查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1940654

教育领域的虚拟实境：市场占有率分析、产业趋势与统计、成长预测（2026-2031）

Virtual Reality In Education - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2026 - 2031)
出版日期: | 出版商: Mordor Intelligence | 英文 120 Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

※ 本网页内容可能与最新版本有所差异。详细情况请与我们联繫。

简介目录

2025年，虚拟实境在教育领域的市值为312.8亿美元，预计2031年将达到952.8亿美元，高于2026年的376.6亿美元。

预计在预测期（2026-2031 年）内，复合年增长率将达到 20.4%。

教育领域的虚拟实境市场-IMG1

头戴式设备价格下降、政府津贴力度加大以及学习者学习效果的显着提升，持续推动虚拟实境教育市场的成长。尤其值得一提的是，企业正在积极采用身临其境型培训项目，预计这些项目可将学习时间缩短高达75%，同时将知识保留率提高四倍。儘管硬体仍占据收入的大部分，但随着教育机构寻求承包内容和分析功能，以服务为导向的订阅套餐增长最为迅猛。在拜登-哈里斯政府2.77亿美元创新基金的领先下，北美地区的采用率遥遥领先；而亚太地区则在中国和日本基础建设规划的推动下加速发展。市场竞争较为激烈，Meta和微软等主流平台与zSpace和Labster等专注于提供与课程相契合的内容和经济高效部署模式的专业公司竞争。

全球教育领域虚拟实境市场趋势与洞察

互动式和个人化学习的需求日益增长

教育机构越来越重视身临其境型学习的价值，而这种学习方式能够适应不同的学习风格。研究表明，VR学习者的自信心提升了275%，完成课程的速度是传统课堂学习者的四倍。大学已经发现，目前的VR课程缺乏设计思考技能，这为那些将技术严谨性与教学方法结合的供应商创造了机会。人工智慧驱动的引擎能够为每位学习者优化学习内容，例如zSpace的职业教练AI，它将本地劳动力市场数据与学习者的职业发展路径联繫起来。可控制的虚拟环境能够减轻情绪障碍学生的焦虑，并提高他们的学习效率。随着以学习者为中心的学习模式逐渐成为主流，虚拟实境技术正成为教育机构提升学习成果的核心基础设施。

透过提高参与度来获得更高的相关人员认可

可量化的结果能够同时说服管理者、家长和企业发展领导者。护理专业的学生在虚拟实境（VR）场景下的参与率高达95%，而传统实验室的参与率仅15%。製造业在实施VR安全训练后，职场减少了43%。在数学课堂上，与能够阐明抽象概念的3D物件互动，大大提高了课堂参与度。 Meta与13所大学合作的计画展现了强大的教育信誉，并创造了鼓励其他机构采用的模式。这些成果正在教育领域的VR市场中形成投资与接受的良性循环。

缺乏高品质的与课程相关的虚拟实境内容

许多应用优先考虑娱乐性而非教育效果，导致相关人员缺乏符合学习标准的资源，尤其是在非英语市场。教师难以找到融合评量工具和建构主义教学方法的虚拟实境模组，儘管硬体供应充足，但虚拟实境技术的普及仍然受到阻碍。医疗等专业领域需要符合监管要求，但经过检验的案例仍然稀缺。像 Pearson XR Bootcamps 这样的伙伴关係展现了初步进展，但仍不足以满足全球需求。在内容库扩充之前，虚拟实境教育市场的发展将落后于底层硬体的效能。

细分市场分析

截至2025年，硬体将占据教育VR市场份额的60.72%，这主要得益于学校和培训中心的设备部署。然而，服务领域预计将以22.2%的复合年增长率成长，因为教育机构更倾向于将内容、设备管理和分析功能整合到订阅套餐中的模式。预计到2031年，教育VR服务市场的规模将超过软体收入。虽然独立头戴装置的亲民价格将维持对硬体的需求，但供应商已经开始提供永久更新服务并缩短更新週期。

订阅模式降低了预算紧张的学区的资本支出门槛。 ArborXR进军学习分析领域以及zSpace的AI驱动型指导工具，都显示供应商正在将其硬体基础架构转型为可产生持续收入的生态系统。用于改进教学设计的培训和咨询服务如今已成为招标书的关键组成部分。这些趋势预示着采购方式正向提案导向转变，从而增强了整个虚拟实境产业的经常性收入来源。

学术机构仍占教育领域虚拟实境（VR）应用的64.62%，这反映了中小学和大学等机构领先透过拨款津贴VR应用的情况。然而，企业培训领域正以22.9%的复合年增长率成长，这主要得益于VR在安全、合规和客户服务方面带来的可衡量的投资回报率（ROI）。预计到2031年，企业教育领域的VR市场规模将与学术界持平。医疗保健和采矿业的公司在实施身临其境型培训专案后，错误率下降了40%以上，从而加快了投资回报週期。

企业正优先考虑软性技能和产品知识模组，这推动了对快速内容创作工具和分析整合的需求。教育领域的成长仍在继续，但预算週期和课程核准流程构成了一定的障碍。对供应商而言，提供能够同时满足这两个领域需求的多元化产品组合，将有助于虚拟实境产业抵御经济波动的影响。

教育领域的虚拟实境市场按组件（硬体、软体、服务）、最终用户（学术机构、企业培训）、设备类型（独立式头戴装置、有线连接电脑的VR头戴装置等）、应用领域（STEM/技术教育、医疗/保健培训等）和地区（北美等）进行细分。市场预测以以金额为准（美元）为单位。

区域分析

北美地区预计将占2025年收入的38.95%，这主要得益于其强大的津贴计画和成熟的教育科技（EdTech）生态系统。一项2.77亿美元的政府创新津贴正在支持身临其境型代数工具的开发，而国家科学基金会则投入250​​0万美元用于研发和促进大学合作。企业对虚拟实境技术的应用正在扩展到医疗保健、零售和科技产业，例如Interplay Learning等公司正在扩展其虚拟实境模组以应对人才短缺问题。这些因素正在推动教育领域虚拟实境市场的强劲成长，但随着普及率的提高，成长速度正在放缓。

预计到2031年，亚太地区将以21.5%的复合年增长率成为该地区虚拟实境技术发展最快的区域。光是2025年，中国各省预计就将为职业培训虚拟实境实验室计画发布价值超过1500万美元的竞标；日本的「DX高中」计画则为每个校园拨款高达1000万日元，以促进数位化。韩国正在采用虚拟实境技术来降低技术培训的资本成本，世界银行的研究人员也强调了这个做法。随着这些政策的协调一致加速课堂应用，亚太地区预计将在教育虚拟实境市场缩小与北美的差距。

在欧洲，数位欧洲计画拨款13亿欧元，并向包括虚拟世界课程在内的专业学院提供1.08亿欧元的支持，这些措施正在产生正面影响。 ClassVR在苏格兰地方政府的推广表明，区域机构正在积极推动系统化的采购。在南美和中东等新兴市场，低于300美元的硬体价格正在推动虚拟实境技术的普及，但基础设施的限制阻碍了即时广泛应用。整体而言，政策的协调性和资金投入仍是预测虚拟实境教育市场区域发展趋势的关键指标。

其他福利：

  • Excel格式的市场预测（ME）表
  • 3个月的分析师支持

目录

第一章 引言

  • 研究假设和市场定义
  • 调查范围

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场情势

  • 市场概览
  • 市场驱动因素
    • 互动式和个人化学习的需求日益增长
    • 透过提高相关人员的参与度，提高他们的接受度。
    • 独立VR头戴装置显价格下降和广泛普及
    • 政府和机构对教育科技的资金筹措（后疫情时代）
    • 将眼动追踪分析整合到自适应虚拟实境中
    • 采用 WebXR 标准可降低整体拥有成本
  • 市场限制
    • 缺乏高品质的与课程相关的虚拟实境内容
    • 教育机构的初始安装和维护成本较高
    • 课堂中的生物识别资料隐私问题
    • 教师培训不足和教学阻力
  • 监管环境
  • 技术展望
  • 产业价值链分析
  • 波特五力分析
    • 供应商的议价能力
    • 消费者议价能力
    • 新进入者的威胁
    • 替代品的威胁
    • 竞争对手之间的竞争
  • 定价分析—VR应用分发与定价模型
  • 主要用例和案例研究
    • 中文课堂实施方案
    • 为企业提供VR培训以规范服务
    • 虚拟实地考察（例如，Google探险）
  • 对影响市场的宏观经济因素进行评估
  • 投资分析

第五章 市场规模与成长预测

  • 按组件
    • 硬体
    • 软体
    • 服务
  • 最终用户
    • 学术机构
      • K-12教育
      • 高等教育
    • 企业培训
      • 资讯科技和电信
      • 卫生保健
      • 零售与电子商务
      • 其他企业用户
  • 依设备类型
    • 独立式耳机
    • 有线PC- VR头戴装置
    • 智慧型手机相容的虚拟现实
    • 混合实境头戴式显示器
  • 按应用程式字段
    • STEM（科学、技术、工程和数学）和技术教育
    • 医疗卫生训练
    • 语言与艺术研究
    • 专业和技术技能
    • 软性技能与团队合作
  • 按地区
    • 北美洲
      • 我们
      • 加拿大
      • 墨西哥
    • 南美洲
      • 巴西
      • 阿根廷
      • 南美洲其他地区
    • 欧洲
      • 德国
      • 英国
      • 法国
      • 西班牙
      • 其他欧洲地区
    • 亚太地区
      • 中国
      • 印度
      • 日本
      • 韩国
      • ASEAN
      • 亚太其他地区
    • 中东和非洲
      • 中东
        • 沙乌地阿拉伯
        • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
        • 土耳其
        • 其他中东地区
      • 非洲
        • 南非
        • 奈及利亚
        • 肯亚
        • 其他非洲地区

第六章 竞争情势

  • 市场集中度
  • 策略趋势
  • 市占率分析
  • 公司简介
    • Meta Platforms, Inc.
    • HTC Corporation
    • Lenovo Group Limited
    • Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    • Microsoft Corporation
    • Sony Group Corporation
    • Alphabet Inc.
    • Pico Technology Co., Ltd.
    • Valve Corporation
    • Unity Technologies SF
    • Epic Games, Inc.
    • zSpace, Inc.
    • EON Reality, Inc.
    • Avantis Systems Ltd.
    • Veative Labs Pvt. Ltd.
    • Virtalis Holdings Limited
    • Nearpod, Inc.
    • Labster ApS
    • Immerse VR Ltd.
    • VictoryXR, Inc.
    • Dreamscape Immersive, Inc.
    • Alchemy Immersive Limited

第七章 市场机会与未来展望

简介目录
Product Code: 70019

The Virtual Reality In Education Market was valued at USD 31.28 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 37.66 billion in 2026 to reach USD 95.28 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 20.4% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

Virtual Reality In Education - Market - IMG1

Lower headset prices, sizable government grants, and measurable improvements in learner performance continue to propel the virtual reality in education market, especially as corporations adopt immersive training programs that reduce seat time by up to 75% while quadrupling knowledge retention. Hardware still supplies most revenue, but service-oriented subscription packages are expanding fastest as institutions seek turnkey content and analytics. North America leads the adoption due to the Biden-Harris Administration's USD 277 million innovation fund, whereas the Asia Pacific accelerates on the back of Chinese and Japanese infrastructure programs. Competitive rivalry is moderate, as large platforms such as Meta and Microsoft contend with specialists like zSpace and Labster, which pair curriculum-aligned content with cost-effective deployment models.

Global Virtual Reality In Education Market Trends and Insights

Rising Demand for Interactive and Personalized Learning

Institutions increasingly value immersive lessons that adapt to diverse learning styles, with studies showing VR learners achieve 275% higher confidence and complete courses four times faster than classroom cohorts. Universities highlight gaps in design-thinking skills within current VR curricula, opening opportunities for providers that combine technical rigor with pedagogy. AI-driven engines tailor content to each learner; zSpace's Career Coach AI, for instance, matches local labor-market data to personalized study pathways Controlled virtual environments also reduce anxiety for students with emotional impairments while boosting retention. As learner-centric models move mainstream, the virtual reality in education market becomes core infrastructure for institutions seeking improved outcomes.

Greater Stakeholder Acceptance from Higher Engagement

Quantified gains are persuading administrators, parents, and corporate L&D heads alike. Nursing programs see 95% participation when scenarios run in VR versus 15% in traditional labs. Manufacturing firms report 43% drops in workplace injuries after VR safety drills. Classroom engagement spikes in mathematics when students manipulate 3-D objects that clarify abstract concepts. Meta's program with 13 universities demonstrates institutional confidence, creating reference sites that spur peer adoption. These outcomes generate a virtuous cycle of investment and acceptance for the virtual reality in education market.

Scarcity of Quality Curriculum-Aligned VR Content

Many applications prioritize entertainment over pedagogy, leaving educators short of materials that match learning standards, especially outside English-speaking markets. Teachers struggle to locate VR modules that embed assessment tools and constructivist methods, hampering adoption despite hardware availability. Specialized domains such as medicine need regulatory compliance, yet the pipeline of validated scenarios remains thin. Partnerships like Pearson-XR Bootcamp illustrate early progress but are insufficient to satisfy global demand. Until content libraries scale, growth of the virtual reality in education market will trail underlying hardware capability.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Falling Prices and Ubiquity of Standalone VR Headsets
  2. Government/Institutional EdTech Funding Post-Pandemic
  3. Teacher Training Gaps and Pedagogical Resistance

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Hardware captured 60.72% of the virtual reality in education market share in 2025 on the strength of device rollouts across schools and training centers. However, the services segment is on pace for 22.2% CAGR as institutions favor subscription bundles that bundle content, device management, and analytics. The virtual reality in education market size tied to services is poised to overtake software revenue approaching 2031. Standalone headset affordability keeps hardware relevant, yet platform vendors are already bundling perpetual updates, reducing replacement cycles.

Subscription models also mitigate capital-expenditure barriers for districts with limited budgets. ArborXR's shift into learning analytics and zSpace's AI-powered guidance tools illustrate how vendors convert hardware footholds into recurring-revenue ecosystems. Training and consulting services that improve instructional design now factor prominently in RFPs. These patterns signal a pivot toward outcomes-based procurement, reinforcing recurrent income streams across the virtual reality industry.

Academic institutions still own 64.62% of the virtual reality in education, reflecting early grant-funded pilots across K-12 and universities. Yet corporate training advances at 22.9% CAGR, propelled by measurable ROI in safety, compliance, and customer-service scenarios. The virtual reality in education market size attributable to enterprises is projected to approach parity with academia by 2031. Corporations in healthcare and mining have logged 40%-plus error reductions after immersive programs, shortening payback periods.

Enterprises champion soft-skills and product-knowledge modules, fueling demand for rapid-authoring tools and analytics integrations. Academic growth continues but faces budget cycles and curriculum-approval processes. For vendors, diversified portfolios that address both segments offer resilience against economic swings within the virtual reality industry.

Virtual Reality in Education Market is Segmented by Component (Hardware, Software, and Services), End User (Academic Institutions, and Corporate Training), Device Type (Standalone Headsets, Tethered PC-VR Headsets, and More), Application Area (STEM and Technical Education, Medical and Healthcare Training, and More), and Geography (North America, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Geography Analysis

North America retained 38.95% of 2025 revenue thanks to robust grant programs and a mature EdTech ecosystem. The Administration's USD 277 million innovation grants earmark immersive algebra tools, while the National Science Foundation commits USD 25 million to R&D, seeding university partnerships. Corporate uptake spans healthcare, retail, and skilled trades as companies such as Interplay Learning scale VR modules for talent shortages. These forces keep the virtual reality market in education expanding at a healthy clip, though growth moderates as penetration rises.

Asia Pacific is set to log the fastest regional CAGR of 21.5% through 2031. China's provinces issued tenders exceeding USD 15 million for vocational VR labs in 2025 alone, while Japan's DX High School scheme funds up to JPY 10 million per campus for digital upgrades. South Korean institutions deploy VR to cut equipment costs in technical training, an approach highlighted by World Bank researchers. These coordinated policies accelerate classroom integration, positioning Asia Pacific to narrow its gap with North America in the virtual reality in education market.

Europe benefits from the Digital Europe Programme's EUR 1.3 billion allocation and EUR 108 million for specialist academies that include virtual-worlds curricula. Scotland's council-wide ClassVR rollout shows regional bodies embracing systemic procurement. Emerging markets in South America and the Middle East follow as hardware prices dip below USD 300, though infrastructure constraints still curb immediate uptake. Overall, policy alignment and funding density remain the primary predictors of regional traction for the virtual reality in education market.

  1. Meta Platforms, Inc.
  2. HTC Corporation
  3. Lenovo Group Limited
  4. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  5. Microsoft Corporation
  6. Sony Group Corporation
  7. Alphabet Inc.
  8. Pico Technology Co., Ltd.
  9. Valve Corporation
  10. Unity Technologies SF
  11. Epic Games, Inc.
  12. zSpace, Inc.
  13. EON Reality, Inc.
  14. Avantis Systems Ltd.
  15. Veative Labs Pvt. Ltd.
  16. Virtalis Holdings Limited
  17. Nearpod, Inc.
  18. Labster ApS
  19. Immerse VR Ltd.
  20. VictoryXR, Inc.
  21. Dreamscape Immersive, Inc.
  22. Alchemy Immersive Limited

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising demand for interactive and personalized learning
    • 4.2.2 Greater stakeholder acceptance from higher engagement
    • 4.2.3 Falling prices and ubiquity of standalone VR headsets
    • 4.2.4 Government/Institutional EdTech funding post-COVID
    • 4.2.5 Integration of eye-tracking analytics for adaptive VR
    • 4.2.6 WebXR standards lowering total cost of ownership
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Scarcity of quality curriculum-aligned VR content
    • 4.3.2 High upfront and maintenance costs for institutions
    • 4.3.3 Biometric data-privacy concerns in classrooms
    • 4.3.4 Teacher training gaps and pedagogical resistance
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Consumers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Pricing Analysis - VR App Distribution and Pricing Models
  • 4.9 Key Use-Cases and Implementation Case Studies
    • 4.9.1 China's classroom roll-out programmes
    • 4.9.2 Corporate VR training for service standardisation
    • 4.9.3 Virtual field trips (e.g., Google Expeditions)
  • 4.10 Assessment of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
  • 4.11 Investment Analysis

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Component
    • 5.1.1 Hardware
    • 5.1.2 Software
    • 5.1.3 Services
  • 5.2 By End User
    • 5.2.1 Academic Institutions
      • 5.2.1.1 K-12 Learning
      • 5.2.1.2 Higher Education
    • 5.2.2 Corporate Training
      • 5.2.2.1 IT and Telecom
      • 5.2.2.2 Healthcare
      • 5.2.2.3 Retail and E-commerce
      • 5.2.2.4 Other Corporate Users
  • 5.3 By Device Type
    • 5.3.1 Standalone Headsets
    • 5.3.2 Tethered PC-VR Headsets
    • 5.3.3 Smartphone-Enabled VR
    • 5.3.4 Mixed-Reality Head-Mounted Displays
  • 5.4 By Application Area
    • 5.4.1 STEM and Technical Education
    • 5.4.2 Medical and Healthcare Training
    • 5.4.3 Language and Arts Learning
    • 5.4.4 Vocational and Technical Skills
    • 5.4.5 Soft-Skills and Team Collaboration
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
      • 5.5.1.1 United States
      • 5.5.1.2 Canada
      • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
      • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
      • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
      • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
      • 5.5.3.1 Germany
      • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
      • 5.5.3.3 France
      • 5.5.3.4 Spain
      • 5.5.3.5 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
      • 5.5.4.1 China
      • 5.5.4.2 India
      • 5.5.4.3 Japan
      • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
      • 5.5.4.5 ASEAN
      • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
      • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
        • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
        • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
        • 5.5.5.1.3 Turkey
        • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
      • 5.5.5.2 Africa
        • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
        • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
        • 5.5.5.2.3 Kenya
        • 5.5.5.2.4 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Meta Platforms, Inc.
    • 6.4.2 HTC Corporation
    • 6.4.3 Lenovo Group Limited
    • 6.4.4 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.5 Microsoft Corporation
    • 6.4.6 Sony Group Corporation
    • 6.4.7 Alphabet Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Pico Technology Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.9 Valve Corporation
    • 6.4.10 Unity Technologies SF
    • 6.4.11 Epic Games, Inc.
    • 6.4.12 zSpace, Inc.
    • 6.4.13 EON Reality, Inc.
    • 6.4.14 Avantis Systems Ltd.
    • 6.4.15 Veative Labs Pvt. Ltd.
    • 6.4.16 Virtalis Holdings Limited
    • 6.4.17 Nearpod, Inc.
    • 6.4.18 Labster ApS
    • 6.4.19 Immerse VR Ltd.
    • 6.4.20 VictoryXR, Inc.
    • 6.4.21 Dreamscape Immersive, Inc.
    • 6.4.22 Alchemy Immersive Limited

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment