查看购物车
  • Traditional Chinese
  • English
  • Japanese
  • Korean
封面
市场调查报告书
商品编码
1489387

全球结构安全监控市场预测（-2030）：按组件、类型、实施方法、应用、最终用户和区域进行全球分析

Structural Health Monitoring Market Forecasts to 2030 - Global Analysis By Component (Hardware, Software and Other Components), Type (Wired Systems and Wireless Systems), Implementation Method, Application, End User and By Geography
出版日期: | 出版商: Stratistics Market Research Consulting | 英文 200+ Pages | 商品交期: 2-3个工作天内

价格

根据 Stratistics MRC 的数据，2023 年全球结构安全监控市场规模为 31.4 亿美元，预计到 2030 年将达到 117.9 亿美元，预测期内复合年增长率为 20.8%。结构安全监控(SHM) 是一种即时或定期评估桥樑、建筑物、管道等基础设施状况的主动方法。它使用感测器、资料分析技术和预测演算法来检测结构中的损坏、劣化和异常。持续监控应变、振动和温度等关键参数有助于在潜在问题变得严重之前识别它们，从而提高安全性、降低维护成本并延长资产的使用寿命。 SHM 系统可以有线或无线方式使用，提供结构性能的宝贵见解，并支援维护和维修的明智决策。其应用范围从土木工程到航太，提供全面的解决方案以确保关键基础设施的完整性和可靠性。

根据美国联邦公路管理局 (FHWA) 的数据，美国超过 30.0% 的建筑物（包括桥樑和水坝）的基础设施设计寿命超过了 50 年。

资产管理的必要性

资产管理在优化基础设施资产的性能和寿命方面发挥关键作用，因此是结构安全监控市场的关键驱动力。透过实施 SHM 解决方案，资产管理者可以主动即时监控桥樑、建筑物和水坝等结构的健康状况和完整性。这种主动方法可以让您及时发现结构问题，最大限度地降低维护成本并提高安全性。此外，SHM 有助于资料驱动的决策，使资产管理者能够确定维修的优先顺序并有效地分配资源。总体而言，透过将 SHM 纳入您的资产管理策略，组织可以确保其基础设施资产的可靠性和弹性。

复杂

复杂性是指在不同的结构环境中实施监测系统的复杂性所带来的挑战。这包括不同的结构设计、材料成分和操作条件等因素。管理这种复杂性需要强大的感测器技术、先进的资料分析和自适应监控策略。此外，与现有基础设施的整合以及与不同架构风格的兼容性增加了复杂性。克服这种复杂性需要创新方法、多学科协作以及健康监测技术的持续进步，以确保准确可靠的结构评估。

航太和国防领域的新兴应用

SHM技术可以即时监控结构的完整性，这对于确保航太和国防业务的安全和效率至关重要。在这些领域，即使是最小的结构缺陷也可能产生灾难性后果，SHM 提供预防性维护，减少停机时间和维护成本。此外，随着航太结构变得更加复杂以及对自主系统的需求增加，SHM 在确保连续运作和任务成功方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这为针对航太和国防应用的特定要求量身定制的先进 SHM 解决方案留下了成熟的市场，从而推动了该领域的创新和投资。

初始成本高

高初始成本的威胁是实施 SHM 系统所需的大量前期投资。这些成本包括购买感测器、资料采集系统、软体、安装和持续维护。对于潜在客户，尤其是民用基础设施和航太等领域的潜在客户来说，这些成本可能会成为采用的障碍，并阻止他们投资 SHM 解决方案，儘管有长期好处。为了应对这项威胁，SHM 供应商必须强调其係统的成本效益和长期节省，提供弹性价格设定模型，并持续创新以降低潜在客户的进入成本。

COVID-19 的影响：

COVID-19 的疫情对结构安全监控市场产生了重大影响。最初，由于供应链中断和施工取消导致计划停滞，对 SHM 系统的需求下降。然而，随着产业适应远端监控解决方案，人们越来越认识到健康管理在确保基础设施安全方面的重要性。此举正值当局寻求防止未来的干扰并确保关键基础设施的復原能力之际。

软体部分预计将在预测期内成为最大的部分

由于多种因素，结构安全监控市场的软体部分正在显着成长。感测器技术的进步增加了资料收集，需要先进的软体解决方案进行处理和分析。此外，人工智慧和机器学习演算法的整合增强了 SHM 软体更准确地检测和预测结构问题的能力。此外，随着基础设施老化和安全法规变得更加严格，健康管理软体的采用预计只会增加。

桥樑和水坝领域预计在预测期内复合年增长率最高

结构安全监控市场的桥樑和水坝部分的成长主要是由于对世界基础设施老化的日益担忧所推动的。政府和组织大力投资监测系统，以确保桥樑和水坝的安全和完整性。光纤和无线系统等先进感测器技术正在部署，以提供有关桥樑和大坝结构健康状况的即时资料，从而製定主动维护和风险缓解策略。此外，严格的安全法规以及最大限度地减少与结构故障相关的停机时间和维修成本的需求也加速了 SHM 解决方案的采用。

占比最大的地区：

由于桥樑、水坝和建筑物等基础设施计划投资的增加，北美结构健康监测市场出现了显着增长，导致对 SHM 系统的需求增加，以确保安全和寿命。有关结构安全的严格法规和标准正在推动 SHM 技术在各个行业的采用。此外，感测器技术、资料分析和无线通讯的进步使 SHM 系统更加高效且更具成本效益，从而推动了市场扩张。此外，人们对预测性维护和即时监控优势的认识不断提高，也推动了对 SHM 解决方案的投资。

复合年增长率最高的地区：

由于中国、印度和东南亚国家等国家的快速都市化和基础设施发展，亚太地区正在经历显着增长，增加了对SHM 系统的需求，以确保建筑物、桥樑和其他关键基础设施的安全和完整性。此外，该地区容易遭受地震等自然灾害，对先进监控解决方案的需求不断增加，而政府致力于加强基础设施弹性和安全标准的倡议正在推动市场成长。先进技术的出现和无线感测器网路的日益普及也有助于亚太地区 SHM 市场的扩张。

免费客製化服务

如果您订阅此报告，我们将为您提供以下免费自订选项之一：

  • 公司简介
    • 其他市场参与企业的综合分析（最多 3 家公司）
    • 主要企业SWOT分析（最多3家企业）
  • 区域分割
    • 根据客户兴趣对主要国家的市场估计/预测/复合年增长率（註：基于可行性检查）
  • 竞争基准化分析
    • 按产品系列、地理分布和策略联盟对主要企业基准化分析

目录

第一章执行摘要

第二章 前言

  • 概述
  • 相关利益者
  • 调查范围
  • 调查方法
    • 资料探勘
    • 资料分析
    • 资料检验
    • 研究途径
  • 研究资讯来源
    • 主要研究资讯来源
    • 二次研究资讯来源
    • 先决条件

第三章市场趋势分析

  • 介绍
  • 促进因素
  • 抑制因素
  • 机会
  • 威胁
  • 应用分析
  • 最终用户分析
  • 新兴市场
  • COVID-19 的影响

第4章波特五力分析

  • 供应商的议价能力
  • 买方议价能力
  • 替代品的威胁
  • 新进入者的威胁
  • 竞争公司之间的敌对关係

第五章全球结构安全监控市场：按组成部分

  • 介绍
  • 硬体
    • 资料采集系统
    • 感应器
    • 其他的
  • 软体
    • 参数识别与追踪
    • 设计与分析
    • 其他软体
  • 服务
    • 设计和咨询服务
    • 安装服务
    • 维运服务
    • 其他的
  • 其他的

第六章全球结构安全监控市场：依类型

  • 介绍
  • 有线系统
  • 无线系统

第七章全球结构安全监控市场：依实施方法分类

  • 介绍
  • 修改
  • 新建筑

第八章全球结构安全监控市场：依应用分类

  • 介绍
  • 飞机和风力发电机
  • 桥樑/水坝
  • 建筑物和体育场馆
  • 大型机械/设备
  • 船舶和平台
  • 其他的

第九章全球结构安全监控市场：依最终使用者分类

  • 介绍
  • 矿业
  • 航太和国防
  • 土木工程基础设施
  • 其他的

第十章全球结构安全监控市场：按地区

  • 介绍
  • 北美洲
    • 美国
    • 加拿大
    • 墨西哥
  • 欧洲
    • 德国
    • 英国
    • 义大利
    • 法国
    • 西班牙
    • 欧洲其他地区
  • 亚太地区
    • 日本
    • 中国
    • 印度
    • 澳洲
    • 纽西兰
    • 韩国
    • 其他亚太地区
  • 南美洲
    • 阿根廷
    • 巴西
    • 智利
    • 南美洲其他地区
  • 中东/非洲
    • 沙乌地阿拉伯
    • 阿拉伯聯合大公国
    • 卡达
    • 南非
    • 其他中东/非洲

第十一章 主要进展

  • 合约、伙伴关係、协作和合资企业
  • 收购和合併
  • 新产品发布
  • 业务扩展
  • 其他关键策略

第十二章 公司概况

  • Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • Cowi A/S
  • Digi-Texx
  • Geocomp, Inc.
  • Geokon
  • GeoSIG Ltd
  • James Fisher and Sons plc.
  • Kinemetrics
  • National Instruments Corp
  • Nova Ventures Group
  • Sixense
  • Structural Monitoring Systems Plc
  • Xylem
Product Code: SMRC26173

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Structural Health Monitoring Market is accounted for $3.14 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach $11.79 billion by 2030 growing at a CAGR of 20.8% during the forecast period. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a proactive approach to assessing the condition of infrastructure such as bridges, buildings, and pipelines in real-time or periodically. It involves the use of sensors, data analysis techniques, and predictive algorithms to detect damage, degradation, or abnormalities in structures. By continuously monitoring key parameters like strain, vibration, and temperature, SHM aims to identify potential issues before they escalate, thereby enhancing safety, reducing maintenance costs, and extending the lifespan of assets. SHM systems can be wired or wireless, and they provide valuable insights into structural performance, aiding in informed decision-making for maintenance and repairs. Its applications range from civil engineering to aerospace, offering a comprehensive solution for ensuring the integrity and reliability of critical infrastructure.

According to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in the U.S., more than 30.0% of structures, including bridges and dams, have surpassed their 50 years of infrastructure design life.

Market Dynamics:

Driver:

Need for asset management

Asset management is a key driver of the structural health monitoring market due to its crucial role in optimizing the performance and longevity of infrastructure assets. By implementing SHM solutions, asset managers can proactively monitor the health and integrity of structures such as bridges, buildings, and dams in real-time. This proactive approach enables timely detection of structural issues, minimizes maintenance costs, and enhances safety. Additionally, SHM facilitates data-driven decision-making, enabling asset managers to prioritize repairs and allocate resources efficiently. Overall, integrating SHM into asset management strategies helps organizations ensure the reliability and resilience of their infrastructure assets.

Restraint:

Complexity

The complexity restraint refers to challenges arising from the intricate nature of implementing monitoring systems in diverse structural environments. This encompasses factors such as varying structural designs, material compositions, and operational conditions. Managing this complexity requires robust sensor technologies, sophisticated data analytics, and adaptable monitoring strategies. Additionally, integration with existing infrastructure and compatibility with different architectural styles add layers of intricacy. Overcoming these complexities demands innovative approaches, interdisciplinary collaboration, and continuous advancements in SHM technology to ensure accurate and reliable structural assessments.

Opportunity:

Emerging applications in aerospace and defense

SHM technology offers real-time monitoring of structural integrity, which is crucial for ensuring safety and efficiency in aerospace and defense operations. In these sectors, where even minor structural defects can have catastrophic consequences, SHM provides proactive maintenance, reducing downtime and maintenance costs. Moreover, with the growing complexity of aerospace structures and the increasing demand for autonomous systems, SHM plays a pivotal role in ensuring continuous operation and mission success. This presents a ripe market for advanced SHM solutions tailored to the unique requirements of aerospace and defense applications, fostering innovation and investment in the sector.

Threat:

High initial costs

The high initial cost threats are the significant upfront investment required to implement SHM systems. These costs encompass purchasing sensors, data acquisition systems, software, installation, and ongoing maintenance. For potential clients, especially in sectors like civil infrastructure or aerospace, these expenses can act as a barrier to adoption, deterring them from investing in SHM solutions despite their long-term benefits. Addressing this threat requires SHM providers to emphasize the cost-effectiveness and long-term savings of their systems, offer flexible pricing models, and continually innovate to lower the entry costs for prospective clients.

Covid-19 Impact:

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the structural health monitoring market. Initially, there was a slowdown in projects due to supply chain disruptions and construction halts, leading to a dip in demand for SHM systems. However, as industries adapted to remote monitoring solutions, there emerged a heightened awareness of the importance of SHM in ensuring infrastructure safety. This awareness has driven investments in SHM technologies, particularly in sectors like transportation, energy, and civil engineering, as authorities seek to prevent future disruptions and ensure the resilience of critical infrastructure.

The software segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period

The software segment within the structural health monitoring market has seen significant growth due to several factors. Advancements in sensor technology have led to an increase in data collection, necessitating sophisticated software solutions for processing and analysis. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms has enhanced the capabilities of SHM software in detecting and predicting structural issues with greater accuracy. Furthermore, as infrastructure ages and safety regulations become more stringent, the adoption of SHM software is expected to continue its upward trajectory.

The bridges and dams segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period

The growth in the Bridges and Dams segment of the Structural Health Monitoring market is primarily driven by increasing concerns about the aging infrastructure worldwide. Governments and organizations are investing significantly in monitoring systems to ensure the safety and integrity of bridges and dams. Advanced sensor technologies, such as fiber optics and wireless systems, are being deployed to provide real-time data on the structural health of bridges and dams, leading to proactive maintenance and risk mitigation strategies. Additionally, the adoption of SHM solutions is being accelerated by stringent safety regulations and the need to minimize downtime and repair costs associated with structural failures.

Region with largest share:

The structural health monitoring market in North America has experienced significant growth due to increasing investments in infrastructure projects, such as bridges, dams, and buildings, which has driven the demand for SHM systems to ensure safety and longevity. Stringent regulations and standards regarding structural safety have propelled the adoption of SHM technologies across various industries. Additionally, advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and wireless communication have made SHM systems more efficient and cost-effective, further fueling market expansion. Moreover, growing awareness about the benefits of predictive maintenance and real-time monitoring has encouraged organizations to invest in SHM solutions.

Region with highest CAGR:

The Asia-Pacific region has witnessed significant growth due to rapid urbanization and infrastructural development across countries like China, India, and Southeast Asian nations which led to increased demand for SHM systems to ensure the safety and integrity of buildings, bridges, and other critical infrastructure. Moreover, the region's susceptibility to natural disasters like earthquakes has heightened the need for advanced monitoring solutions, government initiatives focusing on enhancing infrastructure resilience and safety standards have further propelled market growth. The emergence of advanced technologies and the growing adoption of wireless sensor networks have also contributed to the expansion of the SHM market in the Asia Pacific.

Key players in the market

Some of the key players in Structural Health Monitoring market include Campbell Scientific, Inc., Cowi A/S, Digi-Texx, Geocomp, Inc., Geokon, GeoSIG Ltd, James Fisher and Sons plc., Kinemetrics, National Instruments Corp., Nova Ventures Group, Sixense, Structural Monitoring Systems Plc and Xylem.

Key Developments:

In April 2024, Xylem introduces new mobile technology that will help water utilities meet compliance requirements for emerging drinking water contaminants such as PFAS. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) passed new regulations for Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for PFAS related contaminants in drinking water on April 10, 2024. Meeting new requirements can often lead to the implementation of new equipment. Xylem and Evoqua, now one company, have developed the MitiGATOR Mobile System that aims at filtering out new contaminants such as PFAS.

Components Covered:

  • Hardware
  • Software
  • Service
  • Other Components

Types Covered:

  • Wired Systems
  • Wireless Systems

Implementation Methods Covered:

  • Retrofitting
  • New Construction

Applications Covered:

  • Airframes and Wind Turbines
  • Bridges and Dams
  • Building and Stadiums
  • Large Machines and Equipment
  • Vessels and Platforms
  • Other Applications

End Users Covered:

  • Mining
  • Aerospace and Defense
  • Civil Infrastructure
  • Other End Users

Regions Covered:

  • North America
    • US
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • UK
    • Italy
    • France
    • Spain
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia Pacific
    • Japan
    • China
    • India
    • Australia
    • New Zealand
    • South Korea
    • Rest of Asia Pacific
  • South America
    • Argentina
    • Brazil
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Middle East & Africa
    • Saudi Arabia
    • UAE
    • Qatar
    • South Africa
    • Rest of Middle East & Africa

What our report offers:

  • Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
  • Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
  • Covers Market data for the years 2021, 2022, 2023, 2026, and 2030
  • Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
  • Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
  • Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
  • Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
  • Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Free Customization Offerings:

All the customers of this report will be entitled to receive one of the following free customization options:

  • Company Profiling
    • Comprehensive profiling of additional market players (up to 3)
    • SWOT Analysis of key players (up to 3)
  • Regional Segmentation
    • Market estimations, Forecasts and CAGR of any prominent country as per the client's interest (Note: Depends on feasibility check)
  • Competitive Benchmarking
    • Benchmarking of key players based on product portfolio, geographical presence, and strategic alliances

Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface

  • 2.1 Abstract
  • 2.2 Stake Holders
  • 2.3 Research Scope
  • 2.4 Research Methodology
    • 2.4.1 Data Mining
    • 2.4.2 Data Analysis
    • 2.4.3 Data Validation
    • 2.4.4 Research Approach
  • 2.5 Research Sources
    • 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
    • 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
    • 2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis

  • 3.1 Introduction
  • 3.2 Drivers
  • 3.3 Restraints
  • 3.4 Opportunities
  • 3.5 Threats
  • 3.6 Application Analysis
  • 3.7 End User Analysis
  • 3.8 Emerging Markets
  • 3.9 Impact of Covid-19

4 Porters Five Force Analysis

  • 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
  • 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
  • 4.3 Threat of substitutes
  • 4.4 Threat of new entrants
  • 4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Component

  • 5.1 Introduction
  • 5.2 Hardware
    • 5.2.1 Data Acquisition Systems
    • 5.2.2 Sensors
    • 5.2.3 Other Hardwares
  • 5.3 Software
    • 5.3.1 Parameter Identification and Tracking
    • 5.3.2 Design and Analysis
    • 5.3.3 Other Softwares
  • 5.4 Service
    • 5.4.1 Design and Consulting Service
    • 5.4.2 Installation Service
    • 5.4.3 Operation and Maintenance Service
    • 5.4.4 Other Services
  • 5.5 Other Components

6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Type

  • 6.1 Introduction
  • 6.2 Wired Systems
  • 6.3 Wireless Systems

7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Implementation Method

  • 7.1 Introduction
  • 7.2 Retrofitting
  • 7.3 New Construction

8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Application

  • 8.1 Introduction
  • 8.2 Airframes and Wind Turbines
  • 8.3 Bridges and Dams
  • 8.4 Building and Stadiums
  • 8.5 Large Machines and Equipment
  • 8.6 Vessels and Platforms
  • 8.7 Other Applications

9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By End User

  • 9.1 Introduction
  • 9.2 Mining
  • 9.3 Aerospace and Defense
  • 9.4 Civil Infrastructure
  • 9.5 Other End Users

10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market, By Geography

  • 10.1 Introduction
  • 10.2 North America
    • 10.2.1 US
    • 10.2.2 Canada
    • 10.2.3 Mexico
  • 10.3 Europe
    • 10.3.1 Germany
    • 10.3.2 UK
    • 10.3.3 Italy
    • 10.3.4 France
    • 10.3.5 Spain
    • 10.3.6 Rest of Europe
  • 10.4 Asia Pacific
    • 10.4.1 Japan
    • 10.4.2 China
    • 10.4.3 India
    • 10.4.4 Australia
    • 10.4.5 New Zealand
    • 10.4.6 South Korea
    • 10.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
  • 10.5 South America
    • 10.5.1 Argentina
    • 10.5.2 Brazil
    • 10.5.3 Chile
    • 10.5.4 Rest of South America
  • 10.6 Middle East & Africa
    • 10.6.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 10.6.2 UAE
    • 10.6.3 Qatar
    • 10.6.4 South Africa
    • 10.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa

11 Key Developments

  • 11.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
  • 11.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
  • 11.3 New Product Launch
  • 11.4 Expansions
  • 11.5 Other Key Strategies

12 Company Profiling

  • 12.1 Campbell Scientific, Inc.
  • 12.2 Cowi A/S
  • 12.3 Digi-Texx
  • 12.4 Geocomp, Inc.
  • 12.5 Geokon
  • 12.6 GeoSIG Ltd
  • 12.7 James Fisher and Sons plc.
  • 12.8 Kinemetrics
  • 12.9 National Instruments Corp
  • 12.10 Nova Ventures Group
  • 12.11 Sixense
  • 12.12 Structural Monitoring Systems Plc
  • 12.13 Xylem

List of Tables

  • Table 1 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Region (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 2 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Component (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 3 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Hardware (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 4 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Data Acquisition Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 5 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Sensors (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 6 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Hardwares (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 7 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Software (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 8 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Parameter Identification and Tracking (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 9 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Design and Analysis (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 10 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Softwares (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 11 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 12 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Design and Consulting Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 13 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Installation Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 14 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Operation and Maintenance Service (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 15 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Services (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 16 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Components (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 17 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Type (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 18 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Wired Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 19 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Wireless Systems (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 20 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Implementation Method (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 21 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Retrofitting (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 22 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By New Construction (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 23 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Application (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 24 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Airframes and Wind Turbines (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 25 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Bridges and Dams (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 26 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Building and Stadiums (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 27 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Large Machines and Equipment (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 28 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Vessels and Platforms (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 29 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other Applications (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 30 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By End User (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 31 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Energy (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 32 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Mining (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 33 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Aerospace and Defense (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 34 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Civil Infrastructure (2021-2030) ($MN)
  • Table 35 Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Outlook, By Other End Users (2021-2030) ($MN)

Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.