供应商永续性:Ciena 在网路设备供应商中引领绿色发展,而晶片、光纤和中国供应商则落后
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1655857

供应商永续性:Ciena 在网路设备供应商中引领绿色发展,而晶片、光纤和中国供应商则落后

Vendor Sustainability: Ciena Leads the Green Charge among NEPs; Chip, Fiber, and Chinese Vendors Lag

出版日期: | 出版商: MTN Consulting, LLC | 英文 9 Pages | 订单完成后即时交付

价格

本报告涵盖电信领域主要供应商的能源消耗、再生能源使用和碳足迹。

视觉

本报告是对先前两份有关电信永续性的报告的后续:2023 年的 "供应商需要绿色证书才能赢得电信业务" 和 2024 年的 "随着气候变迁迅速恶化,营运商迈出实现永续发展的小步" 。

刊载组织

  • Accenture plc
  • Alphabet
  • Amazon
  • Amdocs
  • Arista Networks
  • Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)
  • Celesticc
  • China Comservice
  • Chunghwa Telecom
  • Ciena
  • Cisco Systems
  • CommScope
  • Corning
  • EcoVadis
  • Ericsson
  • Flex
  • Fujikura
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • GHG Protocol
  • Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative (GeSI)
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
  • Huawei
  • IBM
  • IFRS International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)
  • Infinera
  • Intel
  • Jabil
  • Joint Alliance for CSR (JAC)
  • Juniper Networks
  • KDDI
  • Korea Telecom (KT)
  • Microsoft
  • NEC Corp
  • Nokia
  • Oracle
  • Orange
  • Ribbon
  • Samsung Electronics
  • Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)
  • Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
  • Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD)
  • Tech Mahindra ZTE

目录

摘要

简介

分析

刊载供应商概要

2023年的永续性报告:调查结果

  • 能源消费
  • 能源强度
  • 温室效应气体的排放

领导企业·追随者企业

总论

附录

Product Code: GNI-06022025-1

This brief report addresses energy consumption, use of renewables, and carbon emissions among key vendors to the telecommunications operator (telco) sector. MTN Consulting views climate change as an urgent crisis that is being ignored by too many of the world's wealthiest countries & companies. This report is part of our ongoing coverage of the issue, and an attempt to call greater attention to the subject.

VISUALS

This Brief is a follow-up to two pioneering reports published by MTN Consulting on sustainability in telecom: the 2023 study, "Vendors need green credentials to win telco business," and 2024's "Operators take baby steps towards sustainability as climate change worsens rapidly". The former report analyzed the role of vendors' climate practices in the carbon footprint of their key customers, the telcos. It also provided a framework for understanding the data and the relevant industry organizations and standards (e.g. GRI, SBTi, CDP, TCFD, JAC, GHG Protocol, GeSI, and SASB/ISSB). In the latter report, MTN Consulting reported on a disappointing lack of progress among telcos in their carbon footprints. Telco emissions were basically flat in 2023 YoY. That report's analysis considered only Scope 1 & Scope 2 emissions, and used the "market-based" standard for Scope 2 calculations. This approach should bias the numbers downwards, as it allows companies to reduce reported emissions based on things like renewable energy credits, but the results were nonetheless disappointing for the climate.

Since we did not include Scope 3 in our analysis, which capture upstream and downstream emissions, it's important to examine how vendors (i.e. the "upstream" for telcos) are progressing in their sustainability programs. Unfortunately, the news is not good. For a large sample of 26 vendors selling to telcos, total emissions (Scope 1 + Scope 2 market-based + Scope 3, or "S1-3m") amounted to 481 million metric tons of CO2-equivalent in 2023, down just 3% YoY. Relative to revenues, S1-3m emissions were 254.7 metric tons per US$1M in revenues in 2023, from 271.9 in 2022. Use of renewables rose a bit in 2023, to 68%, from 61% in 2022. All three results indicate some progress, but very slow. The progress is certainly not in line with the urgency of the climate crisis, or the stated carbon neutrality goals of telcos & much of the tech sector. One factor is that there are a few companies in the telco supply chain with notoriously high carbon footprints. Nearly all companies in China fall into this bucket, including top 5 Telco NI vendors Huawei, ZTE, and China Comservice. In addition, cabling & connectivity vendors like Corning and CommScope are behind the times in the march to green energy, as are chip companies further upstream such as Intel. More needs to be done, and quickly, in order for telecom to begin to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem.

That said, there are some leaders in the sector, based upon a relatively high level of renewable energy and low carbon emissions relative to revenues. Within the group of 26 , the leaders are: Accenture, Alphabet, Ciena, IBM, and Oracle. Notably, only one of these - Ciena - is a traditional "network equipment provider" or NEP. In general, NEPs tend to consume more energy and have higher carbon footprints than software & services specialists. Two other NEPs, Ericsson and Nokia, should get honorable mention, as they are making good progress and are relatively transparent in their reports.

Organizations mentioned:

  • Accenture plc
  • Alphabet
  • Amazon
  • Amdocs
  • Arista Networks
  • Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP)
  • Celesticc
  • China Comservice
  • Chunghwa Telecom
  • Ciena
  • Cisco Systems
  • CommScope
  • Corning
  • EcoVadis
  • Ericsson
  • Flex
  • Fujikura
  • Fujitsu Limited
  • GHG Protocol
  • Global Enabling Sustainability Initiative (GeSI)
  • Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)
  • Huawei
  • IBM
  • IFRS International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB)
  • Infinera
  • Intel
  • Jabil
  • Joint Alliance for CSR (JAC)
  • Juniper Networks
  • KDDI
  • Korea Telecom (KT)
  • Microsoft
  • NEC Corp
  • Nokia
  • Oracle
  • Orange
  • Ribbon
  • Samsung Electronics
  • Science-Based Targets Initiative (SBTi)
  • Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB)
  • Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD)
  • Tech Mahindra
  • ZTE

Table of Contents

Summary

Introduction

Analysis

Overview of the vendors included

Results from 2023 sustainability reports

  • Energy consumption
  • Energy intensity
  • Greenhouse gas emissions

Leaders and laggards

Conclusion

Appendix

List of Figures

  • Figure 1: Total energy consumption in 2023, TWh
  • Figure 2: Energy intensity, 2023 (MWh per $1M in revenues)
  • Figure 3: Scope 1 + Scope 2 (market-based) GHG emissions (CO2-equivalent metric tons) per GWh of energy consumed, 2023
  • Figure 4: Renewable energy as a percentage of total consumption, 2023
  • Figure 5: Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and Scope 3 emissions, per US$1M in revenue, 2023