美国金属罐：市场份额分析、产业趋势与统计、成长预测（2026-2031）

美国金属罐市场预计将从 2025 年的 213.8 亿美元成长到 2026 年的 220.4 亿美元，预计到 2031 年将达到 256.7 亿美元，2026 年至 2031 年的复合年增长率为 3.09%。

消费者对可无限循环利用的铝材日益增长的偏好，以及品牌所有者的永续性倡议，使得市场需求持续超过国内供应，工厂使用率也接近满负荷运转，即便墨西哥空罐进口被征收25%的关税。饮料、医药和高端个人护理品牌正不断转向金属包装，以满足耐用性和循环经济的目标。同时，轻量化技术正在降低材料消耗和运输成本。主要製造商的垂直整合策略确保了罐坯供应，并强化了竞争壁垒，但原材料价格波动和软包装技术的创新仍然是潜在的威胁。总体而言，美国金属罐市场受益于强劲的终端用户需求、高价值细分市场稳定的定价能力以及有利于单一材料包装形式的监管政策。

美国金属罐市场趋势与洞察

推广高回收率的替代包装材料

金属罐平均含有75%的再生材料，并且可以无限次重熔而不会劣化，与平均含有35%再生树脂的宝特瓶相比，在成本和永续性具有明显的优势。由于市政回收项目每回收一吨铝可产生约1200美元的收入，而PET瓶仅200美元，因此地方政府有奖励优先建造金属罐回收基础设施。品牌所有者的强制性要求，例如可口可乐35-40%的再生材料含量目标，确保了多年的采购量，即使在经济低迷时期也能保证最低需求。联邦采购标准设定了再生材料含量的阈值，确保了机构需求的持续成长。随着各州生产者延伸责任制（EPR）附加税对复合材料层压产品施加压力，金属罐在常温保存食品和特种饮料领域正获得更大的市场份额。

精酿啤酒和即饮饮料的快速成长正在重塑需求模式

全美超过9,000家精酿啤酒厂青睐铝罐，因为它能有效遮光、保持碳酸化，并能呈现鲜艳的图案，进而强化品牌故事。即饮型（RTD）酒精饮料是成长最快的细分市场，推动了对12盎司和8.4盎司规格的精製包装的需求，这些规格占据了高端货架位置。硬苏打水生产商为防止串味而支付的先进阻隔涂层费用比普通包装高出15%至20%。这一趋势正在促进区域性联合包装网路的发展，缩短产品从生产到商店的周期，并为灵活、快速换型的罐装生产线创造了机会。像Independent Can Company这样的专业供应商正在扩大其西海岸的生产能力，以满足小批量订单的需求，这表明市场对本地饮料趋势的应对力迅速。

替代包装形式的激增加剧了竞争压力。

采用高阻隔薄膜製成的立式袋比同类罐装产品轻60-70%，并可设有透明窗口展示产品新鲜度，从而吸引千禧世代消费者。轻质宝特瓶的重量持续下降，降低了单位成本，加剧了其与罐装产品在对价格敏感的饮料品类中的价格竞争。在某些汤类产品中，内衬铝层的纸盒包装比金属罐价格低15-25%，吸引了注重成本的食品加工商。材料科学的快速创新和快速更换包装图案的能力，使软包装在行销方面更具优势。儘管面临这些挑战，在需要蒸馏、维持碳酸气含量和延长保质期的品类中，罐装产品仍占据主导地位。

细分市场分析

截至2025年，铝罐占美国金属罐市场70.48%的份额，这主要得益于饮料行业的强劲需求，该行业对铝罐的耐腐蚀性和高端展示效果有较高要求。然而，钢罐在大包装食品和宠物食品领域正重新获得市场青睐，其三点焊接的罐体结构不仅成本更低，而且能够承受蒸馏灭菌製程。

轻量化技术使每罐铝材用量减少了13%，抵销了金属价格的波动。同时，马口铁罐製造商正在引入更薄的钢板，并采用改良的有机溶剂涂层，以减轻钢製容器的重量。区域原料采购模式也影响材料的选择：铝厂集中在南部和中西部回收槽源附近，而钢罐生产线则位于与钢铁厂配套的工厂附近。这些位置优势是现有企业和新参与企业选择生产地点的决定性因素。

到2025年，双板拉拔熨烫罐将占美国金属罐市场规模的53.78%，这主要得益于每分钟超过2300罐的高速生产线以及其优异的轴向强度，尤其适用于碳酸饮料。同时，受医药喷雾剂和皮肤泡沫剂需求的推动，一体式气雾剂容器将以4.68%的复合年增长率推动市场结构性成长。

三片式焊接罐在散装食品、咖啡和工业化学品领域仍然占据重要地位，因为其高度调节的便利性和成本效益超过了无缝结构的优势。罐体製造精度的不断提高使得全表面图案和雾面饰面成为可能，从而拓展了精酿啤酒和特殊能量饮料的优质化机会。

其他福利：

• Excel格式的市场预测（ME）表
• 3个月的分析师支持

目录

第一章 引言

• 研究假设和市场定义
• 调查范围

第二章调查方法

第三章执行摘要

第四章 市场情势

• 市场驱动因素
  • 金属包装回收率高
  • 罐头食品方便快捷，保存期限长。
  • 精酿啤酒和即饮饮料的蓬勃发展带动了罐装饮料需求的成长。
  • 监理机关推动永续单一材料包装
  • 透过轻量化创新降低单位罐体成本
  • 品牌所有者的循环包装倡议确保了对罐装食品的需求。
• 市场限制
  • 推广替代包装形式（PET、软包装袋）
  • 铝和钢铁等原料价格波动；
  • 对双酚A替代品过渡的担忧影响了消费者信心
  • 由于国内产能限制，罐用钢板供应面临风险。
• 产业价值链分析
• 波特五力分析
  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方的议价能力
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 竞争对手之间的竞争
• 宏观经济因素如何影响市场
• 监管环境
• 技术展望

第五章 市场规模与成长预测

• 依材料类型
  • 铝
  • 钢材
• 透过可结构
  • 两件套
  • 三件套
  • 单体气雾剂
• 按容量/尺寸
  • ≤250毫升
  • 250-500毫升
  • 500～1,000 ml
  • 1000毫升或更多
• 透过製造工艺
  • 拉伸和轧延（DandI）
  • 再拉伸（DRD）
  • 衝击挤压
• 按最终用户行业划分
  • 食物
  • 饮料
  • 个人护理和化妆品
  • 製药
  • 油漆和工业化学品
  • 汽车用液体/润滑油
  • 其他终端用户产业

第六章 竞争情势

• 市场集中度
• 策略趋势
• 市占率分析
• 公司简介
  • Crown Holdings, Inc.
  • Ball Corporation
  • Silgan Holdings Inc.
  • Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Company
  • Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
  • DS Containers, LLC
  • CCL Industries Inc.（CCL Container division）
  • Independent Can Company
  • Tecnocap SpA
  • CAN-PACK SA
  • Allstate Can Corporation
  • Envases Universales Group
  • Trivium Packaging BV
  • Greif, Inc.
  • Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd.
  • Montebello Packaging Inc.
  • Crown Cork and Seal USA, Inc.
  • Metal Container Corporation

第七章 市场机会与未来展望

The United States metal cans market is expected to grow from USD 21.38 billion in 2025 to USD 22.04 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 25.67 billion by 2031 at 3.09% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Growing preference for infinitely recyclable aluminum, combined with brand-owner sustainability pledges, keeps demand ahead of domestic supply and sustains near-maximum plant utilization despite a 25% tariff on empty cans imported from Mexico. Beverage, pharmaceutical, and premium personal-care brands continue to migrate to metal containers to meet durability and circular-economy goals, while lightweighting technology reduces material consumption and shipping costs. Vertical integration strategies by leading producers secure can-sheet supply and reinforce competitive barriers, yet input-price volatility and flexible packaging innovations remain persistent threats. Overall, the United States metal cans market benefits from strong end-use momentum, stable pricing power in high-value niches, and regulatory tailwinds favoring single-material packaging formats.

United States (US) Metal Cans Market Trends and Insights

High Recyclability Rates Drive Packaging Material Substitution

Metal cans contain 75% recycled content on average and can be remelted indefinitely without quality loss, giving them a clear cost and sustainability edge over PET bottles that contain 35% recycled resin on average. Municipal recycling programs earn about USD 1,200 per ton of recovered aluminum versus USD 200 for PET, incentivizing local governments to prioritize can collection infrastructure. Brand-owner mandates such as Coca-Cola's 35-40% recycled-content pledge lock in multiyear purchase volumes, guaranteeing baseline demand even during economic slowdowns. Federal procurement standards now specify recycled-content thresholds, ensuring ongoing institutional demand. As state extended producer-responsibility fees penalize complex laminates, metal cans gain additional market share in shelf-stable food and specialty beverage categories.

Craft-Beer and RTD Beverage Surge Reshapes Demand Patterns

More than 9,000 craft breweries nationwide prefer aluminum because it blocks light, maintains carbonation, and supports vibrant graphics that reinforce brand storytelling. Ready-to-drink alcoholic beverages are the fastest-growing subsegment, spurring demand for sleek 12 oz and 8.4 oz formats that command premium shelf positioning. Hard seltzer producers pay 15-20% above commodity pricing for advanced barrier coatings that avoid flavor pickup. The trend promotes regional co-packing networks to shorten product-to-shelf cycles, opening opportunities for flexible, quick-change can lines. Niche suppliers such as Independent Can Company expand West Coast capacity to meet small-batch orders, underscoring the market's responsiveness to localized beverage trends

Proliferation of Alternate Packaging Formats Intensifies Competitive Pressure

Stand-up pouches with high-barrier films weigh 60-70% less than comparable cans and enable transparent windows that showcase product freshness, appealing to millennial shoppers. Lightweight PET bottles continue to shed grams, lowering cost per unit and challenging cans on price in value-oriented beverage lines. Carton-based containers with aluminum layers undercut metal cans by 15-25% in certain soup categories, enticing cost-sensitive food processors. Rapid material-science innovation cycles and the speed of graphic changes give flexibles a marketing agility advantage. Despite these headwinds, cans maintain dominance where retort processing, carbonation retention, or long shelf life is essential.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

1. Regulatory Mandates Accelerate Sustainable Packaging Adoption
2. Lightweighting Innovations Transform Manufacturing Economics
3. Raw Material Price Volatility Creates Supply-Chain Vulnerabilities

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Aluminum accounted for 70.48% of United States metal cans market share in 2025, driven by beverages that demand corrosion resistance and premium shelf appeal. Nevertheless, steel cans regain momentum in large-format foods and pet nutrition because three-piece welded bodies offer cost advantages and withstand retort temperatures.

Lightweighting has trimmed aluminum usage by 13% per can, offsetting metal-price volatility, while tinplate suppliers introduce thinner gauges with improved organosol coatings to reduce steel container weight. Geographic feedstock patterns also shape material choice: aluminum plants cluster near recycled-can streams in the South and Midwest, whereas steel can lines stay close to integrated mills. These locational advantages inform footprint decisions for both incumbent and new entrants.

Two-piece drawn-and-ironed cans captured 53.78% of United States metal cans market size in 2025 owing to high-speed lines that exceed 2,300 cans per minute and deliver superior axial strength for sparkling beverages. Monobloc aerosol bodies, however, lead structural growth at 4.68% CAGR, powered by pharmaceutical spray and dermal-foam demand.

Three-piece welded formats remain relevant in bulk foods, coffee, and industrial chemicals where easy height variation and cost efficiency outweigh seamless construction benefits. Continuous improvement in body maker precision has enabled full-panel graphics and matte finishes, expanding premiumization opportunities across craft beer and specialty energy drinks.

The United States Metal Cans Market Report is Segmented by Material Type (Aluminium, and Steel), Can Structure (Two-Piece, Three-Piece, Monobloc Aerosol), Capacity/Size (<=250 Ml, 250-500 Ml, 500-1, 000 Ml, >1, 000 Ml), Manufacturing Process (Drawn and Ironed, Drawn and Redrawn, Impact Extrusion), End-User Industry (Food, Beverage, Personal Care and Cosmetics and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

1. Crown Holdings, Inc.
2. Ball Corporation
3. Silgan Holdings Inc.
4. Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Company
5. Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
6. DS Containers, LLC
7. CCL Industries Inc. (CCL Container division)
8. Independent Can Company
9. Tecnocap S.p.A.
10. CAN-PACK S.A.
11. Allstate Can Corporation
12. Envases Universales Group
13. Trivium Packaging B.V.
14. Greif, Inc.
15. Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd.
16. Montebello Packaging Inc.
17. Crown Cork and Seal USA, Inc.
18. Metal Container Corporation

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION

• 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
• 1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE

• 4.1 Market Drivers
  • 4.1.1 High recyclability rates of metal packaging
  • 4.1.2 Convenience and extended shelf life offered by canned foods
  • 4.1.3 Craft-beer and RTD beverage boom boosting can demand
  • 4.1.4 Regulatory push for sustainable, single-material packaging
  • 4.1.5 Lightweighting innovations lowering per-unit can cost
  • 4.1.6 Brand-owner circular-packaging pledges securing can volumes
• 4.2 Market Restraints
  • 4.2.1 Proliferation of alternate packaging formats (PET, pouches)
  • 4.2.2 Volatility in aluminum and steel input prices
  • 4.2.3 BPA-substitute migration concerns affecting consumer trust
  • 4.2.4 Domestic can-sheet capacity constraints creating supply risk
• 4.3 Industry Value Chain Analysis
• 4.4 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
  • 4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
  • 4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
  • 4.4.3 Threat of New Entrants
  • 4.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
  • 4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
• 4.5 The Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
• 4.6 Regulatory Landscape
• 4.7 Technological Outlook

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

• 5.1 By Material Type
  • 5.1.1 Aluminium
  • 5.1.2 Steel
• 5.2 By Can Structure
  • 5.2.1 Two-Piece
  • 5.2.2 Three-Piece
  • 5.2.3 Monobloc Aerosol
• 5.3 By Capacity / Size
  • 5.3.1 <=250 ml
  • 5.3.2 250-500 ml
  • 5.3.3 500-1,000 ml
  • 5.3.4 >1,000 ml
• 5.4 By Manufacturing Process
  • 5.4.1 Drawn and Ironed (DandI)
  • 5.4.2 Drawn and Redrawn (DRD)
  • 5.4.3 Impact Extrusion
• 5.5 By End-User Industry
  • 5.5.1 Food
  • 5.5.2 Beverage
  • 5.5.3 Personal Care and Cosmetics
  • 5.5.4 Pharmaceuticals
  • 5.5.5 Paints and Industrial Chemicals
  • 5.5.6 Automotive Fluids and Lubricants
  • 5.5.7 Other End-User Industry

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

• 6.1 Market Concentration
• 6.2 Strategic Moves
• 6.3 Market Share Analysis
• 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global-level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
  • 6.4.1 Crown Holdings, Inc.
  • 6.4.2 Ball Corporation
  • 6.4.3 Silgan Holdings Inc.
  • 6.4.4 Mauser Packaging Solutions Holding Company
  • 6.4.5 Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
  • 6.4.6 DS Containers, LLC
  • 6.4.7 CCL Industries Inc. (CCL Container division)
  • 6.4.8 Independent Can Company
  • 6.4.9 Tecnocap S.p.A.
  • 6.4.10 CAN-PACK S.A.
  • 6.4.11 Allstate Can Corporation
  • 6.4.12 Envases Universales Group
  • 6.4.13 Trivium Packaging B.V.
  • 6.4.14 Greif, Inc.
  • 6.4.15 Toyo Seikan Group Holdings, Ltd.
  • 6.4.16 Montebello Packaging Inc.
  • 6.4.17 Crown Cork and Seal USA, Inc.
  • 6.4.18 Metal Container Corporation

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

• 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment