查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1985705

反钓鱼市场：依解决方案类型、组织规模、部署方式和产业划分－2026-2032年全球市场预测

Phishing Protection Market by Solution Type, Organization Size, Deployment, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 191 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，反钓鱼市场价值将达到 30.6 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长到 34.6 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 73.3 亿美元，复合年增长率为 13.26%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 30.6亿美元
预计年份：2026年 34.6亿美元
预测年份 2032 73.3亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 13.26%

我们认识到网路钓鱼防范措施是公司韧性的重要组成部分，因此我们采取了一项策略政策，将安全投资与营运重点和声誉维护重点保持一致。

网路钓鱼仍然是资料外洩、金融诈骗和相关人员信任丧失的主要驱动因素，凸显了建立一个简洁的、面向高阶主管的框架来协调网路安全、风险和业务目标的必要性。本文透过将威胁趋势与业务永续营运、客户信任和监管风险联繫起来，阐述了为何应将反钓鱼措施从战术性层面提升为董事会层面的优先事项。

科技的快速发展和攻击者的自动化正在改变网路钓鱼技术，迫使企业采用整合式、情报主导的防御措施。

自动化、生成技术的进步以及攻击面的不断扩大正在迅速改变网路钓鱼的格局，迫使各组织重新评估其对攻击手法和防御有效性的假设。攻击者现在将利用开放原始码情报 (OSINT) 进行高度精准的目标定位与自动化网路钓鱼宣传活动相结合，大规模收集凭证，同时保持高度个人化，从而提高了攻击范围和转换率。同时，合成媒体和深度造假技术的兴起使得攻击者能够以惊人的逼真度冒充高阶主管和可信供应商。

我们将评估近期关税调整和进口政策变化如何重塑采购计划、供应商经济效益以及反钓鱼工作的战略部署选择。

政策变化会影响硬体、软体和云端服务的经济效益，进而对网路安全专案的规划和采购决策产生连锁反应，近期国家层级的关税调整就是一个例证。针对网路设备和某些软体元件的进口关税和贸易措施的增加，可能会延长供应商选择週期，提高本地部署和混合解决方案的总拥有成本 (TCO)，并促使一些公司转向云端原生方案，以缓解资本支出波动。

以细分为主导的框架，将解决方案类型、部署选项、组织规模和行业特定风险因素与可操作的防御重点相结合。

精细化的细分观点能够明确哪些控制措施和投资能够产生最大的营运影响，首先从与网路钓鱼攻击链各阶段相对应的解决方案类型入手。基于这些解决方案类型，分析重点关注“DNS 安全性”，即在流量到达终端之前阻止恶意解析路径；“电子邮件安全”，即侧重于检测、过滤和收件人身份验证；“安全意识提升培训”，即通过持续学习和模拟练习来影响人们的行为；以及“Web 安全”，即保护用户免受恶意登录页面和基于浏览器的攻击的侵害。

区域威胁概况和细微的监管差异决定了全球市场的部署优先事项、供应商选择和特定语言的培训需求。

区域趋势塑造了威胁概况、监管预期和供应商生态系统，从而为客製化网路钓鱼防御创造了独特的需求和机会。在美洲，大规模的数位经济和巨额交易量推动了对电子邮件威胁情报、金融诈骗防范以及与身分识别平台整合的持续关注。同时，监管审查也促使人们对可验证的培训和事件报告能力提出了更高的要求。

我们着眼于竞争趋势和供应商差异化，提供深度整合、丰富的遥测数据和可操作的编配，以减少漏洞并加快事件遏制速度。

反钓鱼领域的竞争格局呈现出核心技术、託管服务和新兴人工智慧功能整合的趋势，供应商正寻求透过专家级遥测技术、深度整合和生态系统伙伴关係来实现差异化。领先的供应商致力于在邮件闸道、DNS解析器、Web代理和身分平台等多个层面提供可互通的多层防御，同时也提供事件编配，以缩短故障排查时间并加快遏制速度。

可操作的领导指导指南，使网路钓鱼防御与可衡量的业务成果、身分管理健康状况、供应商弹性以及协作事件回应保持一致。

产业领导者应采取系统性的方法，平衡技术控制、人性化的流程和第三方风险管治。首先，要定义以结果为导向的指标，将网路钓鱼防范与业务目标连结起来，例如减少凭证外洩事件和缩短平均遏制时间，并将投资与这些可衡量的结果而非单一功能集挂钩。

我们高度透明且务实的调查方法，结合了对高阶主管的访谈、检验的第二手资料和反覆的专家评审，从而得出可操作的建议。

本研究整合了一手和二手资料，对现代网路钓鱼风险及其缓解策略进行了深入分析。一手资料包括对安全主管、託管服务供应商和事件回应负责人的结构化访谈，旨在了解实际操作情况和实施过程中的权衡取舍。这些定性见解与监管指南、学术研究、供应商技术文件和公开的事件分析等二手资料进行交叉比对，以检验趋势并得出切实可行的应对措施。

一项明确且可操作的综合分析将反钓鱼措施定位为一项持续性计划，该计划结合了技术措施、人类韧性和采购安全措施，以保护公司的价值。

总之，反钓鱼不再是孤立的IT措施，而是需要策略协调、操作严谨和持续调整的多面向项目。攻击者自动化和合成社交工程的进步凸显了整合防御的迫切性，这种防御应结合技术措施、以身分为先的架构和人员韧性。同时，采购环境的波动和区域监管差异等外部因素也要求灵活的部署方案和合约保障措施。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 市场进入策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章：反钓鱼的市场解决方案

  • DNS 安全
  • 电子邮件安全
  • 安全意识提升培训
  • 网路安全

第九章：反钓鱼市场：依组织规模划分

  • 大公司
  • 中型公司
  • 小规模企业

第十章：反钓鱼市场：依部署方式划分

  • 云
  • 杂交种
  • 现场

第十一章：反钓鱼市场：依产业划分

  • 银行业、金融服务业及保险业
  • 政府/公共部门
  • 卫生保健
  • 资讯科技与通讯
  • 零售和消费品

第十二章：反钓鱼市场：按地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十三章：反钓鱼市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十四章 反钓鱼市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十五章：美国反钓鱼市场

第十六章：中国反钓鱼市场

第十七章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Abnormal Security Corp.
  • Barracuda Networks, Inc.
  • Cofense Inc.
  • Deepwatch Incorporated
  • DuoCircle LLC
  • EchoMark, Inc.
  • Fortra, LLC
  • ImmuniWeb SA
  • INKY Technology Company
  • IRONSCALES LTD.
  • LexisNexis Risk Solutions by RELX Group
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Mimecast Limited
  • Open Text Corporation
  • OPSWAT Inc.
  • Paubox, Inc.
  • PhishCloud Inc.
  • Proofpoint, Inc.
  • SlashNext, Inc.
  • Sophos Ltd.
  • SpyCloud Inc.
  • Trend Micro Incorporated
  • Trustifi, LLC
  • Trustwave Holdings, Inc.
  • Twilio Inc.
  • Virtru
  • ZeroFox, Inc.
Product Code: MRR-EB173946A137

The Phishing Protection Market was valued at USD 3.06 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 3.46 billion in 2026, with a CAGR of 13.26%, reaching USD 7.33 billion by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 3.06 billion
Estimated Year [2026] USD 3.46 billion
Forecast Year [2032] USD 7.33 billion
CAGR (%) 13.26%

A strategic orientation that frames phishing protection as an enterprise resilience imperative and aligns security investments with operational and reputational priorities

Phishing remains one of the principal catalysts for data breaches, financial fraud, and erosion of stakeholder trust, demanding a concise executive framing that aligns cybersecurity, risk, and business objectives. This introduction clarifies why phishing protection should be elevated from a tactical control to a board-level priority by linking threat dynamics to operational resilience, customer confidence, and regulatory exposure.

Organizations are encountering increasingly sophisticated social engineering campaigns that exploit human, technical, and supply chain weaknesses. Consequently, leadership must balance investments across prevention, detection, and response while ensuring security programs are embedded in product design, customer touchpoints, and third-party relationships. The need for coordinated metrics-covering time-to-detect, user susceptibility trends, and incident containment effectiveness-has never been greater for prioritizing scarce resources.

To be actionable, the introduction also sets the stage for cross-functional collaboration. Legal and compliance teams must map obligations and disclosure thresholds, human resources and communications must prepare playbooks for credential disclosure and reputational management, and IT must align identity and access controls with threat intelligence feeds. By providing this strategic lens, the introduction helps executives move beyond ad hoc defenses to a sustained program that reduces exposure and supports confident growth.

How rapid technological advances and attacker automation are transforming phishing tactics and compelling enterprises to adopt integrated, intelligence-driven defenses

The phishing landscape is shifting at pace due to advances in automation, generative technologies, and attack surface expansion, forcing organizations to re-evaluate assumptions about threat vectors and defensive effectiveness. Attackers now combine improved targeting from open-source intelligence with automated phishing campaigns that scale credential harvesting while remaining highly personalized, which increases both reach and conversion rates. At the same time, the rise of synthetic media and deepfake techniques enables adversaries to impersonate executives and trusted vendors with alarming believability.

As defenses evolve, so do attacker tactics. Multi-channel social engineering that blends email, SMS, voice, and web-based lures is emerging as the default mode of compromise rather than an outlier. This transformation reduces the effectiveness of single-point controls and elevates the importance of integrated detection that correlates behavioral anomalies across identity, endpoint, and network telemetry. In parallel, defenders are adopting more automated orchestration, leveraging machine learning to prioritize incidents and deploying adaptive training that uses real-world phish simulations to reduce user susceptibility.

Finally, regulatory and supply chain considerations are reshaping enterprise priorities. Organizations are increasingly required to demonstrate due diligence in employee training, incident response readiness, and third-party risk management. These pressures create an environment where strategic leaders must accelerate the integration of phishing protection into core business processes and governance frameworks to maintain trust and operational continuity.

Assessing how recent tariff adjustments and import policy shifts reshape procurement timelines, vendor economics, and strategic deployment choices for phishing defenses

Policy shifts that alter the economics of hardware, software, and cloud services can cascade into cybersecurity program design and procurement decisions, and recent tariff changes at the national level are one such influence. Increased import duties and trade measures applied to networking equipment and certain software components can lengthen vendor selection cycles, raise total cost of ownership for on-premises and hybrid solutions, and drive some enterprises toward cloud-native alternatives to mitigate capital expenditure volatility.

These dynamics affect procurement timing and contractual negotiations, often incentivizing vendors to offer more flexible subscription models, inclusive maintenance, and managed services as a response to buyers' sensitivity to tariff-driven cost fluctuations. As organizations adjust, security architecture choices are influenced by availability of vetted appliances, lead times for replacement parts, and the relative agility of software-defined controls versus hardware-based appliances. This, in turn, impacts the cadence of security upgrades and the prioritization of compensating controls to preserve resilience while supply chains normalize.

Moreover, tariff-induced supplier consolidation can narrow the competitive landscape, making vendor diversification strategies and interoperability standards more important than before. Enterprises are therefore encouraged to stress-test procurement scenarios, review contractual protections for price volatility, and consider hybrid deployment models that combine managed cloud services with on-premises gateways to balance control with cost efficiency. These measures help maintain operational security posture even as global trade policy creates short- to mid-term uncertainty in acquisition planning.

A segmentation-driven framework that maps solution types, deployment choices, organizational scale, and vertical-specific risk drivers to practical defensive priorities

A granular segmentation lens clarifies where controls and investments deliver the highest operational impact, beginning with solution types that each address different stages of the phishing kill chain. Based on solution type, analysis covers DNS Security which blocks malicious resolution paths before traffic reaches endpoints; Email Security which focuses on detection, filtering, and inbound authentication; Security Awareness Training which targets human behavior through continuous learning and simulated exercises; and Web Security which protects users from malicious landing pages and browser-based exploits.

Deployment models influence scalability, latency, and control. Based on deployment, the market is studied across Cloud offerings that provide rapid updates and global telemetry sharing; Hybrid configurations that combine cloud orchestration with local enforcement for latency-sensitive use cases; and On-Premises appliances that remain relevant where data residency, regulatory constraints, or bespoke integrations demand local control.

Size and organizational complexity shape program maturity and procurement behavior. Based on organization size, the analysis differentiates Large Enterprises with complex legacy estates and centralized security operations; Medium Enterprises that balance agility with the need for standardized controls; and Small Enterprises where resource constraints necessitate managed or embedded services.

Finally, industry-specific dynamics affect threat exposure and compliance posture. Based on industry vertical, the study examines Banking, Financial Services and Insurance where fraud and credential theft carry outsized financial risk; Government and Public Sector environments that prioritize data integrity and citizen services; Healthcare organizations that must protect sensitive patient data while enabling clinical workflows; Information Technology and Telecommunications where attacker reconnaissance can lead to supply chain compromises; and Retail and Consumer Goods that are exposed through customer accounts and transaction systems. This segmentation-driven perspective supports tailored defensive architectures and investment roadmaps.

Regional threat profiles and regulatory nuances that determine deployment preferences, vendor selection, and language-specific training needs across global markets

Regional dynamics shape threat profiles, regulatory expectations, and vendor ecosystems, producing differentiated needs and opportunities for tailored phishing defenses. In the Americas, large digital economies and high transaction volumes drive a persistent focus on email threat intelligence, financial fraud mitigation, and integration with identity platforms, while regulatory oversight accelerates demand for demonstrable training and incident reporting capabilities.

Across Europe, the Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization and data protection standards push organizations toward privacy-preserving detection and stronger vendor due diligence, even as geopolitical events and region-specific fraud typologies require contextual threat feeds and localized remediation playbooks. In contrast, Asia-Pacific exhibits rapid cloud adoption and a diverse vendor landscape, where heterogeneity in local regulations and language-driven social engineering tactics necessitate flexible multilingual training, regional telemetry aggregation, and scalable cloud-native protections.

These regional distinctions also affect supply chain choices and deployment preferences. Regions with strict data residency rules may favor on-premises or hybrid solutions, while highly connected markets move quickly toward cloud-managed services to centralize telemetry and reduce maintenance overhead. By understanding these regional variances, leaders can match program architecture to jurisdictional requirements, local threat patterns, and the maturity of vendor ecosystems, thereby improving both defensive efficacy and compliance alignment.

Competitive dynamics and vendor differentiation focused on integration depth, telemetry richness, and actionable orchestration to reduce susceptibility and speed incident containment

Competitive dynamics in phishing protection reflect a convergence of core technologies, managed services, and emerging AI-enabled capabilities, encouraging vendors to differentiate through specialized telemetry, integration depth, and ecosystem partnerships. Leading providers focus on delivering layered defenses that interoperate across email gateways, DNS resolvers, web proxies, and identity platforms, while offering incident orchestration to reduce triage time and accelerate containment.

Vendors that excel combine transparent detection logic with rich contextual telemetry, enabling security teams to tune policies and measure behavioral change over time. Strategic partnerships with cloud providers, identity vendors, and threat intelligence consortia broaden data sources and improve real-time detection accuracy. At the same time, a growing set of niche players emphasizes novel approaches such as targeted URL detonation, browser isolation, and context-aware user prompts to reduce click-through rates without impeding productivity.

Open integration and standards support become important differentiators as enterprises seek to avoid vendor lock-in and to operationalize threat intelligence across security stacks. In this environment, customers evaluate not only technical capabilities but also support models, roadmap transparency, and professional services that can accelerate deployment and customize the controls to industry-specific workflows. Ultimately, competitive success is determined by a vendor's ability to translate telemetry into prescriptive actions that reduce exposure and restore trust quickly after incidents.

Actionable leadership directives to align phishing defenses with measurable business outcomes, identity hygiene, supplier resilience, and coordinated incident response

Industry leaders should adopt a programmatic approach that balances technological controls with human-centered processes and third-party risk governance. Start by defining outcome-oriented metrics that link phishing prevention to business objectives, such as reduction in credential compromise incidents and improvement in mean time to containment, and then align investments to those measurable outcomes rather than isolated feature sets.

Next, combine layered technical controls-email authentication, DNS filtering, web isolation, and behavioral analytics-with continuous, role-specific awareness programs that move beyond annual training to adaptive, scenario-based exercises. Complement these controls with strong identity hygiene and modern access policies that reduce blast radius when credentials are compromised. In parallel, establish vendor diversification practices and contractual clauses that address supply chain resilience, pricing volatility, and interoperability requirements.

Finally, embed phishing readiness into broader crisis playbooks that include legal, communications, and customer-facing teams so that response actions are coordinated and reputational harm is minimized. Use threat intelligence to prioritize defenses against the most relevant tactics and make data-driven investments in managed detection or advisory services where in-house capabilities are constrained. These steps create a resilient posture that can adapt to evolving threats while aligning security activities to business risk appetite.

A transparent, practitioner-grounded research methodology that blends executive interviews, validated secondary evidence, and iterative expert review to inform practical recommendations

This research synthesizes primary and secondary evidence to create a defensible narrative about contemporary phishing risks and mitigation strategies. Primary inputs include structured interviews with security leaders, managed service operators, and incident responders to capture operational realities and deployment trade-offs. These qualitative insights are triangulated against secondary sources such as regulatory guidance, academic studies, vendor technical documentation, and publicly disclosed incident analyses to validate trends and surface practical controls.

Data was cleansed and normalized to highlight recurring themes across industries and deployment models, while expert validation sessions were used to test assumptions and refine recommendations. The methodology emphasizes reproducibility, with clearly documented definitions for key terms, control categories, and segmentation axes so that readers can apply the framework to their own environments. Where limitations exist-such as rapidly evolving tooling or proprietary telemetry models-the report calls out uncertainty and recommends incremental validation through pilot deployments.

Ethical considerations guided the approach to threat intelligence and exercise design, ensuring simulated phishing and telemetry sharing comply with privacy constraints and organizational policies. By combining practitioner experience with cross-disciplinary literature and iterative validation, the methodology yields insights that are practical, defensible, and directly applicable to decision-making cycles.

A decisive and actionable synthesis that frames phishing protection as an ongoing program combining technical controls, human resilience, and procurement safeguards to protect enterprise value

In conclusion, phishing protection is no longer an isolated IT control but a multifaceted program that demands strategic alignment, operational rigor, and continuous adaptation. Advances in attacker automation and synthetic social engineering increase the urgency for integrated defenses that combine technical controls, identity-first architecture, and human resilience. Simultaneously, external forces such as procurement volatility and regional regulatory variation require flexible deployment options and contractual safeguards.

Organizations that succeed will adopt outcome-driven metrics, invest in layered controls that interoperate across email, DNS, web, and identity systems, and institutionalize ongoing training and scenario rehearsal to reduce user susceptibility. They will also incorporate supply chain and vendor risk management into procurement decisions, ensuring that selection criteria account for interoperability, update cadence, and commercial flexibility.

Ultimately, strategic leaders who treat phishing protection as a continuous program rather than a discrete project will achieve stronger risk reduction and better alignment between security investments and business priorities. This report provides the analytic foundation and practical pathways to guide those leaders in prioritizing actions, selecting interoperable solutions, and embedding phishing resilience into enterprise governance.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Phishing Protection Market, by Solution Type

  • 8.1. Dns Security
  • 8.2. Email Security
  • 8.3. Security Awareness Training
  • 8.4. Web Security

9. Phishing Protection Market, by Organization Size

  • 9.1. Large Enterprises
  • 9.2. Medium Enterprises
  • 9.3. Small Enterprises

10. Phishing Protection Market, by Deployment

  • 10.1. Cloud
  • 10.2. Hybrid
  • 10.3. On-Premises

11. Phishing Protection Market, by Industry Vertical

  • 11.1. Banking Financial Services Insurance
  • 11.2. Government Public Sector
  • 11.3. Healthcare
  • 11.4. Information Technology Telecommunication
  • 11.5. Retail Consumer Goods

12. Phishing Protection Market, by Region

  • 12.1. Americas
    • 12.1.1. North America
    • 12.1.2. Latin America
  • 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 12.2.1. Europe
    • 12.2.2. Middle East
    • 12.2.3. Africa
  • 12.3. Asia-Pacific

13. Phishing Protection Market, by Group

  • 13.1. ASEAN
  • 13.2. GCC
  • 13.3. European Union
  • 13.4. BRICS
  • 13.5. G7
  • 13.6. NATO

14. Phishing Protection Market, by Country

  • 14.1. United States
  • 14.2. Canada
  • 14.3. Mexico
  • 14.4. Brazil
  • 14.5. United Kingdom
  • 14.6. Germany
  • 14.7. France
  • 14.8. Russia
  • 14.9. Italy
  • 14.10. Spain
  • 14.11. China
  • 14.12. India
  • 14.13. Japan
  • 14.14. Australia
  • 14.15. South Korea

15. United States Phishing Protection Market

16. China Phishing Protection Market

17. Competitive Landscape

  • 17.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 17.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 17.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 17.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 17.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 17.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 17.5. Abnormal Security Corp.
  • 17.6. Barracuda Networks, Inc.
  • 17.7. Cofense Inc.
  • 17.8. Deepwatch Incorporated
  • 17.9. DuoCircle LLC
  • 17.10. EchoMark, Inc.
  • 17.11. Fortra, LLC
  • 17.12. ImmuniWeb SA
  • 17.13. INKY Technology Company
  • 17.14. IRONSCALES LTD.
  • 17.15. LexisNexis Risk Solutions by RELX Group
  • 17.16. Microsoft Corporation
  • 17.17. Mimecast Limited
  • 17.18. Open Text Corporation
  • 17.19. OPSWAT Inc.
  • 17.20. Paubox, Inc.
  • 17.21. PhishCloud Inc.
  • 17.22. Proofpoint, Inc.
  • 17.23. SlashNext, Inc.
  • 17.24. Sophos Ltd.
  • 17.25. SpyCloud Inc.
  • 17.26. Trend Micro Incorporated
  • 17.27. Trustifi, LLC
  • 17.28. Trustwave Holdings, Inc.
  • 17.29. Twilio Inc.
  • 17.30. Virtru
  • 17.31. ZeroFox, Inc.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. UNITED STATES PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 12. CHINA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DNS SECURITY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DNS SECURITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DNS SECURITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY EMAIL SECURITY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY EMAIL SECURITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY EMAIL SECURITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SECURITY AWARENESS TRAINING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SECURITY AWARENESS TRAINING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SECURITY AWARENESS TRAINING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY WEB SECURITY, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY WEB SECURITY, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY WEB SECURITY, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE ENTERPRISES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE ENTERPRISES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY LARGE ENTERPRISES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL ENTERPRISES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL ENTERPRISES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SMALL ENTERPRISES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY CLOUD, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY HYBRID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ON-PREMISES, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ON-PREMISES, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ON-PREMISES, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES INSURANCE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES INSURANCE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY BANKING FINANCIAL SERVICES INSURANCE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SECTOR, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SECTOR, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SECTOR, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY HEALTHCARE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TELECOMMUNICATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TELECOMMUNICATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TELECOMMUNICATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL CONSUMER GOODS, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL CONSUMER GOODS, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY RETAIL CONSUMER GOODS, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. AMERICAS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. AMERICAS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. AMERICAS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. AMERICAS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. AMERICAS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. NORTH AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. NORTH AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. NORTH AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. NORTH AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. NORTH AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. LATIN AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. LATIN AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. LATIN AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. LATIN AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. LATIN AMERICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. EUROPE PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. EUROPE PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. EUROPE PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. EUROPE PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. EUROPE PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. MIDDLE EAST PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. MIDDLE EAST PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. MIDDLE EAST PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. MIDDLE EAST PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. MIDDLE EAST PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. AFRICA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. ASIA-PACIFIC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. ASIA-PACIFIC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. ASIA-PACIFIC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. ASIA-PACIFIC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. ASIA-PACIFIC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. ASEAN PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. ASEAN PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. ASEAN PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. ASEAN PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. ASEAN PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. GCC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. GCC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. GCC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. GCC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. GCC PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. EUROPEAN UNION PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. EUROPEAN UNION PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. EUROPEAN UNION PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. EUROPEAN UNION PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. EUROPEAN UNION PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. BRICS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. BRICS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. BRICS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. BRICS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. BRICS PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. G7 PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. G7 PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. G7 PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. G7 PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. G7 PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. NATO PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. NATO PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. NATO PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. NATO PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. NATO PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. GLOBAL PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. UNITED STATES PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. UNITED STATES PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. UNITED STATES PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. UNITED STATES PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. UNITED STATES PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. CHINA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. CHINA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY SOLUTION TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. CHINA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY ORGANIZATION SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. CHINA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY DEPLOYMENT, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. CHINA PHISHING PROTECTION MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRY VERTICAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)