查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1931155

食品磷酸盐市场依产品类型、功能、形态和应用划分，全球预测（2026-2032）

Food-Grade Phosphate Market by Product Type, Function, Form, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 198 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，食品磷酸盐市场价值将达到 23.1 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 24.1 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 34 亿美元，复合年增长率为 5.68%。

关键市场统计数据
基准年 2025 23.1亿美元
预计年份：2026年 24.1亿美元
预测年份 2032 34亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 5.68%

权威概述了食品级磷酸盐如何在不断变化的配方、监管和永续性压力下支持产品性能和商业策略。

食品级磷酸盐是多功能成分，具有重要的缓衝、乳化、螯合、膨鬆和保湿功能，因此在各种加工食品和饮料中都不可或缺。这些化学盐有助于生产者获得稳定的质地、较长的保质期和理想的感官特性，同时也有助于加工商满足监管和食品安全要求。消费者期望的改变和监管力度的加大，显着提高了人们对原材料来源、纯度等级和供应链可追溯性的关注，迫使生产商重新评估其配料规格和供应商关係。

不断变化的消费者需求、日益严格的监管、供应链的韧性以及配料创新正在共同重塑全球食品磷酸盐市场。

食品磷酸盐市场环境正经历着变革，这主要归因于多种因素的共同作用：消费者偏好的转变、监管力度的加强、确保供应链韧性的需求以及配料科学的创新。消费者对更清晰的标籤和更天然的配料的需求日益增长，这给配方师带来了挑战：如何在不牺牲产品功能的前提下，减少人工添加剂的痕迹。因此，供应商正增加对特定应用技术支援的投入，并探索将低磷酸盐配方与功能性替代配料相结合的混合解决方案，以保持产品质地并延长保质期。

关税环境变化对食品磷酸盐相关人员筹资策略、促进国内产能和供应链韧性的影响

关税和贸易壁垒的实施对磷酸盐原料产生连锁反应，波及整个食品加工价值链，影响筹资策略、供应商组合和配方决策。当进口关税推高原料成本时，製造商通常会审查供应商合同，加快替代供应商的资格认证，并在某些情况下调整产品配方，以减少对受关税影响原料的依赖。这些因应措施需要时间和技术检验，因此，拥有灵活采购结构和强大研发能力的公司更能适应变化。

详细的细分市场分析揭示了应用特定需求、产品化学成分、功能作用和外形如何决定技术需求和供应商差异化。

细分市场趋势分析透过应用、产品类型、功能和形态，识别技术需求和商业性机会领域。在应用方面，需求涵盖动物饲料、烘焙食品、饮料、罐头食品、糖果甜点、乳製品和肉品等多个领域。每个细分市场对纯度、粒径和溶解度都有独特的要求，从而影响供应商的产品系列和技术支援服务。在产品类型方面，市场供应磷酸二钠、磷酸二氢钠、六偏磷酸钠和磷酸三钠，选择依据是pH控制需求、螯合强度以及与蛋白质和矿物质的相互作用。从功能性角度来看，磷酸盐作为膨鬆剂、乳化剂、螯合剂、膨鬆剂和保湿剂的作用，决定了配方师的优先事项以及供应商在加工和储存条件下必须满足的技术性能标准。在形态方面，颗粒状、液体状和粉末状的供应方式会影响剂量精度、操作便利性以及是否适用于自动化生产线或人工配料。

区域趋势和合规复杂性将影响美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的筹资策略、技术要求和供应链模式。

区域趋势对采购风险状况、监管合规义务、创新重点和客户期望的影响方式截然不同。在美洲，供应链往往强调规模、价格竞争力和与大型食品加工企业的整合，而管理体制和标籤规范则要求製造商提供透明的文件和一致的技术等级。在欧洲、中东和非洲地区（EMEA），监管标准、消费者偏好和物流基础设施的复杂组合导致了多元化的打入市场策略，这些策略强调可追溯性和减少掺假。某些次区域也往往更重视永续性指标。

供应商如何通过技术服务、品质系统、策略伙伴关係和永续性认证，在食品级磷酸盐领域建立永续的竞争优势

食品级磷酸盐生产商和经销商之间的竞争受多种因素驱动，包括产品纯度、技术支援能力、严格的法规遵循和商业性灵活性。主要企业透过投资品质保证、可追溯性系统和应用实验室来脱颖而出，这些投资有助于客户解决配方难题并加快产品上市速度。与下游食品製造商建立策略伙伴关係和共同开发项目，正成为确保特种级磷酸盐需求、并基于专有配方和检验的性能数据创造转换成本的重要机制。

采取切实可行的策略步骤，透过加强技术合作、实现采购多元化和协调一致的永续性倡议，保持业务连续性并掌握业界的优质机会。

产业领导者应采取多管齐下的策略，平衡技术卓越性、供应链韧性和负责任的采购，以有效应对当前复杂的市场环境。首先，透过投资应用实验室和合作研发项目，加强技术服务能力，实现快速配方调整和优化，从而降低客户风险并深化商业性关係。其次，透过对多家地理分散的供应商进行资格认证并建立紧急库存，实现筹资策略多元化，确保生产连续性，同时降低贸易政策变化和物流中断带来的风险。

我们采用混合方法研究，结合针对性的初步访谈、全面的二次分析和严格的检验，以提供可靠、可操作的研究结果。

调查方法结合了严谨的二手资料分析、有针对性的一手访谈和系统的资料三角验证，以确保获得可靠且可操作的洞见。二手资料分析查阅了技术文献、监管文件、贸易通告和上市公司资讯披露，以梳理产品化学成分、功能角色和合规框架。一手访谈对象包括原料供应商和食品生产商的采购经理、研发人员和法规事务负责人，旨在检验运作环境中实施过程中遇到的挑战、采购行为和绩效标准。

在不断变化的市场中，为了维持产品性能和合规性，相关人员需要整合技术要求、韧性需求和策略协调。

食品磷酸盐仍是技术上至关重要的成分，其作用远不止于成本，更关乎产品性能、保存期限和法规遵循。该行业正处于一个转折点，消费者对洁净标示的偏好不断变化、监管审查日益严格以及供应链的不稳定性，迫使供应商和製造商在性能、透明度和韧性之间寻求平衡。投资于技术伙伴关係模式、强化品质系统和灵活采购安排的公司，将更有能力应对关税衝击、物流中断和配方调整要求，同时确保产品完整性。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章调查方法

  • 研究设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查前提
  • 调查限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席体验长观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 市场进入策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会地图
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

8. 依产品类型分類的食品磷酸盐市场

  • 磷酸氢二钠
  • 磷酸二氢钠
  • 六偏磷酸钠
  • 磷酸三钠

9. 依功能分類的食品磷酸盐市场

  • 缓衝剂和乳化剂
  • 螯合剂
  • 膨鬆剂
  • 保水剂

10. 食品磷酸盐市场（依形式划分）

  • 颗粒
  • 液体
  • 粉末

第十一章 食品磷酸盐市场及其应用

  • 饲料
  • 麵包製作
  • 饮料
  • 罐头食品
  • 糖果甜点
  • 乳製品
  • 肉类

12. 各地区食品磷酸盐市场

  • 美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章 食品磷酸盐市场（依类别划分）

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

14. 各国食品磷酸盐市场

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

15. 美国食品磷酸盐市场

第十六章：中国食品磷酸盐市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Aditya Birla Chemicals
  • BK Giulini GmbH
  • Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG
  • Chengxing Group Co., Ltd.
  • EuroChem Group AG
  • FMC Corporation
  • Fosfa as
  • Guizhou Kailin Holdings（Group）Co., Ltd.
  • Haifa Group
  • Hubei Xingfa Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • ICL Group Ltd.
  • Innophos Holdings, Inc.
  • Israel Chemicals Ltd.
  • Ma'aden Phosphate Company
  • Nutrien Ltd.
  • OCP Group
  • PhosAgro
  • Prayon SA
  • Solvay SA
  • The Mosaic Company
  • Thermphos International BV
  • Tianjin Tiansheng Binhai Phosphorus Industry Co., Ltd.
  • Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-7B550E008D87

The Food-Grade Phosphate Market was valued at USD 2.31 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 2.41 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 5.68%, reaching USD 3.40 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 2.31 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 2.41 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 3.40 billion
CAGR (%) 5.68%

An authoritative overview of how food-grade phosphates underpin product performance and commercial strategy amid evolving formulation, regulatory, and sustainability pressures

Food-grade phosphates are multifunctional ingredients indispensable across a broad range of processed foods and beverages, where they perform critical roles such as buffering, emulsification, chelation, leavening, and moisture retention. These chemical salts enable manufacturers to achieve consistent texture, extended shelf life, and desirable sensory attributes while helping processors meet regulatory and food safety requirements. Given evolving consumer expectations and heightened regulatory scrutiny, awareness of raw material origins, purity grades, and supply chain traceability has risen significantly, prompting manufacturers to re-evaluate ingredient specifications and supplier relationships.

As product developers and procurement teams navigate reformulation pressures driven by clean-label trends and nutritional guidelines, food-grade phosphates remain a pragmatic tool, particularly when technical performance cannot be replicated by alternative natural ingredients without trade-offs. At the same time, sustainability considerations and upstream sourcing transparency are shaping commercial relationships and contract terms. This introduction sets the stage for a deeper exploration of structural shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation dynamics, regional variations, competitive behavior, and practical recommendations for industry leaders seeking to align technical performance with commercial and sustainability objectives.

How evolving consumer expectations, regulatory tightening, supply chain resilience, and ingredient innovation are collectively reshaping the global food-grade phosphate landscape

The landscape for food-grade phosphates is undergoing transformative shifts driven by intersecting forces: consumer preference evolution, regulatory tightening, supply chain resilience imperatives, and innovation in ingredient science. Consumers increasingly demand cleaner labels and natural-sounding ingredients, which pressures formulators to reduce perceived artificial additives without compromising functionality. Consequently, suppliers are investing in application-focused technical support and exploring hybrid solutions that combine reduced-phosphate recipes with functional alternatives to preserve texture and shelf life.

Regulatory bodies are also intensifying scrutiny around additive usage levels and labeling transparency, prompting manufacturers to refine use-level justifications and invest in compliance documentation. Meanwhile, global supply chain disruptions and logistics volatility have accelerated a move toward multi-sourcing strategies, localized production, and longer-term procurement contracts to mitigate exposure to raw material shocks. On the innovation front, research into more efficient phosphate production, purification methods, and low-impurity grades is enabling higher-value applications and differentiation based on technical service and quality assurance. Taken together, these shifts are reshaping supplier-customer relationships, elevating the importance of technical collaboration, and re-prioritizing resilience and sustainability alongside price and availability.

Strategic implications of shifting tariff landscapes on procurement, domestic capacity incentives, and supply chain resilience for food-grade phosphate stakeholders

The introduction of tariffs or trade barriers affecting phosphate inputs can have cascading effects throughout the food processing value chain, influencing procurement strategies, supplier portfolios, and formulation decisions. When import duties increase input costs, manufacturers often respond by revisiting supplier contracts, accelerating qualification of alternative vendors, and, in some cases, reformulating products to reduce reliance on tariff-impacted grades. These responses take time and technical validation, so businesses with flexible sourcing and robust R&D capabilities adapt more smoothly.

Tariffs also incentivize investment in domestic capacity where feasible, particularly for high-volume processors seeking to lock in supply and reduce exposure to cross-border volatility. In addition, compliance and administrative burdens increase as importers manage additional documentation, classification challenges, and customs processes; this often results in longer lead times and higher inventory holdings to buffer against delays. Trade policy shifts may also prompt strategic inventory rebalancing, with firms prioritizing core SKUs for onshore production and using tariff-affected imports for lower-priority or specialty applications. Ultimately, the cumulative impact of tariff measures is to raise the premium on operational flexibility, regulatory expertise, and collaborative supplier relationships that can absorb cost and lead-time shocks while preserving product quality and continuity.

Detailed segmentation analysis revealing how application-specific requirements, product chemistries, functional roles, and form factors determine technical demand and supplier differentiation

Segment-level dynamics illuminate where technical demand concentrates and where commercial opportunity resides across applications, product types, functions, and forms. Based on application, demand is distributed across Animal Feed, Bakery, Beverage, Canned Food, Confectionery, Dairy Products, and Meat Products, with each vertical imposing distinct purity, particle size, and solubility requirements that shape supplier portfolios and technical support services. Based on product type, markets are served by Disodium Phosphate, Monosodium Phosphate, Sodium Hexametaphosphate, and Trisodium Phosphate, with selection driven by pH control needs, chelation strength, and interaction with proteins and minerals. Based on function, the role of phosphates as Buffering Emulsifier, Chelating Agent, Leavening Agent, and Moisture Retention component determines formulators' priorities and the technical performance criteria vendors must meet under processing and storage conditions. Based on form, the availability of Granule, Liquid, and Powder presentations affects dosing accuracy, ease of handling, and suitability for automated production lines versus manual batching.

Taken together, these segmentation lenses reveal that demand intensity and premium positioning are not uniform; they vary by the technical stringency of end-use, the cost-sensitivity of the customer base, and the degree to which performance is measured against natural-ingredient alternatives. Suppliers that can align product-type chemistry with application-specific protocols and deliver form-factor convenience-while supporting functional claims such as moisture retention or emulsification-are positioned to capture higher-value relationships. Moreover, the capacity to offer tailored grades and joint-development programs strengthens customer retention where reformulation risks are high.

Regional dynamics and compliance complexities that shape sourcing strategies, technical requirements, and supply chain models across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific

Regional dynamics influence procurement risk profiles, regulatory compliance obligations, innovation focus, and customer expectations in materially different ways. In the Americas, supply chains often emphasize scale, price competitiveness, and integration with large food processing operations, while regulatory regimes and labeling practices steer manufacturers toward transparent documentation and consistent technical grades. In Europe, Middle East & Africa, a complex mosaic of regulatory standards, consumer preferences, and logistics infrastructure leads to differentiated market entry strategies and an emphasis on traceability and containment of impurities, with certain subregions placing higher weight on sustainability metrics.

In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid urbanization and rising protein consumption drive strong technical demand across dairy, meat, and beverage sectors, even as supplier landscapes vary from highly consolidated local producers to import-dependent processors. Across regions, cross-border regulatory alignment, logistics reliability, and local processing technology maturity shape how manufacturers balance centralized versus decentralized sourcing. Consequently, firms operating across multiple regions must maintain adaptive commercial models, region-specific technical dossiers, and flexible supply chains to meet varying compliance and performance expectations while optimizing cost and continuity.

How suppliers build durable competitive advantage through technical service, quality systems, strategic partnerships, and sustainability certifications in the food-grade phosphate sector

Competitive dynamics among producers and distributors of food-grade phosphates are driven by a mix of factors including product purity, technical support capabilities, regulatory compliance rigor, and commercial agility. Leading firms differentiate through investments in quality assurance, traceability systems, and application laboratories that help customers bridge formulation challenges and shorten time-to-market. Strategic partnerships with downstream food manufacturers and co-development programs have emerged as important mechanisms to lock in demand for specialized grades and create switching costs based on proprietary formulations and validated performance data.

Other competitive vectors include vertical integration into raw material supply chains, capacity expansions targeted at liquid or powder form factors, and targeted investments in lower-impurity processing to serve sensitive dairy and beverage applications. Companies that actively publish technical guidance, provide hands-on on-site troubleshooting, and offer tailored supply agreements tend to secure longer contract tenures. In parallel, sustainability reporting and compliance certifications are increasingly table stakes; organizations that can demonstrate reduced environmental impact across production and logistics gain a reputational advantage with large food producers and retailers who have public sustainability commitments.

Actionable strategic steps to strengthen technical partnerships, diversify sourcing, and align sustainability efforts to preserve continuity and capture premium opportunities in the sector

Industry leaders should adopt a multi-dimensional approach that balances technical excellence, supply chain resilience, and responsible sourcing to navigate current market complexities effectively. First, strengthen technical-service offerings by investing in application labs and collaborative R&D programs that enable rapid reformulation and optimization, thereby reducing customer risk and deepening commercial relationships. Second, diversify sourcing strategies by qualifying multiple suppliers across geographies and by developing contingency inventories, which limits exposure to trade policy shifts and logistical disruptions while preserving production continuity.

Third, prioritize transparent traceability and environmental stewardship by implementing third-party verification where appropriate and by documenting impurity profiles and life-cycle impacts; these measures enhance trust with downstream customers and support compliance. Fourth, negotiate flexible commercial terms such as rolling contracts or index-linked pricing that distribute cost volatility fairly across supply chains. Fifth, pursue targeted investments in forms and grades aligned with high-growth or technically demanding applications-such as liquid formulations for automated lines or low-impurity grades for dairy-to capture premium positions. By integrating these strategic moves, firms can align technical differentiation with operational resilience and sustainability objectives, strengthening long-term competitiveness.

A mixed-method research approach combining targeted primary interviews, comprehensive secondary analysis, and rigorous triangulation to deliver credible, practice-oriented insights

The research methodology employed combined rigorous secondary analysis, targeted primary interviews, and systematic data triangulation to ensure robust and actionable findings. Secondary analysis reviewed technical literature, regulatory documents, trade notices, and publicly available company disclosures to map product chemistries, functional roles, and compliance frameworks. Primary interviews were conducted with procurement leaders, R&D specialists, and regulatory affairs professionals across ingredient suppliers and food manufacturers to validate implementation challenges, sourcing behaviors, and performance criteria under real-world processing conditions.

Data triangulation reconciled qualitative insights with observed supply chain behaviors and regulatory trends to reduce bias and strengthen the credibility of conclusions. Quality assurance protocols included cross-validation of technical claims, consistency checks across interview transcripts, and review of documentation supporting functional performance. Where appropriate, scenario analysis was used to explore the operational implications of trade policy shifts and supply chain disruptions. This mixed-method approach prioritized practical relevance for decision-makers while maintaining methodological transparency and repeatability.

Synthesis of technical importance, resilience needs, and strategic alignment required for stakeholders to sustain product performance and compliance in a changing market

Food-grade phosphates remain a technically essential set of ingredients whose role extends beyond simple cost considerations to encompass product performance, shelf life, and regulatory compliance. The industry is at an inflection point where evolving consumer preferences for cleaner labels, intensified regulatory scrutiny, and supply chain volatility require suppliers and manufacturers to balance functional performance with transparency and resilience. Firms that invest in technical partnership models, enhanced quality systems, and flexible sourcing arrangements will be better positioned to manage tariff shocks, logistics disruptions, and reformulation demands without compromising product integrity.

Looking ahead, the most successful organizations will be those that translate technical competence into commercial value by offering solution-oriented services, regionally adapted supply strategies, and credible sustainability narratives. Operational investments in traceability, application development, and contingency planning will increasingly distinguish market leaders from laggards. This conclusion reinforces the need for strategic alignment across procurement, R&D, and regulatory functions to ensure that product performance, compliance, and business continuity are optimized concurrently.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Product Type

  • 8.1. Disodium Phosphate
  • 8.2. Monosodium Phosphate
  • 8.3. Sodium Hexametaphosphate
  • 8.4. Trisodium Phosphate

9. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Function

  • 9.1. Buffering Emulsifier
  • 9.2. Chelating Agent
  • 9.3. Leavening Agent
  • 9.4. Moisture Retention

10. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Form

  • 10.1. Granule
  • 10.2. Liquid
  • 10.3. Powder

11. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Application

  • 11.1. Animal Feed
  • 11.2. Bakery
  • 11.3. Beverage
  • 11.4. Canned Food
  • 11.5. Confectionery
  • 11.6. Dairy Products
  • 11.7. Meat Products

12. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Food-Grade Phosphate Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Food-Grade Phosphate Market

16. China Food-Grade Phosphate Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. Aditya Birla Chemicals
  • 17.6. BK Giulini GmbH
  • 17.7. Chemische Fabrik Budenheim KG
  • 17.8. Chengxing Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.9. EuroChem Group AG
  • 17.10. FMC Corporation
  • 17.11. Fosfa a.s.
  • 17.12. Guizhou Kailin Holdings (Group) Co., Ltd.
  • 17.13. Haifa Group
  • 17.14. Hubei Xingfa Chemicals Group Co., Ltd.
  • 17.15. ICL Group Ltd.
  • 17.16. Innophos Holdings, Inc.
  • 17.17. Israel Chemicals Ltd.
  • 17.18. Ma'aden Phosphate Company
  • 17.19. Nutrien Ltd.
  • 17.20. OCP Group
  • 17.21. PhosAgro
  • 17.22. Prayon S.A.
  • 17.23. Solvay SA
  • 17.24. The Mosaic Company
  • 17.25. Thermphos International B.V.
  • 17.26. Tianjin Tiansheng Binhai Phosphorus Industry Co., Ltd.
  • 17.27. Yunnan Yuntianhua Co., Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MONOSODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MONOSODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MONOSODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY TRISODIUM PHOSPHATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BUFFERING EMULSIFIER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BUFFERING EMULSIFIER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BUFFERING EMULSIFIER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CHELATING AGENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CHELATING AGENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CHELATING AGENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LEAVENING AGENT, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LEAVENING AGENT, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LEAVENING AGENT, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE RETENTION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE RETENTION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MOISTURE RETENTION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GRANULE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY LIQUID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY POWDER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY ANIMAL FEED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BAKERY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BAKERY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BAKERY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BEVERAGE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BEVERAGE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY BEVERAGE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CANNED FOOD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CANNED FOOD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CANNED FOOD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CONFECTIONERY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CONFECTIONERY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY CONFECTIONERY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DAIRY PRODUCTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DAIRY PRODUCTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY DAIRY PRODUCTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MEAT PRODUCTS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MEAT PRODUCTS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY MEAT PRODUCTS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. AMERICAS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. LATIN AMERICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. MIDDLE EAST FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. AFRICA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. ASIA-PACIFIC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. ASEAN FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. GCC FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. EUROPEAN UNION FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. BRICS FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. G7 FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. NATO FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. GLOBAL FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. UNITED STATES FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY PRODUCT TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FUNCTION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY FORM, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. CHINA FOOD-GRADE PHOSPHATE MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)