查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1851921

消磁系统：市场占有率分析、产业趋势、统计数据和成长预测（2025-2030 年）

Degaussing Systems - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2025 - 2030)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 120 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

预计到 2025 年，消磁系统市场价值将达到 8.7 亿美元，到 2030 年将达到 11.3 亿美元，年复合成长率为 5.3%。

消磁系统-市场-IMG1

海军开支不断增长、磁性水雷技术日益复杂以及舰队延寿计划稳步推进，共同推动了电磁特征控制技术的扩张。北美驱逐舰和巡洋舰的升级改造、欧洲扫雷舰的采购以及亚太地区潜舰舰队的扩充，确保了电磁特征控制技术拥有广泛的基本客群。高温超导（HTS）线圈和软体定义控制单元加速了技术更新换代，而人工智慧（AI）演算法则透过即时调整线圈电流，不断突破性能极限。由于海军将特征控制视为一种无需建造新舰即可延长舰艇寿命的经济有效方式，因此改装需求主导了合约签订活动。围绕高温超导带材和稀土元素磁感测器的供应链压力将在短期内限制市场成长，但拥有垂直整合组件生产线的顶级供应商将能够缓解大部分中断。

全球消磁系统市场趋势与洞察

海军现代化预算增加，推动了对消磁系统的投资。

国防预算的稳定成长正在推动一项为期多年的舰艇升级计画。美国的驱逐舰延寿方案将维修特征讯号管理作为其电子战能力提升的核心组成部分。义大利的扫雷舰计画将低磁声学技术作为一项基础功能。菲律宾和加拿大类似的采购计画也巩固了消磁系统市场的长期发展前景。

磁扰海底水雷部署规模的扩大将推动对磁讯号控制的需求。

现代水雷结合了磁性、声学和压力感测器，这提高了对精确磁场抑制的要求。印度多影响水雷的检验表明，海军规划人员必须应对日益增长的杀伤力。历史损失数据显示，水雷仍然是最具成本效益的反水面武器，凸显了远洋和近海舰艇配备可靠的消磁系统的必要性。

高昂的资本投入和长期的维护成本限制了其更广泛的应用。

先进消磁系统前期投资庞大，且​​持续营运成本高昂，这成为其普及应用的一大障碍，尤其对于预算有限的小型海军而言更是如此。一套完整的消磁系统安装费用占舰艇总建造成本的2%至5%，而基于高温超导（HTS）技术的消磁组件比铜线圈方案的价格高出40%至60%。此外，包括低温冷却装置、氦气后勤保障和认证技术人员在内的专业全生命週期支持，将使一艘中型作战舰艇十年的维护成本增加200万至400万美元。这些经济因素往往迫使各国海军将全频谱特征管理限制在航空母舰、潜舰和一线驱逐舰上，而接受低优先级舰艇上残留的磁性特征。因此，新兴海事国家的市场渗透速度缓慢，因为高昂的资本成本挤占了其他作战系统的升级空间。

细分市场分析

细分市场总合凸显了隐蔽平台如何推动支出成长。到2024年，潜舰将占消磁系统市场收入的29.65%，而鱼雷对抗舰艇将以7.89%的复合年增长率实现最快成长。这种性能差距反映了衝击水雷构成的巨大威胁，以及在零下温度和近岸位置隐藏的重要性。澳洲、印度和韩国的潜舰计画在设计阶段就整合了全船体线圈组，这与通常需要后期改装的水面舰艇形成鲜明对比。鱼雷扫雷舰已经采用低铁氧体复合材料，但仍在增加分布式微环以消除残余磁性。驱逐舰和护卫舰的中期升级与雷达和声音吶的更新周期同步进行，这为消磁能力创造了协同效应，并维持了巨大的市场需求。

在分配预算时，海军会考虑每艘舰艇独特的风险敞口。潜水艇面临持续的被动探测风险，因此需要使用高规格的专用材料。相反，轻型护卫舰采用模组化架构，使用针对当地磁场条件额定值的标准化线圈模组来分摊成本。这种细微差别迫使供应商提供无需重写控制代码即可配置的系统，这些系统适用于从30米无人舰艇到10万吨级运输舰的各种舰艇。

连续消磁系统占2024年销售额的60.90%，凸显了其作为基准的适用性。儘管消磁仍然是核心技术，但随着现代钢材即使在反覆极地航行后仍能保持高剩磁，消磁的重要性再次凸显。到2030年，6.12%的复合年增长率证实，海军将定期消磁视为部署到易布雷咽喉要道前的关键保障措施。目前码头边的消磁笼采用脉衝直流技术，能够在传统处理方式一半的时间内将磁通密度降低95.5%。此外，便携式消磁垫使护卫舰能够在巡逻期间重置自身特征讯号，而无需返回母港。

儘管应用领域较小，但测距设施透过提供实测磁场数据，形成了一个完整的回馈迴路。软体分析将这些测量结果外推至线圈电流设定值，显示即使是低收入领域也能带动高利润数位服务的开发。

区域分析

2024年，北美占全球销售额的34.17%。光是美国的驱逐舰和巡洋舰延寿合约就维持着数十亿美元的订单，这些订单主要集中在国产线圈、磁力计和控制单元上。加拿大金斯顿级驱逐舰的消磁维修以及盟国的对外军售（FMS）计画进一步巩固了该地区的地位。北美船厂拥有三个经认证的高温超导（HTS）测试平台，是全球最先进的超导部署专案所在地。

至2030年，亚太地区将以8.80%的复合年增长率领先全球。不断增长的国防预算和日益激烈的海上航道竞争将推动市场需求。日本正在扩大其最上级护卫舰的高温超导（HTS）测试，澳洲的「奥库斯」级潜舰试验将采用超越传统标准的磁性特征管理技术。印度的鱼雷项目，加上东南亚不断壮大的近海舰队，正加速无人平台微型消磁解决方案的普及应用。中国造船厂正在将人工智慧驱动的磁场调谐软体应用于其新型054B型护卫舰，引领该地区的技术发展，并激励其他国家迎头赶上。

欧洲仍然充满活力，北约在波罗的海和北极地区的部署为其註入了动力。义大利的扫雷计画和法国的FDI护卫舰系列融合了驱逐舰和测距舰的功能，推动了系统级采购。英国的31型舰艇计画现已将数位孪生检验的线圈布局作为标准配置，凸显了该地区对磁性卫星的重视。对极地科研破冰船的同步投资，不仅使收入来源摆脱了战斗机的束缚，也为消磁设备供应商开闢了民用海事领域的市场。

其他福利：

  • Excel格式的市场预测（ME）表
  • 3个月的分析师支持

目录

第一章 引言

  • 研究假设和市场定义
  • 调查范围

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场情势

  • 市场概览
  • 市场驱动因素
    • 海军现代化预算增加，推动了对消磁系统的投资。
    • 磁性水雷的部署日益增多，推动了对磁性特征控制的需求。
    • 扩大老旧水面舰艇的改装倡议。
    • 高温超导（HTS）线圈技术的出现使得紧凑高效的系统成为可能。
    • 整合人工智慧驱动的自适应演算法以实现即时签章管理
    • 对隐蔽式无人水面和水下航行器系统的需求不断增长
  • 市场限制
    • 高昂的资本支出和长期的维护成本限制了其更广泛的应用。
    • 复杂的国防采购程序会延长采购週期。
    • 将资源重新分配给新兴的电磁轨道炮和定向能量武器系统会减少资金筹措的可能性。
    • 高温超导磁带和稀土元素磁感测器的供应链脆弱性阻碍了生产扩充性。
  • 价值链分析
  • 监管环境
  • 技术展望
  • 波特五力分析
    • 新进入者的威胁
    • 供应商的议价能力
    • 买方的议价能力
    • 替代品的威胁
    • 竞争对手之间的竞争

第五章 市场规模与成长预测

  • 按船舶类型
    • 航空母舰
    • 驱逐舰
    • 巡防舰
    • 克尔维特
    • 潜水艇
    • 扫雷舰艇
    • 其他船舶类型
  • 透过解决方案
    • 去古兹
    • 脱叶
    • 测距
  • 按组件
    • 控制单元（DCU）
    • 功率放大器
    • 线圈和电缆
    • 磁力计和感测器
    • 软体与分析
  • 按安装类型
    • 新成立
    • 改装
  • 按地区
    • 北美洲
      • 美国
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
    • 欧洲
      • 英国
      • 德国
      • 法国
      • 其他欧洲地区
    • 南美洲
      • 巴西
      • 其他南美洲国家
    • 亚太地区
      • 中国
      • 日本
      • 印度
      • 韩国
      • 亚太其他地区
    • 中东和非洲
      • 中东
      • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
      • 沙乌地阿拉伯
      • 其他中东地区
      • 非洲
      • 南非
      • 其他非洲地区

第六章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度
  • 策略趋势
  • 市占率分析
  • 公司简介
    • L3Harris Technologies Inc.
    • Wartsila Corporation
    • Polyamp AB
    • Larsen & Toubro Limited
    • Exail SAS
    • IFEN SpA
    • American Superconductor Corporation（AMSC）
    • Dayatech Merin Sdn Bhd
    • DA Group
    • Ultra Electronics Holdings Ltd.
    • Babcock International Group
    • Thales Group
    • ESCO Technologies inc.

第七章 市场机会与未来展望

简介目录
Product Code: 68094

The degaussing systems market size is estimated at USD 0.87 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 1.13 billion by 2030, advancing at a 5.3% CAGR.

Degaussing Systems - Market - IMG1

Rising naval expenditure, the growing sophistication of magnetic-influence sea mines, and the steady pace of fleet-life-extension programs underpin this expansion. North American destroyer and cruiser upgrades, European mine-hunter procurement, and expanding Asia-Pacific submarine fleets ensure a broad customer base for electromagnetic signature control. High-temperature superconducting (HTS) coils and software-defined control units foster technology refresh cycles, while artificial-intelligence (AI) algorithms push performance thresholds by moderating coil currents in real time. Retrofit demand governs contract activity because navies view signature management as a cost-effective path to stretching ship life without new-build outlays. Supply-chain pressure around HTS tape and rare-earth magnetic sensors tempers short-term growth, yet tier-one vendors with vertically integrated component lines mitigate most disruption.

Global Degaussing Systems Market Trends and Insights

Rising Naval Modernization Budgets Accelerating Investment in Degaussing Systems

Steady growth in defense allocations keeps multi-year ship-upgrade pipelines active. The US Navy's destroyer life-extension package earmarks signature-management retrofits as core electronic-warfare enhancements. Italy's mine-hunter program embeds low-magneto-acoustic technologies as a baseline fit. Similar procurement blueprints in the Philippines and Canada cement a long runway for the degaussing systems market.

Increased Deployment of Magnetic-Influence Sea Mines Driving Demand for Magnetic Signature Control

Modern mines combine magnetic, acoustic, and pressure sensors, elevating precise field suppression requirements. The validation of India's multi-influence ground mine exemplifies the rising lethality that naval planners must counter. Historical loss figures reveal that mines remain the most cost-effective anti-surface weapon, anchoring the need for robust degaussing across blue-water and littoral vessels.

Elevated Capital Expenditure and Long-Term Maintenance Costs Limit Broader Adoption

The substantial upfront investment and ongoing operational expenses associated with advanced degaussing systems create adoption barriers, particularly for smaller naval forces with constrained budgets. Comprehensive degaussing installations can represent 2-5% of total vessel construction costs, and HTS-based packages command premiums that exceed copper-coil alternatives by 40-60%. Specialized lifecycle support-including cryogenic cooling plants, helium logistics, and certified technicians-adds USD 2-4 million over a 10-year maintenance horizon for a mid-sized combatant. These financial realities often force navies to confine full-spectrum signature management to aircraft carriers, submarines, and frontline destroyers while accepting residual magnetic footprints on lower-priority hulls. Consequently, market penetration among emerging maritime nations lags because capital charges crowd out other combat-system upgrades.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Expansion of Retrofit Initiatives Targeting Older Surface Vessels for Degaussing Upgrades
  2. Emergence of High-Temperature Superconducting Coil Technology Enabling Compact and Efficient Systems
  3. Supply-Chain Vulnerabilities for HTS Tape and Rare-Earth-Based Magnetic Sensors Hinder Production Scalability

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

The segment totals underline how covert platforms anchor spending. The submarines category accounted for 29.65% of degaussing systems market revenue in 2024, while mine counter-measure ships will expand fastest at 7.89% CAGR. This performance differential mirrors the pronounced threat from influence mines and the strategic premium on under-ice and littoral concealment. Submarine programmes in Australia, India, and South Korea integrate full-hull coil sets at the design stage, contrasting with surface ships where retrofitting is the norm. Mine-hunter hulls already built with low-ferrite composites still add distributed micro-loops to crush residual magnetism. Destroyers and frigates maintain sizeable demand because mid-life upgrades coincide with radar and sonar refresh cycles, creating a multiplier effect for degaussing work scopes.

Navies weigh vessel-specific risk exposure when allocating budgets. Submarines face continuous passive detection risk and thus justify high-spec proprietary materials. Conversely, corvettes adopt modular architectures that spread costs using standardized coil modules rated for regional magnetic conditions. The nuanced mix obliges suppliers to field configurable systems ranging from 30-meter unmanned craft to 100,000-ton carriers without rewriting control code.

Continuous degaussing systems cornered 60.90% of 2024 revenue, highlighting their status as a baseline fit. Though degaussing remains core, deperming has re-emerged because modern steels retain higher remanence after repeated polar transits. A 6.12% CAGR through 2030 underscores how navies view periodic demagnetization as vital insurance before deployment into mined chokepoints. Contemporary pierside deperming cages employ pulsed direct current techniques capable of 95.5% flux-density reduction in half the legacy processing time. Additionally, portable deperming mats allow frigates to reset signatures during patrols without returning to home dock, raising operational readiness and underpinning a positive outlook for the deperming slice of the degaussing systems market.

Although a smaller niche, ranging facilities close the feedback loop by providing empirical magnetic-field data. Software analytics extrapolate these readings into coil-current setpoints, demonstrating that even lower-revenue segments create pull-through for higher-margin digital services.

The Degaussing Systems Market Report is Segmented by Vessel Type (Aircraft Carriers, Destroyers, Frigates, Corvettes, Submarines, and More), Solution (Degaussing, Deperming, and Ranging), Component (Control Units, Power Amplifiers, Coils and Cabling, and More), Installation Type (New-Build Installation and Retrofit), and Geography (North America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 34.17% of 2024 revenue. The US Navy's destroyer and cruiser service-life-extension contracts alone sustain a multi-billion-dollar pipeline that favors domestically produced coils, magnetometers, and control units. Canada's Kingston-class degaussing refits and allied Foreign Military Sales (FMS) cases further reinforce the region's standing. With three qualified HTS testbeds, North American yards host the most advanced superconducting deployment programmes worldwide.

Asia-Pacific will post the highest 8.80% CAGR through 2030. Rising defense budgets and contested sea lanes propel demand. Japan extends HTS trials to its Mogami-class frigates, while Australia's AUKUS submarine endeavour integrates magnetic-signature management standards that exceed legacy benchmarks. India's mine programme, coupled with Southeast Asian littoral fleet expansion, accelerates the adoption of micro-degaussing solutions for unmanned platforms. Chinese shipyards embed AI-driven field-tuning software across new Type 054B builds, setting regional technology pace and prompting peers to keep up.

Europe remains pivotal, galvanized by NATO's Baltic and High North posture. Italy's mine-hunter initiative and France's FDI frigate series incorporate deperming and ranging combinations that drive systems-of-systems procurement. The United Kingdom's Type 31 programme specifies digital-twin-validated coil layouts as standard, underscoring regional commitment to magnetic hygiene. Parallel investments in polar research icebreakers introduce civil maritime niches for degaussing vendors, diversifying revenue streams beyond combatants.

  1. L3Harris Technologies Inc.
  2. Wartsila Corporation
  3. Polyamp AB
  4. Larsen & Toubro Limited
  5. Exail SAS
  6. IFEN S.p.A.
  7. American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC)
  8. Dayatech Merin Sdn Bhd
  9. DA Group
  10. Ultra Electronics Holdings Ltd.
  11. Babcock International Group
  12. Thales Group
  13. ESCO Technologies inc.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising naval modernization budgets accelerating investment in degaussing systems
    • 4.2.2 Increased deployment of magnetic-influence sea mines driving demand for magnetic signature control
    • 4.2.3 Expansion of retrofit initiatives targeting older surface vessels for degaussing upgrades
    • 4.2.4 Emergence of high-temperature superconducting (HTS) coil technology enabling compact and efficient systems
    • 4.2.5 Integration of AI-powered adaptive algorithms for real-time signature management
    • 4.2.6 Growing requirement for systems in stealthy unmanned surface and underwater vehicles
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Elevated capital expenditure and long-term maintenance costs limit broader adoption
    • 4.3.2 Extended acquisition timelines due to complex defense procurement procedures
    • 4.3.3 Resource reallocation toward emerging railgun and directed-energy weapon systems reduces funding availability
    • 4.3.4 Supply-chain vulnerabilities for HTS tape and rare-earth-based magnetic sensors hinder production scalability
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Vessel Type
    • 5.1.1 Aircraft Carriers
    • 5.1.2 Destroyers
    • 5.1.3 Frigates
    • 5.1.4 Corvettes
    • 5.1.5 Submarines
    • 5.1.6 Mine Countermeasure Vessels
    • 5.1.7 Other Vessel Types
  • 5.2 By Solution
    • 5.2.1 Degaussing
    • 5.2.2 Deperming
    • 5.2.3 Ranging
  • 5.3 By Component
    • 5.3.1 Control Units (DCU)
    • 5.3.2 Power Amplifiers
    • 5.3.3 Coils and Cabling
    • 5.3.4 Magnetometers and Sensors
    • 5.3.5 Software and Analytics
  • 5.4 By Installation Type
    • 5.4.1 New-Build Installation
    • 5.4.2 Retrofit
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
      • 5.5.1.1 United States
      • 5.5.1.2 Canada
      • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
      • 5.5.2.1 United Kingdom
      • 5.5.2.2 Germany
      • 5.5.2.3 France
      • 5.5.2.4 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 South America
      • 5.5.3.1 Brazil
      • 5.5.3.2 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.5.4.1 China
      • 5.5.4.2 Japan
      • 5.5.4.3 India
      • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
      • 5.5.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
      • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
      • 5.5.5.1.1 United Arab Emirates
      • 5.5.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
      • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
      • 5.5.5.2 Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
      • 5.5.5.2.2 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles {(includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)}
    • 6.4.1 L3Harris Technologies Inc.
    • 6.4.2 Wartsila Corporation
    • 6.4.3 Polyamp AB
    • 6.4.4 Larsen & Toubro Limited
    • 6.4.5 Exail SAS
    • 6.4.6 IFEN S.p.A.
    • 6.4.7 American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC)
    • 6.4.8 Dayatech Merin Sdn Bhd
    • 6.4.9 DA Group
    • 6.4.10 Ultra Electronics Holdings Ltd.
    • 6.4.11 Babcock International Group
    • 6.4.12 Thales Group
    • 6.4.13 ESCO Technologies inc.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment