increased import costs pressured downstream manufacturers to reassess supplier relationships, weighing the trade-off between incumbent low-cost sources and the stability that comes from diversified or local suppliers. As a result, some tire makers accelerated qualification of alternate suppliers and evaluated longer-term sourcing contracts to stabilize input costs and ensure continuity.

Tariff-driven price reassessments also influenced product mix decisions, with procurement teams increasingly favoring polymer grades and supply agreements that offered the best balance of technical performance and landed cost optimization. Distribution channels experienced ripple effects as replacement part producers and OEMs responded differently to cost changes; OEM teams tended to prioritize secure supply and quality assurance, while replacement channel stakeholders focused on maintaining competitive price points for end users.

Moreover, the tariffs stimulated conversations about onshoring and capacity expansions in regions with established chemical manufacturing ecosystems. Where investment and regulatory conditions permitted, manufacturers explored local capacity build-outs or joint ventures to insulate their operations from trade frictions. In sum, tariff policy catalyzed a reappraisal of resilience and cost management practices across the value chain, with a pronounced emphasis on strategic sourcing, contractual protections, and supplier development.

Granular segmentation insights revealing how vehicle class, polymer grade, distribution channel, and inner liner application dictate supplier and formulation strategies

Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated drivers and technical priorities that guide investment and commercialization strategies across the value chain. Based on vehicle type, demand patterns and performance requirements vary significantly between Heavy Commercial Vehicle, Light Commercial Vehicle, Off The Road, Passenger Car, and Two Wheeler applications, prompting tailored compound formulations and validation protocols to meet duty cycles and regulatory expectations. Fleet and OEM procurement teams often prioritize longevity and load-bearing performance for heavy vehicles, while passenger car and two wheeler segments place more emphasis on rolling resistance and ride comfort.

When viewed by polymer grade, distinctions among Bromobutyl, Chlorobutyl, and Regular Butyl inform choices around impermeability, compatibility with cure systems, and processing characteristics. Bromobutyl offers advantages where rapid vulcanization and enhanced adhesion are required, whereas chlorobutyl provides a balance of processability and barrier performance for certain tire constructions. Regular butyl remains valuable for applications where baseline impermeability and cost efficiency are the primary constraints.

Distribution channel segmentation into Original Equipment Manufacturer and Replacement uncovers contrasting procurement dynamics. OEM channels demand rigorous qualification, traceability, and consistent batch performance, driving longer-term supplier engagement and technical collaboration. Replacement channels prioritize availability, competitive pricing, and broad geographic distribution to meet aftermarket demand. Finally, application-focused segmentation around Inner Liner underscores the material's central role in air retention and overall tire integrity, linking polymer selection directly to in-service performance and warranty outcomes.

Comprehensive regional insights linking supply resilience, regulatory regimes, and manufacturing ecosystems across Americas, EMEA, and Asia-Pacific for butyl rubber

Regional dynamics play a pivotal role in shaping investment priorities, regulatory compliance strategies, and supply chain design for butyl rubber used in tire inner liners. In the Americas, proximity to major tire manufacturers and a mature regulatory environment encourages investments in domestic production and supplier partnerships that emphasize quality, traceability, and service-level reliability. North American and South American market participants balance local manufacturing strengths with the need to secure diverse feedstock sources and logistical resilience.

In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and advanced standards for vehicle safety and environmental performance drive higher technical specifications and more robust qualification demands. This region's mature OEM base and stringent compliance environment incentivize collaboration on material optimization and lifecycle performance, and it often serves as a proving ground for alternative polymer grades and circular initiatives.

Asia-Pacific remains a significant axis of production, innovation, and demand, hosting large-scale tire manufacturing clusters and dynamic supply networks. Rapid vehicle fleet growth, expanding two wheeler markets in several economies, and regional supplier ecosystems create strong incentives for capacity expansion and technical partnerships. Across all regions, cross-border trade, regulatory alignment, and logistical infrastructure continue to shape where investments in polymer capacity and downstream compounding capabilities are made.

Competitive and strategic company-level insights showing how technical collaboration, supply assurance, and contract innovation define market leadership in butyl rubber

Competitive dynamics among producers and materials suppliers are increasingly defined by capabilities beyond basic production, emphasizing application-specific expertise, technical collaboration, and supply chain reliability. Leading suppliers are investing in R&D directed at performance enhancement for inner liners, focusing on aspects such as gas impermeability, adhesion to adjacent plies, and process efficiency to shorten cycle times and reduce scrap rates. These investments are frequently coupled with stronger customer engagement models that integrate compound co-development and onsite support during tire qualification phases.

Strategic partnerships and vertical integration have also emerged as pragmatic responses to feedstock volatility and tariff uncertainty. Some manufacturers prioritize long-term contracts with chemical feedstock providers and joint ventures to secure capacity, while others focus on flexible production lines capable of switching between bromobutyl, chlorobutyl, and regular butyl runs with minimal downtime. In parallel, service differentiation through technical support, enhanced testing capabilities, and supply assurance programs is becoming a competitive necessity rather than a differentiator.

At the commercial front, pricing models are adapting to incorporate risk-sharing clauses, indexed feedstock adjustments, and performance-based stipulations tied to compound consistency. These contractual innovations reflect a broader shift toward partnership-oriented supplier relationships that align incentives across the value chain and mitigate exposure to short-term market shocks.

Actionable recommendations for manufacturers and procurement leaders to enhance resilience, accelerate polymer innovation, and optimize contract structures in the supply chain

Industry leaders can take targeted actions to protect margins, accelerate innovation, and strengthen supply resilience as market conditions evolve. First, prioritizing multi-sourced supply strategies that combine established suppliers with qualified regional partners will reduce single-source exposure and improve responsiveness to tariff-induced cost shifts. This should be coupled with deeper technical collaboration during development cycles to ensure new grades meet OEM and aftermarket performance criteria without protracted qualification timelines.

Second, investing in modular production capabilities and agile compounding lines will enable rapid transitions between polymer grades and support short-run customizations for key customers. Aligning capital allocation with flexibility rather than pure scale can yield faster time-to-market for differentiated inner liner solutions. Third, companies should enhance contractual frameworks to include transparent feedstock pass-through mechanisms and risk-sharing arrangements that balance cost volatility across partners while preserving commercial relationships.

Finally, building internal capabilities in polymer testing, lifecycle assessment, and circular process validation will provide a competitive edge. These competencies allow manufacturers to substantiate performance claims, meet tightening regulatory expectations, and participate in circularity initiatives with credible technical evidence. Taken together, these measures create a resilient, innovation-ready posture that supports sustained commercial success in the butyl rubber for tires market.

Transparent explanation of the mixed-method research approach combining field interviews, technical testing, and supply chain mapping to validate insights and scenarios

This research synthesis integrates multiple qualitative and quantitative methods to ensure robust, triangulated conclusions. Primary engagement included structured interviews with material scientists, procurement leaders, product engineers, and supply chain managers across tire manufacturers and polymer producers to gather first-hand perspectives on performance requirements, qualification hurdles, and sourcing preferences. These conversations were complemented by site visits and technical exchanges to observe compounding and inner liner production processes firsthand and to validate claims related to process variability and quality control practices.

Secondary analysis encompassed a systematic review of publicly available technical literature, regulatory frameworks, and patent filings to map innovation trajectories and identify emergent polymerization techniques and additives relevant to butyl grades. Supply chain mapping employed trade flow analysis and logistics assessments to understand chokepoints, modal dependencies, and regional production capabilities. Material performance comparisons leveraged laboratory test result compilations and standardized test protocols to evaluate impermeability, adhesion, and processing characteristics across bromobutyl, chlorobutyl, and regular butyl formulations.

Throughout the research, findings were cross-validated using multiple sources and subjected to expert review to ensure that interpretations reflect operational realities and technical constraints. Where appropriate, scenario analyses were constructed to illustrate plausible outcomes from tariff shifts, supplier disruptions, or rapid adoption of alternative grades, with sensitivity to regulatory and regional variables.

Concluding synthesis emphasizing why integrated material innovation, sourcing strategy, and supply chain resilience are decisive for future competitiveness in tire inner liners

The collective analysis underscores a market in transition where technical differentiation, supply resilience, and strategic sourcing intersect to shape competitive advantage. Material innovations in bromobutyl and chlorobutyl grades are expanding design possibilities for inner liners, enabling tire manufacturers to meet more exacting performance and durability standards while adapting to evolving vehicle platforms. Meanwhile, trade policy shifts and tariff considerations are prompting a reassessment of sourcing strategies, with increased emphasis on supplier diversification and regional capacity development to safeguard production continuity.

Companies that align material development with robust qualification pathways and procurement strategies will be better positioned to capitalize on demand for higher-performance and longer-lasting tires across vehicle classes. Investments in modular production capabilities, deeper technical customer engagement, and enhanced contractual mechanisms will help firms navigate cost volatility and logistics uncertainty. Ultimately, the ability to integrate technical excellence with agile supply chain practices will determine which participants lead in delivering inner liner solutions that meet the dual imperatives of performance and resilience.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Vehicle Type

  • 8.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicle
  • 8.2. Light Commercial Vehicle
  • 8.3. Off The Road
  • 8.4. Passenger Car
  • 8.5. Two Wheeler

9. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Polymer Grade

  • 9.1. Bromobutyl
  • 9.2. Chlorobutyl
  • 9.3. Regular Butyl

10. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Tire Construction

  • 10.1. Radial Tires
  • 10.2. Bias-Ply Tires

11. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Distribution Channel

  • 11.1. Original Equipment Manufacturer
  • 11.2. Replacement

12. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Butyl Rubber for Tires Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Butyl Rubber for Tires Market

16. China Butyl Rubber for Tires Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. ARLANXEO Holding B.V.
  • 17.6. Bridgestone Corporation
  • 17.7. China Petrochemical Corporation
  • 17.8. ENEOS Corporation
  • 17.9. Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • 17.10. Fishfa Rubbers Ltd.
  • 17.11. Formosa Synthetic Rubber (Ningbo) Corporation Limited
  • 17.12. Gujarat Reclaim & Rubber Products Ltd.
  • 17.13. JSR Corporation
  • 17.14. Kraton Corporation
  • 17.15. Kumho Petrochemical Co., Ltd.
  • 17.16. LANXESS AG
  • 17.17. LG Chem, Ltd.
  • 17.18. Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.
  • 17.19. Reliance Industries Limited
  • 17.20. Saudi Basic Industries Corporation
  • 17.21. SIBUR Holding PJSC
  • 17.22. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
  • 17.23. Tinna Rubber And Infrastructure Ltd.
  • 17.24. TSRC Corporation

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY HEAVY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY LIGHT COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY OFF THE ROAD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY OFF THE ROAD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY OFF THE ROAD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER CAR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER CAR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER CAR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO WHEELER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO WHEELER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TWO WHEELER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY BROMOBUTYL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY BROMOBUTYL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY BROMOBUTYL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY CHLOROBUTYL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY CHLOROBUTYL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY CHLOROBUTYL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REGULAR BUTYL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REGULAR BUTYL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REGULAR BUTYL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY RADIAL TIRES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY RADIAL TIRES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY RADIAL TIRES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY BIAS-PLY TIRES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY BIAS-PLY TIRES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY BIAS-PLY TIRES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REPLACEMENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REPLACEMENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REPLACEMENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. AMERICAS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. AMERICAS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. AMERICAS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. AMERICAS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. AMERICAS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. NORTH AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. NORTH AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. NORTH AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. NORTH AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. NORTH AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. LATIN AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. LATIN AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. LATIN AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. LATIN AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. LATIN AMERICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. EUROPE BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. EUROPE BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. EUROPE BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. EUROPE BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. MIDDLE EAST BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. MIDDLE EAST BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. MIDDLE EAST BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. MIDDLE EAST BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. MIDDLE EAST BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. AFRICA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. ASIA-PACIFIC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. ASIA-PACIFIC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. ASIA-PACIFIC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. ASIA-PACIFIC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. ASIA-PACIFIC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. ASEAN BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. ASEAN BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. ASEAN BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASEAN BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASEAN BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. GCC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. GCC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. GCC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GCC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. GCC BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPEAN UNION BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPEAN UNION BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPEAN UNION BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPEAN UNION BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPEAN UNION BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. BRICS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. BRICS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. BRICS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. BRICS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. BRICS BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. G7 BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. G7 BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. G7 BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. G7 BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. G7 BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. NATO BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. NATO BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. NATO BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. NATO BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. NATO BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. GLOBAL BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. UNITED STATES BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. UNITED STATES BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. UNITED STATES BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. UNITED STATES BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. UNITED STATES BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. CHINA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. CHINA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY VEHICLE TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. CHINA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER GRADE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. CHINA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY TIRE CONSTRUCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. CHINA BUTYL RUBBER FOR TIRES MARKET SIZE, BY DISTRIBUTION CHANNEL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)