查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
2017036

黏度指数增进剂市场：依聚合物类型、终端用途产业和应用划分－2026-2032年全球市场预测

Viscosity Index Improver Market by Polymer Type, End Use Industry, Application - Global Forecast 2026-2032
出版日期: | 出版商: 360iResearch | 英文 187 Pages | 商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

预计到 2025 年，黏度指数增进剂市场价值将达到 1.6307 亿美元，到 2026 年将成长至 1.7655 亿美元，到 2032 年将达到 2.5794 亿美元，年复合成长率为 6.76%。

主要市场统计数据
基准年 2025 1.6307亿美元
预计年份：2026年 1.7655亿美元
预测年份 2032 2.5794亿美元
复合年增长率 (%) 6.76%

在性能、监管和供应趋势的相互作用下，本研究揭示了黏度指数增进剂在润滑油配方中不断变化的战略重要性。

在性能预期、监管限制和供应链现实的相互作用下，黏度指数增进剂已成为润滑油配方中的核心要素。配方工程师们如今需要在剪切稳定性、低温性能和耐热性之间取得平衡，同时还要应对不断变化的燃油效率法规和电气化趋势。这一趋势进一步凸显了添加剂选择、整合工作流程以及供应商关係在整个润滑油价值链中的战略重要性。

聚合物化学的进步、监管压力和供应链重组如何重新定义黏度改进剂配方策略和商业化途径。

在技​​术创新、日益严格的法规以及不断变化的出行模式的推动下，黏度指数增进剂领域正经历着一场变革。先进的聚合物化学技术能够实现具有更高剪切稳定性和更宽温度适应性的配方，有助于同时实现看似矛盾的目标：提高燃油效率并延长换油週期。因此，这些技术进步正在重塑机油、齿轮油、液压油和工业润滑脂的配方策略，迫使研发团队重新评估添加剂组合和相容性矩阵。

2025 年美国关税措施对整个黏度指数增进剂价值链的供应商策略、库存管理实务和区域製造决策产生了哪些影响？

美国于2025年实施的关税措施的累积影响黏度指数增进剂生态系统的方方面面，从筹资策略和供应商网络到产品成本结构，无一倖免。面对关税带来的成本压力，采购商开始重新评估其全球采购体系，并寻找能够提供稳定聚合物品质且不会使其自身组织面临波动关税体系风险的替代供应商。因此，采购团队加快了供应商认证流程，并更加重视合约的柔软性和风险分担。

基于细分市场的详细洞察，展示了应用需求、聚合物化学选择和特定产业需求如何决定研发重点和供应商差异化。

基于细分市场的洞察揭示了应用需求、聚合物选择和终端用户产业趋势如何共同影响产品策略和商业性重点。机油、齿轮油、液压油和工业润滑脂等应用都需要优化的流变控制和剪切稳定性。在机油的开发中，商用车和乘用车的需求存在差异，导致不同的规格和测试方案。烯烃共聚物、聚甲基丙烯酸酯和苯乙烯-二烯共聚物等聚合物种类的选择会带来广泛的性能权衡，而苯乙烯-二烯共聚物的氢化状态则进一步影响其抗氧化性和热性能。

影响采购、检验和区域产品策略的美洲、欧洲、中东和非洲以及亚太地区的供需趋势。

区域趋势对黏度指数增进剂的需求和供应模式均有显着影响。在美洲，随着运输车辆和工业运营商积极响应排放气体法规和提高燃油效率的要求，终端用户优先考虑耐久性和法规合规性，这迫使供应商提供兼顾低温性能和长期剪切保持性的粘度指数改进剂。在欧洲、中东和非洲，复杂的法规和多样化的运作环境导致产品组合和区域技术检验要求的多样化，其中一些地区特别重视氧化稳定性和燃油效率的提升。

为什么技术领先地位、供应韧性和协作商业化决定了黏度指数增进剂。

黏度指数增进剂领域的发展趋势反映了技术深度、生产规模和商业化合作的融合。市场参与企业正加大对聚合物研发的投入，以提供针对特定应用客製化的黏度改进剂，例如商用车和乘用车引擎油、高性能齿轮油、工业设备液压油以及特殊润滑脂。透过将扎实的聚合物化学专业知识与严格的应用测试相结合，企业正在赢得原始设备製造商 (OEM) 和工业终端用户的信任，从而建立更强大的技术信誉。

为製造商和供应商提供切实可行的策略步骤，将技术诀窍转化为强大的供应模式，并实现所有应用领域的快速市场化。

行业领导企业可以透过采取一系列有针对性且切实可行的措施，将技术能力与商业性可行性相结合，从而将洞察转化为竞争优势。首先，将聚合物开发蓝图与特定应用领域（例如，商用车引擎油和乘用车配方之间的需求差异）相匹配，可以明确研发重点并缩短检验週期。其次，在建立技术转移协议和标准化品质指标的同时，实现供应商多元化，可以增强企业应对政策变化和原材料价格波动的能力。

采用严谨且多方面的调查方法，结合实验室评估、相关人员访谈和供应链分析，以检验聚合物性能和商业性趋势。

本分析的调查方法整合了技术文献综述、专有配方测试、供应链分析以及结构化的相关人员访谈，从而对黏度改进剂市场趋势进行了多角度的观点。此方法将聚合物化学知识与特定应用领域的性能指标相结合，以评估烯烃共聚物、聚甲基丙烯酸酯和苯乙烯-二烯共聚物的各种变体在其操作范围内的性能。实验室评估着重于剪切保持性、热稳定性和氧化稳定性以及与各种基础油的相容性，以反映实际应用中的限制。

最终总结强调了为最大限度地发挥先进黏度改进剂的性能和营运效益，必须采取综合技术、商业性和区域整合策略。

总之，黏度指数增进剂目前处于配方科学、操作要求和策略采购三个要素的交会点。聚合物化学的进步提高了剪切稳定性和温度适应性，但要实现这些优势，需要研发、采购和销售团队的协同努力。针对特定应用检验的聚合物平台和严格的现场验证至关重要，从商用车机油的独特要求到液压油和工业润滑脂的特殊需求，都应予以考虑。

目录

第一章：序言

第二章：调查方法

  • 调查设计
  • 研究框架
  • 市场规模预测
  • 数据三角测量
  • 调查结果
  • 调查的前提
  • 研究限制

第三章执行摘要

  • 首席主管观点
  • 市场规模和成长趋势
  • 2025年市占率分析
  • FPNV定位矩阵，2025
  • 新的商机
  • 下一代经营模式
  • 产业蓝图

第四章 市场概览

  • 产业生态系与价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
  • PESTEL 分析
  • 市场展望
  • 上市策略

第五章 市场洞察

  • 消费者洞察与终端用户观点
  • 消费者体验基准
  • 机会映射
  • 分销通路分析
  • 价格趋势分析
  • 监理合规和标准框架
  • ESG与永续性分析
  • 中断和风险情景
  • 投资报酬率和成本效益分析

第六章：美国关税的累积影响，2025年

第七章：人工智慧的累积影响，2025年

第八章 依聚合物类型黏度指数增进剂市场

  • 烯烃共聚物
  • 聚甲基丙烯酸酯
  • 苯乙烯-二烯共聚物
    • 氢化
    • 脱氢

第九章黏度指数增进剂市场：依最终用途产业划分

  • 车
    • 商用车辆
    • 搭乘用车
  • 工业的
    • 製造业
    • 发电

第十章黏度指数增进剂市场：依应用领域划分

  • 机油
    • 商用车辆
    • 搭乘用车
  • 齿轮油
  • 油压
  • 工业润滑脂

第十一章黏度指数增进剂市场：按地区划分

  • 北美洲和南美洲
    • 北美洲
    • 拉丁美洲
  • 欧洲、中东和非洲
    • 欧洲
    • 中东
    • 非洲
  • 亚太地区

第十二章黏度指数增进剂市场：依组别划分

  • ASEAN
  • GCC
  • EU
  • BRICS
  • G7
  • NATO

第十三章黏度指数增进剂市场：依国家划分

  • 我们
  • 加拿大
  • 墨西哥
  • 巴西
  • 英国
  • 德国
  • 法国
  • 俄罗斯
  • 义大利
  • 西班牙
  • 中国
  • 印度
  • 日本
  • 澳洲
  • 韩国

第十四章：美国黏度指数增进剂市场

第十五章：中国黏度指数增进剂市场

第十六章 竞争格局

  • 市场集中度分析，2025年
    • 浓度比（CR）
    • 赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数 (HHI)
  • 近期趋势及影响分析，2025 年
  • 2025年产品系列分析
  • 基准分析，2025 年
  • Afton Chemical Corporation
  • BASF SE
  • BRB International BV
  • Chevron Oronite Company LLC
  • Croda International Plc
  • Evonik Industries AG
  • Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • Infineum International Limited
  • Jilin Xingyun Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • Jinzhou Kangtai Lubricant Additives Co., Ltd.
  • LANXESS AG
  • Nanjing Runyou Chemical Industry Additive Co., Ltd.
  • Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.
Product Code: MRR-0315DDADCE1B

The Viscosity Index Improver Market was valued at USD 163.07 million in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 176.55 million in 2026, with a CAGR of 6.76%, reaching USD 257.94 million by 2032.

KEY MARKET STATISTICS
Base Year [2025] USD 163.07 million
Estimated Year [2026] USD 176.55 million
Forecast Year [2032] USD 257.94 million
CAGR (%) 6.76%

Framing the evolving strategic importance of viscosity index improvers in lubricant formulation as performance, regulation, and supply dynamics converge

The viscosity index improver landscape has become central to lubricant formulation as performance expectations, regulatory constraints, and supply-chain realities converge. Formulators now balance shear stability, low-temperature operability, and thermal endurance while responding to evolving fuel-efficiency mandates and electrification trends. This dynamic has elevated the strategic importance of additive selection, integration workflows, and supplier relationships across the lubricant value chain.

In practice, formulator decisions span a wide set of applications and performance windows. Engine oil development has bifurcated into segments that require distinct rheological and shear retention properties for commercial vehicles versus passenger vehicles, while gear oils, hydraulic fluids, and industrial greases each impose unique demands on polymer architecture and base oil compatibility. Concurrently, polymer designers focus on tunable chemistries, such as olefin copolymers and polymethacrylates, and on optimizing styrene diene copolymer variants through hydrogenation to improve oxidative stability and thermal resistance.

As formulators and buyers adapt, they prioritize not only additive performance but also supply resiliency, regulatory compliance, and lifecycle impacts. This introduction frames the subsequent analysis by emphasizing the interplay between application-specific requirements, polymer chemistry choices, and end-use industry pressures that collectively shape strategic decisions across R&D, procurement, and commercialization functions.

How advancements in polymer chemistry, regulatory pressure, and supply-chain redesign are redefining formulation strategies and commercialization pathways for viscosity improvers

The landscape for viscosity index improvers is undergoing transformative shifts driven by technological innovation, regulatory tightening, and changing mobility patterns. Advanced polymer chemistries now enable formulations that deliver improved shear stability and broader temperature adaptability, supporting the simultaneous goals of fuel efficiency and longer oil drain intervals. In turn, these technical advances are reshaping formulation strategies across engine oil, gear oil, hydraulic fluid, and industrial grease applications, prompting R&D teams to reassess additive packages and compatibility matrices.

Regulatory developments and emissions standards continue to pressure formulators to reduce frictional losses while maintaining protective performance. As vehicles transition along the electrification spectrum, passenger vehicle engine oil requirements diverge from those of commercial vehicles, creating differentiated demand for viscosity modifiers that balance low viscosity with film strength. Meanwhile, industrial users seek fluids that reduce energy consumption and extend equipment uptime, encouraging adoption of additives that deliver enduring rheological control under sustained shear.

Supply-chain evolution and raw-material sourcing also catalyze change. The sourcing strategies for olefin copolymers, polymethacrylates, and styrene diene copolymer derivatives are adapting to feedstock volatility and sustainability targets, provoking greater vertical coordination between polymer producers and lubricant manufacturers. As a result, commercialization timelines and partnership models are shifting, with strategic collaborations and targeted investments emerging as the primary routes to accelerate innovation and secure resilient supply.

How the 2025 United States tariff measures reshaped supplier strategies, inventory approaches, and regional manufacturing decisions across the viscosity improver value chain

The cumulative impact of the United States tariffs implemented in 2025 has reverberated across procurement strategies, supplier networks, and product cost structures within the viscosity index improver ecosystem. Tariff-driven cost pressures prompted buyers to reassess global sourcing footprints and to pursue alternative suppliers that could deliver consistent polymer quality without exposing organizations to volatile duty regimes. As a result, procurement teams accelerated supplier qualification processes and placed greater emphasis on contractual flexibility and risk sharing.

Tariffs also triggered supply-chain rerouting and inventory management changes. Companies shifted inventory policies toward buffer stocks and dual- or multi-sourcing approaches to mitigate delivery interruptions and duty rate fluctuations. At the same time, some polymer producers adjusted production schedules and regional allocations to optimize landed cost, prompting lubricant formulators to revisit compatibility testing timelines and validation protocols.

Beyond immediate transactional impacts, the tariff environment influenced strategic decisions about regional manufacturing investments, license agreements, and long-term collaborations. Firms evaluated reshoring or nearshoring options to reduce exposure to trade policy shifts, while others increased technical collaboration with domestic polymer chemists to develop functionally equivalent grades that minimized tariff liabilities. Collectively, these adjustments reinforced the importance of integrated commercial-technical planning and heightened the premium on flexible supply arrangements that enable rapid response to policy changes.

Deep segmentation-driven insights showing how application demands, polymer chemistry choices, and industry-specific needs determine R&D priorities and supplier differentiation

Segmentation insights reveal how application requirements, polymer selection, and end-use industry dynamics jointly influence product strategies and commercial priorities. Applications such as engine oil, gear oil, hydraulic fluid, and industrial grease each demand tailored rheological control and shear stability characteristics, and within engine oil development there is a further distinction between commercial vehicle and passenger vehicle requirements that drives divergent specifications and testing protocols. Polymer type choices - including olefin copolymers, polymethacrylates, and styrene diene copolymers - create a spectrum of performance trade-offs, and the hydrogenation state of styrene diene copolymers introduces additional variability in oxidative resistance and thermal behavior.

End-use industry segmentation likewise frames demand patterns and procurement behavior. The automotive sector, with its internal split between commercial and passenger vehicles, imposes fastidious OEM-driven specifications and long validation cycles, whereas industrial applications such as manufacturing and power generation prioritize durability, extended service life, and maintenance intervals. These distinctions affect purchasing cadences and technical acceptance criteria. Consequently, suppliers that can align polymer platforms to specific application windows while demonstrating reproducible field performance gain a competitive advantage.

Transitioning from segmentation to strategy, companies that integrate formulation science with application-focused testing and targeted supply strategies can better match product attributes to end-use expectations. This alignment reduces time-to-deployment for new additive grades and supports differentiated commercial offerings designed to meet the precise demands of diverse operator and OEM ecosystems.

Regional demand and supply dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that influence sourcing, validation, and localized product strategies

Regional dynamics significantly shape both demand patterns and supply-side behaviors for viscosity index improvers. In the Americas, end users emphasize durability and regulatory alignment as transportation fleets and industrial operators respond to emissions rules and efficiency initiatives, prompting suppliers to offer grades that reconcile low-temperature operability with long-term shear retention. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory complexity and diverse operating environments lead to differentiated product mixes and local technical validation requirements, with some regions placing a premium on oxidative stability and fuel-economy benefits.

Asia-Pacific presents a complex demand profile driven by rapid industrialization, a broad range of vehicle ages, and distinct performance expectations across markets. In many Asia-Pacific countries, growth in light vehicle ownership and expanding manufacturing capacity amplify demand for viscosity improvers that can be produced at scale, while local formulators seek cost-effective polymer solutions that meet regional climate and duty cycle conditions. These geographic nuances affect sourcing decisions, regional inventory strategies, and the prioritization of technical support resources.

As firms navigate regional differences, they increasingly adopt hybrid models that combine centralized product development with localized testing and customer support. This approach accelerates regional market entry and ensures that additive grades perform reliably under the specific operational and regulatory constraints present in each territory.

Why technical leadership, supply resilience, and collaborative commercialization determine competitive positioning among firms supplying viscosity index improvers

Company behavior in the viscosity index improver space reflects a blend of technical depth, manufacturing scale, and collaborative commercialization. Market participants increasingly invest in polymer R&D to deliver customized viscosity modifiers tuned for specific applications such as engine oils for commercial vehicle fleets or passenger cars, high-performance gear oils, hydraulic fluids for industrial equipment, and specialty greases. Firms that combine robust polymer chemistry expertise with disciplined application testing cultivate stronger technical credibility with OEMs and industrial end users.

Operational strategies vary: some organizations prioritize upstream integration and secure feedstock flexibility to stabilize production; others pursue strategic partnerships to access complementary formulation capabilities and testing infrastructure. In commercial terms, differentiation arises from the ability to provide engineered additive packages, technical field support, and co-development services that reduce adoption friction for formulators and end users. Additionally, supply-chain resilience, quality assurance protocols, and transparent compliance documentation increasingly serve as commercial differentiators.

Innovation pathways center on improving shear stability, enhancing low-temperature performance, and reducing environmental impact through longer service intervals and compatibility with emerging base oils. Companies that successfully marry technical performance with predictable supply and regulatory readiness position themselves to win longer-term contracts and to deepen relationships across automotive and industrial channels.

Practical strategic steps for manufacturers and suppliers to convert technical know-how into resilient supply models and faster commercial adoption across applications

Industry leaders can translate insights into competitive advantage by adopting a set of targeted, actionable steps that bridge technical capability and commercial execution. First, aligning polymer development roadmaps to specific application windows-such as distinguishing requirements for commercial vehicle engine oils versus passenger vehicle formulations-will sharpen R&D focus and reduce validation cycles. Second, diversifying supplier bases while establishing technical transfer protocols and standardized quality metrics will strengthen resilience to policy shifts and feedstock volatility.

Moreover, forging close partnerships with OEMs and industrial end users to co-develop additive solutions accelerates acceptance and shortens commercialization timelines. These collaborations should include shared testing frameworks and joint field trials to demonstrate performance under real-world duty cycles. Investing in regional technical support and localized testing facilities will ensure that product attributes meet climatic and operational conditions across distinct geographies.

Finally, embedding regulatory and sustainability considerations into product development-by assessing polymer hydrogenation choices, lifecycle impacts, and compatibility with evolving base oils-will future-proof portfolios and support stronger commercial conversations with buyers focused on long-term total cost of ownership. Taken together, these actions create a disciplined path from innovation to adoption and from procurement risk mitigation to differentiated market offerings.

A rigorous, multi-method research approach combining laboratory evaluation, stakeholder interviews, and supply-chain mapping to validate polymer performance and commercial dynamics

The research methodology underpinning this analysis integrates technical literature review, proprietary formulation testing, supply-chain mapping, and structured stakeholder interviews to provide a multifaceted view of the viscosity improver landscape. The approach synthesizes polymer chemistry insights with application-specific performance testing metrics to assess how olefin copolymers, polymethacrylates, and styrene diene copolymer variants perform across operational windows. Laboratory evaluation focuses on shear retention, thermal and oxidative stability, and compatibility with a range of base oils to reflect real-world constraints.

Complementing laboratory work, the methodology includes interviews with formulators, purchasing leaders, and end users across automotive and industrial sectors to capture decision criteria, validation expectations, and procurement behavior. Supply-chain analysis maps feedstock sourcing, manufacturing footprints, and logistical constraints that affect reliability and cost exposure. Regional assessments then contextualize technical findings within operational and regulatory frameworks found in the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific.

Triangulating these qualitative and quantitative inputs yields robust, actionable insights while ensuring transparency in assumptions and testing protocols. This layered method enables stakeholders to evaluate additive performance, supplier capabilities, and strategic trade-offs with confidence.

Final synthesis emphasizing integrated technical, commercial, and regional strategies needed to capture the performance and operational benefits of advanced viscosity improvers

In conclusion, viscosity index improvers now sit at the intersection of formulation science, operational exigency, and strategic sourcing. Advances in polymer chemistry deliver improved shear stability and temperature adaptability, but realizing these benefits requires coordinated action across R&D, procurement, and commercial teams. Application-specific demands-from the distinct requirements of commercial vehicle engine oils to the specialized needs of hydraulic fluids and industrial greases-necessitate targeted polymer platforms and rigorous field validation.

Policy changes, such as tariff adjustments, and regional market differences amplify the need for flexible sourcing, local validation, and supplier collaboration. Companies that pair technical leadership with resilient supply strategies and close customer partnerships will be best positioned to translate innovation into sustained adoption. By prioritizing integrated planning-linking polymer selection, application testing, regulatory readiness, and regional deployment-organizations can reduce adoption friction and capture long-term operational advantages.

Table of Contents

1. Preface

  • 1.1. Objectives of the Study
  • 1.2. Market Definition
  • 1.3. Market Segmentation & Coverage
  • 1.4. Years Considered for the Study
  • 1.5. Currency Considered for the Study
  • 1.6. Language Considered for the Study
  • 1.7. Key Stakeholders

2. Research Methodology

  • 2.1. Introduction
  • 2.2. Research Design
    • 2.2.1. Primary Research
    • 2.2.2. Secondary Research
  • 2.3. Research Framework
    • 2.3.1. Qualitative Analysis
    • 2.3.2. Quantitative Analysis
  • 2.4. Market Size Estimation
    • 2.4.1. Top-Down Approach
    • 2.4.2. Bottom-Up Approach
  • 2.5. Data Triangulation
  • 2.6. Research Outcomes
  • 2.7. Research Assumptions
  • 2.8. Research Limitations

3. Executive Summary

  • 3.1. Introduction
  • 3.2. CXO Perspective
  • 3.3. Market Size & Growth Trends
  • 3.4. Market Share Analysis, 2025
  • 3.5. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2025
  • 3.6. New Revenue Opportunities
  • 3.7. Next-Generation Business Models
  • 3.8. Industry Roadmap

4. Market Overview

  • 4.1. Introduction
  • 4.2. Industry Ecosystem & Value Chain Analysis
    • 4.2.1. Supply-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.2. Demand-Side Analysis
    • 4.2.3. Stakeholder Analysis
  • 4.3. Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4. PESTLE Analysis
  • 4.5. Market Outlook
    • 4.5.1. Near-Term Market Outlook (0-2 Years)
    • 4.5.2. Medium-Term Market Outlook (3-5 Years)
    • 4.5.3. Long-Term Market Outlook (5-10 Years)
  • 4.6. Go-to-Market Strategy

5. Market Insights

  • 5.1. Consumer Insights & End-User Perspective
  • 5.2. Consumer Experience Benchmarking
  • 5.3. Opportunity Mapping
  • 5.4. Distribution Channel Analysis
  • 5.5. Pricing Trend Analysis
  • 5.6. Regulatory Compliance & Standards Framework
  • 5.7. ESG & Sustainability Analysis
  • 5.8. Disruption & Risk Scenarios
  • 5.9. Return on Investment & Cost-Benefit Analysis

6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025

7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025

8. Viscosity Index Improver Market, by Polymer Type

  • 8.1. Olefin Copolymer
  • 8.2. Polymethacrylate
  • 8.3. Styrene Diene Copolymer
    • 8.3.1. Hydrogenated
    • 8.3.2. Non Hydrogenated

9. Viscosity Index Improver Market, by End Use Industry

  • 9.1. Automotive
    • 9.1.1. Commercial Vehicle
    • 9.1.2. Passenger Vehicle
  • 9.2. Industrial
    • 9.2.1. Manufacturing
    • 9.2.2. Power Generation

10. Viscosity Index Improver Market, by Application

  • 10.1. Engine Oil
    • 10.1.1. Commercial Vehicle
    • 10.1.2. Passenger Vehicle
  • 10.2. Gear Oil
  • 10.3. Hydraulic Fluid
  • 10.4. Industrial Grease

11. Viscosity Index Improver Market, by Region

  • 11.1. Americas
    • 11.1.1. North America
    • 11.1.2. Latin America
  • 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
    • 11.2.1. Europe
    • 11.2.2. Middle East
    • 11.2.3. Africa
  • 11.3. Asia-Pacific

12. Viscosity Index Improver Market, by Group

  • 12.1. ASEAN
  • 12.2. GCC
  • 12.3. European Union
  • 12.4. BRICS
  • 12.5. G7
  • 12.6. NATO

13. Viscosity Index Improver Market, by Country

  • 13.1. United States
  • 13.2. Canada
  • 13.3. Mexico
  • 13.4. Brazil
  • 13.5. United Kingdom
  • 13.6. Germany
  • 13.7. France
  • 13.8. Russia
  • 13.9. Italy
  • 13.10. Spain
  • 13.11. China
  • 13.12. India
  • 13.13. Japan
  • 13.14. Australia
  • 13.15. South Korea

14. United States Viscosity Index Improver Market

15. China Viscosity Index Improver Market

16. Competitive Landscape

  • 16.1. Market Concentration Analysis, 2025
    • 16.1.1. Concentration Ratio (CR)
    • 16.1.2. Herfindahl Hirschman Index (HHI)
  • 16.2. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, 2025
  • 16.3. Product Portfolio Analysis, 2025
  • 16.4. Benchmarking Analysis, 2025
  • 16.5. Afton Chemical Corporation
  • 16.6. BASF SE
  • 16.7. BRB International B.V.
  • 16.8. Chevron Oronite Company LLC
  • 16.9. Croda International Plc
  • 16.10. Evonik Industries AG
  • 16.11. Exxon Mobil Corporation
  • 16.12. Infineum International Limited
  • 16.13. Jilin Xingyun Chemical Co., Ltd.
  • 16.14. Jinzhou Kangtai Lubricant Additives Co., Ltd.
  • 16.15. LANXESS AG
  • 16.16. Nanjing Runyou Chemical Industry Additive Co., Ltd.
  • 16.17. Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.

LIST OF FIGURES

  • FIGURE 1. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 2. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SHARE, BY KEY PLAYER, 2025
  • FIGURE 3. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET, FPNV POSITIONING MATRIX, 2025
  • FIGURE 4. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 5. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 6. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 7. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 8. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 9. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2025 VS 2026 VS 2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 10. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • FIGURE 11. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)

LIST OF TABLES

  • TABLE 1. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 2. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 3. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY OLEFIN COPOLYMER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 4. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY OLEFIN COPOLYMER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 5. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY OLEFIN COPOLYMER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 6. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMETHACRYLATE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 7. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMETHACRYLATE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 8. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMETHACRYLATE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 9. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 10. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 11. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 12. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 13. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY HYDROGENATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 14. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY HYDROGENATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 15. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY HYDROGENATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 16. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY NON HYDROGENATED, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 17. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY NON HYDROGENATED, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 18. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY NON HYDROGENATED, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 19. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 20. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 21. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 22. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 23. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 24. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 25. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 26. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 27. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 28. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 29. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 30. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 31. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 32. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 33. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 34. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY MANUFACTURING, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 35. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY MANUFACTURING, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 36. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY MANUFACTURING, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 37. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 38. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 39. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POWER GENERATION, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 40. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 41. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 42. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 43. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 44. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 45. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 46. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 47. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COMMERCIAL VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 48. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 49. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 50. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY PASSENGER VEHICLE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 51. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY GEAR OIL, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 52. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY GEAR OIL, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 53. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY GEAR OIL, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 54. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRAULIC FLUID, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 55. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRAULIC FLUID, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 56. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY HYDRAULIC FLUID, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 57. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL GREASE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 58. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL GREASE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 59. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL GREASE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 60. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY REGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 61. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 62. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 63. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 64. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 65. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 66. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 67. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 68. AMERICAS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 69. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 70. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 71. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 72. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 73. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 74. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 75. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 76. NORTH AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 77. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 78. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 79. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 80. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 81. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 82. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 83. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 84. LATIN AMERICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 85. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY SUBREGION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 86. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 87. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 88. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 89. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 90. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 91. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 92. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 93. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 94. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 95. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 96. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 97. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 98. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 99. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 100. EUROPE VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 101. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 102. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 103. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 104. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 105. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 106. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 107. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 108. MIDDLE EAST VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 109. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 110. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 111. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 112. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 113. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 114. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 115. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 116. AFRICA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 117. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 118. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 119. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 120. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 121. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 122. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 123. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 124. ASIA-PACIFIC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 125. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY GROUP, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 126. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 127. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 128. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 129. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 130. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 131. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 132. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 133. ASEAN VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 134. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 135. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 136. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 137. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 138. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 139. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 140. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 141. GCC VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 142. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 143. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 144. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 145. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 146. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 147. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 148. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 149. EUROPEAN UNION VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 150. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 151. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 152. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 153. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 154. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 155. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 156. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 157. BRICS VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 158. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 159. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 160. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 161. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 162. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 163. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 164. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 165. G7 VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 166. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 167. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 168. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 169. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 170. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 171. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 172. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 173. NATO VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 174. GLOBAL VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY COUNTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 175. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 176. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 177. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 178. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 179. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 180. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 181. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 182. UNITED STATES VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 183. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 184. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY POLYMER TYPE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 185. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY STYRENE DIENE COPOLYMER, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 186. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY END USE INDUSTRY, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 187. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY AUTOMOTIVE, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 188. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY INDUSTRIAL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 189. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY APPLICATION, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)
  • TABLE 190. CHINA VISCOSITY INDEX IMPROVER MARKET SIZE, BY ENGINE OIL, 2018-2032 (USD MILLION)