市场调查报告书
商品编码
1358994
到 2030 年网路安全网格市场预测:按部署模式、产品、层、组织规模、安全类型、最终用户和区域进行全球分析Cybersecurity Mesh Market Forecasts to 2030 - Global Analysis By Deployment Mode (On-Premises and Cloud), Offering, Layer, Organization Size, Security Type, End User and By Geography |
根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据,2023 年全球网路安全网格市场规模将达到 24 亿美元,预计到 2030 年将达到 57 亿美元,预测期内年复合成长率为 13.1%。
「网路安全网格」是指透过自己的边界单独保护每个设备的网路防御策略,例如防火墙和网路保护技术。网路安全网格采用整体方法,而不是透过单一边界保护整个 IT 环境的许多安全技术。这种 IT 安全方法以及在地理上分布机器和设备的远端工作和云端解决方案越来越受欢迎。由于这些变化,新的资料存取和控制策略正在更新,新技术正在被引入。
根据Flexera的2021年云端状况报告,92%的企业采用了多重云端策略,80%的企业采用了混合云策略。
企业越来越多地使用多重云端部署。企业经常使用多个云端供应商的服务。在保护资产时,当 IT 资产分布在多个云端时,碎片问题会更加严重。一朵云,只有一个介面,管理更简单。多重云端部署需要维护多个介面并了解在每个云端上运行的每个元件。这些都是影响市场拓展的因素。
安全事件通常是由错误配置引起的。网路安全网格有如此多的元件和配置需要控制,增加了错误配置导致漏洞和安全漏洞的可能性。此外,可能很难获得具有设计、部署和操作网路安全网格所需知识和经验的网路安全专业人员,从而限制了市场扩张。
分散式安全架构在业界越来越受欢迎。不存在单点故障,使攻击者更难存取您的网路。组织不再依赖集中式安全基础设施,而是转向分散式模型,将安全控制和功能分布在不同的网路节点上。这种趋势增加了弹性,因为单一节点的故障不会威胁到整个系统的安全。
下一代防火墙和增强的威胁对策需要大量的实施成本。因此,预算限制是创投公司和新兴企业面临的问题。建置和维护网路安全网格的成本可能很高。需要在人员、软体、硬体和持续营运成本方面进行投资。对于预算有限的小型企业来说,采用全网状系统可能会很困难。投资成本加上设计和实施限制可能会阻碍市场扩张。
COVID-19 的爆发迫使许多组织立即转向远端工作。这种快速的变化造成了严重的网路安全问题,因为员工现在从各种不同且不太安全的位置存取公司网路。这次疫情暴露了国际供应链的弱点。确保供应链网路的安全已变得至关重要。网状网路可以提供更可靠且安全的供应链通讯架构。
解决方案领域预计将出现良好的增长。边缘运算、机器学习和人工智慧等技术发展使得建构网路安全网格系统成为可能。透过提供智慧威胁侦测、行为分析和自动边缘回应,这些解决方案可以改善您的整体安全状况。许多公司都受到有关资料安全和隐私的严格法规和合规规则的约束。
预计医疗保健领域在预测期内的年复合成长率最高。这是因为保护病患健康记录的重要性以及医疗保健产业容易遭受网路攻击。资料外洩、勒索软体和有针对性的攻击是网路风险不断增加的例子。医疗保健组织了解采取强有力的安全措施来保护病患资讯、关键基础设施和照护连续性的重要性。为了减轻该领域日益增长的风险,网路安全网格提供了一种高度适应性和去中心化的安全方法。
预计北美在预测期内将占据最大的市场占有率。针对关键基础设施、企业、组织、政府机构和个人的攻击越来越多地发生在网路上。需要安全的网路安全程序来保护您的基础架构、关键系统和敏感资料。当个人资讯公开时,信任度就会降低,隐私问题就会出现。网路安全网格解决方案透过细粒度的安全控制和加密方法帮助企业保护敏感资料、确保资料隐私并遵守法规。
预计欧洲在预测期内的年复合成长率最高。资料外洩、针对性攻击和勒索软体攻击只是欧洲经常遇到的复杂网路风险的一部分。目标组织包括关键基础设施、医疗保健提供者、金融机构和政府机构。透过提供分散式安全管理、共用威胁情报和协调的事件回应,网路安全网格可以应对这些不断变化的威胁并提供更强大的安全功能。
According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market is accounted for $2.4 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach $5.7 billion by 2030 growing at a CAGR of 13.1% during the forecast period. The term "cybersecurity mesh" refers to a cyber defense tactic that individually safeguards each device with its own perimeter, such as firewalls and network protection technologies. A cybersecurity mesh takes a comprehensive approach as opposed to many security techniques that just safeguard a single perimeter around a complete IT environment. Along with remote work and cloud solutions that scatter machines and devices across geographies, the adoption of this approach to IT security has grown in popularity. New data access and control policies have been updated as a result of these changes, and new technology has been implemented.
According to Flexera's 2021 State of the Cloud Report, 92% of enterprises have a multi-cloud strategy, and 80% have a hybrid cloud strategy.
Multi-cloud installations are increasingly being used by businesses. Businesses frequently use services from multiple cloud providers. When safeguarding assets, distributed IT assets in several clouds make the fragmentation problem worse. Because there is only one interface when an organization has a single cloud, management is simpler. Multiple interfaces must be maintained in multi-cloud deployments, and each component operating in each of those clouds must be understood. This is the element impacting the market's expansion.
Instances of security incidents frequently stem from configuration errors. With so many components and settings to control in a cybersecurity mesh, the chance of incorrect configuration resulting in vulnerabilities or security breaches is increased. Additionally, it might be difficult to acquire cybersecurity experts that have the knowledge and experience needed to design, deploy, and operate a cybersecurity mesh, which restricts market expansion.
Decentralized security architectures are gaining popularity in the industry. Having no single point of failure makes it more challenging for attackers to access the network. Organizations are switching to a distributed model that disperses security controls and capabilities among different network nodes rather than relying on centralized security infrastructure. Due to the fact that the security of the entire system is not jeopardized by the failure of a single node, this trend enables increased resilience.
A significant amount of money is needed to establish next-generation firewalls and enhanced threat protection. As a result, budgetary restrictions are an issue for start-ups and emerging firms. It might be expensive to construct and maintain a cybersecurity mesh. Investments in labour, software, hardware, and continuing operational costs are necessary. Smaller businesses with tighter budgets could find it challenging to adopt a complete mesh system. Investment costs, together with design and implementation limitations, might stunt market expansion.
Many organizations were compelled by the COVID-19 outbreak to immediately switch to remote labor. As employees began accessing company networks from varied, frequently less secure locations, this abrupt change raised serious cybersecurity problems. The epidemic revealed weaknesses in international supply chains. It became essential to ensure the security of supply chain networks. Mesh networking might offer a supply chain communication architecture that is more dependable and safe.
The solutions segment is estimated to have a lucrative growth. The development of technologies like edge computing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence has made it possible to create cybersecurity mesh systems. By providing intelligent threat detection, behaviour analytics, and automated edge responses, these solutions improve the overall security posture. Many firms are subject to stringent regulatory and compliance rules around data security and privacy.
The healthcare segment is anticipated to witness the highest CAGR growth during the forecast period, owing to the importance of securing patient health records and the healthcare industry's vulnerability to cyber attacks. Data breaches, ransom ware, and targeted assaults are a few instances of the increasing number of cyber risks. Healthcare organizations understand how crucial it is to have robust security measures in place to protect patient information, critical infrastructure, and treatment continuity. To lessen the escalating risks in this sector, cybersecurity mesh offers an adaptive and distributed security approach.
North America is projected to hold the largest market share during the forecast period. Attacks against vital infrastructure, businesses, organizations, governmental institutions, and individuals are increasingly being carried out online. Secure cybersecurity procedures are necessary to protect infrastructure, critical systems, and sensitive data. Private information being made public diminishes trust and raises privacy issues. Cybersecurity mesh solutions help enterprises safeguard sensitive data, ensure data privacy, and comply with regulations by using granular security controls and encryption methods.
Europe is projected to have the highest CAGR over the forecast period. Data breaches, targeted attacks, and ransom ware attacks are just a few of the complex cyber risks that Europe frequently encounters. Organizations that are increasingly being attacked include crucial infrastructure, healthcare providers, financial institutions, and governmental bodies. By providing dispersed security controls, threat intelligence sharing, and incident response coordination to tackle these evolving threats, cybersecurity mesh offers better security capabilities.
Some of the key players profiled in the Cybersecurity Mesh Market include: Cato Networks Ltd., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Naoris Protocol, Cisco Systems, Inc., FireEye, Inc., Forcepoint LLC (Francisco Partners), Fortinet, Inc., Quasius Investment Corp, GCA Technology, IBM Corporation, Juniper Networks, Inc., McAfee LLC, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Aryaka Networks,Inc., Symantec Corporation (now part of Broadcom Inc.), Trend Micro Incorporated, VMware, Inc. and Zscaler, Inc.
In August 2023, GCA has announced a new collaboration with Amazon that will focus on educating young adults about the risks of scams. The project will foster consumer education around scam identification, prevention, and reduce the stigma around reporting scams among young adult Internet users, ranging from 18-25 years old.
In September 2022, Zscaler acquired ShiftRight. The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange cloud security platform is now integrating ShiftRight's workflow automation technology to automate security management for the increasing volume of threats and incidents that organizations are encountering.
In July 2022, Juniper Networks and Dragos announced their commitment to securing critical infrastructure through an official joint partnership that provides an automation framework for active attack response for OT-ICS networks and systematizes the research and development work done by both companies.
Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.
List of Figures
Figure 1 Cybersecurity Mesh - Market Segmentation
Figure 2 Research Methodology
Figure 3 Data Mining
Figure 4 Data Analysis
Figure 5 Data Validation
Figure 6 Research Pipeline
Figure 7 Research Approach
Figure 8 Research Sources
Figure 9 Cybersecurity Mesh Market Scenario, End User (2023) (% Market Share)
Figure 10 Cybersecurity Mesh Market Scenario, Emerging Markets (2023) (% Market Share)
Figure 11 Porter's Five Forces Analysis - Cybersecurity Mesh
Figure 12 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Deployment Mode (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 13 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By On-Premises (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 14 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Cloud (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 15 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Offering (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 16 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Solutions (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 17 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Services (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 18 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Layer (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 19 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Distributed Identity Fabric (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 20 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Consolidated Policy & Posture Management (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 21 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Consolidated Dashboards (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 22 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Security Analytics and Intelligence (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 23 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Organization Size (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 24 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 25 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Large Enterprises (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 26 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Security Type (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 27 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Application Security Mesh (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 28 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Cloud Security Mesh (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 29 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Data Security Mesh (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 30 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Endpoint Security Mesh (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 31 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Identity and Access Management (IAM) Mesh (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 32 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Network Security Mesh (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 33 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By End User (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 34 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Energy & Utilities (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 35 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Healthcare (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 36 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Banking, Financial Services & Insurance (BFSI) (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 37 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Information Technology & Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 38 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Government (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 39 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Other End Users (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 40 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Geography (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 41 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Country (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 42 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By North America (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 43 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Europe (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 44 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Asia Pacific (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 45 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By South America (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 46 Global Cybersecurity Mesh Market Analysis & Projection, By Middle East & Africa (2023 VS 2030) (US$MN)
Figure 47 Cato Networks Ltd.- Swot Analysis
Figure 48 Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.- Swot Analysis
Figure 49 Naoris Protocol- Swot Analysis
Figure 50 Cisco Systems, Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 51 FireEye, Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 52 Forcepoint LLC (Francisco Partners)- Swot Analysis
Figure 53 Fortinet, Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 54 Quasius Investment Corp- Swot Analysis
Figure 55 GCA Technology- Swot Analysis
Figure 56 IBM Corporation- Swot Analysis
Figure 57 Juniper Networks, Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 58 McAfee LLC- Swot Analysis
Figure 59 Palo Alto Networks, Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 60 Aryaka Networks,Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 61 Symantec Corporation (now part of Broadcom Inc.)- Swot Analysis
Figure 62 Trend Micro Incorporated- Swot Analysis
Figure 63 VMware, Inc.- Swot Analysis
Figure 64 Zscaler, Inc.- Swot Analysis