Guidehouse Research 排行榜：电网分析供应商

本报告分析了一个对能源转型至关重要的快速发展的市场。随着分散式能源 (DER) 的日益普及、监管环境的不断变化以及对先进规划工具需求的日益增长，公用事业公司和电网运营商正面临前所未有的挑战，对先进电网规划分析解决方案的需求也激增。本报告的发布尤其及时，因为新软体平台的出现以及诸如 FERC 第 2222 号命令等监管因素正在显着改变输配电网路的规划、建模和优化方式。

Guidehouse Research 的排行榜报告是一项全面的基准研究，旨在评估和排名特定技术或服务领域的领先供应商。排行榜方法论对每家公司的策略和执行情况进行了透明的比较评估，使利害关係人能够清楚地了解竞争格局。本期报告评估了七家领先的电网分析供应商，重点介绍了它们的优势、差异化因素和市场地位，并确定了最有希望长期成功的公司。

本排行榜上的公司排名是基于严格的标准，分为两大类： "策略" 和 "执行" 。策略包括愿景、市场进入策略、合作伙伴关係、技术能力和地理覆盖范围。执行包括销售和行销、产品性能、产品组合广度、定价和可持续性。在策略和执行两方面均表现卓越，并兼具先进技术、强大的市场影响力和稳健的商业模式的公司，将被评为 "领导者" 。这种系统化的评估方式确保排行榜不仅反映公司目前的实力，也反映其在电网规划分析市场持续保持领先地位的潜力。

目录

第一章：摘要整理

• 市场概览
• 排行榜

第二章：市场概览

• 市场定义
• 市场驱动因素
  • 分散式能源容量扩展与整合
  • 电网整合
  • 软体演进
  • 託管容量分析与拓朴最佳化
  • 监管驱动因素
  • 尖峰需求
• 市场壁垒
  • 传统软体与规划策略
  • 资料互通性
  • 数据质量
  • 熟练劳动力短缺

第三章：Guidehouse 研究排行榜

• Guidehouse Research 排行榜类别
  • 领导者
  • 竞争者
  • 挑战者
  • 追随者
• Guidehouse Research 排行榜网格

第四章：公司排名

• 领导者
  • GE Vernova
  • 西门子
  • Energy Exemplar
  • 日立能源
• 竞争者
• OATI
• DIgSILENT
• Copperleaf

第五章：缩写与简称

第六章：目录

章节7：图表

第 8 章：研究范围与方法

The 2025 Guidehouse Research Leaderboard: Grid Planning Analytics Providers report examines a rapidly evolving market that is critical to the energy transition. As utilities and grid operators face mounting challenges from the integration of distributed energy resources (DER), regulatory changes, and the need for advanced planning tools, the demand for sophisticated grid planning analytics solutions has surged. This report is especially timely, as the sector is experiencing significant innovation, with new software platforms and regulatory drivers-such as FERC Order No. 2222-reshaping how utilities plan, model, and optimize transmission and distribution networks.

A Guidehouse Research Leaderboard report is a comprehensive benchmarking study that evaluates and ranks leading vendors within a specific technology or service domain. The Leaderboard methodology provides a transparent, comparative assessment of each company's strategy and execution, offering stakeholders a clear view of the competitive landscape. In this edition, seven prominent grid planning analytics providers are assessed, with the report highlighting the strengths, differentiators, and market positions of each, and identifying which companies are best positioned for long-term success.

The ranking of companies in this Leaderboard is based on a rigorous set of criteria, divided into two main categories: Strategy and Execution. Strategy encompasses vision, go-to-market approach, partnerships, technology, and geographic reach, while Execution covers sales and marketing, product performance, portfolio breadth, pricing, and staying power. Companies that excel in both categories, demonstrating advanced technology, strong market presence, and robust business models, are recognized as Leaders. This structured evaluation ensures that the Leaderboard reflects not only current capabilities but also the potential for sustained leadership in the grid planning analytics market.

Table of Contents

1. Executive Summary

• 1.1 Market Introduction
• 1.2 Leaderboard Grid

2. Market Overview

• 2.1 Market Definition
• 2.2 Market Drivers
  • 2.2.1 DER Hosting and Integration
  • 2.2.2 Transmission Interconnection
  • 2.2.3 Software Evolutions
  • 2.2.4 Hosting Capacity Analysis and Topology Optimization
  • 2.2.5 Regulatory Enablers
  • 2.2.6 Peak Demand
• 2.3 Market Barriers
  • 2.3.1 Legacy Software and Planning Strategies
  • 2.3.2 Data Interoperability
  • 2.3.3 Data Quality
  • 2.3.4 Lack of Skilled Labor

3. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard

• 3.1 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Categories
  • 3.1.1 Leaders
  • 3.1.2 Contenders
  • 3.1.3 Challengers
  • 3.1.4 Followers
• 3.2 The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid

4. Company Rankings

• 4.1 Leaders
  • 4.1.1 GE Vernova
  • 4.1.2 Siemens
  • 4.1.3 Energy Exemplar
  • 4.1.4 Hitachi Energy
• 4.2 Contenders
  • 4.2.1 OATI
  • 4.2.2 DIgSILENT
  • 4.2.3 Copperleaf

5. Acronym and Abbreviation List

6. Table of Contents

7. Table of Charts and Figures

8. Scope of Study and Methodology

• 8.1 Scope of Study
• 8.2 Sources and Methodology
  • 8.2.1 Vendor Selection
  • 8.2.2 Ratings Scale
    • 8.2.2.1 Score Calculations
  • 8.2.3 Criteria Definitions
    • 8.2.3.1 Strategy
    • 8.2.3.2 Execution

List of Tables

• Table 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Overall Scores
• Table 4-1. GE Vernova's Product Portfolio
• Table 4-2. Siemens' Core Planning Modules
• Table 4-3. Siemens' Partners
• Table 4-4. Energy Exemplar's Core Technology Suite
• Table 4-5. Key Features of Hitachi Energy's Platforms
• Table 4-6. Key Features of OATI's webSmartEnergy DERMS Platform
• Table 4-7. Key Features of DIgSILENT's PowerFactory Platform
• Table 4-8. Key Features of IFS Copperleaf Integrated Planning

List of Figures

• Chart 1-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid
• Chart 3-1. The Guidehouse Research Leaderboard Grid
• Chart 4-1. GE Vernova Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-2. Siemens AG Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-3. Energy Exemplar Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-4. Hitachi Energy Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-5. OATI Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-6. DIgSILENT Strategy and Execution Scores
• Chart 4-7. Copperleaf Strategy and Execution Scores