Product Code: TC 7384
The Zero Trust security market size is projected to grow from USD 30.9 billion in 2024 to USD 66.6 billion by 2029 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.6% during the forecast period. As businesses shift to remote work and cloud technologies, cyber attacks become more sophisticated, and the market for zero-trust security is expanding quickly. The fundamental tenet of zero trust security is "never trust, always check," which implies that every person and device, regardless of location, must authenticate themselves before gaining access to any information. Numerous factors, including an increase in cyberattacks, a rise in cloud computing usage, an increase in remote labor, and more stringent data protection regulations, have made this strategy less visible. Zero trust is increasingly becoming essential for businesses to protect their sensitive data and systems in this digital age because hackers are always coming up with new methods.
Scope of the Report |
Years Considered for the Study | 2018-2029 |
Base Year | 2023 |
Forecast Period | 2024-2029 |
Units Considered | USD (Billion) |
Segments | By Offering, By Security Type, By Authentication Type, By Vertical, and By Region |
Regions covered | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East Africa, and Latin America |
"By Security Type , the Application Security will grow at a higher CAGR during the forecast period."
Zero trust security solutions are changing the traditional security model from a perimeter based to a risk based model that increases application security. These solutions have several key components to achieve this new security posture. For example, continuous authentication ensures only authorized users and trusted devices have access to applications regardless of location or network and reduces the risk of unauthorized breaches. Micro-segmentation creates isolated zones around applications and holds lateral movement and unauthorized access. Least privilege access reduces the attack surface and limits damage in case of a breach.The real-time monitoring driven by behavioral analytics and machine learning detects abnormal activity and responds to potential threats. Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is the foundation, allowing secure access to applications from outside the corporate network. The Identity and Access Management (IAM), encryption, application centric security, API security, user behavior analytics and compliance auditing all contribute to the comprehensive and adaptive security framework of zero trust solutions.
"By Offering, the Solution segment accounts for the largest market size during the forecast period. "
The zero trust market has become a must have defense against today's dynamic cyber threats. This new approach uses the "never trust, always verify" principle instead of the traditional perimeter based model. This reduces the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches making it a must have for businesses of all sizes. Advanced authentication, continuous monitoring and strict access controls are all part of zero trust, only authorized users wherever they are in the world can access critical resources. Zero trust solutions provide full network activity visibility so you can detect threats in real-time and respond to breaches quickly. By reducing false positives and automating security processes this proactive approach improves your business efficiency as well as your security posture. Zero trust is a resilient and flexible response to the ever changing cyber threat landscape, protecting your digital assets and keeping stakeholders trust in an increasingly connected world.
"By region, North America will have the largest market size during the forecast period."
The North American market, Includes US and Canada, is characterized by a high concentration of security vendors and a rise in cyberattacks. This sector may maintain a leading position in the zero trust security market for some time to come because of its early adoption of cutting edge technologies. The increase in sophisticated cyberattacks is one of the key factors driving businesses to implement zero trust security solutions. The increasing usage of IoT, digital payments, cloud-based apps, and OT, as well as industries including banking, finance, government, and healthcare, the region is now more susceptible to cyberattacks.This was demonstrated in the January MailChimp attack, where hackers gained unauthorized access and affected a significant number of users by using social engineering techniques. These kinds of incidents emphasize how important it is to have a zero-trust policy, which may effectively stop escalations and restrict lateral movement within networks.
Breakdown of primaries:
In-depth interviews were conducted with Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), marketing directors, other innovation and technology directors, and executives from various key organizations operating in the Zero Trust security market.
- By company type: Tier 1: 40%, Tier 2: 35%, and Tier 3: 25%
- By designation: C-level: 45%, Directors 35%, and Other Managers: 20%
- By Region: North America: 35%, Asia Pacific: 30%, Europe: 25%, MEA :5% and latin America :5%
Major vendors in the global Zero Trust security market include Palo Alto Networks(US), VMware(US), Zscaler(US), Akamai(US), Microsoft(US), Cisco(US), IBM(US), Qnext(US), Citrix(US), Checkpoint(Israel), Trellix(US), Forcepoint(US), Crowdstrike(US), Cloudflare(US), Fortinet(US), and Google(US). The study includes an in-depth competitive analysis of the key Zero Trust security market players, their company profiles, recent developments, and key market strategies.
Research Coverage
The report comprehensively segments the Zero Trust security market. It provides forecasts regarding its size across various dimensions, including Offering(solutions, services),Security Type (Network Security,Application Security, Cloud Security, Data Security, Endpoint Secuerity and IOT security), Authentication Type (Single factor Authentication, Multi factor Authentication ),vertical (BFSI, Government and Defense, Healthcare, Retail&Ecommerce, IT&ITES, Energy and utilities other verticals), and region (North America, Europe, Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific, and Latin America).
Additionally, the study encompasses a thorough competitive analysis of key market players, offering insights into their company profiles, product and business offerings, recent developments, and key market strategies.
Key benefits of buying report
The report offers market leaders and new entrants valuable insights by providing close approximations of revenue figures for the overall Zero Trust security market and its subsegments. Stakeholders can leverage this report to understand the competitive landscape better, enabling them to position their businesses more effectively and develop tailored go-to-market strategies. Additionally, stakeholders can grasp the market dynamics and stay informed about key drivers, restraints, challenges, and opportunities shaping the industry landscape.
The report provides insights on the following pointers:
- Analysis of critical drivers (Rapid adoption of cloud and surge in digital transformation
), restraints (Presence of legacy systems and compatibility issues), opportunities (mproved visibility into networks and robust security, and challenges Weakening of established security perimeters)
- Product Development/Innovation: Detailed insights on upcoming technologies, research development activities, new products, and service launches in the Zero Trust Security market.
- Market Development: Comprehensive information about lucrative markets - the report analyses the Security market across varied regions.
- Market Diversification: Exhaustive information about new products and services, untapped geographies, recent developments, and investments in the Zero Trust security market.
- Competitive Assessment: In-depth assessment of market shares, growth strategies, and service offerings of leading players Palo Alto Networks(US), VMware(US), Zscaler(US), Akamai(US), Microsoft(US), Cisco(US), IBM(US), Qnext(US), Citrix(US), Checkpoint(Israel), Trellix(US), Forcepoint(US), Crowdstrike(US), Cloudflare(US), Fortinet(US), and Google(US) are some of the key players operating in the global Zero Trust Security among others, in the Zero Trust security market strategies.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
- 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVES
- 1.2 MARKET DEFINITION
- 1.3 STUDY SCOPE
- 1.3.1 MARKET SEGMENTATION
- 1.3.2 INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
- 1.3.3 YEARS CONSIDERED
- 1.4 CURRENCY CONSIDERED
- 1.5 STAKEHOLDERS
- 1.6 SUMMARY OF CHANGES
2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 2.1 RESEARCH DATA
- 2.1.1 SECONDARY DATA
- 2.1.2 PRIMARY DATA
- 2.1.2.1 Breakup of primary profiles
- 2.1.2.2 Key industry insights
- 2.2 MARKET BREAKUP AND DATA TRIANGULATION
- 2.3 MARKET SIZE ESTIMATION
- 2.3.1 TOP-DOWN APPROACH
- 2.3.2 BOTTOM-UP APPROACH
- 2.4 MARKET FORECAST
- 2.5 RESEARCH ASSUMPTIONS
- 2.6 RESEARCH LIMITATIONS
3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4 PREMIUM INSIGHTS
- 4.1 ATTRACTIVE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS IN ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET
- 4.2 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY OFFERING, 2024-2029
- 4.3 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY APPLICATION, 2024-2029
- 4.4 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY SECURITY TYPE, 2024-2029
- 4.5 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY AUTHENTICATION TYPE, 2024-2029
- 4.6 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY VERTICAL, 2024-2029
- 4.7 MARKET INVESTMENT SCENARIO
5 MARKET OVERVIEW AND INDUSTRY TRENDS
- 5.1 INTRODUCTION
- 5.2 EVOLUTION OF ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET: COMPREHENSIVE HISTORY AND OUTLOOK
- 5.3 MARKET DYNAMICS
- 5.3.1 DRIVERS
- 5.3.1.1 Rapid adoption of cloud and surge in digital transformation
- 5.3.1.2 Rising regulatory compliance demands
- 5.3.1.3 Diminishing popularity of perimeter-based security
- 5.3.1.4 Rising threat of sophisticated cyberattacks
- 5.3.2 RESTRAINTS
- 5.3.2.1 Complexity and costly implementation
- 5.3.2.2 Presence of legacy systems and compatibility issues
- 5.3.2.3 Organizational resistance to change
- 5.3.3 OPPORTUNITIES
- 5.3.3.1 Improved visibility into networks and robust security
- 5.3.3.2 Development of new zero trust security products and services
- 5.3.3.3 Surge in awareness about zero trust security
- 5.3.4 CHALLENGES
- 5.3.4.1 Weakening of established security perimeters
- 5.3.4.2 Growth of shadow SaaS applications
- 5.3.4.3 Digital supply chain vulnerability
- 5.3.4.4 Fragmented security operations and siloed teams
- 5.4 IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET
- 5.4.1 TOP USE CASES AND MARKET POTENTIAL
- 5.4.2 IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AI ON INTERCONNECTED AND ADJACENT ECOSYSTEMS
- 5.4.2.1 Identity and access management (IAM)
- 5.4.2.2 Blockchain
- 5.4.2.3 Internet of Things (IoT)
- 5.4.2.4 Security information and event management (SIEM)
- 5.4.2.5 Behavioral analytics
- 5.5 CASE STUDY ANALYSIS
- 5.5.1 CASE STUDY 1: MICRON TECHNOLOGY ENHANCES SECURITY AND OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY THROUGH ZSCALER'S ZERO TRUST SOLUTIONS
- 5.5.2 CASE STUDY 2: DZ BANK ENHANCES ZERO TRUST SECURITY AND COMPLIANCE WITH CYBERARK INTEGRATION
- 5.5.3 CASE STUDY 3: WEALDEN DISTRICT COUNCIL ENHANCES CONNECTIVITY AND SECURITY WITH PALO ALTO NETWORKS SASE SOLUTION
- 5.5.4 CASE STUDY 4: DELOITTE'S CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION HELPED MAJOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION ACHIEVE ZERO TRUST ARCHITECTURE
- 5.5.5 CASE STUDY 5: ARRIVAL ENHANCED ITS INTERNAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY WITH CLOUDFLARE'S ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS
- 5.5.6 CASE STUDY 6: CISCO HELPED VICTORIA UNIVERSITY ENHANCE CAMPUS SECURITY WITH ZERO TRUST SECURITY SOLUTIONS
- 5.6 VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS
- 5.6.1 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
- 5.6.2 SOLUTION PROVIDERS
- 5.6.3 INTEGRATION AND DEPLOYMENT
- 5.6.3.1 Managed security service providers
- 5.6.3.2 Training and education providers
- 5.6.4 COMPLIANCE AND AUDITING
- 5.6.5 END USERS
- 5.7 ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS
- 5.8 PORTER'S FIVE FORCES ANALYSIS
- 5.8.1 THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS
- 5.8.2 BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
- 5.8.3 BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
- 5.8.4 THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES
- 5.8.5 INTENSITY OF COMPETITIVE RIVALRY
- 5.9 PRICING ANALYSIS
- 5.9.1 AVERAGE SELLING PRICE TREND OF KEY PLAYERS, BY AUTHENTICATION TYPE
- 5.9.2 INDICATIVE PRICING ANALYSIS, BY OFFERING
- 5.10 TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS
- 5.10.1 KEY TECHNOLOGIES
- 5.10.1.1 Identity and access management (IAM)
- 5.10.1.2 Cloud access security brokers (CASBs)
- 5.10.2 COMPLEMENTARY TECHNOLOGIES
- 5.10.2.1 Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- 5.10.2.2 Endpoint detection and response (EDR)
- 5.10.3 ADJACENT TECHNOLOGIES
- 5.10.3.1 Internet of Things (IoT)
- 5.10.3.2 Blockchain
- 5.10.3.3 Artificial intelligence
- 5.11 PATENT ANALYSIS
- 5.12 TRENDS AND DISRUPTIONS IMPACTING CUSTOMER BUSINESS
- 5.13 TECHNOLOGY ROADMAP
- 5.14 KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND BUYING CRITERIA
- 5.14.1 KEY STAKEHOLDERS IN BUYING PROCESS
- 5.14.2 BUYING CRITERIA
- 5.15 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
- 5.15.1 PAYMENT CARD INDUSTRY DATA SECURITY STANDARD (PCI-DSS)
- 5.15.2 GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION (GDPR)
- 5.15.3 CALIFORNIA CONSUMER PRIVACY ACT (CCPA)
- 5.15.4 GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT OF 1999 (GLBA)
- 5.15.5 PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION AND ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS ACT (PIPEDA)
- 5.15.6 HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA)
- 5.15.7 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION (ISO) STANDARD 27001
- 5.15.8 REGULATORY BODIES, GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, AND OTHER ORGANIZATIONS
- 5.16 KEY CONFERENCES AND EVENTS, 2024-2025
- 5.17 BUSINESS MODEL
- 5.18 INVESTMENT AND FUNDING SCENARIO
6 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY OFFERING
- 6.1 INTRODUCTION
- 6.1.1 OFFERINGS: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 6.2 SOLUTIONS
- 6.2.1 FOCUS ON OPTIMIZING OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY WITH ZERO TRUST SECURITY SOLUTIONS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 6.2.2 IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (IAM)
- 6.2.3 MICRO-SEGMENTATION
- 6.2.4 ZERO TRUST NETWORK ACCESS (ZTNA)
- 6.2.5 ZERO TRUST DATA ACCESS (ZTDA)
- 6.2.6 SECURITY INFORMATION AND EVENT MANAGEMENT (SIEM)
- 6.2.7 USER AND ENTITY BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS (UEBA)
- 6.2.8 POLICY MANAGEMENT
- 6.2.9 OTHER SOLUTION TYPES
- 6.3 SERVICES
- 6.3.1 NEED FOR PROACTIVE EXPERTISE AND CONTINUOUS PROTECTION SERVICES TO DRIVE MARKET
- 6.3.2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
- 6.3.2.1 Design, deployment, integration, and consulting
- 6.3.2.2 Training and education
- 6.3.2.3 Support and maintenance
- 6.3.3 MANAGED SERVICES
7 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY APPLICATION
- 7.1 INTRODUCTION
- 7.1.1 APPLICATION: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 7.2 ACCESS CONTROL
- 7.2.1 NEED FOR RIGOROUS IDENTITY VERIFICATION AND GRANULAR ACCESS MANAGEMENT TO DRIVE MARKET
- 7.3 API SECURITY
- 7.3.1 NEED TO ENSURE SECURE COMMUNICATION AND DATA SHARING BETWEEN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 7.4 USER BEHAVIOR ANALYTICS (UBA)
- 7.4.1 NEED FOR REAL-TIME DETECTION AND RESPONSE TO ANOMALOUS ACTIVITIES IN ZERO TRUST ENVIRONMENTS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 7.5 SECURITY ANALYTICS
- 7.5.1 DEMAND FOR COMPREHENSIVE THREAT DETECTION AND ENHANCED INCIDENT RESPONSE IN ZERO TRUST ENVIRONMENTS TO DRIVE MARKET
8 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY SECURITY TYPE
- 8.1 INTRODUCTION
- 8.1.1 SECURITY TYPE: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 8.2 NETWORK SECURITY
- 8.2.1 NEED TO BOLSTER NETWORK SECURITY AGAINST EVOLVING THREATS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 8.3 APPLICATION SECURITY
- 8.3.1 NEED TO PROVIDE FULL CONTROL OVER PLATFORMS, SYSTEMS, AND DATA TO ORGANIZATIONS TO PROPEL MARKET
- 8.4 CLOUD SECURITY
- 8.4.1 EMPHASIS ON STRENGTHENING CLOUD SECURITY WITH CASBS, CSPM, AND CWPPS IN ZERO TRUST SECURITY ENVIRONMENTS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 8.5 DATA SECURITY
- 8.5.1 FOCUS ON GRANULAR ACCESS CONTROLS, CONTINUOUS VERIFICATION, AND ENCRYPTION TO ENHANCE DATA SECURITY TO DRIVE MARKET
- 8.6 ENDPOINT SECURITY & IOT SECURITY
- 8.6.1 RISING COMPLEXITIES IN ENDPOINT AND IOT SECURITY TO ENCOURAGE ADOPTION OF ZERO TRUST SECURITY SOLUTIONS
9 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY AUTHENTICATION TYPE
- 9.1 INTRODUCTION
- 9.1.1 AUTHENTICATION TYPE: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 9.2 SINGLE-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION
- 9.2.1 NEED TO BOLSTER NETWORK SECURITY AGAINST EVOLVING THREATS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 9.3 MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION
- 9.3.1 DEMAND FOR ENHANCED AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION ACROSS INDUSTRIES TO DRIVE MARKET
10 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY VERTICAL
- 10.1 INTRODUCTION
- 10.1.1 VERTICAL: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 10.2 BANKING, FINANCIAL SERVICES, AND INSURANCE (BFSI)
- 10.2.1 NEED FOR ADVANCED SECURITY SOLUTIONS IN BFSI SECTOR AMID RISING CYBER THREATS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 10.3 GOVERNMENT & DEFENSE
- 10.3.1 NEED TO STRENGTHEN CYBERSECURITY RESILIENCE IN GOVERNMENT & DEFENSE SECTORS TO DRIVE MARKET
- 10.4 IT & ITES
- 10.4.1 GROWING COMPLEXITIES IN CYBERSECURITY AND STRINGENT REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS TO PROPEL MARKET
- 10.5 HEALTHCARE
- 10.5.1 ESCALATING CYBER THREATS TO BOOST POPULARITY OF ZERO TRUST SECURITY SOLUTIONS
- 10.6 RETAIL & E-COMMERCE
- 10.6.1 RISING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS TO DRIVE DEMAND FOR ZERO TRUST SECURITY SOLUTIONS
- 10.7 ENERGY & UTILITIES
- 10.7.1 NEED FOR ENHANCED CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY TO DRIVE ADOPTION OF ZERO TRUST SECURITY SOLUTIONS
- 10.8 OTHER VERTICALS
11 ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET, BY REGION
- 11.1 INTRODUCTION
- 11.2 NORTH AMERICA
- 11.2.1 NORTH AMERICA: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 11.2.2 NORTH AMERICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 11.2.3 US
- 11.2.3.1 Weak password hygiene and increased concerns regarding cybersecurity to fuel demand
- 11.2.4 CANADA
- 11.2.4.1 Rising bot attacks and ransomware and increasing government initiatives to drive market
- 11.3 EUROPE
- 11.3.1 EUROPE: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 11.3.2 EUROPE: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 11.3.3 UK
- 11.3.3.1 Increased collaboration with forces to develop robust security solutions to drive market
- 11.3.4 GERMANY
- 11.3.4.1 Rising cyberattacks on critical government websites and early adoption of cutting-edge technologies to drive market
- 11.3.5 FRANCE
- 11.3.5.1 Increased internet use and need to safeguard sensitive data to boost demand
- 11.3.6 ITALY
- 11.3.6.1 Increasing digital transformation and growing adoption of cloud services to drive demand
- 11.3.7 REST OF EUROPE
- 11.4 ASIA PACIFIC
- 11.4.1 ASIA PACIFIC: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 11.4.2 ASIA PACIFIC: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 11.4.3 CHINA
- 11.4.3.1 Booming mobile internet services and increasing importance of online payment security to drive market
- 11.4.4 JAPAN
- 11.4.4.1 Rising instances of cyberattacks to fuel demand
- 11.4.5 INDIA
- 11.4.5.1 Cultural shifts, budget constraints, and escalating threat of cyberattacks to drive market
- 11.4.6 SINGAPORE
- 11.4.6.1 Increasing government initiatives to combat cyber threats to drive demand
- 11.4.7 AUSTRALIA
- 11.4.7.1 Focus of government on adopting robust cybersecurity strategies to drive market
- 11.4.8 REST OF ASIA PACIFIC
- 11.5 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
- 11.5.1 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 11.5.2 MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 11.5.3 GCC COUNTRIES
- 11.5.3.1 KSA
- 11.5.3.1.1 Rapid digital transformation to encourage organizations to prioritize implementing effective cybersecurity solutions
- 11.5.3.2 UAE
- 11.5.3.2.1 Increasing need for effective cybersecurity infrastructure to drive demand
- 11.5.3.3 Rest of GCC Countries
- 11.5.4 SOUTH AFRICA
- 11.5.4.1 Increasing awareness of people regarding zero trust security campaigns to drive market
- 11.5.5 REST OF MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA
- 11.6 LATIN AMERICA
- 11.6.1 LATIN AMERICA: ZERO TRUST SECURITY MARKET DRIVERS
- 11.6.2 LATIN AMERICA: MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK
- 11.6.3 BRAZIL
- 11.6.3.1 Evolving cybersecurity challenges due to rapid shift to remote work during pandemic to drive market
- 11.6.4 MEXICO
- 11.6.4.1 Proliferation of connected devices and integration of XDR capabilities with zero trust principles to drive market
- 11.6.5 REST OF LATIN AMERICA
12 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
- 12.1 KEY PLAYER STRATEGIES/RIGHT TO WIN
- 12.2 REVENUE ANALYSIS
- 12.3 MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- 12.4 BRAND COMPARISON
- 12.5 COMPANY VALUATION AND FINANCIAL METRICS
- 12.5.1 COMPANY VALUATION
- 12.5.2 FINANCIAL METRICS USING EV/EBITDA
- 12.6 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: KEY PLAYERS, 2023
- 12.6.1 STARS
- 12.6.2 EMERGING LEADERS
- 12.6.3 PERVASIVE PLAYERS
- 12.6.4 PARTICIPANTS
- 12.6.5 COMPANY FOOTPRINT: KEY PLAYERS, 2023
- 12.6.5.1 Company footprint
- 12.6.5.2 Offering footprint
- 12.6.5.3 Vertical footprint
- 12.6.5.4 Regional footprint
- 12.7 COMPANY EVALUATION MATRIX: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023
- 12.7.1 PROGRESSIVE COMPANIES
- 12.7.2 RESPONSIVE COMPANIES
- 12.7.3 DYNAMIC COMPANIES
- 12.7.4 STARTING BLOCKS
- 12.7.5 COMPETITIVE BENCHMARKING: STARTUPS/SMES, 2023
- 12.7.5.1 Detailed list of key startups/SMEs
- 12.7.5.2 Competitive benchmarking of key startups/SMEs
- 12.8 COMPETITIVE SCENARIO
- 12.8.1 PRODUCT LAUNCHES
- 12.8.2 DEALS
13 COMPANY PROFILES
- 13.1 KEY PLAYERS
- 13.1.1 PALO ALTO NETWORKS
- 13.1.1.1 Business overview
- 13.1.1.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.1.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.1.4 MnM view
- 13.1.1.4.1 Key strengths
- 13.1.1.4.2 Strategic choices
- 13.1.1.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 13.1.2 VMWARE
- 13.1.2.1 Business overview
- 13.1.2.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.2.3 MnM view
- 13.1.2.3.1 Key strengths
- 13.1.2.3.2 Strategic choices
- 13.1.2.3.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 13.1.3 ZSCALER
- 13.1.3.1 Business overview
- 13.1.3.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.3.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.3.4 MnM view
- 13.1.3.4.1 Key strengths
- 13.1.3.4.2 Strategic choices
- 13.1.3.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 13.1.4 AKAMAI
- 13.1.4.1 Business overview
- 13.1.4.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.4.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.4.4 MnM view
- 13.1.4.4.1 Key strengths
- 13.1.4.4.2 Strategic choices
- 13.1.4.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 13.1.5 MICROSOFT
- 13.1.5.1 Business overview
- 13.1.5.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.5.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.5.4 MnM view
- 13.1.5.4.1 Key strengths
- 13.1.5.4.2 Strategic choices
- 13.1.5.4.3 Weaknesses and competitive threats
- 13.1.6 CISCO
- 13.1.6.1 Business overview
- 13.1.6.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.6.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.7 IBM
- 13.1.7.1 Business overview
- 13.1.7.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.7.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.8 CITRIX
- 13.1.8.1 Business overview
- 13.1.8.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.8.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.9 CHECK POINT
- 13.1.9.1 Business overview
- 13.1.9.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.9.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.10 TRELLIX
- 13.1.10.1 Business overview
- 13.1.10.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.10.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.11 FORCEPOINT
- 13.1.11.1 Business overview
- 13.1.11.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.11.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.12 CROWDSTRIKE
- 13.1.12.1 Business overview
- 13.1.12.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.12.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.13 CLOUDFLARE
- 13.1.13.1 Business overview
- 13.1.13.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.13.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.14 FORTINET
- 13.1.14.1 Business overview
- 13.1.14.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.15 GOOGLE
- 13.1.15.1 Business overview
- 13.1.15.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.15.3 Recent developments
- 13.1.16 QNEXT
- 13.1.16.1 Business overview
- 13.1.16.2 Products/Solutions/Services offered
- 13.1.16.3 Recent developments
- 13.2 OTHER PLAYERS
- 13.2.1 ILLUMIO
- 13.2.2 ON2IT
- 13.2.3 PERIMETER 81
- 13.2.4 THREATLOCKER
- 13.2.5 TWINGATE
- 13.2.6 APPGATE
- 13.2.7 ZERO NETWORKS
- 13.2.8 ZENTERA
- 13.2.9 XAGE
- 13.2.10 SKYHIGH SECURITY
14 ADJACENT MARKETS
- 14.1 INTRODUCTION
- 14.2 LIMITATIONS
- 14.3 IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT (IAM) MARKET
- 14.4 CYBERSECURITY MARKET
15 APPENDIX
- 15.1 DISCUSSION GUIDE
- 15.2 KNOWLEDGESTORE: MARKETSANDMARKETS' SUBSCRIPTION PORTAL
- 15.3 CUSTOMIZATION OPTIONS
- 15.4 RELATED REPORTS
- 15.5 AUTHOR DETAILS