查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1849906

灾难復原即服务 (DRaaS)：市场占有率分析、产业趋势、统计资料和成长预测（2025-2030 年）

Disaster Recovery As A Service (DRaaS) - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2025 - 2030)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 120 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

灾难復原即服务市场预计在 2025 年达到 137 亿美元，在 2030 年达到 240.5 亿美元，复合年增长率为 11.91%。

灾难復原即服务 (DRaaS)-市场-IMG1

勒索软体的氾滥、监管要求的不断升级以及向云端优先基础设施的策略转变，正在重塑企业连续性计划，并推动对云端原生恢復产品的需求。如今，企业需要快速、自动化的故障转移功能，以便在遭受攻击时继续运作。传统的磁带和磁碟备份已无法满足风险委员会和董事会的需求。要求经过测试的恢復计划的容错移转保险条款的兴起，进一步加强了保费与DRaaS成熟应用之间的联繫。同时，订阅模式降低了资本支出，使大型和小型企业都能获得企业级的弹性。供应商现在在编配智慧、多重云端就绪和永续性认证方面展开竞争。

全球灾难復原即服务 (DRaaS) 市场趋势与洞察

勒索软体和资料外洩事件激增

2024年，87%的IT团队将遭遇SaaS资料遗失，但只有14%的团队有信心快速恢復。医疗保健提供者正在采用云端原生恢復技术，以遵守HIPAA并保障患者照护的连续性。网路安全保险公司正在为检验的容错移转功能提供保费折扣，首席财务长可以清楚地说明采用DRaaS的财务理由。

与传统 DR 基础设施相比，TCO 更低

DRaaS 消除了二级站点和专业人员的资本支出，取而代之的是计量收费的订阅模式，可根据使用成本进行调整。 Veeam 报告显示，88% 的组织计划在两年内迁移到 DRaaS，其中成本优化是首要考虑因素。订阅定价可防止硬体过时，使 IT 团队专注于转型计划而非硬体维护。对于中小型企业而言，其经济效益尤其具有吸引力，因为它无需进行规模化投资即可实现企业级恢復，从而拓展了灾难恢復即服务 (DRaaS) 市场的覆盖范围。

混合/多重云端部署和编配的复杂性

将传统的本地资产与多个公共云端整合会给内部团队带来压力，并迫使组织学习不同的 API 和安全模型。美国国家安全局 (NSA) 建议持续测试并采用「基础设施即程式码」实践，以维护混合恢復脚本的可靠性。技能短缺推动了对託管 DRaaS 合作伙伴的依赖，但随着买家评估供应商的深度自动化和监管理解，销售週期正在延长。

細項分析

受企业对承包编配、监控和合规性报告的需求推动，到2024年，完全託管型产品将占据灾难復原即服务市场份额的47.20%。客户依赖供应商完成需要减少内部人员的活动，例如多重云端工程和全天候恢復执行。依赖援助的自助服务选项正以12.40%的复合年增长率成长，因为中小企业青睐能够平衡自主性和成本的可配置入口网站。辅助型产品处于中间位置，适用于拥有一定云技能但仍需要运作手册支援的中型企业。

託管服务的动能凸显了一个更广泛的现实：像HYCU这样的供应商，2025年的NPS（净推荐值）达到91，证明了服务的丰富性和客户体验胜过功能对等。因此，我们预期灾难復原即服务市场将根据服务品质进行更清晰的细分：高端支援层级，可以带来更高的年收入倍数；以及商品自助服务层级，追求价格敏感的利基市场。

由于采用超大规模经济和按需可扩展性，公有云将维持 58.10% 的收入成长；而混合/多重云端配置的复合年增长率将达到 14.60%，因为企业需要对冲集中度风险并满足驻留规则。随着企业将关键资料库复製到主权云，同时将不太敏感的应用程式容错移转到全球区域，混合部署中的灾难復原市场规模预计将迅速扩大。私有云端在需要严格资料分类或空气间隙的工作负载方面依然表现强劲。

Verizon 将混合云灵活性称为现代连续性规划的基石。 N2WS 的研究也认同这一观点，并指出多重云端复製可以减少供应商锁定，并提高容错移转粒度。然而，在不同云端之间编配统一的復原时间目标仍然很复杂，这凸显了开发能够抽象化特定云端特性的工具的需求。

区域分析

受法律规范推动，北美将在2024年保持39.80%的市场份额。勒索软体的爆发正在董事会层面引发紧迫感，而《联邦政府云端运营最佳实践指南》为公共部门组织提供了蓝图标准。尤其是金融机构，它们将保费折扣与经验性灾难復原测试挂钩，进一步推动了灾难復原即服务（DR）的采用。儘管亚太地区的灾难復原即服务市场对价格敏感，但由于边缘运算的采用和ESG报告的增加，需求仍然强劲。

由于各国政府支持云端运算发展以促进GDP成长，亚太地区的复合年增长率最高，达14.80%。亚洲开发银行预测，完善的云端运算政策预计在2024年至2028年间将该地区的GDP提升高达0.7%。新加坡积极的「云端优先」立场已成为政策标桿，而日本和澳洲则正在实施严格的资料主权审查，这为其架构蓝图奠定了基础。亚洲开发银行的《2025年灾难准备指南》正在整合人工智慧感测器和云端基础的復原技术。银行正在采用灾难復原即服务 (DRaaS) 来配合金融科技的敏捷性，而製造商则依赖地理分布的容错移转来保障供应链安全。

在欧洲，采用的奖励与合规障碍并存。 《一般资料保护规范》(GDPR) 和《欧盟云端认证法案》要求区域复製，这限制了设计，但也推动了对主权、「仅限欧盟」恢復节点的需求。公共部门的数位服务目标给提供者带来了压力，金融机构也持续投资以满足《数位营运弹性法案》(DORA)。儘管面临成本压力，但维护面向公民的服务的需求仍在推动市场扩张。

其他福利：

  • Excel 格式的市场预测 (ME) 表
  • 3个月的分析师支持

目录

第一章 引言

  • 研究假设和市场定义
  • 调查范围

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场状况

  • 市场概况
  • 市场驱动因素
    • 勒索软体和资料外洩事件呈上升趋势
    • 与传统 DR 基础设施相比，TCO 更低
    • 云端优先和 SaaS 的采用将加速 DRaaS 的采用
    • 网路保险合规性需要自动容错移转测试
    • 需要地理分布的微恢復节点的边缘运算部署
    • 绿色DRaaS：净零压力有利于可再生能源回收站点
  • 市场限制
    • 混合/多重云端部署和编配复杂性
    • 资料主权和跨境复製的监管障碍
    • 供应商锁定和出口成本不确定性
    • 多重云端復原工程师及技能短缺
  • 产业生态系统分析
  • 技术展望
  • 波特五力分析
    • 供应商的议价能力
    • 消费者议价能力
    • 新进入者的威胁
    • 竞争对手之间的竞争
    • 替代品的威胁

第五章市场规模与成长预测（价值）

  • 按服务类型
    • 完全託管
    • 协助
    • 自助服务
  • 按部署模型
    • 公共云端
    • 私有云端
    • 混合/多重云端
  • 按服务组件
    • 备份和復原
    • 即时复製
    • 编配和自动化
    • 资料安全与合规性
  • 按组织规模
    • 大公司
    • 小型企业
  • 按最终用户
    • BFSI
    • 资讯科技和通讯
    • 政府和公共部门
    • 医疗保健和生命科学
    • 製造业
    • 零售与电子商务
    • 媒体和娱乐
    • 其他的
  • 按地区
    • 北美洲
      • 美国
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
    • 南美洲
      • 巴西
      • 南美洲其他地区
    • 欧洲
      • 德国
      • 英国
      • 法国
      • 俄罗斯
      • 其他欧洲地区
    • 亚太地区
      • 中国
      • 日本
      • 韩国
      • 印度
      • 东南亚
      • 其他亚太地区
    • 中东和非洲
      • 中东
      • 非洲

第六章 竞争态势

  • 市场集中度
  • 策略趋势
  • 市占率分析
  • 公司简介
    • IBM Corporation
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • Amazon Web Services Inc.
    • VMware Inc.
    • Zerto Ltd.（HPE）
    • Google Cloud Platform
    • iLand Internet Solutions Inc.
    • Recovery Point Systems LLC
    • Evolve IP LLC
    • TierPoint LLC
    • Sungard Availability Services LP
    • C&W Comminications Limited
    • Expedient LLC
    • CloudHPT Inc.
    • InterVision Systems Technologies LLC
    • PhoenixNAP Global IT Services LLC
    • Flexential LLC
    • Acronis International GmbH
    • Veeam Software Inc.
    • Druva Inc.
    • Rackspace Technology inc.
    • Databarracks Ltd.
    • NTT Ltd.

第七章 市场机会与未来展望

简介目录
Product Code: 48768

The Disaster Recovery as a Service market stands at USD 13.7 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 24.05 billion by 2030, expanding at an 11.91% CAGR.

Disaster Recovery As A Service (DRaaS) - Market - IMG1

A steep rise in ransomware, expanding regulatory mandates, and a strategic tilt toward cloud-first infrastructure are reshaping corporate continuity programs and fueling demand for cloud-native recovery offerings. Enterprises now require rapid, automated failover to keep operations running during an attack; traditional tape or disk backups no longer satisfy risk committees or boards. Growing cyber-insurance clauses that insist on tested recovery plans further tighten the link between premiums and mature DRaaS adoption. At the same time, the subscription model lowers capital outlays, enabling both large enterprises and SMEs to access enterprise-grade resilience. Vendors now compete on orchestration intelligence, multi-cloud reach, and sustainability credentials, because organizations evaluate providers on both operational and environmental performance.

Global Disaster Recovery As A Service (DRaaS) Market Trends and Insights

Escalating ransomware and data-breach incidents

Attackers now exfiltrate data within hours after compromise, forcing organizations to adopt immutable snapshots and isolated recovery zones that only modern DRaaS platforms supply at scale.In 2024, 87% of IT teams experienced SaaS data loss, yet only 14% felt confident about rapid recovery. Healthcare providers embrace cloud-native recovery to stay HIPAA-compliant and safeguard patient care continuity. Cyber-insurance carriers reward verified failover capabilities with premium discounts, giving CFOs a clear financial argument for DRaaS adoption.

Lower TCO versus traditional DR infrastructure

DRaaS removes capital spending on secondary sites and specialist staff, replacing them with pay-as-you-go subscriptions that align cost to use. Veeam reports that 88% of organizations plan to shift toward DRaaS within two years, ranking cost optimization as their top motivation. Subscription pricing prevents hardware obsolescence and frees IT teams to focus on transformation projects rather than hardware upkeep. SMEs find the economics especially compelling because enterprise-grade recovery becomes attainable without scale-driven investments, broadening the total addressable Disaster Recovery as a Service market.

Deployment and orchestration complexity in hybrid/multi-cloud

Integrating legacy on-premises assets with several public clouds stretches internal teams and forces organizations to learn disparate APIs and security models. The US National Security Agency advises constant testing and infrastructure-as-code practices to keep hybrid recovery scripts reliable. Skills shortages drive reliance on managed DRaaS partners but also prolong sales cycles, as buyers evaluate providers for deep automation and regulatory comprehension.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Cloud-first and SaaS adoption accelerating DRaaS uptake
  2. Cyber-insurance compliance mandating automated fail-over testing
  3. Data-sovereignty and regulatory barriers

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Fully Managed offerings controlled 47.20% of Disaster Recovery as a Service market share in 2024 on the back of enterprise demand for turnkey orchestration, monitoring, and compliance reporting. Customers lean on providers for multi-cloud engineering and 24X7 recovery execution, activities that would otherwise balloon internal headcount. Self-Service options, though lean on assistance, post a 12.40% CAGR because SMEs prefer configurable portals that balance autonomy with cost. Assisted models sit between both ends, suiting mid-market firms that own some cloud skills yet still need run-book support.

Managed service momentum underscores a broader reality: resilience now spans infrastructure, applications, and regulatory proof. Vendors like HYCU, which scored a 91 NPS in 2025, showcase how service depth and customer experience trump feature parity. As a result, the Disaster Recovery as a Service market will likely witness sharper service-quality segmentation, where premium support tiers justify higher annual-recurring-revenue multiples, while commodity self-service tiers chase price-sensitive niches.

Public Cloud retains 58.10% revenue thanks to hyperscale economies and on-demand scalability, yet Hybrid/Multi-Cloud configurations command a 14.60% CAGR as firms hedge concentration risk and satisfy residency rules. Disaster Recovery as a Service market size for Hybrid deployments is forecast to expand swiftly because enterprises can replicate critical databases to a sovereign cloud while failing over less-sensitive apps to global regions. Private Cloud persists for workloads steeped in strict data classifications or requiring air-gapping.

Verizon calls hybrid flexibility the linchpin of modern continuity planning verizon. N2WS research agrees, noting that multi-cloud replication cuts vendor lock-in and improves failover granularity. However, orchestrating identical recovery time objectives across divergent clouds remains complex, opening room for tooling that abstracts cloud-native idiosyncrasies.

The Disaster Recovery As A Service Market is Segmented by Service Type (Fully Managed, Assisted, and More), Deployment Model (Public Cloud, Private Cloud, and More), Service Component (Backup and Recovery, Real-Time Replication, and More), Organization Size (Large Enterprises, Small and Medium Enterprises), End-User Vertical (BFSI, IT and Telecom, and More), and Geography. The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Geography Analysis

North America maintained a 39.80% share in 2024 by blending hyperscale cloud availability, mature cyber-insurance ecosystems, and prescriptive regulatory frameworks. High ransomware prevalence amplifies board-level urgency, while the Federal Cloud Operations Best Practices Guide supplies public agencies with blueprint standards. Financial institutions, in particular, tie premium discounts to demonstrable DR testing, further cementing uptake. Although the region's Disaster Recovery as a Service market now sees price competition, rising edge deployments and ESG reporting keep demand resilient.

Asia-Pacific registers the highest 14.80% CAGR as governments champion cloud growth to spur GDP. The Asian Development Bank projects that improved cloud policies can lift regional GDP by up to 0.7% between 2024 and 2028. Singapore's aggressive "cloud-first" posture sets policy benchmarks, while Japan and Australia impose rigorous data-sovereignty checks that shape architectural blueprints. National disaster exposure drives mandates for resilient ICT backbones, with agencies referencing ADB's 2025 disaster-preparedness guide to integrate AI sensors and cloud-based recovery. Banks adopt DRaaS to match fintech agility, and manufacturers rely on geo-distributed failover for supply-chain assurance.

Europe balances adoption incentives and compliance roadblocks. GDPR and incoming EU Cloud Certification laws oblige in-region replication, constraining design but also triggering demand for sovereignty-aligned "intra-EU only" recovery nodes. Sustainability legislation boosts interest in "Green-DRaaS," leveraging renewable-powered data centers to hit corporate emissions targets.Public-sector digital-service goals accelerate provider outreach, while financial entities continue to invest to satisfy the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). Despite cost pressure, the imperative to preserve citizen-facing services keeps the market expanding.

  1. IBM Corporation
  2. Microsoft Corporation
  3. Amazon Web Services Inc.
  4. VMware Inc.
  5. Zerto Ltd. (HPE)
  6. Google Cloud Platform
  7. iLand Internet Solutions Inc.
  8. Recovery Point Systems LLC
  9. Evolve IP LLC
  10. TierPoint LLC
  11. Sungard Availability Services LP
  12. C&W Comminications Limited
  13. Expedient LLC
  14. CloudHPT Inc.
  15. InterVision Systems Technologies LLC
  16. PhoenixNAP Global IT Services LLC
  17. Flexential LLC
  18. Acronis International GmbH
  19. Veeam Software Inc.
  20. Druva Inc.
  21. Rackspace Technology inc.
  22. Databarracks Ltd.
  23. NTT Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Escalating ransomware and data-breach incidents
    • 4.2.2 Lower TCO vs. traditional DR infrastructure
    • 4.2.3 Cloud-first and SaaS adoption accelerating DRaaS uptake
    • 4.2.4 Cyber-insurance compliance mandating automated fail-over testing
    • 4.2.5 Edge-computing roll-outs needing geo-distributed micro-recovery nodes
    • 4.2.6 Green-DRaaS: Net-zero pressures favouring renewably-powered recovery sites
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Deployment and orchestration complexity in hybrid/multi-cloud
    • 4.3.2 Data-sovereignty and regulatory barriers to cross-border replication
    • 4.3.3 Provider lock-in and egress-cost uncertainty
    • 4.3.4 Shortage of multi-cloud DR engineers and skills
  • 4.4 Industry Ecosystem Analysis
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Consumers
    • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.4 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
    • 4.6.5 Threat of Substitutes

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUES)

  • 5.1 By Service Type
    • 5.1.1 Fully Managed
    • 5.1.2 Assisted
    • 5.1.3 Self-Service
  • 5.2 By Deployment Model
    • 5.2.1 Public Cloud
    • 5.2.2 Private Cloud
    • 5.2.3 Hybrid/Multi-Cloud
  • 5.3 By Service Component
    • 5.3.1 Backup and Recovery
    • 5.3.2 Real-time Replication
    • 5.3.3 Orchestration and Automation
    • 5.3.4 Data Security and Compliance
  • 5.4 By Organization Size
    • 5.4.1 Large Enterprises
    • 5.4.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
  • 5.5 By End-user Vertical
    • 5.5.1 BFSI
    • 5.5.2 IT and Telecom
    • 5.5.3 Government and Public Sector
    • 5.5.4 Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • 5.5.5 Manufacturing
    • 5.5.6 Retail and E-commerce
    • 5.5.7 Media and Entertainment
    • 5.5.8 Others
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
      • 5.6.1.1 United States
      • 5.6.1.2 Canada
      • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 South America
      • 5.6.2.1 Brazil
      • 5.6.2.2 Rest of South America
    • 5.6.3 Europe
      • 5.6.3.1 Germany
      • 5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
      • 5.6.3.3 France
      • 5.6.3.4 Russia
      • 5.6.3.5 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.6.4.1 China
      • 5.6.4.2 Japan
      • 5.6.4.3 South Korea
      • 5.6.4.4 India
      • 5.6.4.5 South East Asia
      • 5.6.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
      • 5.6.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.6.5.2 Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
    • 6.4.2 Microsoft Corporation
    • 6.4.3 Amazon Web Services Inc.
    • 6.4.4 VMware Inc.
    • 6.4.5 Zerto Ltd. (HPE)
    • 6.4.6 Google Cloud Platform
    • 6.4.7 iLand Internet Solutions Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Recovery Point Systems LLC
    • 6.4.9 Evolve IP LLC
    • 6.4.10 TierPoint LLC
    • 6.4.11 Sungard Availability Services LP
    • 6.4.12 C&W Comminications Limited
    • 6.4.13 Expedient LLC
    • 6.4.14 CloudHPT Inc.
    • 6.4.15 InterVision Systems Technologies LLC
    • 6.4.16 PhoenixNAP Global IT Services LLC
    • 6.4.17 Flexential LLC
    • 6.4.18 Acronis International GmbH
    • 6.4.19 Veeam Software Inc.
    • 6.4.20 Druva Inc.
    • 6.4.21 Rackspace Technology inc.
    • 6.4.22 Databarracks Ltd.
    • 6.4.23 NTT Ltd.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment