![]() |
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1814222
人工智慧模型风险管理市场规模、份额、成长分析(按组件、部署模型、风险、应用和地区)—2025 年至 2032 年产业预测AI Model Risk Management Market Size, Share, and Growth Analysis, By Component (Software, Services), By Deployment Model (On-premises, Cloud), By Risk, By Application, By Region - Industry Forecast 2025-2032 |
全球人工智慧模型风险管理市场预计将在 2023 年达到 57 亿美元,从 2024 年的 64.5 亿美元成长到 2032 年的 172.6 亿美元,在预测期内(2025-2032 年)的复合年增长率为 13.1%。
由于金融、航空、医疗、汽车和製造等关键领域对人工智慧整合的需求不断增长,全球人工智慧模型风险管理市场正在不断扩大。企业在决策和风险管理方面对人工智慧的依赖日益增加,凸显了对合规、可信和透明的模型营运的需求。加强的监管指导强调课责、可解释性和公平性,促使企业投资于管治和检验技术。备受瞩目的模型偏差和资料外洩案例推动了对全面风险管理框架的需求,以有效识别、评估和降低人工智慧风险。此外,可解释人工智慧、监管技术的接受度以及合规要求的不断提高,正在推动企业对综合风险管理解决方案的需求,以提高营运效率并增强对人工智慧结果的信任。
Global AI Model Risk Management Market size was valued at USD 5.7 billion in 2023 and is poised to grow from USD 6.45 billion in 2024 to USD 17.26 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 13.1% during the forecast period (2025-2032).
The global AI model risk management market is expanding as the demand for AI integration in essential sectors like finance, aviation, healthcare, automotive, and manufacturing continues to rise. Companies increasingly rely on AI for decision-making and risk management, highlighting the need for compliant, reliable, and transparent model operations. Enhanced regulatory guidance emphasizes accountability, explainability, and fairness, prompting businesses to invest in governance and validation technologies. The escalation of notable instances of model biases and data breaches has intensified the need for comprehensive risk management frameworks to effectively identify, assess, and mitigate AI risks. Furthermore, the acceptance of explainable AI, regulatory technology, and expanding compliance demands drives organizations to seek integrated risk management solutions that enhance operational efficiency and foster trust in AI outcomes.
Top-down and bottom-up approaches were used to estimate and validate the size of the Global AI Model Risk Management market and to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets. The research methodology used to estimate the market size includes the following details: The key players in the market were identified through secondary research, and their market shares in the respective regions were determined through primary and secondary research. This entire procedure includes the study of the annual and financial reports of the top market players and extensive interviews for key insights from industry leaders such as CEOs, VPs, directors, and marketing executives. All percentage shares split, and breakdowns were determined using secondary sources and verified through Primary sources. All possible parameters that affect the markets covered in this research study have been accounted for, viewed in extensive detail, verified through primary research, and analyzed to get the final quantitative and qualitative data.
Global AI Model Risk Management Market Segments Analysis
Global AI Model Risk Management Market is segmented by Component, Deployment Model, Risk, Application, End Use and region. Based on Component, the market is segmented into Software and Services. Based on Deployment Model, the market is segmented into On-premises and Cloud. Based on Risk, the market is segmented into Model risk, Operational risk, Compliance risk, Reputational risk and Strategic risk. Based on Application, the market is segmented into Credit risk management, Fraud detection and prevention, Algorithmic trading, Predictive maintenance and Others. Based on End Use, the market is segmented into BFSI, IT & telecom, Healthcare, Automotive, Retail and e-commerce, Manufacturing, Government and defense and Others. Based on region, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East & Africa.
Driver of the Global AI Model Risk Management Market
The growing reliance on artificial intelligence within business operations is giving rise to significant risks associated with model failures, biases, and cybersecurity threats. Companies are increasingly aware that these operational vulnerabilities can heighten their overall risk, prompting them to invest in scalable and automated risk management solutions. These tools are designed to efficiently monitor, validate, and secure AI implementations, enabling organizations to mitigate potential disruptions and safeguard their reputation. As a result, there is a strong push towards enhancing risk management capabilities to ensure AI technologies are deployed safely and effectively, ultimately supporting robust business continuity.
Restraints in the Global AI Model Risk Management Market
A significant constraint in the Global AI Model Risk Management market is the high cost associated with implementation, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises. Many organizations find the expenses related to technology integration, ongoing monitoring, compliance requirements, and associated labor to be prohibitive. As a result, these financial barriers can restrict the ability of numerous companies to adopt and effectively utilize advanced AI model risk management systems. This economic challenge can ultimately hinder the overall growth and accessibility of sophisticated risk management solutions in the market, limiting participation to a smaller group of organizations with more substantial resources.
Market Trends of the Global AI Model Risk Management Market
The Global AI Model Risk Management market is increasingly emphasizing the integration of explainable and responsible AI principles. Companies are actively seeking solutions that enhance transparency, auditability, and interpretability of AI systems, reflecting a broader demand for ethical governance frameworks. This trend is fueled by growing regulatory pressures and the necessity to foster stakeholder trust while addressing biases and unintended consequences that may arise from automated systems. By prioritizing responsible AI practices, organizations aim to ensure compliance, minimize risk, and enhance the overall reliability of their AI models, ultimately leading to more sustainable and socially acceptable AI deployment strategies.